The effect of transport on quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

IntroductionMost manikin and clinical studies have found decreased quality of CPR during transport to hospital. We wanted to study quality of CPR before and during transport for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and also whether quality of CPR before initiation of transport was different from the quality in patients only receiving CPR on scene.Materials and methodsQuality of CPR was prospectively registered with a modified defibrillator for consecutive cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in three ambulance services during 2002–2005. Ventilations were registered via changes in transthoracic impedance and chest compressions were measured with an extra chest compression pad placed on the patients’ sternum. Paired t-tests were used to analyse quality of CPR before vs. during transport with ongoing CPR. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare CPR quality prior to transport to CPR quality in patients with CPR terminated on site.ResultsQuality of CPR did not deteriorate during transport, but as previously reported overall quality of CPR was substandard. Quality of CPR performed on site was significantly better when transport was not initiated with ongoing CPR compared to episodes with initiation of transport during CPR: fraction of time without chest compressions was 0.45 and 0.53 (p < 0.001), compression depth 37 mm and 34 mm (p = 0.04), and number of chest compressions per minute 61 and 56 (p = 0.01), respectively.ConclusionCPR quality was sub-standard both before and during transport. Early decision to transport might have negatively affected CPR quality from the early stages of resuscitation.     

Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins

AimsThe adequate chest compression rate during CPR is associated with improved haemodynamics and primary survival. To explore whether the use of a metronome would affect also chest compression depth beside the rate, we evaluated CPR quality using a metronome in a simulated CPR scenario.MethodsForty-four experienced intensive care unit nurses participated in two-rescuer basic life support given to manikins in 10 min scenarios. The target chest compression to ventilation ratio was 30:2 performed with bag and mask ventilation. The rescuer performing the compressions was changed every 2 min. CPR was performed first without and then with a metronome that beeped 100 times per minute. The quality of CPR was analysed with manikin software. The effect of rescuer fatigue on CPR quality was analysed separately.ResultsThe mean compression rate between ventilation pauses was 137 ± 18 compressions per minute (cpm) without and 98 ± 2 cpm with metronome guidance (p < 0.001). The mean number of chest compressions actually performed was 104 ± 12 cpm without and 79 ± 3 cpm with the metronome (p < 0.001). The mean compression depth during the scenario was 46.9 ± 7.7 mm without and 43.2 ± 6.3 mm with metronome guidance (p = 0.09). The total number of chest compressions performed was 1022 without metronome guidance, 42% at the correct depth; and 780 with metronome guidance, 61% at the correct depth (p = 0.09 for difference for percentage of compression with correct depth).ConclusionsMetronome guidance corrected chest compression rates for each compression cycle to within guideline recommendations, but did not affect chest compression quality or rescuer fatigue.     

An investigation of thrust,depth and the impedance cardiogram as measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efficacy in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

ObjectiveOptimising the depth and rate of applied chest compressions following out of hospital cardiac arrest is crucial in maintaining end organ perfusion and improving survival. The impedance cardiogram (ICG) measured via defibrillator pads produces a characteristic waveform during chest compressions with the potential to provide feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and enhance performance. The objective of this pre-clinical study was to investigate the relationship between mechanical and physiological markers of CPR efficacy in a porcine model and examine the strength of correlation between the ICG amplitude, compression depth and end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂).MethodsTwo experiments were performed using 24 swine (12 per experiment). For experiment 1, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced and mechanical CPR commenced at varying thrusts (0–60 kg) for 2 min intervals. Chest compression depth was recorded using a Philips QCPR device with additional recording of invasive physiological parameters: systolic blood pressure, ETCO2, cardiac output and carotid flow. For experiment 2, VF was induced and mechanical CPR commenced at varying depths (0–5 cm) for 2 min intervals. The ICG was recorded via defibrillator pads attached to the animal's sternum and connected to a Heartsine 500P defibrillator. ICG amplitude, chest compression depth, systolic blood pressure and ETCO₂ were recorded during each cycle. In both experiments the within-animal correlation between the measured parameters was assessed using a mixed effect model.ResultsIn experiment 1 moderate within-animal correlations were observed between physiological parameters and compression depth (r = 0.69–0.77) and thrust (r = 0.66–0.82). A moderate correlation was observed between compression depth and thrust (r = 0.75). In experiment 2 a strong within-animal correlation and moderate overall correlations were observed between ICG amplitude and compression depth (r = 0.89, r = 0.79) and ETCO₂ (r = 0.85, r = 0.64).ConclusionIn this porcine model of induced cardiac arrest moderate within animal correlations were observed between mechanical and physiological markers of chest compression efficacy demonstrating the challenge in utilising a single mechanical metric to quantify chest compression efficacy. ICG amplitude demonstrated strong within animal correlations with compression depth and ETCO₂ suggesting its potential utility to provide CPR feedback in the out of hospital setting to improve performance.     

Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of 1-h practical chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with or without a preparatory self-learning video.MethodsParticipants were randomly assigned to either a control group or a video group who received a self-learning video before attending the 1-h chest compression-only CPR training program. The primary outcome measure was the total number of chest compressions during a 2-min test period.Results214 participants were enrolled, 183 of whom completed this study. In a simulation test just before practical training began, 88 (92.6%) of the video group attempted chest compressions, while only 58 (64.4%) of the control group (p < 0.001) did so. The total number of chest compressions was significantly greater in the video group than in the control group (100.5 ± 61.5 versus 74.4 ± 55.5, p = 0.012). The proportion of those who attempted to use an automated external defibrillator (AED) was significantly greater in the video group (74.7% versus 28.7%, p < 0.001). After the 1-h practical training, the number of total chest compressions markedly increased regardless of the type of CPR training program and inter-group differences had almost disappeared (161.0 ± 31.8 in the video group and 159.0 ± 35.7 in the control group, p = 0.628).Conclusions1-h chest compression-only CPR training makes it possible for the general public to perform satisfactory chest compressions. Although a self-learning video encouraged people to perform CPR, their performance levels were not sufficient, confirming that practical training as well is essential. (UMIN000001046).     

Force and depth of mechanical chest compressions and their relation to chest height and gender in an out-of-hospital setting

IntroductionThe LUCAS 2 device stores technical data that documents the chest compression process. We analyzed chest wall dimensions and mechanics stored during chest compressions on humans using data gathered with the LUCAS 2 device.MethodsData from LUCAS 2 devices used in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were downloaded with dedicated proprietary software and matched to the corresponding patient data. Cases were included only if the suction cup was placed correctly, if it was not realigned during the first 5 min of chest compressions, and if no other anomaly in device use was noted. Trauma cases were excluded.ResultsNinety-five patients were included. All patients received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to the application of the device. The mean (SD) chest height was 232 (25) mm for males and 209 (26) mm for females (P < 0.001). The mean (min–max) compression depth in patients with chest height >185 mm was 53 (50–55) mm, corresponding with 19–28% of the chest diameter. The mean force required to achieve the compression depth of 53 mm ranged between 219 and 568 N. No correlation was found between chest height and force to reach 53 mm depth (females: R² = 0.001, males: R² = 0.007).ConclusionThere was a large variation of the required force to achieve a compression depth of 53 mm. No correlation was seen between chest height and maximum force required to compress the chest 53 mm.     

The impact of compliant surfaces on in-hospital chest compressions: Effects of common mattresses and a backboard

PurposeTo evaluate, in a hospital setting, the influence of different, common mattresses, with and without a backboard, on chest movement during CPR.Design and settingSixty CPR sessions (140 s each, 30:2, C:R ratio 1:1) were performed using a manikin on standard hospital mattresses, with or without a backboard in combination with variable weights. Sternum-to-spine compression distance was controlled (range 30–60 mm) allowing evaluation of the underlying compliant surface on total hand travel.ResultsMovement of the caregiver's hands was significantly larger (up to 111 mm at 50 mm compression depth, p < 0.0001) when sternum-to-spine compressions were performed without a backboard than with one. The extent of this variable extra travel effect depended on the type of mattress as well as the force of compression. Foam mattresses and air chamber systems act as springs and follow hand movement, while ‘slow foam’ mattresses incorporate time delays, making depth and force sensing harder. A backboard decreases the extra hand movement due to mattress effects by more than 50%, strongly reducing caregiver work.ConclusionsTotal vertical hand movement is significantly, and clinically relevantly, much larger than sternum-to-spine compression depth when CPR is performed on a mattress. Additional movement depends on the type of mattress and can be strongly reduced, but not eliminated, when a backboard is applied. The additional motion and increased work load adds extra complexity to in-hospital CPR. We propose that this should be taken into account during training by in-hospital caregivers.     

Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression–decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin model

ObjectiveWe developed an adhesive glove device (AGD) to perform ACD-CPR in pediatric manikins, hypothesizing that AGD-ACD-CPR provides better chest decompression compared to standard (S)-CPR.DesignSplit-plot design randomizing 16 subjects to test four manikin-technique models in a crossover fashion to AGD-ACD-CPR vs. S-CPR. Healthcare providers performed 5 min of CPR with 30:2 compression:ventilation ratio in the four manikin models: (1) adolescent; (2) child two-hand; (3) child one-hand; and (4) infant two-thumb.MethodsModified manikins recorded compression pressure (CP), compression depth (CD) and decompression depth (DD). The AGD consisted of a modified oven mitt with an adjustable strap; a Velcro patch was sewn to the palmer aspect. The counter Velcro patch was bonded to the anterior chest wall. For infant CPR, the thumbs of two oven mitts were stitched together with Velcro. Subjects were asked to actively pull up during decompression. Subjects’ heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and recovery time (RT) for HR/RR to return to baseline were recorded. Subjects were blinded to data recordings. Data (mean ± SEM) were analyzed using a two-tailed paired t-test. Significance was defined qualitatively as P ≤ 0.05.ResultsMean decompression depth difference was significantly greater with AGD-ACD-CPR compared to S-CPR; 38–75% of subjects achieved chest decompression to or beyond baseline. AGD-ACD-CPR provided 6–12% fewer chest compressions/minute than S-CPR group. There was no significant difference in CD, CP, HR, RR and RT within each group comparing both techniques.ConclusionA simple, inexpensive glove device for ACD-CPR improved chest decompression with emphasis on active pull in manikins without excessive rescuer fatigue. The clinical implication of fewer compressions/minute in the AGD group needs to be evaluated.     

Advanced life support performance with manual and mechanical chest compressions in a randomized,multicentre manikin study

Aim of the studyClinical mechanical chest compression studies report diverging outcomes. Confounding effects of variability in hands-off fraction (HOF) and timing of necessary tasks during advanced life support (ALS) may contribute to this divergence. Study site variability in these factors coupled to randomization of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) method was studied during simulated cardiac arrest prior to a multicentre clinical trial.MethodAmbulance personnel from four sites were tested in randomized, simulated cardiac arrest scenarios with manual CPR or load-distributing band CPR (LDB-CPR) on manikins. Primary emphasis was on HOF and time spent before necessary predefined ALS task (ALS milestones). Results are presented as mean differences (confidence interval).ResultsAt the site with lowest HOF during manual CPR, HOF deteriorated with LDB-CPR by 0.06 (0.005, 0.118, p = 0.04), while it improved at the two sites with highest HOF during manual CPR by 0.07 (0.019, 0.112, p = 0.007) and 0.08 (0.004, 0.165, p = 0.042). Initial defibrillation was 29 (3, 55, p = 0.032) s delayed for LDB-CPR vs. manual CPR. Other ALS milestones trended toward earlier completion with LDB-CPR; only significant for intravenous access, mean difference 70 (24, 115, p = 0.003) s.ConclusionIn this manikin study, HOF for manual vs. mechanical chest compressions varied between sites. Study protocol implementation should be simulation tested before launching multicentre trials, to optimize performance and improve reliability and scientific interpretation.     

Effect of implementation of new resuscitation guidelines on quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival

BackgroundDuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), advanced life support (ALS) providers have been shown to deliver inadequate CPR with long intervals without chest compressions. Several changes made to the 2005 CPR Guidelines were intended to reduce unnecessary interruptions. We have evaluated if quality of CPR performed by the Oslo Emergency Medical System (EMS) improved after implementation of the modified 2005 CPR Guidelines, and if any such improvement would result in increased survival.Materials and methodsRetrospective, observational study of all consecutive adult cardiac arrest patients treated during a 2-year period before (May 2003–April 2005), and after (January 2006–December 2007) implementation of the modified 2005 CPR Guidelines. CPR quality was assessed from continuous electronic recordings from LIFEPACK 12 defibrillators where ventilations and chest compressions were identified from transthoracic impedance changes. Ambulance run sheets, Utstein forms and hospital records were collected and outcome evaluated.ResultsResuscitation was attempted in 435 patients before and 481 patients after implementation of the modified 2005 CPR Guidelines. ECGs usable for CPR quality evaluation were obtained in 64% and 76% of the cases, respectively. Pre-shock pauses decreased from median (interquartile range) 17 s (11, 22) to 5 s (2, 17) (p = 0.000), overall hands-off ratios from 0.23 ± 0.13 to 0.14 ± 0.09 (p = 0.000), compression rates from 120 ± 9 to 115 ± 10 (p = 0.000) and ventilation rates from 12 ± 4 to 10 ± 4 (p = 0.000). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 11% and 13% (p = 0.287), respectively.ConclusionQuality of CPR improved after implementation of the modified 2005 Guidelines with only a weak trend towards improved survival to hospital discharge.     

The impact of quantitative feedback on the performance of chest compression by basic life support trained clinical staff

BackgroundThe quality of CPR is directly related to survival outcomes following sudden cardiac arrest but, CPR competency amongst nursing and medical staff is generally poor. The skills honed in CPR recertification training rapidly decline in quality, even as soon as eight weeks following the training. High frequency low dose training has been recommended to address this decay in skills. Automated training devices that provide feedback may be useful in conducting low dose training, which would assist hospitals to manage the often logistically difficult, and financially costly exercise of conducting training programs. Little evidence is published about the improvement in skills performance that can be derived from isolated feedback from these training devices.ObjectivesTo investigate whether the feedback from an automated training device can produce performance in a ‘low dose’ episode of re-training on chest compressions and compression depth for CPR.MethodsA repeated measures study was conducted assessing the compression rate and depth quality over 2 min using a Laerdal QCPR® simulation manikin capable of recording performance data. On-screen feedback was provided to participants between attempts. Convenience sampling recruited undergraduate and qualified nursing and medical staff who were engaged in a CPR recertification program at a major Australian private hospital.ResultsIn total, 150 participants were enrolled. Feedback from the automated training device was sufficient to produce a significant improvement in both chest compression rate (95% CI 13.3 to 19.7; p < 0.001) and depth (95% CI 5.9 to 9.7; p < 0.001) during the low dose training episode.ConclusionsThe feedback provided from an automated training device was sufficient to produce an improvement in performance in chest compressions in CPR. This demonstrates an alternate staff training model that could improve patient outcomes, and allow for higher frequency training whilst potentially reducing costs and the logistical problems many medical institutions face with staff training.     

Dispatcher assisted CPR: Is it still important to continue teaching lay bystander CPR?

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare on manikin chest compressions only CPR performance carried out by untrained volunteers following Dispatcher assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DACPR), and then by the same trained volunteers immediately after chest compressions only CPR course and 4 months after the CPR course.

The effects of music on the cardiac resuscitation education of nursing students

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the effects of music on the appropriate performance of the rate and depth of chest compression for nursing students.MethodsThis randomized controlled study was conducted in the School of Nursing in Turkey between November 2014 and January 2015. The study’s participants were second-year nursing school students with no previous formal cardiac resuscitation training (n = 77). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: an intervention group with music and a control group without music. During practical training, the intervention group performed chest compressions with music. The outcomes of this study were collected twice. The first evaluation was conducted one day after CPR education, and the second evaluation was conducted six weeks after the initial training.ResultsThe first evaluation shows that the participants in the intervention group had an average rate of 107.33 ± 7.29 chest compressions per minute, whereas the rate for the control group was 121.47 ± 12.91. The second evaluation shows that the rates of chest compression for the intervention and control groups were 106.24 ± 8.72 and 100.71 ± 9.54, respectively.ConclusionThe results of this study show that a musical piece enables students to remember the ideal rhythm for chest compression. Performing chest compression with music can easily be integrated into CPR education because it does not require additional technology and is cheap.     

Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents

Appropriate chest compression (CC) depth is associated with improved CPR outcome. CCs provided in hospital are often conducted on a compliant mattress. The objective was to quantify the effect of mattress compression on the assessment of CPR quality in children.MethodsA force and deflection sensor (FDS) was used during CPR in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department of a children's hospital. The sensor was interposed between the chest of the patient and hands of the rescuer and measured CC depth. Following CPR event, each event was reconstructed with a manikin and an identical mattress/backboard/patient configuration. CCs were performed using FDS on the sternum and a reference accelerometer attached to the spine of the manikin, providing a means to calculate the mattress deflection.ResultsTwelve CPR events with 14,487 CC (11 patients, median age 14.9 years) were recorded and reconstructed: 9 on ICU beds (9296 CC), 3 on stretchers (5191 CC). Measured mean CC depth during CPR was 47 ± 8 mm on ICU beds, and 45 ± 7 mm on stretcher beds with overestimation of 13 ± 4 mm and 4 ± 1 mm, respectively, due to mattress compression. After adjusting for this, the proportion of CC that met the CPR guidelines decreased from 88.4 to 31.8% on ICU beds (p < 0.001), and 86.3 to 64.7% on stretcher (p < 0.001). The proportion of appropriate depth CC was significantly smaller on ICU beds (p < 0.001).ConclusionCC conducted on a non-rigid surface may not be deep enough. FDS may overestimate CC depth by 28% on ICU beds, and 10% on stretcher beds.     

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and patient survival outcome in cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality, as indicated by parameters such as chest compression depth, compression rate and compression fraction, is associated with patient survival from cardiac arrest.MethodsFive databases were searched (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane) as well as the grey literature (MedNar). To satisfy inclusion criteria, studies had to document human cases of in- or out-of hospital cardiac arrest where CPR quality had been recorded using an automated device and linked to patient survival. Where indicated (I² < 75%), meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the relationship between individual CPR quality parameters and either survival to hospital discharge (STHD) or return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).ResultsDatabase searching yielded 8,842 unique citations, resulting in the inclusion of 22 relevant articles. Thirteen were included in the meta-analysis. Chest compression depth was significantly associated with STHD (mean difference (MD) between survivors and non-survivors 2.59 mm, 95% CI: 0.71, 4.47); and with ROSC (MD 0.99 mm, 95% CI: 0.04, 1.93). Within the range of approximately 100–120 compressions per minute (cpm), compression rate was significantly associated with STHD; survivors demonstrated a lower mean compression rate than non-survivors (MD −1.17 cpm, 95% CI: −2.21, −0.14). Compression fraction could not be examined by meta-analysis due to high heterogeneity, however a higher fraction appeared to be associated with survival in cases with a shockable initial rhythm.ConclusionsChest compression depth and rate were associated with survival outcomes. More studies with consistent reporting of data are required for other quality parameters.     

Effectiveness of simplified 15-min refresher BLS training program: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesTo evaluate the long-term effectiveness of 15-min refresher basic life support (BLS) training following 45-min chest compression-only BLS training.MethodsAfter the 45-min chest compression-only BLS training, the participants were randomly assigned to either the refresher BLS training group, which received a 15-min refresher training 6 months after the initial training (refresher training group), or to the control group, which did not receive refresher training. Participants’ resuscitation skills were evaluated by a 2-min case-based scenario test 1 year after the initial training. The primary outcome measure was the number of appropriate chest compressions during a 2-min test period.Results140 participants were enrolled and 112 of them completed this study. The number of appropriate chest compressions performed during the 2-min test period was significantly greater in the refresher training group (68.9 ± 72.3) than in the control group (36.3 ± 50.8, p = 0.009). Time without chest compressions was significantly shorter in the refresher training group (16.1 ± 2.1 s versus 26.9 ± 3.7 s, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in time to chest compression (29.6 ± 16.7 s versus 34.4 ± 17.8 s, p = 0.172) and AED use between the groups.ConclusionsA short-time refresher BLS training program 6 months after the initial training can help trainees retain chest compression skills for up to 1 year. Repeated BLS training, even if very short, would be adopted to keep acquired CPR quality optimal (UMIN-CTR UMIN 000004101).     

The capability of professional- and lay-rescuers to estimate the chest compression-depth target: A short,randomized experiment

BackgroundIn CPR, sufficient compression depth is essential. The American Heart Association (“at least 5 cm”, AHA-R) and the European Resuscitation Council (“at least 5 cm, but not to exceed 6 cm”, ERC-R) recommendations differ, and both are hardly achieved. This study aims to investigate the effects of differing target depth instructions on compression depth performances of professional and lay-rescuers.Methods110 professional-rescuers and 110 lay-rescuers were randomized (1:1, 4 groups) to estimate the AHA-R or ERC-R on a paper sheet (given horizontal axis) using a pencil and to perform chest compressions according to AHA-R or ERC-R on a manikin. Distance estimation and compression depth were the outcome variables.ResultsProfessional-rescuers estimated the distance according to AHA-R in 19/55 (34.5%) and to ERC-R in 20/55 (36.4%) cases (p = 0.84). Professional-rescuers achieved correct compression depth according to AHA-R in 39/55 (70.9%) and to ERC-R in 36/55 (65.4%) cases (p = 0.97).Lay-rescuers estimated the distance correctly according to AHA-R in 18/55 (32.7%) and to ERC-R in 20/55 (36.4%) cases (p = 0.59). Lay-rescuers yielded correct compression depth according to AHA-R in 39/55 (70.9%) and to ERC-R in 26/55 (47.3%) cases (p = 0.02).ConclusionProfessional and lay-rescuers have severe difficulties in correctly estimating distance on a sheet of paper. Professional-rescuers are able to yield AHA-R and ERC-R targets likewise. In lay-rescuers AHA-R was associated with significantly higher success rates. The inability to estimate distance could explain the failure to appropriately perform chest compressions. For teaching lay-rescuers, the AHA-R with no upper limit of compression depth might be preferable.     

Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback,Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role

AimMany healthcare providers rely on visual perception to guide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but little is known about the accuracy of provider perceptions of CPR quality. We aimed to describe the difference between perceived versus measured CPR quality, and to determine the impact of provider role, real-time visual CPR feedback and Just-in-Time (JIT) CPR training on provider perceptions.MethodsWe conducted secondary analyses of data collected from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 324 healthcare providers who participated in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario between July 2012 and April 2014. Participants were randomized to one of four permutations of: JIT CPR training and real-time visual CPR feedback. We calculated the difference between perceived and measured quality of CPR and reported the proportion of subjects accurately estimating the quality of CPR within each study arm.ResultsParticipants overestimated achieving adequate chest compression depth (mean difference range: 16.1–60.6%) and rate (range: 0.2–51%), and underestimated chest compression fraction (0.2–2.9%) across all arms. Compared to no intervention, the use of real-time feedback and JIT CPR training (alone or in combination) improved perception of depth (p < 0.001). Accurate estimation of CPR quality was poor for chest compression depth (0–13%), rate (5–46%) and chest compression fraction (60–63%). Perception of depth is more accurate in CPR providers versus team leaders (27.8% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.043) when using real-time feedback.ConclusionHealthcare providers’ visual perception of CPR quality is poor. Perceptions of CPR depth are improved by using real-time visual feedback and with prior JIT CPR training.     

“Rolling Refreshers”: A novel approach to maintain CPR psychomotor skill competence

ObjectivesHigh quality CPR skill retention is poor. We hypothesized that “just-in-time” and “just-in-place” training programs would be effective and well-accepted to maintain CPR skills among PICU staff.Methods“Rolling Refreshers”, a portable manikin/defibrillator system with chest compression sensor providing automated corrective feedback to optimize CPR skills, were conducted daily in the PICU with multidisciplinary healthcare providers. Providers practiced CPR until skill success was attained, prospectively defined as <3 corrective prompts within 30 s targeting chest compression (CC) rate 90–120/min, CC depth >38 mm during continuous CPR. Providers completing ≥2 refreshers/month (Frequent Refreshers [FR]) were compared to providers completing <2 refreshers/month (Infrequent Refreshers [IR]) for time to achieve CPR skill success. Univariate analysis performed using non-parametric methods. Following actual cardiac arrests, CPR providers were surveyed for subjective feedback on training approach efficacy (5-point Likert scale; 1 = poor to 5 = excellent).ResultsOver 15 weeks, 420 PICU staff were “refreshed”: 340 nurses, 34 physicians, 46 respiratory therapists. A consecutive sample of 20 PICU staff was assessed before subsequent refresher sessions (FREQ n = 10, INFREQ n = 10). Time to achieve CPR skill success was significantly less in FREQ (median 21 s, IQR: 15.75–30 s) than in INFREQ (median 67 s, IQR: 41.5–84 s; p < 0.001). Following actual resuscitations, CPR providers (n = 9) rated “Rolling Refresher” training as effective (mean = 4.2; Likert scale 1–5; standard deviation 0.67).ConclusionsA novel “Rolling Refresher” CPR skill training approach using “just-in-time” and “just-in-place” simulation is effective and well received by PICU staff. More frequent refreshers resulted in significantly shorter times to achieve proficient CPR skills.     

Quantitative analysis of chest compression interruptions during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents

AimTo quantitatively describe pauses in chest compression (CC) delivery during resuscitation from in-hospital pediatric and adolescent cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that CPR error will be more likely after a chest compression provider change compared to other causes for pauses.MethodsCPR recording/feedback defibrillators were used to evaluate CPR quality for victims ≥8 years who received CPR in the PICU/ED. Audiovisual feedback was supplied in accordance with AHA targets. Etiology of CC pauses identified by post-event debriefing/reviews of stored CPR quality data.ResultsAnalysis yielded 205 pauses during 304.8 min of CPR from 20 consecutive cardiac arrests. Etiologies were: 57.1% for provider switch; 23.9% for pulse/rhythm analysis; 4.4% for defibrillation; and 14.6% “other.” Provider switch accounted for 41.2% of no-flow duration. Compared to other causes, CPR epochs following pauses due to provider switch were more likely to have measurable residual leaning (OR: 5.52; CI⁹⁵: 2.94, 10.32; p < 0.001) and were shallower (43 ± 8 vs. 46 ± 7 mm; mean difference: ?2.42 mm; CI⁹⁵: ?4.71, ?0.13; p = 0.04). Individuals performing continuous CPR ≥ 120 s as compared to those switching earlier performed deeper chest compressions (42 ± 6 vs. 38 ± 7 mm; mean difference: 4.44 mm; CI⁹⁵: 2.39, 6.49; p < 0.001) and were more compliant with guideline depth recommendations (OR: 5.11; CI⁹⁵: 1.67, 15.66; p = 0.004).ConclusionsProvider switches account for a significant portion of no-flow time. Measurable residual leaning is more likely after provider switch. Feedback systems may allow some providers to continue high quality CPR past the recommended switch time of 2 min during in-hospital resuscitation attempts.