Epratuzumab, a humanized anti-CD22 antibody, in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: phase I/II clinical trial results.

PURPOSE: We conducted a single-center, dose-escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of epratuzumab, an anti-CD22 humanized monoclonal antibody, in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Epratuzumab was administered once weekly for 4 weeks at 120-1000-mg/m2 doses to 56 patients [most (n = 35) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]. RESULTS: Patients were heavily pretreated (median, 4 prior therapies), 25% received prior high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant, and 84% had bulky disease (> or =5 cm). Epratuzumab was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicity. Most (95%) infusions were completed within 1 h. The mean serum half-life was 23.9 days. Across all dose levels and histologies, objective responses (ORs) were observed in five patients (10%; 95% confidence interval, 3-21%), including three complete responses. In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 15% had ORs. Overall, 11 (20%) patients experienced some tumor mass reduction. Median duration of OR was 26.3 weeks, and median time to progression for responders was 35 weeks. Two responses are ongoing at > or =34 months, including one rituximab-refractory patient. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that epratuzumab has a good safety profile and exerts antitumor activity in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma at doses of > or =240 mg/m2, thus warranting further evaluation in this clinical setting.     

Dose-fractionated radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using DOTA-conjugated, 90Y-radiolabeled, humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, epratuzumab.

PURPOSE: Fractionated radioimmunotherapy may improve therapeutic outcome by decreasing heterogeneity of the dose delivered to the tumor and by decreasing hematologic toxicity, thereby allowing an increased amount of radionuclide to be administered. Because humanized anti-CD22 epratuzumab can be given repeatedly, a single-center study was conducted to establish the feasibility, safety, optimal dosing, and preliminary efficacy of weekly administrations of 90Y-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclodecane-N,N',N',N'-tetraacetic acid-conjugated epratuzumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cohorts of three to six patients with B-cell lymphoma received 185 MBq/m2 [90Y]epratuzumab with unconjugated epratuzumab (total protein dose 1.5 mg/kg) once weekly for two to four infusions, with [(111)In]epratuzumab coadministered at first infusion for scintigraphic imaging and dosimetry. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received treatment without significant infusional reactions. The overall objective response rate was 62% (95% confidence interval, 39-86%) in both indolent (75%) and aggressive disease (50%). Complete responses (CR/CRu) occurred in 25% of patients and were durable (event-free survival, 14-41 months). Two patients receiving four infusions had hematologic dose-limiting toxicity. Serum epratuzumab levels increased with each weekly dose. Of 13 patients with tumor cell CD22 expression determined by flow cytometry, seven of eight with strongly positive results had objective responses, versus one of five with negative or weakly positive results (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Radioimmunotherapy with weekly 185 MBq/m2 [90Y]epratuzumab achieved a high objective response rate (62%) across lymphoma subtypes, including durable CRs. The findings that three weekly infusions (555 MBq/m2, total dose) can be administered safely with only minor toxicity, that antibody levels increased during treatment weeks, and that therapeutic response predominantly occurs in patients with unequivocal CD22 tumor expression provide guidance for future studies.     

Characterization of a new humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, IMMU-106, and Its use in combination with the humanized anti-CD22 antibody, epratuzumab, for the therapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: A new humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb), IMMU-106, was evaluated to elucidate its action as an antilymphoma therapeutic, as a single agent, and in combination with the anti-CD22 MAb, epratuzumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Antiproliferative effects, apoptotic effects, and the ability of IMMU-106 to mediate complement-mediated cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity on a panel of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) cell lines were compared with the chimeric anti-CD20 MAb, rituximab, and evaluated in light of the various levels of antigen expression by the cell lines. In vivo therapy studies were performed in SCID mice bearing disseminated Raji lymphoma. RESULTS: The mechanisms of cytotoxicity of IMMU-106 were found to be similar to rituximab, and include direct apoptosis, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and complement-mediated cytotoxicity. IMMU-106 was also found to be very similar to rituximab in terms of antigen-binding specificity, binding avidity, and dissociation constant. Treatment of Raji-bearing SCID mice with IMMU-106 yielded median survival increases of up to 4.2-fold compared with control mice. Survival in mice treated with IMMU-106 plus epratuzumab was compared with IMMU-106 treatment alone. Although the combined treatment did not improve median survival, an increased proportion of long-term survivors was observed. An enhanced antiproliferative effect was also observed in vitro in SU-DHL-6 cells when IMMU-106 was combined with epratuzumab. These findings are consistent with the up-regulation of CD22 expression observed after pretreatment of NHL cells in vitro with CD20 MAb (IMMU-106). CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that in humans IMMU-106 should be at least as effective as rituximab and, due to its human framework construction, it may exhibit different pharmacokinetic, toxicity, and therapy profiles. In addition, it may be possible to enhance efficacy by combination therapy comprised of anti-CD20 and other B-cell lineage targeting MAbs, such as epratuzumab. The current results emphasize that in vitro as well as in vivo studies with many of the NHL cell lines were generally predictive of the known activity of anti-CD20 MAbs in NHL patients, as well as the enhanced efficacy of epratuzumab combined with rituximab observed in early clinical trials.     

Phase I/II trial of multiple dose 131Iodine-MAb LL2 (CD22) in patients with recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The purpose of this to evaluate in a phase I/II study the efficacy and toxicity of a multi-dose administration of 131I labeled CD22 monoclonal antibody (131I-MAb-LL2) in escalating dose cohorts administered to relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. Twenty-one patients with relapsed NHL received one of four dose levels of 131-MAb-LL2 administered in a twice weekly pattern. Starting with dose level 2, the patients also received 20 mg of unlabeled LL2 prior to each radiolabeled dose administered. Previously stored autologous peripheral blood progenitors were reinfused in case of prolonged cytopenias. Patients could repeat the same treatment if they had stable disease or a response to the first therapy at 8 weeks, and had not received their peripheral blood progenitors with the first cycle. Combining all of the dose cohorts, there were 5 complete responses or complete responses (undetermined) and 2 partial responses for a total response rate of 7/21 (33%). There was no dose response effect with responses documented at all dose levels. Expected toxicities were hematopoietic, requiring stem cell re-infusion in 5 patients. Other toxicities included hypothyroidism in 3 patients, and human anti-mouse antibody formation (HAMA) in 4 patients. In conclusion, 131I-MAb-LL2, when administered in a multi-dose fashion with 20 mg unlabeled antibody pre-dosing, resulted in a response rate of 33% in heavily pre-treated NHL patients. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild and few in number. Further evaluation of this treatment is warranted and further dose escalation will be possible.     

Phase II trial of temozolomide in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Temozolomide, an imidazotetrazine derivative, was given to 18 patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin''s lymphoma (NHL) at a dose of 750 mg m-2 orally, divided over five consecutive days, escalated to 1000 mg m-2 over 5 days (i.e. 200 mg m-2 day-1) if no significant myelosuppression was noted at day 22 of the 28 day cycle. Fifty-six treatment cycles were given to 18 patients. The drug was well tolerated. Only one partial tumour response was documented. The patients were heavily pretreated but had chemoresponsive disease, as shown by a response rate of 69% among 13 patients who went on to receive alternative cytotoxic regimens. We conclude that temozolomide given in this schedule is inactive in previously treated low-grade NHL.     

Phase II trial of peplomycin in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Seventeen patients with malignant lymphoma were entered into a phase II study of peplomycin (PEP) to determine the efficacy of the drug. There were 8 males and 9 females with a median age of 64 yrs (range 3-74 yrs) and a median PS 3 (range 2-4). Three of these were children. At first PEP was given intermittently and intramuscularly (8 cases) at a dose of 10 mg every one (3 cases) or two (5 cases) weeks, and then intravenously by 22-hr continuous infusion (9 cases) at a dose of 5 mg per day for 5 days. Mean cumulative dose was 78 mg. Objective responses were obtained in 6 patient (35%). CR lasting 4 weeks was obtained in one patient with diffuse mixed-type lymphoma. Five patients, one with diffuse medium-sized cell type and 3 with diffuse large cell type, had PR, lasting 6, 7, 7, 9, and 50+ weeks, respectively. Pulmonary fibrosis was found in two patients on autopsy and interstitial pneumonia in two patients clinically. Temporary high fever occurred in 7 patients, stomatitis in 3 patients and anorexia in 3 patients.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral fludarabine phosphate in relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of oral fludarabine phosphate in relapsed patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received fludarabine phosphate orally for 5 days, for a total of one to three cycles. Tolerability was assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Efficacy was assessed using the International Workshop Criteria for NHL. Pharmacokinetic samples were taken on day 1 and day 5 of the first treatment cycle. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. One patient at 40 mg/m2/day developed grade 4 hyperuricemia. At 50 mg/m2/day, one patient developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 4 leukopenia, and another patient showed lasting grade 4 neutropenia. Most common toxicities included grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia (83%), leukopenia (50%) and neutropenia (50%). All the toxicities were reversible. The overall response rate was 67%. The AUC0-24h values on day 5 indicated a dose-dependent increase in systemically available 2-fluoro-arabinofuranosyl-adenine (2F-ara-A). CONCLUSIONS: Oral fludarabine phosphate is safe and effective for relapsed patients with indolent B-NHL. The dose of 40 mg/m2/day is recommended for a following pivotal phase II study.     

Combination antibody therapy with epratuzumab and rituximab in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To explore the safety and therapeutic activity of combination anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody therapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma received anti-CD22 epratuzumab 360 mg/m(2) and anti-CD20 rituximab 375 mg/m(2) monoclonal antibodies weekly for four doses each. Sixteen patients had indolent histologies (15 with follicular lymphoma) and seven had aggressive NHL (all diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]). Indolent patients had received a median of one (range, one to six) prior treatment, with 31% refractory to their last therapy and 81% with high-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores. Patients with DLBCL had a median of three (range, one to eight) prior regimens (14% resistant to last treatment) and 71% had high intermediate-risk or high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. All patients were rituximab na?ve. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated, with toxicities principally infusion-related and predominantly grade 1 or 2. Ten (67%) patients with follicular NHL achieved an objective response (OR), including nine of 15 (60%) with complete responses (CRs and unconfirmed CRs). Four of six assessable patients (67%) with DLBCL achieved an OR, including three (50%) CRs. Median time to progression for all indolent NHL patients was 17.8 months. CONCLUSION: The full-dose combination of epratuzumab with rituximab was well tolerated and had significant clinical activity in NHL, suggesting that this combination should be tested in comparison with single-agent treatment.     

Phase I/II trial of filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF), CEOP chemotherapy and antiretroviral therapy in HIV-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND:: A phase I/II trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)of CEOP for AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with concurrentfilgrastim and antiretroviral therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Fourteen AIDS-NHL patients, chemotherapy-naïve and ECOGperformance status >2 received filgrastim 1.0 µg/kgs.c. daily for 3–7 days to assess neutrophil response,followed by CEOP with filgrastim support 10 µg/kg s.c.daily, day 2–14, continued if the absolute neutrophilcount (ANC) <1.2 x 10⁹/l. Two CEOP dose cohorts were used:cohort 1 (5 patients) - cyclophospharnide (C) 500 mg/m², epirubicin(E) 37.5 mg/m², vincristine (O) 2 mg and prednisolone (P) 75mg/m² daily on days 1–5; cohort 2 (9 patients) - C 750mg/m², E 50 mg/m², same doses of O and P. Antiretroviral therapywas maintained (zidovudine-10, ddI-3, both-1). RESULTS:: In cohort 1, 4/5 patients received at least 3 courses of CEOPwith one complete response after five cycles and four progressions.Four have died (3–21 months after entry) with 1 aliveat 40 months. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT - grade IV febrileneutropenia in cycle 1) occurred in 1 patient. In cohort 2,5/9 completed 5 cycles with 6 complete responses, 1 partialresponse and 2 progressions, 6 deaths and 3 alive at 33 months.DLT (evaluable in 8 patients) occurred in two patients. Mediansurvival for both cohorts was 17 months. Mean relative doseintensity was >85%. CONCLUSIONS:: The dosages of CEOP in cohort 1 defined the MTD however thecohort 2 doses with filgrastim and antiretroviral therapy gavean encouraging response, acceptable toxicities and merit furtherstudy. AIDS, antineoplastic agents, antiretroviral therapy, G-CSF, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma     

Phase I study of bryostatin 1 and fludarabine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent (non-Hodgkin's) lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies suggested that bryostatin 1 might potentiate the therapeutic effects of fludarabine in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We undertook a phase I study to identify appropriate schedules and doses of bryostatin 1 and fludarabine to be used in phase II studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or indolent lymphoma received fludarabine daily for 5 days and a single dose of bryostatin 1 via a 24-hour continuous infusion either before or after the fludarabine course. Doses were escalated in successive patients until recommended phase II doses for each sequence were identified on the basis of dose-limiting toxic events. RESULTS: Bryostatin 1 can be administered safely and tolerably with full dose fludarabine (25 mg/m(2)/d x 5). The recommended bryostatin 1 phase II dose is 50 microg/m(2) for both sequences, bryostatin 1 --> fludarabine and fludarabine --> bryostatin 1. The combination is active against both CLL and indolent lymphomas with responses seen in patients who had been previously treated with fludarabine. Correlative studies do not support the hypothesis that bryostatin 1 potentiates fludarabine activity through down-regulation of protein kinase C in target cells. CONCLUSIONS: Bryostatin 1 can be administered with full dose fludarabine, and the combination is moderately active in patients with persistent disease following prior treatment. In view of the activity of monoclonal antibodies such as the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in the treatment of CLL and indolent lymphomas, the concept of combining bryostatin 1 and fludarabine with rituximab warrants future consideration.     

Phase I trial of fludarabine and paclitaxel in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Fludarabine is an active agent in low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Paclitaxel is also active in patients with refractory lymphoma, and preclinical data suggest an additive effect with fludarabine in vitro. We performed a phase I trial of fludarabine (25 mg/m² d 1–3) plus a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel (125, 150, or 175 mg/m²) on d 3 every 28 d in 13 patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The paclitaxel dose was escalated in cohorts of 3–4 patients using standard phase I design schema. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as febrile neutropenia, platelet nadir less than 50,000/μL, or grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicity. Thirteen patients were accrued to the study, 8 of these 13 patients (62%) had received prior chemotherapy. At the 125-, 150-, and 175-mg/m² dose levels of paclitaxel, dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1/4, 0/4, and 0/4 patients, respectively. The single patient with dose-limiting toxicity had febrile neutropenia. Partial response occurred in two of eight patients with low-grade lymphoma and none of five patients with other types of lymphoma. A paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m² given as a 3-h infusion on d 3 in conjunction with fludarabine (25 mg/m² d 1–3 every 4 wk) is a well-tolerated regimen for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Further study will be required in order to determine whether the fludarabine-paclitaxel is more active than fludarabine alone in patients with low-grade lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.     

Phase I/II study of galiximab, an anti-CD80 antibody, for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, dose-escalation study evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of galiximab (anti-CD80 monoclonal antibody) in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had follicular lymphoma that had relapsed or failed to respond to primary therapy; the majority (90%) presented with stage III or IV disease. Four weekly intravenous infusions of galiximab were administered at doses of 125, 250, 375, or 500 mg/m2. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received galiximab treatment and were evaluated for safety; 35 were assessable for response. Antibody infusions were safe and well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. A total of 22 (60%) of 37 patients experienced adverse events related to galiximab. All but one of the events were grade 1 or 2; the most common were fatigue, nausea, and headache. Cytopenias were rare; only one patient experienced anemia and febrile neutropenia, which were unrelated to galiximab and resolved after treatment. No patient developed antigaliximab antibody formation. The mean serum half-life ranged from 13 to 24 days. The overall response rate was 11% (two complete responses and two partial responses). Time to best response was delayed (months 3, 6, 9, and 12). Twelve patients (34%) maintained stable disease. Nearly half of all patients (49%) had a decrease in indicator lesions. Two responders remain on study without progression (22 and 24.4 months). CONCLUSION: The favorable safety profile of galiximab and evidence of single-agent biologic activity and dose-dependent pharmacokinetics support further evaluation of galiximab as a treatment for follicular lymphoma, possibly in combination with other lymphoma therapies.     

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of epratuzumab (anti-CD22 IgG) in B-cell malignancies

The vast majority of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas are of B-cell phenotype. Development of unlabeled or radiolabeled therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against the cell surface antigen, CD20, has revolutionized the treatment of these malignancies. It is clear that antibodies targeting other B-cell-specific molecules, such as CD22, also offer potential therapeutic benefit. Epratuzumab is a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal, which has undergone preclinical and phase I/II clinical evaluation in patients with indolent or aggressive lymphoma. Data suggest that this agent is well tolerated, and can induce tumor regressions. Trials are currently evaluating its safety and activity in combination with rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20) and standard chemotherapy are ongoing. Initial results suggest that these regimens have acceptable toxicity, and that epratuzumab warrants further evaluation as an adjunct to standard lymphoma treatment regimens.     

Treatment of refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with radiolabeled MB-1 (anti-CD37) antibody

The biodistribution, toxicity, and therapeutic potential of anti-CD37 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) MB-1 labeled with iodine 131 (131I) was evaluated in ten patients with advanced-, low- or intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas who failed conventional treatment. Sequential dosimetric studies were performed with escalating amounts of antibody MB-1 (0.5, 2.5, 10 mg/kg) trace-labeled with 5 to 10 mCi 131I. Serial tumor biopsies and gamma camera imaging showed that the 10 mg/kg MoAb dose yielded the best MoAb biodistribution in the ten patients studied. Biodistribution studies in the five patients with splenomegaly and tumor burdens greater than 1 kg indicated that not all tumor sites would receive more radiation than normal organs, and these patients were therefore not treated with high-dose radioimmunotherapy. The other five patients did not have splenomegaly and had tumor burdens less than 0.5 kg; all five patients in this group showed preferential localization and retention of MoAb at tumor sites. Four of these patients have been treated with 131I (232 to 608 mCi) conjugated to anti-CD37 MoAb MB-1, delivering 850 to 4,260 Gy to tumor sites. Each of these four patients attained a complete tumor remission (lasting 4, 6, 11+, and 8+ months). A fifth patient, whose tumor did not express the CD37 antigen, was treated with 131I-labeled anti-CD20 MoAb 1F5 and achieved a partial response. Myelosuppression occurred 3 to 5 weeks after treatment in all cases, but there were no other significant acute toxicities. Normal B cells were transiently depleted from the bloodstream, but immunoglobulin (Ig) levels were not affected, and no serious infections occurred. Two patients required reinfusion of previously stored autologous, purged bone marrow. Two patients developed asymptomatic hypothyroidism 1 year after therapy. The tolerable toxicity and encouraging efficacy warrant further dose escalation in this phase I trial.     

Phase I study of the anti-CD40 humanized monoclonal antibody lucatumumab (HCD122) in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract Lucatumumab is a fully humanized anti-CD40 antibody that blocks interaction of CD40L with CD40 and also mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). We evaluated lucatumumab in a phase I clinical trial in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Twenty-six patients with relapsed CLL were enrolled on five different dose cohorts administered weekly for 4 weeks. The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of lucatumumab was 3.0 mg/kg. Four patients at doses of 4.5 mg/kg and 6.0 mg/kg experienced grade 3 or 4 asymptomatic elevated amylase and lipase levels. Of the 26 patients enrolled, 17 patients had stable disease (mean duration of 76 days, range 29-504 days) and one patient had a nodular partial response for 230 days. Saturation of CD40 receptor on CLL cells was uniform at all doses post-treatment but also persisted at trough time points in the 3.0 mg/kg or greater cohorts. At the MTD, the median half-life of lucatumumab was 50 h following the first infusion, and 124 h following the fourth infusion. In summary, lucatumumab had acceptable tolerability, pharmacokinetics that supported chronic dosing and pharmacodynamic target antagonism at doses of 3.0 mg/kg, but demonstrated minimal single-agent activity. Future efforts with lucatumumab in CLL should focus on combination-based therapy.     

A phase I trial of humanized monoclonal antibody HuM195 (anti-CD33) with low-dose interleukin 2 in acute myelogenous leukemia.

HuM195 is a recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody reactive with CD33, a Mr 67,000 glycoprotein expressed on early myeloid progenitor cells and myeloid leukemia cells. HuM195 has been shown to rapidly target and saturate acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells after i.v. infusion into patients and is capable of mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This activity is enhanced in vitro when natural killer (NK) effector cells are preincubated with low concentrations of interleukin 2 (IL-2). Previous Phase I trials of HuM195 in patients with relapsed AML demonstrated safety and attainment of complete responses, but significant antileukemic activity appears limited to patients with low leukemia tumor burdens. Therefore, in the present trial, we sought to determine whether low-dose IL-2 could safely enhance the numbers of NK cells and therefore the cytotoxic capability of HuM195 via presumptive NK cell antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vivo against myeloid leukemia cells. Thirteen patients with relapsed or refractory AML and one patient with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome were treated with 0.6x10(6) IU/m2 of s.c. IL-2 daily for 35 days. Starting on day 15, patients received twice weekly i.v. infusions of HuM195 (3.0 mg/m2) for 3 weeks. Immediately after the HuM195 infusion, the patients received IL-2 i.v. infusions over 2 h at one of three escalating dose levels of 0.5x10(6), 1.0x10(6), and 2.0x10(6) IU/m2. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were quantitated and immunophenotyped by flow cytometry. Safety, tolerability, bone marrow mononuclear cell morphology, and immunophenotype, as well as responses were assessed. Of the 14 patients who entered the study, 10 were able to complete at least one cycle of therapy. Adverse effects to the s.c. IL-2 were relatively mild and included erythema and induration of the skin at the injection site and low-grade fever. Toxicity from the sequential HuM195 and i.v. IL-2 infusions included nausea, rigors, and fever. Toxicity was IL-2 dose related with dose-limiting toxicity seen at the 2.0x10(6) IU/m2 dose level. Three patients had stable disease at the completion of the first cycle and went on to receive a second cycle of treatment. CD3-positive, CD56-positive, and CD33-positive cells were generally found to significantly decrease immediately after each administration of i.v. IL-2 and HuM195. CD56-expressing cells increased in 6 of 10 patients from the beginning to the end of therapy. Among the 10 evaluable patients, 2 patients had significant decreases in the percentage of blasts in the bone marrow (one of which achieved a complete bone marrow remission), 5 patients had stable levels of bone marrow blasts, and 3 had progression of disease on therapy. The combination of IL-2 and HuM195 shows modest biological activity and clinical antileukemic activity but also produced significant toxicity.     

Phase I/II study of 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine with cyclophosphamide in patients with pretreated B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Because of their substantial in vitro synergy, we conducted a dose-escalation study of cyclophosphamide (CP) added to 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (CdA) in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CdA was given at a fixed dose (5.6 mg/m2/day) as a 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, immediately followed by a 1-h i.v. infusion of CP, for 3 days. The initial daily CP dose was 200 mg/m2, and was escalated by 100 mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three to six patients to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Additional patients were included at the MTD to extend toxicity and response analysis. Twenty-six patients received 68 cycles of chemotherapy. The MTD of CP after CdA 5.6 mg/m2, was 300 mg/m2. Acute neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen, which was otherwise well tolerated. Delivery of repeated cycles was not feasible in eight patients (31%) because of prolonged thrombocytopenia. Severe infections were seen in three of 68 cycles (4%). The overall response rate was 58% (15 of 26; 95% CI, 36-76%), with 15% complete responses and 42% partial responses. These data show the feasibility of the association of CdA with CP. Given the response rate observed, further studies of this regimen are warranted in untreated patients, in particular with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and with Waldenstr?m macroglobulinemia.