Measles vaccination for children with allergic diseases]

To predict the side effects of vaccination, some skin tests are performed for patients with allergic diseases, though at present time there is no standard method. We have performed skin tests of measles vaccine by prick test with undiluted vaccine, 1 : 10 dilution, and/or intradermal test with 1 : 100 dilution. 75 cases of children with allergic diseases were assessed with more than two types of these skin tests. The cases with negative response for the skin tests were subcutaneously administered with 0.5ml of vaccine at once (normal method). On the other hand, the cases with positive or+/-response at least one skin test were subcutaneously administered with the vaccine in increments of 0.05ml (divided method). Including+/-response, intradermal test with 1 : 100 dilution showed highest sensitivity (88%) and relatively high specificity (75%) for the prediction of side effects in the 3 types of skin tests. Forty nine cases were vaccinated with the normal method, and 26 cases were vaccinated with the divided method. Compared with the cases with normal method, the cases with divided method showed higher frequency for patients with the elimination therapy of foods besides egg, and significantly higher value of total IgE, and specific IgE for egg white, cow's milk, wheat, and cat dander. Twenty five of 26 cases with the divided method showed specific IgE for egg white>3.5UA/ml, and 8 of 11 cases showed specific IgE for cat dander>0.35 UA/ml. In 8 cases who appeared side effects (one was administered by t he normal method, and 7 were administered by the divided method), 7 cases were local skin reaction only, and there were no cases of anaphylaxis. We recommend that the intradermal test of dilution 1: 100 should be performed to determine the vaccination method. The cases with the elimination therapy of foods besides egg, cases with specific IgE for egg white>3.5UA/ml, or cases with specific IgE for cat dander>0.35UA/ml, should be considered as high risk patients.     

Recent pollen sensitization and its possible involvement in allergic diseases among children in a pediatric allergy clinic]

We studied the rate of sensitization to several pollen allergens as well as to house dust mites in 226 children visiting our pediatric allergy clinic during the past 3 years (from April 1996 to March 1999). The allergens studied were Sugi (Japanese cedar pollen, Cryptomeria japonica), Kamogaya (Dactylis gromerata), Butakusa (ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia), and Der f (house dust mite, Dermatophagoides farinae). The presence of nasal symptoms (either seasonal and perenial) was checked in 97 children visiting the clinic in March 1999. Overall average sensitization rates were 82.3% for Der f, 53.1% for Sugi, 38.5% for Kamogaya, and 17.1% for Butakusa. Among children aged 12 or more, sensitization rates for Sugi and Kamogaya were much higher (68.8%, 56.3%, respectively). Those who had seasonal nasal symptoms showed significantly higher rates of sensitization to the pollens. However, more than half of patients without nasal symptoms, 62.8% of whom had only atopic dermatitis (AD), also showed sensitization to the pollens. Several possible factors accounting for pollen sensitization in children with only AD and no sasal symptoms, such as existence of occult allergic rhinitis, future onset of allergic rhinitis, or pollen as directly aggravating factor of AD, need to be evaluated by careful follow-up of these cases.     

Association between sensitized to food allergens and childhood allergic respiratory diseases in Taiwan

BackgroundSensitization to allergen has long been known to be relate to childhood allergic diseases. Polysensitised children have more severe atopic diseases, whereas allergic rhinitis or asthma children with cosensitized to food and inhalant allergens were under-researched.ObjectiveTo realize the association between sensitization to food allergens and pediatric allergic rhinitis and asthma in Taiwan.MethodsWe included 138 participants with sensitized to allergen as assessed by serum-specific IgE. 87 of 138 participants had allergic rhinitis and 51 participants had asthma. All participants underwent a physical examination and measurement of serum total and specific IgE values. Besides, nasal peak expiratory flow rate (nPEFR) that was performed by the participants with allergic rhinitis and were requested to complete the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaires (PRQLQ). Lung function test and asthma control test (ACT)/child asthma control test (C-ACT) were performed by the participants with asthma.Results39 of 87 allergic rhinitis participants with sensitized to food and inhalant allergens (AR food group), 48 of 87 allergic rhinitis participants with sensitized to inhalant allergen alone (AR inhalant group). The AR food group had significantly lower nPEFR values and higher total IgE values (p < 0.05) compared with the AR inhalant group. The AR food group had higher PRQLQ scores than the AR inhalant group. 24 of 51 asthma participants with sensitized to food and inhalant allergens (Asthma food group), 27 of 51 asthma participants with sensitized to inhalant allergen alone (Asthma inhalant group). The Asthma food group had significantly higher total IgE values (p < 0.05) compared with the Asthma inhalant group. The Asthma food group had lower lung function test values and asthma control test (ACT) scores than the other group.ConclusionsChildren with cosensitized to food and inhalant allergens have more severe clinical symptoms and abnormal laboratory findings. Sensitization to food allergen was more related to pediatric allergic rhinitis than asthma. We may need larger, longer and extended studies to confirm these findings.     

Evaluation of latex allergy in patients with meningomyelocele.

Seventy-six patients with meningomyelocele were evaluated for latex sensitivity by medical history and epicutaneous skin testing. Four different latex glove extracts, two nonlatex glove extracts, cornstarch, selected inhalant antigens, and negative and positive controls were used for skin testing. Forty-nine patients (64.5%) were skin test positive to latex extracts (latex-positive group). Twenty-four patients (49%) of the latex-positive group and none of the latex-negative group had histories of immediate reactions to latex products (P less than .001). The latex-positive group had a higher mean number of surgical procedures, 12.67 +/- 11.27, compared with 6.89 +/- 6.55 (P less than .001) in the latex-negative group. Twenty-three of the latex-positive patients (47%) used latex products daily compared to seven patients (26%) in the latex-negative group (P = .073). Twenty latex-positive patients (41%) had atopy compared with five patients (19%) of the latex negative group (P = .041). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, daily catheterization, or positive skin tests to cornstarch. All 76 patients tested negative to the nonlatex glove extracts. Ten control subjects tested negative for all latex and nonlatex glove extracts.