Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Bowel function varies markedly among patients with colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Little is known of the mechanisms controlling fecal continence and frequency of defecation after operation. The aim of this study was to determine which features of the anal sphincter and neorectum accounted for the variation in clinical outcome. Twenty patients were studied 4 to 35 months after operation and compared to 12 healthy volunteers. Despite several patients exhibiting impaired fecal continence, anal sphincteric length and pressures and ileal pouch capacity and distensibility were similar in patients and controls. Patients with poor results, however, had rapid filling of their ileal pouch, which resulted in early onset of high amplitude propulsive pressure waves in the pouch. As these waves became more frequent, defecation resulted. Patients with poor results also were not able to empty adequately their pouch. The poorer the completeness of evacuation, the more frequent the defecation (r = 0.62, p less than 0.01). The authors conclude that rapid pouch filling and impaired pouch evacuation can lead to increased stool frequency in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.     

Motor function of the ileal J pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The motor function of the ileal J pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has a key role in the clinical outcome. The pouch forms a neorectum that aids in the maintenance of reasonable continence. The maximum capacity of the pouch (mean, 320 ml) is similar to that of the healthy rectum (330 ml). The pouch accommodates to distension, keeping intrapouch pressure low as the pouch gradually fills with stool. The change in pouch volume with each change in pressure (15 ml/mm Hg) approximates that of the healthy rectum (19 ml/mm Hg). When a threshold volume of about 150 ml is reached, large-amplitude (>25 mm Hg), prolonged (40–60 sec), propulsive waves appear in the pouch. They initiate the call to stool. With continuing distention of the pouch to its functional capacity, which is about 200 ml, reflux of stool into the distal ileum begins, the large pressure waves become more frequent, and the urge for defecation more intense. Defecation is voluntary, spontaneous, and rapid (11 ml/sec), with the pouch and distal ileum emptying concurrently. About 60% of the pouch content, a volume of about 100 ml of stool, is discharged with each bowel movement. The greater the threshold volume and the more complete the evacuation, the fewer the bowel movements per day. After evacuation, the large pressure waves subside, and the next cycle of pouch filling and emptying begins.

---

Resumen La función motora de la bolsa ileal en J después de la anastosis entre la bolsa ileal y el ano juega un papel crítico en cuanto al resultado clínico. La bolsa constituye un neorrecto que ayuda a mantener una razonable continencia. La capacidad máxima de la bolsa (promedio de 320 ml) es similar a la del recto (330 ml). La bolsa se acomoda a la distensión y mantiene una baja presión intraluminal en la medida que se llena con materia fecal. La variación en el volumen con los cambios de presión (15 ml/mm Hg) se aproxima a la del recto normal (19 ml/mm Hg). Cuando se llega al umbral de volumen de aproximadamente 150 ml aparecen ondas propulsivas prolongadas (40–60 sec) y de gran amplitud (>25 mm Hg), las cuales inician el deseo de defecar con la continuada distensión de la bolsa hasta su maxima capacidad funcional, que es aproximadamente de 200 ml, comienza el reflujo de materia fecal hacia el îleo distal, las ondas de gran amplitud de presión se hacen más frecuentes, y la urgencia por defecar más intensa. La defacación es voluntaria, espontánea, y rápida (11 ml/sec), con vaciamiento concomitante de la bolsa y del íleo distal. Cerca del 60% del contenido de la bolsa, un volumen aproximado de 100 ml de materia fecal, es excretado en cada movimiento intestinal. Entre mayor el umbral de volumen y más completa la evacuación, es menor el numéro de defecaciones diarias. Después de la evacuación ceden las amplias ondas de presión y comienza el ciclo siguiente de llenado y vaciamiento de la bolsa.

---

Résumé La fonction motrice de la poche iléale en J après anastomose iléo-anale joue un rôle essentiel dans les suites cliniques opératoires. La poche forme un néo-rectum qui joue un rôle indiscutable dans le maintien de la continence. La capactié maximum du réservoir qu'elle constitue (moyenne, 320 ml) est identique à celle du rectum (330 ml). La poche s'adapte à la distension, la pression à son niveau restant basse alors que le réservoir se remplit de matières fécales. La modification du volume de la poche lors de chaque modification de pression (15 ml/mm Mg) est proche de celle du rectum normal (19 ml/mm Mg). Quand un volume d'environ 150 ml est atteint des contractions de large amplitude (>25 mm Mg) et prolongée (40–60 sec) apparaissent au niveau du réservoir. Elles incitent à aller à la selle. Lorsque la distension continue de la poche atteint sa capacité fonctionnelle, qui se situe aux environs de 200 ml, le reflux du bol fécal dans l'iléon distal commence, les contractions fortes deviennent plus fréquentes, et le besoin de défécation devient plus intense. La défécation est volontaire, spontanée et rapide (11 ml/sec), la poche et l'iléon distal s'évacuant concurremment. Environ 60% du contenu du réservoir iléal, soit 100 ml de matières, sont évacués à chaque selle. Plus élevé est le volume—seuil plus complète est l'évacuation et moins fréquentes sont les selles quotidiennes. Après la selle les contractions fortes se calment et le nouveau cycle de réplétion et d'évacuation recommence.

---

---

Supported in part by USHPS NIH grants AM 18278, AM 34988, RR 585, TWO 3501, and the Mayo Foundation.     

Gastrointestinal transit after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or ileostomy

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis increases the frequency of stooling, perhaps due in part to the loss of an ileocecal or colonic braking effect on gastrointestinal transit. To assess whether colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or with ileostomy accelerates gastrointestinal transit, we studied 16 IPAA patients (mean +/- SEM stool frequency, 8 +/- 1 stools/day), 5 patients after colectomy and Brooke ileostomy, and 8 healthy, unoperated controls (1 +/- 1 stools/day). Gastric emptying of liquids and small bowel transit of chyme were measured concurrently with a dual isotope technique. Gastric emptying was similar among all groups. In contrast, postprandial small bowel transit of the head of a duodenal marker was slowed, not accelerated, in IPAA patients (178 +/- 26 min) compared to Brooke subjects (80 +/- 32 min, P less than 0.05) and controls (75 +/- 15 min, P less than 0.01). Maximal filling of both the ileal pouch (341 +/- 19 min) and the ileostomy bag (348 +/- 12 min) occurred later than filling of the colon in controls (243 +/- 32 min, P less than 0.01). Overall stool frequency did not correlate with small bowel transit in the ileoanal patients, but the two ileoanal subjects with greatest stool frequency (11 and 18 stools/day) had the earliest arrival of marker at the pouch. In conclusion, removal of the colon markedly slowed small bowel transit in most patients, although it did not alter gastric emptying of liquids. Creation of an ileal pouch and ileoanal anastomosis further slowed transit of the head of the meal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of ileal pouch capacity and anal sphincteric function on the clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

This study was designed to determine the influence of ileal pouch capacity and anal sphincteric function on the clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A total of 24 patients who had undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (J pouch) for ulcerative colitis were studied. The 24-hour stool frequency was found to be inversely correlated with the sensitivity threshold volume (STV), maximal tolerance volume (MTV), and distensibility, but was independent of the maximal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure. Patients experiencing nocturnal fecal incontinence had maximal resting pressures that were significantly lower than those of nocturnally continent patients. Among the patients with fecal incontinence, those with frequent soiling had lower resting pressures, STV, and distensibility than the patients with intermittent spotting. In addition, the STV in patients needing nocturnal evacuation were lower than those of patients who did not evacuate after falling asleep. The conclusions are as follows. Both stool frequency and the need for nocturnal pouch evacuation correlated directly with pouch volume. Anal incontinence was more common in patients with low internal sphincteric function. In addition, frequent and gross nocturnal incontinent patients demonstrate a worse function in both the anal sphincter and reservoir than those with intermittent spotting.     

Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Fourteen patients with ulcerative colitis underwent formation of an S ileal pouch and construction of a stapled pouch-anal anastomosis by a modified technique, which eliminated the use of purse-string sutures. Eleven have had their covering ileostomies closed. Anal manometry performed before and a median of 9 months after ileostomy closure showed significant impairment of internal anal sphincter function. Night evacuation was significantly reduced in the stapled group compared with a similar group of patients who had undergone S ileal pouch formation, mucosal proctectomy and manual transanal anastomosis, but this was the only parameter of function to show a difference. A stapled pouch-anal anastomosis may be superior to the conventional procedure but it still may lead to internal anal sphincter damage which cannot be due to mucosectomy or prolonged anal retraction.     

Previous abdominal colectomy affects functional results after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

We assessed the effect of previous abdominal colectomy on functional results after ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis. Twenty-five patients with colectomy prior to IPAA were compared with 22 patients who underwent noncolonic abdominal operations prior to IPAA. No differences were observed in pre- or postoperative resting anal sphincter pressure, squeeze pressure, or rectal inhibitory reflex. Previous colectomy was associated with a greater incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction. Mean ± SEM daily stool frequency at 1 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively, was 8.9±0.8 and 5.7±0.3 for patients who had undergone previous colectomy, and 8.2±0.7 and 6.0±0.5 for the no previous colectomy group (p=not significant). At the same postoperative intervals, nocturnal stool frequency was 1.9±0.3 and 1.1±0.2 for the colectomy group and 1.5±0.3 and 0.6±0.1 for the no colectomy group (p=0.05 at 1 year). More patients in the previous colectomy group had greater than or equal to 1 nocturnal stool after 1 year (71% versus 33%,p=0.03). Although pouch capacity at 1 year was not different in the 2 groups, pouch capacity was directly related to stool frequency in the no colectomy group (r²=0.48,p=0.01), but not in the previous colectomy group (r²= 0.08,p=not significant). We conclude that previous abdominal colectomy may be associated with a higher overall incidence of small bowel obstruction. Moreover, previous colectomy is a determinant of postoperative nocturnal stool frequency after IPAA, most likely due to altered ileal pouch function. When possible, single-stage colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should be performed in patients requiring colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

---

Resumen Hemos valorado el efecto de una colectomía abdominal previa sobre los resultados funcionales después de anastomosis ileoanal de bolsa en J (AIAB) en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa. Veinticinco pacientes con colectomía previa a la AIAB fueron comparados con 22 pacientes sometidos a operaciones abdominales no colónicas antes de la AIAB. No se hallaron diferencias en cuanto a la presión en reposo del esfínter anal (preoperatoria o postoperatoria), a la presión de compresión, o al reflejo rectal inhibitorio. La colectomía previa apareció asociada con una mayor incidencia de obstrucción del intestino delgado. La frecuencia de defecación diaria a 1 y a 12 meses postoperatorios, respectivamente, fue 8.9±0.8 y 5.7±0.3 para los pacientes que habían sido sometidos a colectomía previa, y 8.2 ±0.7 y 6.0±0.5 para el grupo sin colectomía previa (p=NS). En los mismos períodos postoperatorios la frecuencia de defecación nocturna fue 1.9±0.3 y 1.1±0.2 para el grupo con colectomía previa y 1.5±0.3 y 0.6 ±0.1 para el grupo sin colectomía (p=0.05 a 1 año). Más pacientes en el grupo de colectomía previa presentó más de una o una deposición nocturna después de un año (71% versus 33%, p=0.03). Aunque la capacidad de la boisa a un ano no apareció diferente en los 2 grupos, la capacidad de la bolsa apareció directamente relacionada con la frecuencia de la deposición en el grupo sin colectomía (r²=0.48,p=0.01), pero no en el grupo con colectomía previa (r²=0.08,p=NS). Nuestra conclusión es que una colectomía abdominal previa puede estar asociada con una mayor incidencia de obstrucción del intestino delgado. Además, la colectomía previa aparece como un factor determinante de la frecuencia de defecación nocturna después de AIAB, muy probablemente por alteración de la función de la bolsa ileal. En cuanto sea posible, se debe realizar la colectomía, proctectomía mucosal, y anastomosis ileal endorrectal en una sola etapa en los pacientes que requieran colectomía por colitis ulcerativa.

---

Résumé Nous avons chercher à savoir si le fait d'avoir déjà effectué une colectomie retentissait sur les résultats de fonctionnement de l'anastomose iléo-anale avec réservoir en J (AIAR) chez le patient avec rectocolite hémorragique. Vingt cinq patients ayant eu une colectomie avant d'être opérés de leur AIAR ont été comparés à 22 patients ayant une intervention abdominale sans colectomie avant d'être opérés de leur AIAR. Aucune différence dans la pression sphinctérienne au repos pré ou post-opératoire, dans la pression de contraction ou dans le réflexe inhibiteur rectal n'a été observée. La colectomie préalable était associée à une incidence élevée d'occlusion intestinale post-opératoire. Le nombre de selles à 1 et à 12 mois post-opératoires était de 8.9±0.8 et 5.7±0.3, respectivement, chez le patient sans chirurgie colique antérieure (NS). Aux mêmes intervalles, la fréquence de selles nocturnes était de 1.9 ±0.3 et de 1.1±0.2 pour le groupe à colectomie préalable et de 1.5±0.3 et 0.6±0.1 pour le groupe sans chirurgie colique préalable (p=0.05 à un an). Dans le groupe à colectomie préalable, il y avait plus de patients qui avaient une ou plusieurs selles nocturnes après la première année (71% versus 33%;p= 0.03). Bien que la capacité du réservoir ne différait pas à 1 an entre les 2 groupes, la capacité était directement en rapport avec la fréquence des selles dans le groupe sans chirurgie colique préalable (r²=0.48; p=0.01), mais sans rapport dans le groupe avec chirurgie colique préalable (r²=0.08, p=NS). Nous concluons que la colectomie préalable est asscoiée à une incidence d'occlusion post-opératoire supérieure. De plus, la colectomie préalable est associée à une fréquence plus élevée de selles nocturnes après AIAR, probablement liée à un dysfonctionnement du réservoir. Lorsque la colectomie totale avec mucosectomie rectale, avec anastomose iléo-anale et réservoir est indiquée chez le patient ayant une rectocolite hémorragique, il vaut mieux la faire en un seul temps.

---

---

Presented at the Société Internationale de Chirurgie, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September, 1989.     

Stricture and pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a surgical procedure used for the treatment of people with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The surgery is intended to preserve anal sphincter function, but it carries a risk for certain complications, including pouchitis and anastomotic stricture. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical manifestations, causes, and treatment of anastomotic stricture and pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.     

Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Comparison of performance status.

Although the clinical results of Brooke ileostomy are good, patients are permanently incontinent of stool and gas. Alternative operations designed to restore enteric continence, such as ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, must not only be as safe and effective as Brooke ileostomy, but should provide an improved quality of life in order to establish long-term acceptability. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has been performed safely and good functional results have been reported. The quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, however, has not been documented. Two hundred ninety-eight ileal pouch patients and 406 Brooke ileostomy patients who had the operations performed for chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis formed the basis of the study. After adjusting for age, diagnosis, and reoperation rate, logistic regression analysis of performance scores in seven different categories was used to discriminate between operations. Median follow-up was longer in Brooke ileostomy patients than in ileal pouch patients (104 months vs. 47 months, respectively), and Brooke ileostomy patients were slightly older (38 years vs. 32 years). A great majority of patients in each group were satisfied (93% Brooke ileostomy; 95% ileal pouch-anal anastomosis). Thirty-nine per cent of Brooke ileostomy patients, however, desired a change in the type of ileostomy they had. At 47 months, ileal pouch patients had a median of 5 stools per day and 1 at night, 77% did not experience any daytime incontinence, while 22% reported occasional spotting. In each performance category, the performance score discriminated between operations, with the probability of having had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis operation increasing with improvement in performance scores (p less than 0.05). We concluded that after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, patients experienced significant advantages in performing daily activities compared to patients with Brooke ileostomy and thus may experience a better quality of life. These results help further to establish ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as a safe, attractive, and valid alternative to Brooke ileostomy.     

Long-term functional results and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and cholecystectomy

Among 971 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis who underwent ilealpouch anal anastomosis during an 8-year period from January, 1982 to December 1989, 30 patients were randomly selected from each year (total = 240 patients) for an assessment of their long-term functional results and quality of life as of 1990. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy during each of the same years served as controls (20 patients/year, total = 160 patients). All 400 patients completed a written questionnaire that measured bowel habits, overall quality of life, general health, and performance in sports/recreation, travel, sex life, family relationship, occupational work, social activities, and household activities. Ileo-anal patients had more frequent stools (median, 6 stools/day) and more fecal spotting (68% of patients had episodes) than cholecystectomy patients (median, 1 stool/day, 13% had episodes,p<0.05). In spite of the altered bowel habits, 90% of ileo-anal patients had an excellent overall quality of life, 76% enjoyed good health, and 91% had good performance scores in the areas examined. In fact, quality of life and performance were similar among ileo-anal patients and cholecystectomy patients. Moreover, quality of life and bowel habits remained steady in both groups of patients during the 8-year follow-up. In conclusion, functional results were satisfactory and quality of life was excellent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; neither deteriorated as patients aged over an 8-year period after operation.

---

Resumen Se conformó al azar un grupo de 240 pacientes, seleccionando anualmente 30 entre un total de 971 pacientes con colitis ulcerativa crónica que fueron sometidos a resección y recostrucción con anastomosis ileo-bolsa anal en un período de ocho años entre enero de 1982 y diciembre de 1983, con el propósito de valorar los resultados a largo plazo y la calidad de vida en el año 1990. Los pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía en el mismo período sirvieron como controles (20 pacientes año, total = 160 pacientes). Todos los 400 pacientes diligenciaron un cuestionario escrito sobre hábito intestinal, la calidad global de la vida, estado general de salud, rendimiento en cuanto a deportes/recreación, viajes, vida sexual, relación familiar, trabajo ocupacional, actividades sociales y actividades domésticas. Los pacientes con la anastomosis ileoanal presentaron mayor número de defecaciones (6 diarias, medio) y más manchado fecal (68% de los pacientes presentaron tales epísodios) que los pacientes colecistectomizados (1 defecación diaria, medio; 13% presentaron tales epísodios,p<0.05). A pesar de la alteración en el hábito intestinal, el 90% de los pacientes manifestó una excelente calidad global de la vida, el 76% gozó de buena salud y el 91% tuvo un buen rendimiento en las áreas investigadas. En efecto, la calidad de la vida y el rendimiento aparecieron similares entre los pacientes ileoanales y los colecistectomizados; por lo demás, la calidad de la vida y los hábitos intestinales se mantuvieron estables en ambos grupos en el curso de los ocho años de seguimiento. En conclusión, los resultados funcionales fueron satisfactorios y la calidad de la vida fue excelente luego de una anastomosis ileo-bolsa anal, y ésto no pareció deteriorarse con el avance de la edad en el período de seguimiento de ocho años.

---

Résumé Parmi 971 patients ayant une rectocolite ulcéreuse chronique et ayant eu une anastomose iléo-anale pendant la période de 8 ans compris entre Janvier 1982 et Décembre 1989, 30 patients ont été sélectionés au hasard chaque année (n=240 patients au total) pour évaluer leur résultats fonctionnels à distance et leur qualité de vie en 1990. Des patients ayant eu une cholécystectomie pendant cette même période de temps ont servi de contrôles (n=20 patients/an pour un total de 160 patients). Les 400 patients inclus dans cette étude ont rempli un questionnaire par écrit qui comportait le nombre et le type des selles, la qualité de vie, l'état général, et l'activité (voyages, vie sexuelle, relations familiales, travail, vie sociale, et vie à la maison). Les patients ayant eu anastomose iléoanale avaient plus de selles (mediane = 6 selles/jour) et plus de pertes fécales (68% des patients avaient des taches fécales) que les patients ayant eu une cholécystectomie (médiane = 1 selle/jour et 13% de patients ayant des taches;p<0.05). Malgré des modification dans les habitudes pour aller à selle, 90% des patients ayant une anastomose iléoanale estimaient avoir une qualité de vie excellente, 76% s'estimaient en bonne santé et 91% avaient de bons scores dans les activités énumérées ci-dessus. La qualité de vie et les scores étaient identiques aux patients cholécystectomisés. La qualité de vie et les selles sont restées stables dans les deux groupes de patients. En conclusion, les résultats fonctionnels étaient satisfaisants et la qualité de vie excellente après une anastomsose iléoanale; elles ne se sont pas détérioriées pendant la période de suivi de huit ans.

     

The utility of routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal in children and adolescents following ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Introduction

Pouchograms are used to assess the integrity of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy. Its benefits have been questioned, and there are no data to support the routine use in children.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 26 patients who had an IPAA and pouchogram at our institution between 2001 and 2009. Each patient also underwent an examination under anesthesia to assess the integrity of the IPAA on the day of the ileostomy closure.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 13.8 (±0.7) years. The pouchogram was performed at a median of 6 weeks after the IPAA (range, 4-20 weeks). The findings were normal in 26 (89.7%) and demonstrated stricture in 2 (6.9%) and leak in 1 (3.4%). History was suggestive and physical examination was confirmatory in these 3 problematic cases.

Conclusions

A contrast enema is not routinely required to evaluate the integrity of the IPAA before ileostomy reversal in pediatric patients. Complications can be detected by history and rectal examination before ileostomy closure. We recommend the use of contrast enema only in symptomatic patients where a leak is suspected, thereby limiting radiation exposure and inconvenience.     

Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently an alternative to proctocolectomy and ileostomy for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis. Some studies have suggested significant anal sphincter damage after mucosal proctectomy. Our aim was to assess prospectively late sphincter function after IPAA. In 250 patients, anorectal pressures were assessed with a pneumohydraulic perfused catheter manometry system. Each patient underwent colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, ileoanal anastomosis of a 15 cm ileal J-pouch, and loop ileostomy. Eight weeks after IPAA, anal manometry was repeated, and the ileostomy was closed. Manometry was repeated at yearly intervals. A decline in resting tone of the anal sphincter occurred early after IPAA with a gradual recovery toward control. External sphincter squeeze after pressures were not affected by IPAA and steadily increased to 8 years after operation. During this time, a progressive increase in J-pouch capacity was noted, and 24-hour stool frequency declined from 7.9 +/- 0.3 stools to 6.5 +/- 0.3 stools (p less than 0.05). We conclude that mucosal proctectomy results in internal anal sphincter trauma but is associated with long-term sphincter recovery, coupled with a significant improvement in external sphincter capacity, ileal pouch volume, and stool frequency.     

Functional outcome and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in children and adults

Background: In the past, children with ulcerative colitis were treated with a total colectomy, ileostomy and mucous fistula; ileal pouch?anal anastomosis was postponed until adulthood. The aim of the present study was to assess the functional outcome and quality of life after ileal pouch?anal anastomosis and determine whether it is justified to perform the operation in children when surgery is indicated. Methods: A retrospective review of 38 medical records was carried out, of which there were 19 paediatric patients and 19 adult patients (control). A questionnaire survey was conducted. Telephone interviews were carried out for the non‐respondents. Results: Sixteen patients in the paediatric group (nine boys, mean age: 12 years) and 16 patients in the adult group (10 men, mean age: 39 years) were available for analysis. There was no operative mortality. The mean bowel frequency per week was 37 and 42. Furthermore, bowel frequency during the day was slightly lower in the paediatric group. Children had marginally better continence than adults. In the quality of life assessment, the mean utilities in the paediatric group were 0.69 and 0.84 in the preoperative and postoperative status, respectively. These were similar to those in the adult group (0.62 and 0.82). Both groups achieved significantly favourable postoperative responses in terms of ability to perform social activity, recreation and enjoying food. Conclusions: Ileal pouch?anal anastomosis in children is safe, results in good functional outcome and improves the quality of life. Hence, it is justified to perform ileal pouch?anal anastomosis as soon as surgery is indicated rather than as a delayed procedure.     

Prospective,age-related analysis of surgical results,functional outcome,and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

OBJECTIVE To evaluate how age affects functional outcome and quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA).SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Because of the limited number of older patients undergoing IPAA, it has been difficult to assess functional outcome and quality of life stratified by age.METHODS IPAA was performed in 1895 patients. Patients were stratified by age into <45 (n = 1410), 46-55 (n = 289), 56-65 (n = 154), and more than 65 years (n = 42). Outcome was assessed prospectively. Results are presented at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after surgery.RESULTS Patients were followed for 4.6 +/- 3.7 years (maximum, 17 years). Pouch failure occurred in 4.1% (pouch excision or permanent diversion). Incontinence and night time seepage were more common in older patients. There were minor differences in the quality of life, health, energy and happiness between age groups, with a slight benefit for those under 45 years. Fourteen percent or fewer patients experienced social, sexual or work restrictions. Overall, 96% of patients were happy to have undergone their surgery, and 98% recommended it to others. Although the respective figures were 89% and 96% in the over-65 age group, the difference was not significant.CONCLUSIONS These data provide a unique assessment of outcome after IPAA at multiple time points. Although functional outcome after IPAA is not as good in older patients, appropriate case selection confers acceptable function and quality of life to patients of all ages.     

Gangrenous pyoderma and enterocutaneous fistulas after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

We describe the medical-surgical management of a patient with a complex inflammatory bowel disease who developed 2 acute episodes of pyoderma gangrenosum and enterocutaneous fistulas after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. The rarity of this postsurgical complication is emphasized. A good response to topical tacrolimus was achieved in cutaneous wounds. A less favorable response to infliximab was achieved in the abdominal fistulas, requiring surgical excision of the pouch.     

Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term functional results of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) with those of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In patients with FAP, hundreds of colorectal adenomas develop, and the patient will die of colorectal cancer if left untreated. The surgeon must choose between colectomy with IRA and restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. One factor crucial to decision making is the functional outcome after either procedure. To date, studies on this issue have reported conflicting results and have been based on small series of patients. METHODS: To assess various functional variables, a questionnaire was sent to 323 patients with FAP who underwent either IRA or IPAA and who were registered at the Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors. The overall response rate was 86%; the responders comprised 161 patients who underwent IRA and 118 patients who underwent IPAA. RESULTS: Patients who underwent IRA scored significantly better for daytime and nighttime stool frequency, soiling, occasional passive incontinence, flatus and feces discrimination, stool consistency, and need for antidiarrheal medication. There was no difference with regard to perianal irritation, episodes of bowel discomfort, or dietary restrictions. The functional results according to the aggregate score of the Gastro-Intestinal Functional Outcome Scale, where the items specified above were integrated (0 indicating a poor and 100 a good overall function), were significantly better in patients with an IRA (74.5) than in patients with an IPAA (66.0) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The functional outcome after IRA is significantly better than after IPAA. On the basis of these results, IRA might still be considered in patients with a mild phenotypic expression of the disease in the rectum.     

Pediatric ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcomes and quality of life

Background/purpose

The aim of this study was to assess and correlate functional outcomes and surgical results with health-related quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in pediatric patients.

Methods

Functional outcome was determined by questionnaire and telephone interview. Surgical results were determined by retrospective chart review.

Results

Data were gathered from 26 patients (mean age at IPAA, 12 years; mean follow-up, 3.7 years). Diagnoses were ulcerative colitis in 18, indeterminate colitis in 4, and familial polyposis in 4. Indications for IPAA included intractability, medication toxicity, growth delay, and cancer prophylaxis. Short-term complications (5 patients; 19%) included partial small bowel obstruction, stomal revision, pouch abscess, and negative exploration. Long-term complications (8 patients; 31%) were chronic pouchitis and anal stricture. The average number of stools per 24 hours was 3.9. No incontinence was reported; dietary restrictions were negligible. Although there were minimal differences from population norms, parental anxiety remained high. Chronic pouchitis correlated negatively with physical summary score. Nocturnal stooling negatively affected psychosocial quality of life.

Conclusions

Pediatric IPAA resulted in excellent bowel health. Quality of life, physical function, mental health, and self-esteem were equivalent to those of healthy children. These data may help families and physicians make informed surgical decisions.     

Working capacity and resting energy expenditure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the working capacity and resting energy expenditure in patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: Of 72 patients operated on between April 1990 to September 1998, 51 were eligible and 38 participated in the study. Resting energy was assessed by indirect calorimetry, and working capacity by ergospirometry on an exercise bicycle. RESULTS: The median functional score was 2 (range 0-7). Oxygen uptake during rest was reduced for men compared with predicted values. The corresponding values for women were in keeping with predicted values. The median working capacity was 96 (range 59-102) per cent for women and 91 (range 51-113) per cent for men, compared with reference values of maximum workload based on age, height and sex. There was no correlation between functional score and any other variable measured. CONCLUSION: Patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis have normal resting energy expenditure and working capacity.     

The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), to assess the correlation between functional outcome and QOL, and to identify factors influencing functional outcome and QOL in these patients. Background IPAA is now considered the procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis. Functional outcome and QOL are important factors in evaluating operative outcome. Methods All patients with UC who had undergone IPAA at our institute during the period 1990–2001 were included. QOL and functional outcome were evaluated by mailed questionnaires. QOL was scored using the Short Form 36 (SF‐36). Global Assessment of Function Scale was used to evaluate functional outcome. Results Data were obtained in 77 of 99 patients (78%), with the median age of 38 years. Median follow up time was 4.25 years. The QOL in patients after pelvic pouch procedure was excellent, with scores equal to published norms for the Israeli general population in most scales. Functional outcome and QOL scores correlated strongly (r > 0.5; P < 0.0001) in all dimensions. Older age was associated with lower scores in both functional outcome and QOL scales (P < 0.0001). Conclusions This study demonstrates a strong association between functional outcome and QOL in patients after IPAA. These patients, however, have a QOL that is comparable with the general population. Age at time of surgery strongly influences both functional outcome and QOL. This finding has to be taken into consideration in pre‐operative counseling.     

Equivalent function,quality of life and pouch survival rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for indeterminate and ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the function, complications, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for patients with indeterminate colitis (IndC) and ulcerative colitis (UC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Reports on the outcome of IPAA for IndC have been inconclusive because of the small numbers available for analysis. Concerns about functional outcome, infectious perineal complications, pouch loss and the development of Crohn's disease remain, while there is no data on the quality of life after IPAA for IndC. METHODS: One thousand nine hundred and eleven patients undergoing IPAA for Ind and UC from 1983 to 1999 were evaluated. IndC was confirmed by repeat pathologic evaluation in 115 patients. Functional outcome and quality of life were assessed prospectively for all office visits (IndC = 230; UC = 5388) using previously reported systems. Complications were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Functional results and the incidence of anastomotic complications and major pouch fistulae were the same in UC and IndC patients. Although IndC patients were more likely to develop minor perineal fistulae, pelvic abscess, and Crohn's disease, the rate of pouch failure was 3.4%, identical to that of UC patients. There was no clinically significant difference in quality of life, or satisfaction with IPAA surgery. Patients were equally happy to recommend surgery to IndC or UC patients, but 3% fewer IndC would undergo the same surgery again for their disease. CONCLUSIONS: While functional outcome, quality of life, and pouch survival rates are equivalent after IPAA for IndC and UC, there is an increase in some complications and the late diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Over 93% of IndC patients would undergo the same procedure again, and 98% would recommend IPAA to others with IndC. Patients with IndC should not be precluded from having IPAA surgery.