The steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine during once daily and twice daily dosing in HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and to compare the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in a dosing regimen of 400 mg once daily versus 200 mg twice daily in HIV-1-infected individuals. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, cross-over study. METHODS: Twenty HIV-1-infected individuals who already used nevirapine as part of their antiretroviral regimen were randomized to continue their current regimen (200 mg twice daily) or to switch to the alternate regimen (400 mg once daily). The steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nevirapine were assessed after 2 weeks during a 24-h period. Subsequently, patients were switched to the alternate regimen and the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine were assessed again after 2 weeks. Non-compartmental methods were used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC[24h]), and the maximal (Cmax) and minimal plasma concentration (Cmin), the time to Cmax (t(max)), the plasma elimination half-life (t1/2), the apparent oral clearance (Cl/F) and the apparent volume of distribution (V/F). Differences in these pharmacokinetic parameters for the two dosing regimens were tested using ANOVA. RESULTS: The exposure to nevirapine, as measured by the AUC[24h], was not significantly different between the 400 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily dosing regimen (P = 0.60). Furthermore, the values for t(max), t1/2 Cl/F and V/F were not significantly different between the two dosing regimens (P > or = 0.08). However, Cmax and Cmin were higher and lower, respectively, when nevirapine was used in the once daily regimen as compared with the twice daily regimen. The median values for Cmax and Cmin as measured for the once daily and twice daily regimens were 6.69 and 5.74 microg/ml, respectively (P = 0.03), and 2.88 and 3.73 microg/ml, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data show that the daily exposure to nevirapine, as measured by the plasma AUC[24h], is not different between a 400 mg once daily and a 200 mg twice daily dosing regimen. However, Cmax and Cmin are higher and lower, respectively, for the once daily regimen as compared with the twice daily regimen. The clinical implications of these differences remain to be established.     

A double-blind study of oxprenolol once and twice daily in hypertensive patients

In a randomized double-blind study of 175 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, oxprenolol hydrochloride (160-480 mg) given once daily was compared with the same drug given twice daily for efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Of these patients, 123 (58 receiving the once daily regimen and 65 receiving the twice daily regimen) were included in the analysis of efficacy. Both groups showed similar significant (p less than 0.01) reductions in mean blood pressure during the 6-week titration period and for the remainder of the trial. A comparison of mean standing diastolic blood pressure and supine systolic and diastolic blood presses showed no significant difference between groups during the fixed dosage period. The number of patients reporting adverse experiences was not significantly different for the two regimens. Plasma triglycerides increased in both groups, but there were no other laboratory abnormalities related to treatment. This study shows that oxprenolol given once daily is effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Daily blood glucose profiles of glibenclamide and gliclazide taken once or twice daily in elderly type 2 diabetic patients

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in daily blood glucose profiles between once‐ and twice‐daily regimens of a moderate daily dose of glibenclamide or gliclazide in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Daily blood glucose profile data were evaluated in 18 elderly type 2 diabetic patients treated with 80 mg/day gliclazide or 5 mg/day glibenclamide as monotherapy. The first daily blood glucose profile of the twice‐daily regimen was performed approximately 1 week before hospital discharge, and the second was performed after taking a once‐daily regimen for 4–7 days. Plasma glucose and plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) concentrations were measured daily at 12 time points: 08.00 (before breakfast); 10.00; 12.00 (before lunch); 14.00; 18.00 (before dinner); 20.00; 0.00; 02.00; 03.00; 04.00; 06.00; and 08.00 hours the next morning. Results: Daily blood glucose profiles and plasma IRI profiles did not differ between the once‐ and twice‐daily regimen groups in either the gliclazide group or the glibenclamide group. Plasma glucose values between midnight and early morning tended to be lower than the 08.00 hours plasma glucose value in the glibenclamide group, but not in the gliclazide group. Conclusion: These results suggest that the blood glucose‐lowering effects of a once‐ and twice‐daily moderate daily dose of glibenclamide or gliclazide do not differ in elderly type 2 diabetic patients. However, glibenclamide, regardless of the dosage schedule, tends to lower the plasma glucose values between midnight and early morning.     

Rapid insulin initiation in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Three insulin-initiation regimens were compared in 43 severely hyperglycemic non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients: a "standard" regimen (Lente insulin once daily), a "rapid" regimen (a mixture of regular and Lente insulins twice daily), and a "rapid/intravenous" regimen (the "rapid" regimen preceded by overnight intravenous infusion of regular insulin). The mean serum glucose level fell more rapidly in both groups receiving "rapid" regimens, reaching less than 200 mg/dl in 3.0 days with the "rapid" regimen compared with 5.9 days with the "standard" regimen (p less than 0.005). Duration of hospitalization was similarly reduced (6.4 versus 9.9 days, p less than 0.0001) as was the cost of hospitalization. In contrast to the "rapid" regimens, symptomatic hypoglycemia was common and adequate glycemic control was rare with the "standard" regimen. Thus, rapid initiation of insulin therapy with 0.5 to 0.6 units/kg per day of a mixture of regular and intermediate-acting insulins given twice daily is effective, safe, and reduces the cost of hospitalization in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who require insulin treatment.     

A randomised,multinational study with sequential therapy comparing ciprofloxacin twice daily and ofloxacin once daily

Summary In a multinational, open, randomised, controlled clinical study, 474 hospitalised patients with moderate or severe infections were treated with sequential regimens of ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 200 mg twice daily were given intravenously for at least 3 days followed by oral treatment with ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily. Overall cure rates of 86.8% (85.7%) in the ofloxacin group and 89.6% (89.5%) in the ciprofloxacin group were achieved in the intention-to-treat analysis (per protocol analysis). The overall bacteriological response rate (ofloxacin 89.5%, ciprofloxacin 89.0%) was comparable to the clinical cure rate. Both drugs were well tolerated and adverse events were rarely observed. It is concluded that ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin can be used successfully in the treatment of hospitalised patients with aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative infections. Ofloxacin has the advantage of a oncedaily regimen, compared to the twice-daily regimen with ciprofloxacin.

---

Randomisierte, multinationale Studie mit einer sequentiellen Therapie, die Ciprofloxacin zweimal täglich mit Ofloxacin einmal täglich vergleicht

Zusammenfassung In einer multinationalen, offenen, randomisierten, kontrollierten klinischen Studie wurden 474 hospitalisierte Patienten mit mittelschweren oder schweren Infektionen mit einer sequentiellen Therapie behandelt. Für mindestens 3 Tage wurde Ofloxacin 400 mg 1× täglich oder Ciprofloxacin 200 mg 2× täglich intravenös verabreicht. Anschließend wurde die Therapie oral fortgesetzt mit 400 mg Ofloxacin 1× täglich oder 500 mg Ciprofloxacin 2× täglich. Die Heilungsrate betrug 86,8% (85,7%) in der Ofloxacin- und 89,6% (89,5%) in der Ciprofloxacin-Gruppe in der intention-to-treat-Analyse (per-protocol-Analyse). Die bakteriologische Wirksamkeit (Ofloxacin 89,5%, Ciprofloxacin 89,0%) war der klinischen Heilungsrate vergleichbar. Nebenwirkungen wurden selten beobachtet, die Verträglichkeit der beiden Therapien war gut. Die Ergebnisse haben gezeigt, daß Ofloxacin und Ciprofloxacin erfolgreich in der Behandlung hospitalisierter Patienten mit grampositiven (Aerobier) und gramnegativen Infektionen eingesetzt werden kann. Ofloxacin hat den Vorteil der Einmalgabe, Ciprofloxacin muß 2× am Tag verabreicht werden.

     

A comparison of enalapril 20 mg once daily versus 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure lowering and patient compliance

OBJECTIVE: To compare enalapril 20 mg once daily with 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure reduction and patient compliance. DESIGN: Cross-over study of patients randomly assigned to a sequence of enalapril 20 mg once daily or 10 mg twice daily in three 4-week periods following a 4-week placebo run-in. SETTING: General practices in the greater Belfast and Lisburn area in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS: Twenty-five hypertensive patients who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of between 90 and 110 mm Hg after receiving placebo for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in blood pressure and estimation of patient compliance. RESULTS: Patient compliance was superior on the once daily regimen. However, the twice daily regimen was associated with a greater blood pressure reduction which almost reached statistical significance at the 5% level. CONCLUSIONS: Enalapril 20 mg should be prescribed as 10 mg twice daily and measures taken to improve patient compliance.     

Comparison of daily versus intermittent chlorambucil and prednisone therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Ninety-six patients with stage III and stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized into one of three treatment schedules. Prednisone was common to all three schedules and was given daily in an initial dosage of 0.8 mg/kg for the first 14 days, with successive halving of the daily dose on days 15 and 29 for a total 6-wk course. Prednisone was then given once a month at 0.8 mg/kg once a day for each of 7 consecutive days. Schedule I was prednisone plus chlorambucil (CLB) given as a once-a-month dose of 0.4-0.8 mg/kg; schedule II was both drugs, but the CLB was given as a daily dose of 0.08 mg/kg; schedule III was prednisone alone. Complete and partial remission (CR + PR) was 47% for schedule I, 38% for schedule II, and 11% for schedule III. Patients who responded (CR + PR) in each of the treatment schedules survived longer than the nonresponders. Complete remission was obtained in both CLB treatment schedules, but not with the prednisone alone regimen. Although overall survival was best in the intermittent CLB arm, there was no significant difference in survival time between the three treatment schedules. Toxicity was minimal in all three regimens. Augmentation of the intermittent monthly CLB, even to 1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg, was tolerated without undue marrow toxicity. About 22% of these patients either had diabetes mellitus at the time of entry on the study or manifested hyperglycemia during the course of treatment and observation.     

Pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can greatly benefit from a novel once‐daily intravenous busulfan dosing nomogram

Busulfan, a bifunctional alkylating agent, has been used as a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to derive a novel once‐daily intravenous (IV) busulfan dosing nomogram for pediatric patients undergoing HSCT using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model. A population PK analysis was performed using 2183 busulfan concentrations in 137 pediatric patients (age: 0.6‐22.2 years), who received IV busulfan once‐daily for 4 days before undergoing HSCT. Based on the final population PK model, an optimal once‐daily IV busulfan dosing nomogram was derived. The percentage of simulated patients achieving the daily target area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) by the new nomogram was compared with that by other busulfan dosing regimens including the FDA regimen, the EMA regimen, and the empirical once‐daily regimen without therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A one‐compartment open linear PK model incorporating patient's body surface area, age, dosing day, and aspartate aminotransferase as a significant covariate adequately described the concentration–time profiles of busulfan. An optimal dosing nomogram based on the PK model performed significantly better than the other dosing regimens, resulting in >60% of patients achieving the target AUC while the percentage of patients exceeding the toxic AUC level was kept <25% during the entire treatment period. A novel once‐daily busulfan dosing nomogram for pediatric patients undergoing HSCT is useful for clinicians, particularly in a setting where TDM service is not readily available or to optimize the dose on day 1.     

Antiarrhythmic significance of dosing intervals in beta receptor blocking therapy of hypertension with acebutolol

Six hypertensive patients with daily ventricular arrhythmias underwent a double-blind crossover study to examine whether a once daily regimen of beta receptor blockade was equipotent in antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic activity to a twice daily regimen. Acebutolol, a relatively cardioselective beta blocking compound with intrinsic sympathomimetic properties, was given in two regimens: 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily. Ventricular ectopic beats were analyzed both during physical exercise and with multiple 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) recordings. Serum concentrations of acebutolol and its acetyl metabolite were determined using high pressure liquid chromatography. The two regimens of acebutolol were equally potent in reducing the blood pressure and heart rate at rest and during physical exertion. The hourly heart rates during 24 hours were reduced to the same extent by both regimens. The single daily 400 mg dose did not significantly reduce the incidence of arrhythmias, whereas 200 mg twice daily evoked a significant reduction during 24 hours. Serum concentrations of acebutolol were twice as great with the twice daily regimen as with the single dose. Both treatments significantly shortened the Q-Tc interval. The data suggest that, despite apparent beta receptor blockade and good blood pressure control, beta blocking agents with a relatively short plasma half-life lose their antiarrhythmic potency when administered on a once daily basis. This property seems to be more related to the plasma concentration of the compound than to the degree of clinically assessed beta receptor blockade.     

Double blind randomised clinical trial of oral artesunate at once or twice daily dose in falciparum malaria.

A double blind randomised comparative trial of the efficacy of daily dose (200 mg as an initial dose followed by 100 mg daily for another 4 days) and twice daily dose (100 mg 12 hourly for 2 doses on the first day, followed by 50 mg 12 hourly for another 8 doses) regimens of oral artesunate at 600 mg was studied in 59 Thai patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Fifty patients had a complete 28-day follow-up period. Both regimens produced similar efficacy with no difference in adverse effects. The patients with the daily artesunate regimen had mean fever and parasite clearance times of 20 and 40 hours, respectively. The cure rate was 72%. Eight patients had recrudescence during days 15 to 28 while 8 showed P. vivax in their peripheral blood between days 12 and 21. The patients with the twice daily regimen had mean fever and parasite clearance time of 28 and 40 hours, respectively. The cure rate was 76%. Six patients had recrudescence during days 15 and 27 while 7 showed P. vivax during days 12 and 23. We suggest that the duration of the treatment may be a more important factor determining the efficacy of artesunate rather than the frequency of the doses. Further studies based on pharmacokinetics are therefore needed to improve the cure rate to 100% to prevent the spread of P. falciparum, particularly in areas where there are high numbers of multi-drug resistant strains.     

Ultrastructural changes in peripheral blood neutrophils in a patient receiving ganciclovir for CMV pneumonitis following allogenic bone marrow transplantation.

A 13-year-old splenectomized, multitransfused beta-thalassemia major, male patient received an allogenic BMT from his HLA-compatible brother after suffering grade III regimen-related pulmonary toxicity. He developed features of CMV pneumonitis with positive pp65 CMV antigenemia involving 2.5% peripheral blood neutrophils from day +46. The patient received intravenous immunoglobulin and ganciclovir 5 mg/kg intravenously twice daily. His neutrophil count was maintained above 1 x 10(9)/l by G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously as and when required. From day 7 onwards following twice daily ganciclovir his peripheral blood smear started showing isolated cytoplasmic inclusions, 1-3 per neutrophil, 3-5 mu in diameter, involving 2-3% of the neutrophils and occasional monocytes. Transmission election microscopy of peripheral blood neutrophils showed type I and type II intranuclear inclusions. These inclusions disappeared within 48 h of stopping ganciclovir. Inclusions were not seen in three patients who were given prophylactic ganciclovir 5 mg/kg once daily for 5 days every week following allogenic BMT after the same conditioning regimen. These patients were also negative for CMV antigenemia. Development of type I and type II intranuclear inclusions in blood neutrophils in patients receiving ganciclovir therapy has not been reported previously, and the striking light microscopic changes provide simple morphological evidence of the toxic effect of this drug on blood neutrophils.     

Omeprazole once or twice daily with clarithromycin and metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy for one week with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole (OCM) is accepted worldwide as a first line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. It is unclear whether omeprazole needs to be given once or twice daily. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of these regimens in a single-centre, Canadian practice. METHODS: Histologically proven H pylori-positive patients were treated for seven days with clarithromycin 250 mg bid and metronidazole 500 mg bid, and randomly allocated to omeprazole 20 mg either once or twice daily in this open, cohort study. Endoscopy with histology (two antrum and two body biopsies, Giemsa stain) was done four weeks or longer after the pills were completed to assess H pylori eradication. RESULTS: Whether omeprazole was given once or twice daily, eradication was high and the same in both arms. All-patients-treated eradication was 85% (39 of 46 in the omeprazole once daily group and 41 of 48 in the omeprazole twice daily group) and intent-to-treat eradication was 80% (39 of 49 in the omeprazole once daily group and 41 of 51 in the omeprazole twice daily group). Side effects were frequently seen, suffered by 65% to 69% of patients treated. However, these were mild and compliance was high, with 94% of patients taking all of their pills. Mild side effects included loose stools, taste disturbance, nausea, headache and upper or lower gastrointestinal gas. Only one patient (1%) from the omeprazole once daily arm stopped taking metronidazole due to excessive perspiring. CONCLUSIONS: In this community practice, OCM triple therapy was effective whether omeprazole was given once or twice daily. For those with financial constraint, omeprazole 20 mg once daily can be considered. The regimens were well tolerated without serious adverse events.     

Azithromycin vs doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis.

Azithromycin is a novel azalide macrolide active against Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum. High persistent tissue concentrations allow short courses or even single doses to be considered. Sixty-two patients were studied, 19 received azithromycin 1 g in a single dose, 22 received azithromycin 500 mg in a single dose on day 1 followed by 250 mg once daily for 2 days and 21 received doxycycline 200 mg in a loading dose followed by 100 mg every 12 h for 7 days. Efficacy of these 3 regimens was compared in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU). Clearance of C. trachomatis from post-treatment cultures was satisfactory with all regimens. Response defined as the absence of symptoms and reduction in polymorphonuclear leucocytes in a Gram stained smear of urethral secretion to less than 5 cells per hpf (x 100 objective) was statistically better for the 3 day regimen of azithromycin than for the other 2 regimens. All treatments were well tolerated. Three days or single doses of azithromycin compared to 7 days of tetracycline (or 10-14 days as is often prescribed) have obvious advantages for patient compliance.     

AMG 151 (ARRY‐403), a novel glucokinase activator,decreases fasting and postprandial glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes

Phase I studies have shown that AMG 151 activates glucokinase, a key enzyme in glucose homeostasis. The present randomized, placebo‐controlled phase IIa study evaluated the dose–effect relationship of the glucokinase activator AMG 151 relative to placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in 236 patients (33–35 patients per arm) with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Patients received oral AMG 151 at 50, 100 or 200 mg twice daily, AMG 151 at 100, 200 or 400 mg once daily or matching placebo for 28 days. A significant linear dose–effect trend was observed with the twice‐daily regimen (p = 0.004) for change in FPG to day 28. No trend was observed with the once‐daily regimen. A higher incidence of hypoglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia was observed with AMG 151 administration. AMG 151 significantly reduced FPG when administered twice daily but not when administered once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin.     

Treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia in AIDS with a four-drug oral regimen. Rifampin, ethambutol, clofazimine, and ciprofloxacin. The California Collaborative Treatment Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quantitative microbiologic response and the clinical response of patients with Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia and AIDS to an oral antimycobacterial regimen. DESIGN: A phase II, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Four university-affiliated medical centers. PATIENTS: Forty-one patients with HIV infection who had at least two consecutive blood cultures positive for M. avium complex and who had not received previous antimycobacterial therapy were enrolled in the study. Thirty-one patients were evaluable with regard to the efficacy of the oral regimen. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a combination of orally administered rifampin (600 mg), ethambutol (15 mg/kg body weight), clofazimine (100 mg once daily), and ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) for 12 weeks. Parenterally administered amikacin, 7.5 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks after the first 4 weeks of oral therapy, was used at the discretion of the individual investigator. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical symptoms, Karnofsky scores, and adverse events were monitored. Colony counts for M. avium complex were determined. MAIN RESULTS: The mean logarithmic (log) baseline colony count decreased from 2.1 to 0.7 after 4 weeks of oral therapy (P less than 0.001). Suppression of bacteremia was sustained throughout therapy. Thirteen patients (42%) became culture negative during therapy. The mean duration of treatment was 9.7 weeks. Nineteen evaluable patients (61%) completed 12 weeks of therapy. Adverse reactions to one or more agents were common. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid reduction in symptoms and bacteremia can be achieved as early as week 2 of therapy using an oral regimen of rifampin, ethambutol, clofazimine, and ciprofloxacin. Colony counts rose dramatically after therapy was discontinued, suggesting that more prolonged periods of therapy are necessary to eradicate systemic infection.     

One-week quadruple therapy is an effective salvage regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients after failure of standard triple therapy

Standard triple therapy remains an important option for eradicating Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in developing countries because of its relatively low cost. However, salvage therapies after failure of this regimen remain undefined. The authors therefore investigate the efficacy of 1-week quadruple therapy as a second-line treatment of Hp infection after failure of standard triple therapy. Seventy-eight patients who failed Hp eradication using a 2-week bismuth-based triple therapy were enrolled and received a course of 1-week quadruple therapy (lansoprazole, 30 mg twice daily; bismuth subcitrate, 120 mg four times daily; clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily; and amoxicillin, 1,000 mg twice daily) as a salvage regimen. The Hp status was reassessed 7 weeks after cessation of therapy. Among the 78 patients, Hp eradication was achieved in 65 (83%, 95% confidence interval = 75-91%) by intention-to-treat analysis. Only five (6%) patients had side effects, and all (100%) showed good drug compliance. Multivariate analysis disclosed that coffee drinking was an independent factor for treatment failure (odds ratio = 5.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-23.6, p = 0.028). The authors therefore conclude that their 1-week quadruple therapy is an effective salvage regimen for Hp infection after failure of standard triple therapy in the population examined. The benefits of this regimen include the high eradication rate, the short duration of treatment, fewer side effects, and good drug compliance. Coffee consumption possibly is an important factor in failure of the rescue regimen. The mechanisms underlying the association between coffee drinking and eradication failure require further research.     

High-dose primaquine regimens against relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria

Plasmodium vivax causes debilitating but usually non-lethal malaria in most of Asia and South America. Prevention of relapse after otherwise effective therapy for the acute attack requires a standard daily dose of primaquine administered over 14 days. This regimen has < 90% efficacy in Thailand, and is widely regarded as ineffective because of poor compliance over the relatively long duration of dosing. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of alternative primaquine dosing regimens combined with artesunate among 399 Thai patients with acute, symptomatic P. vivax malaria. Patients were randomly assigned to one of six treatment groups: all patients received artesunate, 100 mg once a day for 5 days. Groups 1-5 then received primaquine, 30 mg a day for 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14 days, respectively. Group 6 received primaquine, 30 mg twice a day for 7 days. The 28-day cure rates were 85%, 89%, 94%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. Treatment of P. vivax malaria with artesunate for 5 days followed by high-dose primaquine, 30 mg twice a day for 7 days, was highly effective, well-tolerated, and equivalent or superior to the standard regimen of primaquine therapy.     

Evaluation of a single daily dose of naproxen in osteoarthritis

A six-week double-blind randomized cross-over trial comparing the safety and efficacy of 250 mg naproxen administered twice daily and 500 mg naproxen administered as a single dose at night in osteoarthritic patients stabilized on naproxen 250 mg twice daily is reported. There was no significant difference between the two regimens. This study provides evidence that naproxen can be given to patients with osteoarthritis on a single-daily-dose regimen without any loss of anti-inflammatory/analgesic activity.     

A randomized trial of lansoprazole, amoxycillin, and clarithromycin versus lansoprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline in the retreatment of patients failing initial Helicobacter pylori therapy

BACKGROUND/AIM: 10-30% of the patients treated for Helicobacter pylori fail to clear the infection after initial therapy. Little is known as to the efficacy of retreatment regimens in these patients. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) -based triple and quadruple therapies demonstrate efficacies of 80-90% as initial therapy for H. pylori infection, but whether these regimens are as effective when used for retreatment is unknown. The efficacy of a metronidazole-containing regimen in this situation is also unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of a nonmetronidazole-containing PPI-based triple versus a PPI-based quadruple therapy containing metronidazole in patients failing previous H. pylori therapy. METHODS: 48 patients were enrolled in this study at two sites after failure of previous H. pylori therapy as determined by a positive (14)C-urea breath test. Patients were stratified by prior treatment with a metronidazole-containing regimen and were then randomized to either lansoprazole (L) 30 mg twice daily, amoxycillin (A) 1,000 mg twice daily, and clarithromycin (C) 500 mg twice daily for 14 days (LAC) or L 30 mg four times daily, bismuth subsalicylate (B) 2 tablets four times daily, metronidazole (M) 250 mg four times daily and tetracycline (T) 250 mg four times daily for 14 days (LBMT). Side effects and compliance (pill count) were assessed at the completion of therapy. A repeat (14)C-urea breath test was performed 4 or more weeks after completion of therapy, and cure was defined as a negative test result. RESULTS: 48 patients (16 males and 32 females) were enrolled in this study. 20 patients received LAC (18 prior M), and 28 received LBMT (23 prior M). Per protocol and intention-to-treat efficacies were 82% (95% CI 64-100%) and 75% (95% CI 56-94%) for LAC and 80% (96% CI 64-96%) and 71% (95% CI 54-88%) for LBMT (p = 0.85 per protocol and p = 0.78 intention to treat between LAC and LBMT), respectively. The compliance (> or =80% of pills taken) was found to be 89% in both treatment groups. Side effects were noted in 84% for LAC and in 82% for LBMT, but were mild and did not cause discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PPI-based triple and quadruple therapy with both LAC and LBMT are effective in retreating patients failing initial metronidazole-based H. pylori therapies. LAC was not statistically superior to LBMT as a 'retreatment' regimen in this clinical situation, but the small sample size and wide confidence limits do not preclude the possibility of a smaller but significant difference in efficacy between the regimens. To determine whether LAC or LBMT is as effective for retreating patients failing non-metronidazole-containing regimens requires further study.     

A 10-day levofloxacin-based therapy in patients with resistant Helicobacter pylori infection: a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Antibiotic resistance is a major issue in anti- Helicobacter pylori treatment. This study was aimed at assessing the efficacy of 2 therapies in patients with resistant H pylori infection. METHODS: Patients who had failed 1 or more eradication regimens underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 2 antral and 2 corpus biopsy specimens were taken for histology and culture. Metronidazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin resistance were determined by E-test. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 therapies: 1 group received pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, levofloxacin 250 mg, all twice daily for 10 days, and the other group was treated with omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for the first week and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, tetracycline 250 mg 4 times daily, metronidazole 500 mg twice daily, and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg twice daily for the second week. Therapeutic success was evaluated by 13C urea breath test after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 44 patients in the levofloxacin-based regimen and 46 patients in the quadruple therapy. The former was successful in 31 of 44 (70%; 95% confidence interval: 53-87) and the latter in 17 of 46 (37%; 95% confidence interval: 23-47) patients, using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (P < .001). The rates of H pylori resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin were 46%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. Resistance to both metronidazole and clarithromycin was found in 10% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy containing levofloxacin was better than quadruple therapy. The 70% success rate observed indicates that 10 days of pantoprazole, amoxicillin, and levofloxacin should be considered in patients who had failed 1 or more eradication regimens.