双皮层骨种植影响牙种植体稳定性的有限元固有频率分析

目的:用有限元方法研究双皮层骨种植对牙种植体初期稳定性的影响。方法:建立牙种植体、局部下颌骨块三维有限元模型,利用ABAQUS有限元软件,分析双皮层骨种植对种植体颊舌向、轴向一阶振动固有频率的影响。结果:在模拟的3种不同骨质类型中,双皮层骨种植均可提高种植体颊舌向、轴向振动的固有频率值,但颊舌向频率的增加有限,最高增加了13. 77%,而轴向频率值最大增加了一倍以上。结论:双皮层骨种植主要增加种植体轴向稳定性,对种植体水平向稳定性的增加有限。     

密质骨厚度影响牙种植体稳定性的有限元固有频率分析

目的：用有限元方法研究密质骨厚度对牙种植体初期稳定性的影响。方法：建立牙种植体、局部下颌骨块三维有限元模型,利用ABAQUS有限元软件,分析不同密质骨厚度对种植体颊舌向、轴向一阶振动固有频率的影响。结果：随着密质骨厚度由缺如逐渐增加至3．0mm,种植体颊舌向、轴向振动的固有频率值均逐渐增加,其中颊舌向固有频率最大增幅达97．61％,而轴向固有频率最大值仅增加了11．06％。结论：种植体周密质骨厚度主要增加了种植体颊舌向稳定性,而对种植体轴向稳定性的增加有限。     

跨下牙槽神经种植相关解剖结构的影像学测量及分析研究

目的 通过锥形束CT影像数据测量下颌第二磨牙处下颌神经管位置,分析跨下牙槽神经种植术的理论植入范围,为临床上使用该方法解决下颌后牙区种植骨量不足问题提供理论依据。方法 选取80例下颌第二磨牙缺失且缺牙区垂直骨高度<9 mm的患者CBCT图像,测量该处下颌神经管到颊侧骨皮质、舌侧骨皮质、牙槽嵴顶距离,并模拟跨下牙槽神经种植,测量种植体颊舌向倾斜的角度范围。结果 下颌第二磨牙处下颌神经管到颊侧骨皮质、舌侧骨皮质、牙槽嵴顶的距离分别是(6.913±1.222)、(2.859±0.891)、(7.991±0.783)mm,下颌神经管到颊侧骨皮质距离明显大于到舌侧骨皮质距离。75%的患者可行跨下牙槽神经种植术,模拟植入种植体颊舌向倾斜最小角度为19.360°±7.086°,最大角度为39.462°±6.924°。结论 下颌第二磨牙处下颌神经管明显偏向舌侧,保障了颊侧足够的骨量,多数下颌第二磨牙处无法垂直植入短种植体的患者仍可通过跨下牙槽神经种植术植入常规长度种植体。     

圆柱状、根端带缝及膨胀式种植体在骨质疏松状态时生物力学比较的三维有限元分析

目的:比较圆柱状、根端带缝与膨胀式种植体在骨质疏松条件时功能状态下的生物力学效果。方法:分别建立包含柱状、根端带缝和膨胀式种植体的骨质疏松颌骨骨块三维有限元模型。对种植体轴向和颊舌向分别施加100 N和30 N的力,评估皮质骨和松质骨的最大应力和种植体-基台复合体的最大位移。结果:与圆柱状种植体相比,根端带缝种植体使皮质骨在轴向和颊舌向加载下应力峰值分别增加了3.62%和7.49%,膨胀式种植体则使其降低了11.3%和9.60%;对于在松质骨,带缝种植体使其应力峰值分别增加了37.8%和65.0%,而膨胀式种植体使其增加了107%和89.2%;轴向加载时带缝种植体和膨胀式种植体的种植体-基台复合体的最大位移分别增加了1.12%和减少了0.60%,在颊舌向加载时,最大位移分别增加了6.37%和7.04%。结论:在骨质疏松状态下,皮质骨的应力对种植体外形变化更敏感;膨胀式种植体表现出比圆柱状种植体和带缝种植体更好的应力分布和更低的应力值。     

种植体长度对即刻负载种植体骨界面生物力学分布的影响

目的:建立包含不同长度标准直径种植体的下颌骨三维有限元模型,分析不同长度种植体对即刻负载种植体骨界面应力应变分布的影响.方法:采用薄层CT扫描下颌骨和自主开发的USIS软件建立直径4.1mm不同长度螺纹种植体即刻负载的三维有限元模型,用ANSYS软件分析长度分别为6、8、10、12、14mm的种植体,在垂直和颊舌向45o加载150N力时种植体骨界面的von Mises应力、应变值.结果:随着种植体长度的增加,种植体骨界面的应力和应变值均呈下降趋势.种植体骨界面应力值在长度从6mm增加到8mm时下降最明显,尤其是颊舌向加载时;而种植体长度从8mm增加到10mm及从10mm增加到12mm和从12mm增加到14mm时,骨界面应力值下降并不很明显.种植体骨界面应变值也是在长度从6mm增加到8mm及8mm增加到10mm时下降最明显.结论:种植体长度的增加能降低骨界面应力和应变值,呈负相关关系;但只在长度从6mm增加到8mm时应力值降低才较明显.这提示临床上尽量不要采用长度为6mm的种植体,并应适当地选择足够长度的种植体.     

牙槽突骨挤压扩张同期种植的临床观测

目的：观测牙槽突骨挤压扩张同期种植的方法处理骨宽度不足病例的近期临床效果。方法：对56名牙槽突颊舌向骨宽度不足的患者行牙槽突骨挤压扩张同期种植的方法,植入ITI种植体61颗。术后3个月行上部冠修复。在术后即刻,术后3个月,6个月,12个月行临床检查和X线检查,观测种植体临床存活率和种植体颈部边缘骨的变化。结果：使用该方法的种植体存留率为100%,经X线检查种植体颈部边缘骨水平无明显吸收。结论：运用牙槽突骨挤压扩张同期种植的方法处理牙槽突颊舌向骨宽度不足的病例,操作简单,手术创伤小,近期可以取得较理想的临床效果,远期效果有待进一步观测。     

下颌骨各向异性材质模型对种植牙有限元分析的影响

目的 建立含螺纹种植体各向异性的完整下颌骨有限元模型,研究各向异性材质模型模拟对牙种植体有限元分析的影响.方法 采用薄层CT扫描和自主开发的软件分别建立各向异性和等效各向同性的完整下颌骨三维有限元模型,其中在后牙区植入两枚牙种植体,分析在颊舌向、斜向加载时,种植体-骨界面主应力和主应变值的变化.结果 在各向异性下颌骨模型中,除骨皮质第一最小主应力减小6.3%～7.6%和骨松质第三最小主应力减小8.7%～46.0%外,骨界面绝大多数主应力和所有主应变值均大于各向同性;骨皮质主应力增加2.1%～74.1%,主应变增加4.7%～57.3%;骨松质主应力增加10.3%～71.4%,主应变值增加19.5%～63.4%,而且骨松质应力的增加比骨皮质明显.结论 下颌骨种植牙有限元分析时,下颌骨各向异性模拟会明显影响骨界面应力和应变值,并以增加为主.在生物力学研究中应更注重下颌骨各向异性的材质力学特性.     

牙槽骨劈开术同期牙种植的临床应用

目的　评价牙槽骨劈开技术在口腔种植中应用的临床效果。方法　对116例缺牙区牙槽嵴高度大于12 mm,颊舌向厚度在3~5 mm之间的牙列缺损患者,行牙槽嵴劈开同期植入种植体治疗。共植入ITI种植体147枚,Replace种植体52枚。根据骨劈开术后间隙及唇颊侧骨壁厚度等不同情况选择植入或不植入自体骨、人工骨粉等修复手段。术后6月种植修复,定期随诊。结果　种植区软组织愈合好,无红肿,颊舌向牙槽骨较种植前明显增宽。术后除1颗种植体失败取出外,其余种植体稳固,种植修复体能正常使用。复诊时X线检查骨吸收≤1 mm。结论　骨劈开术使牙槽骨宽度在3~5 mm的病例有了一期种植的可能,是一种简单有效的增宽牙槽骨的方法。     

动态载荷下不同骨质对天然牙-种植体联合修复应力分布的影响

目的 利用有限元方法探索下颌后牙区天然牙-种植体联合修复在不同骨质内的应力分布情况,以评定出适宜行联合修复所需的骨质类型。方法 采用三维有限元分析法,分别对骨质为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ类颌骨类型中的天然牙-种植体联合修复体施加动态载荷,并对各界面所承受的Von Mises应力进行分析。结果 皮质骨所受最大Von Mises应力值从Ⅰ类骨到Ⅳ类骨逐渐增大,最大等效应力分别为89.229、91.860、125.840、158.420 MPa。松质骨所受最大Von Mises应力值从Ⅰ类骨到Ⅳ类骨均逐渐减小,最大等效应力分别为58.584、43.645、21.688、18.249 MPa。在同一类模型中,松质骨和皮质骨的最大Von Mises应力值均为舌颊向加载>颊舌向加载>垂直向加载。结论 骨质的类型对修复体周围骨的应力分布有重要的影响,Ⅰ、Ⅱ类骨较Ⅲ、Ⅳ类骨更适合行种植体-天然牙联合修复。     

天然牙-游离端种植牙联合支持固定桥的应力分布

目的 :揭示天然牙—种植体联合支持固定桥不同桥长度的设计时应力分布特点 ,为临床优化设计提供实验力学依据。方法 :采用三维有限元的方法研究三种长度桥体的天然牙—游离端种植牙联合支持固定桥的应力分布。结果 :天然牙—种植牙固定桥应力集中于基牙的颈部 ;种植体颈部骨组织的应力大于天然牙颈部骨组织的应力 ;集中垂直载荷时种植体颈部骨的应力分布较均匀 ;集中斜向载荷时种植体的颊舌侧骨组织有明显的应力集中区 ,并且桥体跨度增加 ,种植体周骨的最大应力值增加 ,天然牙周骨的应力值无显著变化。结论 :天然牙—种植体固定桥受集中斜向载荷易导致种植牙周骨损伤 ,尤其桥体长度增加时应减小侧向力并增加基牙数量     

Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution

Background: Short implants present superior failure rates for everybody. Purpose: The aim of this theoretic study was to assess to what extent implant length and bicortical anchorage affect the way stress is transferred to implant components, the implant proper, and the surrounding bone. Materials and Methods: Stress analysis was performed using finite element analysis. A three‐dimensional linear elastic model was generated. All implants modeled were of the same diameter (3.75 mm) but varied in length, at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 mm (Branemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Each implant was modeled with a titanium abutment screw and abutment, a gold cylinder and prosthetic screw, and a ceramic crown. The implants were seated in a supporting bone structure consisting of cortical and cancellous bone. An occlusal load of 100 N was applied at a 30° angle to the buccolingual plane. Results: With the selected model and bone properties, the coronal cortical anchorage was dominating, and the bone stress concentrated to that area. Conclusions: The maximum bone stress was virtually constant, independent of implant length and bicortical anchorage. The maximum implant stress, however, increased somewhat with implant length and bicortical anchorage.     

Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability: a 15-year retrospective study of Brånemark System implants

The present study evaluated implant survival and marginal bone loss in maxillae over a 15-year follow-up period as a function of either monocortical or bicortical implant anchorage. Of 207 standard Br?nemark implants (10 mm in length) followed, 110 implants were judged to be monocortically anchored and 97 as bicortically anchored. The bicortically anchored implants failed nearly 4 times more often than the monocortical ones. Implant fractures accounted for over 80% of the observed failures and were found to affect the bicortical group almost 3 times more often. As tentative explanations, induction of increased stress and bending forces resulting from possible prosthetic misfit, presence of unfavorable arch relationships, or high occlusal tables in combination with bicortically anchored implants have been suggested, all indicating an overambitious fixation of the bicortical anchorage. Total marginal bone loss was low over the 15-year period and close to identical for the 2 groups, suggesting that the mode of cortical anchorage did not have any clinically significant influence on marginal bone remodeling.     

Effects of lateral cortical anchorage on the primary stability of implants subjected to controlled loads: an in vitro study

Our aim was to evaluate the effects of lateral cortical anchorage on the primary stability of implants subjected to immediate loading. Implants were placed into bovine bones with monocortical anchorage (implant placed through the cortical bone of the crest) and bicortical anchorage (the crest cortical bone plus one cortical bone on the lateral side). Loads of 25N and 50N were applied to the implants in different cycles. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured before and after the cyclic loadings. Under 25N load there was no difference in ISQ between 1800 cyclic loading and preloading, but the values decreased significantly after 3600 cyclic loading in both groups (p<0.05). Under a 50N load the ISQ value after 1800 and 3600 cyclic loading decreased in the monocortical group (p<0.05), but there was no difference between 1800 cyclic loading and preloading in the bicortical group, and the ISQ in the bicortical group was higher than in the monocortical group after 1800 cyclic loading (p<0.05). Our results suggest that the stability of implants with bicortical anchorage decreased more slowly under higher loads.     

Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig

The reconstruction of extended maxillary and mandibular defects with prefabricated free flaps is a two stage procedure, that allows immediate function with implant supported dentures. The appropriate delay between prefabrication and reconstruction depends on the interfacial strength of the bone-implant surface. The purpose of this animal study was to evaluate the removal torque of unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, the scapula and the iliac crest. Ninety implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface were tested after healing periods of 3, 6, and 12 weeks, respectively. Removal torque values (RTV) were collected using a computerized counterclockwise torque driver. The bicortical anchored 8mm implants in the fibula revealed values of 63.73 Ncm, 91.50 Ncm, and 101.83 Ncm at 3, 6, and 12 weeks, respectively. The monocortical anchorage in the iliac crest showed values of 71.40 Ncm, 63.14 Ncm, and 61.59 Ncm with 12 mm implants at the corresponding times. The monocortical anchorage in the scapula demonstrated mean RTV of 62.28 Ncm, 97.63 Ncm, and 99.7 Ncm with 12 mm implants at 3, 6, and 12 weeks, respectively. The study showed an increase of removal torque with increasing healing time. The interfacial strength for bicortical anchored 8mm implants in the fibula was comparable to monocortical anchored 12 mm implants in the iliac crest and the scapula at the corresponding times. The resistance to shear seemed to be determined by the type of anchorage (monocortical vs. bicortical) and the length of the implant with greater amount of bone-implant interface.     

Mandibular Fracture in Conjunction with Bicortical Penetration,Using Wide‐Diameter Endosseous Dental Implants

Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient with an atrophic edentulous mandible presents a significant challenge in restoring esthetics and function. The purpose of this clinical report is to describe fracture of an atrophic edentulous mandible opposing maxillary natural dentition in association with endosseous dental implants. The patient received two wide‐diameter implants in the anterior mandible for an implant‐assisted mandibular overdenture, in which the implants penetrated the inferior border of the mandible for bicortical stabilization. Three months following implant placement surgery, the patient experienced pain, swelling, and intraoral purulent drainage around the right implant. Panoramic radiograph revealed a fracture of the mandible through the right implant site and signs of infection around the left implant. The implants were removed surgically, and open reduction and fixation of the fracture site were undertaken using a titanium bone fixation plate. This clinical report demonstrates that placement of wide‐diameter implants in conjunction with bicortical penetration in a severely atrophic edentulous mandible can risk fracture of the mandible.     

Influence of cortical bone anchorage on the primary stability of dental implants

Purpose

This retrospective chart review study assessed patient records to determine implant insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values during implant placement to evaluate the correlation with cortical bone anchorage (mono- or bicortical).

Methods

Primary stability data (IT during implant placement surgery and ISQ values immediately after implant placement) and cone beam computed tomography of 33 patients (165 implants) were assessed. Patients were divided into the following groups: G1, implants with apical cortical bone contact; G2, implants with bicortical bone contact (apical and cervical regions); and G3, implants with cervical cortical bone contact.

Results

Sixty-eight implants were excluded due to cortical bone contact on regions other than implant apical or cervical. Ninety-seven implants were therefore assessed for this study. No implant failure was found after a mean 70.42-month follow-up time. Implants with bicortical anchorage (G2) showed higher IT (64.1 Ncm) during implant placement and higher ISQ values (76) (p?<?0.05). Monocortical implants (G1, apical, and G3, cervical) showed similar IT (G1 52.3 and G3 54.3) and ISQ values (G1 71.9 and G3 73) (p?>?0.05). No correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient) was found between the two stability measurement devices for the different cortical bone anchorages that were analyzed (G1 0.190, G2 0.039, and G3 ??0.027) (p?>?0.05).

Conclusions

Insertion torque values and implant stability quotients were influenced by cortical bone contact. No significant correlation was found between IT and ISQ values—higher insertion torque values do not necessarily lead to higher implant stability quotients.

     

种植牙即刻负载与延期负载的生物力学三维有限元分析

目的比较即刻负载和延期负载对种植体骨界面生物力学分布的影响。方法采用CT扫描和自主开发的USIS软件建模,用有限元法计算分析即刻负载和延期负载时种植体骨界面的应力、应变及种植体的位移。结果即刻负载时种植体骨界面的VonMises应力稍小于延期负载,均集中于种植体颈部骨皮质,底部骨松质次之;但VonMises应变有较明显的增加,均集中于种植体底部骨松质和螺纹部位;种植体的位移较延期负载略有增大。即刻负载种植体和延期负载种植体在受到颊舌向力时,VonMises应力、应变及位移均有不同程度的增加。结论即刻负载时种植体骨界面的生物力学分布规律与延期负载时相似,受到侧向力时应力、应变增大。种植牙即刻负载技术是可行的。     

Pro/E的自适应功能在建立螺纹型牙种植体骨块三维有限元模型中的应用

目的：探讨利用Pro／E软件自适应功能建立包含不同螺纹形态、不同螺距牙种植体的下颌骨骨块的三维有限元模型的方法。为不同螺纹界面的力学分析,螺纹的优化设计提供分析平台。方法：使用pro／E软件建立包含不同螺纹形态、不同螺距的牙种植体的下颌骨骨块三维实体模型,导入ansys workbench9．0有限元分析软件中,进行单元划分、初始应力的验证分析,建立三维有限元模型。结果：螺纹角度、尺寸与设定相同,形状同真实螺纹完全一致,力学分析结果与文献报道一致。结论：探索了基于Pro／E软件自适应功能建立含有不同螺纹形态、不同螺距牙种植体的下颌骨骨块的三维有限元模型的方法,提高了建模的准确性,灵活性和速度,所建模型能够满足不同螺纹界面应力的力学分析的要求,也为螺纹的优化设计提供分析平台。