Alcoholic beverage consumption and breast cancer incidence

Recent case-control studies have suggested that alcohol consumption may be associated with breast cancer incidence. This report is a retrospective cohort study of over 95,000 women who were members of the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Northern California. The stated alcohol consumption of these women was recorded at a multiphasic screening examination taken from 1964 to 1972 prior to any diagnosis of breast cancer. The incidence of breast cancer in this cohort was greater for women who drank, and among these drinkers, incidence increased in an irregular trend with heavier alcohol consumption. Control for the effects of race, education, smoking, and reproductive variables related to breast cancer all but eliminated the overall increased relative risk of drinkers compared with that of nondrinkers. However, the relatively small group of women who stated that they had three or more alcoholic drinks per day (5.2 per cent of the total) had a significantly elevated relative risk of 1.4 (p = 0.035) compared with nondrinkers, despite control for all available confounding variables. No significant interaction effect of smoking and alcohol was found. Women who had less than three drinks per day had no increased relative risk over nondrinkers. The results of this study might be explained either by an unrecognized carcinogenic effect of alcohol on breast tissue or by the confounding effect of other factors associated with heavy alcohol use.     

A case-control study of alcoholic beverage consumption and breast cancer

In many studies, moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with increases in the risk of breast cancer of about 50-100%. The authors examined recent alcoholic beverage consumption in relation to the risk of breast cancer in a case-control study of women aged less than 70 years, conducted in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, from 1982 to 1986: 607 breast cancer cases identified in a cancer hospital were compared with 1,214 controls matched to the cases on neighborhood and decade of age. The subjects were interviewed at home. Confounding factors were controlled by conditional logistic regression. The relative risk estimates for women who consumed alcohol, relative to women who drank less than one alcoholic beverage (drink) per month, were close to 1.0: for women who drank at least one alcoholic beverage per day, the multivariate estimate was 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.6-1.2). Among subgroups of women, including those at low baseline risk, there was also no association. For a subset of cases compared with hospital controls, once again there was no association. The relative risk (RR) estimate was elevated for women who drank at least one beer daily (RR = 1.7) and reduced for women who drank at least one glass of wine daily (RR = 0.7), but neither estimate was statistically significant. The results suggest that recent alcohol consumption does not influence the risk of breast cancer. Selection bias cannot be ruled out, however. In addition, because determinants of alcohol use are not well understood, control of confounding may have been incomplete in the present study and in other observational studies of alcohol and breast cancer.     

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: a French case-control study

The relationship between the risk of breast cancer and oral contraceptive use was investigated in a case-control study conducted in France between 1983 and 1987 in five public hospitals. Some 464 cases aged 25 to 56 years and 542 matched controls were interviewed about their history of the use of oral contraceptives (OC). Results are given for the entire population and for the subgroup of 358 and 379 premenopausal cases and controls. The multivariate relative risk estimate, for ever user, was 1.5 (p less than 0.01) in the whole group as well as in the premenopausal subgroup (p less than 0.02). However, there was no evidence that the effect varied appreciably according to duration of use, age at first use, use before first full-term pregnancy (FFTP) and time since first or last use. The risk was not altered for any particular brand of OC. We conclude that, because of the widespread attention given to the relationship between OC use and breast cancer, information bias might be responsible for part of the excess in risk observed among OC ever users.     

An epidemiological case-control study of breast cancer and alcohol consumption

A case-control study of breast cancer and alcohol consumption was conducted with 1617 patients diagnosed with a primary cancer of the breast between 1982 and 1984 in 18 New York State counties. For each case, one control, matched for year of birth and county of residence, was selected from the driver's license files of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. Breast cancer risk was shown to increase as daily consumption of alcohol increased, with a risk of 1.37 (95% Cl = 1.07, 1.75) observed among women who consumed 15 or more grams of alcohol per day. Breast cancer risk did not appear to be related to the total number of years a woman drank or to be restricted to specific types of alcoholic beverages. The data suggest that this may be higher in women who began drinking at a later age. The increased risk associated with alcohol consumption, observed in the current study, persisted within strata of various breast cancer risk factors.     

Risk factors for breast cancer according to age at diagnosis in a French case-control study

In a French case-control study of 1010 women with breast cancer and 1950 controls with nonmalignant disease, the variations of the effects of 8 risk factors for breast cancer as a function of age at diagnosis, were analysed by tests of homogeneity and trend. The risks associated with a late age at first full-term pregnancy and with nulliparity were different between age-groups (test of homogeneity: p = 0.03), and the highest risks for these two factors were observed in women 45-54 years old. The risks associated with Quetelet index were also found to vary with age at diagnosis (test for trend: p = 0.008). A high Quetelet index decreased the risk of breast cancer in the younger age-groups; this decrease of risk became progressively less important with advancing age, and no such effect was found in the oldest age-group. Inverse results were observed for a tall stature (test for trend: p = 0.04): a tall stature increased the risk of breast cancer in the younger age-groups, and the figures suggested a reverse effect in the oldest group. No large variation with age was found for the effects of age at menarche, history of breast cancer death in mother or sisters, prior biopsy for benign breast disease, and weight. In conclusion, the relative importance of certain risk factors for breast cancer is closely related to age at diagnosis. Nulliparity and a late age at first birth appear to be major risk factors only for middle-aged women, whereas a low Quetelet index and a tall stature appear to increase the risk of breast cancer only for younger women.     

Occupational risk factors of lung cancer in a French case-control study

A case-control study of 1625 histologically confirmed cases of lung cancer and 3091 controls matched for sex, age, hospital admission, and interviewer was conducted in France between 1976 and 1980. The results presented concern the effects of different occupations on the occurrence of lung cancer among 1334 male cases and 2409 matched controls. Occupations were coded blindly according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations. An excess risk of lung cancer was observed for the following occupations after adjustment for cigarette exposure: farmers (RR = 1.24, p less than 0.06), miners and quarrymen (RR = 2.14, p less than 0.02), plumbers and pipe fitters (RR = 1.80, p less than 0.04), motor vehicle drivers (RR = 1.42, p less than 0.01).     

Oral contraceptive and breast cancer: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between breast cancer and the duration of use of oral contraceptives (OC), and age it started to be used in a population of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. METHODS: There were identified 250 incident cases of breast cancer in patients aged 20 to 60 years from records of pathology laboratories and there were enrolled 1,020 controls drawn from hospital and neighbourhood population. For 90 cases identified in Pelotas, 270 hospital controls and 270 neighbourhood controls were selected, for another 78 cases in Pelotas, 234 controls were selected, and for 82 cases from other municipalities, 246 hospital controls were selected. Controls were matched by age. Adjusted analysis was performed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: No association between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer was found (OR=1.1;CI95% 0.7 - 1.6 for hospital controls, and OR=0.9;CI95% 0.6 - 1.6 for neighbourhood controls) neither for different duration of use or starting age. To increase the test power, 250 cases and all 1020 controls were analyzed together, and an odds ratio of 1.6 (CI95% 1.0 - 2.4) was found for women older than 45 years of age who had been using oral contraceptives for five years or more. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found of a general association between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer. When analyzing the whole date set, with all neighbourhood and hospital controls together, for women older than 45 years of age who had been using oral contraceptives for more than 5 years, it was found an increased risk almost statistically significant (p=0.05).     

Infertility and breast cancer: a population-based case-control study

To investigate whether a history of infertility affects a woman's risk of developing breast cancer, the authors analyzed case-control data collected between 1980 and 1982 as part of the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. The 4,730 cases were women aged 20-54 years with a first diagnosis of breast cancer ascertained from eight population-based cancer registries; the 4,688 controls were women randomly selected from the general population of these same eight areas. After controlling for age, age at first birth, and parity, the odds ratio (OR) for breast cancer associated with infertility was 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.15) among gravid women. Controlling for age, the odds ratio was 0.82 (95% CI 0.59-1.14) among nulligravid women. Women who reported that the reason for their infertility was a problem with their ovaries had a risk similar to that for women without a history of infertility (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.24). Women whose physicians reported that the reason for their infertility was anovulation or Stein-Leventhal syndrome also had risks similar to those for women without a history of infertility (OR = 1.26 (95% CI 0.67-2.34) and OR = 1.13 (95% CI 0.46-2.78), respectively). Menopausal status, age at menarche, history of spontaneous abortions, drinking or smoking behavior, use of exogenous hormones, or family history of breast cancer did not appreciably alter the observed odds ratios. If infertility has an effect on breast cancer that is independent of age at first birth, then the effect is small.     

Alcoholic beverage consumption and the risk of endometrial cancer. Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group

Previous studies have suggested that alcoholic beverage consumption may lead to a decrease in a woman's oestrogen levels. It is possible that any such alcohol-associated decrease could lead to a decrease in endometrial cancer risk. To study the association between alcohol consumption and endometrial cancer, we examined data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, a multi-centre, population based, case-control study. A total of 351 women with primary epithelial endometrial cancer and 2247 women selected from the same geographical areas as the cases were interviewed for the study. As part of the interview, the participants provided information regarding their alcohol consumption during the preceding five years. Analysis of these data revealed that women who were non-drinkers had a risk of endometrial cancer of 1.83 relative to the risk of women who had consumed an average of 150 grams or more of alcohol per week (95% Cl, 1.11, 3.01). Women who drank, but who consumed less than 150 grams of alcohol per week, were at an intermediate risk. The increased risk associated with abstinence from alcohol consumption was particularly great in overweight women and was virtually absent in lean women. These results argue that alcohol ingestion may reduce a woman's risk of endometrial cancer, particularly if she is overweight.     

Occupational risk factors of lung cancer in a French case-control study.

A case-control study of 1625 histologically confirmed cases of lung cancer and 3091 controls matched for sex, age, hospital admission, and interviewer was conducted in France between 1976 and 1980. The results presented concern the effects of different occupations on the occurrence of lung cancer among 1334 male cases and 2409 matched controls. Occupations were coded blindly according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations. An excess risk of lung cancer was observed for the following occupations after adjustment for cigarette exposure: farmers (RR = 1.24, p less than 0.06), miners and quarrymen (RR = 2.14, p less than 0.02), plumbers and pipe fitters (RR = 1.80, p less than 0.04), motor vehicle drivers (RR = 1.42, p less than 0.01).     

Alcoholic calories, red wine consumption and breast cancer among premenopausal women

The role of alcohol consumption (alcoholic calories, alcoholic beverages) on breast cancer risk was investigated in a case-control study of 154 premenopausal female patients diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma. For each case, one control was matched for age (± 3 years) and socio-economic status. The survey was carried out in Northeastern France (Lorraine) between 1986 and 1989. While taking into account total caloric intakes and various breast cancer factors, breast cancer risk was shown to increase as consumption of alcohol increased (p value for trend = 0.007). A significant relative risk (RR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.40–5.17) was shown above 60 kcal per day (approximately 9 g of alcohol per day). Breast cancer risk appeared to be restricted to red wine consumption among these premenopausal women, for monthly consumption (p value for trend = 0.003) as well as for duration of consumption (p value for trend = 0.01). A relative risk of 3.96 (95% CI: 1.59–9.84) was found for a monthly consumption higher than 4 liters per month. This reinforces the notion of a particular sensitivity of young women to breast cancer in relation to alcohol consumption.     

体力活动与女性乳腺癌发病关系的病例对照研究

目的 探讨体力活动与乳腺癌发病的关系。方法 采用以医院为基础的病例对照研究,调查某大学2所附属医院2012年4月~2014年12月间确诊的25～70岁549例乳腺癌患者和同期同医院就诊的549例非肿瘤患者的体力活动情况和相关危险因素。采用非条件Logistic回归模型分析体力活动与乳腺癌发病的关系。结果 校正各种混杂因素后,非职业性体力活动与乳腺癌发病风险降低有关（OR=0.69,95% CI：0.48～1.00）;与不参加体育活动者相比,参加体育活动对乳腺癌发病有保护作用（OR=0.61,95% CI：0.43～0.87）;与久坐不动的职业相比,轻度职业活动对乳腺癌发病有保护作用（OR=0.67,95% CI：0.47～0.97）,而家务活动与乳腺癌发病风险无关。不同雌激素受体（estrogen receptor,ER）和孕激素受体（progesterone receptor,PR）状态的亚组分析中,非职业性体力活动与ER+/PR+乳腺癌的发病风险降低有关。结论 非职业性体力活动、体育活动和轻度职业活动对女性乳腺癌有保护作用。     

Breastfeeding and breast cancer: a case-control study in Southern Brazil

To investigate the relationship between breastfeeding and breast cancer in Southern Brazil, a case-control design was employed, with two age-matched control groups. A total of 250 cases of breast cancer were identified in women from 20 to 60 years of age, with 1,020 hospital and community controls. The main study variables were occurrence of breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding. A multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was employed. According to the results, breastfeeding did not have a protective effect against breast cancer. The odds ratio (OR) for women who breastfed was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.8-1.2) compared to women who did not breastfeed. For women who breastfed for six months or less, the OR was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.6-1.8). In pre-menopausal women who breastfed for more than 25 months, the OR was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.5-3.5), and in post-menopausal women OR was 1.27 (95% CI: 0.5-3.1), compared to women who had not breastfeed.     

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: a case-control study

The association between breast cancer risk and oral contraceptive use was examined in 401 breast cancer patients and 519 hospital controls interviewed in New York City during 1979-1981. Control subjects were ascertained utilizing variable ratio matching to the cases (2:1 or 1:1) by sex, age, hospital, and time of diagnosis. No evidence of a positive association was found between cancer risk and the duration of use in either parous or nulliparous women. The odds ratios obtained by comparing users to non-users in women under 50 years of age after adjusting for other risk factors were 0.8 (95% CI = 0.4-1.4) for less than five years duration and 0.4 (95% CI = 0.2-0.8) for five or more years duration (P less than 0.05 when tested for decreasing trend). There was also no evidence of effect modification between oral contraceptive use and other breast cancer risk factors (viz. family history, nulliparity, late age at first pregnancy, or abstention from breastfeeding). Our results do not indicate that the use of oral contraceptives increases the risk of breast cancer.     

Bladder cancer and alcoholic beverage consumption

A population-based case-control study of bladder cancer was conducted in 10 geographic areas in the United States. Risk of bladder cancer was not related to overall alcohol intake, nor to amounts of wine, beer, or spirits consumed. Alcohol also did not interact with known or suspected bladder carcinogens to increase risk, and no evidence was found that indirect mechanisms associated with alcohol ingestion the risk of bladder cancer.     

Meat consumption and risk of stomach cancer in Uruguay: a case-control study

We previously reported an association between meat intake and stomach cancer in Uruguay: in that analysis, we did not control for total energy intake. To better study the relationship between intake of meat and meat constituents and gastric cancer, we conducted a further case-control study including 123 cases and 282 controls who were enrolled between September 1997 and August 1999. Total meat intake (highest tertile) was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.3-9.0]. After adjustment for total energy intake and intake of proteins and total fat by the residuals method, the OR was 1.7 (95% CI = 0.7-4.0). The energy-adjusted OR for high intake of processed meat was 1.9 (95% CI = 1.1-3.5). Intake of fried, barbecued, and salted meat and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine was not associated with risk of gastric cancer. The energy-adjusted OR of high intake of nitrosodimethylamine was 1.5 (95% CI = 0.9-2.8). These results suggest that, in a country with elevated meat consumption, total energy intake and intake of proteins and fat are powerful confounders in the relationship between meat intake and gastric cancer risk. However, a modest independent effect of meat, in particular of processed meat, is suggested.     

Colorectal cancer and the consumption of foods: a case-control study in Belgium

A case-control study on 453 cases with colon cancer, 365 with rectal cancer, and 2,851 population controls was carried out in two Belgian provinces known to differ in certain dietary habits, particularly with regard to the use of butter. All raw vegetables had a clear protective effect for both colon and rectal cancer; bread was also protective for colon cancer. Starchy foods and foods rich in oligosaccharides (sugar) caused an increased risk for both colon and rectal cancer. No other foods were found to have a systematic effect in both sexes and in both provinces, either in one direction or in the other, except for maize, soybean, and sunflower oils, which were clearly protective in all cases. Among the foods contributing to the intake of fats, there was no effect either for butter, margarine, or fatty meats; the only clear-cut protective effect was that of the oils having a high polyunsaturated-to-saturated ratio. These findings are consistent with our previous findings on the role nutrients play in the relationship with colon and rectal cancers.     

Urinary titanium and vanadium and breast cancer: a case-control study

Titanium and vanadium are essential trace elements. This study examined the associations of urinary titanium and vanadium with breast cancer risk in a hospital-based case-control study comprising 240 women with incident breast cancer, and 246 cancer-free and age-matched controls who attended health screening assessments in 2 affiliated hospitals of Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou between October 2009 and July 2010. Survey data and urine specimens were collected before treatment for the patients and after interview for the controls. The urinary concentrations of titanium and vanadium were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Women in the second and the highest tertile of vanadium showed 64% and 40% decreased risk of breast cancer, respectively, when compared with those in the lowest tertile after adjustment for established risk factors of breast cancer (ORs [95%CI]: 0.36 [0.21-0.60] and 0.60 [0.37-0.97], respectively). In contrast, urinary titanium was not significantly related to a decreased risk of breast cancer. These results have potentially significant implications on nutritional chemoprevention of breast cancer and the development of new anticancer drugs. Further replications of the study are recommended, and the biological mechanisms warrant clarification.