Shaping the light/dark pattern for circadian adaptation to night shift work

This is the second in a series of simulated night shift studies designed to achieve and subsequently maintain a compromise circadian phase position between complete entrainment to the daytime sleep period and no phase shift at all. We predict that this compromise will yield improved night shift alertness and daytime sleep, while still permitting adequate late night sleep and daytime wakefulness on days off. Our goal is to delay the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) from its baseline phase of ∼ 21:00 to our target of ∼ 3:00. Healthy young subjects (n = 31) underwent three night shifts followed by two days off. Two experimental groups received intermittent bright light pulses during night shifts (total durations of 75 and 120 min per night shift), wore dark sunglasses when outside, slept in dark bedrooms at scheduled times after night shifts and on days off, and received outdoor light exposure upon awakening from sleep. A control group remained in dim room light during night shifts, wore lighter sunglasses, and had unrestricted sleep and outdoor light exposure. After the days off, the DLMO of the experimental groups was ∼ 00:00-1:00, not quite at the target of 3:00, but in a good position to reach the target after subsequent night shifts with bright light. The DLMO of the control group changed little from baseline. Experimental subjects performed better than control subjects during night shifts on a reaction time task. Subsequent studies will reveal whether the target phase is achieved and maintained through more alternations of night shifts and days off.     

Timed exposure to bright light improves sleep and alertness during simulated night shifts.

Many of the health and safety problems reported by shift workers result from the chronic sleep deprivation associated with shorter, fragmented daytime sleep. This reduction in the quality and duration of sleep has been attributed to a change in the phase relationship between the work period and the circadian system, timing the propensity for sleep and wakefulness. This study examined the extent to which appropriately timed exposure to bright light would accelerate the circadian readjustment of physiological parameters thought to contribute to impaired performance in shift workers. A control (n = 7) and treatment group (n = 6) underwent a 3-day transition to simulated night work. The treatment group received a single 4-hour pulse of bright light (6,000 lux) between 2400 and 0400 hours on the first night shift and dim light (less than 200 lux) for the remainder of the study. The control group received dim light throughout. By the third night shift, the phase position of the core body temperature rhythm for the treatment group had delayed by 5-6 hours whereas the control group had delayed by only 2-3 hours. When compared to the control group, the greater delay in core temperature rhythm for the treatment group was associated with significantly higher alertness across the night shift and improved sleep quality during the day. By the third day sleep, mean sleep efficiency in the treatment group was not significantly different from normal night sleep. Similarly, onshift alertness was improved relative to the control group. The treatment group did not show the typical decline in alertness observed in the control group between 0300 and 0700 hours. These data indicate that a single 4-hour pulse of bright light between midnight and 0400 hours is effective in ameliorating the sleep and alertness problems associated with transition to night shift.     

Suppression of sleepiness and melatonin by bright light exposure during breaks in night work

Night work is non-optimal for performance and recuperation because of a lack of circadian influence that fully promote a night orientation. Our study assessed, in an industrial setting, the effects of bright light exposure (BL) on sleepiness, sleep and melatonin, during night work and during the following readaptation to day work. In a crossover design, 18 workers at a truck production plant were exposed to either BL (2500 lx) during breaks or normal light during four consecutive weeks. Twenty minute breaks were initiated by 67% of the workers between 03:00 and 04:00 hours. Sleep/wake patterns were assessed through actigraphs and ratings were given in a sleep/wake diary. Saliva melatonin was measured at 2-h intervals before, during and after night shift weeks. A significant interaction demonstrated a reduction of sleepiness in the BL condition particularly on the first two nights at 04:00 and 06:00 hours. Day sleep in the BL condition was significantly lengthened. Bright light administration significantly suppressed melatonin levels during night work and most strongly at 02:00 hours. Daytime melatonin during the readaptation after night work remained unaffected. The present findings demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of photic stimulation in industrial settings to increase adaptation to night work.     

Daytime exposure to bright light, as compared to dim light, decreases sleepiness and improves psychomotor vigilance performance

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of bright light exposure, as compared to dim light, on daytime subjective sleepiness, incidences of slow eye movements (SEMs), and psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) performance following 2 nights of sleep restriction. DESIGN: The study had a mixed factorial design with 2 independent variables: light condition (bright light, 1,000 lux; dim light, < 5 lux) and time of day. The dependent variables were subjective sleepiness, PVT performance, incidences of SEMs, and salivary melatonin levels. SETTING: Sleep research laboratory at Monash University. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen healthy adults (10 women and 6 men) aged 18 to 35 years (mean age 25 years, 3 months). INTERVENTIONS: Following 2 nights of sleep restriction (5 hours each night), participants were exposed to modified constant routine conditions. Eight participants were exposed to bright light from noon until 5:00 pm. Outside the bright light exposure period (9:00 am to noon, 5:00 pm to 9:00 pm) light levels were maintained at less than 5 lux. A second group of 8 participants served as controls for the bright light exposure and were exposed to dim light throughout the entire protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Bright light exposure reduced subjective sleepiness, decreased SEMs, and improved PVT performance compared to dim light. Bright lights had no effect on salivary melatonin. A significant positive correlation between PVT reaction times and subjective sleepiness was observed for both groups. Changes in SEMs did not correlate significantly with either subjective sleepiness or PVT performance. CONCLUSIONS: Daytime bright light exposure can reduce the impact of sleep loss on sleepiness levels and performance, as compared to dim light. These effects appear to be mediated by mechanisms that are separate from melatonin suppression. The results may assist in the development of treatments for daytime sleepiness.     

Exposure to bright light and darkness to treat physiologic maladaptation to night work

Working at night results in a misalignment between the sleep-wake cycle and the output of the hypothalamic pacemaker that regulates the circadian rhythms of certain physiologic and behavioral variables. We evaluated whether such physiologic maladaptation to nighttime work could be prevented effectively by a treatment regimen of exposure to bright light during the night and darkness during the day. We assessed the functioning of the circadian pacemaker in five control and five treatment studies in order to assess the extent of adaptation in eight normal young men to a week of night work. In the control studies, on the sixth consecutive night of sedentary work in ordinary light (approximately 150 lux), the mean (+/- SEM) nadir of the endogenous temperature cycle continued to occur during the night (at 3:31 +/- 0:56 hours), indicating a lack of circadian adaptation to the nighttime work schedule. In contrast, the subjects in the treatment studies were exposed to bright light (7000 to 12,000 lux) at night and to nearly complete darkness during the day, and the temperature nadir shifted after four days of treatment to a significantly later, midafternoon hour (14:53 +/- 0:32; P less than 0.0001), indicating a successful circadian adaptation to daytime sleep and nighttime work. There were concomitant shifts in the 24-hour patterns of plasma cortisol concentration, urinary excretion rate, subjective assessment of alertness, and cognitive performance in the treatment studies. These shifts resulted in a significant improvement in both alertness and cognitive performance in the treatment group during the night-shift hours. We conclude that maladaptation of the human circadian system to night work, with its associated decline in alertness, performance, and quality of daytime sleep, can be treated effectively with scheduled exposure to bright light at night and darkness during the day.     

Combination of bright light and caffeine as a countermeasure for impaired alertness and performance during extended sleep deprivation

Effects of four conditions (Dim Light-Placebo, Dim Light-Caffeine, Bright Light-Placebo and Bright Light-Caffeine) on alertness, and performance were studied during the night-time hours across 45.5 h of sleep deprivation. Caffeine (200 mg) was administered at 20.00 and 02.00 hours and bright-light exposure (>2000 lux) was from 20.00 to 08.00 hours each night. The three treatment conditions, compared to the Dim Light-Placebo condition, enhanced night-time performance. Further, the combined treatment of caffeine and all-night bright light (Bright Light-Caffeine) enhanced performance to a larger degree than either the Dim Light-Caffeine or the Bright Light-Placebo condition. Beneficial effects of the treatments on performance were largest during the early morning hours (e.g. after 02.00 hours) when performance in the Dim Light-Placebo group was at its worst. Notably, the Bright Light-Caffeine condition was able to overcome the circadian drop in performance for most tasks measured. Both caffeine conditions improved objective alertness on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test. Taken together, the above results suggest that the combined treatment of bright light and caffeine provides an effective intervention for enhancing alertness and performance during sleep loss.     

On light as an alerting stimulus at night

Light exposure at night increases alertness; however, it is not clear if light affects nocturnal alertness in the same way that it affects measures of circadian regulation. The purpose of this study was to determine if a previously established functional relationship between light and nocturnal melatonin suppression was the same as that relating light exposure and nocturnal alertness. Four levels of narrow-band blue light at the cornea were presented during nighttime sessions. The ratio of electroencephalographic alpha power density with eyes closed to eyes open (alpha attenuation coefficient, AAC) and the Norris mood scale were used. The AAC and ratings of alertness increased monotonically with irradiance and were highly correlated. Both measures of alertness were highly correlated with model predictions of nocturnal melatonin suppression for the same circadian light stimulus, consistent with the inference that the suprachiasmatic nuclei play an important role in nocturnal alertness as well as circadian regulation.     

Association between melatonin secretion and daytime sleep complaints in night nurses

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that nightworkers' diurnal sleep complaints are associated with the timing of melatonin secretion. DESIGN: After a minimum of three consecutive night shifts, the subjects were admitted to the laboratory for 24 hours during which they were allowed to eat and sleep ad lib. Urine was collected every two hours under dim illumination (<25 lux). Concentration of urinary 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (UaMT6s) was determined by radioimmunoassay. Sleep quality was assessed by questionnaires. SETTING: NA PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of 15 night nurses with mild and severe daytime sleep complaints. INTERVENTIONS: NA RESULTS: The proportion of the episode of UaMT6s excretion happening during the day (between 08:00 and 00:00 hours) was smaller in the group of nightworkers with severe daytime sleep complaints, and was negatively correlated with the severity of the complaints over the 30 subjects. A longer duration of melatonin secretion was associated with a lower severity of daytime sleep complaints. However, in most of the subjects with good daytime sleep quality, melatonin secretion remained essentially nocturnal, and the overlap with the time of their sleep episode was small or even absent. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and duration of melatonin secretion were associated with better daytime sleep quality when the subjects had an increased proportion of melatonin secreted during the day. When there was an indication of circadian phase shift, the direction of the shift was not of primary importance for daytime sleep quality. A longer duration of melatonin secretion may increase the tolerance to an abnormal circadian phase.     

Promoting alertness with a short nap during a night shift

The use of a short (< 1 h) nap in improving alertness during the early morning hours in the first night shift was examined under laboratory conditions. The study contained four experimental, non-consecutive night shifts with a nap of either 50 or 30 min at 01.00 or 04.00 hours. An experimental night shift without a nap served as a control condition. Each experimental shift was followed by daytime sleep. Fourteen experienced male shift workers went through all of the experimental conditions. The results showed that the naps improved the ability to respond to visual signals during the second half of the night shift. Physiological sleepiness was alleviated by the early naps, as measured 50 min after awakening, but not at the end of the shift. Subjective sleepiness was somewhat decreased by the naps. The naps produced sleep inertia which lasted for about 10–15 min. Daytime sleep was somewhat impaired by the 50 min naps. The study shows that a nap shorter than 1 h is able to improve alertness to a certain extent during the first night shift.     

Sleepiness/alertness on a simulated night shift following sleep at home with triazolam

Physiological sleep tendency during a simulated night shift schedule was examined in 15 middle-aged subjects following daytime sleep after administration of triazolam or placebo. A double-blind, counterbalanced, crossover design involving two tours of five laboratory nights and four daytime home sleep periods was used. Triazolam lengthened daytime sleep as measured by wrist actigraph and improved nighttime alertness as measured by the MSLT. Sleepiness was most profound during the early morning hours (0430 to 0630) but improved significantly across nights for both conditions. Repeated test of sustained wakefulness latencies and simulated assembly line task performance decreased slightly across the night, but there were no significant condition effects. Subjective data tended to support objective measures, although Stanford Sleepiness Scale ratings indicated that subjects did not perceive improved alertness at night after triazolam-aided daytime sleep.     

Complete or partial circadian re-entrainment improves performance, alertness, and mood during night-shift work

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess performance, alertness, and mood during the night shift and subsequent daytime sleep in relation to the degree of re-alignment (re-entrainment) of circadian rhythms with a night-work, day-sleep schedule. DESIGN: Subjects spent 5 consecutive night shifts (11:00 pm-7:00 am) in the lab and slept at home in darkened bedrooms (8:30 am-3:30 pm). Subjects were categorized by the degree of re-entrainment attained after the 5 night shifts. Completely re-entrained: temperature minimum in the second half of daytime sleep; partially re-entrained: temperature minimum in the first half of daytime sleep; not re-entrained: temperature minimum did not delay enough to reach daytime sleep. SETTING: See above. PARTICIPANTS: Young healthy adults (n = 67) who were not shift workers. INTERVENTIONS: Included bright light during the night shifts, sunglasses worn outside, a fixed dark daytime sleep episode, and melatonin. The effects of various combinations of these interventions on circadian re-entrainment were previously reported. Here we report how the degree of re-entrainment affected daytime sleep and measures collected during the night shift. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Salivary melatonin was collected every 30 minutes in dim light (<20 lux) before and after the night shifts to determine the dim light melatonin onset, and the temperature minimum was estimated by adding a constant (7 hours) to the dim light melatonin onset. Subjects kept sleep logs, which were verified by actigraphy. The Neurobehavioral Assessment Battery was completed several times during each night shift. Baseline sleep schedules and circadian phase differed among the 3 re-entrainment groups, with later times resulting in more re-entrainment. The Neurobehavioral Assessment Battery showed that performance, sleepiness, and mood were better in the groups that re-entrained compared to the group that did not re-entrain, but there were no significant differences between the partial and complete re-entrainment groups. Subjects slept almost all of the allotted 7 hours during the day, and duration did not significantly differ among the re-entrainment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In young people, complete re-entrainment to the night-shift day-sleep schedule is not necessary to produce substantial benefits in neurobehavioral measures; partial re-entrainment (delaying the temperature minimum into the beginning of daytime sleep) is sufficient. The group that did not re-entrain shows that a reasonable amount of daytime sleep is not enough to produce good neurobehavioral performance during the night shift. Therefore, some re-alignment of circadian rhythms is recommended.     

Circadian rhythms of melatonin, cortisol, and clock gene expression during simulated night shift work

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The synchronization of peripheral circadian oscillators in humans living on atypical sleep/wake schedules is largely unknown. In this night shift work simulation, we evaluate clock gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) relative to reliable markers of the central circadian pacemaker. DESIGN: Participants were placed on a 10-hr delayed sleep/wake schedule simulating nighttime work followed by a daytime sleep episode. SETTING: Baseline, intermediate and final circadian evaluations were performed in the temporal isolation laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Five healthy candidates, 18-30 years. INTERVENTIONS: Polychromatic white light of (mean +/-SEM) 6,036 +/-326 lux (approximately 17,685 +/-955 W/m2) during night shifts; dim light exposure after each night shift; an 8-hr sleep/darkness episode beginning 2 hrs after the end of each night shift. MEASUREMENTS: Melatonin and cortisol in plasma; clock genes HPER1, HPER2 and HBMAL1 RNA in PBMCs. RESULTS: Following 9 days on the night schedule, hormonal rhythms were adapted to the shifted schedule. HPER1 and HPER2 expression in PBMCs displayed significant circadian rhythmicity, which was in a conventional relationship with the shifted sleep/wake schedule. Changes in the pattern of clock gene expression were apparent as of 3 days on the shifted sleep/wake schedule. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study is the first documentation of the effects of a shifted sleep/wake schedule on the circadian expression of both peripheral circadian oscillators in PBMCs and centrally-driven hormonal rhythms. In light of evidence associating clock gene expression with tissue function, the study of peripheral circadian oscillators has important implications for understanding medical disorders affecting night shift workers.     

Physiological sleep tendency on a simulated night shift: adaptation and effects of triazolam

Daytime sleep and nocturnal sleepiness were examined in 18 normal sleepers (9 young adults, 9 middle-age adults) for 5.5 days following acute sleep/wake schedule inversion. Triazolam and placebo were compared in a counterbalanced, crossover design. Triazolam improved daytime sleep, but did not produce significant changes in sleep tendency at night. Physiological sleep tendency in the early morning hours (0200 to 0600) was profound, but decreased significantly within 3 to 4 days following sleep/wake inversion, irrespective of treatment condition. Nocturnal performance data generally were consistent with changes in physiological sleep tendency. We conclude that extending daytime sleep by an average of approximately 50 min per day via administration of a hypnotic does not appear to significantly reduce circadian sleep tendency in the early morning hours. Further, considerable adaptation, in terms of sleep tendency, occurred within a weak of simulated night shift despite a relatively constant daytime sleep pattern.     

Evening ambient light exposure can reduce circadian phase advances to morning light independent of sleep deprivation

Short sleep/dark durations are common in modern society. We investigated if exposure to additional evening ambient light, often associated with later bedtimes and short sleep, reduces circadian phase advances to morning bright light. Twelve healthy subjects participated in two conditions that differed in the distribution of sleep before exposure to morning bright light. Subjects had a consolidated 9‐h night time sleep opportunity, or a 3‐h daytime nap followed by a 6‐h night time sleep opportunity, each before morning bright light. Eight of the 12 subjects obtained similar amounts of sleep in both conditions, and yet still showed significant reductions in phase advances with 6‐h nights (1.7 versus 0.7 h, P < 0.05). These results suggest that the exposure to additional evening ambient light often associated with short sleep episodes can significantly reduce phase advances to morning light, and may therefore increase the risk for circadian misalignment.     

Modification of internal temperature regulation for cutaneous vasodilation and sweating by bright light exposure at night

Bright light (BL) exposure at night leads to suppressed secretion of melatonin and an attenuated fall in internal temperature at rest from the night to the early morning. However, it is unknown at the present whether typical diurnal variations in reflex responses to thermal challenges are similarly affected by BL exposure at night. We investigated the control of cutaneous vasodilator and sweating responses to hyperthermia in the early morning after artificial BL exposure at night, compare with dim light (DL) exposure. Six subjects stayed awake in a semi-supine position under DL (120 lx) or BL (2800 lx) conditions between 21.00 and 04.30 h. Urine samples were collected at 04.30 h. Beginning at 05.30 h, the lower legs were immersed for 50 min in 42°C water. The subjects remained awake for 21 h until the end of hot water immersion. Urinary 6-sulphatoxymelatonin levels following BL were significantly lower than after DL. Oesophageal temperature (T_es) before heating was significantly higher following BL [36.41±0.10 (DL) vs. 36.55±0.09 (BL)°C]. The T_es thresholds for the onset of cutaneous vasodilation and sweating were significantly higher with BL than with DL conditions (approximately 0.15°C, respectively). We found that the internal temperature threshold for thermoregulatory control of cutaneous vasodilation and sweating responses to passive heating in the early morning can be modified by the level of light exposure the prior night. Thus both basal internal temperature and the regulation of internal temperature are modified by BL exposure at night.     

Enhancement of nighttime alertness and performance with bright ambient light

Objective levels of alertness and performance efficiency were measured in twenty-five healthy young adults during two simulated night shifts. Following the first night shift, during which all subjects worked under dim ambient light (10-20 lux), subjects were assigned to one of three ambient lighting conditions (10-20 lux, 100 lux or 1000 lux) for the second night of work. Subjects exposed to 1000 lux ambient light maintained significantly higher levels of alertness across the 8-hour shift than did subjects exposed to the dimmer lighting conditions. Cognitive performance was also significantly enhanced under the bright light condition, whereas simple reaction time was not. The findings indicate clearly that ambient lighting levels can have a substantial impact on nighttime alertness and performance and that bright ambient illumination may be effective in maintaining optimal levels of alertness during night shift operations.     

Effects of melatonin administration on daytime sleep after simulated night shift work

Disturbed sleep and on-the-job sleepiness are widespread problems among night shift workers. The pineal hormone melatonin may prove to be a useful treatment because it has both sleep-promoting and circadian phase-shifting effects. This study was designed to isolate melatonin's sleep-promoting effects, and to determine whether melatonin could improve daytime sleep and thus improve night time alertness and performance during the night shift. The study utilized a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design. Subjects (n=21, mean age=27.0 +/- 5.0 years) participated in two 6-day laboratory sessions. Each session included one adaptation night, two baseline nights, two consecutive 8-h night shifts followed by 8-h daytime sleep episodes and one recovery night. Subjects took 1.8 mg sustained-release melatonin 0.5 h before the two daytime sleep episodes during one session, and placebo before the daytime sleep episodes during the other session. Sleep was recorded using polysomnography. Sleepiness, performance, and mood during the night shifts were evaluated using the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) and a computerized neurobehavioral testing battery. Melatonin prevented the decrease in sleep time during daytime sleep relative to baseline, but only on the first day of melatonin administration. Melatonin increased sleep time more in subjects who demonstrated difficulty in sleeping during the day. Melatonin had no effect on alertness on the MSLT, or performance and mood during the night shift. There were no hangover effects from melatonin administration. These findings suggest that although melatonin can help night workers obtain more sleep during the day, they are still likely to face difficulties working at night because of circadian rhythm misalignment. The possibility of tolerance to the sleep-promoting effects of melatonin across more than 1 day needs further investigation.     

Photostimulation of blackheaded bunting: subjective interpretation of day and night depends upon both photophase contrast and light intensity.

Blackheaded buntings were exposed to constant dim light (approximately 2 lux) for 77 days and subsequently to 12:12 illumination, consisting of either dim light:complete darkness (dl:dk) (2:0 lux) or bright light:dim light (bl:dl) (10, 35, and 90 lux:2, 10, and 35 lux, respectively, with 180 degrees bl:dl transitions) for 2-3 weeks each. Birds were unstimulated until day 100, under dim LL (dl:dl) and 12dl:12dk. Photostimulation with a significant increase (p less than 0.001) in average body weight and testis volume occurred on exposure to 12bl:12dl (10:2 lux); birds remained fat and testes were enlarged until the end (day 173) of the experiment. Locomotor activity also did not have a discernible pattern under the nongonadostimulatory photoregimes. Birds became active in the bright photophase (subjective day) of 12bl:12dl (10:2 lux) on day 5 (day 105 of the experiment), but beginning on day 113 more intense perch-hopping was initiated in the dim photophase (subjective night), indicating the appearance of nocturnal migratory restlessness in the caged birds. A 180 degrees transition in the bl:dl photophases at this time for 2 weeks resulted in complete shift in the timing of daytime and nighttime activity. This trend is maintained under all subsequent 12bl:12dl exposures. These results suggest that the light intensity required for photostimulation in the blackheaded bunting is absolute, and that the subjective interpretation of day and night depends upon the photophase contrast, as well.     

Effect of a single 3-hour exposure to bright light on core body temperature and sleep in humans

Seven human subjects were exposed to bright light (BL, approx. 2500 lux) and dim light (DL, approx. 6 lux) during 3 h prior to nocturnal sleep, in a cross-over design. At the end of the BL exposure period core body temperature was significantly higher than at the end of the DL exposure period. The difference in core body temperature persisted during the first 4 h of sleep. The latency to sleep onset was increased after BL exposure. Rapid-eye movement sleep (REMS) and slow-wave sleep (SWS; stage 3 + 4 of non-REMS) were not significantly changed. Eight subjects were exposed to BL from 20.30 to 23.30 h while their eyes were covered or uncovered. During BL exposure with uncovered eyes, core body temperature decreased significantly less than during exposure with covered eyes. We conclude that bright light immediately affects core body temperature and that this effect is mediated via the eyes.     

Bright light treatment used for adaptation to night work and re-adaptation back to day life. A field study at an oil platform in the North Sea

Night workers complain of sleepiness, reduced performance and disturbed sleep due to lack of adjustment of the circadian rhythm. In simulated night-work experiments scheduled exposure to bright light has been shown to reduce these complaints. Here we studied the effects of bright light treatment on the adaptation to 14 days of consecutive night work at an oil platform in the North Sea, and the subsequent readaptation to day life at home, using the Karolinska sleep/wake diary. Bright light treatment of 30 min per exposure was applied during the first 4 nights of the night-shift period and the first 4 days at home following the shift period. The bright light exposure was scheduled individually to phase delay the circadian rhythm. Bright light treatment modestly facilitated the subjective adaptation to night work, but the positive effect of bright light was especially pronounced during the re-adaptation back to day life following the return home. Sleepiness was reduced and the quality of day was rated better after exposure to bright light. The modest effect of bright light at the platform was, possibly, related to the finding that the workers seemed to adapt to night work within a few days even without bright light. These results suggest that short-term bright light treatment may help the adaptation to an extended night-work period, and especially the subsequent re-adaptation to day life.