Pharmacokinetic interaction between darunavir and saquinavir in HIV-negative volunteers

This was an open-label, crossover study to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between darunavir (TMC114), coadministered with low-dose ritonavir (darunavir/ritonavir), and the protease inhibitor saquinavir in HIV-negative healthy volunteers. Thirty-two volunteers were randomized into two cohorts (panel 1 and panel 2). In two separate sessions, panel 1 received 400/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir twice a day and 400/1000/100 mg darunavir/saquinavir/ritonavir twice a day; panel 2 received 1000/100 mg saquinavir/ritonavir twice a day and 400/1000/100 mg darunavir/saquinavir/ritonavir twice a day. All treatments were administered orally under fed conditions for 13 days with an additional single morning dose on day 14. Treatment sessions were separated by a washout period of at least 14 days. Twenty-six volunteers completed the study (n=14, panel 1; n=12, panel 2), whereas six discontinued as a result of adverse events. Coadministration of saquinavir with darunavir/ritonavir resulted in decreases of darunavir area under the curve and maximum and minimum plasma concentrations of 26%, 17%, and 42%, respectively, compared with administration of darunavir/ritonavir alone. Relative to treatment with saquinavir/ritonavir alone, saquinavir exposure was not significantly different with the addition of darunavir. Ritonavir area under the curve12h increased by 34% when saquinavir was added to treatment with darunavir/ritonavir. The coadministration of darunavir/saquinavir/ritonavir was generally well tolerated. Similar findings are expected with the approved 600/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir twice-a-day dose. The combination of saquinavir and darunavir/ritonavir is currently not recommended.     

The effects of food on the bioavailability of fenofibrate administered orally in healthy volunteers via sustained-release capsule

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of food on plasma concentration and bioavailability of fenofibrate administered as a sustained-release capsule. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy Korean volunteers were enrolled in a randomised, open-label, balanced, three-treatment, three-period, three-sequence, single oral dose, crossover pharmacokinetic study. A single dose of fenofibrate (250 mg sustained-release capsule) was administered on three occasions -- after overnight fasting, after consumption of a standard breakfast and after a high-fat breakfast. Serial blood samples were collected for the next 72 hours. Plasma fenofibric acid concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly affected by food intake. The high-fat breakfast affected the rate of absorption of fenofibrate more than the standard breakfast and fasted conditions. Specifically, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) and peak plasma concentration (C(max)) increased 2.45-fold and 2.89-fold, respectively, between the fasted and standard-fed conditions (p < 0.01). In addition, the high-fat meal caused 3.34-fold and 3.82-fold increases compared with the fasted condition in AUC(infinity) and C(max), respectively. A one-compartment open model with lag time successfully described the plasma concentrations of fenofibric acid. CONCLUSION: In healthy volunteers, AUC(infinity) and C(max) of fenofibrate, when administered via sustained-release capsules immediately after the consumption of food, was increased significantly from the fasting conditions (p < 0.01). The greatest AUC(infinity) and C(max) occurred when the capsules were taken after a high-fat breakfast.     

Effect of food, type of food, and time of food intake on deferasirox bioavailability: recommendations for an optimal deferasirox administration regimen

Deferasirox (ICL670) is representative of a new class of tridentate iron chelators, formulated as tablets for dispersion. Deferasirox has exhibited high potency and a clinically manageable safety profile in preclinical models and in an extensive clinical program. The effect of food and time of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of deferasirox was investigated in healthy volunteers and patients with transfusional hemosiderosis. The bioequivalence of a single oral dose of deferasirox (20 mg/kg) was assessed following administration either before a high-fat or standard breakfast or concurrent with a standard breakfast in comparison with fasted conditions in healthy volunteers. The bioavailability of deferasirox was determined following a single oral dose (20 mg/kg) under fed and fasted conditions in patients. These data show that the type of food, caloric content, and fat content of the meal influence the bioavailability of deferasirox when consumed concomitantly. In contrast, this is not the case when deferasirox is administered at least 30 minutes before a meal. In conclusion, it is recommended that deferasirox be administered at least 30 minutes prior to meals. When this is not feasible, deferasirox should be administered consistently at the same time before meals to limit the sources of variability that affect absorption.     

Darunavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics following coadministration with clarithromycin in healthy volunteers

This study investigated the steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between the HIV protease inhibitor, darunavir (TMC114), administered with low-dose ritonavir (darunavir/ritonavir), and clarithromycin in HIV-negative healthy volunteers. In a 3-way crossover study, 18 individuals received darunavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, and darunavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid plus clarithromycin 500 mg bid in 3 separate sessions for 7 days, with a washout period of at least 7 days between treatments. Pharmacokinetic assessment was performed on day 7. Safety and tolerability of the study medication were monitored throughout. Coadministration of darunavir/ritonavir with clarithromycin resulted in a reduction in darunavir maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from administration until 12 hours postdose (AUC12 h) of 17% and 13%, respectively. Ritonavir Cmax and AUC12 h were unchanged. During coadministration with darunavir/ritonavir, clarithromycin Cmax and AUC12 h increased by 26% and 57%, respectively; 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin plasma concentrations were reduced to below the lower limit of quantification (<50 ng/mL). The study medication was generally well tolerated. Based on these pharmacokinetic findings, neither clarithromycin nor darunavir/ritonavir dose adjustments are necessary when clarithromycin is coadministered with darunavir/ritonavir.     

The effect of dosing regimen on the pharmacokinetics of risedronate

AIMS: To examine the effect of timing of a risedronate dose relative to food intake on the rate and extent of risedronate absorption following single-dose, oral administration to healthy male and female volunteers. METHODS: A single-dose, randomized, parallel study design was conducted with volunteers assigned to four treatment groups (31 or 32 subjects per group, 127 subjects total). Each subject was orally administered 30 mg risedronate. Group 1 was fasted for 10 h prior to and 4 h after dosing (fasted group); Groups 2 and 3 were fasted for 10 h and were dosed 1 and 0.5 h, respectively, before a high-fat breakfast; and Group 4 was dosed 2 h after a standard dinner. Blood and urine samples were collected for 168 h after dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by simultaneous analysis of risedronate serum concentration and urinary excretion rate-time data. RESULTS: Extent of risedronate absorption (AUC and Ae ) was comparable (P=0.4) in subjects dosed 2 h after dinner and 0.5 h before breakfast; however, a significantly greater extent of absorption occurred when risedronate was given 1 or 4 h prior to a meal (1.4- to 2.3-fold greater). Administration 0.5, 1, or 4 h prior to a meal resulted in a significantly greater rate of absorption (Cmax 2.8-, 3.5-, and 4.1-fold greater, respectively) when compared with 2 h after dinner. CONCLUSIONS: The comparable extent of risedronate absorption when administered either 0.5-1 h before breakfast or 2 h after an evening meal support previous clinical studies where risedronate was found to have similar effectiveness using these dosing regimens. This flexibility in the timing of risedronate administration may provide patients an alternative means to achieve the desired efficacy while maintaining their normal daily routine.     

Effects of food type on the extent of drug-drug interactions between activated charcoal and phenobarbital in rats

Activated charcoal is known to decrease the intestinal absorption of co-administered drug by adsorption. The extent of this drug-drug interaction (DDI) is attenuated by food intake. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the effects of food type on the extent of DDI between phenobarbital and activated charcoal using a rat model. Phenobarbital was orally administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg with or without 33 mg/kg of activated charcoal under fasted or fed conditions, and the plasma concentration profile of phenobarbital was monitored. Several fed conditions, such as a standard breakfast, high-fat meal or enteral nutrient used in human studies, were examined. Under the fasted conditions, activated charcoal significantly decreased the area under the plasma concentration - time curve (AUC) of phenobarbital by 45.2%. When the standard breakfast or high-fat meal was fed, this DDI was reduced to 28.3 and 18.0%, respectively, as assessed by the reduction in the AUC. On the contrary, enteral nutrient did not significantly attenuate the DDI. In conclusion, the influence of food intake on the extent of DDI between phenobarbital and activated charcoal was found to differ among the types of food concomitantly ingested.     

The pharmacokinetics of cefixime in the fasted and fed state

Summary Twenty healthy adult volunteers received single 400 mg oral doses of cefixime in an open, randomized, crossover study, administered twice in the fasted state and twice with a standard breakfast. The study design allowed both an evaluation of a potential food effect and also an analysis of both intrasubject and intersubject variability in the fasted and fed state.There was a small but significantly longer (1 h) time to peak concentration when the drug was given with food. Peak serum concentrations, area under the curve, and 24 h urinary recovery values were unchanged in the fed and fasted states. The terminal elimination half-life of the drug given after a meal (3.6 h) was slightly longer than that observed after dosing in the fasting condition (3.5 h).The intrasubject and intersubject variabilities were less than 12% and 33% respectively, for both area under the curve and 24 h urinary recovery, and were virtually the same for the fasted and fed occasions. Therefore, the drug may be administered with or without food.     

Pharmacokinetics,food intake requirements and tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers

AIMS: This study was performed to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and short-term tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir. METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were randomized over three groups to receive a once-daily regimen of nelfinavir/ritonavir 2,000/200 mg (group 1), 2,000/400 mg (group 2) or 2,500/200 mg (group 3) with food for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters for nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were assessed on study days 15 and 16, after administration of the regimens with a full (610 kcal) or light (271 kcal) breakfast, respectively. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for eight volunteers in group 1, eight in group 2 and four in group 3. Administration of nelfinavir/ritonavir with a full breakfast resulted in geometric mean (GM) nelfinavir AUC(24h) values of 76.8, 51.3, and 61.9 h*mg/l in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. GM 24-h Cmin concentrations of nelfinavir were 0.76 mg l(-1), 0.43 mg l(-1) and 0.47 mg l(-1), respectively. Co-administration of ritonavir increased M8 concentrations more than nelfinavir concentrations, resulting in GM AUC(24h) and Cmin values for nelfinavir plus M8 that were higher than or comparable to reference values for the approved regimen of nelfinavir (1,250 mg BID without ritonavir). In the 2,000/200 mg group, seven out of eight subjects had a Cmin value of nelfinavir plus M8 above a threshold of 1.0 mg l-1. Administration of the combinations with a light breakfast resulted in significant decreases in the AUC(24h) and Cmin of nelfinavir and nelfinavir plus M8, compared with intake with a full breakfast. For the Cmin of nelfinavir plus M8, the GM ratio (light/full breakfast) was 0.76 (90% confidence interval 0.67-0.86, participants from all groups combined). Short-term tolerability was satisfactory, apart from a higher than expected incidence of mild rash (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of nelfinavir in a once-daily regimen appears feasible. A nelfinavir/ritonavir 2,000/200 mg combination appears appropriate for further evaluation. Once-daily nelfinavir/ritonavir should be taken with a meal containing at least 600 kcal.     

Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in a dual-release formulation.

The objective was to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa after administration of a new levodopa/benserazide formulation with a dual-release drug delivery profile (Madopar DR). In an open-label, two-way cross-over study, 19 healthy volunteers who had fasted overnight were randomized to receive a single oral dose of levodopa/benserazide (200/50 mg) in the absence or presence of a standardized, high-fat breakfast, administered 30 min before drug administration. The treatment periods (fasting, non-fasting) were preceded by a baseline regimen of levodopa/benserazide (100/25 mg t.i.d. for 6 or 7 days). Blood samples were taken at specific times over a 12-hour period. Plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography for pharmacokinetic evaluation. The parameter C(max) of levodopa was significantly lower and t(max) longer under postprandial conditions than under fasting conditions (mean C(max) 1.41 vs. 2.09 mg l(-1); mean t(max) 3.1 vs. 1.0 h). With food, the area under the curve (AUC) of levodopa was equivalent to that following an overnight fast. Compared with volunteers who had fasted, food did not alter t(1/2). Estimates of C(max), t(max) and AUC of 3-O-methyldopa under non-fasting conditions were not significantly different from those under fasting conditions. In conclusion, food decreases the rate of levodopa absorption, but had no effect on the systemic exposure to levodopa and the degree of 3-O-methyldopa formation. Standardization of levodopa/benserazide administration with respect to meal times is recommended.     

Food increases the bioavailability of propafenone.

The effect of food intake on the bioavailability of propafenone, a new antiarrhythmic agent, was evaluated by comparing its kinetics in 24 healthy volunteers in a fasted state and after a standard breakfast. With food, the maximum plasma drug concentration was reached earlier and was significantly increased. When data from 'slow' metabolizers were excluded, there was an average increase of 147% in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUCo) following the standard breakfast. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.946) between [(AUCo fed - AUCo fasted)/AUCo fasted] and propafenone intrinsic clearance in the fasted state. Food intake, however, does not appear to affect the bioavailability of propafenone in 'slow' metabolizers. Patients should be advised to take propafenone in a constant relationship to food to assure consistent bioavailability.     

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Darunavir

Darunavir (TMC114) is a newly developed HIV-1 protease inhibitor with potent antiviral activity against both wild-type and multidrug resistant HIV-1 strains. The drug is currently approved by the US FDA for antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients with limited therapeutic options. The approved dosage of darunavir is 600 mg in combination with ritonavir 100mg twice daily. Darunavir is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, reaching peak plasma concentrations after 2.5-4 hours. Absorption is followed by a fast distribution/elimination phase and a subsequent slower elimination phase with a terminal elimination half-life of 15 hours in the presence of low-dose ritonavir. Darunavir is approximately 95% plasma protein bound, mainly to alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein. Systemic exposure is increased by 30% when darunavir is taken with a meal. Darunavir is extensively and almost exclusively metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Coadministration with small doses of the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir results in an increase in darunavir bioavailability from 37% to 82%. Darunavir and its metabolites are mainly excreted in faeces (79.5%) and, to a lesser extent, in urine (13.9%). With regard to the necessary coadministration with low-dose ritonavir as a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, coadministration of other substrates of CYP3A4 with darunavir/ritonavir requires caution or is even contraindicated. Guidance is derived from drug-drug interaction trials and experience from comparable ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens.     

Pharmacokinetics of darunavir (TMC114) and atazanavir during coadministration in HIV-negative, healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between the protease inhibitors darunavir (DRV, TMC114) coadministered with low-dose ritonavir (darunavir/r), and atazanavir in HIV-negative, healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomised, three-period, crossover study. Darunavir/r (400/100mg twice daily), atazanavir/r (300/100mg once daily) or darunavir/r (400/100mg twice daily) plus atazanavir (300mg once daily) were administered in three separate sessions, with a washout period of at least 7 days between regimens. The follow-up lasted 30 days. Twenty-three healthy volunteers participated. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed at steady-state on day 7. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between treatments. The safety and tolerability of the study medications were monitored throughout. RESULTS: Darunavir pharmacokinetics were unaffected by atazanavir. No change in overall exposure to atazanavir was observed during coadministration with darunavir/r. However, there was a 52% increase in minimum atazanavir plasma concentration (least squares mean ratio [90% CI 0.99, 2.34]). Mean systemic exposure to ritonavir was increased by 65% and 106%, respectively, with the combination treatment compared with darunavir/r alone or atazanavir/r alone. There were no apparent differences in mean changes in lipids between the darunavir/r, atazanavir/r or darunavir/r plus atazanavir regimens. Hyperbilirubinaemia and ocular icterus were reported with atazanavir-containing regimens. CONCLUSION: Atazanavir at a dose of 300mg once daily can be coadministered with a darunavir/r twice-daily regimen without any dose adjustment if there is a clinical need to combine darunavir/r and atazanavir in HIV-1-infected patients.     

Influence of food on the bioavailability of enalapril

In a randomized, two-period crossover study in 12 normal volunteers, serum and urine concentrations of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat were determined following administration of a single 40-mg tablet of enalapril maleate administered both in the fasting state and with a standard breakfast. A 7-d interval separated the two treatment periods. Area under the serum concentration-time curves for enalaprilat and urinary recoveries for enalaprilat and total drug did not differ significantly between the fed and fasted conditions. The mean observed maximum serum concentration of enalaprilat was slightly higher for the fasting treatment, but the time to peak concentration was almost identical for the two treatments. Enalapril maleate is unlike the prototype angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril in that a standard meal does not appear to influence absorption of this new drug.     

Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and ketoconazole following co-administration in HIV-healthy volunteers

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• Ketoconazole is a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme system.
• Co-administration of ketoconazole and drugs primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme system may result in increased plasma concentrations of the drugs, which could increase or prolong both therapeutic and adverse effects.
• Therefore, unless otherwise specified, appropriate dosage adjustments may be necessary.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

• The current study was conducted to determine the extent of interaction between the potent CYP3A inhibitor, ketoconazole, and the CYP 3A substrate, darunavir (given alone and with low-dose ritonavir).
• This information provides data on the pharmacokinetic boosting ability of ketoconazole and serves as important guidance to HIV-infected patients and their treating physicians with regard to appropriate (co-)administration of darunavir/ritonavir and ketoconazole.

AIMS

To investigate the interaction between ketoconazole and darunavir (alone and in combination with low-dose ritonavir), in HIV–healthy volunteers.

Methods

Volunteers received darunavir 400 mg bid and darunavir 400 mg bid plus ketoconazole 200 mg bid, in two sessions (Panel 1), or darunavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid, ketoconazole 200 mg bid and darunavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid plus ketoconazole 200 mg bid, over three sessions (Panel 2). Treatments were administered with food for 6 days. Steady-state pharmacokinetics following the morning dose on day 7 were compared between treatments. Short-term safety and tolerability were assessed.

Results

Based on least square means ratios (90% confidence intervals),during darunavir and ketoconazole co-administration, darunavir area under the curve (AUC_12h), maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and minimum plasma concentration (C_min) increased by 155% (80, 261), 78% (28, 147) and 179% (58, 393), respectively, compared with treatment with darunavir alone. Darunavir AUC_12h, C_max and C_min increased by 42% (23, 65), 21% (4, 40) and 73% (39, 114), respectively, during darunavir/ritonavir and ketoconazole co-administration, relative to darunavir/ritonavir treatment. Ketoconazole pharmacokinetics was unchanged by co-administration with darunavir alone. Ketoconazole AUC_12h, C_max and C_min increased by 212% (165, 268), 111% (81, 144) and 868% (544, 1355), respectively, during co-administration with darunavir/ritonavir compared with ketoconazole alone.

Conclusions

The increase in darunavir exposure by ketoconazole was lower than that observed previously with ritonavir. A maximum ketoconazole dose of 200 mg day⁻¹ is recommended if used concomitantly with darunavir/ritonavir, with no dose adjustments for darunavir/ritonavir.     

The effects of once-daily saquinavir/minidose ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of methadone

Twelve methadone-maintained HIV-negative subjects were given saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/rtv) 1600 mg/100 mg once daily for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of total and unbound methadone enantiomers (R and S) were conducted before and after SQV/rtv. SQV/rtv was well tolerated, with no ACTG Grade 3-4 adverse events, no evidence of sedation, and no changes in methadone dose. For R-methadone (active isomer), C(max), AUC(0-24 h), and C(min) were unchanged, but percent unbound 4 hours after dosing was reduced by 12%. For S-methadone, no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters of total drug were seen, but unbound concentrations were reduced by 15% and 21% at 4 and 24 hours after dosing, respectively. SQV trough concentrations exceeded the anticipated EC(50) (50 ng/mL) in 10/12 subjects, persisting for at least 6 hours after the final dose in 4/6 subjects. Once-daily SQV/rtv in methadone-maintained subjects is safe and not associated with any clinically significant interaction with methadone during 14 days of concomitant administration.     

Influence of SLCO1B1 Polymorphisms on the Drug-Drug Interaction Between Darunavir/Ritonavir and Pravastatin

The authors investigated whether SLCO1B1 polymorphisms contribute to variability in pravastatin pharmacokinetics when pravastatin is administered alone versus with darunavir/ritonavir. HIV-negative healthy participants were prospectively enrolled on the basis of SLCO1B1 diplotype: group 1 (*1A/*1A, n = 9); group 2 (*1A/*1B, n = 10; or *1B/*1B, n = 2); and group 3 (*1A/*15, n = 1; *1B/*15, n = 5; or *1B/*17, n = 1). Participants received pravastatin (40 mg) daily on days 1 through 4, washout on days 5 through 11, darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg) twice daily on days 12 through 18, with pravastatin 40 mg added back on days 15 through 18. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted on day 4 (pravastatin alone) and day 18 (pravastatin + darunavir/ritonavir). Pravastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(tau)) was 21% higher during administration with darunavir/ritonavir compared with pravastatin alone; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .11). Group 3 variants had 96% higher pravastatin AUC(tau) on day 4 and 113% higher pravastatin AUC(tau) on day 18 compared with group 1. The relative change in pravastatin pharmacokinetics was largest in group 3 but did not differ significantly between diplotype groups. In sum, the influence of SLCO1B1*15 and *17 haplotypes on pravastatin pharmacokinetics was maintained in the presence of darunavir/ritonavir. Because OATP1B1 inhibition would be expected to be greater in carriers of normal or high-functioning SLCO1B1 haplotypes, these findings suggest that darunavir/ritonavir is not a potent inhibitor of OATP1B1-mediated pravastatin transport in vivo.     

Kinetics of monosodium glutamate in human volunteers under different experimental conditions

The kinetics of glutamic acid (GA) in plasma was studied in human volunteers after administration of monosodium glutamate (MSG) at different doses--43 mg/kg (3 g/70 kg) and 64 mg/kg (4.5 g/70 kg)--and in bouillon solutions of different concentrations (1.5-3.5%). MSG was administered to the subjects either during fasting or immediately after a standard meal. In the fasted subjects MSG administration caused a dose-dependent increase in plasma GA levels. In contrast, ingestion of MSG with a meal did not result in any significant increases in plasma GA levels in comparison with the wide variations observed in plasma GA after ingestion of a meal without added MSG.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction study of indinavir/ritonavir and the enteric-coated capsule formulation of didanosine in healthy volunteers

Didanosine enteric-coated should be taken on an empty stomach, but the once-daily combination of indinavir/ritonavir can be taken with food. Because these drugs are frequently included in 1 regimen, the food effects on the pharmacokinetics were evaluated. This was a randomized, 4-way crossover study of single doses of didanosine enteric-coated 400 mg and indinavir/ritonavir 1200/400 mg in 8 healthy subjects. The following regimens were given: didanosine enteric-coated 2 hours after breakfast (reference regimen A), indinavir/ritonavir with breakfast (reference regimen B), didanosine enteric-coated + indinavir/ritonavir 2 hours after breakfast (test regimen C), and didanosine enteric-coated + indinavir/ritonavir with breakfast (test regimen D). Breakfast was 550 kcal, 28% fat. Blood samples were drawn before and up to 24 hours after ingestion. Statistical comparisons of test regimens C and D with reference regimens A and B were made using the equivalence approach for indinavir and didanosine area under the curve and C(max) (0.80-1.25). Eight subjects (5 men, 3 women) were enrolled and completed the study. Indinavir area under the curves were bioequivalent in test regimens C and D compared to reference regimen B. A 14% increased C(max) was observed in test regimen C. Didanosine area under the curve in test regimen D was 4% lower and suggestive of bioequivalence compared to reference regimen A. However, test regimen C didanosine area under the curve was 23% lower and bioinequivalent compared to reference regimen A. Didanosine C(max) decreased 42% and 46% in test regimens C and D, respectively, in comparison to reference regimen A. In this study, dosing didanosine enteric-coated 400 mg once daily + indinavir/ritonavir 1200/400 mg once daily with breakfast indicated no decrease in the amount of absorption for either didanosine and indinavir and that this regimen could be administered with food.     

The influence of food on the disposition of the antiepileptic rufinamide in healthy volunteers

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the antiepileptic rufinamide was investigated in healthy volunteers. Twelve subjects were treated with single per-oral doses of 600 mg of rufinamide after overnight fasting or a fat and protein rich breakfast. Mean (±S.D.) areas under the plasma concentration–time curves (AUCs) of the unchanged compound were 57.2 (16) μg mL⁻¹ h when given to the fasted volunteers and 81.7 (22.2) μg mL⁻¹ h (p = 0.0001) when given after the breakfast. The average AUC was increased by 44% when rufinamide was given with food and the maximum concentration (C_max) by about 100%. The time at which C_max was reached (t_max) was shorter (8 h in fasted conditions and 6 h in fed after breakfast); the terminal half-life was not influenced by concomitant intake of food. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.