Prenatal HIV counseling,testing, and antiretroviral prophylaxis by obstetric and family medicine providers in Alabama

BACKGROUND: The study reported here assessed the implementation of recommendations for routine universal prenatal counseling and voluntary HIV testing among Alabama physicians who provide prenatal care and determined factors associated with noncompliance. METHODS: Voluntary, confidential mailed survey of obstetrics and family medicine practitioners. RESULTS: Of the 138 physicians who responded to a mailed survey in Alabama, 17 (12.3%) indicated that they did not offer universal HIV counseling and testing to pregnant women. Factors associated with failure to offer universal HIV counseling and testing included having more than 50% of patients refuse HIV counseling and testing when offered and never knowingly having given prenatal/perinatal care to women with HIV. Low/medium familiarity with the US Public Health Service recommendations for perinatal zidovudine use to reduce HIV transmission and physician specialty are also suggested as predictors of not offering universal testing. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well-established benefits of antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent vertical transmission of HIV, some physicians in Alabama have been slow to adopt universal testing of their pregnant patients for HIV in the prenatal period. Practitioner education is as important as patient education in eliminating pediatric HIV in the Deep South.     

Achieving universal HIV screening in prenatal care in the United States: provider persistence pays off

Routine voluntary HIV testing with the right to decline (the "opt-out" approach) is recommended for all pregnant women in the United States but not all are tested. We examined data from surveys of prenatal care providers to identify factors associated with universal testing among patients. Data are from a probability survey conducted in 1999 with prenatal care providers in four separate areas. Survey participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. We computed the percentage of providers reporting universal testing by characteristics of the provider's practice, medical specialty, how strongly they encouraged testing, perceptions of patients' risk, and whether they saw patients in public clinics. In the four locations (Brooklyn, New York; North Carolina; Connecticut; and Dade County, Florida) 95%-99% of providers reported that they routinely offered HIV testing to all pregnant women; the average percentage tested was 64%-89%. The percentage reporting that all of their patients were tested ranged from 12%-62%. The percent of providers reporting universal testing was positively associated with the degree to which testing was encouraged, particularly encouragement to women perceived to be low risk. In some areas, universal testing varied by medical profession, with obstetric physicians and residents, and nurse-midwives reporting a lower percentage of universal testing than family practice physicians and residents. To achieve the goal of routine HIV testing of all pregnant women, education and training must be delivered to all prenatal care providers. This training should emphasize the importance of routine testing. Even with the opt-out approach, many women may decline testing if their doctor does not recommend and encourage HIV testing.     

Breast cancer screening in older women: practices and barriers reported by primary care physicians

Annual mammography, in combination with clinical breast examinations, can reduce mortality from breast cancer. However, surveys of both patients and physicians suggest that mammography is underutilized. This study examined whether physicians' reported breast cancer screening practices and barriers to mammography varied with patients' age. Data from 576 primary care physicians (internal medicine, family/general practice, and obstetrics/gynecology) who participated in a mailed statewide survey were analyzed. Physicians reported screening elderly women significantly less often than younger women, regardless of family history of breast cancer. With the exception of medical specialty, physicians' demographic and practice characteristics were not associated with reported screening practices. However, physicians' knowledge and beliefs about breast cancer in older women were associated with reported screening practices. When analyzing barriers to ordering mammography, cost to the patient was viewed as a barrier for women of all ages, and pain was viewed as a greater barrier for younger women; otherwise, physicians consistently believed that their elderly patients faced considerably more barriers compared with younger women. Further investigation is required to examine why primary care physicians report age-related differences in both breast screening and barriers to mammography.     

Assessing the needs of women and clinicians for the management of menopause in an HMO

Objective: To determine the perceived needs of perimenopausal women regarding the management of menopause and the resource needs of the clinicians who treat them. Setting: A large staff and group network model health maintenance organization (HMO) in New England. Participants: A random sample of 790 perimenopausal women aged 45–60 years who were members of the HMO in 1991, and a random sample of 180 clinicians in internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology practicing in the HMO during 1991. Method: Mailed surveys of women and clinicians were designed to assess possible needs and attitudes that could lead to the improvement of care for menopausal women. The chi-square test was used to determine differences in perceived needs and satisfaction levels among women with differences in self-reported menopausal status. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and the Mann-Whitney U test were used in the clinician survey to test for differences among specialties and between genders. Results: The key findings include that: 1) most (81%) of the women wanted to see a woman clinician, 2) many (50%) were interested in a menopause support group, 3) 30% reported that their care for menopause had been fair to poor, 4) only 55% of the primary care specialists (including internal medicine and family practice) reported high confidence in their abilities to treat menopause, compared with 68% of the obstetric/gynecology clinicians, and 5) 56% of the clinicians surveyed said that support from the HMO to their practices for the treatment of menopause was fair to poor. Conclusions: There is an opportunity for better care for perimenopausal women as reported by two sources, HMO clinicians and members. To provide this care, clinicians may need explicit guidelines as well as administrative supports such as educational materials and specialty access. Since the capability for menopausal care from clinicians in obstetrics/gynecology is perceived to be higher than that from primary care clinicians, an opportunity for cross-specialty collaboration and training may exist.     

Expanding provider-initiated HIV testing at STI clinics in China

Despite expanding sexually transmitted epidemics in South China, the majority of patients presenting to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics are not routinely screened for HIV infection. Identifying barriers to offering HIV testing among STI care providers is an important public health priority. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of offering HIV testing among STI care providers in South China and reported physician barriers to offering HIV testing. More detailed operational data regarding HIV test offer frequency and barriers to testing may enhance routine HIV testing at STI clinics. A sample of 62 STI care providers within the Pearl River Delta Region of South China completed a survey including socio-demographic and training background information (including sex, age, medical education, year of terminal medical degree, and HIV-specific training), reasons for not offering HIV testing routinely, and physical examination and sexual history taking practices. Frequency of offering HIV testing was calculated based on reports from research assistants and operational data. STI care providers offered HIV testing to 3011/10,592 (28.4%) of their patients. There was substantial variability across providers in the frequency of offering testing, ranging from 3 to 100%. None of the identified physician factors were associated with offering HIV testing 100% of the time in the multivariate model. The most commonly physician reported barriers to HIV testing included: (1) low perceived prevalence of disease and (2) not recommended by current guidelines. Forty-seven providers (76%) reported asking about same sex behaviors rarely or never. Further research on HIV screening practices of STI care providers may help scale up HIV provider-initiated testing and counseling programs.     

Screening for human immunodeficiency virus infection during pregnancy

Due to the increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection during the childbearing years, voluntary screening during the prenatal period has been suggested. To study the impact of such a program in our population of pregnant women, we offered HIV testing to all prenatal patients with informed consent, beginning January 1, 1992. After 18 months (July 1993), HIV testing was offered as a component of our prenatal laboratory panel, using informed refusal. During the first screening period, there were 20 seropositive women among the 14,143 patients (1.4/1000), with 74 refusing testing. During the next 36 months (July 1993 to June 1996), 91 seropositive gravidas were identified among 31,496 parturients (2.9/1000), with only 17 refusing assessment. Free treatment with zidovudine (AZT) for both mother and baby, sponsored by the Mississippi state health department, began in January 1994. The perinatal transmission rate was 33% before AZT treatment, during our period of assessment, and was reduced to 10% during the next 30 months. Based on our data, it appears that a program of universal voluntary screening for HIV infection using informed refusal and free AZT for patients at risk for perinatal transmission results in almost 100% testing and a reduction in vertical transmission.     

Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of anal incontinence in the general population and in patients consulting gastroenterologist and gynecologist practices in the Rh?ne Alpes area. METHODS: For the first study a questionnaire was sent to a sample of 2800 people selected randomly from the electoral roll. Another study of patients selected randomly among patients attending gynecology and gastroenterology consultations was performed. A Jorge & Wexner score above or equal to 5 was used to define anal incontinence. RESULTS: For the first study, a total of 706 questionnaires was analyzed: the prevalence of anal incontinence was 5.1% [95% CI: 3.6-7.0] and the scores of each dimension of the SF-12 Health Survey were significantly lower among incontinent people than among continent people. The prevalence was significantly higher for women (7.5% [5.0-10.7]) than for men (2.4% [1.1-4.7]). Eighty-four physicians returned 835 valid questionnaires. The prevalence was 13.1% [10.1-16.6] among patients attending gastroenterology consultations and 5.0% [3.1-7.6] among those attending gynecology consultations. For 84.8% of the incontinent patients, the physician was unaware of the patient's disorder. CONCLUSION: The prevalence figures we obtained coincide with data in the literature. This disorder is common and affects the patient's quality-of-life, but remains underestimated and under-diagnosed.     

Why don't physicians test for HIV? A review of the US literature

OBJECTIVE: In its 2006 HIV testing guidelines, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine testing in all US medical settings. Given that many physicians do not routinely test for HIV, the objective of this study was to summarize our current understanding of why US physicians do not offer HIV testing. DESIGN: A comprehensive review of the published and unpublished literature on HIV testing barriers was conducted. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed using defined search terms. Other sources included Google, recent conference abstracts, and experts in the field. Studies were divided into three categories: prenatal; emergency department; and other medical settings. These categories were chosen because of differences in physician training, practice environment, and patient populations. Barriers identified in these sources were summarized separately for the three practice settings and compared. RESULTS: Forty-one barriers were identified from 17 reports. Twenty-four barriers were named in the prenatal setting, 20 in the emergency department setting, and 23 in other medical settings. Eight barriers were identified in all three categories: insufficient time; burdensome consent process; lack of knowledge/training; lack of patient acceptance; pretest counselling requirements; competing priorities; and inadequate reimbursement. CONCLUSION: US physicians experience many policy-based, logistical, and educational barriers to HIV testing. Although some barriers are exclusive to the practice setting studied, substantial overlap was found across practice settings. Some or all of these barriers must be addressed before the CDC recommendation for routine HIV testing can be realized in all US medical settings.     

Prostate cancer screening practices and beliefs

OBJECTIVE: To examine primary care physician prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and prostate cancer screening beliefs, practices, and trends over time. DESIGN: Longitudinal physician survey. SETTING: Community and academic primary care practices in a major East Coast city. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians with > or =100 patients enrolled in an HMO serving 90,000 patients were surveyed in 1993 and 1998 regarding prostate cancer screening beliefs and practices. In 1993, 176 physicians (76%) completed the survey. In 1998, 76% of the 1993 respondents responded to a second survey. Associations between and changes over time in beliefs and self-reported PSA testing were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians reported ordering PSA tests in 73% of health maintenance exams (HMEs) in 1993 and 81% of HMEs in 1998. PSA testing significantly increased between 1993 and 1998 with 43% of physicians reporting increased testing and only 13% reporting reduced testing. Between 1993 and 1998, physician attitudes favoring PSA testing increased although less than half of physicians believed that aggressive early treatment improved patient outcomes. Community versus academic practice location was also associated with PSA testing. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians reported high and increasing rates of PSA testing from 1993 to 1998 and more favorable attitudes toward PSA testing. Despite conflicting expert recommendations and a lack of consistent, high-quality supporting evidence, PSA screening appears to be increasingly considered a standard of care by practicing physicians. However, beliefs other than improved patient outcomes due to screening may be the primary drivers of increased PSA testing.     

HIV primary care by the infectious disease physician in the United States - extending the continuum of care

Models of care for people living with HIV (PLWH) have varied over time due to long term survival, development of HIV-associated non-AIDS conditions, and HIV specific primary care guidelines that differ from those of the general population. The objectives of this study are to assess how often infectious disease (ID) physicians provide primary care for PLWH, assess their practice patterns and barriers in the provision of primary care. We used a 6-item survey electronically distributed to ID physician members of Emerging Infections Network (EIN). Of the 1248 active EIN members, 644 (52%) responded to the survey. Among the 644 respondents, 431 (67%) treated PLWH. Of these 431 responders, 326 (75%) acted as their primary care physicians. Responders who reported always/mostly performing a screening assessment as recommended per guidelines were: (1) Screening specific to HIV (tuberculosis 95%, genital chlamydia/gonorrhoea 77%, hepatitis C 67%, extra genital chlamydia/gonorrhoea 47%, baseline anal PAP smear for women 36% and men 34%); (2) Primary care related screening (fasting lipids 95%, colonoscopy 95%, mammogram 90%, cervical PAP smears 88%, depression 57%, osteoporosis in postmenopausal women 55% and men >50 yrs 33%). Respondents who worked in university hospitals, had <5 years of ID experience, and those who cared for more PLWH were most likely to provide primary care to all or most of their patients. Common barriers reported include: refusal by patient (72%), non-adherence to HIV medications (43%), other health priorities (44%), time constraints during clinic visit (43%) and financial/insurance limitations (40%). Most ID physicians act as primary care providers for their HIV infected patients especially if they are recent ID graduates and work in university hospitals. Current screening rates are suboptimal. Interventions to increase screening practices and to decrease barriers are urgently needed to address the needs of the aging HIV population in the United States.     

HIV testing in a national sample of pregnant US women: who is not getting tested?

It is recommended that all pregnant women in the US receive an HIV test as early as possible during prenatal care to allow HIV-infected women to begin receiving anti-retroviral drugs when they most effectively prevent transmission. We analyzed interview data from a nationally-representative sample of pregnant women to examine the extent of HIV testing among pregnant women and the characteristics associated with testing, including access to healthcare. We used data from the combined 2001 and 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a nationally-representative telephone-based behavioral survey of adults, aggregated across all states to yield national estimates. Among 4,855 women pregnant at interview we looked at the percentages recently tested and never tested by major populations subgroups and assessed differences using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analysis. Pregnant women were tested at a much higher rate than other women of the same age - 54.1% had been tested in the past year compared with 15.4% of non-pregnant women. Categories of pregnant women that were more likely to never have been tested for HIV include those without a health plan or insurance (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.6) and those without a personal doctor (AOR: 1.7). Women with knowledge of methods to prevent perinatal HIV transmission were less likely to have never been tested (AOR: 0.8). Attaining the recommended goal of universal prenatal testing will require attention to women without personal doctors or health insurance.     

Recurrent bacterial vaginosis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal discharge in women of childbearing age. In some individuals, it recurs frequently after treatment, frustrating both the patient and the physician. Standard BV treatment—metronidazole or clindamycin, administered either intravaginally or orally—is followed by relapse in approximately 30% of cases, within one month. Our inability to prevent relapse reflects our lack of understanding of how BV originates. BV has been associated with infectious morbidity in obstetrics and gynecology. Recent studies have found it to be a risk factor for HIV spread. These findings increase the need for us to be able to control recurrent BV and reduce its prevalence in the general population.     

HIV screening among U.S. physicians, 1999-2000

In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) put forth recommendations for routine HIV screening for all individuals aged 13-64. The frequency and correlates of HIV screening among U.S. physicians in 2000 were examined to provide baseline data for evaluating the implementation of the 2006 CDC HIV testing guidelines through a survey mailed to a random sample of U.S. physicians in the American Medical Association's Masterfile. The primary outcome was self-reported HIV screening of asymptomatic male and nonpregnant female patients. A total of 4133 (adjusted completion rate of 70.2%) returned a completed survey. Overall, 1133 (28.4%) of physicians reported HIV screening. U.S. physicians, who were female, black, Hispanic, practiced in a city of more than 250,000 people, diagnosed HIV in the past 2 years, or followed up with patients to see if they notified their sexual partners, were more likely to screen their patients for HIV. Emergency medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics specialists were less likely to screen than family/general practitioners. In 2000, only a quarter of U.S. physicians reported screening their patients for HIV and these rates varied by physician characteristics and practice settings.     

Physician demographics and the risk of medical malpractice.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to clarify which, if any, physician demographic characteristics are associated with an increased rate of medical malpractice claims. METHODS: We analyzed the malpractice experience of 9,250 physicians insured for at least 2 years from 1977 to 1987 in the state of New Jersey. After adjusting for years at risk, physician claims per year was categorized into low, medium, and high. RESULTS: Male physicians were three times as likely to be in the high-claims group as female physicians, even after adjusting for other demographic variables (relative risk, 3.1; 99% confidence interval, 2.2 to 4.4). Specialty was strongly associated with claims rate, with neurosurgery, orthopedics, and obstetrics/gynecology having 7 to 12 times the number of claims per year as psychiatry, the specialty with the fewest claims. The rate of claims varied with age (p < 0.001) and peaked at approximately age 40. No association was evident between claims rate and a physician's site of training or type of degree. CONCLUSION: Male physicians are three times as likely to be in a high-claims category as female physicians. We suspect that the most likely explanation for this finding is that women interact more effectively with patients. Understanding the reasons for the variation in claim rates between physicians may lead to the development of methods to reduce the overall rate of malpractice claims.     

Testing practices and knowledge of HIV among prenatal care providers in a low seroprevalence state

As the prevalence of heterosexually transmitted HIV increases among women of childbearing age in the United States, so too does the potential for vertical transmission from mother to child. Early maternal diagnosis and appropriate management are critical to minimizing the risk of perinatal infection. We designed a study to evaluate current prenatal care provider testing practices and knowledge of HIV as it relates to pregnancy in a low seroprevalence state. A written questionnaire was mailed to 642 prenatal care providers in Kentucky. Responses were compared to a similar survey conducted in 1998 and to current federal guidelines for HIV management. Nearly all respondents reported to offer HIV testing to all prenatal patients, demonstrating a marked improvement since 1998 (p < 0.001). However, clinicians did not report adequate follow-up when testing is refused and appear to have limited knowledge of the disease as it relates to pregnancy. Only 9.3% of respondents demonstrated proficiency on two knowledge assessment questions. Those with previous experience treating prenatal patients with HIV were more likely to respond correctly (odds ratio [OR] 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-8.50). Providers with little experience treating patients with HIV may not possess the basic knowledge required to manage the disease during pregnancy. Additional educational interventions are needed in low seroprevalence areas to ensure the appropriate treatment of all HIV-positive pregnant patients and to minimize the risk of preventable perinatal transmission.     

Primary care physician office visits for depression by older Americans

BACKGROUND: Older patients mostly receive depression care from primary care physicians, but it is not known whether depression treatment is primarily received from family/general practice physicians or internal medicine physicians and whether the type of depression treatment offered varies between these types of primary care physicians. OBJECTIVE: To assess what proportion of visits for depression are to family/general practice physicians or to internal medicine physicians and whether the type of depression treatment offered varies by primary care physician specialty. DESIGN: Data from the 2000 and 2001 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, a nationally representative survey of visits to office-based practices using clustered sampling, were used. PARTICIPANTS: Office-based physician practices in the United States. RESULTS: There were an estimated 9.8 million visits made to office-based providers by older patients for depression in 2001 to 2002, of which 64% were to primary care physicians. Visits to primary care providers were evenly split between Internists and family/general practice physicians. There was no significant difference in the rate of antidepressant prescribing between visits to Internists versus family/general practice (55.9% vs 48.0%; P = .42). Mental health counseling or psychotherapy was offered more often during visits to family/general practice physicians than to Internists (39.4% vs 14.0%; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Visits for depression by elderly patients continue to take place in primary care settings to both family/general practice physicians and Internists. Interventions aimed at improving depression care in primary care should focus on both types of primary care physicians and emphasize improving rates of diagnosis and referral for counseling or psychotherapy as a viable treatment option.     

Telephone medical care of patients with HIV/AIDS

It has been reported that primary care physicians make 27% of their patient contacts by telephone. With the knowledge that more than 90% of the population has access to a telephone, it is reasonable to propose that the telephone might be employed in a more structured and organized manner for improved, cost-effective medical care. In the current study, two diverse practices (multiphysician and university-affiliated HIV/AIDS clinic, private practice specializing in HIV/AIDS care), both of which used the telephone as having a central role in patient management, were critically observed and reported through three case reports. The results indicate that personnel other than the primary physician provider, such as the triage nurse, may handle a large percentage of calls and successfully manage numerous psychologic and health care issues for the patient, referring, when necessary, appropriate medical inquiries to the physician. It is recommended that physicians take the time to construct sound protocols for clinic personnel to manage patient inquiries by telephone.     

Prenatal HIV counseling and testing in California: women's experiences and providers' practices.

Two concurrent surveys were conducted in four California counties to compare the prenatal HIV counseling and voluntary testing (C&VT) experiences of women with the self-reported practices of prenatal care providers. Participants were 850 women currently or recently receiving prenatal care and 254 providers. Although 79.9% of women reported being offered an HIV test during a prenatal visit, only 56.2% said they were told about the risks and benefits of taking an HIV test. Almost all providers (98.4%) indicated they offer an HIV test, and 76.8% reported offering counseling, to every patient. One third of the women (65.9%) knew that treatment exists for reducing the chance of prenatal transmission of HIV, and 78.7% of women said they were more likely to be tested given knowledge of such therapy. Women may have underreported prenatal C&VT because providers spend insufficient time discussing related issues or because C&VT information is not presented in a way that is relevant to all patients.     

Cardiac Risk Underestimation in Urban, Black Women

BACKGROUND: Because sexually transmitted chlamydial infections are common among young women, it is critical that providers screen and manage these infections appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To assess the Chlamydia care practices of California primary care physicians and nurse practitioners. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-report mail survey. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of primary care physicians and a convenience sample of primary care nurse practitioners in California. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey content included 5 topic areas: sexual history taking, management of cervicitis, management of a nonpregnant Chlamydia-infected patient, availability of onsite STD services, and Chlamydia screening practices and attitudes. Main outcome measure was the reported frequency of Chlamydia screening of sexually active women age 25 and younger. Respondents included 708 physicians (49% response rate) and 895 nurse practitioners (63% response rate). Nearly half of physicians (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 51%) and a majority of nurse practitioners (79%, 95% CI, 77% to 82%) reported routine Chlamydia screening of women under age 20; similar proportions reported routinely screening women aged 20 to 25 years. Independent predictors of screening among physicians were adolescent medicine specialty, female gender, practicing in a nonprivate setting, and having a higher volume of female patients. Additional findings included the overscreening of women over age 25 by nurse practitioners and the shared concern among providers that Chlamydia screening may not be reimbursed. CONCLUSIONS: The Chlamydia care practices of many California primary care providers are inconsistent with current guidelines. Targeted provider education and improved reimbursements are potential strategies for improvement.