Post‐cholecystectomy cystic duct stump leak: a preventable morbidity

OBJECTIVE:  While major bile duct injury is the most serious complication following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile leak from the cystic duct stump remains the commonest morbidity. This is a retrospective assessment of all patients who had a cholecystectomy over a 5‐year period from April 2003 to March 2008. METHODS:  Data related to bile leakage were obtained from the Unisoft endoscopic retrograde cholangio‐pancreatography (ERCP) database. RESULTS:  Overall 2011 cholecystectomies were performed, of which 488 were done as emergency procedures. Thirteen patients had significant bile leakage, three of which were from accessory ducts, in one the source could not be identified and nine had a cystic duct stump leak (CDSL), which formed the basis of this study. Eight of the nine CDSL patients had successful ERCP and stenting. One had a percutaneous trans‐hepatic cholangiography and stenting. CDSL following emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy was up to threefold higher than after elective procedures. CONCLUSION:  The CDSL of 0.44% was comparable to the reported incidence in the literature. Endoscopic management remains the treatment of choice. Emergency cholecystectomies seem to have a higher incidence of CDSL.     

Treatment of biliary leakages after cholecystectomy and importance of stricture development in the main bile duct injury.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic treatment of biliary leakages after cholecystectomy, though widely accepted, has some restrictions. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatments in this patient group are evaluated in this study, and the problem of biliary stricture development in time after biliary ductal injuries is also emphasized. METHODS: Seventy-four patients (20 male, 54 female, mean age 50.9+/-21 years) referred for ERCP between 1992-2002 were included in the study. Minor leakages (cystic duct leaks, accessory bile duct leaks) were managed by nasobiliary drainage +/- endoscopic sphincterotomy; major leakages were managed by nasobiliary drainage +/- endoscopic sphincterotomy +/- stenting. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with cystic duct leaks and 6 patients with accessory bile duct leaks were successfully treated with nasobiliary drainage. Endoscopic treatment could not be performed on patients with total bile duct obstruction (7 patients) and aberrant bile duct injury (7 patients). All leakages from main bile ducts were closed (27 patients). Six of 27 patients had strictures at the beginning and they were treated by stenting. Twenty-one patients had no strictures at the beginning. Eight of 21 were treated by stenting and only 1 of them developed biliary stricture. Seven of 13 patients who had been treated by nasobiliary drainage developed biliary strictures. There were no mortalities due to procedure. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is an effective and safe method for diagnosis and management of bile leakages after cholecystectomy. Stricture development in the main bile duct leakages was an important complication.     

Endoscopic management of postoperative bile leaks

BACKGROUND: Significant bile leak as an uncommon complication after biliary tract surgery may constitute a serious and difficult management problem. Surgical management of biliary fistulae is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Biliary endoscopic procedures have become the treatment of choice for management of biliary Gstulae. METHODS: Ninety patients presented with bile leaks after cholecystectomy ( open cholecystectomy in 45 patients, cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration in 20 and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 25). The presence of bile leaks was confirmed by ERCP and the appearance of bile in percutaneous drainage of abdominal collections. Of the 90 patients with postoperative bile leaks, 18 patients had complete transaction of the common bile duct by ERCP and were subjected to bilioenteric anastomosis. In the remaining patients after cholangiography and localization of the site of bile leaks. therapeutic procedures like sphinctero-tomy, biliary stenting and nasobiliary drainage ( NBD ) were performed. If residual stones were seen in the common bile duct, sphincterotomy was followed by stone extraction using dormia basket. Nasobiliary drain or stents of 7F size were placed according to the standard techniques. The NBD was removed when bile leak stopped and closure of the fistula confirmed cholangiographically. The stents were removed after an interval of 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Bile leaks in 72 patients occurred in the cystic duct (38 patients), the common bile duct (30 ), and the right hepatic duct (4). Of the 72 patients with post-operative bile leak, 24 had associated retained common bile duct stones and 1 had ascaris in common bile duct. All the 72 patients were subjected to therapeutic procedures including sphincterotomy with stone extraction followed by biliary stenting (24 patients), removal of ascaris and biliary stenting (1), sphincterotomy with biliary stenting (18), sphincterotomy with NBD (12), biliary stenting alone (12), and NBD alone (5). Bile leaks stopped in all patients at a median interval of 3 days (range 3-16 days) after endoscopic in- terventions. No difference was observed in efficacy and in time for the treatment of bile leak by sphincterotomy with endoprosthesis or endoprosthesis alone in patients with bile leak after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Post-cholecystectomy bile leaks occur most commonly in the cystic duct and associated common bile duct stones are found in one-third of cases. Endoscopic therapy is safe and effective in the management of bile leaks and fistulae after surgery. Sphincterotomy with endoprosthesis or endoprosthesis alone is equally effective in the management of postoperative bile leak.     

Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients

BACKGROUND: Bile leak is among the most common complications of cholecystectomy. Endoscopic therapy is empiric; a systematic approach to management of bile leak has not been established. METHODS: The severity of bile leak was classified by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography into low grade (leak identified only after intrahepatic opacification) or high grade (leak observed before intrahepatic opacification). Therapy was based on this distinction: biliary sphincterotomy alone for low-grade leaks and stent placement for high-grade leaks. The success of this strategy in consecutive patients treated between 1989 and 1999 was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients (127 women, 80 men; median age 57 years) with bile leak were referred for endoscopic management; 134 had undergone laparoscopic, and 72 had open cholecystectomy. Patients presented at a median of 9 days (range 1-50 days) after surgery. Symptoms included pain (56%), jaundice (16%), fever (11%), and abdominal distension (7%). Persistent percutaneous drainage was present in 48%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography identified the leak site in 204 patients: cystic duct stump, 159 patients (78%); duct of Luschka, 26 (13%); other, 19 (9%). Of 104 patients with low-grade leaks, 75 had sphincterotomy alone; improvement occurred in 68 patients (91%). Subsequent treatment was required in 7 patients (6 stent, 1 surgery). Stents were placed in the remaining 29/104 patients for the following reasons: biliary stricture (11/29); coagulopathy, precluding sphincterotomy (8/29); severe sepsis (3/29); inadequate drainage after prior sphincterotomy (2/29); and unclear reasons (5/29). Of 100 patients with high-grade leaks, 97 had stent placement. Persistent leakage necessitated another stent insertion in 4 patients. Closure of the leak was documented by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in all 97 patients. Three patients with leaks not amenable to endoscopic treatment were referred for surgery. Bile-duct stones were identified in 41 patients (28, low-grade group; 13, high-grade group) and were extracted in all cases. Overall, complications occurred in 3 patients (2 pancreatitis, 1 perforation) and were managed conservatively with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, practical endoscopic classification system for bile leak after cholecystectomy is proposed. This classification has clinical relevance for selection of optimal endoscopic management.     

Minimally invasive management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BackgroundWe conducted this prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous catheter drainage as a minimally invasive treatment in the management of symptomatic bile leak following biliary injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsTwenty two patients with symptomatic bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent percutaneous drainage of the bile collection under ultrasound control. In patients with jaundice and in those with persistent drainage, endoscopic retrograde cholecysto-pancreatography (ERCP) was performed immediately for diagnostic and for therapeutic intervention when appropriate. In other patients, ERCP was performed 4–6 weeks after the discharge from the hospital to document the healing of the leaking site.ResultsFive patients with jaundice were initially treated by a combination of endoscopic plus percutaneous drainage. One of them required surgical treatment following diagnosis of a major duct injury. The other 17 were treated by percutaneous drainage initially and for 14 of them it was definitive treatment. Three patients required sphincterotomy as additional treatment for stopping the leak. There were no complications related to the percutaneous drainage procedure.ConclusionsMost patients with bile leakage can be managed successfully by percutaneous drainage. If biliary output does not decrease, endoscopy is needed. In patients with jaundice endoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures should be performed immediately.     

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for treating bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bile leaks are common complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We evaluated the diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of bile leaks. METHODOLOGY: A total of 436 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with infrahepatic drainage. We performed immediate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on all patients with bile discharge from an infrahepatic drain, and treated bile leaks which were not due to a major ductal injury by endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) without endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). RESULTS: Ten patients developed bile leaks which were recognized within 18 hours of operation. ERCP, on post-operative day 1 or 2, showed a bile leak from the cystic duct (9 patients) or the liver bed (1 patient). All patients underwent ENBD. Only 1 patient, who had a retained stone, had ES. In all patients, the bile leak resolved promptly and both the infrahepatic and nasobiliary drains were removed within 6 days of cholecystectomy. All patients were asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Routine placement of an infrahepatic drain is recommended for the early detection of bile leaks. Bile leaks can be successfully treated by prompt ENBD without ES.     

The outcome of endoscopic treatment in bile duct injury after cholecystectomy]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bile duct injury is the most serious complication of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic treatment in bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. METHODS: We reviewed the results of endoscopic treatments in the patients diagnosed as bile duct injury after cholecystectomy on cholangiographic examinations, retrospectively. Endoscopic treatment included insertion of nasobiliary drainage catheter or plastic stent after endoscopic sphicterotomy. RESULTS: A total of twenty-two patients (9 male, 13 female; median age of 59 years) with bile duct injury were included. Endoscopic treatment was successfully performed in 12 of 13 patients with bile leak only. In patients with both bile leak and stricture, endoscopic treatment was successful in 2 of 3 patients. In 6 patients with complete obstruction of bile duct, endoscopic treatment failed and surgical approach was needed. In our series, transpapillary endoscopic treatment was not successful when proximal bile duct above the injured site was not visualized by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and surgery was performed in all cases. Overall success rate of endoscopic treatment in 22 patients with bile duct injury was 64% (14/22). There was no complication associated with endoscopic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is useful for the treatment of bile leakage after cholecystectomy and can be used for the treatment prior to surgery. Surgical intervention is needed in case of endoscopic treatment failure.     

Management of postoperative bile leakage with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and a naso-biliary drain (NBD).

Between July 1987 and December 1990, 13 patients with postoperative bile leakage were treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy and a naso-biliary drain. All the leaks healed in two weeks, except for one (intrahepatic) that needed two months to heal in association with percutaneous management. The non-surgical treatment of bile leakage is the preferred approach on account of the superior safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness as compared with surgical repair, which is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and costs. The treatment of choice has to be endoscopic, which is much easier and safer than the transhepatic approach, especially in the non-dilated duct, while another advantage over radiology includes the possibility for rapid definitive treatment of distal obstruction (e.g. residual stones). A leak from an extrahepatic duct heals rapidly, while a leak from an intrahepatic duct takes longer to heal and sometimes needs associated percutaneous drainage. Finally, the authors propose treating an extrahepatic bile leak merely with naso-biliary drainage without cutting the papilla, and an intrahepatic bile leak with endoscopic sphincterotomy, nasobiliary drainage and a bilio-duodenal endoprosthesis.     

Endoscopic management of bile leaks after blunt abdominal trauma

Background and Study Aims:  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) has been found to be useful for the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic bile leaks, but data on outcome after therapeutic ERCP is limited. We performed a prospective study on evaluation of ERCP for diagnosis and treatment of bile leaks following blunt abdominal trauma.
Patients and Methods:  Ten patients of bile leaks following blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated for modes of injury, clinical presentations, investigations, ERCP findings, modes of therapy and outcome. The time interval between trauma and ERCP, ERCP and healing of bile leak and complications of ERCP were also recorded.
Results:  Ten patients (age 21.9 ± 14.5 years, 6 males) presented 24.6 ± 17.1 days following trauma. The modes of injury were motor vehicle accident ( n  = 6), and fall from height ( n  = 4). The ERCP revealed bile leak from the right hepatic duct ( n  = 7), both right and left hepatic ducts ( n  = 1), mid-common bile duct ( n  = 1), and peripheral branches of right hepatic duct ( n  = 1). Procedures for ERCP included endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with stenting in nine patients and ES with nasobiliary drainage in one patient. Bile leak resolved in all the patients in 8.5 ± 8.2 days. Biliary stents and the nasobiliary drain were removed after 36.4 ± 16.2 days of their insertion and all the patients remain asymptomatic for follow up of 33 ± 20.8 months.
Conclusions:  Therapeutic ERCP procedures like endoscopic sphincterotomy with stenting or nasobiliary drainage are effective in management of bile leaks following blunt abdominal trauma.     

ENDOSCOPIC OCCLUSION OF CYSTIC DUCT USING N‐BUTYL CYANOACRYLATE FOR POSTOPERATIVE BILE LEAKAGE

Bile leak after cholecystectomy is well described, with the cystic duct remnant the site of the leak in the majority of cases. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary stent placement has a high success rate in such cases. When ERCP fails, options include surgery, and percutaneous and endoscopic transcatheter occlusion of the site of bile leak. Here, we describe a case of endoscopic transcatheter occlusion of a persistent cystic duct bile leak after cholecystectomy using N‐butyl cyanoacrylate glue. A 51‐year‐old man had persistent pain and bilious drainage following a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The bile leak persisted after endoscopic placement of a biliary stent for a confirmed cystic duct leak. A repeat ERCP was carried out and the cystic duct was occluded with a combination of angiographic coils and N‐butyl cyanoacrylate glue. The patient's pain and bilious drainage resolved. A follow‐up cholangiogram confirmed complete resolution of the cystic duct leak and a patent common bile duct.     

Outcome of early endoscopic biliary drainage in the management of bile leaks after hepatic resection

BACKGROUND: Bile leaks are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Endoscopic stent insertion is the treatment of choice, although the optimal timing of stent placement has not been established. This study reviewed the outcome of early endoscopic biliary stent insertion for treatment of bile leaks after hepatic resection. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients underwent hepatic resection in a single unit from July 1995 to December 2000. The type of liver resection, clinical presentation of bile leaks, findings on ERCP, and outcomes after stent placement were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty patients (17%) had bile leaks; 15 had bile in surgical drains but were asymptomatic, and 5 had clinical evidence of a subphrenic collection. In one patient the leak closed spontaneously. The remaining 19 patients underwent ERCP. Fifteen had a leak from a peripheral biliary radical and an endoscopic stent was inserted. Two had a hepatic duct stump leak and were treated by nasobiliary drainage followed by stent insertion. In the remaining 2 patients cholangiography did not demonstrate a leak but a plastic stent was inserted. ERCP was performed a median of 6 days (range 5 to 10 days) after surgery. There was no ERCP-related complication. Median hospital stay in the 95 patients without a bile leak was 10 days (range 4-30 days) compared with 15 days (range 10-41 days) for those with bile leaks (NS). Stents were removed endoscopically at 6 weeks with no persistent leaks detected. There were no late biliary complications (median follow-up 26 months, range 12-72 months). CONCLUSIONS: Early endoscopic biliary stent insertion is effective in the management of bile leakage after hepatic resection.     

Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

From January 1990 to June 1994, 53 patients who sustained bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy were treated at the Amsterdam Academic Medical Centre. There were 16 men and 37 women with a mean age of 47 years. Follow up was established in all patients for a median of 17 months. Four types of ductal injury were identified. Type A (18 patients) had leakage from cystic ducts or peripheral hepatic radicles, type B (11 patients) had major bile duct leakage, type C (nine patients) had an isolated ductal stricture, and type D (15 patients) had complete transection of the bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) established the diagnosis in all type A, B, and C lesions. In type D lesions percutaneous cholangiography was required to delineate the proximal extent of the injury. Initial treatment (until resolution of symptoms and discharge from hospital) comprised endoscopy in 36 patients and surgery in 26 patients. Endoscopic treatment was possible and successful in 16 of 18 of type A lesions, five of seven of type B lesions, and three of nine of type C lesions. Most failures resulted from inability to pass strictures or leaks at the initial endoscopy. During initial treatment additional surgery was required in seven patients. Fourteen patients underwent percutaneous or surgical drainage of bile collections, or both. After endoscopic treatment early complications occurred in three patients, with a fatal outcome in two (not related to the endoscopic therapy). During follow up six patients developed late complications. All 15 patients with complete transection and four patients with major bile duct leakage were initially treated surgically. During initial treatment additional endoscopy was required in two patients. Early complications occurred in eight patients. During follow up seven patients developed stenosis of the anastomosis or bile duct. Reconstructive surgery in the early postoperative phase was associated with more complications than elective reconstructive surgery. Most type A and B bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (80%) can be treated endoscopically. In patients with more severe ductal injury (type C and D) reconstructive surgery is eventually required in 70%. Multidisciplinary approach to these lesions is advocated and algorithms for treatment are proposed.     

The role of endoscopic treatment in postoperative bile leaks

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bile leak is among the most common and serious complications of biliary tract surgery. The aim of this non-randomized study was to evaluate the role of endoscopic intervention as an accepted treatment for this complication. METHODOLOGY: An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) database was reviewed retrospectively to identify all cases of bile leak related to cholecystectomy (laparoscopic or open). Patients' records and endoscopy reports were reviewed. Moreover, structured telephone interviews were conducted to collect data. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, 4 males and 20 females, with a median age of 54 (range 28-76 years) with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leaks were referred for ERCP performed 3-73 days after operation (mean 9.5 days). All but one case had high-grade bile-like liquid outflowing from the original drainage tubes or the fistulous tract of T-tube. One patient presented with bilious ascites, 17 patients had sudden or gradual abdominal pain, 3 jaundice, 2 abdominal pain with fever, and 1 nausea and vomiting. ERCP was successful in all cases, and revealed leakage from the cystic stump in 10 cases, from a common bile duct (CBD) defect in 6, from a common hepatic duct defect in 3, from the gallbladder bed in 2, from a T-tube track in 1, and complete CBD transection in 2 patients. Seventeen patients were successfully treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) plus endoprosthesis, 3 by stent placement without sphincterotomy, 2 with complete transection by proximal hepaticojejunostomy, and 2 patients with leakage from the cystic stump and a CBD defect were operated after unsuccessful endoscopic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is recommended as a safe and efficacious intervention to detect and treat postoperative bile leaks. ES plus endoprosthesis is effective for the treatment of bile leakage. Endoscopic stenting without sphincterotomy may be offered as a primary option in young patients with postoperative bile leaks.     

Acute biliary conditions

Acute biliary complications may result from several medical conditions such as gallstone pancreatitis, acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, bile leak, liver abscess and hepatic trauma. Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis. About 25% of theses patients will develop clinically severe acute pancreatitis, usually due to necrotizing pancreatitis. Choledocholithiasis, malignant and benign biliary strictures, and stent dysfunction may cause partial or complete obstruction and infection in the biliary tract with acute cholangitis. Bile leaks are most commonly associated with hepatobiliary surgeries or invasive procedures such as open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hepatic resection, hepatic transplantation, liver biopsy, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may have an essential role in the management of these complications.     

Mangafodipir-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of bile duct leaks

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with mangafodipir trisodium perfusion for detection and localization of trauma-induced and postoperative bile duct leaks. METHODS: Eleven patients with suspected bile duct leaks after trauma (n=5) or surgery (n=6) were included. Patients with suspected leaks after cholecystectomy were excluded. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with two-dimensional axial and three-dimensional coronal gradient-echo images acquired 1 to 3 hours after intravenous administration of mangafodipir trisodium perfusion. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography findings were correlated with direct cholangiography obtained in all patients, including endoscopic retrograde (n=7) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n=4). RESULTS: Biliary tract enhancement was identified in all patients on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Peritoneal cavity fluid and bile collections that contained extravasated mangafodipir trisodium (increased signal intensity on gradient-echo sequences) were demonstrated in 6 patients. Direct cholangiography confirmed the presence of bile duct leaks in these 6 patients and the absence of bile duct leaks in 5 patients. There was no false-negative or false-positive contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. CONCLUSIONS: Mangafodipir-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography is a noninvasive technique that can provide functional biliary information with excellent depiction of bile duct leaks.     

Reality named endoscopic ultrasound biliary drainage

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for diagnosis and evaluation of many diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In the past, it was used to guide a cholangiography, but nowadays it emerges as a powerful therapeutic tool in biliary drainage. The aims of this review are: outline the rationale for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EGBD); detail the procedural technique; evaluate the clinical outcomes and limitations of the method; and provide recommendations for the practicing clinician. In cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), patients are usually referred for either percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgical bypass. Both these procedures have high rates of undesirable complications. EGBD is an attractive alternative to PTBD or surgery when ERCP fails. EGBD can be performed at two locations: transhepatic or extrahepatic, and the stent can be inserted in an antegrade or retrograde fashion. The drainage route can be transluminal, duodenal or transpapillary, which, again, can be antegrade or retrograde [rendezvous (EUS-RV)]. Complications of all techniques combined include pneumoperitoneum, bleeding, bile leak/peritonitis and cholangitis. We recommend EGBD when bile duct access is not possible because of failed cannulation, altered upper GI tract anatomy, gastric outlet obstruction, a distorted ampulla or a periampullary diverticulum, as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery or radiology.     

Endoscopic Management of Bile Leakage after Liver Transplantation

Background/Aims

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can be an effective treatment for bile leakage after liver transplantation. We evaluated the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in liver transplantation in patients who developed bile leaks.

Methods

Forty-two patients who developed bile leaks after liver transplantation were included in the study. If a bile leak was observed on ERCP, a sphincterotomy was performed, and a nasobiliary catheter was then inserted. If a bile leak was accompanied by a bile duct stricture, either the stricture was dilated with balloons, followed by nasobiliary catheter insertion across the bile duct stricture, or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage was performed.

Results

In the bile leakage alone group (22 patients), endoscopic treatment was technically successful in 19 (86.4%) and clinically successful in 17 (77.3%) cases. Among the 20 patients with bile leaks with bile duct strictures, endoscopic treatment was technically successful in 13 (65.0%) and clinically successful in 10 (50.0%) cases. Among the 42 patients who underwent ERCP, technical success was achieved in 32 (76.2%) cases and clinical success was achieved in 27 (64.3%) cases.

Conclusions

ERCP is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for bile leaks after liver transplantation. ERCP should be considered as an initial therapeutic modality in post-liver transplantation patients.     

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing hepatolithiasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Direct cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography sometimes fails to adequately opacify the entire biliary tract, because of severe biliary obstruction caused by ductal stricture or lodged stones. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for hepatolithiasis. METHODOLOGY: Five patients with hepatolithiasis underwent ultrasonography, computed tomography, direct cholangiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence. Surgical exploration or pathologic examination revealed stricture and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts in all patients. Diagnostic accuracies for stones and ductal abnormalities were compared among the imaging studies. RESULTS: No complications occurred during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography fully depicted the biliary tract. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detected and localized intrahepatic stones, as well as bile duct stricture and dilatation, in all patients. Intrahepatic stones were detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in one of four patients and by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in all three who underwent this procedure. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography demonstrated ductal stricture in all patients but failed to completely demonstrate the biliary tree in three of four patients, and one of three, respectively. On ultrasonography and computed tomography, precise localization of stones was difficult. Ultrasonography and computed tomography failed to demonstrate ductal stricture in one and two of the five patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnoses intrahepatic stones and bile duct abnormalities less invasively and more accurately than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.     

Leaks from laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Significant postoperative bile leaks occur in approximately 1% of patients. The goal of endoscopic therapy is to eliminate the transpapillary pressure gradient, thereby permitting preferential transpapillary bile flow rather than extravasation at the site of leak. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-four patients were retrospectively evaluated. Endoscopic treatment comprised endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by insertion of a naso-biliary drainage or a stent. Retained stones were extracted by standard procedures. RESULTS: The site of bile extravasation was the cystic duct in 50 cases, ducts of Luschka in 4 cases, common bile duct in 6 cases and common hepatic duct in 4 cases. Retained bile duct stones were detected in 21 cases and papillary stenosis in 4 cases. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 25 cases, with stones extraction and nasobiliary drainage in 21 cases, and placement of stent in the remainder. Bile leaks resolved in 96.9% of patients, after endoscopic procedure. Two cases of mild pancreatitis were evidenced from endoscopic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management is the treatment of choice of postcholecystectomy bile leaks.     

Access for percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy in patients with nondilated bile ducts using nasobiliary catheter cholangiography and oblique fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is required for percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy. However, puncture of nondilated bile ducts under ultrasonographic guidance is difficult. METHODS: In 10 patients with no ultrasonographic evidence of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was performed under fluoroscopic guidance using cholangiography obtained via a nasobiliary drainage catheter. Direct puncture was performed by means of a left ventral approach using oblique C-arm fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Bile duct puncture was successful in all patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Subsequent cholangioscopy was successful in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Direct puncture using nasobiliary drainage cholangiography and oblique fluoroscopy is a useful method when cholangioscopy is necessary in patients with nondilated bile ducts.