依诺肝素0.75 mg/kg动脉推注在冠状动脉造影和介入术中的应用

目的在中国人群中评价冠状动脉（冠脉）造影和经皮经腔冠脉介入术（PCI）中应用依诺肝素0．75mg／kg经动脉鞘管注射抗凝的安全性及有效性。方法160例择期PCI术患者随机分为两组,依诺肝素组给予依诺肝素0．75mg／kg,手术时间超过90min者再给0．3mg／kg;普通肝素组给予普通肝素100U／kg。结果注射依诺肝素后2h内,患者血浆抗Xa因子水平在0．5IU／ml以上。补充依诺肝素后可使所有患者血浆抗Xa因子水平4h内维持于0．5IU／ml以上。依诺肝素组鞘管内血栓发生率明显高于普通肝素组（26．6％比10．0％,P〈0．001）。两组30d内不良临床事件和出血事件发生率相似。结论择期PGI术中应用依诺肝素0．75mg／kg经动脉鞘管弹丸式注射进行抗凝是安全和有效的,有效抗凝强度至少可维持2h,手术时间超过2h的患者应补充依诺肝素。     

Impact of anticoagulation regimens on sheath management and bleeding in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention in the STEEPLE trial

Objective: To evaluate the impact of sheath management on bleeding rates. Background: The procedural characteristics and anticoagulant regimen determine the frequency of postoperative bleeding complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This subanalysis of the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial evaluated the relative impact of enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the rate of non‐coronary artery bypass graft‐related major and minor bleeding, according to sheath management procedures in 3,528 patients undergoing elective PCI with a femoral approach. Results: Sheaths were removed at a median time of 54 min with enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg, compared with 3 hr 14 min with enoxaparin 0.75 mg/kg and 2 hr 24 min with UFH. Early sheath removal (within 30 min from the end of PCI) was associated with reduced bleeding in patients receiving 0.5 or 0.75 mg/kg enoxaparin compared with UFH (enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg: 4.9% vs. 10.8%; P < 0.001; enoxaparin 0.75 mg/kg: 5.0% vs. 10.8%; P < 0.001). Compared with UFH, major and minor bleeding was halved when enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg) was used in combination with a closure device (4.4% and 5.3% vs. 10.5% with UFH) or smaller (<7 Fr) sheath sizes (4.9% and 6.0% vs. 9.3%). Conclusion: This analysis shows that early sheath removal can be performed safely following elective PCI in patients receiving enoxaparin. Enoxaparin use was associated with less major and minor bleeding compared with UFH, when either a closure device or a smaller sheath size was used. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether enoxaparin (ENOX) is superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) as adjunctive therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who receive fibrinolytic therapy and subsequently undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by analyzing data from the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial. BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the use of ENOX compared with UFH as adjunctive therapy in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy and subsequent PCI. METHODS: A total of 20,479 STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy were randomized to a strategy of ENOX throughout index hospitalization or UFH for at least 48 h, with blinded study drug to continue if PCI was performed. The primary end point of death or recurrent MI through 30 days was compared for ENOX versus UFH among the patients who underwent subsequent PCI (n = 4,676). RESULTS: After initial fibrinolysis, fewer patients underwent PCI through 30 days in the ENOX versus the UFH group (22.8% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.027). Among patients who underwent PCI by 30 days, the primary end point occurred in 10.7% of ENOX and 13.8% of UFH patients (0.77 relative risk; p < 0.001). There were no differences in major bleeding for ENOX versus UFH (1.4% vs. 1.6%; p = NS). Results were similar when PCI was carried out in patients receiving blinded study drug during PCI (n = 2,178). CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI who underwent subsequent PCI, ENOX administration was associated with a reduced risk of death or recurrent MI without difference in the risk of major bleeding. The strategy of ENOX support for fibrinolytic therapy followed by PCI is superior to UFH and provides a seamless transition from the medical management to the interventional management phase of STEMI without the need for introducing a second anticoagulant in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.     

A unique,low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine a unique and low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that would be applicable to an unselected population regardless of age, weight, renal function, or use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. BACKGROUND: There is limited experience of anticoagulation using intravenous (IV) low-molecular-weight heparin in PCI, which has been obtained with high doses causing elevated anticoagulation levels and delayed sheath withdrawal. METHODS: A total of 242 consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI were treated with a single IV bolus of enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg), and 26% of patients (n = 64) also received eptifibatide. Sheaths were removed immediately after the procedure in patients treated with enoxaparin only, and 4 h after the procedure in those also treated with eptifibatide. RESULTS: A peak anti-Xa >0.5 IU/ml was obtained in 97.5% of the population, and 94.6% of patients had their peak anti-Xa level in the predefined target range of 0.5 to 1.5 IU/ml. Advanced age, renal failure, being overweight, and eptifibatide use did not alter the anticoagulation profile. At one-month follow-up, six patients (2.5%) had died, had a myocardial infarction, or undergone an urgent revascularization; all the patients had an anti-Xa level >0.5 IU/ml during PCI. Patients without an ischemic event and without a creatine kinase rise, but with a detectable troponin release in the next 24 h of PCI (>2 microg/ml, n = 21), had similar anti-Xa levels as those without troponin elevation. There were one major and three minor bleeding events that were not associated with anti-Xa overshoot. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose (0.5 mg/kg) IV enoxaparin allows a prespecified target level of anticoagulation (anti-Xa >0.5 IU/ml) in the vast majority of patients undergoing PCI, appears to be safe and effective, allows immediate sheath removal when used alone, and does not require dose adjustment when used with eptifibatide.     

Outcome of urgent and elective percutaneous coronary interventions after pharmacologic reperfusion with tenecteplase combined with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, or abciximab

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of New Thrombolytic Regimens (ASSENT-3) trial. BACKGROUND: In the ASSENT-3 trial, co-therapy with abciximab (ABC) or enoxaparin (ENOX) reduced ischemic complications after ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with tenecteplase when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). The effect of these new co-therapies on the results of PCI is unknown. METHODS: Clinical outcomes in patients who received co-therapy with ABC, ENOX, or UFH and subsequently underwent an elective (n = 1,064) or urgent (n = 716) PCI in the ASSENT-3 trial were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences in clinical end points were observed in patients who underwent an elective PCI. A non-significant trend toward fewer in-hospital myocardial re-infarctions was seen with ABC and ENOX when compared with UFH (0.5% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.5%, respectively). The incidence of bleeding complications was similar in the three treatment arms. Significantly fewer ABC- and ENOX-treated patients needed urgent PCI compared with UFH (9.1% vs. 11.9% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.0001), but outcomes in these patients were in general less favorable (30-day mortality: 8.2% vs. 5.4% vs. 4.5%; 1-year mortality: 11.0% vs. 8.5% vs. 5.6%; in-hospital re-infarction: 3.9% vs. 2.5% vs. 2.7%; major bleeding complications: 8.8% vs. 7.0% vs. 3.4%). In pairwise comparisons with UFH, the higher one-year mortality and major bleeding rates after ABC were statistically significant (p = 0.045 and p = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after elective PCI were similar with the three antithrombotic co-therapies studied in ASSENT-3. Although fewer patients needed urgent PCI with ABC and ENOX, clinical outcomes were less favorable in this selected population, especially with ABC.     

Randomized controlled trial of topical hemostasis pad use for achieving vascular hemostasis following percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a randomized trial to determine the efficacy of two topical hemostasis pads in promoting vascular hemostasis following PCI, and to assess the appropriate level of anticoagulation for sheath removal. BACKGROUND: Pads coated with procoagulant materials are widely marketed and used to augment vascular hemostasis following PCI, yet clinical effectiveness and safety data are lacking. METHODS: 184 patients who underwent PCI using the femoral approach were randomized to one of four methods of sheath removal: (1) at ACT < 250 using the Chito-Seal pad; (2) at ACT < 250 using the Clo-Sur PAD; (3) at ACT < 250 using manual compression alone; (4) at ACT < 170 using manual compression alone. RESULTS: Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the hemostasis pad groups compared to the conventional compression groups (16.2 +/- 4.9, 16.0 +/- 5.3, 19.3 +/- 7.8, and 18.3 +/- 5.7 min, respectively, P = 0.027), however overall bed rest times following intervention were not reduced by use of either hemostasis pad. The incidence of major or minor bleeding complications did not differ among groups. Irrespective of hemostasis pad use, removal of sheaths at higher ACT levels allowed shorter time to ambulation following PCI without an increase in bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: The hemostasis pads tested shortened time to hemostasis compared to standard manual compression, although the absolute reduction in time to hemostasis was relatively small and did not translate into a reduction in overall bed rest time. Independent of hemostasis pad use, removal of arterial sheaths at higher than conventional activated clotting times was safe and resulted in significant reductions in time to ambulation.     

Assessment of anticoagulation using activated clotting times in patients receiving intravenous enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Enoxaparin is being used more frequently in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, we determined the effect of intravenous enoxaparin on activated clotting time (ACT) measurements in the setting of PCI. In 67 consecutive patients, either 1 mg/kg intravenous enoxaparin alone was given for anticoagulation or 0.75 mg/kg given in patients receiving eptifibatide. ACT was measured before and 5 min following enoxaparin administration. After 1 mg/kg enoxaparin (n = 22), mean ACT increased from 122 +/- 22 to 199 +/- 20 sec. After 0.75 mg/kg enoxaparin and eptifibatide (n = 45), mean ACT increased from 125 +/- 22 to 194 +/- 24 sec. The mean increase in ACT was 77 +/- 26 sec in the 1 mg/kg group and 69 +/- 23 sec in the 0.75 mg/kg group (both P values < 0.0001). Moreover, in a subgroup of 26 patients, there was an excellent correlation (r = 0.86) between ACTs and the ENOX test, a new point-of-care test for assessing enoxaparin anticoagulation. None of the patients had transient abrupt closure, thrombus formation, major bleeding, or required urgent revascularization. Intravenous enoxaparin at clinically relevant doses with and without eptifibatide increases ACT levels at 5 min in patients undergoing PCI. These data suggest the ACT may be useful in the assessment of anticoagulation by enoxaparin.     

Enoxaparin and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Canadian perspective

BACKGROUND: The low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin is commonly used in the management of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It is perceived that there is variable acceptance of the use of enoxaparin in patients with ACS in conjunction with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by Canadian interventional cardiologists, as well as diverse approaches to the procedural (ie, PCI) management of anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey assessing physician and centre demographics, as well as the opinion and approach to the use of enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI, was developed. All 141 interventional cardiologists performing PCI in Canada were sent the survey, with a 52% response rate. The majority (64%) of respondents were comfortable performing PCI during enoxaparin treatment, but almost one-half (46.5%) stated a preference to have a point-of-care measurement of the anticoagulation level during the procedure. Various 'top-up' protocols are used across the country, including fixed-dose intravenous (IV) enoxaparin, weight-adjusted IV enoxaparin, fixed-dose IV unfractionated heparin, weight-adjusted IV unfractionated heparin and IV unfractionated heparin titrated to a target activated clotting time. Although the median time threshold for administering a 'top-up' dose of anticoagulation matched current recommendations, there was a wide variation ranging from 2 h to 10 h (median 8 h). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of Canadian interventional cardiologists were comfortable performing PCI in patients treated with enoxaparin, the survey demonstrated various levels of confidence and a diverse range of 'top-up' anticoagulation procedures. Nationwide guidelines for the management of anticoagulation in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with enoxaparin should be developed from the best available clinical and research evidence to limit potential patient risk of inadequate or excessive anticoagulation. This is especially relevant in view of the association between switching among anticoagulant therapies and an increased bleeding risk in patients undergoing early cardiac catheterization and PCI that was found in the recently reported Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial.     

Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removal.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to analyze the impact of arterial access site, sheath size, timing of sheath removal, and use of access site closure devices on high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: In the SYNERGY trial, 9,978 patients with ACS were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. METHODS: This analysis includes 9,404 patients for whom sheath access information was obtained for the first PCI procedure or diagnostic catheterization. Comparisons of baseline, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were carried out according to access site and sheath size. RESULTS: Overall, 9,404 (94%) patients underwent angiography at a median of 21 hr (25th and 75th percentiles: 5, 42) and 4,687 (50%) underwent PCI at a median of 23 hr (6,49) of enrollment. The access site was femoral for 94.9% of cases, radial for 4.4%, and brachial for 0.7%. Radial access was associated with fewer transfusions than femoral access (0.9% vs. 4.8%, P=0.007). For femoral access, the rates of noncoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related TIMI major bleeding by sheath size was 1.5% for 4 or 5 French (Fr), 1.6% for 6 Fr, 3.3% for 7 Fr, and 3.8% for >or=8 Fr (P<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, femoral access site, larger sheath size, and delayed sheath removal were independent predictors of need for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller sheaths, radial access, and timely sheath removal may mitigate the bleeding risk associated with potent antithrombotic/platelet therapy and early catheterization.     

Bleeding risk and outcomes of Bivalirudin versus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors with targeted low-dose unfractionated Heparin in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention for either stable or unstable angina pectoris

For patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin was previously shown to significantly reduce bleeding complications at the cost of a modest increase in ischemic events compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). However, the excess bleeding in patients treated with UFH and GPIs may have been caused by excessively high UFH doses and increased activated clotting times. This study sought to determine the bleeding risk of targeted low-dose UFH with GPIs compared with bivalirudin in patients undergoing elective PCI. Of 1,205 patients undergoing elective PCI, 602 underwent PCI with adjunctive UFH and GPIs with the UFH dose targeted to an activated clotting time of approximately 250 seconds, and 603 patients matched for baseline characteristics underwent PCI with bivalirudin. Outcomes were analyzed for major bleeding (hematocrit decrease >15%, gastrointestinal bleed, or major hematoma) and 6-month major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization). The maximum activated clotting time achieved was 261.7 +/- 61.6 seconds in the UFH/GPI group and 355.4 +/- 66.6 in the bivalirudin group (p <0.001). In-hospital major bleeding rates were similar between groups (1.8% UFH/GPI vs 1.7% bivalirudin; p = 0.83), as were transfusion requirements (1.2% UFH/GPI vs 0.5% bivalirudin; p = 0.61). The 6-month major adverse cardiac event rate was also similar between groups (9.5% UFH/GPI vs 9.0% bivalirudin; p = 0.81). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in major bleeding and 6-month major adverse cardiac events for patients undergoing elective PCI treated with targeted low-dose UFH and GPIs compared with those treated with bivalirudin.     

Stable and optimal anticoagulation is achieved with a single dose of intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

This study assessed the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Sixty consecutive patients [(age, 62 11 years; female, 16%; diabetes, 18%; hypertension, 53%; prior myocardial infarction (MI), 43%] undergoing PCI (stable angina, 89%; stent, 92%; two-vessel disease, 23%; B2/C lesions, 45%) were administered intravenous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg for procedural anticoagulation. Blood samples for anti-Xa level and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were assayed from the first 20 patients before and after enoxaparin administration at the following intervals: 5, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 360 and 480 minutes. Activated clotting time was assessed 5 minutes after enoxaparin administration. Bleeding complications were classified according to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria. All patients were monitored for adverse clinical events at clinic visit 4 8 weeks after hospital discharge. No TIMI major or minor bleedings occurred during hospitalization for the PCI (median stay post-PCI = 1 day). One patient (2%) developed a non-Q wave MI after the PCI and before hospital discharge. There was no death or urgent revascularization up to clinical follow-up. The peak anti-Xa level was 1.30 0.18 IU/ml (range, 1.03 1.69 IU/ml). The minimum anti-Xa level was 0.55 IU/ml 4 hours after enoxaparin. Thus, the use of intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI is associated with a low incidence of ischemic and bleeding complications. A stable therapeutic anticoagulant effect is provided without the need for monitoring within 4 hours of enoxaparin administration.     

The use of a HEMOCHRON® JR. HEMONOX™ point of care test in monitoring the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin during interventional coronary procedures

Background: Enoxaparin is increasingly used for the anticoagulation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several reports have suggested the utility of using point of care tests in monitoring the anticoagulation levels of enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new point-of-care test (POCT) HEMONOX? in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin in non citrated fresh whole blood samples from patients undergoing elective PCI procedure. Methods: Following IRB approval, blood samples were obtained from fifty-four patients who received two sequential intravenous doses of enoxaparin; 0.1 mg/kg followed 5 min later by 0.4 mg/kg for a total of 0.5 mg/kg. Blood was drawn at baseline and at 5, 10, 30 and 60 min post first bolus for evaluation in the clot-based POCT HEMONOX, ACT and aPTT and the chromogenic anti-Xa activity assay. Results: HEMONOX clotting time (CT) at baseline was 62.6 ± 6.2 secs, (n = 32) in healthy donors and statistically higher in PCI patients (71.6 ± 9.1 secs, p = 0.0001). The peak HEMONOX response that was always achieved at 10 min post bolus was >100 secs in all 54 patients, of these 83% yielded CT >150 secs (range: 150–466). There was no detectable anti-Xa activity level at baseline while peak HEMONOX CT corresponded to therapeutic levels (0.85 ± 0.14 U/ml; range: 0.61–1.34). Both HEMONOX CT and anti-Xa level significantly decreased at the time of sheath removal. HEMONOX CT at peak response suggested 3 patient subgroups with different levels of sensitivity to enoxaparin: low, intermediate and high responders. The correlation between anti-Xa activity level and HEMONOX CT was ≥0.85 in each patient subgroup when data from the 3 critical time points; baseline (absence of drug), peak response (10 min post bolus) and sheath removal (60 min post bolus) were analyzed. The correlation diminished to ≥0.83 when the analyses included data from all 5 time points [baseline, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min post bolus]. The HEMONOX test was the most sensitive POCT to measure the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin. All patients completed PCI successfully. Conclusion: The HEMONOX test may be able to guide anticoagulation with enoxaparin during PCI.     

Safety of concomitant therapy with eptifibatide and enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Coronary Revascularization Using Integrilin and Single bolus Enoxaparin Study

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess whether use of enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased bleeding compared with unfractionated heparin, in addition to background therapy with eptifibatide. BACKGROUND: Data supporting the benefits of enoxaparin and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide evolved in parallel. Information on combining these two classes of medications is limited. METHODS: A total of 261 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI were randomized to either eptifibatide plus enoxaparin or eptifibatide plus unfractionated heparin. RESULTS: The primary end point of the study, the bleeding index (change in hemoglobin corrected for blood transfusions), was 0.8 in the patients randomized to enoxaparin and 1.1 in patients randomized to unfractionated heparin (p = 0.15). The rate of vascular access site complications was 9.3% in the enoxaparin arm versus 9.8% in the unfractionated heparin arm (p = NS). The rate of bleeding complications was not significantly different between the two arms of the study, including in those patients who received vascular closure devices. The rate of angiographic complications was 6.3% in the enoxaparin group and 6.2% in the unfractionated heparin group (p = NS). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization at 48 h or 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide, the combination of enoxaparin plus eptifibatide is not associated with an excess of bleeding or vascular complications, including in those receiving closure devices. Despite no monitoring of anticoagulation activity with enoxaparin, there was no apparent increase in angiographic or clinical complications.     

The impact of renal dysfunction on outcomes in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial.

OBJECTIVES: The ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial provided the opportunity to evaluate the impact of renal dysfunction on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and compare enoxaparin (ENOX) and unfractionated heparin (UFH). BACKGROUND: It is unclear how renal dysfunction influences the balance between benefit and risk of antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: In the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial, 20,479 patients were randomized to UFH or ENOX. A reduced ENOX dose was administered to patients age > or =75 years and those with an estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) <30 ml/min. RESULTS: A powerful relationship was observed between the severity of renal dysfunction (per 10 ml/min decrement in CrCl) and death, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and major and minor bleeding (p < 0.001 for each). There was a progressive increase in the treatment benefit with ENOX on death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (p < 0.01) with better renal function. Net clinical benefit (death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal major bleeding) was significantly superior with ENOX (p < 0.001) for patients with a CrCl >60 ml/min (79.1% of the study population). Major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ for patients with preserved renal function (CrCl >90 ml/min), but in those with renal dysfunction there was a progressively greater increase in the risk of major and minor bleeding with ENOX. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin was superior to UFH for the majority of subjects. With more severe renal dysfunction, the net clinical benefit between ENOX and UFH did not differ, despite the rise in adverse events in both treatment groups. Future studies should take renal dysfunction into account when assessing antithrombotic regimens.     

The Angiomax Peripheral Procedure Registry of Vascular Events Trial (APPROVE): in-hospital and 30-day results

BACKGROUND: High-risk patient characteristics and complexity of percutaneous peripheral intervention (PPI) procedures suggest a need for predictable and reliable anticoagulation. We undertook this study to assess the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin as the procedural anticoagulant in patients undergoing PPI of the renal, iliac, or femoral artery. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, single arm study inpatients undergoing PPI of the renal, iliac, or femoral vessels to assessbivalirudin as the sole procedural anticoagulant (0.75 mg/kg bolus/1.75 mg/kg/hr infusion). The primary endpoint was procedural success defined as residual stenosis < 20%. Secondary endpoints included ischemic events (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and amputation), and bleeding complications, as well as ACT values and times to sheath removal, ambulation, and discharge. RESULTS: 505 patients were enrolled at 26 sites. Procedural success was achieved in 95.0% of patients. Ischemic events were low (1.4%) and similar between vessel types. Protocol-defined major hemorrhage and TIMI major hemorrhage rates were 2.2% and 0.4%, respectively. Mean ACTs were similar among treatment groups (renal 353.8 seconds(s); iliac 335.9s, femoral, 343.5s). CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin provided consistent anticoagulation and similar outcomes in all vessel types treated at the dose tested. Ischemic and bleeding event rates were low, demonstrating the safe use of bivalirudin as a procedural anticoagulant in PPI.     

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction also treated with clopidogrel.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin (ENOX) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving fibrinolytic therapy with and without clopidogrel. BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of ENOX and clopidogrel given together in STEMI remains to be defined. METHODS: We compared the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as well as the rates of bleeding in medically managed patients randomized to ENOX versus UFH in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial, stratified by concomitant clopidogrel use. RESULTS: Enoxaparin significantly reduced the rate of the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, or stroke, compared with UFH, both in patients (n = 2,173) treated with clopidogrel (10.8% vs. 13.9%, adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)] 0.70, p = 0.013) and in patients (n = 12,918) not treated with clopidogrel (13.3% vs. 15.3%, OR(adj) 0.85, p = 0.003) with no evidence of heterogeneity (p(interaction) = 0.21). The excess risk of TIMI major bleeding with ENOX versus UFH was numerically but not statistically significantly higher in patients treated with clopidogrel (2.7% vs. 1.0%) versus those who were not (2.1% vs. 1.2%) (p(interaction) = 0.61). Net clinical benefit (MACE and major bleeding) favored treatment with ENOX over UFH, either with concomitant clopidogrel (absolute risk reduction 2.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.5% to 5.3%) or without (absolute risk reduction 1.7%, 95% CI 0.5% to 3.0%) (p(interaction) = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy, the net benefit of ENOX is similar in patients who are and are not treated with clopidogrel. The totality of trial data suggest that the combination of a fibrinolytic, aspirin, clopidogrel, and ENOX offers an attractive pharmacologic reperfusion strategy in STEMI.     

Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports a prospectively planned analysis of patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the OASIS-5 (Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes) trial. BACKGROUND: In the OASIS-5 trial, fondaparinux was similar to enoxaparin for short-term efficacy, but reduced major bleeding by one-half and 30-day mortality by 17%. METHODS: The OASIS-5 trial was a double-blind, randomized comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in 20,078 patients with acute coronary syndrome. A total of 12,715 patients underwent heart catheterization during the initial hospitalization, and 6,238 patients underwent PCI. In the fondaparinux group, intravenous fondaparinux was given for PCI. In the enoxaparin group, no additional anticoagulant was given if PCI was <6 h from last subcutaneous dose, and additional intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) was given if PCI was >6 h. RESULTS: Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin reduced major bleeding by more than one-half (2.4% vs. 5.1%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, p < 0.00001) at day 9, with similar rates of ischemic events, resulting in superior net clinical benefit (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding: 8.2% vs. 10.4%, HR 0.78, p = 0.004). Fondaparinux reduced major bleeding 48 h after PCI irrespective of whether PCI was performed <6 h of the last enoxaparin dose (1.6% vs. 3.8%, HR 0.42, p < 0.0001) or >6 h when UFH was given (1.3% vs. 3.4%, HR 0.39, p < 0.0001). Catheter thrombus was more common in patients receiving fondaparinux (0.9%) than enoxaparin alone (0.4%), but was largely prevented by using UFH at the time of PCI, without any increase in bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Upstream therapy with fondaparinux compared with upstream enoxaparin substantially reduces major bleeding while maintaining efficacy, resulting in superior net clinical benefit. The use of standard UFH in place of fondaparinux at the time of PCI seems to prevent angiographic complications, including catheter thrombus, without compromising the benefits of upstream fondaparinux.     

Immediate protamine administration and sheath removal following percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective study of 429 patients.

We tested the approach of reversing anticoagulation following PCI and immediate sheath removal in 429 consecutive patients. On completion of the PCI, protamine was administered, and the vascular sheath was immediately removed. Stents were used in 364 patients (85%) and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 52 patients (12%). Time to achieve hemostasis was 30 +/- 17 min. Minor groin bleeding occurred in six patients. One patient required repair of femoral pseudoaneurysm. Mean creatine kinase at 8 and 16 hr post-PCI were 129 +/- 35 and 145 +/- 32 units, respectively. Creatine kinase rose to > 3 times normal in 12 out of 350 patients (3.4%). Prior to 48 hr, eight patients (1.9%) required emergency PCI or coronary bypass surgery. Follow-up at 30 days observed no deaths and only three target vessel revascularizations (0.7%). In conclusion, immediate reversal of anticoagulation and sheath removal after PCI is safe and feasible.     

Safety and effectiveness of enoxaparin following fibrinolytic therapy: Results of the Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)-QUEBEC registry

BACKGROUND:

Previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrated the superior efficacy of enoxaparin (ENOX) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The external validity of randomized controlled trials may be limited by selective inclusion of patients who are younger and healthier than the ‘real-life’ population.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ENOX compared with UFH in unselected STEMI patients.

METHODS:

The safety and effectiveness of ENOX and UFH were compared in STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy at 17 Quebec hospitals in 2003.

RESULTS:

A total of 498 STEMI patients received systemic anticoagulation, with ENOX and UFH administered in 114 and 384 patients, respectively. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two patient groups. The rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebral events were 11.4% in the ENOX group compared with 14.0% in the UFH group (P=0.51). In-hospital death or nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 7.9% of patients who received ENOX compared with 9.9% of patients who received UFH (P=0.52). Major bleeding occurred in 4.4% of patients who received ENOX versus 6.0% in patients who received UFH (P=0.51).

INTERPRETATION:

There was no significant difference in the rates of in-hospital adverse events in the ENOX group compared with the UFH group, when used in the real-life context. Larger observational studies may further confirm the safety, effectiveness and optimal duration of the administration of ENOX in unselected STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis.     

Safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous enoxaparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy during PCI

The use of intravenous enoxaparin, a glyco-protein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to be safe and to possibly reduce in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events(MACE). NICE-4, a recent PCI observational study, evaluated a reduced dose of intravenous (IV) enoxaparin (0.75 mg/kg) with abciximab. However, prior PCI studies evaluating IV enoxaparin have not used percutaneous closure devices. The purpose of this study was to observe the safety and efficacy of a lower dose of IV enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg) in conjunction with any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The Angio-Seal femoral closure device was also employed as part of the treatment strategy. We administered 0.5 mg/kg IV enoxaparin and a GP IIIb/IIIa inhibitor to 75 eligible PCI patients. None received anticoagulation 24 hours prior to PCI; all received pre-procedural aspirin, post-procedural deployment of the Angio-Seal and clopidogrel therapy, and were discharged home within 36 hours. TIMI minor bleeding was 1.3%; there were no TIMI major bleeding events or major adverse cardiac events during in-hospital stay or at 30-day follow-up. Our small observational study shows that IV enoxaparin is safe and efficacious during PCI when given at a dose 33% lower than previously reported in conjunction with any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and Angio-Seal. However, large, randomized PCI trials are needed to confirm the clinical efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of lower doses of enoxaparin with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices.