Profile of medical ICU vs. ward patients in an acute care hospital

Demographic characteristics, severity of illness, resource utilization, and outcome were compared for 351 medical ICU (MICU) and 329 ward patients of a large, urban, tertiary care hospital. Patients were similar in age, race, sex, and insurance coverage. Both MICU and ward patients had similar health status distributions 3 to 6 months before hospitalization. Severity of illness, as measured by the Acute Physiology Score was significantly higher in the MICU patients, although there was considerable overlap in the distributions. Resource utilization, as measured by the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), was also significantly higher in the MICU; again, the distributions of the two groups overlapped, although mostly for low values of TISS. Of the MICU sample, 28% to 30% never required active therapeutic interventions; 11% of the ward sample received active treatment. The significant overlap between MICU and ward distributions of severity of illness and resource utilization has implications for admission and discharge policies.     

Impact of intensive care unit discharge time on patient outcome

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of nighttime intensive care unit (ICU) discharge on patient outcome. DESIGN: Multiple-center, retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Canadian hospitals. PATIENTS: We used a prospectively collected dataset containing information on 79,090 consecutive admissions from 31 Canadian community and teaching hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were categorized according to the time of ICU discharge into daytime (07:00-20:59) and nighttime (21:00-06:59). Admissions were excluded if the patients were a) 相似文献   

Reasons for refusal of admission to intensive care and impact on mortality

Purpose

To identify factors influencing triage decisions and investigate whether admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) could reduce mortality compared with treatment on the ward.

Methods

A multicentre cohort study in 11 university hospitals from seven countries, evaluating triage decisions and outcomes of patients referred for admission to ICU who were either accepted, or refused and treated on the ward. Confounding in the estimation of the effect of ICU admission on mortality was controlled by use of a propensity score approach, which adjusted for the probability of being admitted. Variability across centres was accounted for in both analyses of factors influencing ICU admission and effect of ICU admission on mortality.

Results

Eligible were 8,616 triages in 7,877 patients referred for ICU admission. Variables positively associated with probability of being admitted to ICU included: ventilators in ward; bed availability; Karnofsky score; absence of comorbidity; presence of haematological malignancy; emergency surgery and elective surgery (versus medical treatment); trauma, vascular involvement, liver involvement; acute physiologic score II; ICU treatment (versus ICU observation). Multiple triages during patient’s hospital stay and age were negatively associated with ICU admission. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the model was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81–0.84], with Hosmer–Lemeshow test P = 0.300. ICU admission was associated with a statistically significant reduction of both 28-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62–0.87] and 90-day mortality (0.79; 0.66–0.93). The benefit of ICU admission increased substantially in patients with greater severity of illness.

Conclusions

We suggest that intensivists take great care to avoid ICU admission of patients judged not severe enough for ICU or with low performance status, and they tend to admit surgical patients more readily than medical patients. Interestingly, they do not judge age per se as a reason for refusal of ICU admission. Admission to ICU was associated with a reduction of both 28- and 90-day mortality, particularly in patients with greater severity of illness at time of triage.     

Post-intensive care unit pediatric hospital stay and estimated costs

OBJECTIVE: For pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, to determine the proportion of hospital stay and estimated hospital costs accounted for by post-ICU care. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients who survive an ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Estimated relative daily costs were assumed as follows: ICU, with ventilator/ICU, not on ventilator/intermediate care unit/general pediatric hospital day, at 2:1:0.7:0.3, respectively. Estimated costs were expressed in arbitrary units as (number of days at each level of care) x (relative cost per day). The ICU phase was defined as the patient's first ICU admission only, and the post-ICU phase included intermediate care unit and general pediatric hospital days, as well as ICU readmission during the same hospitalization. Pre-ICU hospital activity was excluded from analysis. For 341 ICU survivors, post-ICU days (median, 4 days per patient) accounted for 62% of the total hospital stay. Post-ICU care accounted for one third of the total estimated hospital costs for ICU survivors. Patients with longer post-ICU stays could not be reliably identified at the time of ICU discharge according to their ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation in the ICU, age, ICU day 1 mortality probability, or diagnostic group (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Post-ICU care accounts for a substantial proportion of hospital stay and estimated costs for ICU survivors. These observations suggest that developing strategies to optimize hospital utilization at the time of ICU discharge may be important for controlling costs of recovery from critical illness.     

Physical activity of patients with critical illness undergoing rehabilitation in intensive care and on the acute ward: An observational cohort study

BackgroundThere are limited published data on physical activity of survivors of critical illness engaged in rehabilitation in hospital, despite it plausibly influencing outcome.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to measure physical activity of patients with critical illness engaged in rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) and on the acute ward and report discharge destination, muscle strength, and functional outcomes.MethodsThis was a single-centre, prospective observational study. Adults with critical illness, who received ≥48 h of invasive mechanical ventilation, and who were awake and able to participate in rehabilitation were eligible. To record physical activity, participants wore BodyMedia SenseWear Armbands (BodyMedia Incorporated, USA), during daylight hours, from enrolment until hospital discharge or day 14 of ward stay (whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was time (minutes) spent performing physical activity at an intensity of greater than 1.5 Metabolic Equivalent Tasks. Secondary outcomes included discharge destination, muscle strength, and physical function.ResultsWe collected 807 days of physical activity data (363 days ICU, 424 days ward) from 59 participants. Mean (standard deviation) duration of daily physical activity increased from the ICU, 17.8 (22.8) minutes, to the ward, 52.8 (51.2) minutes (mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 35 [23.8–46.1] minutes, P < .001). High levels of activity in the ICU were associated with higher levels of activity on the ward (r = .728), n = 48, P < .001.ConclusionsPatients recovering from critical illness spend less than 5% of the day being physically active throughout hospital admission, even when receiving rehabilitation. Physical activity increased after discharge from intensive care, but had no relationship with discharge destination. Only the absence of ICU-acquired weakness on awakening was associated with discharge directly home from the acute hospital. Future studies could target early identification of ICU-acquired weakness and the preservation of muscle strength to improve discharge outcomes.     

The ICU trial: a new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation are widely viewed as poor candidates for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We designed a prospective study evaluating a new admission policy titled The ICU Trial. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Intensive care unit. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-eight patients requiring mechanical ventilation and having at least one other organ failure. INTERVENTIONS: Over a 3-yr period, all patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors proposed for ICU admission underwent a triage procedure. Bedridden patients and patients in whom palliative care was the only cancer treatment option were not admitted to the ICU. Patients at earliest phase of the malignancy (diagnosis < 30 days) were admitted without any restriction. All other patients were prospectively included in The ICU Trial, consisting of a full-code ICU admission followed by reappraisal of the level of care on day 5. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 188 patients, 103 survived the first 4 ICU days and 85 died from the acute illness. Hospital survival was 21.8% overall. Among the 103 survivors on day 5, none of the characteristics of the malignancy were significantly different between the 62 patients who died and the 41 who survived. Time course of organ dysfunction over the first 6 ICU days differed significantly between survivors and nonsurvivors. Organ failure scores were more accurate on day 6 than at admission or on day 3 for predicting survival. All patients who required initiation of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, or dialysis after 3 days in the ICU died. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was 40% in mechanically ventilated cancer patients who survived to day 5 and 21.8% overall. If these results are confirmed in future interventional studies, we recommend ICU admission with full-code management followed by reappraisal on day 6 in all nonbedridden cancer patients for whom lifespan-extending cancer treatment is available.     

Who bounces back? Physiologic and other predictors of intensive care unit readmission

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of changes in acute physiology scores (APS) and other patient characteristics on predicting intensive care unit (ICU) readmission. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single large university medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: A total of 4,684 consecutive admissions from January 1, 1994, to April 1, 1998, to the medical ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The independent influence of patient characteristics, including daily APS, admission diagnosis, treatment status, and admission location, on ICU readmission was evaluated using logistic regression. After accounting for first ICU admission deaths, 3,310 patients were "at-risk" for ICU readmission and 317 were readmitted (9.6%). Hospital mortality was five times higher (43% vs. 8%; p < .0001), and length of stay was two times longer (16 +/- 16 vs. 32 +/- 28 days; p < .001) in readmitted patients. Mean discharge APS was significantly higher in the readmitted group compared with the not readmitted group (43 +/- 19 vs. 34 +/- 18; p > .01). Significant independent predictors of ICU readmission included discharge APS >40 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.7; p < .0001), admission to the ICU from a general medicine ward (Floor) (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.6; p < .0001), and transfer to the ICU from other hospital (Transfer) (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3-2.3; p < .01). The overall model calibration and discrimination were (H-L chi2 = 3.8, df = 8; p = .85) and (receiver operating characteristic 0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients readmitted to medical ICUs have significantly higher hospital lengths of stay and mortality. ICU readmissions may be more common among patients who respond poorly to treatment as measured by increased severity of illness at first ICU discharge and failure of prior therapy at another hospital or on a general medicine unit. Tertiary care ICUs may have higher than expected readmission rates and mortalities, even when accounting for severity of illness, if they care for significant numbers of transferred patients.     

Identification of low-risk monitor patients within a medical-surgical intensive care unit

We studied the hospital course of 1148 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) admissions to test the feasibility of identifying patients suitable for early transfer. Based on the type of treatment each admission received during the initial 16 hours in ICU, we divided the patients into active treatment or monitored categories. Which of the 513 monitored admissions received active treatment before discharge was analyzed with a multivariate logistic regression analysis, using variables such as age, sex, indication for admission, and a new severity-of-illness scale. The most important variable in identifying low-risk monitored patients was the severity of illness measure, which performed well in both estimation and validation data sets. Within the 513 monitored admissions, 154 had predicted risks of requiring active intensive therapy of less than 5 per cent. Only five persons actually received such treatment. This approach might assist in reducing the ever-increasing demand for intensive care.     

Mortality and quality of life after intensive care for critical illness

Early and late mortality of 313 ICU patients and the quality of life of 118 long term ICU survivors was studied to assess the effectiveness of intensive care for critically ill patients. The survival rate at discharge from the ICU was 76%, falling to 61% at 6 months and to 58% at 1 year. A simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) was recorded on ICU admission, as well as age, length of ICU-stay and the number of complications during intensive care. Information on housing, drug use, hospital admissions, physical condition and functional status 2 years after ICU discharge was collected by means of a questionnaire. No changes in housing occurred, but drug use and the number of hospital admissions were significantly increased. In 21% of the patients a deteriorated physical condition was found, 77% remained unchanged and 2% were improved 2 years after ICU discharge, compared to their condition prior to the acute illness. Major functional impairment was found in 38% of the patients. Although the longterm physical condition and functional status correlated with SAPS and age on ICU admission, the best indicator for quality of life after intensive care proved to be the health status prior to the acute illness.     

A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units

Introduction

Intensive care unit (ICU) costs account for up to 20% of a hospital's costs. We aimed to analyse the individual patient-related cost of intensive care at various hospital levels and for different groups of disease.

Methods

Data from 51 ICUs all over Germany (15 primary care hospitals and 14 general care hospitals, 10 maximal care hospitals and 12 focused care hospitals) were collected in an observational, cross-sectional, one-day point prevalence study by two external study physicians (January–October 2003). All ICU patients (length of stay > 24 hours) treated on the study day were included. The reason for admission, severity of illness, surgical/diagnostic procedures, resource consumption, ICU/hospital length of stay, outcome and ICU staffing structure were documented.

Results

Altogether 453 patients were included. ICU (hospital) mortality was 12.1% (15.7%). The reason for admission and the severity of illness differed between the hospital levels of care, with a higher amount of unscheduled surgical procedures and patients needing mechanical ventilation in maximal care hospital and focused care hospital facilities. The mean total costs per day were €791 ± 305 (primary care hospitals, €685 ± 234; general care hospitals, €672 ± 199; focused care hospitals, €816 ± 363; maximal care hospitals, €923 ± 306), with the highest cost in septic patients (€1,090 ± 422). Differences were associated with staffing, the amount of prescribed drugs/blood products and diagnostic procedures.

Conclusion

The reason for admission, the severity of illness and the occurrence of severe sepsis are directly related to the level of ICU cost. A high fraction of costs result from staffing (up to 62%). Specialized and maximum care hospitals treat a higher proportion of the more severely ill and most expensive patients.     

Severity of illness and risk of readmission to intensive care: A meta-analysis

BackgroundAlmost one in every 10 patients who survive intensive care will be readmitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the same hospitalisation. The association between increasing severity of illness (widely calculated in ICU patients) with risk of readmission to ICU has not been systematically summarized.ObjectiveThe meta-analysis was designed to combine information from published studies to assess the relationship between severity of illness in ICU patients and the risk of readmission to ICU during the same hospitalisation.Data sourcesStudies were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980–2008), and CINAHL (1982 to August 2008).Review methodsStudies included only adult populations, readmissions to ICU during the same hospitalisation and reports of valid severity of illness index.ResultsEleven studies (totaling 220 000 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Severity of illness (APACHE II, APACHE III, SAPS and SAPS II) measured at the time of ICU admission or discharge, was higher in patients readmitted to the ICU during the same hospitalisation compared to patients not-readmitted (both p-values < 0.001). The risk of readmission to ICU increased by 43% with each standard deviation increase in severity of illness score (regardless if measured on admission to, or discharge from the ICU) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3–1.6).ConclusionsA relationship between increasing intensive care severity of illness and risk of readmission to ICU was found. The effect was the same regardless of the time of measurement of severity of illness (at admission to ICU or the time of discharge from ICU). However, further research is required to develop more comprehensive tools to identify patients at risk of readmission to ICU to allow the targeted interventions, such as ICU-outreach to follow-up these patients to minimize adverse events.     

Venous thromboembolism in critical illness in a community intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be a life-threatening complication of critical illness. Venous thromboembolism rates observed depend on the population studied, the screening modality used, and thromboprophylaxis prescribed. Few studies report on the rates of clinically diagnosed VTE in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize the incidence of clinically diagnosed VTE, prophylactic strategies used, and diagnostic studies ordered in a critically ill population at a tertiary community intensive care unit (ICU), both during and after their ICU stay. METHODS: We did a retrospective chart review of 600 consecutive critically ill patients admitted to a tertiary community ICU. RESULTS: Fifty (8.3%) patients developed VTE over the course of their ICU and hospital stay (18 [3.0%] patients during their ICU stay and 32 [5.7% of 561 ICU survivors] patients after ICU discharge). By ICU admission diagnosis, most events occurred in neurosurgical patients, although this group comprised only 24.8% of the population. Across all subgroups, most VTE events occurred after ICU discharge. Intensive care unit patients received thromboprophylaxis 87.6% (95% confidence interval, 81.5-93.7) of the time spent in ICU. However, thromboprophylaxis was administered significantly less often after transfer to the ward compared with within the ICU (from 87.6% to 59.8%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The rates of clinically diagnosed VTE rates in critically ill patients are substantial. Venous thromboembolism occurs before, during, and after ICU discharge. Continued vigilance and thromboprophylaxis are warranted across the continuum of critical illness.     

Multicentre study of delirium in ICU patients using a simple screening tool.

Traditionally, intensive care unit (ICU) delirium was viewed as benign and was under-diagnosed in the absence of ICU-appropriate screening tools. Research suggests that up to half of all ICU patients experiencing delirium will continue to do so after discharge to the ward, and half of those experiencing delirium in the ward will die within 1 year of delirium diagnosis. ICU-specific screening tools are now available. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of delirium in ICU and explore its associations to clinical factors and outcomes. A secondary aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC). A total of 185 patients in six ICUs in Australia and New Zealand were screened for delirium using the ICDSC over two 12-hour periods per day for the duration of their ICU admission. Some 84 patients (45%) developed delirium. Development of delirium was associated with increased severity of illness (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation--APACHE II--and sequential organ failure assessment--SOFA), ICU length of stay (LOS), and use of psycho-active drugs. Delirious patients showed no statistically significant difference in ICU and hospital mortality rates, nor prolonged hospital LOS. The ICDSC was found to be user-friendly. The incidence of delirium, observed characteristics and outcomes for patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand ICUs for > 36 hours without any history of altered mental state fell in the mid-range and were generally consistent with previous literature. An ICU-specific delirium assessment, such as the ICDSC, should be included in routine ICU observations to minimise under-diagnosis of this serious phenomenon.     

Is intensive care worth it? An assessment of input and outcome for the critically ill

The high cost of treatment in an ICU is clearly recognized; the ultimate benefit of that care in prolonging meaningful life is not as well quantified. We evaluated 337 mixed medical-surgical ICU patients for severity of illness and intensity of therapy and assessed their survival and quality of life 16 to 20 months after discharge. Mortality was 36.9% for emergency surgical and medical patients and 13.9% for elective surgical patients. A total of 140 patients responded to follow-up; 62.2% of patients not retired or homemakers were working full-time. Quality of life was good using both subjective and objective standards. There were few significant differences between elective surgical and other patients. Survival and life quality were related inversely to severity of illness and cost of treatment. Acute health on ICU admission predicted survival well; chronic health and age were better predictors of life quality.     

Post-ICU mortality in critically ill infected patients: an international study

Objective To determine the incidence and risk factors for post-ICU mortality in patients with infection.Design and setting International observational cohort study including 28 ICUs in eight countries.Patients All 1,872 patients discharged alive from the ICU over a 1-year period were screened for infection at ICU admission and daily throughout the ICU stay. Outcomes at ICU and hospital discharge were recorded.Measurements and results Post-ICU death occurred in 195 (10.4%) patients and was associated in the multivariable analysis with age, chronic respiratory failure, immunosuppression, cirrhosis, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II on the first day with infection, and LOD score at ICU discharge. Post-ICU death was more common among medical patients and patients with hospital-acquired infection or microbiologically documented infection and was less common in patients with pneumonia.Conclusions Post-ICU death in patients with infection was within previously reported ranges in overall ICU populations. The main risk factors were patient and infection characteristics, severity at ICU admission, and persistent organ dysfunction at ICU discharge. Further interventions such as further ICU management, discharge to a step-down unit, or follow-up by intensivists on the ward should be evaluated in patients with a high risk of post-ICU mortalityElectronic Supplementary Material Electronic supplementary material to this paper can be obtained by using the Springer Link server located at .Supported by an educational grant from Roche.     

Using a severity of illness scoring system to assess intensive care unit admissions for diabetic ketoacidosis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriateness of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for patients with the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at our institution. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care inner-city hospital. SUBJECTS: All subjects admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) from September 1996 to June 1997 with a diagnosis of DKA were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A grading system for the severity of DKA (grades 0-IV) from a previously published work was modified. Admissions to the MICU that were deemed appropriate a priori included patients with grade III or IV DKA, patients with grade II DKA who were older than 65 yrs of age, or patients with special situations normally warranting intensive care. MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-seven cases of DKA were reviewed. Two thirds of the patients had type I diabetes mellitus, and approximately 50% were men. No deaths occurred. Forty-four patients (66%) met the a priori ICU admission criteria. The average hospital stay for all patients was 4.2 (+/-3.6) days. The mean ICU stay was significantly longer in those with DKA grade III or IV, although the total hospital stay did not differ by severity of illness score. CONCLUSIONS: One third of the patients admitted to our MICU to receive treatment for DKA did not warrant ICU treatment based on the admission criteria. These individuals had an approximate MICU length of stay of 1 day. A prospective study of the severity of illness score will be undertaken to evaluate the safety, validity, and potential resource savings of applying these DKA ICU admission criteria within our institution.     

Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: A systematic review of the literature

Objective: To determine how the quality of life (QOL) of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors compares with the general population, changes over time, and is predicted by baseline characteristics. Design: Systematic literature review including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies measured QOL 30 days after ICU discharge using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36), EuroQol-5D, Sickness Impact Profile, or Nottingham Health Profile in representative populations of adult ICU survivors. Disease-specific studies were excluded. Measurements and results: Of 8,894 citations identified, 21 independent studies with 7,320 patients were reviewed. Three of three studies found that ICU survivors had significantly lower QOL prior to admission than did a matched general population. During post-discharge follow-up, ICU survivors had significantly lower QOL scores than the general population in each SF-36 domain (except bodily pain) in at least four of seven studies. Over 1–12 months of follow-up, at least two of four studies found clinically meaningful improvement in each SF-36 domain except mental health and general health perceptions. A majority of studies found that age and severity of illness predicted physical functioning. Conclusions: Compared with the general population, ICU survivors report lower QOL prior to ICU admission. After hospital discharge, QOL in ICU survivors improves but remains lower than general population levels. Age and severity of illness are predictors of physical functioning. This systematic review provides a general understanding of QOL following critical illness and can serve as a standard of comparison for QOL studies in specific ICU subpopulationsAn erratum to this article can be found at     

Long-term mortality after critical care: what is the starting point?

Mortality is still the most assessed outcome in the critically ill patient and is routinely used as the primary end-point in intervention trials, cohort studies, and benchmarking analysis. Despite this, interest in patient-centered prognosis after ICU discharge is increasing, and several studies report quality of life and long-term outcomes after critical illness. In a recent issue of Critical Care, Cuthbertson and colleagues reported interesting results from a cohort of 439 patients with sepsis, who showed high ongoing long-term mortality rates after severe sepsis, reaching 61% at 5 years (from a starting point of ICU admission). Follow-up may start at ICU admission, after ICU discharge, or after hospital discharge. Using ICU admission as a starting point will include patients with a wide range of illness severities and reasons for ICU admission. As a result, important consequences of the ICU, such as rehabilitation and reduced quality of life, may be diluted in an unselected population. ICU discharge is another frequently used starting point. ICU discharge is a marker of better outcome and reduced risk for acute deterioration, making this an interesting starting point for studying long-term mortality, need for ICU readmission, and critical illness rehabilitation. Finally, using hospital discharge as the starting point will include patients with the minimal requirements to sustain an adequate condition in a non-monitored environment but will add a ?survivors bias?; that is, patients who survive critical illness are a special group among the critically ill. In this commentary, we discuss the heterogeneity in long-term mortality from recent studies in critical care medicine ? heterogeneity that may be a consequence simply of changing the follow-up starting point ? and propose a standardized follow-up starting point for future studies according to the outcome of interest.     

The epidemiology of acute respiratory failure in hospitalized patients: a Brazilian prospective cohort study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess risk factors associated with the development of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and death in a general intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials and Methods

Adults who were hospitalized at 12 surgical and nonsurgical ICUs were prospectively followed up. Multivariable analyses were realized to determine the risk factors for ARF and point out the prognostic factors for mortality in these patients.

Results

A total of 1732 patients were evaluated, with an ARF prevalence of 57%. Of the 889 patients who were admitted without ARF, 141 (16%) developed this syndrome in the ICU. The independent risk factors for developing ARF were 64 years of age or older, longer time between hospital and ICU admission, unscheduled surgical or clinical reason for ICU admission, and severity of illness. Of the 984 patients with ARF, 475 (48%) died during the ICU stay. Independent prognostic factors for death were age older than 64 years, time between hospital and ICU admission of more than 4 days, history of hematologic malignancy or AIDS, the development of ARF in ICU, acute lung injury, and severity of illness.

Conclusions

Acute respiratory failure represents a large percentage of all ICU patients, and the high mortality is related to some preventable factors such as the time to ICU admission.