CD4+CD25+Tr细胞趋化性细胞因子受体表达的生物学意义研究

CD4 CD25 调节性T(Tr)细胞在维持外周自身耐受从而防止自身免疫病的发生、抑制严重的炎症性疾病和下调肿瘤免疫应答中发挥着重要的作用。然而关于它们的免疫抑制机制的分子基础和迁移特性仍不明确。对CD4 CD25 Tr细胞上趋化性细胞因子受体表达的研究将有助于我们更好地了解这群细胞的作用机制。了解CD4 CD25 Tr细胞、趋化性细胞因子、趋化性细胞因子受体和表达于CD4 CD25 Tr细胞上的趋化性细胞因子受体以及它们与不同的抗原提呈细胞(APCs)之间的作用的最新研究进展十分必要。     

Increased inflammation in mice deficient for the chemokine decoy receptor D6

Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines with a key role in the control of cell trafficking and positioning under homeostatic and inflammatory conditions. D6 is a promiscuous 7-transmembrane-domain receptor expressed on lymphatic vessels which recognizes most inflammatory, but not homeostatic, CC chemokines. In vitro experiments demonstrated that D6 is unable to signal after ligand engagement, and it is structurally adapted to sustain rapid and efficient ligand internalization and degradation. These unique functional properties lead to the hypothesis that D6 may be involved in the control of inflammation by acting as a decoy and scavenger receptor for inflammatory chemokines. Consistent with this hypothesis, here we report that D6(-/-) mice showed an anticipated and exacerbated inflammatory response in a model of skin inflammation. Moreover, the absence of D6 resulted in increase cellularity and inflammatory-chemokine levels in draining lymph nodes. Thus, D6 is a decoy receptor structurally adapted and strategically located to tune tissue inflammation and control transfer of inflammatory chemokines to draining lymph nodes.     

Negative regulatory receptors of the IL-1 family

The IL-1 family of ligands and receptors has a central role in both innate and adaptive immune responses and is tightly controlled by antagonists, decoy receptors, scavengers, dominant negative molecules, miRNAs and other mechanisms, acting extracellularly or intracellularly. During evolution, the development of multiple mechanisms of negative regulation reveals the need for tight control of the biological consequences of IL-1 family ligands in order to balance local and systemic inflammation and limit immunopathology. Indeed, studies with gene targeted mice for negative regulators and genetic studies in humans provide evidence for their non-redundant role in controlling inflammation, tissue damage and adaptive responses. In addition, studies have revealed the need of negative regulation of the IL-1 family not only in disease, but also in homeostatic conditions. In this review, the negative regulation mediated by decoy receptors are presented and include IL-1R2 and IL-IL-18BP as well as atypical receptors, which include TIR8/SIGIRR, IL-1RAcPb, TIGIRR-1 and IL-1RAPL. Particular emphasis is given to IL-1R2, since its discovery is the basis for the formulation of the decoy paradigm, now considered a general strategy to counter the primary inflammatory activities of cytokines and chemokines. Emphasis is also given to TIR8, a prototypical negative regulatory receptor having non-redundant roles in limiting inflammation and adaptive responses.     

Chemokine receptor expression defines heterogeneity in the earliest thymic migrants

Chemokine signaling has been implicated in directing colonization of the fetal thymus by hematopoietic precursors. However, the patterns of expression of the chemokine receptors responsible for directing thymic colonization by the earliest thymic migrants remain unknown. We have identified heterogeneity within the earliest thymus seeding cells based on chemokine receptor expression. By analyzing the first wave of progenitors to colonize the thymus at E12 of gestation, we show that multiple chemokine receptors are expressed by T-lymphoid precursors present within perithymic mesenchyme, while expression of chemokine ligands is limited to CCL21, CCL25 and CXCL12, which are located in distinct epithelial and mesenchymal compartments of the thymic/parathyroid anlagen. Collectively, these results identify multiple populations of T-lymphoid precursors colonizing the fetal thymus and provide evidence for several potential pathways mediating migration of precursors into the embryonic thymus.     

Chemokine-like functions of MIF in atherosclerosis

The cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a unique pro-inflammatory regulator of many acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. In the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, chronic inflammation of the arterial wall characterized by chemokine-mediated influx of leukocytes plays a central role. The contribution of MIF to atherosclerotic vascular disease has come into focus of many studies in recent years. MIF is highly expressed in macrophages and endothelial cells of different types of atherosclerotic plaques, and functional studies established the contribution of MIF to lesion progression and plaque inflammation. This proatherogenic effect may partly be explained by the finding that MIF regulates inflammatory cell recruitment to lesion areas. Similar to chemokines, MIF induces integrin-dependent arrest and transmigration of monocytes and T cells. These chemokine-like functions are mediated through interaction of MIF with the chemokine receptors CXCR2 and CXCR4 as a non-canonical ligand. In atherogenic monocyte recruitment, MIF-induced monocyte adhesion involves CD74 and CXCR2, which form a signaling receptor complex. In addition to lesion progression, MIF has been implicated in plaque destabilization, since MIF is predominantly expressed in vulnerable plaques and can induce collagen-degrading matrix metalloproteinases. The latter could be a relevant mechanism in atherosclerotic abdominal aneurysm formation, where MIF expression is correlated with aneurysmal expansion. In summary, MIF has been identified as an important regulator of atherosclerotic vascular disease with exceptional chemokine-like functions. Detailed analysis of the interaction of MIF with its receptors could provide valuable information for drug development for the anti-inflammatory treatment of established and unstable atherosclerosis.     

Decoy receptor 3: Its role as biomarker for chronic inflammatory diseases

Members of the tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and TNF-α receptor (TNFR) superfamilies of proteins (TNFSF and TNFRSF, respectively) play important roles in the function of the immune system. Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3, TNFRSF6b) is a decoy receptor that binds to three TNFSF ligands, FasL, LIGHT and TL1A. Association to these ligands competes with the corresponding functional receptors and blocks downstream signaling, leading to immunomodulatory effects, including the prevention of apoptosis. DcR3 lacks a transmembrane region and exists only as a secreted protein, which is detectable in biological fluids. Recent studies have shown that DcR3 is upregulated and may be pathogenetically implicated in several and diverse chronic inflammatory diseases. The strongest associations have been described for rheumatological diseases, mainly systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and serious infectious conditions, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In the majority of these conditions, DcR3 mRNA and protein expression is elevated both at the target tissues as well as in the systemic circulation. DcR3 concentration in the serum is untraceable in the majority of healthy individuals but can be detected in patients with various inflammatory diseases. In most such cases, soluble DcR3 correlates with disease severity, as patients with severe forms of disease have significantly higher levels than patients with milder or no activity. In addition, effective anti-inflammatory treatment leads to the disappearance of soluble DcR3 from the circulation. Taken together, current evidence suggests that serum DcR3 may become a useful biomarker for chronic inflammatory disorders, as it is upregulated in response to inflammatory stimuli, and may serve both as a prognostic marker for disease severity and as a surrogate indicator of response to treatment.     

一种新的趋化因子I-TAC

趋化因子是一系列具有募集细胞迁移功能的细胞因子。干扰素诱导的T细胞α亚族趋化剂(I-TAC)是近年新发现的一种趋化因子,属于CXC家族。已经发现I-TAC不仅具有指导细胞迁移的趋化因子的基本功能,而且还参与调控血管生成及细胞增殖的过程。研究I-TAC结构、生物学功能以及与疾病的关系具有重要的意义。     

Chemokine/chemokine receptor interactions contribute to the accumulation of Th17 cells in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Chemokine/chemokine receptor interactions play a critical role in lymphocyte infiltration of tumors. Recent studies suggest that Th17 cells accumulate within many types of tumors, although the mechanisms that control this are unclear. We studied the distribution and phenotypic features of Th17 cells chemokine receptors, as well as the mRNA levels of CCL2, CCL17, CCL20, and CCL22 in tumors of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We found that Th17 cells accumulated in tumors, and high expressions of CCR4, CCR6 were detected in Th17 cells. Levels of the chemokines CCL17, CCL20, and CCL22 in tumors were significantly higher than in tumor-free tissues, and were positively correlated with the distribution of Th17 cells in tumors. Furthermore, an in vitro migration assay showed that CCL17, CCL20 and CCL22 had chemotactic effects on tumor-derived Th17 cells. In conclusion, the CCR4-CCL17/22 and CCR6-CCL20 axis might play an important role in Th17 cell infiltration of tumors.     

Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors as New Players in Autoimmunity

Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LILR) are a family of at least 13 receptors mainly expressed on lymphoid and myelomonocytic cells. They are involved in the activation of the immune system. Inhibitory LILR (termed LILRB) signal through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motives in the cytoplasmic domain, whereas LILRA with short cytoplasmic domains are stimulatory receptors. Polymorphisms and deletions of leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors have been shown to be associated with autoimmune disorders, and some of the receptors are involved in the generation of regulatory T cells. Therefore, leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors may be central in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity. The data linking these receptors to autoimmune diseases is reviewed here.     

The Differential Expression and Function of the Inflammatory Chemokine Receptor CXCR5 in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer

Background: Chemokine and chemokine receptors could have played an important role in tumor angiogenesis and distant metastasis. The mechanism of inflammation, expression and function of chemokines and chemokine receptors in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) remain unclear. The purpose of present study is to detect differential expression and function of chemokines and chemokine receptors (CCRs) in BPH and PCa.Methods: BPH-1 and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were co-cultured in Transwell chambers, and human normal prostate (NP) tissues, BPH tissues and PCa tissues were collected. CCR gene-chips were used to analyze and compare the differential expression of CCRs in BPH-1 cells, BPH-1 cells co-cultured with PBMCs, and LNCaP cells. The differential expression of CCRs was detected and validated using real-time PCR, western blotting and immunofluorescence (IF). The proliferation of LNCaP cells was also investigated after the knockdown CXCR5.Results: Results of gene-chips indicated that there was low or no expression of CCR10, CXCR1, CXCR3 and CXCR5 in BPH-1 cells, whereas the expression of these receptors in BPH-1 cells was increased by PBMCs, and the expression was high in LNCaP cells. Furthermore, real-time PCR and western blotting confirmed the above mentioned results. IF verified no or low expression of CXCR1, CXCR3 and CXCR5 in NP tissues, low or moderate expression in BPH and high expression in PCa. However, CCR10 was not expressed at detectable levels in the three groups. The growth and proliferation of LNCaP cells was markedly inhibited after down-regulation of CXCR5.Conclusions: PCa cells expressed high levels of CCR10, CXCR1, CXCR3 and CXCR5. Although BPH cells did not express these factors, their expression was up-regulated when BPH-1 cells were incubated with inflammatory cells. Finally, down-regulation of CXCR5 inhibited the growth and proliferation of LNCaP cells.     

广谱炎症趋化因子抑制先导物P1肽的活性及功能分析

目的初步探讨广谱趋化因子抑制先导物P1肽的活性及功能,为过度炎症反应的负调控提供理论基础。方法 MTT法检测P1肽的细胞毒性后,选择合适的浓度,应用液相芯片技术、钙流实验、RT-PCR和ELISA等方法对P1肽的活性和作用特点进行分析。结果 CXC类的IL-8、IP-10以及CC类的MCP-1、MIP-1β炎症趋化因子的产生量在P1肽的作用下有明显下降,且这两类趋化因子mRNA的表达量均有明显下降,进一步的实验显示P1肽不通过TTP途径降解mRNA;同时较之LPS炎症模型组,P1肽作用下的细胞炎症因子TNF-α的分泌水平有明显下降。结论合成后的P1肽具有良好的生物学活性;P1肽的作用靶点可能存在于炎症因子产生的上游信号通路中,P1肽不仅能从趋化因子mRNA水平降低趋化因子的表达量,同时还可抑制TNF-α的产生,进而发挥炎症抑制作用。     

Chemokine receptor CX3CR1 promotes dendritic cell development under steady-state conditions

Expression of CX3CR1 is an attribute of myeloid precursors committed to the monocyte/macrophage (Mφ)/DC lineages and is maintained during all stages of DC differentiation. Nevertheless, the exact role of this molecule during developmental progression of myeloid precursors towards the DC lineage remains elusive. To overcome potential compensatory mechanisms and issues of redundancy, we employed competitive adoptive transfer experiments to assess a possible function of CX3CR1 in DC and monocyte/Mφ differentiation in vivo. We show here that expression of CX3CR1 promotes the generation of DCs and monocytes/Mφ under steady-state conditions and during compensatory expansion after selective depletion of DCs, but not under inflammatory conditions evoked by sub-lethal irradiation. Direct administration of CX3CR1-deficient and CX3CR1-sufficient precursors into the spleen or the thymus resulted in a similar competitive advantage of WT over CX3CR1-deficient precursors as i.v. transfer, suggesting that CX3CR1-mediated survival rather than recruitment to lymphoid organs is critical for DC/Mφ differentiation. In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that CX3CR1 promotes proper development of myeloid precursors into DCs and monocytes/Mφs under steady-state conditions, possibly by providing survival signals or mediating accessibility to organ-specific niches, rather than acting as a mediator of homing to the spleen or the thymus.     

Murine macrophage chemokine receptor CCR2 plays a crucial role in macrophage recruitment and regulated inflammation in wound healing

Macrophages play a critical role in the establishment of a regulated inflammatory response following tissue injury. Following injury, CCR2⁺ monocytes are recruited from peripheral blood to wound tissue, and direct the initiation and resolution of inflammation that is essential for tissue repair. In pathologic states where chronic inflammation prevents healing, macrophages fail to transition to a reparative phenotype. Using a murine model of cutaneous wound healing, we found that CCR2‐deficient mice (CCR2^?/?) demonstrate significantly impaired wound healing at all time points postinjury. Flow cytometry analysis of wounds from CCR2^?/? and WT mice revealed a significant decrease in inflammatory, Ly6C^Hi recruited monocyte/macrophages in CCR2^?/? wounds. We further show that wound macrophage inflammatory cytokine production is decreased in CCR2^?/? wounds. Adoptive transfer of mT/mG monocyte/macrophages into CCR2^+/+ and CCR2^?/? mice demonstrated that labeled cells on days 2 and 4 traveled to wounds in both CCR2^+/+ and CCR2^?/? mice. Further, adoptive transfer of monocyte/macrophages from WT mice restored normal healing, likely through a restored inflammatory response in the CCR2‐deficient mice. Taken together, these data suggest that CCR2 plays a critical role in the recruitment and inflammatory response following injury, and that wound repair may be therapeutically manipulated through modulation of CCR2.     

Dominance of CCL22 over CCL17 in induction of chemokine receptor CCR4 desensitization and internalization on human Th2 cells

Chemokines and their receptors play a pivotal role in controlling T cell trafficking in immunity and inflammation. Two chemokines, CCL17 and CCL22, activate the chemokine receptor CCR4, expressed on functionally distinct subsets of T cells: cutaneous leukocyte-associated antigen (CLA)+ skin-homing, T helper (Th) 2, and CD25+ T suppressor cells. Here, we compared the ability of CCL17 and CCL22 to promote CCR4 internalization as a mechanism of regulation of receptor function on human Th2 cells. We report that CCL22 is a potent and rapid inducer of CCR4 internalization, while CCL17 is not. CCR4 internalization does not require G protein coupling, while being dependent on lipid rafts integrity and clathrin-coated pits functionality. Cell surface disappearance of CCR4 is rapidly reversed upon removal of exogenous ligand by virtue of receptor recycling. CCR4 internalization leads to a loss of functional responsiveness, while recovery of surface expression leads to re-acquisition of chemotactic sensitivity of Th2 cells. The differential CCR4 desensitization and internalization reported here and the distinct expression patterns of CCL17 and CCL22 observed in vivo suggest that while CCL17 may act first on CCR4 at the endothelial surface to promote vascular recognition, CCL22 could subsequently engage the receptor within the tissue microenvironment to guide cellular localization.     

Chemokine Receptors and Chemokines in HIV Infection

Suppression of HIV by chemokines represents a special case in virology and immunology where soluble molecules other than antibodies inhibit infection by a specific virus. The basis for this inhibition is that HIV has evolved to use certain chemokine receptors as coreceptors for entry into host cells. Human genotypes that reduce or prevent coreceptor expression are strongly associated with protection against infection and slower disease progression. We suggest that local production of certain chemokines can produce a similar modulation of coreceptor expression, and mounting evidence indicates that chemokine release is a major determinant of protection from HIV infection. Here we review this evidence and explore future avenues for investigating the role of chemokines in controlling HIV infection.     

Chemokine CXC Receptor 4: An Evolutionary Approach

Selected segments of the nucleotide sequences of the human 18S rRNA and the human formyl peptide receptor 1 mRNA exhibit structural similarities that are unlikely to be due simply to chance. Herein we analyze the structural similarities between the human 18S rRNA gene and the vertebrate chemokine CXC receptor 4 (CXCR4) gene that encodes a class A (rhodopsin-like) seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor belonging to the same superfamily of formyl peptide receptors. The method of study was based on the recording of the positions of the 7-or-more-base oligonucleotide identities encountered in the 18S and CXCR4 genes and the construction of scatter-plots (abscissa-18S; ordinate-CXCR4) displaying the identity points positions. Analysis of the distribution of distances between identity points (abscissa-ordinate in the scatter-plot) demonstrated distinct peaks of frequency around 1200. Series of identities arranged near diagonal lines at 45° in the scatter-plot (quasialignments) were evaluated for their probabilistic level of random occurrence. Results of this analysis demonstrated nonrandom quasialignments between (i) a 900-nt ca. section of the human CXCR4 intron that immediately precedes almost the whole of the coding sequence and the 18S gene from nt 125 to 1025 ca.; and (ii) a 425-nt ca. section of the CXCR4 vertebrate genes, corresponding to nt 137–560 of the coding sequence, and the 18S gene from nt 1300 to 1730 ca. In both instances significant quasialignments are evidenced when CXCR4 nt sequences are shifted to the right by about 1200 nt with respect to the 18S nt sequence, as confirmed by analysis of the abscissa - ordinate differences. Taken together, these results indicate that, at least in humans, a continuous nonrandom quasialignment extends for some 1600 nt, from the second part of the (single) intron to the first part of the coding sequence. We hypothesize that the relatively more recent CXCR4 vertebrate gene might be evolutionarily related to the more ancient and highly conserved 18S gene.     

Chemokine receptors and leukocyte trafficking in the mucosal immune system

The CC chemokine receptors CCR6, CCR9, and CCR10 all contribute to the positioning of leukocytes at mucosal locations. Mucosal epithelial cells are major sources of the chemokine ligands for each of these receptors, although the pattern of expression of the individual ligands differs at distinct mucosal sites. CCR6 is expressed by most B cells, subsets of CD4 and CD8 memory T cells, and subsets of dendritic cells (DCs). Absence of CCR6 in mice leads to abnormal expansion of intestinal intraepithelial T cells and lamina propria T cells, smaller Peyer's patches, and defects in IgA-mediated responses to oral antigens and pathogens. CCR9 is present on thymocytes, most intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes, and other types of intestine-homing T cells. CCR 10 is found on skin-homing T cells and also direct IgA-producing plasma cells into mucosal sites. This review discusses the role of these chemokine receptors in homeostatic regulation of the mucosal immune system.