Budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler improves asthma control compared with increasing the dose of corticosteroid in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose budesonide/formoterol, 80 micro g/4.5 micro g, bid in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler; AstraZeneca; Lund, Sweden) compared with an increased dose of budesonide, 200 micro g bid, in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not fully controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroid alone. METHODS: All patients received budesonide, 100 micro g bid, during a 2-week run-in period. At the end of the run-in phase, 467 patients with a mean FEV(1) of 82% predicted received 12 weeks of treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler or budesonide alone in a higher dose. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), nighttime and daytime symptom scores, and use of reliever medication. RESULTS: The increase in mean morning PEF-the primary efficacy measure-was significantly higher for budesonide/formoterol compared with budesonide alone (16.5 L/min vs 7.3 L/min, p = 0.002). Similarly, evening PEF was significantly greater in the budesonide/formoterol group (p < 0.001). In addition, the percentage of symptom-free days and asthma-control days (p = 0.007 and p = 0.002, respectively) were significantly improved in the budesonide/formoterol group. Budesonide/formoterol decreased the relative risk of an asthma exacerbation by 26% (p = 0.02) compared with budesonide alone. Adverse events were comparable between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in adult patients whose mild-to-moderate asthma is not fully controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroids, single-inhaler therapy with budesonide and formoterol provides greater improvements in asthma control than increasing the maintenance dose of inhaled corticosteroid.     

Maximal airway response to methacholine in cough-variant asthma: comparison with classic asthma and its relationship to peak expiratory flow variability

BACKGROUND: In asthmatic subjects, not only airway sensitivity but maximal airway response are increased on the dose-response curve to methacholine, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability is closely related to airway hypersensitivity and maximal airway response. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare the prevalence and the level of maximal response plateau between patients with cough-variant asthma (CVA) and those with classic asthma (CA), and to examine the relationship between airway hypersensitivity or maximal airway response and PEF variability in patients with CVA. METHODS: A high-dose methacholine inhalation test was performed on 83 patients with CVA and on 83 patients with CA matched for provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). PEF was recorded in the morning and evening for 14 consecutive days in 78 CVA patients, and the amplitude percentage mean was used to express the diurnal PEF variation. RESULTS: Fifty-two CVA subjects (62.7%) but only 33 CA subjects (39.8%) showed a maximal response plateau. This difference was significant after correction by the Bonferroni method (corrected p = 0.024). Subjects in the CVA and CA groups showing a plateau had significantly different plateau levels (38.0 +/- 5.9% vs 42.9 +/- 3.9%, corrected p = 1.0 x 10(-4)). In patients with CVA, no significant relationship was found between PC20 and PEF variability. However, the absence of a maximal response plateau and a higher plateau level were associated with increased PEF variability. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal airway response may be an important confounder in the relationship between airway hypersensitivity and the clinical expression of asthma. The identification of a maximal response plateau and the level of this plateau in patients with CVA provide information relevant to PEF variability.     

Improved asthma control with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler, compared with budesonide alone.

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler was compared with budesonide alone, and with concurrent administration of budesonide and formoterol from separate inhalers, in patients with asthma, not controlled with inhaled glucocorticosteroids alone. In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized, double-dummy study, 362 adult asthmatics (forced expiratory volume in one second 73.8% of predicted, inhaled glucocorticosteroid dose 960 microg x day(-1)) received single inhaler budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler) 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations b.i.d., or corresponding treatment with budesonide, or budesonide plus formoterol via separate inhalers. There was a greater increase in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) with single-inhaler (35.7 L x min(-1)) and separate-inhaler (32.0 L x min(-1)) budesonide and formoterol, compared with budesonide alone (0.2 L x min(-1); p<0.001, both comparisons); the effect was apparent after 1 day (p<0.001 versus budesonide, both comparisons). Similarly, evening PEF, use of rescue medication, total asthma symptom scores and percentage of symptom-free days improved more with both single inhaler and separate inhaler therapy than with budesonide alone, as did asthma control days (approximately 15% more, p<0.001 versus budesonide, both comparisons, with a marked increase in the first week). All treatments were well tolerated and the adverse event profile was similar in all three treatment groups. It is concluded that single inhaler therapy with budesonide and formoterol is a clinically effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with asthma that is not fully controlled by inhaled glucocorticosteroids alone.     

Comparison of high and low dose of the inhaled steroid, budesonide, as an initial treatment in newly detected asthma

The importance of early initiation of inhaled steroids even in mild asthma has been documented in several studies. It is not, however, clear whether the treatment should be started with a high or a low dose of the inhaled steroid. We have compared the effects of high and low dose inhaled steroid, budesonide, in patients with newly detected asthma. We studied 101 adult patients with newly detected bronchial asthma who were without inhaled steroid or any regular pharmacological treatment for their asthma. The patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: one to receive 800 microg inhaled budesonide per day and the other to receive 200 microg inhaled budesonide per day. The drugs were given with a Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler. During the 3-month treatment period, no significant differences between the treatment groups were noted in morning or evening PEF values, in spirometric parameters, in asthmatic symptoms or in the use of rescue beta2-agonists. The decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness was, however, more marked in the high dose budesonide group, reaching a borderline significance (P=0.10 high vs. low dose budesonide). In addition, in serum markers of asthmatic inflammation significant differences were shown between the treatment groups. The decrease in the number of blood eosinophils during the treatment was more marked in the high dose budesonide group (P=0.02; high vs. low dose budesonide). In serum ECP no change was observed in the low dose budesonide group, but a marked decrease in the high-dose budesonide group (P=0.008; high vs. low dose budesonide). The change was even more marked with regard to serum EPX (P=0.005; high vs. low dose budesonide). Our results support the view that the treatment of newly detected asthma should be started with a high dose of inhaled steroid. The low dose may not be enough to suppress asthmatic inflammation despite good clinical primary response.     

Comparison of oral bambuterol and inhaled salmeterol in patients with symptomatic asthma and using inhaled corticosteroids

Salmeterol inhaled twice-daily is now being used more frequently as additional treatment in asthma insufficiently controlled by inhaled corticosteroids. We compared oral bambuterol in a dose of 20 mg taken once daily in the evening with inhaled salmeterol at 50 microgram taken twice daily in 126 asthmatic patients (60 bambuterol, 66 salmeterol) aged 18 to 74 yr who were treated for at least 4 wk with inhaled corticosteroids at a constant dose of 400 to 2,000 microgram/d or with oral corticosteroids at /= 15% overnight decrease in peak expiratory flow (PEF) on 3 of the preceding 7 d, in order to be randomized into this double-blind, double dummy, multicenter parallel group study (2-wk run-in period and 6 wk of treatment). There was no significant difference between bambuterol and salmeterol in morning change from baseline in PEF (p = 0.53). The median increases in morning PEF were 50 L/min for bambuterol and 55 L/min for salmeterol. Other variables (evening PEF, percent of overnight decrease in PEF, number of awakenings, percent of nights with an awakening, number of puffs of rescue medication, asthma symptoms during the day and night, and mean tremor score) also showed no significant difference between bambuterol and salmeterol. Both treatments, at the doses given, were well tolerated. Once-daily oral bambuterol is a convenient, effective, and less expensive alternative to twice-daily inhaled salmeterol for treating nocturnal asthma.     

Efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily administration of budesonide by Turbuhaler(R) in children with stable asthma.

We evaluated the efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with budesonide, delivered by a Turbuhaler(R), in the management of children with stable asthma in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study involving 206 children (age 5-15 years). After a 2-week run-in period during which the children were maintained on their usual dose of budesonide (200 microg or 400 microg/day), patients were randomized to receive the same daily dose in either two daily administrations (morning and evening) or as a single dose in the morning over a period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). The mean morning PEF during the run-in phase was 271 L/min in patients randomized to once-daily treatment and 264 L/min in those randomized to twice-daily treatment. The mean change from baseline to the last 2 weeks of the treatment period in the two groups was -0.3 L/min (95% confidence limits -6.6 to +6.0) and 2.5 L/min (-4.3 to +9.3). The estimated difference between the groups was -2.8 L/min, with 90% confidence limits of -10.4 + 4.5; these were close to the limits regarded as indicative of equivalence (-10 to +10), and hence the difference was not regarded as clinically relevant. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in regard to secondary efficacy measures such as spirometric tests and symptom scores. Both treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that once-daily administration of budesonide by Turbuhaler(R) is as effective as twice-daily treatment in the management of stable asthma in children treated with inhaled steroids at doses of 200-400 microg/day.     

Efficacy and safety of high-dose budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) compared with budesonide administered either concomitantly with formoterol or alone in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: Budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations bd, is an effective and well-tolerated maintenance therapy for patients not controlled on inhaled corticosteroids alone. The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of a higher dose of budesonide/formoterol in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma. METHODS: This was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy randomized study. Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg, two inhalations bd (1280/36 microg/day), was compared with corresponding doses of budesonide during weeks 1-12 and budesonide plus formoterol via separate inhalers during weeks 1-24. Efficacy was assessed during weeks 1-12; the primary variable was morning PEF. Safety was assessed over weeks 1-24. RESULTS: Patients (n=456; aged 12-79 years) had a mean reversibility in FEV1 of 28% and mean pre-study inhaled corticosteroid dose of 1038 microg/day. Mean morning PEF increased by 37 L/min and 36 L/min with budesonide/formoterol and budesonide plus formoterol, respectively, versus an increase of 5 L/min with budesonide (P<0.001 for both vs. budesonide). Budesonide/formoterol increased time to first mild exacerbation (P<0.005) versus budesonide. Budesonide/formoterol and budesonide plus formoterol had similar efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated and the incidence of class-related adverse events was similarly low in all groups. Changes in serum potassium and plasma cortisol were comparable across treatments. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg, two inhalations bd) is effective and well tolerated in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma. The findings also support the safety of regular high-dose formoterol (36 microg/day).     

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone in the treatment of asthma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy (expressed as effect on lung function) and tolerability of Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) in children with asthma. This was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial. After a 2-4-week run-in period, 286 asthmatic children (177 boys, 109 girls; mean age, 11 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), 75% predicted normal), previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (average dose 548 microg/day), were randomized to 12 weeks' treatment with either budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily (n = 148), or an equivalent dose of budesonide 100 microg, two inhalations twice daily (n = 138). Efficacy variables included morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), spirometery, asthma symptoms, and use of rescue medication (beta(2)-agonists). Serial FEV(1) assessments were carried out on a subgroup of children (budesonide/formoterol, n = 41; budesonide, n = 40) at randomization and at week 12. Relative to baseline, morning PEF (primary variable) increased to a significantly greater extent with budesonide/formoterol than with budesonide alone (7.22% predicted normal vs 3.45% predicted normal; P < 0.001). Evening PEF also increased significantly with budesonide/formoterol (6.13% predicted normal vs. 2.73% predicted normal; P < 0.001), as did mean FEV(1) and serial FEV(1) measured over 12 hr (both P < 0.05). Similar improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use were observed in both groups. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of their adverse-event profile and rates of discontinuation. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler provided rapid improvements in PEF and FEV(1) compared to inhaled budesonide alone. These improvements were sustained throughout the study period. Budesonide/formoterol was well-tolerated in children with moderate persistent asthma.     

Inflammatory and functional effects of increasing asthma treatment with formoterol or double dose budesonide

Adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthma treatment is better than increasing ICS dose in improving clinical status, although there is no consensus about the impact of this regimen on inflammation. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, asthmatics with moderate to severe disease used budesonide (400 mcg/day) for 5 weeks (run-in period); then they were randomized to use budesonide (800 mcg/day - BUD group) or budesonide plus formoterol (400 mcg and 24 mcg/day, respectively - FORMO group) for 9 weeks (treatment period). Home PEF measurements, symptom daily reporting, spirometry, sputum induction (for differential cell counts and sputum cell cultures), and hypertonic saline bronchial challenge test were performed before and after treatments. TNF-alpha, IL-4 and eotaxin-2 levels in the sputum and cell culture supernatants were determined. Morning and night PEF values increased in the FORMO group during the treatment period (p<0.01), from 435+/-162 to 489+/-169 and 428+/-160 to 496+/-173 L/min, respectively. The rate of exacerbations in the FORMO group was lower than in the BUD group (p<0.05). Neutrophil counts in sputum increased in both groups (p<0.05) and leukocyte viability after 48h-culture increased in the FORMO group (p<0.05). No other parameter changed significantly in either group. This study showed that adding formoterol to budesonide improved home PEF and provided protection from exacerbations, although increase of leukocyte viability in cell culture may be a matter of concern and needs further investigation.     

Ciclesonide is more effective than budesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide is a lung-activated inhaled corticosteroid that provides effective control of persistent asthma. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide versus once-daily budesonide in patients with asthma. METHODS: A total of 399 patients with asthma were randomised to receive once-daily ciclesonide 320 microg ex-actuator (equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) or once-daily budesonide 400 microg for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)). Additional efficacy variables included forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication and time to onset of effect. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Both ciclesonide and budesonide significantly increased FEV(1) from baseline (416 and 321 ml, respectively; p<0.0001). The increase in FEV(1) was significantly greater in ciclesonide-treated patients (95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.174; p=0.019 versus budesonide). Similarly, ciclesonide and budesonide significantly improved FVC and PEF from baseline (p<0.0001), and significantly greater increases occurred with ciclesonide (p=0.034 and 0.019 versus budesonide, respectively). Analysis of morning PEF revealed an earlier onset of action for ciclesonide versus budesonide; a significant improvement was seen by day 2 (p=0.039 versus baseline) with ciclesonide compared with day 7 for budesonide (p=0.047 versus baseline). Adverse events occurred with a similar incidence in both treatment groups. Neither treatment caused significant changes in urinary cortisol levels. CONCLUSION: Once-daily ciclesonide was more effective than once-daily budesonide in improving FEV(1), FVC and PEF. Ciclesonide also had an earlier onset of action than budesonide in patients with persistent asthma. Both ciclesonide and budesonide had good safety and tolerability profiles.     

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for maintenance and relief in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare a novel asthma management strategy--budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for both maintenance therapy and symptom relief--with a higher dose of budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline. METHODS: This was a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (n = 697; mean age, 38 years [range, 11 to 79 years]; mean baseline FEV1, 75% of predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] dosage, 348 microg/d). Following a 2-week run-in period, all patients received two blinded, dry powder inhalers, one containing maintenance medication and one containing medication to be used as needed for the relief of symptoms. Patients were randomized to receive either budesonide/formoterol (80 microg/4.5 microg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance plus additional inhalations as needed for symptom relief, or budesonide (160 microg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance medication plus terbutaline (0.4 mg) as needed. The primary efficacy variable was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). RESULTS: Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol showed greater improvements in morning PEF than patients receiving budesonide (increases of 34.5 L/min vs 9.5 L/min, respectively; p < 0.001). The risk of having a severe exacerbation (hospitalization/emergency department [ED] treatment, oral steroids for asthma, or a > or = 30% decrease from baseline in morning PEF on 2 consecutive days) was 54% lower with budesonide/formoterol vs budesonide (p = 0.0011). Budesonide/formoterol patients experienced 90% fewer hospitalizations/ED treatments due to asthma than budesonide patients (1 vs 10, respectively; p = 0.026). The increased efficacy with budesonide/formoterol was achieved with less ICS than was used in the budesonide group (mean dose, 240 microg/d vs 320 microg/d, respectively) and with 77% fewer oral steroid treatment days vs budesonide (114 days vs 498 days, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and relief improves asthma control with a lower steroid load compared with a higher dose of budesonide plus terbutaline.     

Once-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol and once-daily budesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma

Adherence to maintenance therapy is often poor in patients with asthma. Simplifying dosing regimens has the potential to improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 617 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 78.5% predicted) who were not optimally controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg/day) were randomized to once-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations in the evening), twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 1 inhalation), or a corresponding dose of budesonide once-daily (200 microg, 1 inhalation in the evening). All patients received budesonide (100 microg twice daily) during a 2-week run-in. Changes in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were similar for od budesonide/formoterol (23.4 l/min) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (24.1 l/min), and both were greater than with budesonide (5.5 l/min; both P<0.001). Evening PEF, symptom-free days, reliever-free days, and asthma control days were improved with budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P<0.05 vs. budesonide for all variables). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol administered once daily in the evening is a convenient treatment regimen that is as effective in improving asthma control as twice-daily dosing in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.     

Action of budesonide on asthmatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Effects on directly and indirectly acting bronchoconstrictors

We have investigated the effects of inhaled budesonide on the bronchial responsiveness to both directly and indirectly acting spasmogens in man. Following treatment with budesonide or placebo for three weeks in a double-blind, crossover trial with a three-week washout, the response to histamine and bradykinin was determined in ten patients with mild asthma. After treatment with budesonide, the response to both inhaled histamine and bradykinin was decreased when compared with placebo. The PD35 histamine was increased by 1.95 doubling doses and PD35 bradykinin by 2.1 doubling doses. Daily (PEF) recordings were significantly increased during budesonide therapy, the morning PEF by 34.8 +/- 14.1 L/min and evening by 50.3 +/- 23.1 L/min. Baseline laboratory lung function on the study days was not altered by budesonide nor were symptom records altered significantly. Inhaled budesonide therefore inhibits to the same extent the exaggerated response to both directly acting histamine and bradykinin which acts through airway nerves.     

Comparison of the effects of prolonged treatment with low and high doses of inhaled terbutaline on beta-adrenoceptor responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Eleven patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (age, 61 +/- 2 yr; FEV1, 1.36 +/- 0.24 L, 46 +/- 7% predicted) were given 4 wk of treatment with either a conventional low dose of inhaled terbutaline (LDT), 500 micrograms four times a day, or a high dose of inhaled terbutaline (HDT), 2,000 micrograms four times a day, delivered by a spacer. A randomized double-blind crossover design was used with 2-wk run-in and washout periods, when ipratropium bromide was substituted for inhaled beta-agonists. Dose response curves (DRC) to cumulative doubling doses of inhaled terbutaline (125 to 4,000 micrograms) were constructed after each treatment period, and baseline spirometry, finger tremor (Tr), plasma potassium (K), plasma cAMP, and ECG (HR and T wave) were measured at each dose step of the DRC. Daily PEFR measurements (A.M. and P.M.) and Holter ECG were performed during run-in and treatment periods. Baseline values for FEV1 were not significantly different during run-in, treatment, or washout periods. There were dose-related increases in FEV1 (p less than 0.0001) with no significant differences between DRC after treatment with HDT compared with those with LDT: delta FEV1 max, 0.46 +/- 0.14 L, 15.5 +/- 3.7% predicted (HDT); 0.50 +/- 0.11 L, 16.0 +/- 3.1% predicted (LDT). There were also no differences between DRC for delta FVC: 1.08 +/- 0.22 L, 31.1 +/- 5.4% predicted (HDT); 0.99 +/- 0.14 L, 28.5 +/- 3.8% predicted (LDT). There were no significant changes in K or HR in response to cumulative doses of terbutaline after either treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Changes in sputum eosinophils predict loss of asthma control

Exacerbations of asthma are likely to be due to an increase in airway inflammation. We have studied noninvasive markers of airway inflammation in asthma exacerbations induced by reducing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Following a 2-wk run-in period, mild exacerbations were induced in subjects with stable asthma controlled with medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone dipropionate >/= 800 microg or equivalent daily) by switching them to budesonide 200 microg daily given from a dry-powder inhaler (Turbohaler). Fifteen subjects were enrolled and were seen twice weekly for 8 wk after steroid reduction. At each visit, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and methacholine airway responsiveness were measured and spirometry and sputum induction were performed. Mild exacerbation was defined as: (1) a decrease in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) of >/= 20% but < 30% on at least two consecutive days as compared with the mean for the last 7 d of the run-in period; (2) awakening on two consecutive nights because of asthma; or (3) increased use of a short-acting beta(2)-agonist to eight or more puffs daily. Eight subjects did not develop exacerbations during the 8-wk study, whereas seven subjects developed mild exacerbations at Week 4 (n = 1), Week 6 (n = 1), and Week 8 (n = 5). The only significant difference between these two groups at baseline was a higher baseline sputum eosinophil count in subjects with subsequent exacerbations (p < 0.05). The increases in sputum eosinophils and exhaled NO were correlated with decreases in airway function, including decreases in morning PEF and FEV(1). However, multiple regression analysis suggested that the change in sputum eosinophils is a potentially useful marker in predicting loss of asthma control reflected by loss of airway function.     

Efficacy and Tolerability of Budesonide Clickhaler® and Turbuhaler® in Adult Asthma

New dry powder inhalers should be clinically comparable with established devices to ensure the continuity of effective therapy for asthma patients. This randomized, open, parallel group study compared the clinical efficacy and tolerability of budesonide delivered via Clickhaler® or Turbuhaler® dry powder inhalers in adults with mild to moderate stable asthma. Following a 4-week stabilizing period using budesonide Turbuhaler adults aged 18 years or older, who had been treated with inhaled corticosteroids for at least the previous 12 weeks, were randomized to receive budesonide twice daily (≤ 1600 µg/day) via either Clickhaler (n = 110) or Turbuhaler (n = 112) for 12 weeks. Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF, asthma symptoms, and use of inhaled short-acting β₂-agonist were recorded daily by the patients on diary cards. Lung function and tolerability data were recorded at clinic visits following 4, 8, and 12 weeks' treatment. Efficacy was measured primarily by mean change from the run-in baseline in weekly morning PEF. Of the 222 patients randomized to treatment, 167 completed the study according to the protocol. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance indicated that the devices were clinically equivalent; a treatment difference of ? 2.3 L/min separated the group mean changes in weekly morning PEF (95% confidence interval ? 7.9 to 3.3). Secondary analyses also supported clinical comparability. This study demonstrates the comparable clinical efficacy and tolerability of budesonide Clickhaler and Turbuhaler devices in adult patients with stable asthma.     

Efficacy and Tolerability of Budesonide Clickhaler® and Turbuhaler® in Adult Asthma

New dry powder inhalers should be clinically comparable with established devices to ensure the continuity of effective therapy for asthma patients. This randomized, open, parallel group study compared the clinical efficacy and tolerability of budesonide delivered via Clickhaler® or Turbuhaler® dry powder inhalers in adults with mild to moderate stable asthma. Following a 4-week stabilizing period using budesonide Turbuhaler adults aged 18 years or older, who had been treated with inhaled corticosteroids for at least the previous 12 weeks, were randomized to receive budesonide twice daily (≤ 1600 µg/day) via either Clickhaler (n = 110) or Turbuhaler (n = 112) for 12 weeks. Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF, asthma symptoms, and use of inhaled short-acting β₂-agonist were recorded daily by the patients on diary cards. Lung function and tolerability data were recorded at clinic visits following 4, 8, and 12 weeks' treatment. Efficacy was measured primarily by mean change from the run-in baseline in weekly morning PEF. Of the 222 patients randomized to treatment, 167 completed the study according to the protocol. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance indicated that the devices were clinically equivalent; a treatment difference of - 2.3 L/min separated the group mean changes in weekly morning PEF (95% confidence interval - 7.9 to 3.3). Secondary analyses also supported clinical comparability. This study demonstrates the comparable clinical efficacy and tolerability of budesonide Clickhaler and Turbuhaler devices in adult patients with stable asthma.     

High or standard initial dose of budesonide to control mild-to-moderate asthma?

Guidelines on the use of inhaled steroids in asthma advocate that the daily dose should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. However, the question of the optimal starting dose remains to be properly addressed, as does the issue of the adjustment in dose required for a given patient. Whether a high initial dose of budesonide (800 microg b.i.d) was more efficacious than a standard dose (200 microg b.i.d) in controlling mild-to-moderate asthma was investigated, and whether the dose could be decreased, based on peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom-score, beta2-agonist use in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 18-week study. One-hundred and sixty-nine patients (mean age 38 yrs, mean forced expiratory volume in one second 74% predicted) were enrolled. No difference was detected between the two groups in improvement in morning PEF (+61 L x min(-1) in the high-dose group, +60 L x min(-1) in the standard-dose group by 16 weeks). Morning and evening PEF values stabilized before the end of the first 4 weeks. No difference between groups was observed in symptom score, beta2-agonist use, number of exacerbation per interval and the best forced expiratory volume in one second achieved. The proportion of subjects being able to decrease the doses of budesonide was similar in both treatment strategies. It is concluded that both high and standard initial doses are equally effective in controlling symptoms and improving lung function in mild-to-moderate asthma.     

Low-dose budesonide with the addition of an increased dose during exacerbations is effective in long-term asthma control. On behalf of the Italian Study Group

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the effects of a 6-month treatment with budesonide 100 microg bid (low dose) and 400 microg bid (standard reference dose) in controlling symptoms and lung function in a group of asthmatics with moderate asthma (baseline FEV(1) > or = 50% and < or = 90% of predicted values) previously treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (500 to 1,000 microg/d). Moreover, we investigated whether or not asthma exacerbations could be treated by a short-term increase in the daily dose of budesonide. METHODS: After a 2-week run-in period and 1-month treatment with a high dose of budesonide (800 microg bid), 213 patients with moderate asthma were assigned to randomized treatments. Daily treatment included budesonide (bid) plus an additional treatment in case of exacerbation (qid for 7 days). Treatments were as follows: budesonide 400 microg plus placebo (group 1); budesonide 100 microg plus budesonide 200 microg (group 2); and budesonide 100 microg plus placebo (group 3). Symptoms and a peak expiratory flow (PEF) diary were recorded and lung function was measured each month. An exacerbation was defined as a decrease in PEF > 30% below baseline values on 2 consecutive days. RESULTS: We found that that 1-month treatment with a high budesonide dose remarkably reduced all asthma symptoms. Moreover, symptoms were under control in all treatment groups throughout the study period. Similarly, lung function improved and remained stable, and no relevant differences between groups were observed. In each treatment group, the majority of patients had no exacerbations. In patients treated with the standard budesonide dose (group 1), the number of exacerbations and days with exacerbations were significantly lower than in group 3 (intention-to-treat analysis). Additionally, patients treated with low budesonide dose plus budesonide (group 2) experienced a significantly lower number of exacerbations and days with exacerbations compared to group 3 (per-protocol analysis). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that when patients with moderate asthma had reached a stable clinical condition with a high dose of budesonide, a low dose of budesonide (200 microg/d) is as effective as the standard dose (800 microg/d) in the control of symptoms and lung function over a period of several months. Furthermore, results showed that the addition of inhaled budesonide (800 microg/d) at onset of an asthmatic exacerbation has a beneficial clinical effect.     

Longitudinal changes of pulmonary function and bronchial responsiveness in cough-variant asthma treated with bronchodilators alone.

Cough due to cough-variant asthma (CVA) responds well to bronchodilators such as beta 2 adrenergic agonists. The aim of this study was to assess longitudinal changes of pulmonary function and bronchial responsiveness in CVA, which was treated with bronchodilators alone. Seventeen CVA patients recorded intensity and frequency of cough every day. Spirometry and provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20) were measured in the run-in period and after cough almost completely relieved on therapy. Cough score had improved within 2 weeks after the initiation of bronchodilator therapy. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was significantly increased from 2.7 +/-0.7 L in the run-in period to 2.8+/-0.7 L after improvement of cough. However, the geometric mean (GSEM) PC20 value did not change from the run-in period [1542 (GSEM 1.29) microg/mL] to the time of improvement [2600 (GSEM 1.43) microg/mL]. Mildly increased bronchial responsiveness in CVA does not improve when only bronchodilator therapy is carried out. Because bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been shown to be a risk factor for typical asthma onset from CVA, the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the longitudinal changes in bronchial responsiveness should be examined.