Manometric assessment of anorectal function

A diagnostic test is useful if it can provide information regarding the underlying pathophysiology, confirm a clinical suspicion, or guide clinical management. In a prospective study, anorectal manometry was shown not only to confirm a clinical impression, but also to provide new information that was not detected clinically. The information obtained from these studies influenced the management and outcome of patients with defecation disorders (Table 1). These findings have been confirmed further by another study that showed colorectal physiologic tests provided a definitive diagnosis in 75% of patients with constipation, 66% of patients with incontinence, and 42% of patients with intractable anorectal pain. A systematic and careful appraisal of anorectal function can provide invaluable information that can guide treatment of patients with anorectal disorders. A more uniform method of performing these tests and interpreting the results is needed to facilitate a wider use of this technology for the assessment of patients with anorectal disorders.     

Role of manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the evaluation of colorectal disorders.

OBJECTIVE: altered motility or anatomy of the rectum, anus and perineal floor may lead to symptoms which are unresponsive to routine therapeutic approaches. These disturbances usually lead to constipation, fecal incontinence, or both. Different tests and techniques for evaluating anorectal and perineal disorders, developed in the last two decades, make a better understanding of these disorders possible. This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic benefits of combining manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the assessment of patients with anorectal disorders. METHODS: twenty-five children with constipation (with or without soiling), incontinence and/or prolapse underwent anal manometry, defecography and anal endosonography. Group A consisted of 9 children with fecal incontinence, group B consisted of 10 children with constipation with soiling, and group C comprised 6 children with constipation without soiling. RESULTS: in group A resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 4 out of 9 patients, 2 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group B resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 8 out of 10 patients, 6 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group C these associations were not seen in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: barium enema is not sufficient for an accurate diagnosis of anorectal disorders. No single test is capable of revealing the type of disease. Anal manometry, defecography and endosonography are complementary procedures in the assessment of this group of disorders. This new approach will improve our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these disorders in children. However, further studies are needed to obtain conclusive evidence.     

Funktionsdiagnostik des Kolons und Anorektums

For evaluation of functional disturbances of the colon and anorectum, diagnostic methods are available for measurement of motor activity, anorectal sensory function and evacuation. Measurement of motor activity can be achieved by colon (mostly after colonoscopic cleaning) and anorectal manometry or by barostat measurements. Anorectal manometry and barostat measurements also enable investigation of the colorectal sensory function. Intraluminal transit can be assessed with scintigraphy or by ingestion of radiopaque markers. Defecography either by conventional X-ray or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to visualize defecation disorders. From a clinical point of view, functional disturbances of the colon and anorectum manifest themselves as chronic constipation, including defecation disorders and fecal incontinence. Both syndromes are characterized by a high prevalence and a severely disturbed quality of life. Diagnostic evaluation should be initiated if a trial therapy fails. Colonic transit time measurement, defecography, and anorectal manometry are indicated for evaluation of chronic constipation, while anorectal manometry, anal endoscopic ultrasound, sphincter electromyogram (EMG), and if necessary, investigation of diarrhea are required for fecal incontinence.     

Sacral reflexes

Sacral reflexes consist of motor responses in the pelvic floor and sphincter muscles evoked by stimulation of sensory receptors in pelvic skin, anus, rectum, or pelvic viscera. These responses may be elicited by physical or electrical stimuli. They have been used in research studies of the pathophysiology of pelvic floor and anorectal disorders and many have been recommended for diagnostic use. These reflexes are described and discussed in this review. More rigorous evaluation of their value in the clinical assessment and care of patients with pelvic floor and sphincter disorders is required. Currently direct comparisons of the value of particular responses are generally not available, and few of these reflexes have proven validity for use in clinical diagnosis.     

Prospective assessment of the clinical value of anorectal investigations

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anorectal physiological testing and imaging have become part of routine colorectal and gastro-enterological practice, but their clinical value is controversial. We prospectively evaluated the new diagnostic information, impact on management and prognostic information provided by anorectal testing. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients referred for testing were studied. The referring doctor's diagnosis, reason for referral, planned management and expectation of the value of investigations were recorded. Incontinent patients underwent anorectal physiological testing and endo-anal ultrasound. Patients with constipation underwent anorectal physiological testing and a study of whole-gut transit time to distinguish between slow and normal transit. Constipated patients over age 45, or those younger patients who digitated to assist defaecation, also underwent evacuation proctography to identify large rectoceles. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had faecal incontinence. Of 12 patients with suspected anterior external anal sphincter obstetric damage, all of whom were planned for surgical repair, 3 were unsuitable for repair, 3 had a normal sphincter, 2 had a weak but structurally intact sphincter, and 1 had internal anal sphincter damage only. Of 6 patients with failed anterior repair, 3 had a defect suitable for repeat repair, 2 had intact repairs and good function, and 1 had extensive damage requiring reconstructive surgery. The tests also influenced management for incontinent patients after haemorrhoidectomy surgery (n = 5), after fistula surgery (n = 5), with congenital abnormalities (n = 3), after cerebrovascular accident (n = 1) and those with no presumptive diagnosis (n = 15). Of the 20 patients referred with constipation, demonstration of a recto-anal reflex in 1 patient with a megarectum excluded the need for full-thickness biopsy. A further patient with altered electrosensation went on to have a neurological lesion defined. Definition of slow transit in some patients did not immediately affect management. New information or a change in management was provided in patients referred for pre-operative assessment (n = 13). Information was gained in only 1 of 7 patients with solitary rectal ulcer and in none of the 8 patients with anal pain. CONCLUSION: Anorectal assessment provides important diagnostic and prognostic information and directly alters management in patients with benign anorectal disorders.     

Pediatric anorectal disorders

This article reports the clinical, physiopathologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of the most common anorectal disorders in children. In particular, it focuses on the differential diagnosis between organic and functional constipation. In addition, the authors separately examine some of the clinical conditions such as atopy, neurologic diseases, and anorectal malformations, in which chronic constipation may be an important clinical manifestation.     

Clinical relevance of anorectal function investigations.

Anorectal function tests are often performed in patients with anorectal disorders. The test results have shown considerable overlap between normal controls and patients. Therefore, purely clinical indications for the individual anorectal function tests are few, and the strength of these tests lies in their combination. When the patient is not eligible for surgery or biofeedback, there is no indication for these tests.     

Manometric and clinical evaluation of patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to examine the anorectal physiological and clinical changes that occur after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Since 1998, 30 patients underwent laboratory tests of anorectal function, preoperatively and 1 month and 6 months after low anterior resection. Postoperatively all patients presented with increased bowel frequency, 60% of the patients with mild soiling and 30% with urgency for defecation. Six months after surgery there was a significant improvement of these symptoms. The anal resting pressure was significantly decreased postoperatively, while maximum squeezing pressure remained unchanged. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was absent in 80% of the patients and at 6 months after surgery it tended to recover. Rectal capacity and compliance were reduced in all patients. In the current study, the majority of patients demonstrated manometric anorectal changes and clinical anorectal function disorders during the first year after surgery. We observed that these disorders correlated with the low level of the anastomosis.     

Neurophysiological testing in anorectal disorders

Neurophysiological tests of anorectal function can provide useful information regarding the integrity of neuronal innervation, as well as neuromuscular function. This information can give insights regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to several disorders of anorectal function, particularly fecal incontinence, pelvic floor disorders and dyssynergic defecation. Currently, several tests are available for the neurophysiological evaluation of anorectal function. These tests are mostly performed on patients referred to tertiary care centers, either following negative evaluations or when there is lack of response to conventional therapy. Judicious use of these tests can reveal significant and new understanding of the underlying mechanism(s) that could pave the way for better management of these disorders. In addition, these techniques are complementary to other modalities of investigation, such as pelvic floor imaging. The most commonly performed neurophysiological tests, along with their indications and clinical utility are discussed. Several novel techniques are evolving that may reveal new information on brain–gut interactions.     

New Metrics in High-Resolution and High-Definition Anorectal Manometry

Purpose of Review

To review recently published diagnostic methods that use high-resolution (HR-) or high-definition- (HD-) anorectal manometry (ARM) techniques.

Recent Findings

The integrated pressurized volume (IPV) is a new measure based on spatiotemporal plots obtained from HR-ARM. The IPV may be clinically useful for improving the prediction of abnormal balloon expulsion test in patients with constipation and for discriminating patients with anorectal disorders from asymptomatic controls. Combination of IPV parameters was superior to conventional manometric parameters in predicting the responsiveness to biofeedback therapy. Moreover, several novel parameters including the HR-ARM resting integral, HR-ARM squeeze profile, and anorectal asymmetry index may each be useful as predictive factors for identifying patients with fecal incontinence.

Summary

HR- and HD-ARM are increasingly performed worldwide for evaluation of anorectal function. Here, we describe new metrics whose clinical significance has not been fully established. Further standardization and validation of these metrics could provide clinically important new information and could help improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of anorectal disorders.

     

Functional anorectal disorders

This report defines criteria for diagnosing functional anorectal disorders (ie, fecal incontinence, anorectal pain, and disorders of defecation). Functional fecal incontinence is defined as the uncontrolled passage of fecal material recurring for > or =3 months in an individual with a developmental age of > or =4 years that is associated with: (1) abnormal functioning of normally innervated and structurally intact muscles, and/or (2) no or minor abnormalities of sphincter structure and/or innervation insufficient to explain fecal incontinence, and/or (3) normal or disordered bowel habits (ie, fecal retention or diarrhea), and/or (4) psychological causes. However, conditions wherein structural and/or neurogenic abnormalities explain the symptom, or are part of a generalized process (eg, diabetic neuropathy) are not included within functional fecal incontinence. Functional fecal incontinence is a common, but underrecognized symptom, which is equally prevalent in men and women, and can often cause considerable distress. The clinical features are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Functional anorectal pain syndromes include proctalgia fugax (fleeting pain) and chronic proctalgia; chronic proctalgia may be subdivided into levator ani syndrome and unspecified anorectal pain, which are defined by arbitrary clinical criteria. Functional defecation disorders are characterized by 2 or more symptoms of constipation, with > or =2 of the following features during defecation: impaired evacuation, inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, and inadequate propulsive forces. Functional disorders of defecation may be amenable to pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy (such as dyssynergic defecation).     

What every gastroenterologist needs to know about common anorectal disorders

Anorectal complaints are very common and are caused by a variety of mostly benign anorectal disorders. Many anorectal conditions may be successfully treated by primary care physicians in the outpatient setting, but patients tend not to seek medical attention due to embarrassment or fear of cancer. As a result, patients frequently present with advanced disease after experiencing significant decreases in quality of life. A number of patients with anorectal complaints are referred to gastroenterologists. However, gastroenterologists＇ knowledge and experience in approaching these conditions may not be sufficient. This article can serve as a guide to gastroenterologists to recognize, evaluate, and manage medically or nonsurgically common benign anorectal disorders, and to identify when surgical referrals are most prudent. A review of the current literature is performed to evaluate comprehensive clinical pearls and management guidelines for each topic. Topics reviewed include hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal fistulas and abscesses, and pruritus ani.     

Anal manometry

Conclusions and future developments Anal manometry on its own has limited value in the diagnosis and assessment of anorectal disorders. Thus, it should be performed in combination with other tests of anorectal function including defaecography, neurophysiological techniques and endosonography to obtain a broader picture of the disorder. Patients with faecal incontinence should benefit from this approach since it may help to clarify the influence of various possible causative factors leading to the adoption of the most appropriate therapeutic approach.     

Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE: Although tests of anorectal function are useful in the assessment of defecation disorders, there is inadequate and inconsistent information regarding normative data. Also, there are discrepancies in manometric techniques and data interpretation. Our aim was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of anorectal function in healthy adults. METHODS: We used a 6-mm diameter probe containing six radially arrayed microtransducers, and a 4-cm-long latex balloon for performing anorectal manometry in 45 healthy subjects who were controlled for gender and age. Sequentially, subjects were asked to squeeze, bear down, or blow up a party balloon. Subsequently, rectal sensation, rectal compliance, and rectoanal reflexes were assessed simultaneously by performing intermittent phasic balloon distentions. Additionally, balloon defecation, pudendal nerve latency, and saline continence tests were performed. RESULTS: In men, the anal sphincter was longer (p < 0.05) and squeeze sphincter pressure and squeeze duration were higher (p < 0.01), but resting sphincter pressure was similar to that in women. When bearing down, although not significant, the defecation index was higher in men. Distinct thresholds for rectal sensation were identified but there was no gender difference. Likewise, rectal compliance and balloon expulsion time were similar. However, during saline infusion, the onset of first leak and total volume retained were higher (p < 0.001) and pudendal nerve latency was shorter (p < 0.05) in men. Overall, parity or age did not influence anorectal function. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the most comprehensive age- and gender-controlled assessment of anorectal function using solid state technology. Gender influences some parameters of anorectal function. Our results could serve as a valuable resource of normative data.     

Diagnosis of constipation in primary and secondary care

The evaluation of chronic constipation involves a careful delineation of its duration and characteristics as well as a physical examination including neurologic, anorectal, and perineal assessment. In patients who fail to respond to fiber supplements or simple laxatives, diagnostic studies such as barium radiography, rectal biopsy, and colonic transit studies may be warranted. Studies of defecation and anorectal function may be useful in those who complain of excessive straining or who use digital manipulation to facilitate evacuation. Most patients, however, do not require diagnostic studies beyond a careful history and physical examination, and are easily managed in the primary care setting.     

Diagnostic evaluation of platelet function disorders

Platelet function disorders are inherited and acquired conditions that represent a common cause of bleeding. Their clinical findings are generally similar to von Willebrand disease. It is often challenging to diagnose common platelet function disorders due to heterogeneity in their features, uncertainties about their pathogenesis and genetic cause, variability in the procedures used to assess platelet function in diagnostic laboratories and the lack of diagnostic criterion. Some inherited platelet function disorders have been established to increase risks for bleeding and bleeding scores. However, bleeding history assessment tools are not validated for use in diagnosing platelet function disorders. Standardized tests that assess aggregation function, dense granule deficiency and dense granule secretion are useful for diagnosing common platelet function disorders, in addition to some rare conditions. Guidelines have emerged to improve and standardize the laboratory tests for diagnosing platelet function disorders, including how to interpret aggregometry findings. Nonetheless, there is need to further evaluate the features, pathogenesis and genetic cause of many platelet function disorders, including the inherited conditions that impair granule secretion.     

Age-Related Aspects and Clinical Implications of Diagnosis and Treatment of Personality Disorders in Older Adults

To investigate age-related diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of personality disorders in later life (≥ 60 years) and implications in clinical practice, such as the introduction of a specific mental health care program, diagnostic assessment procedure, and treatment criteria for personality disorders in older adults, a Delphi study was conducted among 35 Dutch and Belgian experts in the field of personality disorders in older adults. Consensus on a statement was defined as agreement by two thirds or more of the experts. This Delphi study ultimately yielded consensus concerning 20 of the 21 statements. It was generally agreed that late-onset personality disorder is a useful construct in geriatric psychiatry and that aging can lead to a distinct behavioral expression of personality disorders in older adults. The experts confirmed that a specific mental health program is useful to refine the diagnostic assessment and treatment in older patients with personality disorders as well as older adults with mild psychiatric problems often superimposed on personality disorders, such as adjustment disorders, dysthymic disorders, and diffuse anxiety disorders. The Longitudinal, Expert, and All Data (LEAD) standard combined with a stepwise, multidimensional diagnostic approach appears highly suitable for personality assessment. Finally, stratification of subjects among four treatment levels was regarded as a useful strategy and there was agreement concerning specific criteria for each level of treatment. In conclusion, it is recommended that age-specific aspects in the diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders be included in guidelines and protocols and addressed in future scientific research. Further research is indicated involving cross-validation studies of these Delphi statements in other countries and evaluation of the clinical implementation of the specific mental health care program, diagnostic assessment procedure, and treatment criteria on clinical utility.     

Anorectal function

A review in a historic perspective of the present knowledge of anorectal physiology is presented. The techniques used in the anorectal physiology laboratory are discussed. Application of new sophisticated techniques to anorectal physiology research in recent years continue to improve our knowledge of anorectal function. Anal continence and defecation depend on both the anal sphincter and the rectum. The assessment of patients with functional anorectal diseases should include a more complete physiologic evaluation of the anorectum than used previously.     

Defecation disorders: An important subgroup of functional constipation, its pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment with biofeedback.

Functional defecation disorders are common and affect approximately 50% of patients with chronic constipation. The etiology of functional defecation disorders is not well known, but several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been described, including failure of rectoanal coordination, paradoxical anal contraction or insufficient relaxation of anal sphincter during defecation and impairment of rectal sensation as well as secondary slowing of colonic transit. Symptoms alone are inadequate to distinguish patients with defecation disorders from those with other types of constipation. Detailed clinical evaluation and anorectal physiologic tests are required for definitive diagnosis. There is also a pathophysiological association between functional defecation disorders and other anorectal conditions such as solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Among the various treatment modalities, biofeedback therapy has emerged as an effective and specific treatment method for functional defecation disorders. The main goals of biofeedback therapy are to relax the pelvic floor and anal sphincter muscles during defecation and to improve rectoanal coordination and sensory perception. Today, it is possible to diagnose most functional disorders of defecation and either effectively treat or ameliorate symptoms in a majority of these patients.