Changes in Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in the antrum and corpus during and after 12 months of treatment with ranitidine and lansoprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer disease

Background:

Several studies have shown that acid-suppressing treatment leads to aggravation of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in the corpus. It remains unclear whether this augmentation of the inflammation reverts to baseline after termination of treatment.

Methods:

In 114 H. pylori-infected duodenal ulcer patients we investigated the gastritis parameters in antral and corpus mucosa before treatment, after 6 and 12 months of therapy, and 6 months after termination of treatment with 15 mg lansoprazole or 150 mg ranitidine/day.

Results:

Lansoprazole and ranitidine led to a significant aggravation of gastritis in the corpus after 6 and 12 months of treatment. However, while there was no change in gastritis in the antrum with ranitidine, treatment with lansoprazole led to partial elimination of H. pylori with improvement of the inflammation in this part of the stomach. Following termination of therapy, the observed changes reverted to baseline. No increase in intestinal metaplasia and/or atrophy in the antrum or corpus was observed.

Conclusion:

Both substances are associated with an aggravation of H. pylori gastritis in the corpus. However, only lansoprazole leads to a partial elimination of H. pylori with improvement of the inflammation in the antrum. The changes provoked by acid-suppressing treatment revert to baseline after termination of therapy.

     

Changes in Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in the antrum and corpus during long-term acid-suppressive treatment in Japan

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that acid-suppressive therapy aggravates corpus gastritis in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, promoting the development of atrophic gastritis. AIM: To study the effects of long-term use of antisecretory agents on the H. pylori-positive gastric mucosa in Japan, a country with a high incidence of gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 141 H. pylori-positive patients who had peptic ulcers or reflux oesophagitis were treated for 3 years with either omeprazole (20 mg/day) alone (n=7) or with omeprazole for primary therapy (8 weeks), followed by famotidine (40 mg/day) for maintenance therapy (n=134). Endoscopy was performed before, during, and after treatment. Biopsy specimens were taken from the greater curvature of the antrum and corpus and were examined histologically. RESULTS: The long-term use of famotidine after 8 weeks of treatment with omeprazole distinctly decreased H. pylori density and neutrophil infiltration in the antrum, but did not change H. pylori density in the corpus. The gastritis score increased in patients who had no, or only mild corpus gastritis before treatment (n=74), and significantly decreased in those who had moderate or severe gastritis before treatment (n=60). In four of the seven patients who received long-term treatment with omeprazole alone, neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density decreased not only in the antrum but also in the corpus. There was no increase in intestinal metaplasia or mucosal atrophy as assessed endoscopically during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Changes in corpus gastritis in response to acid-suppressive therapy depend on the severity of gastritis before treatment. Long-term use of acid-suppressive therapy apparently does not accelerate the development of atrophy or intestinal metaplasia in Japanese patients.     

Patterns of gastritis and the effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Western patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia

Summary

Background

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the development of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease is controversial.

Aim

To determine the incidence of symptoms of reflux disease and of erosive oesophagitis, and the relationship to changes in histological gastritis, in patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia over 12 months.

Methods

Six hundred and ninety‐three patients in two similar randomized placebo controlled trials of H. pylori eradication in non‐ulcer dyspepsia were studied. Symptoms were assessed using the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale during a 1‐week run‐in period, at 6 months and 12 months. Endoscopy was performed at baseline to exclude patients with pathology and at 3 months and 12 months to determine if oesophagitis was present. Gastric biopsies were scored using the modified Sydney Classification.

Results

Patients without predominant heartburn, oesophagitis or ulcers at endoscopy were randomized to active (n = 297, omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) treatment or to placebo/omeprazole (n = 306) for 1 week. The eradication rate was 82% in the active treatment group. Antrum‐predominant gastritis (55%) was more frequently found than corpus‐predominant gastritis (6%). In patients with antrum‐predominant gastritis, heartburn and regurgitation scores improved significantly 12 months after eradication. Erosive oesophagitis developed in 15/232 patients in the eradication group (7%) compared with 2/227 (2%) in the control group, but there was no significant difference when adjusted for oesophagitis present at baseline.

Conclusions

Antrum‐predominant gastritis is the most common pattern of gastritis seen in non‐ulcer dyspepsia in Western populations. Heartburn and regurgitation improve after eradication therapy or placebo in patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia; the development of oesophagitis is uncommon.

     

Acceptability of lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease : ACEPTO study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability of lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets (LODT) in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). METHODS: A multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study of patients diagnosed with GORD aged > or =18 years under the care of 272 gastroenterologists. Acceptability was determined by global patient assessment whereby the drug's organoleptic characteristics and properties were evaluated by a self-administered 11-item ad hoc questionnaire with a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS: A total of 734 patients (mean age 49.6 years [SD = 15.2]) with GORD who had been prescribed LODT > or =14 days prior to inclusion in the study were evaluable for the main endpoint. Of these, 51.1% were men. Most patients (80.7%) had been treated with doses of LODT 30mg/day for an average of 52.7 days (SD = 59.3). Overall, 93.6% of patients rated LODT treatment as 'very acceptable' or 'acceptable'. The degree of acceptability was associated with the perception that the formulation helps treatment compliance (p < 0.001). The drug's properties were rated as follows: size 'neither large nor small' (70.0%); flavour 'very pleasant' or 'pleasant' (75.2%); intensity of flavour 'neither strong nor mild', 'mild' or 'very mild' (86.1%); no 'sandy sensation' (53.4%); speed of dissolving 'fast' or 'very fast' (80.2%); use of tablets 'very easy' or 'easy' (92.4%) and use of tablets 'very convenient' or 'convenient' (91.0%). Three adverse reactions, none of them serious, were reported in three patients (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: LODT were well accepted by patients with GORD. Patients reported that this formulation improved compliance with therapy. Tolerability was excellent.     

Clinical and fiscal impact of lansoprazole intolerance in veterans with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Omeprazole was replaced by lansoprazole as the only proton pump inhibitor on the Veterans Affairs (VA) formulary in February 1997. We aimed to assess the clinical and fiscal impact of this conversion at two VA hospitals. METHODS: We identified lansoprazole intolerant patients using pharmacy databases. We reviewed medical records to obtain data regarding reasons for lansoprazole intolerance. The costs of the formulary change and the savings to the VA were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 3833 patients required long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy; 2224 (58%) were started on lansoprazole and 1479 (39%) were converted from omeprazole to lansoprazole. The remaining 130 (3.4%) patients were never converted from omeprazole to lansoprazole. Of the 3833 patients, 325 (8.5%) currently receive omeprazole therapy; of these, 195 out of 3703 (5.3%) patients are true lansoprazole failures; 172 of these 195 patients completed the study. Most (87%) of the lansoprazole intolerant patients received prior omeprazole. Discontinuation of lansoprazole was due to poor symptom control in 69% and/or side-effects (22%) including diarrhoea (10%), abdominal pain (5%), or hives (1%). The 1-year cost of managing lansoprazole failure in 195 patients was $61 690. However, the savings to the VA during the same time period, which totalled $321 360, more than offset the costs associated with the conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Lansoprazole intolerance requiring omeprazole conversion occurred in 5% of veterans on proton pump inhibitor therapy for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and in 10% of patients with prior omeprazole success. The VA realized substantial cost savings in association with the formulary change.     

Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: lansoprazole vs. pantoprazole

BACKGROUND: : Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression is an important therapeutic goal in complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIM: : To compare the efficacy of lansoprazole and pantoprazole in normalizing oesophageal acid exposure. METHODS: : Fifty patients with complicated or atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg lansoprazole (n = 26) or 40 mg pantoprazole (n = 24) once daily. Three to four weeks after the start of treatment, patients underwent 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring whilst on therapy. If the results were improved but still abnormal, the dosage was doubled and pH monitoring was repeated. If oesophageal acid exposure was not improved, the patient was shifted to the alternative drug regimen. RESULTS: : Oesophageal acid exposure was normalized in all 26 patients treated with lansoprazole (in 35% of cases with a double daily dosage), whereas in six of the 24 (25%) patients treated with pantoprazole it was neither normalized nor lowered (P = 0.008). Accordingly, the mean percentage acid reflux time was significantly lower for the lansoprazole group (2.1) than for the pantoprazole group (5.8) (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: : Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression can be accomplished more reliably with lansoprazole than with pantoprazole in patients with complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.     

Long-term lansoprazole treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: clinical efficacy and influence on gastric mucosa

BACKGROUND: Long-term acid suppression is believed to accelerate atrophic gastritis in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. The influence of long-term therapy with lansoprazole has not been examined. AIM: To study the clinical and endoscopic efficacy and histological evolution of gastric mucosa during 5 years of maintenance treatment with lansoprazole, 30 mg. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with endoscopically proven oesophagitis were followed for 5 years. Biopsies taken at the start of the study, during follow-up and after 5 years were available for 73 patients. RESULTS: The total endoscopic relapse rate was 14.1%. At the start of the study, 34 patients were Helicobacter pylori negative and 39 were Helicobacter pylori positive (two atrophy, 25 antral gastritis, 12 pangastritis). At 5 years, no histological changes had occurred in Helicobacter pylori-negative patients. In the Helicobacter pylori-positive group, 20 patients developed pangastritis, six had normal histology and one had antral gastritis. Ten of the 12 patients with pangastritis had reduced antral activity. There was no increase in intestinal metaplasia, but there was a tendency towards regression of atrophy in the antrum and towards increased atrophy in the body of the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance treatment with lansoprazole, 30 mg, is efficacious. The development of glandular atrophy and intestinal metaplasia was not accelerated in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. Helicobacter pylori eradication must be considered only because of the higher cancer risk associated with chronic Helicobacter pylori-related gastritis.     

A comparison of esomeprazole and lansoprazole for control of intragastric pH in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Intragastric acid suppression is the most direct measure of the pharmacodynamic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, which are the most effective drugs for acid-related diseases. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of once and twice daily dosing of lansoprazole and esomeprazole in controlling intragastric acidity (target gastric pH > 4.0) over a 24-hour period. METHODS: In an open-label, two-way crossover study, 45 Helicobacter pylori-negative patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomized to receive one of two regimens: 30 mg lansoprazole or esomeprazole 40 mg once daily. Intragastric pH was assessed by 24-hour pH monitoring on day 5 of each regimen. Dosing was increased to twice daily and pH was reassessed on day 10. Following a 14-day washout, patients were crossed over to the other medication and the dosage regimens and pH assessments were repeated. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 35 patients who completed all scheduled assessments and had 24-hour monitoring for each end-point. Mean time pH > 4.0 and mean 24-hour pH were highest for esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, esomeprazole 40 mg once daily and lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provided superior control of intragastric pH compared with either once or twice daily dosing of lansoprazole and once daily dosing of esomeprazole (P < 0.01). Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily was comparable with lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily and both were superior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Response to acid suppression treatment depends on the treatment selected. Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provided better control of intragastric pH than all other regimens evaluated. Esomeprazole 40 mg daily, however, was comparable with lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily and superior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily.     

Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs. omeprazole In patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole (Nexium) is a new proton pump inhibitor for the treatment of acid-related diseases. METHODS: In this double-blind crossover study, 38 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were randomized to esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg and omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 5 days. On day 5 of each dosing period, 24-h intragastric pH and pharmacokinetic variables were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients aged 29-58 (mean 45) years completed the study. Esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg maintained intragastric pH > 4 for (mean) 16.8 and 12.7 h, respectively, vs. 10.5 h for omeprazole 20 mg (P < 0.001 and P < 0. 01). Twenty-four-hour median intragastric pH was significantly higher with esomeprazole 40 mg (4.9) and 20 mg (4.1) than with omeprazole 20 mg (3.6) (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was 80% higher for esomeprazole 20 mg vs. omeprazole, while that for esomeprazole 40 mg was more than five times higher (each P < 0.0001). Interpatient variability in intragastric pH and AUC was less with esomeprazole than with omeprazole. Esomeprazole was well tolerated and there were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole provides more effective acid control than omeprazole, with reduced interpatient variability, thereby offering the potential for improved efficacy in acid-related diseases.     

Baclofen-mediated gastro-oesophageal acid reflux control in patients with established reflux disease

AIM: To explore the effect of baclofen on oesophageal acid exposure in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with established reflux disease were included in this double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Baclofen, 40 mg, or placebo was given as a single dose with a washout period of 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed by a visual analogue scale. Oesophageal pH was registered for 12 h and analysed for the whole period and for the 0-4-h, 4-8-h, 8-12-h and 2-h post-prandial periods. RESULTS: Baclofen significantly reduced the number of reflux episodes during the 0-4-h (7.9 vs. 16.5, P < 0.0001; post-prandially: 6.0 vs. 11.2, P < 0.0001) and 0-12-h (46.5 vs. 73, P=0.0001; post-prandially: 18.8 vs. 29.3, P < 0.0001) periods. The fraction of time with pH < 4 was significantly lowered during the 0-4-h period (9.3 vs. 15.6, P=0.0019; post-prandially: 16.1 vs. 23.5, P=0.0083). Similar results were also obtained in patients with a hiatus hernia (n=13). Belching was significantly reduced (32 vs. 69 episodes, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of 40 mg baclofen significantly reduced both the number of reflux episodes and the fraction of time with pH < 4, an effect primarily found during the first 4 h after dosing.     

Cisapride in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Prokinetic agents are being used increasingly in medical therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study examined the effect of 10 mg q.d.s., oral cisapride, or placebo, taken for 12 weeks, on 48 patients with symptoms and endoscopic evidence of GERD. Objective evaluation of benefit was obtained by endoscopy and biopsy, oesophageal manometry, acid reflux provocation test and 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring. Cisapride significantly increased lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (P= 0.003) against baseline and also against placebo, in patients (n= 9) with an hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (P < 0.01). The frequency of dyspeptic symptoms was significantly improved in the cisapride group (P= 0.03). Antacid intake, global evaluation of symptoms and a VAS score for symptoms were all better than placebo but failed to reach significance (global evaluation by patients, P= 0.07). Overall, there was no significant improvement in oesophagitis at either 6 weeks (P < 0.05 > 0.3) or 12 weeks (P= 0.07). However, if patients with grades I and II oesophagitis at entry were excluded, cisapride had a significantly greater effect than placebo, 6 weeks (P= 0.05), 12 weeks (P= 0.04). In those with oesophageal ulceration, cisapride was significantly more effective than placebo in inducing healing. Gastro-oesophageal reflux was very variable on both 24-h pH monitoring and acid reflux provocation test. In spite of a 50% decrease in acid exposure on 24-h pH monitoring (cisapride group, mean % pH < 4 day: entry 18.9%, 12 weeks 9.6%), there were no significant intra- or intergroup differences for percentage of time < pH 4, or frequency and duration of episodes, neither pre- or post-prandially, day or night, except for the number of post-prandial episodes during acid reflux provocation tests, which decreased significantly more with cisapride than with placebo (P < 0.05). Thus, oral cisapride when taken for 12 weeks promoted healing of oesophagitis and improved symptoms in patients with GERD; although an increase in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was observed and a reduction in acid reflux was measured, no significant decrease of acid exposure was seen.     

White wine and beer induce gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease

BACKGROUND: An induction of gastro-oesophageal reflux has been reported after ingestion of alcoholic beverages in healthy volunteers. However, it is unknown whether reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients will be enhanced by the ingestion of alcoholic beverages. AIM: To investigate the effects of wine and beer on postprandial reflux in reflux patients. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (reflux oesophagitis 15, non-erosive reflux disease 10; 18 men and seven women) drank 300-mL white wine (n = 17), 500-mL beer (n = 8), or identical amounts of tap water (controls) together with a standardized meal in a randomized order. pH-measurement was carried out during three postprandial hours by pH-metry and the percentage of time pH < 4 was calculated. RESULTS: Both alcoholic beverages increased reflux compared with water [wine 23% (median), water 12%, P < 0.01; beer 25%, water 11%, P < 0.05]. Between wine and beer, no difference in reflux induction was obtained. The reflux induction was seen in patients with (23%, P < 0.01) and without reflux oesophagitis (22%, P < 0.05) and in both sexes (women 23%, men 25%, P < 0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: Ingestion of commonly consumed alcoholic beverages such as wine and beer induces gastro-oesophageal reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Therefore, these patients should be advised to avoid the intake of large amounts (> or = 300 mL) of these beverages.     

The effect of omeprazole on gastro-oesophageal reflux and symptoms during strenuous exercise

BACKGROUND: Strenuous exercise exacerbates gastro-oesophageal reflux and symptoms and this may be diminished by antisecretory medication with omeprazole. METHODS: Fourteen well-trained athletes (13 men, one woman), who indicated suffering from either heartburn, regurgitation or chest pain during competition running, performed two experimental trials at 2-week intervals using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. During the 6 days preceding the trial and on the trial day itself either 20 mg of omeprazole or a placebo was administered. Two hours after a low-fat breakfast and 1 h after the last study dose, the trial started with five successive 50-min periods: rest, three running periods on a treadmill, and recovery. Reflux (percentage time and number of periods oesophageal pH <4) was measured with an ambulant pH system during these periods. RESULTS: Compared to rest, reflux lasted significantly longer and occurred more frequently during the first running period, irrespective of the intervention, whereas during the second running period this effect was only observed with the placebo. Reflux occurred for longer and more frequently with the placebo than with omeprazole, but this was significant during the first two running periods only. Seven subjects reported heartburn, regurgitation and/or chest pain during exercise, irrespective of the intervention. Only a minority of the symptom periods was actually associated with acid reflux and in all cases this concerned periods with heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: Running-induced acid reflux, but not symptoms, were decreased by omeprazole, probably because most symptoms were not related to acid reflux.     

Recurrent symptoms and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with duodenal ulcer treated for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been shown to prevent relapse of endoscopically detected duodenal ulcers. There is controversy regarding symptom improvement after therapy. Some studies have suggested that a substantial number of patients remain symptomatic after eradication therapy. Other studies suggest that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may develop as a result of H. pylori eradication. AIM: To determine the relationship between symptoms and H. pylori eradication and to determine whether H. pylori eradication results in symptoms or endoscopic findings of GERD. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-two patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer disease and evidence of H. pylori infection by rapid urease testing and histology were studied in four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of H. pylori eradication therapy. All patients underwent symptom assessment and endoscopy with biopsy before therapy and 1 and 6 months after completing therapy. The rapid urease test and histology were used to determine H. pylori status. Interviewers were blinded to H. pylori status after eradication and were unaware of the endoscopic findings (interviews were performed prior to repeat endoscopy). RESULTS: The presence of epigastric pain was significantly associated with persistent H. pylori infection 1 month after therapy (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI: 1.02-5.2; P=0.041), as was nausea (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 0.93-55.6; P=0.029). The presence of epigastric pain was significantly associated with ulcer relapse at 6 months (OR 7.5, 95% CI: 3.6-15.7; P < 0.001) as was nausea (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 1.7-16.0; P=0.002). Heartburn was not associated with eradication of H. pylori or ulcer relapse. New onset reflux symptoms were reported by 17% (17 of 101 patients) at 6 months and were not significantly different in patients with (15%) and without (22%) persistent H. pylori infection (P=0.47). Erosive oesophagitis was present at endoscopy in one of the 17 cases that developed new heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: One month after completion of therapy, the presence of epigastric pain or nausea is associated with persistent infection and these symptoms at 6 months are suggestive of duodenal ulcer relapse. The incidence of GERD is not increased in patients who have eradication of H. pylori.