Frequency and load of hepatitis B virus DNA in first-time blood donors with antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen

The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and load of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in anti-HBc-positive first-time blood donors; it was designed to contribute to determining whether anti-HBc screening of blood donations might reduce the residual risk of posttransfusion HBV infection. A total of 14 251 first-time blood donors were tested for anti-HBc using a microparticle enzyme immunoassay; positive results were confirmed by a second enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For the detection of HBV DNA from plasma samples, we developed a novel and highly sensitive real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. The 95% detection limit of the method amounted to 27.8 IU/mL, consistent with the World Health Organization (WHO) international standard for HBV DNA. A total of 216 blood donors (1.52%) tested anti-HBc-positive in both tests, and 205 of them (16 HBsAg(+), 189 HBsAg(-)) were tested for HBV DNA. In 14 (87.5%) of the HBsAg-positive blood donors, HBV DNA was repeatedly detected, and in 3 (1.59%) of the HBsAg-negative donors, HBV DNA was also found repeatedly. In the 3 HBV DNA-positive, HBsAg-negative cases, anti-HBe and anti-HBs (> 100 IU/L) were also detectable. HBV DNA in HBsAg-negative as well as HBsAg-positive samples was seen at a low level. Thus, HBV DNA is sometimes found in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive, and anti-HBs-positive donors. Retrospective studies on regular blood donors and recipients are necessary to determine the infection rate due to those donations. Routine anti-HBc screening of blood donations could probably prevent some transfusion-transmitted HBV infections.     

Lack of occult hepatitis B virus infection among blood donors with isolated hepatitis B core antibody living in an HBV low prevalence region of Iran

BackgroundOccult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in blood donors is considered a potential threat for the safety of the blood supply, however conclusive studies on this issue are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the occult HBV infection in blood donors with isolated hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) living in the city of Arak, in the Central Province of Iran, as a low prevalence region for HBV.MethodsA total of 531 voluntary blood donors in Arak, Iran were included in this study. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), anti-HBc, and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) were tested in all subjects. The presence of HBV-DNA was determined quantitatively in plasma samples of cases with isolated anti-HBc (HBsAg-negative, anti-HBs-negative, and anti-HBc-positive) by real-time PCR using the artus HBV RG PCR kit on the Rotor-Gene 3000 real-time thermal cycler.ResultsOf 531 subjects enrolled in this study, 11 (2.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.8–3.2%) had isolated anti-HBc. HBV-DNA was not detected in any of the cases with isolated anti-HBc.ConclusionsOur study showed that all the blood donors with isolated anti-HBc were negative for HBV-DNA, and occult HBV infection did not occur in the blood donors of this low prevalence region for HBV infection.     

The biological meaning of anti-HBC positive result in blood donors: relation to HBV-DNA and to other serological markers

In order to assess the potential risk of anti-HBc-positive blood donors for post-transfusional hepatitis and to investigate whether other HBV serological markers are capable of identifying the presence of the virus, 1000 first-time blood donors were enrolled between June and July 1997. These donors were screened using routine Brazilian blood center tests (HIV 1 and 2, HTLV 1 and 2, Chagas disease, Syphilis, HCV, HBsAg, anti-HBc and ALT ). The 120 (12%) found to be anti-HBc-positive underwent further tests: HBe, anti-HBe, anti-HBs and HBV-DNA by PCR. Ten cases were HBsAg positive and all were HBV-DNA positive by PCR. Three HBsAg-negative donors were HBV-DNA-positive. Two HBV-DNA-positive donors were also anti-HBs-positive. All the HBV-positive donors had at least one HBV marker other than anti-HBc. Anti-HBc is an important cause of blood rejection. Testing for HBsAg alone is not fully protective and anti-HBc remains necessary as a screening test. The presence of anti-HBs is not always indicative of absence of the virus. The addition of other HBV serological markers could represent an alternative in predicting the presence of the virus when compared with PCR. It is recommended that other studies should be carried out to confirm this finding.     

HBsAg阴性/抗HBc阳性献血员HBV感染状况调查

目的 对431例HBsAg阴性献血员检测抗-HBc、抗-HBs,抗-HBc阳性者196例(45.5％),其中单项抗-HBc阳性者35例(17.9％),抗-HBc/抗-HBs阳性者161例(82.1％)。对抗-HBc阳性者检测抗-HBc IgM和HBV DNA(聚合酶链法),抗-HBc IgM的检出率为32.1％(63/196),其中抗-HBc/抗-HBs阳性者检出率为29.8％(48/161),单项抗-HBc阳性者检出率为42.9％(13/35),二者无差异;HBV DNA检出率为14.8％(29/196),单项抗-HBc阳性者HBV DNA检出率为25.7％,显著高于抗-HBs/抗-HBc阳性者(12.4％)(P<0.05);抗-HBc IgM阳性者HBV DNA检出率(39.7％)也显著高于抗-HBc IgM阴性者(3.0％)(P<0.001),二者阴阳性符合率则为78.6％(154/196)。HBsAg阴性/抗-HBc阳性献血员仍有传染性存在,尤以抗-HBc IgM阳性者最具血源传播HBV的危险性,因此,建议对HBsAg阴性献血员再进一步筛检抗-HBc IgM。     

Search for hepatitis B virus DNA in sera from patients with acute type B or non-A, non-B hepatitis

One hundred and three single sera from adults hospitalized with acute type B (78) or non-A, non-B (25) hepatitis were tested for the presence of hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA). All sera from patients with type B hepatitis were IgM anti-HBc-positive. These patients were classified as benign (47) or fulminant (31) hepatitis. The 25 acute non-A, non-B patients were also classified as benign (21) or fulminant (4) hepatitis and were negative for serologic markers of past HBV infection. Serum HBV DNA was detected with similar frequency in benign (38.5%) and fulminant (FH, 34.6%) HBsAg-positive cases. HBV DNA was not detected in either the 26 acute HBsAg-negative hepatitis B cases who were positive for anti-HBc and anti-HBs or the 25 acute non-A, non-B hepatitis cases. The absence of HBV DNA in 43.8% of benign hepatitis B patients who were positive for HBsAg and HBeAg could possibly be attributed to either low level replication of HBV that was not detectable by the [32P]HBV DNA probe or to a period of delayed clearance of free HBeAg following cessation of HBV replication. Emergence of anti-HBs in the presence of HBsAg did not always correspond to clearance of HBV in fulminant type B cases. However, in acute type B hepatitis, irrespectively of severity, disappearance of HBsAg and appearance of anti-HBs was accompanied by reduction of HBV replication to undetectable levels.     

Low rate of occult hepatitis B virus infection among anti-HBc positive blood donors living in a low prevalence region in Brazil

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among blood donors living in a geographic region of low (5.6%) anti-HBc prevalence. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sera from 150 candidate blood donors whose blood was rejected due to total anti-HBc reactivity (despite absence of HBsAg) were tested for anti-HBs and IgM anti-HBc antibodies, as well as for HBeAg/anti-HBe. Serum HBV DNA was sought by using a PCR assay able to amplify part of the surface gene. Viral load was measured in the PCR positive samples. RESULTS: The pattern 'anti-HBc alone' (without HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies) was found in 64 (42.7%) subjects. IgM anti-HBc and anti-HBe antibodies were detected in 2 (1.3%) and 80 (53.3%) samples, respectively. No sample was HBeAg-reactive. HBV DNA was repeatedly found in five (3.3%) samples, three of which were anti-HBs positive and two anti-HBs negative. All five HBV DNA positive samples showed a low viral load (<1000copies/ml). CONCLUSIONS: The data indicated a low rate of occult infection among anti-HBc positive, HBsAg negative blood donors living in a region of low prevalence of infection. Viral load was very low in all HBV infected subjects.     

A Simple Strategy to Look Back on Posttransfusion Hepatitis B in a Multitransfused Patient

Background and Objectives: In January 1996, a case of hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroconversion in a multitransfused patient was reported to the blood bank. From March through October 1995, the patient had received 23 units of red cells and 30 units of pooled platelet concentrates, encompassing an exposure to a total of 200 whole blood donations. Materials and Methods: In order to trace hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative but HBV-infectious blood donation(s), we tested samples of the donors obtained ≥3 months after the implicated donations for anti-HBc (Corezyme EIA, Abbott). From 172/200 donors, archived samples of subsequent donations were available for this purpose. The remaining 28 donors were reinvited to the blood bank to obtain an additional blood sample for anti-HBc testing. Results: 1/200 follow-up donor samples was anti-HBc-positive. Retrospective testing of the implicated HBsAg-negative blood donation of this donor revealed anti-HBc-negative and HBV-DNA-positive results. The patient was transfused with the platelets of the HBV-infectious donation. On looking back, the other blood products prepared from this HBV-infectious donation caused posttransfusion HBV infection (PT-HBV) in 2 additional patients. Conclusion: Anti-HBc testing on mainly archived follow-up samples of 200 donors implicated in PT-HBV was a rapid, simple, cost-effective and donor friendly method to identify an infectious but HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-negative and HBV-DNA PCR-positive blood donation. Routine anti-HBc screening would not have prevented this HBV transmission.     

Latent hepatitis B virus infection in healthy individuals with antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen

Several recent reports have shown that hepatitis B virus (HBV) could be frequently transmitted to the recipients from donors who have antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) through liver transplantation. We provide here the molecular evidence of latent HBV infection accompanied with ongoing viral replication in the liver tissue of anti-HBc-positive healthy individuals. HBV DNA was detectable in 13 of 14 healthy donors who were positive for both anti-HBc and antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), but in none of 3 who were positive for anti-HBs alone. The detected HBV genomes from these subjects included covalently closed circular DNA and pregenomic RNA, the replication intermediate of HBV. Notably, 5 of 7 cases tested were predominantly infected with wild type HBV strains without any mutations in the precore and core promoter regions under the presence of circulating antibody to hepatitis B e antigen. Interestingly, a predominant clone detected in one donor showed a 63-nucleotide deletion in the precore region including an encapsidation signal sequence. Our findings indicate that the majority of healthy individuals positive for anti-HBc, which had been assumed to denote a past history of transient HBV infection, were latently infected with the episomal form of HBV accompanied by ongoing viral replication and few nucleotide mutations in the precore and core regions.     

Inapparent “wild-type” and “e-minus variant” HBV infection in patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis

We analysed DNA extracted from liver biopsy specimens and serum samples from 42 HCV-RNA-positive/HBsAg-negative subjects with chronic hepatitis. Twenty-eight of them were anti-HBs/anti-HBc-positive (group A), while 14 were negative for all HBV markers (group B). HBV sequences were found in hepatic DNA of 12 cases (11 of group A, one of group B), but in the serum of only two cases of group A. Sequencing analysis of pre-core region of HBV-DNA showed the presence of wild-type HBV in three cases, HBeAg-defective HBV in three cases, and the coexistence of both viral populations in six cases. These results indicate that HBV and HCV infection may coexist in HBsAg-negative chronic hepatitis, particularly in anti-HBs/anti-HBc-positive patients. However, HBV replication appears suppressed in these cases, and this state of latency may involve both wild and HBeAg-defective HBV types.     

Levels of viraemia in subjects with serological markers of past or chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Subjects with serological markers for a past HBV infection may still have HBV DNA in their serum, but the levels of viraemia in such cases are not known. In the present study, of 63 consecutive HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive serum samples with or without anti-HBs, 20 were HBV DNA-positive as analysed by a highly sensitive quantitative PCR, the Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor test. However, all of these 20 samples had viraemia levels below 1000 copies/ml, compared with median viraemia levels of 10(8.6) and 10(4.3) copies/ml, respectively, in 98 HBeAg-positive and 124 HBeAg-negative HBsAg carriers. There was no difference in viraemia between subjects with anti-HBc alone compared with both anti-HBs and anti-HBc, nor between those with or without hepatitis C virus antibodies. The findings indicate that HBsAg-negative subjects may retain a low infectivity. Their risk for progressive liver damage is probably low, but this deserves further study.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection: implications in transfusion

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) presents a higher residual risk of transmission by transfusion than hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). While most infectious blood units are removed by screening for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), there is clear evidence that transmission by HBsAg-negative components occurs, in part, during the serologically negative window period, but more so during the late stages of infection. Donations negative for HBsAg, but positive for HBV DNA, with or without the presence of HBV antibodies, correspond to 'occult' HBV infection (OBI). The frequency of OBI depends on the relative sensitivity of both HBsAg and HBV DNA assays. It also depends on the prevalence of HBV infection in the population. OBI may follow recovery from infection, displaying antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and persistent low-level viraemia, escape mutants undetected by the HBsAg assays, or healthy carriage with antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe) and to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). Over time, in the latter situation, anti-HBe and, later, anti-HBc may become undetectable. The critical question is whether or not OBI is infectious by transfusion. All forms have been shown to be infectious in immunocompromised individuals, such as organ- or bone marrow-transplant recipients. In immunocompetent recipients, there is no evidence that anti-HBs-containing components (even at low titre) are infectious. Anti-HBc only, with HBV DNA, can be associated with infectivity, as can rare cases of HBV DNA without any serological HBV marker. If HBV nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) is considered, the OBI viral load would usually be < 500 IU/ml, making testing of plasma pools unsuitable unless the sensitivity of NAT significantly increases by genome enrichment or test improvement.     

Evidence that anti-HBc but not HBV DNA testing may prevent some HBV transmission by transfusion

Blood donor screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) implemented in some countries as a surrogate marker for non-A, non-B hepatitis has been superseded by anti-HCV screening. To assess the value of anti-HBc screening for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen-negative blood donations that might contain infectious HBV, HBV genomic detection and recipient testing were used. Blood donations were screened and confirmed by multiple anti-HBc assays. Donations containing isolated anti-HBc and those with anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) level < 0.1 IU/ml were tested for the presence of HBV DNA. Recipients of previous donations from the corresponding donors during the previous 5 years were traced and tested for markers of HBV infection. Of 103 869 donations screened, 586 (0.56%) were anti-HBc positive, two of which contained HBsAg, and 413 (0.4%) had protective (>/= 0.1 IU/ml) levels of anti-HBs. Anti-HBs < 0.1 IU/ml was found in 102 of these donations (0.1%) and isolated anti-HBc in 69 (0.07%). No donations with isolated anti-HBc were HBV DNA confirmed positive. Of 278 recipients of previous donations from 171 donors at risk of HBV carriage, 12 had markers of HBV infection. Six recipients had other identified risk factors. An association with blood transfusion was considered probable in two and possible in four recipients. None of the six corresponding donors had detectable HBV DNA 6-40 months after the implicated donation. The frequency of HBV transmission by chronic carriers negative for hepatitis B surface antigen was estimated in this study to be 1 in 52,000 donations (CI 0.3-7.8/100,000) from HBsAg-negative donors. Such HBV infectious donations may not be detected by DNA amplification.     

无偿献血人群隐匿性乙型肝炎病毒感染调查*

目的 调查无偿献血人群隐匿性乙型肝炎病毒感染(OBI)情况。方法 2021年1月～2021年12月我站无偿献血者血液样本107397份,采用两种ELISA法检测试剂盒进行HBsAg的初次筛查,采用核酸检测(NAT)法对两次HBsAg结果均为阴性的样本进行HBV DNA检测。对血清HBsAg阴性而HBV DNA阳性样本进行HBV血清学标志物检测,并采用实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(PCR)法检测核酸和病毒基因分型。 结果 在筛查的107397例无偿献血人群血样本中,经血清标志物检测后确认为OBI 者29例(0.27‰);血清抗-HBc阳性者12例(35.3%),抗-HBe/抗-HBc阳性者8例(23.5%),抗-HBs/抗-HBc阳性者6例(17.7%),抗-HBs/抗-HBe/抗-HBc阳性者3例(8.8%);19～29岁年龄段献血人群OBI感染率为0.09‰,30～39岁人群为0.32‰,40～49岁人群为0.39‰,50～55岁年龄段献血人群OBI感染率为0.41‰,且该年龄段重复献血者OBI感染率为0.31‰;血清抗-HBs/抗-HBc阳性和抗-HBs/抗-HBe/抗-HBc OBI献血者血清病毒载量>1000 IU/mL的占比分别为33.3%和66.7%,显著高于血清仅抗-HBc阳性者(0.0%,P<0.05)或血清抗-HBe/抗-HBc阳性者(0.0%,P<0.05);在29例OBI献血者中,C基因型占比为62.1%,B基因型感染占比为27.6%。结论 在初筛血清HBsAg 阴性的献血人群中,可能还存在很低比率的OBI人群,对用血安全提出了挑战。全面进行病毒核酸检测的花费-效益关系需要认真研究,提高常规ELISA检测方法的灵敏度也是关键。     

Anti-HBc screening in Indian blood donors：Still an unresolved issue

AIM：To study the seroprevalence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen （anti-HBc） in healthy blood donors negative for HBsAg and to evaluate whether anti-HBc detection could be adopted in India as a screening assay for HBV in addition to HBsAg. METHODS： A total of 1700 serum samples collected from HBsAg-negative healthy blood donors were tested for the presence of anti-HBc antibody （IgM ＋ IgG）. All samples reactive for anti-HBc antibody were then investigated for presence of anti-HBs and for liver function tests （LFTs）. One hundred serum samples reactive for anti-HBc were tested for HBV DNA by PCR method. RESULTS： Out of 1700 samples tested, 142 （8.4%） blood samples were found to be reactive for anti-HBc. It was signif icantly lower in voluntary （6.9%） as compared to replacement donors （10.4%, P = 0.011）. Seventy- two （50.7%） anti-HBc reactive samples were also reactive for anti-HBs with levels 〉 10 mIU/mL and 70 （49.3%） samples were non-reactive for anti-HBs, these units were labeled as anti-HBc-only. These 142 anti-HBc reactive units were also tested for liver function test. HBV DNA was detected in only 1 of 100 samples tested. CONCLUSION： Keeping in view that 8%-18% of donor population in India is anti-HBc reactive, inclusion of anti- HBc testing will lead to high discard rate. Anti-HBs as proposed previously does not seem to predict clearance of the virus. Cost effectiveness of introducing universalanti-HBc screening and discarding large number of blood units versus considering ID NAT （Individual donor nuclic acid testing） needs to be assessed.     

唐山地区献血人群隐匿性乙型肝炎病毒感染分析

目的了解唐山地区无偿献血人群隐匿性乙型肝炎感染情况。方法用ELISA法检测无偿献血者的乙型肝炎血清标志物,对于HBsAg阴性样本,进行HBV核酸检测（NAT）,NAT阳性样本,用罗氏试剂确证HBV DNA载量。结果共检测116 741例血样,证实隐匿性乙型肝炎感染者35例,占总献血人数的0.29‰。其中97.1%隐匿性乙型肝炎感染者样本的HBV DNA滴度低于102IU/ml。在HBV DNA阳性人群中,抗-HBc阳性率较高,占81.5%,抗-HBs阳性或乙型肝炎病毒血清标志物全阴性也可检出HBV DNA分别占55.6%和22.9%。结论唐山地区献血人群中血清HBsAg阴性者存在一定比例的隐匿性HBV感染,其HBV病毒载量均较低,核酸检测能够提高HBV感染的检出率。     

Sensitivity and specificity of Anti‐HBc screening assays – which assay is best for blood donor screening?

Compared to HIV and hepatitis C virus, the residual infectious risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) posed by blood products is about 10 times higher. In addition to HBsAg testing, screening for anti-HBc was recommended by the German Advisory Committee Blood in March 2005. Prevalence of anti-HBc in German blood donors was investigated at five test sites located in different geographic regions. In total, 12,000 blood donors were screened for anti-HBc by PRISM HBcore, and a statistically representative number of these were tested with Abbott Murex anti-HBc total, bioMérieux Hepanostika anti-HBc uniform, Bio-Rad Monolisa anti-HBc PLUS and Dade Behring Enzygnost anti-HBc. Anti-HBc repeat reactive samples were tested for anti-HBs, anti-HBe and HBV DNA by individual donation NAT. The mean prevalence of anti-HBc was 1.75% in donors that had not been tested for anti-HBc in the past. The percentage of anti-HBs in anti-HBc repeat reactive donors was 93.7%. Samples that were additionally reactive for anti-HBe were anti-HBc reactive in all tested assays. The sample to cut-off (S/Co) values for anti-HBc were lower (competitive assays) in samples that were also positive for anti-HBe, when compared to samples that were only anti-HBc reactive. Most commercially available anti-HBc assays provide sufficient sensitivity for routine screening purposes, and lacking specificity is no longer a serious issue for most of them. Assay differences were recognized for samples that were anti-HBc only reactive. The overall loss of 1.75% of positive testing donors can be significantly reduced to 0.45% by implementation of re-entry procedures for donors with an anti-HBs titre of over 100 IU/l and negative by sensitive ID-NAT.     

Prediction of occult hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplant donors through hepatitis B virus blood markers

Background

Occult hepatitis B virus infection is defined as detectable HBV-DNA in liver of HBsAg-negative individuals, with or without detectable serum HBV-DNA. In deceased liver donors, results of tissue analysis cannot be obtained prior to allocation for liver transplantation.

Aims

we investigated prevalence and predictability of occult hepatitis B using blood markers of viral exposure/infection in deceased liver donors.

Methods

In 50 consecutive HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive and 20 age-matched HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-negative donors, a nested-PCR assay was employed in liver biopsies for diagnosis of occult hepatitis B according to Taormina criteria. All donors were characterized for plasma HBV-DNA and serum anti-HBs/anti-HBe.

Results

In liver tissue, occult hepatitis B was present in 30/50 anti-HBc-positive (60%) and in 0/20 anti-HBc-negative donors (p < 0.0001). All anti-HBc-positive donors with detectable HBV-DNA in plasma (n = 5) or anti-HBs > 1,000 mIU/mL (n = 5) eventually showed occult infection, i.e, 10/30 occult hepatitis B-positive donors which could have been identified prior to transplantation. In the remaining 40 anti-HBc-positive donors, probability of occult infection was 62% for anti-HBe-positive and/or anti-HBs ≥ 58 mIU/mL; 29% for anti-HBe-negative and anti-HBs < 58 mIU/mL.

Conclusions

In deceased donors, combining anti-HBc with other blood markers of hepatitis B exposure/infection allows to predict occult hepatitis B with certainty and speed in one third of cases. These findings might help refine the allocation of livers from anti-HBc-positive donors.     

Occult hepatitis B virus among chronic liver disease patients in Yemen

ObjectiveTo estimate the rate of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).MethodsAfter an informed consent, sera samples were collected during April 2004 to April 2005 from 280 patients (200 male and 80 female). They were previously diagnosed with CLD based on history and ultrasound and were investigated for occult HBV infection. Sera were first screened for HBsAg and those which showed negative were tested for anti-HBc. The anti-HBc positive sera were further tested for anti-HBs to identify sera with isolated anti-HBc which in turn were subjected to HBV–DNA testing using PCR to determine the rate of occult HBV infection. Moreover, sera with occult HBV were tested for Anti-HCV and HCV-RNA using RT-PCR.ResultsHBsAg was detected in 44 of 280 (15.7%). Of 236 HBsAg negative sera anti-HBc was detected in 22 (9.3%). All anti-HBc positive sera were found to be anti-HBs negative. HBV–DNA was detected in 11 of 22 (50.0%) sera with isolated anti-HBc indicating occult HBV in 4.3% of all sera. None of the sera with occult HBV had anti-HCV or HCV-RNA.ConclusionsOccult HBV infection does exist among CLD patients in Yemen and the mechanism of its occurrence merits further investigation.     

Prevalence and time course of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus under immunosuppressive therapy

Objective

To clarify the prevalence and time course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus under immunosuppressive therapy.

Methods

We performed serological examination of 248 lupus patients to determine the presence of HBV, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc). Serum HBV DNA levels were measured in HBsAg-positive patients or resolved HBV carriers (HBsAg-negative, anti-HBs-positive, and/or anti-HBc-positive). If possible, we repeatedly performed examination of markers of HBV infection in resolved carriers.

Results

Two (0.8 %) patients were positive for HBsAg. Among 41 (16.5 %) patients who were considered as resolved HBV carriers, 1 (2.4 %) showed serum HBV DNA, which indicated occult HBV infection. The mean age and positive rate of anti-double stranded DNA antibody were significantly higher in resolved carriers than in anti-HBs- and anti-HBc-negative patients. Repeated examination showed that the anti-HBs and anti-HBc titer decreased below the threshold in 4 resolved carriers.

Conclusions

The prevalence of resolved HBV carriers in Japanese lupus patients was 16.5 %. Among them, occult HBV infection and decrease in anti-HBs and anti-HBc titer were observed. These findings indicated that all lupus patients should undergo serological examination for HBV before treatment. If patients have already been treated, we must carefully monitor their liver function, even when all HBV markers are negative.