Long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy in live donor kidney transplantation: a five-year prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy has not been addressed yet. We aim to evaluate its long-term effects in living related donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: 100 adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups--one group received basiliximab and the second served as a control. All patients received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine) and were closely followed for 5 years. RESULTS: Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) when compared to the control group (31/50) and in 5 years (27/50) when compared to (36/50) the controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the study was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable between the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patients and graft survival; 5-year patient and graft survival were 100 and 86% for basiliximab, and 96 and 88% for the control group respectively. CONCLUSION: Although routine basiliximab induction significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, its beneficial long-term effects on graft function and patient and graft survival are not yet evident.     

Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection in live-related-donor kidney transplantation: a three-year prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to investigate the benefit of basiliximab induction therapy in living-related-donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: One hundred adult recipients of a first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups, one to receive basiliximab and the second as a control. All patients received maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine). The patients were followed up for a minimum of three years. The end points for evaluation included the incidence of acute rejection episodes, severity of rejection, cumulative steroid dose, patients' and graft survival. RESULTS: Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) compared to the control group (31/50). At three years there were 26 acute rejections in the basiliximab group and 36 in control group. The cumulative steroid dose at three and 12 months was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic basiliximab is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in living-related-donor kidney transplantation.     

Outcomes after anti-thymocyte globulin vs Basiliximab induction before deceased donor kidney transplants

BackgroundDeceased donor kidney transplants represent an important source of renal replacement for the 100 000 patients initiating hemodialysis annually. We compared the association of induction therapy, anti-thymocyte globulin [rabbit] (rATG) or basiliximab, with posttransplant rejection, graft and patient survival.MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, we identified patients that received deceased donor kidney transplants. The outcomes analyzed were 6- month rejection, 1-year rejection, patient survival and graft survival. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to understand the association of induction therapy and rejection. Cox-proportional hazards models were constructed to ascertain the association of choice of induction therapy with both patient and graft survival.ResultsOf 45 339 patients, 33 906 patients received rATG induction therapy and 11 433 patients received basiliximab induction therapy. The rATG group were younger (53.44 years vs 55.28 years, P < 0.001), more frequently female (58.74% male vs 66.08%, P < 0.001) and more frequently Black (34.78% vs 25.66%, p < 0.001) compared with patients in the basiliximab group.Rejection was more likely with basiliximab compared with rATG at 6 months(OR = 1.64, P < 0.001; 7.81% Basiliximab vs 5.23% rATG)and at 12 months (OR = 1.56, P < 0.001; 8.81% Basiliximab vs 6.31% rATG). Basiliximab induction therapy was associated with worse patient survival, (HR = 1.05, P = 0.017). Basiliximab induction therapy was associated with worse graft survival, (HR = 1.03, P = 0.037).ConclusionThe analysis of the national experience demonstrated favorable rejection, patient survival, and graft survival with rATG usage. Further prospective data are necessary to provide treatment recommendations.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Basiliximab Induction—Long-Term Results

This study examined alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and basiliximab (anti-CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone-free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (<3 months) rejection was observed in the alemtuzumab (4.1%) versus the basiliximab (11.6%) group, but the rates for both groups were equivalent at 1 year. Patient and kidney survival and rejection rates were nearly identical between Caucasians and African Americans that received alemtuzumab. Quality of renal function and incidence of infectious complications were similar in the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy was similar in efficacy to basiliximab in a prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol for an ethnically diverse population of kidney transplant recipients.     

Induction immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: does basiliximab make the difference?

The optimal prophylactic induction immunosuppressive therapy to prevent renal transplant rejection remains controversial. Recently, basiliximab efficiency has been reported in several studies. We sought to evaluate the efficiency of induction immunosuppressive therapy with basiliximab in renal transplantation in our unit based upon the acute rejection rate, patient and graft survivals, first hospital admission length, and incidence of infectious or malignant complications during 4 years of follow-up. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of two groups of renal transplant recipients treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone) without (group 1, 149 patients) or with (group 2, 104 patients) induction immunosuppression with basiliximab. The two groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, number of hypersensitized patients, cold ischemia time, or donor age. The group receiving basiliximab displayed a significantly lower acute rejection rate (7.6% vs 24%, P = .001) and shorter first hospital admission (14.4 +/- 8 vs 19.5 +/- 11 days). There was no difference in graft or patient survival, death due to sepsis, or incidence of posttransplant malignancies. Although there was no difference in graft or patient survival, immunosuppressive induction therapy with basiliximab yielded a significant reduction in the acute rejection rate.     

Opportunistic Infections After Induction With Alemtuzumab or Basiliximab: A 3-Year Kidney Transplantation Experience

BackgroundAntibody induction immunosuppression is commonly used in kidney transplantation to decrease the risk of early acute rejection. However, infectious complications may arise in patients treated with higher intensity induction immunosuppression. In this study, we compared the rate of opportunistic infections during the 3 years after kidney transplantation in recipients who received either alemtuzumab or basiliximab for induction therapy.MethodsAll renal transplant recipients from our center who received induction with alemtuzumab between 2011 and 2016 were included and matched 1:2 (by age and date of transplant) to renal transplant recipients who received basiliximab. The primary outcome was the rate of opportunistic infections.ResultsTwenty-seven patients received alemtuzumab (mean age = 50.8 years; SD ±12), and 54 received basiliximab (mean age = 50.8 years; SD ±11.8). Infections within 3 years posttransplant were not different between groups: BK viremia (P = .99), BK nephritis (P = .48), cytomegalovirus infection (P = .13), varicella zoster virus (P = .22), and all infections (P = .87). Time to infection (P = .67), patient survival (P = .21), and time to rejection (P = .098) were similar in both groups. There were also no group differences in delayed graft function (P = .76), graft loss (P = .97), or rejection (P = .2).ConclusionThe rate of infection was not significantly increased in recipients receiving lymphocyte-depleting alemtuzumab compared to recipients receiving basiliximab induction therapy, despite receiving similar maintenance immunosuppression. Although the immunologic risks differed between the 2 groups, there was no observable difference in clinical outcomes.     

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity-matched analysis

Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO-compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death-censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity-matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49–0.96)] and non-significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90–1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72–4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab-treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl ].     

Is it worth using daclizumab induction therapy with mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive regimens in live related donor kidney transplantation? A long-term follow up

Background/Aims The aim of this work is to determine the long-term therapeutic benefit(s) of daclizumab induction therapy with triple immunosuppressive protocols including prednisolone, cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the living related donor kidney transplantation. Methods Twenty-one adult recipients of their first kidney allograft were allocated to receive daclizumab with triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, CsA, and MMF). They were compared to 50 recipients of their first grafts who received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, CsA, and azathioprine). The patients were followed up for 5 years. Results Daclizumab group significantly experienced a marked reduction of acute rejection (7/21) when compared to the control group (31/50) with subsequent significant reduction of cumulative steroids doses at the end of 5 years. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable among the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patients and graft survival; 5-year patient and graft survival were 95.3%, 85.7% for daclizumab and 96%, 88% for control group, respectively. Conclusions Although prophylactic daclizumab with triple immunosuppressive protocol including MMF have drastically reduced the incidence of acute rejections, the graft and patient survival are unchanged in this long-term follow up.     

Safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal two days after kidney transplantation: analysis of results at three years

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in spite of myriad side effects is widely used in kidney transplantation. This prospective controlled study evaluated safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal at 2 days in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy. METHODS: In all, 300 kidney recipients were studied; 150 in second-day steroid withdrawal group and 150 in steroid treated group (control group). Immunosuppression was basiliximab induction and maintenance was a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was treated by methylpredisolone. Surveillance biopsies were completed to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Primary end point was acute rejection. Three-year patient and graft survival, new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were evaluated. RESULTS: Acute rejection was diagnosed in 14% in control group and 16% in steroid withdrawal group. Three-year patient and graft survival was 89% and 79% in control and 91% and 78% in steroid withdrawal group. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance was 1.9+/-0.8 and 59+/-11 in control group and 1.8+/-0.9 mg/dl and 61+/-10 mls/minute in steroid withdrawal group. Incidence of SCAR and progression of CAN were comparable in the 2 groups. At 3-years NODM was diagnosed in 21% in control group and 4% in steroid withdrawal group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Two-day steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients did not affect BPAR, SCAR, CAN, graft function and patient and graft survival compared to control group up to 3 years. NODM was significantly less in steroid withdrawal group. Two-day steroid withdrawal is safe and beneficial in kidney transplant recipients.     

Historical controlled trial of OKT3 versus basiliximab induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas-renal transplantation

SUMMARY:   Simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplant recipients are at high immunological risk of rejection. Antibody induction is beneficial but lymphocyte-depleting therapy is associated with a high incidence of side-effects. We performed a historical controlled trial to compare OKT3 versus anti-CD25 antibody (basiliximab) induction therapy with regard to patient, kidney and pancreas survival, as well as to examine for any differences in acute rejection, graft function, and infective complications. Twenty-eight consecutive SPK transplants were performed at the Monash Medical Centre between December 1997 and November 2001. Anti CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) was used prior to March 2000 ( n  = 12) and basiliximab was used after ( n  = 16), both in combination with cyclosporin, mycophenolate, and prednisolone. A retrospective comparison of outcomes was performed. At 6 months, patient (100 vs 100%), kidney (91.7 vs 91.7%) and pancreas (75 vs 83.3%) survival were similar in the OKT3 and basiliximab groups, respectively. A minority of subjects in each group remained free from rejection (42% basiliximab vs 25% on OKT3, P  = NS). Renal function was superior in the basiliximab group (mean calculated creatinine clearance 79.4 ± 11.9 vs 54.5 ± 15.9 mL/min for  basiliximab vs OKT3, P  < 0.001). The incidence of major opportunistic infection was lower in basiliximab-treated patients (9 vs 50% in the OKT3 group, P  = 0.033). Basiliximab was associated with similar 6-month patient, kidney and pancreas survival, superior renal function and less opportunistic infection as compared with OKT3 induction therapy in SPK transplants. Basiliximab is at least as effective and is safer than OKT3 for induction therapy in SPK transplantation.     

Low-dose Thymoglobulin vs Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Low-Risk Living Related Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Trial

ContextThymoglobulin is used effectively as induction agent in kidney transplantation but the optimal dose is not well established.ObjectiveDemonstrate that low-dose thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) has similar efficacy and safety compared to basiliximab induction in low-risk kidney transplantation under standard maintenance immunosuppressionDesign, Setting, ParticipantsProspective randomized study in kidney transplant patients (12/2016-05/2018). Inclusion criteria: Recipients > 18 years, first living donor transplant. Exclusion criteria: Second and multiorgan transplant, ABO incompatibility, positive cross-match, panel reactive antibodies (PRA) > 30%, positive donor-specific antibody, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus positive, white blood cells < 2000 cells/mm³, platelets < 75,000 cells/mm³ and malignancy.InterventionGroup A: basiliximab (20 mg D0 and D4). Group B: thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg total). Maintenance immunosuppression: tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.Main Outcome MeasuresBiopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), delayed graft function, slow graft function, leukopenia, infections, adverse events, graft loss, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and death within 12 months.Results100 patients (basiliximab, n = 53) (thymoglobulin, n = 47) were included. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar except for longer dialysis (basiliximab), PRA class I (1.2% basiliximab, 4.5% thymoglobulin), HLA match (basiliximab 2.8, thymoglobulin 2.2), and cytomegalovirus status. BPAR rate was basiliximab 3.8% and thymoglobulin 6.4% (P = ns). Delayed graft function (basiliximab 3.8%; thymoglobulin 4.3%), slow graft function, and 12-month leukopenia (basiliximab 11.3%, thymoglobulin 21.3%) were similar between groups (P = ns). There was no difference in infections and adverse events between groups. Patient and graft survival were as follows: basiliximab 98.1% and 92.5%, thymoglobulin 100% and 93.6% (P = ns).ConclusionLow-dose thymoglobulin induction (3 mg/kg) can be used effectively and safely in low-risk kidney transplantation with good results during the first year post-transplant.     

Long-term evaluation of single bolus high dose ATG induction therapy for prophylaxis of rejection in live donor kidney transplantation

Background/Aims The long-term evaluation of single bolus high dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy has not been adequately studied. We aimed to evaluate its long-term effects in the living related donor kidney transplantation. Methods Eighty adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two equal treatment groups, one group received intraoperative single bolus rabbit ATG in a dose of 9 mg/kg and the second group served as a control. All patients were maintained on triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, calcineurin inhibitor and antiproliferative agent). We followed them thoroughly for minimum of 5 years. Results ATG significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced acute rejection episodes in the first year (9/40) when compared to the control group (26/40) and in 5 years (11/40) when compared to (30/40) in controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the study was significantly lower in the ATG group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable among the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival: 5 year survival was 100% and 85% for the ATG group, and 95% and 92.5% in the control group, respectively. Conclusion Although routine single bolus ATG induction significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, its long-term beneficial effects on graft function and patient and graft survival are not evident.     

Basiliximab induction in adult liver transplant recipients with 93% rejection-free patient and graft survival at 24 months

Induction with the use of interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies may avoid many of the adverse events associated with polyclonal antibodies and significantly impact on rejection-free long-term survival in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). We describe our experience with the use of basiliximab induction therapy in adult OLTx recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Forty-six consecutive deceased donor primary OLTx were analyzed. All patients received standard doses of basiliximab, tacrolimus, and steroids. Mycophenolate mofetil was also used as indicated. The mean follow-up period was 17.9 months. Forty-three patients remained rejection-free during follow-up. The actuarial patient and graft survival rate at 2 years was 93%. The rate of histology-proven hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence was 24%, with two progressing to severe cholestatic recurrent HCV. None of the study patients developed (cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Results were compared to a historical group of 46 OLTx recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression without basiliximab induction. The historical group had a rejection rate of 34% with lower patient and graft survival rates of 71.74% and 69.5%, respectively, at 24 months as well as a higher histological HCV recurrence rate of 77% (17/22), with three patients progressing to graft failure within 2 years. CMV infection and disease developed in 4.5% of the patients. Although PTLD was not observed, three recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed and died of metastatic HCC. Induction with basiliximab in combination with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen reduces the incidence of rejection and improves rejection-free survival rate after OLTx without increasing the incidence of CMV, PTLD, or HCV recurrence.     

Long-term Follow-up of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in Freiburg,Germany: A Single-Center Outcome Report

BackgroundABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) is an established way to enlarge the donor pool around the world. Comparability of long-term success and complications to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABOc-KT) are still under debate.MethodsWe evaluated all patients with a living donor kidney transplantation performed between April 1, 2004, and March 31, 2019.ResultsA total of 137 ABOi-KT and 346 ABOc-KT were analyzed. We excluded 4 ABOi-KT recipients and 178 ABOc-KT recipients with cyclosporine A–based immunosuppression or without basiliximab induction. Three patients of the ABOi-KT cohort and 6 patients of the ABOc-KT cohort were lost to follow-up and therefore excluded. The patient characteristics were comparable except for the higher age of transplant recipients in the ABOc-KT cohort and longer follow-up of the ABOi-KT cohort. The mean estimated 15-year recipient survival was 89% in the ABOi-KT cohort and 91% in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .39). Mean estimated graft survival was 71% in the ABOi-KT cohort and 87% in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .68). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) measured in the last follow-up was 51 mL/min/1.73 m² in the ABOi-KT cohort and 50 mL/min/1.73 m² in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .36). The incidence for antibody-mediated rejection, T cell–mediated rejections, and infectious complications requiring hospitalization was not different between the cohorts. In the ABOi-KT cohort, we found significantly more lymphoceles and consequent surgical revision procedures.ConclusionsAt our center, ABOi-KT has as good long-term results as ABOc-KT in terms of patient survival, graft survival, and complications, with the exception of increased lymphocele formation.     

Outpatient Management of Delayed Graft Function Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay Without an Increase in Adverse Events

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common and costly complication of kidney transplantation. In July 2011, we established a multidisciplinary DGF clinic managed by nurse practitioners to facilitate early discharge and intensive management of DGF in the outpatient setting. We compared length of stay, 30‐day readmission, acute rejection, and patient/graft survival in 697 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplantations performed between July 2009 and July 2014. Patients were divided into three groups: no DGF (n = 487), DGF before implementation of the DGF clinic (n = 118), and DGF clinic (n = 92). Baseline characteristics including age, gender, panel reactive antibody, retransplantation rates, HLA mismatches, induction, and maintenance immunosuppression were not significantly different between pre‐ and post‐DGF clinic groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in pre‐DGF clinic (10.9 ± 6.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1 days, p < 0.001). Thirty‐day readmission (21% vs. 16%), graft loss (7% vs. 20%), and patient death (2% vs. 11%) did not differ significantly between pre‐ and post‐DGF clinic. Patients in the DGF clinic were less likely to develop acute rejection (21% vs. 40%, p = 0.006). Outpatient management of DGF in a specialized clinic is associated with substantially shorter hospitalization and lower incidence of acute rejection without significant difference in 30‐day readmission or patient and graft survival.     

Everolimus with low‐dose tacrolimus in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

The efficacy and safety of everolimus (EVR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT) is unclear. We retrospectively evaluated 25 consecutive SPKT recipients at our center from November 2011 to March 2013. All patients received dual induction (Thymoglobulin/basiliximab) and low‐dose tacrolimus plus corticosteroids. Nine patients who received EVR were compared with 14 patients who received enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS); two patients who received sirolimus were excluded from the analysis. With a median follow‐up of 14 months, the pancreas graft survival rate was 100% in both groups, and the kidney graft survival rate was 100% and 93% in EVR and EC‐MPS patients, respectively. One EC‐MPS patient lost her kidney graft from proteinuric kidney disease. Another EC‐MPS patient received treatment for clinically diagnosed pancreas and kidney graft rejection. No rejection was observed in EVR patients. Serum creatinine and HbA1c levels were similar between the groups. There was no significant difference of surgical or medical complications. In conclusion, EVR seems to provide comparable short‐term outcome to EC‐MPS when combined with low‐dose tacrolimus/steroids and dual induction therapy. A larger study with a longer follow‐up is required to further assess this combination.     

Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus

INTRODUCTION: Small bowel transplantation has been limited by high rates of rejection and graft loss. In June 2000, we began using sirolimus, an immunosuppression agent with proven efficacy in kidney transplantation. We reviewed results among intestinal transplant recipients before and after the introduction of sirolimus. METHODS: Thirty-one intestinal transplants were performed in 29 patients at our center between July 1998 and April 2001. All patients were followed for at least 30 days posttransplant. In the first 19 transplants (group 1), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and antibody induction therapy (either daclizumab or OKT3). In the next 12 consecutive transplants (group 2), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, basiliximab, and sirolimus. RESULTS: Eighteen children (7 males and 11 females, mean age 2.1+/-2.2 years) and 11 adults (9 males and 2 females, mean age 38.1+/-12.4 years) underwent transplantation. All patients survived transplantation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.7 procedures per patient in group 1 and 1.1 procedures per patient in group 2. The most common indications were abscess (n=7), planned second look (n=7), leaks/fistulas (n=6), dehiscence (n=6), obstruction (n=4), ischemic bowel (n=3), perforations (n=3), stomal complications (n=3), and graft removal (n=3). The incidence of biopsy-proven rejection in the first 30 days was 73.7% in group 1 and 16.7% in group 2 (P<0.002). Sirolimus was temporarily held or discontinued in 66.7% of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 57.9% without sirolimus (P<0.04). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 79% without sirolimus (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: An immunosuppressive regimen that includes sirolimus has improved graft survival. Furthermore, this regimen has significantly decreased the incidence of early rejection and has eliminated early graft loss caused by fulminant rejection.     

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.     

Outcome of pediatric renal transplantation in Labfi Nejad Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for children with end-stage renal disease. In Iran, a kidney transplantation program was started in the Labfi Nejad Hospital, Tehran in 1985. From 1985 to 2003, 278 children (mean age 11.6 years, 59.7% males) received their first renal transplant. All transplants were donations from live donors (12.5% live-related donors); 30.8% of patients were preemptively transplanted. The overall 1-year patient survival rate was 92% and the 5-year survival rate 74%. The median graft survival time was 7.2 years. The rate of graft survival was 88.8% at 1 year, 77% at 3 years, 67% at 5 years, 50% at 7 years, and 43% at 10 years after transplantation. The survival rate of patients and transplants improved significantly with time (p<0.05). In patients transplanted before 1997, the 5-year graft survival was 50% and 82% in patients transplanted after 1997. At the same time intervals, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 66.6 versus 40.8% and of chronic rejection 50.5 versus 28.7%. The outcome in children below the age of 6 years was poor. Graft survival was negatively correlated with the frequency and an early time point of acute rejection episodes. The modus of transplantation (preemptive or postdialysis) did not influence the results. In conclusion, patient and graft survival in transplanted children significantly improved with time, thus reflecting greater medical and surgical experience, new immunosuppressive drugs, and better compliance.     

Renal retransplantation: a retrospective monocentric study

Approximately 10% to 20% of all annual renal transplantations are retransplantations and up to 20% of patients on waiting lists need a repeat kidney because of previous graft failure. The immunological risk is much greater among retransplanted patients than first-time kidney recipients. It is likely that retransplantation will become even more prevalent in the future. However, clinical studies or retrospective data are rare in this patient population. We retrospectively investigated 50 recipients after second or third renal transplantations in our center since 2001. Immunosuppression was performed with corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and induction therapy with either thymoglobulin (2.5 mg/kg body weight; n = 27) or 20 mg basiliximab on days 0 and 4 (n = 22) after renal transplantation; 1 patient was treated with antithymoglobulin Fresenius after combined liver-kidney transplantation. Acute rejection occurred in 12 recipients (44.4%) after thymoglobulin and in 7 recipients (31.8%) after basiliximab induction therapy (P < .05). In 4 (14.8%) thymoglobulin- and 5 (22.7%) basiliximab-treated recipients, vascular rejections were observed (P = NS). Patients with basiliximab treatment showed improved renal function at 1 year after transplantation: serum creatinine 134.3 mumol/L versus 199.6 mumol/L in the thymoglobulin group (P < .05). Over the observation period the renal function remained stable or improved in both groups if rejection treatment was successful. However, allograft failure was higher in the basiliximab-treated group, namely, 18.1% versus 14.8% in thymoglobulin-treated patients, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In 3 (11.1%) thymoglobulin- and 4 (18.2%) basiliximab-treated patients cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections complicated the follow-up (P = NS). In the follow-up period of 5 years, no malignant diseases were seen in either group. Three basiliximab-treated recipients died in the first year due to sepsis or cardiovascular complications. Two thymoglobulin-treated patients developed BK virus nephropathy in the follow-up period. In conclusion, we observed a high immunological risk and rejection risk among retransplanted kidney recipients in our center. Particularly, severe vascular rejections with a harmful long-term impact on allograft function were observed in this population. Induction treatment seems to be successful to reduce risk and achieve better results. Single-shot thymoglobulin may be preferable to reduce severe vascular rejection and prevent allograft failure than basiliximab with the same infection rate.