A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy was conducted in patients with chemonaive inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to assess response and toxicity. From October 1997 to August 1998, 19 patients were treated. The treatment schema included tamoxifen 60 mg twice daily by mouth on days 1 to 3, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 intravenous infusion (IV) 60 minutes with mesna on day 2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV 60 minutes on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The major toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 3 or 4 leukopenia or neutropenia occurred in 14 of 19 (73.7%) patients during treatment, and 6 patients (31.6%) experienced fever in association with the neutropenia; no toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3 anemia occurred in six patients (31.6%) during the treatment. Grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting occurred in only one patient. Toxicities other than neutropenia and anemia were minimal. After two cycles of treatment, 9 of 19 patients attained a partial response (47.4%, 95% confidence interval 24.9%-69.9%) in this study. The median time to disease progression was 6 months and median survival time was 12 months. We conclude that TIEP is an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with inoperable NSCLC.     

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin in elderly patients (>or= 65 years) with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin is one of the standard treatments for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In elderly patients, however, its efficacy and toxicity has not been well documented. In this Phase II study, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin and examined whether advanced age compromises it in elderly patients with previously untreated extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). METHODS: In this study, 46 previously untreated elderly patients (65 years or older) with ED-SCLC were given combination chemotherapy consisting of irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until patients completed the maximum six cycles. RESULTS: Patients consisted of 37 men and 9 women, whose median age was 70 years (range 65-81 years). A complete response and a partial response were observed in 19.6% (9/46) and 56.5% (26/46), respectively. The overall response rate was 76.1% (95% C.I; 63.8-88.4%). The overall median survival was 10.4 months (range 7.6-13.2 months). The median progression-free survival was 8.32 months (range 6.8-9.8 months). Major toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3-4, 58.7%), leukopenia (grade 3-4, 49.9%), infection (grade 3-4, 39.1%) and diarrhea (grade 3-4, 30.4%). Incidence of febrile neutropenia was significantly higher in patients with ECOG performance status 2-3 compared with ECOG performance status 0-1 (70.4% vs. 5.2%; p<0.001). There were two treatment related deaths in patients ECOG performance status 3. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin is an effective treatment for elderly patients with ED-SCLC who have good ECOG performance status and physicians should be aware of the mortality and morbidity due to myelosuppression following this treatment in elderly ED-SCLC patients with poor ECOG performance status.     

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study of the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan as first-line treatment in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemo-na?ve adult patients with a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received cisplatin 20mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days, etoposide 75mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days and irinotecan 120mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2, every 21 days for six to eight cycles. Administration of G-CSF was given in the presence of febrile neutropenia and as a 5-day prophylaxis around the recorded nadir day in patients who developed grades 3-4 neutropenia. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were assessable. The median age was 62.2 years; 96.4% had PS 0-1, 33.5% had >3 metastatic sites. The overall response rate was 80.4% with 8 (14.3%) patients achieving a complete response. The median time to tumor progression was 7.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.1-8.6 months] with a median survival of 15.1 months [95% CI, 9.7-20.5 months] and 1-year survival rate of 56.5%. One patient died from toxicity. Grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37.5% of patients, grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 10.9% of patients and 11 (19.6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicities were primarily nausea-vomiting 3.6%, diarrhea 7.1% and fatigue 3.6%. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests that cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan combination is very effective for the treatment of E-SCLC with good safety profile. The triplet regimen currently seems a promising regimen and has to be further explored in phase III trials.     

Serum Cyfra 21-1 as a co-variable in future NSCLC chemotherapy trials

The combination of paclitaxel and etoposide was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-five patients, median age 61, received treatment with paclitaxel 200 mg/m (2) intravenous over 3 h on day 1, and oral etoposide, 100 mg daily on days 1-5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of nine cycles, or until progression occurred. Twenty-eight patients had stage IV disease, and seven patients had stage IIIA or B disease. There was one complete and seven partial responses (overall response rate, 23%). Two of these responses were in patients with stage III disease (29%) and six in patients with stage IV disease (21%). Median survival was 8.7 months, and 36% of patients were alive at 1 year. There were no treatment-related deaths and little grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity although grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 60% of patients (33% of cycles). There were four episodes of febrile neutropenia. The combination of paclitaxel and oral etoposide is active in advanced NSCLC and can be delivered with acceptable toxicity.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients failing previous chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel

Docetaxel has shown activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has failed previous chemotherapy. Ifosfamide is an active alkylating agent used in the first-line treatment of NSCLC. We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide chemotherapy in two groups (one with and one without previous paclitaxel treatment) of NSCLC patients who had failed previous chemotherapy, to assess the response and toxicity of this combination chemotherapy. Fifty patients were enrolled from June 2000 to December 2001, including 26 patients treated with paclitaxel-containing agents and 24 patients who had never been treated with paclitaxel. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) intravenous infusion on day 1 of every 3 weeks. Two hundred and thirty-eight cycles of treatment were given, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-8 cycles). All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 40 patients (80%) during treatment. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 7 patients (14%). Grade 3 anemia occurred in 2 patients. The majority of patients needed a decrease in the treatment dose due to grade 4 or febrile neutropenia. Interstitial pneumonitis occurred in 3 patients, leading to the death of two. Other toxicities were few and mild in severity. After two cycles of treatment, 5 patients (10%) had a partial response (95% confidence interval 1.7-18.3%), including 2 patients previously treated with paclitaxel and 3 who had not received this treatment. More patients who had been previously treated with paclitaxel suffered from progressive disease than among those who had never been treated with paclitaxel (P = 0.049). The median time to disease progression was 5 months and the median survival was 8.2 months. Median survival was 7.6 and 8.7 months, respectively, in patients with and without previous paclitaxel treatment (P = 0.56). Median survival was 8.7 and 7.6 months in patients receiving docetaxel and ifosfamide as second- and third-line chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.327). In conclusion, docetaxel and ifosfamide salvage chemotherapy produces a relatively low response rate, low dose intensity, and higher proportion of severe neutropenia in NSCLC. Physicians should be alert to the potential of interstitial pneumonitis. Nevertheless, median survival was of a reasonable duration.     

Vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination as salvage chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life as compared with the best supportive care alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, several recent studies using new drugs such as docetaxel have demonstrated that second-line chemotherapy may be of value. METHODS: We studied the efficacy of combination treatment with vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (NIP) as salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From March 1998 to December 1999, 44 previously treated patients (etoposide/cisplatin (EP): 36, EP--> taxane/cisplatin: 8) were treated with a chemotherapy regimen consisting of vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 15 and 12.5 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 8), ifosfamide (3 g/m(2) i.v. on day 1 with mesna) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1). The cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response. The median follow-up duration was 19.1 months (range, 4.4-28.3 months). The objective response rate was 27.3% (95% CI, 14.1%-40.5%) with one complete response and 11 partial responses. The median response duration was 4.1 months (range, 1.5-13 months). The median time to progression was 2.9 months (range, 0.7-15.3 months). The main toxicity was hematologic in the 138 evaluable courses, granulocytopenia (>or=grade III) and anemia (>or=grade III) were observed in 3.6% and 0.7% of the patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicities were minor and easily controlled. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia were reported. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: In this study, the combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin showed a significant efficacy with acceptable toxicities as salvage chemotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC patients.     

Phase I study of tirapazamine plus cisplatin/etoposide and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (S0004): a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and a recommended phase II dose of tirapazamine when combined with chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy consisted of two cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, and once-daily radiation to 61 Gy. Tirapazamine (260 mg/m2) was given 1 h before cisplatin with planned dose escalation to 330 mg/m2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity, defined as > or =33% esophagitis (grade 3 or above). Consolidation therapy consisted of two cycles of tirapazamine (330 mg/m2), cisplatin, and etoposide. Complete responders received prophylactic cranial irradiation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled at the 260 mg/m2 tirapazamine dose. All had performance status of 0-1. By comparison with S9713, a predecessor Southwest Oncology Group study in LSCLC that used the same concurrent chemoradiotherapy without tirapazamine, the present trial showed a higher rate of grade 3-4 esophagitis (34% versus 22%), vomiting (34% versus 23%), and febrile neutropenia (7% versus 2%). The consolidation phase was relatively well tolerated, with grade 4 neutropenia in 44% and febrile neutropenia in 5% of patients. There were two treatment-related deaths: one from neutropenic fever and one from respiratory infection. The overall response rate was 80%, and the median survival was 22 months. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicity was observed at the initial tirapazamine dose, precluding dose escalation. Compared with S9713, the addition of tirapazamine increased the incidence of vomiting, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia, although the overall toxicity profile remained acceptable. In view of the observed favorable survival, further study of tirapazamine in LSCLC is warranted.     

A phase I and pharmacological study of amrubicin and topotecan in patients of small-cell lung cancer with relapsed or extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered to be a standard treatment in patients with relapsed or extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the survival benefit remains modest. Relapsed or ED-SCLC patients were enrolled. Topotecan and amrubicin were administered on Days 1-5 and on Days 3-5, respectively. Nine patients received a total of 24 cycles. Since all three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia) at the third dose level (topotecan: 0.75 mg/m2, amrubicin 40 mg/m2), the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be this dose level. Objective response was observed in six patients (67%). The maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of amrubicin increased in a dose-dependent manner. Amrubicin did not influence the pharmacokinetics of topotecan. The Cmax and AUC of amrubicin were correlated with the duration of grade 4 neutropenia. The mean Cmax of topotecan on day 2 in responders (22.9+/-3.6) was significantly higher than that in non-responders (10.9+/-0.4). This phase I study showed the safety and activity of two-drug combination of amrubicin and topotecan in patients with relapsed or ED-SCLC.     

A phase II trial of the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE: This phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP) in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included in the study were those with surgically unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, with bidimensionally measurable disease, a Karnofsky performance status > 60, and who had not received previous chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, 3 g/m(2) ifosfamide on day 1, and 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1, administered in 21-day cycles. A maximum of six cycles were administered. RESULTS: Between March 1996 and December 1997, 60 patients were included in the study (37 stage III and 23 stage IV), of which 59 were evaluated for response. An objective response was obtained in 43% of patients (3% complete and 40% partial responses), whereas 22% had stable disease. The median survival time for the whole group was 52 weeks (65 weeks in patients with stage III, and 35 weeks in stage IV). The most frequent toxicity was haematological, 56% of patients presented grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity in one of the cycles, although only seven episodes of febrile neutropenia were recorded in the 255 cycles administered. CONCLUSIONS: The GIP regimen attains response rates similar to those obtained with the gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination used in advanced NSCLC, and had an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Phase II study of pemetrexed with and without folic acid and vitamin B12 as front-line therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: This phase II clinical study evaluated the efficacy of pemetrexed for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of MPM, chemotherapy-naive measurable lesions, and adequate organ function received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) intravenously over 10 minutes every 3 weeks. After a protocol change, most patients also received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation to improve safety. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were enrolled. Nine (14.1%) of the 64 patients had a partial response. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for median overall survival was 10.7 months. Forty-three patients received vitamin supplementation for all courses of therapy, and 21 patients did not. Seven of the nine responders were vitamin supplemented. The median overall survival was 13.0 months for supplemented patients and 8.0 months for nonsupplemented patients. Vitamin-supplemented patients completed more cycles of therapy than nonsupplemented patients (median, six v two cycles, respectively). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (23.4%) and grade 3/4 leukopenia (18.8%) were the most common laboratory toxicities. Fatigue and febrile neutropenia were the most commonly reported nonlaboratory events (grade 3, 6.3%; grade 4, 0.0% each). The incidence of these toxicities was generally lower in the supplemented patients. CONCLUSION: Single-agent pemetrexed for MPM resulted in a moderate response rate (14.1%) and median overall survival of 10.7 months. Patients supplemented with folic acid and vitamin B12 tolerated treatment better (less toxicity and more cycles of treatment) and had a 5-month greater median overall survival than nonsupplemented patients. These results indicate that patients with MPM could benefit from single-agent pemetrexed treatment combined with vitamin supplementation.     

Epirubicin/paclitaxel/etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of escalating doses of epirubicin and paclitaxel plus fixed dose of etoposide and to define the activity of the triplet in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Thirteen patients entered the phase I study: the maximum tolerated doses were epirubicin (EpiDX) 90 mg m-2 and paclitaxel (P) 175 mg m-2 with febrile neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicity. The recommended schedule for this regimen for the phase II study was EpiDX 75 mg m-2, P 175 mg m-2, etoposide (E) 100 mg m-2 intravenous (fixed dose) days 1-3 with courses repeated every 21 days. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) was not allowed. Twenty patients entered the phase II trial: median age was 61 years (range 50-70), median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (0-2); nine patients had visceral disease and 17 had more than two metastatic sites. A total of 100 courses were administered with a median of 5 (range 1-6) per patients. Main toxicity (NCI-CTC) was myelosuppression: neutropenia grades 3 and 4 in 16 and 35% of the courses, respectively. Seven episodes of febrile neutropenia were documented and one patient required hospital admission. Nonhaematological toxicity was moderate. Seven out of 19 evaluable patients achieved a complete response (37%), nine patients (47.3%) a partial response with an overall response rate of 84.2% (95% confidence interval=60.4-96.6). In this poor prognostic population of patients the triplet epirubicin/paclitaxel/etoposide showed high antitumour activity with mild nonhaematological side effects. The use of CSFs should be able to improve the haematological profile.     

Carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide as intensive chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Thirty-two previously untreated, fit patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with an intensive combination chemotherapy regimen, with the aim of prolonging survival, as follows: carboplatin 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, ifosfamide 5 g/m2 IV day 1 in a 24-hour infusion with mesna, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3, repeating at 28-day intervals for six courses. Limited-disease (LD) patients were given concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy for the first two courses, and all patients achieving a complete remission (CR) were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). For 18 LD patients, the overall response was 94% with 72% CRs. For 14 extensive-disease (ED) patients the overall response was 100% with 29% CRs. Median response duration for LD patients was 11.5 months and for ED patients 7.5 months. Median survival for LD patients was 19 months with a predicted 24% 2-year survival and for ED patients 9.5 months with a predicted 14% 2-year survival. Hematologic toxicity was severe with 100% developing World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 neutropenia and 94% WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia during treatment. Seventy-two percent of patients required a dose reduction at some stage during treatment because of neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusions. Despite very high response rates, this intensive regimen achieves survival results only modestly better, if at all, than those reported for less toxic conventional regimens.     

Phase II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin as second-line treatment in relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of the paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PIC) combination in relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those with SCLC who had progressed or relapsed after therapy with carboplatin and etoposide (with or without chest radiotherapy). The PIC regimen consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2; PIC was given every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (30 men and three women) were entered onto the study (median age, 62 years [range, 55 to 70 years]; median performance status, 1 [range, 0 to 2]). Metastatic sites at study entry included the lymph nodes (n = 13 patients), bone (n = 9), liver (n = 5), brain (n = 6), lung nodules (n = 8), adrenal glands (n = 9), and other (n = 2) Responses included eight complete remissions and 16 partial remissions (overall response rate, 73% [24 of 33 patients]). Five patients had stable disease and two had progressive disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 21 and 28 weeks, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 12%, with two patients alive without evidence of disease at 76 and 104 weeks since PIC initiation. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 30 patients (24 [73%] developed grade 4 neutropenia [ < 5 days]) and febrile neutropenia in six patients (18%); grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in nine patients (27%). No grade 3 neuropathy was observed; grade 1 or 2 CNS toxicity was seen in five patients, there was no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias were seen in nine patients, grade 2 diarrhea was seen in one patient, and grade 3 nausea or vomiting was seen in seven patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: In the present phase II study, the PIC combination seemed highly active and tolerable in patients with relapsed SCLC when it was administered as second-line treatment. Given the present experience, an evaluation of the PIC regimen as front-line treatment of SCLC is planned.     

Chemotherapy dose-intensification for pediatric patients with Ewing's family of tumors and desmoplastic small round-cell tumors: a feasibility study at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of dose-intensification for patients with Ewing's family of tumors (EFT) and desmoplastic small round-cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1992 to June 1996, we treated 53 consecutive patients on our Ewing's protocol. Induction comprised three cycles of ifosfamide/etoposide on days 1 to 3 and cyclophosphamide (CTX)/doxorubicin on day 5, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Local control using surgery and/or radiotherapy started at week 9 along with vincristine/dactinomycin. Maintenance included four alternating cycles of ifosfamide/etoposide and doxorubicin/CTX, with randomization to one of two CTX dose levels to determine the feasibility of dose-intensification during maintenance. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 13.4 years (range, 4.5 to 24.9 years); 34 patients were male and 43 patients were white. Nineteen patients presented with metastatic disease, 29 had tumors greater than 8 cm in diameter, and 26 had primary bone tumors. These patients received 155 induction cycles, 91% of which resulted in grade 4 neutropenia, 68% in febrile neutropenia, and 68% in grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia. During maintenance, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 81% and 85% of cycles, respectively. Thirty-five patients (66%) completed all therapy, only 13 without significant delays; three developed secondary myeloid malignancies. The toxicity and time to therapy completion were similar in both CTX arms. Estimated 3-year survival and event-free survival were 72%+/-8% and 60%+/-9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although intensifying therapy seems feasible for 25% of patients on this study, toxicity was considerable. Therefore, the noninvestigational use of dose-intensification in patients with EFT should await assessment of its impact on disease-free survival.     

Food groups and risk of lung cancer in Uruguay

BACKGROUND: No standard treatment is defined for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Carboplatin and etoposide are highly active agents against SCLC. In this study, we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination of these two agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four untreated patients with limited or extensive SCLC and median age of 73.9 years entered the study. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin i.v. on day 1 (AUC 5 using Calvert's formula) and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) given orally on days 1-5, every 4 weeks, and thoracic irradiation was given to limited disease patients after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The overall response rates was 59% (95% CI: 43-76). The median survival for all patients was 37 weeks (range 3-76 weeks). The toxicity was mainly haematological with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 59% of courses, febrile neutropenia in 15% of courses, and toxic death in 9% of patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this regimen are disappointing with worse response and survival, and more haematological toxicity than expected and previously reported, despite the use of Calvert's formula. Possible explanations are the use of etoposide per os rather than i.v., the frequent comorbidities of older patients and the inclusion of patients with poor prognosis factors.     

Neoadjuvant etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin for the treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: The optimal chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma has not been clearly defined. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) for patients with olfactory neuroblastoma. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with newly diagnosed olfactory neuroblastoma were treated with etoposide (75 mg/m2), ifosfamide (1000 mg/m2), and cisplatin (20 mg/m2) all administered intravenously on Days 1-5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had previously received surgery or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Nine patients achieved objective responses (objective response rate, 82%; 95% confidence interval, 52-95%), which included 2 complete responses and 7 partial responses. The major side effect was hematologic toxicity, with Grade 3/4 neutropenia observed after the receipt of 37% of all cycles and febrile neutropenia observed after the receipt of 2 cycles. All toxic events were reversible, and no chemotherapy-related deaths were documented. The median survival period was 18 months (range, 3-45 months). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant VIP chemotherapy was active in the treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma.     

A multicenter phase II study of the combination of irinotecan and gemcitabine in previously treated patients with small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan and gemcitabine in pretreated patients having small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (median age 60 years, performance status 0-1 in 87% and 2 in 13% of the patients) with limited or extensive-stage disease, refractory or relapsing after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen, received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 21 days. Sixteen (52%) patients had sensitive and 15 (48%) refractory disease. Fifteen patients (48%) had received > or =2 prior regimens. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 26 for response analysis. A median of three (range 1-6) cycles per patient was administered. Three partial responses were documented for an overall response rate of 10% (95% CI 0.73-20.09), and disease stabilization was obtained in 7 patients (22%; intention-to-treat analysis). Two of the responders had refractory, and 1 had sensitive disease. The median time to progression was 4.5 months, the median duration of responses was 2.5 months, and the median survival time was 6 months. Grade 3-4 (WHO) neutropenia was observed in 9 patients (29%), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 4 (13%), and grade 3-4 diahrrea in 3 patients (10%). Three patients experienced febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination showed modest activity in this patient group with a poor prognosis. Thus we believe it merits further investigation in the treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer who have failed one prior chemotherapy regimen.     

Phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer failing previous chemotherapy

We conducted a phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed previous chemotherapy, in order to assess the response and toxicity of TIEP. Between November 1997 and May 1999, 25 patients were treated. Twelve of the 25 patients (48%) had been previously treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. TIEP doses were tamoxifen 60 mg oral twice daily on days 1-3; ifosfamide 2.4 g/m(2) intravenous infusion (IV) 60 min with mesna on day 2; epirubicin 40 mg/m(2) IV bolus on day 2; and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) IV 60 min on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. Seventy one cycles were given to 25 patients, with a median of three cycles (range one to six cycles). All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. As expected, the major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 15 patients (60%) during treatment, as well as in 31% of the total courses. Febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients. No toxic death occurred in this study. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in five patients with five cycles. Toxicities other than myelosuppression were few and mild in severity. After two cycles of treatment, five of 25 patients (20%) had a partial response (95% confidence interval 4.3-35.7%). Among 12 patients previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, three patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months and median survival was 7.7 months. The response rate and median survival were better than in our previous study of salvage chemotherapy with ifosfamide, 5-FU, and leucovorin; and with ifosfamide, epirubicin, 5-FU, and leucovorin. In conclusion, TIEP appears to be an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with NSCLC who have failed previous chemotherapy.     

A multicenter, randomized, Phase II study of cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine or cisplatin plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with poor-prognosis small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine (PEG) and combined cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage and poor-prognosis limited-stage small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred forty patients (70 patients in two arms) were randomized to receive either cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on Day 1, etoposide 50 mg/m2 on Days 1-3, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 or cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on Day 1 plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8. Both regimens were recycled every 21 days. RESULTS: In total, 626 cycles were delivered (303 cycles of PEG and 323 cycles of PG), with a median of 4 cycles per patient in both arms. The objective response rate was 63% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 49-71%) for PEG and 57% (95%CI, 43-67%) for PG, with the suggestion of a higher complete response rate in the PEG arm (18.6% and 4.3%, respectively). A similar time to disease progression (6 months in the PEG arm and 7 months in the PG arm) and a similar median survival (9.5 months in the PEG arm and 10 months in the PG arm) were observed in both arms. The PEG regimen was associated with more severe hematologic toxicity in terms of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and a higher rate of treatment delays and dose reductions, whereas nonhematologic toxicities did not differ between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this Phase II randomized trial, the PEG regimen produced a higher complete response rate but more toxicity compared with the PG regimen in patients with extensive-stage or poor-prognosis, limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma.     

Cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel was studied in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in a phase I component followed by a phase II trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated between October 1993 and April 1997. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 3, and paclitaxel 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 over 3 hours. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The MTD was reached in the first six patients. In these six patients and in the next 35 patients, who were entered onto the phase II trial, response and survival were estimated. RESULTS: At the initial dose level, one of six patients developed febrile neutropenia, and five of six achieved targeted neutropenia (nadir absolute granulocyte count, 100 to 1,000/microL) without any other dose-limiting toxicity, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 88 (47%) of 188 total courses administered at or less than the MTD. Neutropenia was associated with fever in only 17 (9%) of 188 courses, but two patients experienced neutropenic sepsis that was fatal. Nonhematologic toxicity greater than grade 2 was observed in 10 (5%) of 188 total courses, with fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and nausea/vomiting most common. The overall objective response rate was 90% of 38 assessable patients: six complete responses (16%) and 28 partial responses(74%). Median progression-free and overall survival durations were 31 and 47 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel produced response and survival rates similar to those of other combinations and was well tolerated.