Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve

As the elderly population in Japan increases, senile degenerative aortic valvular disease also tends to increase. These patients often have a small aortic annulus. The problem of “valve-patient-mismatch” occurs when a small prosthesis is inserted into a patient with a small aortic annulus. To avoid annular enlargement after aortic valve replacement (AVR), we tried to use a small-sized St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. From September 1988 through November 1996, 110 AVR were performed in our institution. In these cases, 30 underwent AVR with a small sized SJM valve (male ≦21 mm, female ≦19 mm). Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in 19 patients who had undergone AVR with a small-sized SJM valve. Surgical results were also compared between patients with small aortic annulus and those with normal-sized aortic annulus. Using Doppler echocardiography, pressure gradients (PG), cardiac index (CI), effective orifice area (EOA), and performance index (PI) were calculated at rest and during stress. The mean body surface area (BSA) of patient who had undergone AVR with SJM19A, 19HP and 21A was 1.40, 1.42 and 1.56 m², respectively. With dobutamine stress, heart rates, PG and CI increased significantly. Mean and maximum PG of patients with 19HP (8.0 and 15.4 mmHg at rest, 12.9 and 28.0 mmHg under stress, respectively) and 21A (9.5 and 19.1 mmHg at rest, 16.5 and 35.3 mmHg under stress, respectively) were relatively low. EOA index (EOAI) of patient with 19HP showed the highest values mean 0.93 cm²/m². Pis tended to be higher with HP models than with standard models. The tests were completed without significant side effects such as frequent ventricular arrhythmias. Among the cases with small aortic annulus, there were no operative deaths or hospital deaths. There were also no late deaths, episodes of hemorrhage or thrombosis. Conclusions. In our institution, AVR was peformed safely without any aortic annular enlargement with a small aortic anulus in small BSA patients. Postoperative hemodynamic data obtained by echocardiography were satisfactory for all patients at rest and even during maximum dobutamine stress test.     

Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve]

As the elderly population in Japan increases, senile degenerative aortic valvular disease also tends to increase. These patients often have a small aortic annulus. The problem of "valve-patient-mismatch" occurs when a small prosthesis is inserted into a patient with a small aortic annulus. To avoid annular enlargement after aortic valve replacement (AVR), we tried to use a small-sized St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. From September 1988 through November 1996, 110 AVR were performed in our institution. In these cases, 30 underwent AVR with a small sized SJM valve (male < or = 21 mm, female < or = 19 mm). Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in 19 patients who had undergone AVR with a small-sized SJM valve. Surgical results were also compared between patients with small aortic annulus and those with normal-sized aortic annulus. Using Doppler echocardiography, pressure gradients (PG), cardiac index (CI), effective orifice area (EOA), and performance index (PI) were calculated at rest and during stress. The mean body surface area (BSA) of patient who had undergone AVR with SJM19A, 19HP and 21A was 1.40, 1.42 and 1.56 m2, respectively. With dobutamine stress, heart rates, PG and CI increased significantly. Mean and maximum PG of patients with 19HP (8.0 and 15.4 mmHg at rest, 12.9 and 28.0 mmHg under stress, respectively) and 21A (9.5 and 19.1 mmHg at rest, 16.5 and 35.3 mmHg under stress, respectively) were relatively low. EOA index (EOAI) of patient with 19HP showed the highest values mean 0.93 cm2/m2. PIs tended to be higher with HP models than with standard models. The tests were completed without significant side effects such as frequent ventricular arrhythmias. Among the cases with small aortic annulus, there were no operative deaths or hospital deaths. There were also no late deaths, episodes of hemorrhage or thrombosis. Conclusions. In our institution, AVR was performed safely without any aortic annular enlargement with a small aortic anulus in small BSA patients. Postoperative hemodynamic data obtained by echocardiography were satisfactory for all patients at rest and even during maximum dobutamine stress test.     

Influence of St. Jude medical valve in patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus on cardiac function and late survival result

This clinical study analyzes our experience of postoperative cardiac function and long-term survival rate in patients with aortic stenosis and small-size St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Sixty-eight patients who underwent aortic valve replacement by SJM valve were divided into two groups by preoperative aortic annulus diameter. Group 1 consisted of 44 patients with small aortic annulus and small-size SJM valve (19 mm or 21 mm). In Group 1, small SJM standard valves were implanted in 16 patients, and small SJM Hemodynamic Plus (HP) valves were implanted in 28 patients. Group 2 consisted of 24 patients with large-size SJM standard valve (23 mm or larger). Preoperative left ventricular mass index, left ventricular dimension, the dimension of ascending aorta, and body surface area were significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2. Average age at surgery was older in Group 1 than in Group 2. Effective orifice area index of the SJM valve measured by the manufacturer's data was smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2. Postoperative left ventricular mass indexes of Group 1 (standard valve or HP valve) and Group 2 significantly decreased in comparison with the preoperative mass indexes. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction and the peak ejection rate of Group 1 were not different from those of Group 2. The 10 year survival rate of Group 1 was 79%, and the rate of Group 2 was 77%. At 10 years after surgery, freedom from valve-related complication of Group 1 was 80%, and freedom from complication of Group 2 was 81%. Our results demonstrated that small-size SJM valve afforded satisfactory long-term survival rate and valve-related event-free rate for elderly patients with small body surface area and small aortic annulus.     

Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of small Perimount aortic valves in patients aged 75 years or older

BACKGROUND: There is the potential for iatrogenic aortic stenosis and poor quality of life when small aortic valve bioprostheses are used in elderly patients. The alternative is enlarging the aortic annulus to accommodate larger size prostheses, increasing operative mortality. It was hoped that bovine pericardial valves would improve hemodynamic performance in the smaller valve sizes. METHODS: To determine long-term results and in vivo hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valves (Perimount) in elderly patients, we analyzed our follow-up and echocardiographic data from patients 75 years of age or older receiving isolated 19-mm and 21-mm Perimount valves. Ninety-four patients with a mean age of 77 +/- 2.2 years were followed for 12 years. Seventeen patients with 19-mm and 25 patients with 21-mm Perimount valves underwent transthoracic echocardiograms. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 6.3% (6 of 94). Twelve-year survival was 82.7%. Freedom from thromboembolism was 86.9% at 12 years. Two patients had anticoagulation-related bleeding. Overall New York Heart Association class decreased from 3 +/- 1 to 1.6 +/- 0.7 at the end of follow-up. Hemodynamic performances were satisfactory in both 19-mm and 21-mm Perimount valves, with low peak and mean transvalvular gradients and good effective orifice areas, orifice area indices, and performance indices. CONCLUSIONS: Perimount aortic valve in the small aortic annulus has yielded excellent long-term results and hemodynamic performances. Perimount is a very satisfactory option in elderly patients. Implantation of a Perimount bioprosthesis avoids enlargement of the small aortic annulus, reducing mortality and morbidity associated with this procedure.     

Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Short (< or =3 months)- and middle (> or =4 months)-term results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) bioprosthetic valves and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic (MM) bioprosthetic valves in patients with small aortic annulus were compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our facility, AVR was performed using bioprostheses in 110 patients from April 1999 to March 2006. Of these patients, 40 were treated using 19-mm CEP (Group C), and 9 using 19-mm MM (Group M). Evaluation by inquiry, physical examination, and echocardiography was performed before, a short term after, and a middle term after surgery, and the effects of AVR were compared. RESULTS: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class grade showed improvements in both groups. The aortic valve peak pressure gradient was 29.8 +/- 10.1 mmHg in Group C and 53.8 +/- 17.3 mmHg in Group M, being higher in Group M, a middle term after surgery. However, the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) showed improvements in both groups compared with the values before surgery, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was maintained. During the middle term after surgery, the frequency of cardiac events showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the patients treated with 19-mm MM, the aortic valve peak pressure gradient was higher than in those treated with 19-mm CEP, but acceptable improvements in the LVMI, maintenance of the LVEF, and avoidance of cardiac events were observed in both groups.     

Evaluation of St. Jude Medical valve's long-term function by Doppler echocardiography.

In this study, the long-term function of St. Jude Medical valve (SJM valve) is evaluated by Doppler echocardiography. The subjects were 191 patients who underwent mitral or aortic valve replacement using SJM valve in our institute since July 1978 and had no clinical problem showing more than 50% of left ventricular ejection fraction. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to measurement period (within 5 years, 10 years and 15 years and more), and further classified by size and their results were compared. In every group by size, there was no significant difference among groups by measurement period. In the mitral valve position, peak pressure gradient and pressure half-time were not significantly different among groups by size. On the other hand, in the aortic valve position, pressure gradient in 21-mm group was significantly high among 21-mm, 25-mm, and 27-mm groups, showing a negative correlation with size. As the result, it was suggested that SJM valve kept a good function more than 15 years after operation. From these results, it was considered that the patients with small annlus of the aortic valve needed annulus-enlarging procedure or use of Hemodynamic Plus series valves to keep the size of more than 23 mm.     

Hemodynamic assessment of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve compared with the St. Jude Medical valve in the aortic position using dobutamine-stress echocardiography

To assess the hemodynamic performance of the prosthetic valve in the aortic position, we examined dobutamine-stress echocardiography (DSE) to the patients underwent AVR with CEP valve or SJM valve. In 23 mm size, there were no significant differences between CEP group and SJM group in Peak velocity of the aortic jet (PV), peak pressure gradient (PPG) and effective orifice area (EOA). On the other hand, in 21 mm size, PV and PPG of the CEP group were significantly lower than those of the SJM group after DSE. The EOA of the CEP group was significantly larger than that of the SJM group after DSE. Our results suggest that the hemodynamic function of the CEP valve is superior to that of the SJM valve especially in small aortic annuli.     

Advantage of supra-annular patch enlargement in aortic stenosis with a small aortic annulus

BACKGROUND: We routinely perform supra-annular patch enlargement as a strategy to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients with a small aortic annulus who are undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHOD: We performed a retrospective review of 128 consecutive single AVR patients from 1999 to 2005. Of these, 34 patients underwent supra-annular patch enlargement. The enlargement was selectively performed in patients at risk of PPM. This involved patch extension of the aortotomy just above the annulus of noncoronary sinus, and valve implantation with stitches placed directly on the patch. Along with this procedure, AVR with a valve size appropriate to body surface area (BSA) was performed. RESULT: Of these patients, 74% were female and the mean BSA was less than 1.50 m2. The enlargement required an average of 33 minutes of additional aortic clamp time. The 30-day mortality was 0%. A favorable hemodynamic outcome was achieved. CONCLUSION: Our results show that supra-annular patch enlargement can be performed with minimal added risk, relative to standard root enlargement and a satisfactory hemodynamic status can be achieved by employing this procedure.     

Clinical evaluation of ATS prosthetic valve by doppler echocardiography: comparison with St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve.

ATS valve is a bileaflet valve developed to have a superior function to traditional prosthetic valves on anti-thrombogenesis and hemolysis. The orifice area was enlarged in consequence of making its orifice with pyrolytic carbon materials, and the pivot was open pivot and the strut was eliminated. The efficiency of this valve has been reported in the Europe. In Japan, its clinical trial was performed in September 1993 and its clinical use was permitted in August 1996. In this study, we compared the functions of ATS and St. Jude Medical (SJM) valves with echocardiography. The pressure gradients at the mitral valve position were not significantly different between ATS and SJM valves, but that of ATS was lower than that of SJM. The pressure gradient at the aortic valve position of ATS was also lower than that of SJM, and especially those of the patients who performed aortic valve replacement with 23-mm ATS and SJM valves were 8.9+/-1.6 and 23.3+/-6.6 mmHg, showing a significant difference. Though further observation and review of this valve are needed at the chronic phase, ATS valve is an excellent bileaflet valve on the valvular function, showing a low pressure gradient.     

Case report of a malfunctioning SJM 19 A aortic valve prosthesis requiring reoperation

The patient was a 56-year-old female diagnosed with poor lung function who had undergone an aortic valve replacement 10 years ago, receiving an SJM 19 A prosthetic valve. She suffered from dyspnea and chest pain with postural change. Her anticoagulation level was maintained therapeutic. A cinefluoroscopy showed that one of the leaflets in the prosthetic valve was not moving. The aortic peak pressure gradient was calculated to be 68 mmHg using Doppler echocardiography. The patient's clinical condition improved after thrombolytic therapy with urokinase, but a complete normalization of her prosthetic discs was not obtained, so the patient was treated surgically. After an aortotomy, a pannus formation covering the entire SJM 19 A valve was observed. The aortic annulus was estimated to be 16 mm in diameter after the excision of the SJM 19 A valve and required before a larger prosthesis could be inserted. A SJM 19 HP valve was then anchored to the enlarged annulus. Her postoperative course was uneventful. We report a case requiring reoperation after a small aortic mechanical valve prosthesis implanted 10 years previously was damaged by thrombosis and pannus. Pannus formation on small aortic prosthesis easily caused hemodynamic obstructions and mechanical failure. Intensive evaluation with Doppler echocardiography and cinefluoroscopy is required for such patients.     

Patient-prosthesis mismatch: the Japanese experience.

The concept of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was defined as existing "when the effective prosthetic valve area, after insertion into the patient, is less than that of a normal valve". However, based on the correlation between the mean transvalvular pressure gradient and the corrected effective orifice area (EOA), PPM is currently defined as an EOA corrected by a body surface area (BSA) of 65 years old, while supra-annular implantation of a bioprosthesis was done in patients >or=65 years old with a small aortic annulus. We discuss our present strategy after the introduction of a new high performance prosthesis, since the EOAs are dramatically increased.     

Aortic valve replacement for the small aortic annulus

Aortic valve surgery for the small aortic annulus is still challenging for surgeons. Recently, the new types of high performance prosthesis have been developed and the chance of an aortic root enlargement (ARE) is decreasing. In this study, we propose the ideal strategy of the aortic surgery for the small aortic annulus. We analyzed the clinical records of 158 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement from August 1999 to October 2005 in our institution. The small aortic annulus was observed in 38 patients (24%). Fourteen patients of this group underwent ARE. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was less frequently observed in patients with ARE compared to those without ARE. The additional time required for ARE was not considerable, and neither ischemic time nor cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly prolonged by ARE. In conclusion, we have to select a prosthesis with sufficient orifice area to avoid PPM, otherwise we should choose an option of ARE. For this consideration, we definitely need the chart that demonstrates the relationship between the nominal size of various types of prostheses and the size of a patient's annulus that those prostheses actually fit.     

Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves

OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamic performances of mechanical valve prostheses in patients with aortic valve stenosis and a small aortic annulus are crucial. We analyzed the in vitro hydrodynamics of 5 currently available bileaflet mechanical prostheses that fitted a 21-mm-diameter valve holder of a Sheffield pulse duplicator. METHODS: Three samples of 5 high-performance production-quality prostheses, including the sewing ring cuffs, were tested in the aortic chamber of a Sheffield pulse duplicator. Sizes of the prostheses fitting the 21-mm valve holder were as follows: 18-mm ATS, 19-mm SJM Regent, 19-mm Sorin Bicarbon Slimline, 19-mm On-X, and 21-mm Carbomedics Top Hat. The tests were carried out at a fixed pulse rate (70 beats/min) and at increasing cardiac outputs of 2, 4, 5, and 7 L/min. Each valve was tested 10 times for each different cardiac output. This resulted in a total of 40 tests for each valve and 120 tests for each valve model. The aortic pressure was set at 120/80 mm Hg (mean pressure, 100 mm Hg) throughout the experiment for all cardiac outputs. Forward flow pressure decrease, total regurgitant volume, closing and leakage volumes, effective orifice area, and stroke work loss were recorded while the valve operated under each cardiac output. RESULTS: The SJM Regent valve and the Sorin Bicarbon Slimline prosthesis showed the lowest mean and peak gradients at increasing cardiac outputs. The closure volume was higher for the SJM Regent and Sorin Bicarbon Slimline prostheses, unlike with the ATS prosthesis at 7 L/min of cardiac output. The ATS and SJM Regent prostheses showed the largest regurgitant volume, whereas the Sorin Bicarbon Slimline prosthesis showed the lowest regurgitant volume. The calculated effective orifice area and stroke work loss were significantly better with the SJM Regent and Sorin Bicarbon Slimline prostheses. CONCLUSION: Assuming that the 21-mm valve holder in which all the tested prostheses were accommodated is comparable with a defined aortic valve size, this hydrodynamic evaluation model allowed us to compare the efficiency of currently available valve prostheses, and among these, the SJM Regent and the Sorin Bicarbon Slimline exhibited the best performances.     

Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does gender matter?

OBJECTIVE: Ideal management of the elderly patient with a small aortic root remains controversial. This retrospective analysis was performed to determine whether small prosthetic valve size is related to outcome in patients 70 years of age or older undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. METHODS: Between December 1991 and July 1998, 366 patients 70 years of age or older (median age 77 years, range 73-81 years, 49% male) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass grafting with standard Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valves (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) (n = 277; 76%) or St Jude Medical mechanical valves (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) (n = 89; 24%). Propensity scoring and multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the risks associated with implantation of 19-mm valves. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 16.7% (17/102) in patients who received 19-mm valves and 3% (8/264) among those receiving >/=21-mm valves (P /=21-mm valves was 6.4 (95% CI 2.7, 15.4; P 相似文献   

Manouguian法瓣环增宽加主动脉瓣置换术治疗成人小主动脉瓣环

目的总结成人主动脉瓣狭窄伴小主动脉瓣环行瓣环增宽并替换主动脉瓣的经验。方法 12例病人行主动脉瓣环增宽并替换主动脉瓣。手术径路均采用Manouguian法：将主动脉斜切口下延伸,经无冠瓣与左冠瓣交界处向下,垂直切开瓣环至二尖瓣基部。采用绦纶片内衬自体心包片作为增宽材料,替换23 mm或25 mm主动脉瓣;同期行二尖瓣替换4例。结果 1例同期行二尖瓣置换者因严重低心排死于手术当晚;1例术后第7 d因心包填塞经剑突下引流后痊愈;肺部感染并发呼吸功能不全1例,经气管切开及呼吸机支持1周后痊愈;1例主动脉根部明胶海绵物填充后感染于术后12 d再次开胸清除腐烂明胶海绵,并留管冲洗引流而愈。本组术后住院13~20 d,平均（16.2±1.5）d;11例患者均获随访,时间5~84个月,平均（36.7±21.2）个月,心功能恢复至Ⅰ级5例,Ⅱ级6例,无远期死亡。结论对大多数小主动脉瓣环,采用Manouguian术式简单易行,不需切开二尖瓣基部,已能满足替换23 mm或25 mm瓣膜,增宽材料易得,效果可靠。     

Midterm results of Manouguian double valve replacement: comparison with standard double valve replacement

OBJECTIVE: Surgical strategies for patients who have a small aortic annulus associated with a small mitral annulus remain controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Manouguian procedure for double valve replacement with patch enlargement of the annuli. METHODS: We reviewed 57 consecutive patients who underwent double valve replacement for combined aortic and mitral disease between September 1991 and October 2000. Thirty patients underwent the Manouguian procedure with patch enlargement of the aortic and mitral annuli, and the other 27 patients had standard double valve replacement. The Manouguian procedure was selected for a small aortic annulus of less than 21 mm in diameter. The patients were followed for a median of 7.5 years. Results of echocardiography and the dobutamine stress test were compared postoperatively. RESULTS: Double valve replacement with the Manouguian procedure did not increase the early or midterm mortality because the survival (including operative death) at 8 years was 83% in the Manouguian group and 84% in the double valve replacement group (P = .82). The event-free rate at 8 years was 79% in the Manouguian group and 84% in the double valve replacement group (P = .6). The prostheses implanted at the aortic and mitral positions were smaller in the Manouguian group, even after annular enlargement. However, the transprosthetic gradient across the aortic valve evaluated by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography did not differ between the 2 groups, possibly because of a smaller body surface area in the Manouguian group. CONCLUSIONS: The Manouguian patch enlargement procedure is useful during double valve replacement when associated with the problem of small-valve annuli.     

Functional hemodynamic assessment of the 21-mm and 23-mm CarboMedics Top Hat aortic prosthetic valve

Between 1993 and 1996 the CarboMedics Top Hat supraannular aortic valve was implanted in 41 patients at the Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre (age, 39 to 74 years; mean, 61.3+/-8.9 years). Comparisons of annular dimensions made at surgery indicate that conventional annular valve replacement would have required at least a size smaller valve. This was particularly marked when a prosthetic mitral valve was in place. Operative mortality was 2.4%. There were also three late deaths. Echocardiography before and after symptom-limited treadmill testing has been performed in 21 patients. The mean time to follow-up was 16.1 months. The Doppler-derived indices of forward flow pre- and postexercise were expressed as mean+/-standard deviation. For 23-mm valves the values were: peak valve gradient 21.43+/-7.46 mm Hg and 35.86+/-14.4 mm Hg, aortic valve area 1.13+/-0.39 cm2 and 1.24+/-0.54 cm2. For 21-mm valves the values were: peak valve gradient 24.84+/-8.2 mm Hg and 31.29+/-5.84 mm Hg, aortic valve area 1.08+/-0.44 cm2 and 0.95 +/-0.2 cm2. The Top Hat valve has a good hemodynamic profile at rest and during exercise. Surgical considerations make it particularly useful in patients with a small aortic annulus and in patients undergoing combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.     

Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Implantation of St. Jude Medical Cardiac Valves in Small Aortic Roots

In this study, we analyzed the extent of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients who received small St. Jude Medical (SJM) aortic valves and compared the results with those of another group receiving larger valves. Eighty-eight patients received either 19 or 21 mm valves (Group 1, 25 patients) or either 23 or 25 mm valves (Group 2, 53 patients). Echocardiographic studies were done before the operation and 5 years postoperatively. At follow-up a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass was found for both patient groups (p < 0.0001). Doppler echocardiography derived pressure gradients for both groups were obtained during the follow-up period. As expected, the patients in Group 1 had higher peak pressure gradients than did those in Group 2. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups or any significant correlations between peak pressure gradients and body surface area (BSA). Actuarial survival was 84.7% at 15 years for Group 1 and 85.9% at 17 years for Group 2. Actuarial freedom from valve related events was 91.4 % at 15 years for Group 1 and 82.7% at 17 years for Group 2. There was no significant difference in survival or valve related event free curves between the 2 groups. After implantations of SJM valves in small aortic roots, significant left ventricular mass regression was obtained, and the results were comparable to those for valves of other sizes. The long-term performance of aortic valve replacement with small valves was satisfactory as judged by improvement in the functional class of patients and survival statistics, the durability of the prosthesis, and valve related morbidity comparable to that of valves of other sizes.     

Aortic valve replacement for calcified aortic valve and annulus with ultrasonic decalcification

We conducted ultrasonic decalcification on calcified annulus in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) using an ultrasonic operator, Sonopet (UST 2001) prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). We studied the reliability of this method. SUBJECT AND METHOD: From January 2002 to August 2005, AVR was conducted for AS using the Sonopet in 45 patients, comprising of 18 male and 27 female subjects. The mean age was 73.3 +/- 9.7. RESULT: Artificial valves were successfully inserted at the intra-annular level in 37 patients and at the supra-annular level in 8 patients without conducting annular enlargement. In the patients with narrow annuli of less than 19 mm (23 patients), the preoperative mean annular diameter was 18.2 +/- 1.0 mm, but significantly larger artificial valves with an average diameter of 19.3 +/- 1.5 mm (p=0.003) were successfully inserted. CONCLUSION: AVR was proved to be safe and easy by previous ultrasonic decalcification of the annuls using the Sonopet. This method was very useful because it required no enlargement of aortic annulus.     

Nicks operation for aortic valve dysfunction with pannus formation; report of a case

A 58-year-old female who underwent an aortic valve replacement 3 years ago was admitted to our hospital. She developed dyspnea in a month. Urgent reoperation was scheduled because an echocardiography demonstrated severe aortic valve regurgitation, and because a cinefluoroscopy showed that a leaflet of the prosthetic valve was restricted. Pannus formation from left ventricular outflow tract caused prosthetic valve insufficiency. An ATS 18 aortic prosthesis was replaced after removing old sewing cuff and surrounding tissue of the aortic annulus as much as possible. However, the coronary orifices were partially covered with the prosthesis. The leaflet rubbed onto the left ventricular outflow muscle specially in opening position. Therefore, an annular enlargement was required. In case of re-replacement of prosthetic valve for small aortic annulus, the annulus was at most same size or smaller than it of the previous operation. It was harmful for the patient whose body surface area was 1.74 m2 to utilize smaller prosthesis because of patient-prosthesis mismatch. We conclude that annular enlargement is useful for reoperarion of small aortic annulus associate with left ventricular outflow hypertrophy.