Uninsurance,Underinsurance, and Health Care Utilization in Mexico by US Border Residents

Using data from the 2008 Cross-Border Utilization of Health Care Survey, we examined the relationship between United States (US) health insurance coverage plans and the use of health care services in Mexico by US residents of the US-Mexico border region. We found immigrants were far more likely to be uninsured than their native-born counterparts (63 vs. 27.8 %). Adults without health insurance coverage were more likely to purchase medications or visit physicians in Mexico compared to insured adults. However, adults with Medicaid coverage were more likely to visit dentists in Mexico compared to uninsured adults. Improving health care access for US residents in the southwestern border region of the country will require initiatives that target not only providing coverage to the large uninsured population but also improving access to health care services for the large underinsured population.     

Children's ability to access and use health care

Under new regulations for Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), states can extend health insurance to child enrollees' uninsured parents. We compared the extent to which child-only and family coverage (child and parent insured) ensure health care access and use for children in working-poor families. Among these children, 21 percent were uninsured, as were 30 percent of their parents. Children with no family coverage encountered more access barriers than insured children. Extending insurance to children markedly increases access and use. The additional benefits of family coverage over child-only coverage seem less pronounced, but family coverage expansions may narrow disparities in access.     

Children’s Receipt of Health Care Services and Family Health Insurance Patterns

PURPOSE Insured children in the United States have better access to health care services; less is known about how parental coverage affects children’s access to care. We examined the association between parent-child health insurance coverage patterns and children’s access to health care and preventive counseling services.METHODS We conducted secondary analyses of nationally representative, cross-sectional, pooled 2002–2006 data from children (n = 43,509), aged 2 to 17 years, in households responding to the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). We assessed 9 outcome measures pertaining to children’s unmet health care and preventive counseling needs.RESULTS Cross-sectionally, among US children (aged 2 to 17 years) living with at least 1 parent, 73.6% were insured with insured parents, 8.0% were uninsured with uninsured parents, and the remaining 18.4% had discordant family insurance coverage patterns. In multivariable analyses, insured children with uninsured parents had higher odds of an insurance coverage gap (odds ratio [OR] = 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02–2.97), no usual source of care (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10–1.56), unmet health care needs (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01–1.22), and having never received at least 1 preventive counseling service (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04–1.39) when compared with insured children with insured parents. Insured children with mixed parental insurance coverage had similar vulnerabilities.CONCLUSIONS Uninsured children had the highest rates of unmet needs overall, with fewer differences based on parental insurance status. For insured children, having uninsured parents was associated with higher odds of going without necessary services when compared with having insured parents.     

Where Would You Rather Live If You Were Insured? Assessing Community Uninsurance Spillover Effects on the Insured

This study sought to understand the cost, quality of, and access to health care for the insured population in the context of spillover effects resulting from community-level uninsurance. We examined the health care access, quality, and cost experienced by insured Latina mothers in two communities, Minneapolis, Minnesota and McAllen, Texas. These communities differ substantially by the size of the local population without health insurance coverage. Four focus groups were conducted with insured Latina mothers who were caring for at least one child in their household. Eleven and thirteen mothers participated in each community, respectively. The experiences of the insured population in McAllen were substantially different from the experiences of the insured population in Minneapolis. The perceptions of health care quality and access by insured Latina mothers were substantially lower in McAllen while out-of-pocket costs were perceived to be higher in Minneapolis. Our study provides key insights about the US health care system and the role that the relative size of the local uninsured population may have in impacting the health care experiences of the insured. Health insurance coverage rates are expected to increase substantially across US communities within the next few years but local health care system challenges related to cost, quality, and access will remain for both the insured and the uninsured.     

Health service access, use, and insurance coverage among American Indians/Alaska Natives and Whites: what role does the Indian Health Service play?

OBJECTIVES: We compared access and utilization of health services among American Indians/Alaska Natives (AIANs) with that among non-Hispanic Whites. METHODS: We used data from the 1997 and 1999 National Survey of America's Families to estimate odds ratios for several measures of access and utilization and the effects of Indian Health Service (IHS) coverage. RESULTS: AIANs had less insurance coverage and worse access and utilization than Whites. Over half of low-income uninsured AIANs did not have access to the IHS. However, among the low-income population, AIANs with only IHS access fared better than uninsured AIANs and as well as insured Whites for key measures but received less preventive care. CONCLUSIONS: The IHS partially offsets lack of insurance for some uninsured AIANs, but important needs were potentially unmet.     

Continuity of Health Insurance Coverage for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Objectives: To assess the continuity of health insurance coverage and its associated factors for children with special health care needs (CSHCN). Methods: Logistic regression and proportional hazard models were estimated on monthly insurance enrollment for 5594 children in the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. CSHCN were identified using a non-categorical approach. Stratified analyses were conducted to determine whether any characteristics differentiated the effects of CSHCN status on children's coverage. Results: In 1996, more than 8% of CSHCN were uninsured for the entire year. For those who were insured in January 1996, 14% lost their coverage by December 1996. CSHCN were more likely than other children to be insured (92% vs. 89%), mainly due to their better access to public insurance (35% vs. 23%). Conversely, CSHCN were less likely than other children to stay insured if they were school-aged, non-Hispanic White, from working, low-income families or the US Midwest region. Higher parental education improved health insurance enrollment for CSHCN, whereas higher family income or having activity limitations protected them from losing coverage. Regardless of CSHCN status, being publicly insured was associated with a higher risk of losing coverage for children. Conclusions: Despite increased health care needs, a considerable proportion of CSHCN is unable to access or maintain coverage. Compared to other children, CSHCN are more likely to have coverage but no more likely to stay insured. Improving continuity of coverage for publicly insured children is needed, especially CSHCN who are more likely to obtain their coverage through public programs.     

Type of health insurance and the quality of primary care experience

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between type of health insurance coverage and quality of primary care as measured by its distinguishing attributes--first contact, longitudinality, comprehensiveness, and coordination. METHODS: The household component of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was used for this study. The analysis primarily focused on subjects aged younger than 65 years who identified a usual source of care. Logistic regressions were used to examine the independent effects of insurance status on primary care attributes while individual sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for. RESULTS: The experience of primary care varies according to insurance status. The insured are able to obtain better primary care than the uninsured, and the privately insured are able to obtain better primary care than the publicly insured. Those insured through fee-for-service coverage experience better longitudinal care and less of a barrier to access than those insured through health maintenance organizations (HMOs). CONCLUSIONS: While expanding insurance coverage is important for establishing access to care, efforts are needed to enhance the quality of primary health care, particularly for the publicly insured. Policymakers should closely monitor the quality of primary care provided by HMOs.     

Changes in Insurance Status and Access to Care in an Integrated Safety Net Healthcare System

This paper focuses on a cohort of uninsured patients that have accessed outpatient healthcare services in an urban safety net, evaluating the degree to which they switch insurance status and the impact this switching has on access to care. The results indicate that in an integrated safety net system, there is a high frequency of insurance status switching by the uninsured. Uninsured patients who switch to insured status were found to be more likely to visit specialty points of care and less likely to visit urgent points of care than the continuously uninsured. It is well documented that insurance coverage and continuity of care influence health status. Continuity of insurance coverage also has an impact on access to care for those receiving services within a safety net healthcare system.     

The impact of race,income, drug abuse and dependence on health insurance coverage among US adults

Little is known about the impact of drug abuse/dependence on health insurance coverage, especially by race groups and income levels. In this study, we examine the disparities in health insurance predictors and investigate the impact of drug use (alcohol abuse/dependence, nicotine dependence, and illicit drug abuse/dependence) on lack of insurance across different race and income groups. To perform the analysis, we used insurance data (8057 uninsured and 28,590 insured individual adults) from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH 2011). To analyze the likelihood of being uninsured we performed weighted binomial logistic regression analyses. The results show that the overall prevalence of lacking insurance was 19.6 %. However, race differences in lack of insurance exist, especially for Hispanics who observe the highest probability of being uninsured (38.5 %). Furthermore, we observe that the lowest income level bracket (annual income <$20,000) is associated with the highest likelihood of being uninsured (37.3 %). As the result of this investigation, we observed the following relationship between drug use and lack of insurance: alcohol abuse/dependence and nicotine dependence tend to increase the risk of lack of insurance for African Americans and whites, respectively; illicit drug use increases such risk for whites; alcohol abuse/dependence increases the likelihood of lack of insurance for the group with incomes $20,000–$49,999, whereas nicotine dependence is associated with higher probability of lack of insurance for most income groups. These findings provide some useful insights for policy makers in making decisions regarding unmet health insurance coverage.     

Insurance coverage and access: implications for health policy.

Data are presented from a recent survey of the United States population comparing the characteristics and levels of access to medical care of persons under 65 years who have group or individual private health insurance, public health insurance, or no third-party coverage. The uninsured group appeared to fall between the privately insured and publicly insured groups on measures of social and economic status. Persons with publicly subsidized forms of insurance coverage utilized services at the highest rates, and uninsured persons used them at the lowest rates. Neither of these groups was as satisfied with the convenience or the quality of the care it obtained as the privately insured group. Implications of these findings for national health insurance and other health policy initiatives are discussed.     

Health insurance eroding for working families: employer-provided coverage declines for fifth consecutive year.

In 2005, the percentage of Americans with employer-provided health insurance fell for the fifth year in a row. Workers and their families have been falling into the ranks of the uninsured at alarming rates. The downward trend in employer-provided coverage for children also continued into 2005. In the previous four years, children were less likely to become uninsured as public sector health coverage expanded, but in 2005 the rate of uninsured children increased. While Medicaid and SCHIP still work for many, the government has not picked up coverage for everybody who lost insurance. The weakening of this system-notably for children-is particularly difficult for workers and their families in a time of stagnating incomes. Furthermore, these programs are not designed to prevent low-income adults or middle- or high-income families from becoming uninsured. Government at the federal and state levels has responded to medical inflation with policy changes that reduce public insurance eligibility or with proposals to reduce government costs. Federal policy proposals to lessen the tax advantage of workplace insurance or to encourage a private purchase system could further destabilize the employer-provided system. Now is a critical time to consider health insurance reform. Several promising solutions could increase access to affordable health care. The key is to create large, varied, and stable risk pools.     

Children of working poor families in California: the effects of insurance status on access and utilization of primary health care

We examined the effects of health insurance on access and utilization of health care among children of working poor families. These children experience strong access barriers yet have not been studied systematically. 1,492 children in California under 19 years old who had workforce participating parents and a subset of full-time year round working families earning below 200% of poverty were examined from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey. Thirty-two percent of children of working poor families were uninsured in California compared with 26% nationwide. Difficulties in accessing a regular care source and obtaining after-hour care were markedly higher in California. Full-time year round work did not increase insurance coverage and worsened access to a regular source of care. Uninsured children in California were far more likely than insured children to face access barriers and less likely to see a physician in the previous year. Between privately and publicly insured children, the gap in access and utilization narrowed markedly. Health insurance is critical for children in working poor families. Healthy Families, California's response to CHIP, could improve coverage for this population.     

Children''s Health Insurance Status, Access to and Utilization of Health Services, and Unmet Health Needs in a Rural Alabama School System

PURPOSE: This study examines the relationship between children's health insurance status and utilization of health services, establishment of a medical home, and unmet health needs over a 3-year period (1996-1998) in a rural Alabama K-12 school system. METHODS: As part of a children's health insurance outreach program, questionnaires were administered to parents of 754 children regarding health and health care access. In addition, noninvasive head-to-toe physical assessments of children were conducted on-site at 4 schools. FINDINGS: A relationship between health care utilization and insurance status was observed. Results found that insured children had 1.183 (P < .0115) times the number of medical visits as uninsured children. Among uninsured children, the time since last dental visit was 1.6 (P < .001) times longer than that of insured children. Also, insured children were 5.21 times more likely than uninsured (P < .0001) to report having a medical home. No significant differences between insured and uninsured children were found regarding unmet health needs as measured by referrals made after the children's physical assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Child health coverage is an important determining factor in the ability of families to access and utilize health care services. These findings have implications for populations in similar rural communities across the nation.     

Impact of health insurance status on vaccination coverage in children 19-35 months old, United States, 1993-1996

OBJECTIVES: To show how health insurance (privately and publicly insured, insured and uninsured) relates to vaccination coverage in children 19-35 months old, and how this can be used to better target public health interventions. METHODS: The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) gathers information on the health and health care of the U.S. non-institutionalized population through household interviews. The authors combined immunization and health insurance supplements from the 1993 through 1996 NHIS, and classified children 19-35 months old by their immunization and insurance status. Results were compared using both bivariate and multivariate analyses, and the backwards stepwise selection method was used to build multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Uninsured children tended to have lower vaccination coverage than those who had insurance, either private or public. Among those with insurance, publicly insured children had lower vaccination coverage than privately insured children. Backwards stepwise regression retained insurance status, metropolitan statistical area, and education of responsible adult family member as major predictors of immunization. Factors considered but not retained in the final model included child race/ethnicity, family poverty index, and region of country. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance status was a critical predictor of vaccination coverage for children ages 19-35 months. After controlling for confounders, the uninsured were about 24% less likely to receive all recommended shots than the insured and, among the insured, those with public insurance were about 24% less likely to receive all recommended vaccines than those with private insurance.     

The convergence of vulnerable characteristics and health insurance in the US.

This study defines vulnerability as a multi-dimensional construct, reflected in the convergence of predisposing, enabling, and need attributes of risk. Using race, income, and self-perceived health status as indicators and based on eight rounds of the US 1996 panel of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the study examined how the interactions of these vulnerable characteristics affect insurance coverage, a critical measure of health care access. The results of the study demonstrate insurance coverage does vary with the extent of vulnerability. While race and income significantly influence insurance coverage, respectively, there was relatively little disparity in insurance due to health status. Between race and income, income was a more significant predictor of lack of insurance coverage since low-income people regardless of race and health were significantly more likely to be uninsured or partially insured. However, it is important to note that minorities were disproportionately over-represented in the low-income or bad health groups so that any adverse association between income, bad health, and insurance status would affect minorities significantly more than whites. Among those with insurance, the most vulnerable group, the minority-low-income-bad health group or those with all the three vulnerability indicators, were most likely to be publicly insured. A policy implication is to target limited resources on insurance coverage for the more vulnerable groups, those with a convergence or cluster of predisposing, enabling, and need attributes of risk.     

The role of health insurance in explaining immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to health care: Comparing the United States to Canada

Using a cross-national comparative approach, we examined the influence of health insurance on U.S. immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to primary health care. With data from the 2002/2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health, we gathered evidence using three approaches: 1) we compared health care access among insured and uninsured immigrants and non-immigrants within the U.S.; 2) we contrasted these results with health care access disparities between immigrants and non-immigrants in Canada, a country with universal health care; and 3) we conducted a novel direct comparison of health care access among insured and uninsured U.S. immigrants with Canadian immigrants (all of whom are insured). Outcomes investigated were self-reported unmet medical needs and lack of a regular doctor. Logistic regression models controlled for age, sex, nonwhite status, marital status, education, employment, and self-rated health. In the U.S., odds of unmet medical needs of insured immigrants were similar to those of insured non-immigrants but far greater for uninsured immigrants. The effect of health insurance was even more striking for lack of regular doctor. Within Canada, disparities between immigrants and non-immigrants were similar in magnitude to disparities seen among insured Americans. For both outcomes, direct comparisons of U.S. and Canada revealed significant differences between uninsured American immigrants and Canadian immigrants, but not between insured Americans and Canadians, stratified by nativity. Findings suggest health care insurance is a critical cause of differences between immigrants and non-immigrants in access to primary care, lending robust support for the expansion of health insurance coverage in the U.S. This study also highlights the usefulness of cross-national comparisons for establishing alternative counterfactuals in studies of disparities in health and health care.     

Left out: immigrants' access to health care and insurance

Recent policy changes have limited immigrants' access to insurance and to health care. Fewer noncitizen immigrants and their children (even U.S.-born) have Medicaid or job-based insurance, and many more are uninsured than is the case with native citizens or children of citizens. Noncitizens and their children also have worse access to both regular ambulatory and emergency care, even when insured. Immigration status is an important component of racial and ethnic disparities in insurance coverage and access to care.     

How Well Does Medicaid Work in Improving Access to Care?

OBJECTIVE: To provide an assessment of how well the Medicaid program is working at improving access to and use of health care for low-income mothers. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: The 1997 and 1999 National Survey of America's Families, with state and county information drawn from the Area Resource File and other sources. STUDY DESIGN: Estimate the effects of Medicaid on access and use relative to private coverage and being uninsured, using instrumental variables methods to control for selection into insurance status. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHOD: This study combines data from 1997 and 1999 for mothers in families with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We find that Medicaid beneficiaries' access and use are significantly better than those obtained by the uninsured. Analysis that controls for insurance selection shows that the benefits of having Medicaid coverage versus being uninsured are substantially larger than what is estimated when selection is not accounted for. Our results also indicate that Medicaid beneficiaries' access and use are comparable to that of the low-income privately insured. Once insurance selection is controlled for, access and use under Medicaid is not significantly different from access and use under private insurance. Without controls for insurance selection, access and use for Medicaid beneficiaries is found to be significantly worse than for the low-income privately insured. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the Medicaid program improved access to care relative to uninsurance for low-income mothers, achieving access and use levels comparable to those of the privately insured. Our results also indicate that prior research, which generally has not controlled for selection into insurance coverage, has likely understated the gains of Medicaid relative to uninsurance and overstated the gains of private coverage relative to Medicaid.     

Health insurance coverage of immigrants living in the United States: differences by citizenship status and country of origin

OBJECTIVES: This study examined health insurance coverage among immigrants who are not US citizens and among individuals from the 16 countries with the largest number of immigrants living in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 1998 Current Population Survey, using logistic regression to standardize rates of employer-sponsored coverage by country of origin. RESULTS: In 1997, 16.7 million immigrants were not US citizens. Among non-citizens, 43% of children and 12% of elders lacked health insurance, compared with 14% of non-immigrant children and 1% of non-immigrant elders. Approximately 50% of non-citizen full-time workers had employer-sponsored coverage, compared with 81% of non-immigrant full-time workers. Immigrants from Guatemala, Mexico, El Salvador, Haiti, Korea, and Vietnam were the most likely to be uninsured. Among immigrants who worked full-time, sociodemographic and employment characteristics accounted for most of the variation in employer health insurance. For Central American immigrants, legal status may play a role in high un-insurance rates. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrants who are not US citizens are much less likely to receive employer-sponsored health insurance or government coverage; 44% are uninsured. Ongoing debates on health insurance reform and efforts to improve coverage will need to focus attention on this group.