The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in chronic abdominal pain

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal adhesions seem to be a possible cause of chronic abdominal pain, but reports of their etiological role are controversial. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis has been proposed as treatment of choice, even tough reports of success are contradictory. The aim of our prospective study, was to determine whether laparoscopic adhesiolysis ameliorates chronic abdominal pain in patients with pathological abdominal adhesions. METHODS: Forty-five patients with chronic abdominal pain, lasting for more than 6 months, without abnormal findings other than pathological intraperitoneal adhesions found at laparoscopy, underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (91.1%) were available for follow-up after an average time interval of 18 months (range: 12-41 months): 24 patients (58.5%) were free from abdominal pain; 10 (24.4%) reported significant amelioration of pain, while 7 (17.1%) patients had no amelioration. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is an efficient means of assessing patients with chronic abdominal pain, and laparoscopic adhesiolysis cures or ameliorates. Chronic abdominal pain in more than 80% of patients.     

Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain

Background: The surgical treatment of patients with chronic abdominal pain resulting from intraabdominal adhesions is controversial. We report our experience with treatment of this challenging patient population using laparoscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) and placement of Seprafilm (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA). Methods: The participants in this study were 19 consecutive patients (2 men and 17 women) who underwent laparoscopic LOA and placement of Seprafilm between July 1998 and July 2001. Patients with abdominal pain resulting from irritable bowel syndrome, hernias, or endometriosis were excluded. The patients had undergone a mean of 6.4 previous abdominal procedures (range, 1–14) and 2.3 previous LOAs (range, 0–10). They had experienced chronic, intractable abdominal pain for at least 4 months (range, 4–180). Eight patients had preoperative obstructive symptoms. Results: A completely laparoscopic procedure was used to treat 16 patients, whereas the procedure for 3 patients was converted to open surgery because of dense adhesions. Perioperative complications included two patients in whom enterocutaneous fistulae developed and one patient with intraabdominal hematoma. At follow-up (mean, 9.6 months; range, 1–32 months), 14 patients (73.7%) had completely discontinued all pain medications. At this writing, 12 of these patients are completely symptom free. Two patients are taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as needed, and three patients require round-the-clock narcotics. Three patients were readmitted with small bowel obstruction, which was managed nonoperatively. One patient had diagnostic laparoscopy for recurrent pain 6 months postoperatively, but had no adhesions. Conclusion: Chronic intractable abdominal pain is relieved in most patients via this approach. Repeat laparoscopy in two patients showed no intraabdominal adhesions. Laparoscopic LOA and placement of Seprafilm is an excellent approach to this challenging patient population with symptoms caused by intraabdominal adhesions.     

A prospective analysis of predictive factors on the results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain is subject for criticism. In this prospective study, we analyze factors that encourage or discourage the indication for therapeutic laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with chronic abdominal pain underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and in case of adhesions, they underwent adhesiolysis. Pain relief was assessed, and the individual impact of variables on pain relief was determined. Laparoscopy was performed in 224 patients. Two hundred patients had only adhesions and underwent primary laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Three months after adhesiolysis, 74% of patients were pain-free or had less pain. The remaining 26% of the patients felt no change (22%) or had more pain (4%). Gender, age, and bowel perforation leading to a laparotomy appear to be individual factors significantly influencing pain relief. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis can be done (almost) completely in 92% of patients with adhesions. After laparoscopic adhesiolysis, 74% of patients had good results and 4% had more pain. The complication rate is high.     

Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction,pain, and infertility

Adhesions cause bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. In this review, the incidence, clinical signs, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of these sequels of abdominal surgery are discussed. Laparoscopic treatment of bowel obstruction, chronic pain, and infertility is feasible in selected patients and has been reported to cause fewer newly formed adhesions. Randomized controlled trials to compare open and laparoscopic surgery for adhesions should be executed with long-term follow-up to assess the success rates of adhesiolysis and compare the morbidity and mortality.     

Is laparoscopic treatment of adhesions a valid approach for postoperative abdominal pain?

The role of post-operative adhesions in chronic abdominal pain remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the value of laparoscopic treatment of adhesions for chronic post-operative abdominal pain in 32 patients. Over a period of 8 years, 32 patients (25 women and 7 men) with a mean age of 41.5 years (18-69) were hospitalized for chronic abdominal pain of more than 6 months duration, without an obvious underlying neoplasm or psychiatric disorder. They had all undergone at least one previous abdominal operation (mean, 1.9; range, 1-5), with a mean follow-up of 28 months (6-82). The mean duration of the pain was 18 months (6-65) and in 24 of the 32 cases it was mainly hypogastric. Other than the presence of a scar, the clinical examination was completely normal. Prior to hospitalization, 163 different laboratory tests, 162 radiological investigations, including 13 CT scans and 3 MRIs, and 25 endoscopies had been performed. A pneumoperitoneum was made by "open laparoscopy" in 23 cases and with Verres needle in 9 cases. Eight patients (25%) did not have any adhesions, but 6 of them were found to have a gynecological problem (endometriosis). In this group, the laparoscopy lasted 34 minutes (15-45) and the mean hospital stay was 48 hours. In 24 cases, adhesions were found and selected. This was thought to be complete in 22 cases (91.6%). There was a strict correlation between the adhesions and the scar in 85% of cases. In 5 cases, the adhesions were associated with another intervention. There were no conversions. The mean duration of surgery and hospitalization was respectively 56 minutes (32-120) and 3.2 days. There was no mortality and the morbidity rate was 4.1% (1 monopolar injury). The average follow-up was 26.7 months: 22 of the 24 patients who had freeing of adhesions were evaluated after at least 6 months of follow-up. In 10 cases, the pain had completely resolved (45%), in 6 it had decreased (27%) and in 6 cases it was unchanged or had even worsened (1 case of endometriosis). Laparoscopic exploration for chronic post-operative abdominal pain, after an extensive work-up performed after a suitably long delay post-surgery, can be used to detect and treat adhesions in 3/4 cases. In the absence of another lesion, the pain is lessened in 72% cases. However, if there is another lesion, laparoscopic treatment of adhesions is less effective with respect to the pain, but it nevertheless can identify an.     

An evaluation of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether laparoscopic adhesiolysis ameliorates chronic abdominal pain in patients with abdominal adhesions. Forty-five patients with chronic abdominal pain lasting for more than 6 months but with no abnormal findings other than adhesions found at laparoscopy underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Thirty-six patients (80%) were available for follow-up after a median time interval of 10 months (range: 6–36 months). Seventeen patients (47.2%) were free from abdominal pain and 13 patients (36.1%) reported significant amelioration of their pain. Six (16.6%) patients had no amelioration. Twenty-nine patients (80.6%) judged the outcome of the operation to be good or beneficial and 35 (97.2%) said that they would undergo the operation a second time if that were necessary. Laparoscopy is an effective tool for the evaluation of patients with chronic abdominal pain, and laparoscopic adhesiolysis cures or ameliorates chronic abdominal pain in more than 80% of patients.     

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis

The aim of this study was the detection of criteria that support the indication for laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients presenting with unspecific symptoms. A prospective analysis investigates the value of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain after exclusion of other pathologic findings; 58 consecutive patients were followed after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Endpoints of investigation were extent of adhesions, complications, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative quality of life. A comparison was drawn to patients following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus adhesiolysis, and conventional cholecystectomy.The results showed that major complications occurred in 10% of cases. In 45% of patients we found a complete remission, in 35% a substantial improvement, and in 20% a persistence of complaints. In a correlation between the preoperative complaints and the extent of adhesions we found small adhesions to cause recurrent abdominal pain without other symptoms while large adhesions produce recurrent abdominal pain in combination with symptoms indicative of intermittent bowel obstruction.Finally, the results of this study indicate a certain ideal constellation for an enduring successful adhesiolysis per laparoscopy: it is the subjective complaint of recurrent abdominal pain with a localized and reproducible punctum maximum in combination with a circumscribed area of adhesions at that site.     

Laparoskopie bei Dünndarmileus

Today laparoscopic procedures are routinely performed in patients with intestinal adhesions from previous abdominal surgery. Does laparoscopy have a potential benefit in acute small-bowel obstruction? Theoretically, a lower rate of wound complications and incisional hernias, as well as less subsequent adhesions with a lower incidence of recurrent intestinal obstruction, can be expected. However, laparoscopy is successful in only 50-70% of selected patients, thereby representing the highest rate of conversion in minimally invasive surgery. Laparoscopic management of severe abdominal distension with massively dilated and fragile small-bowel or dense adhesions is extremely difficult even when performed by experienced surgeons. Significantly prolonged operating time, the high risk of bowel injury (> 6-10%) and an increased frequency of early reoperations jeopardize the patient's safe outcome. However, in strictly selected patients the laparoscopic approach may be promising. In acute intestinal obstruction without a history of previous abdominal surgery, laparoscopy is--in the absence of adhesions--an excellent diagnostic tool and may also be a successful therapeutic modality in a variety of bowel-obstruction etiologies. Furthermore, the laparoscopic option should be considered in patients who previously had undergone small laparotomies (e.g., appendectomy) or laparoscopic surgery. We recommend "postlaparoscopic" intestinal obstruction as the ideal case for laparoscopic reexploration. Incarcerated hernias at the site of trocar insertion or adhesions due to peritoneal tears are easily identified as the cause of obstruction and successfully cured with the laparoscope. In conclusion, we advocate the laparoscopic approach in acute small-bowel obstruction exclusively for selected patients. Clinical studies are required to define appropriate surgical indications objectively.     

The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of patients with chronic abdominal pain or recurrent bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Major abdominal operations result in random and unpredictable scar tissue formation. Intraabdominal scar tissue may contribute to recurrent episodes of bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, or both. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis may provide relief of symptoms in patients with prior abdominal surgery with chronic abdominal pain or recurrent bowel obstruction. METHODS: Between September 1996 and April 1999, 35 patients underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Fifteen of the patients had adhesiolysis in conjunction with other major laparoscopic procedures and were excluded from the study. Twenty of the patients who underwent adhesiolysis only were retrospectively assessed for symptomatic relief as well as peri-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Two of 20 patients were not available for long-term follow-up. In the 18 remaining patients, laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed on 13 patients with abdominal pain and 5 patients with recurrent bowel obstruction. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 32 (mean 11) months. Sixteen of the 18 (88.9%) operations were completed laparoscopically. Two operations were converted to open for partial enterectomy. An additional enterotomy was repaired laparoscopically. All 3 operative complications were encountered in patients operated on during hospitalization for active bowel obstruction. No mortalities or blood transfusions occurred. One patient required rehospitalization for nonoperative management of an intraabdominal hematoma. Fourteen of the 18 (77.8%) had subjective improvement in their quality of life after operation. Only 1 patient has required repeat adhesiolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is a safe and effective management option for patients with prior abdominal surgery with chronic abdominal pain or recurrent bowel obstruction not attributed to other intraabdominal pathology. Laparoscopic intervention in patients with active bowel obstruction may increase the risk of operative complications.     

Reduction, regrowth, and de novo formation of abdominal adhesions after laparoscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective analysis

AIM: A significant reduction of abdominal adhesions at second-look relaparoscopy after adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. METHODS: 368 patients underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis because of chronic abdominal pain. Regrowth and de novo abdominal adhesions were determined in a qualitative and quantitative way in 24 patients who underwent a second-look re-laparoscopy because of recurrent pain after a mean period of 16 months after the first laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Reduction of incidence, extent, type, and severity of abdominal adhesions between organs and abdominal wall and de novo adhesion formation were determined. RESULTS: Incidence (40 vs. 26), extent, type, and severity of abdominal adhesions between organs and abdominal wall are significantly reduced after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. After adhesiolysis of adhesions between organs themselves, no significant reduction could be demonstrated (incidence 40 vs. 32). De novo adhesions were present in 5 (5/24) patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis results in a significant reduction of adhesions between organs and abdominal wall, despite the occurrence of de novo adhesions in about 20% of the patients.     

DIAGNOSTIC LAPAROSCOPY FOR CHRONIC RIGHT ILIAC FOSSA PAIN: A PILOT STUDY

Background : The aim of this study was to determine the value of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with chronic right iliac fossa pain. Methods : A retrospective study at Echuca Hospital involving case-note review and telephone questionnaire of patients who had undergone diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic right iliac fossa pain at least 12 months earlier (September 1992 to August 1995)was carried out. Results : Forty-one cases were identified and followed up 12-40 months postoperatively (median 21 months). Eleven cases had positive findings at laparoscopy, of whom eight obtained lasting relief after treatment. Of the remaining 30 patients 17 had a normal-looking appendix removed and 12 were cured; these were younger patients with episodic symptoms and localized signs. Of eight patients who had adhesions divided, four with adhesions beneath old scars obtained relief. Altogether 32 of the 41 patients considered the laparoscopy worthwhile even though in some cases it did not relieve their chronic pain. Conclusions : Diagnostic laparoscopy is worthwhile for patients with chronic right iliac fossa pain. Concurrent appendicectomy should be considered in young patients with episodic, well-localized symptoms associated with systemic malaise while adhesiolysis may be beneficial for viscero-parietal adhesions beneath abdominal wall scars.     

Laparoscopic management of recurrent adhesive small-bowel obstruction: Long-term follow-up

Purpose  To evaluate the efficiency, safety, and outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small-bowel obstruction (SBO), when performed early after failed conservative treatment. Methods  Between 1999 and 2005, elective laparoscopic adhesiolysis was attempted in 46 patients with recurrent SBO after abdominal or pelvic surgery. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was done during the acute onset of SBO after the patient failed to respond to 24 h of conservative treatment. Results  Fifteen patients (32.6%) presented with recurrent SBO and 31 patients (67.4%) presented with recurrent SBO and chronic abdominal pain. Postoperative adhesions were identified laparoscopically in all patients: as isolated bands in 11 patients, enteroperitoneal angulation in 12 patients, entero-enteral angulation in 17 patients, and extensive dense and matted intra-abdominal adhesions in 6 patients. Successful complete laparoscopic adhesiolysis was achieved in 42 of the 46 patients (91.3%). Conversion to minilaparotomy was required for a convoluted mass of adherent bowel in one patient (2.2%) and laparotomy was required for extensive dense and matted adhesions in three patients (6.5%). The mean follow-up was 46.5 months (range 24–89 months). Forty-three patients (93.5%) were asymptomatic after the operation. Only one patient (2.2%) had a further two episodes of SBO over 38 months of follow-up. Conclusion  Laparoscopic intervention, when done early after the onset of symptoms, is highly feasible, safe, and effective in selected patients with recurrent SBO caused by postoperative adhesion. Q. Wang, Z.Q. Hu, W.J. Wang, and J. Zhang contributed equally to this work.     

Does laparoscopy used in open exploration alleviate pain associated with chronic intractable abdominal wall neuralgia?

Background This study aimed to assess the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy and open exploration of trigger points (scar revision and neurectomy) in the treatment of intractable chronic abdominal wall pain. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study enrolled 24 patients (21 women) with an average age of 59 ± 11 years. Abdominal wall pain was diagnosed by excluding other causes of pain and using multiple injections of bupivacain. The patients’ demographic data and long-term postoperative course (37 ± 13 months) were carefully recorded. Results Using laparoscopy, intraabdominal adhesions close to trigger points were found and lysed in 15 patients (63%). Next, a subcutaneous nerve resection was performed. After 1 month, 33% of the patients were completely pain free, and 42% reported alleviation of pain. After 3 years, chronic abdominal pain was totally healed in 25%, diminished in 50%, and unchanged or increased in 25% of the patients. A total of 23 patients (96%) reported that surgery was beneficial for their intractable pain. Conclusions Laparoscopy used in open exploration is beneficial for 75% of carefully selected patients with chronic abdominal wall pain.     

Laparoscopic management of intestinal obstruction

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is a valuable tool for the surgeon performing complex minimally invasive procedures. It can be used for the management of intestinal obstruction and chronic abdominal pain syndromes. It is also an essential skill when performing laparoscopic surgery on patients who had prior abdominal operations. The use of laparoscopy for patients with an intestinal obstruction was once considered an absolute contraindication. With the advancement in optics and increasing experience, more and more surgeons are turning to laparoscopy as a useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool in more complex situations.     

Role of Elective Laparoscopic Appendicectomy for Chronic Right Lower Quadrant Pain

Chronic right lower quadrant pain is a common clinical entity and continues to remain a diagnostic and therapeutic problem. Laparoscopy is changing the view regarding exploration in patients with chronic right lower quadrant pain. Of recent, chronic or recurrent right lower quadrant pain is an entity that has generated much interest, hence this study has been undertaken. To study the role of elective laparoscopic appendicectomy for chronic or recurrent right lower quadrant pain. To study the relationship between clinical improvement and histopathological findings of removed appendix. Forty three cases of chronic right lower quadrant pain, who met the inclusion criteria, were included in the clinical study. Three cases were excluded during initial diagnostic laparoscopy because of ovarian cyst. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed in 40 cases. In our study amongst 40 (100 %) patients, 36(90 %) patients were relieved of pain completely. Only 4(10 %) patients continued to have persistent right lower quadrant pain. Duration of follow up was 6 months. Postoperative pain scores favour appendicectomy (p < 0.005). There was no association between postoperative pain scores and histopathology findings. There was no mortality in our study. Persistent or recurrent right lower quadrant pain can be treated successfully by elective laparoscopic appendicectomy in properly selected cases. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Histopathology of the removed appendix does not contribute to the diagnosis.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain after gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate, in an observational study, the utility of diagnostic laparoscopy as a tool to evaluate patients with abdominal pain of unknown etiology after gastric bypass surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of data from patients who had undergone laparoscopy for diagnosis or treatment of abdominal pain. This study included 13 patients with negative preoperative radiographic and/or endoscopic findings. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for abdominal pain. The findings included internal hernia (4), adhesions (3), ventral hernia (2), partial small bowel obstruction (1), and chronic cholecystitis (1). There were 2 negative laparoscopies, while a diagnosis was made in 85%. After an average follow-up of 3.2 months, 7 of 11 patients had unresolved abdominal pain and 4 patients experienced pain resolution (2 patients were lost to follow-up). CONCLUSION: The results from this small retrospective study suggest that significant pathologic findings can be identified in most patients who have negative preoperative evaluation findings; however, the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy to eliminate pain in this patient population requires additional study. Despite the potential complications, we believe that diagnostic laparoscopy has a role in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic abdominal pain after gastric bypass.     

Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies

Background Emergency laparoscopic exploration can be used to identify the causative pathology of acute abdominal pain. Laparoscopic surgery also allows treatment of many intraabdominal disorders. This report was prepared to describe the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared to laparotomy or nonoperative treatment. Methods A panel of European experts in abdominal and gynecological surgery was assembled and participated in a consensus conference using Delphi methods. The aim was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the most common diseases that may cause acute abdominal pain. Recommendations Laparoscopic surgery was found to be clearly superior for patients with a presumable diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer, acute cholecystitis, appendicitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease. In the emergency setting, laparoscopy is of unclear or limited value if adhesive bowel obstruction, acute diverticulitis, nonbiliary pancreatitis, hernia incarceration, or mesenteric ischemia are suspected. In stable patients with acute abdominal pain, noninvasive diagnostics should be fully exhausted before considering explorative surgery. However, diagnostic laparoscopy may be useful if no diagnosis can be found by conventional diagnostics. More clinical data are needed on the use of laparoscopy after blunt or penetrating trauma of the abdomen. Conclusions Due to diagnostic and therapeutic advantages, laparoscopic surgery is useful for the majority of conditions underlying acute abdominal pain, but noninvasive diagnostic aids should be exhausted first. Depending on symptom severity, laparoscopy should be advocated if routine diagnostic procedures have failed to yield results. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Venice, Italy, June 2005 S. Sauerland and E. A. M. Neugebauer are the Conference organizers on behalf of the Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), c/o EAES Office, P.O. Box 335, 5500 AH Veldhoven, The Netherlands     

Role of laparoscopy in identifying the clinical significance and cause of adhesions and chronic pelvic pain: a retrospective review at the Kiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the role of laparoscopy in identifying the clinical significance, cause, and association between adhesions and chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted from October 2004 to July 2005, at the Kiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. Included in the study was the analysis of 462 laparoscopic procedures; 275 (59.5%) of the patients undergoing these procedures had pelvic or abdominal adhesions. Of these, 84 (30.5%) patients were admitted with the main complaint of chronic pelvic pain. Further evaluation and assessment of this group was carried out. RESULTS: Among those patients with adhesions, the second most frequent reason for admission was chronic pelvic pain (30.5%) (P<0.0005). In our study, adhesions were found in 79.2% (n=84) of patients (n=106) with chronic pelvic pain. These adhesions were thin-filmy (19.0%) or thick-fibrous (81.0%) adhesions containing blood vessels. Thick-fibrous adhesions were present in 50.0% of patients at multiple abdominopelvic sites (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Thick-fibrous adhesions that extend beyond the pelvic sidewall can cause significant chronic abdominopelvic pain.     

Incidental laparoscopic appendectomy for acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain

Background: Removing the normal appendix when operating for suspected acute appendicitis is the standard of care. The use of laparoscopy should not alter this practice. Methods: Retrospective review of 72 patients found to have grossly normal appendices while undergoing laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Twenty-eight patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) alone while 44 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with incidental laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA). Results: There was no difference in length of hospitalization (DL = 44 h, ILA = 43 h, p= 0.49) or morbidity (DL = 11%, ILA = 5%, p= 0.37). One patient required appendectomy 11 days after diagnostic laparoscopy for recurrent acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Five percent of resected appendices (2/44) demonstrated acute inflammation upon pathologic review. Conclusions: Laparoscopic removal of the normal appendix produces no added morbidity or increase in length of hospitalization as compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. It demonstrates cost effectiveness by preventing missed and future appendicitis. Incidental laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred treatment option. Received 3 April 1997/Accepted: 3 July 1997