Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: complications and suggestions to avoid them

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes have become an excellent alternative for the long-term management of patients with proximal obstructions of the gastrointestinal tract. However, their use has limitations and can be associated with serious complications. We therefore studied the frequency and severity of complications related to the use of PEG tubes in our clinic. DESIGN: All adults (aged 18 years and above) in whom a PEG tube was placed between January 1 1994 and January 1 1999 at the Free University Hospital in Amsterdam were included in this study. In initial cases, the indication and procedure were individually judged according to a liberal protocol. However, after several major complications, a strict procedure protocol was implemented in September 1996. RESULTS: During the study period, 263 PEG tubes were placed in 254 patients with head and neck cancer (n = 183; 70%), neurological disorders (n = 52; 20%) or severe upper gastrointestinal motility disorders (n = 28; 11%). In period I, 167 PEG tubes were placed and in period II, 96 PEG tubes were inserted. Patients were followed for a median 111 days. Minor complications occurred in 13% of the patients. Major complications occurred in 8% of the patients. In period I, the percentage of major complications was higher than in period II (9.5% versus 6%). CONCLUSION: PEG tube placement is a safe procedure when performed according to strict guidelines. By doing so, PEG tubes allow optimal feeding for prolonged periods with the occasional need for replacement of the tube. PEG tubes should not be introduced in acutely ill patients, patients with a short life expectancy and preferably not to patients with severe coughing.     

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement for End-stage Palliation of Malignant Gastrointestinal Obstructions

Background/Aim:

Decompression of malignant gastrointestinal obstructions is an uncommon indication for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of venting PEG tubes in relieving nausea and vomiting and assessing complications associated with tube placement.

Patients and Methods:

This study is a retrospective chart review of patients with PEG tubes placed to decompress malignant gastrointestinal obstructions between January 2005 and September 2010 by the gastroenterology service at our institute. Patient demographics, symptom relief, procedural complications, diet tolerability and home palliation were reviewed.

Results:

Seven PEG tubes were inserted to decompress malignant gastrointestinal obstructions. The mean patient age was 62 years (range 37-82 years). The underlying primary malignancies were small intestine (1), appendiceal (1), pancreatic (2), and colon (3) cancer. Gastric outlet obstruction was present in 3 (43%) patients while small bowel obstruction occurred in 4 (57%) patients. There was relief of nausea and vomiting in 6 (86%) patients. Procedural complications were present in 1 (14%) patient and involved superficial cellulitis followed by peristomal leakage. Patients with gastric outlet obstruction continued to have limited oral intake while patients with small bowel obstruction tolerated varying degrees of oral nutrition. Six (86%) patients were discharged home after PEG tube placement, but only 2 (33%) were able to undergo end-stage palliation at home without re-admission for hospital palliation.

Conclusions:

Venting PEG tubes significantly reduce the symptoms of nausea and vomiting in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal obstruction due to primary gastrointestinal malignancies. Complications associated with tube placement were minimal.     

Technical modifications for improving the success rate of PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) benefit from nutritional support by means of PEG tubes, but endoscopy may be impossible when there is partial or complete trismus and/or stenosis or occlusion of the upper aerodigestive tract. METHODS: PEG tubes were placed in 277 patients with HNC. Oral insertion of an endoscope into the esophagus was impossible in 27 patients. Transnasal endoscopy was performed (n = 4). In the cases of high-grade tumor obstruction, the endoscope was introduced into the esophagus through a straight laryngoscope (n = 9). When upper aerodigestive tract occlusion was present, endoscopy with PEG placement was successfully performed during surgery by means of the opened pharynx after tumor resection (n = 12). RESULTS: In 25 of the 27 cases PEG tubes could be placed by using the above alternative techniques. There were no immediate complications, and no complications occurred within 30 days of PEG placement. CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal, straight laryngoscopic, or intraoperative open endoscopy can improve the success rate for PEG tube placement in patients with HNC.     

Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Jejunostomy

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) used to supply enteral nutrition has supplanted surgically placed feeding tubes in many institutions. These tubes are currently placed in: 1) patients with reversible disease with potential for recovery (stroke, Guillain-Barré syndrome); 2) patients with incurable disease with potential for extended survival (head and neck cancer, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis); or 3) patients who are terminal or seriously debilitated (head trauma, systemic malignancies). Few data are currently available regarding long-term survival, survival difference between various patient populations, and incidence of recovery of oral intake with subsequent PEG tube removal. In this study, records of 191 patients in whom PEG tubes were placed were retrospectively reviewed and information collected regarding underlying diseases (malignant vs nonmalignant), survival, and incidence of subsequent tube removal. Of the patients, 68 (36%) had cancer, and 123 (64%) had benign disease (usually stroke or other neurologic disorder). Survival curve analysis demonstrated that one-third of patients were dead within 60 days of PEG placement, and half were dead in the first 6 months. Total deaths were 115 (60%) at a median time of 164 days. No mortality was directly related to acute or subsequent PEG tube complications. Feeding tubes were removed in 41 patients (21%), 10 with cancer (5%), and 31 without (16%, p less than 0.05). These data on limited patient survival and low incidence of recovery of oral intake suggest that facilitation of hospital discharge into a less expensive home care or step-down facility is the most likely goal to be realized after PEG placement. Further, these results raise questions regarding the appropriateness of PEG placement in patients with anticipated early mortality or low likelihood of hospital discharge.     

Prospective Trial Evaluating Early Initiation of Feeding in Patients with Newly Placed One-Step Button Gastrostomy Devices

The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the feasibility and safety of early feeding in patients with newly placed one-step button (OSB) gastrostomy devices. Twenty-five patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic button gastrostomy placement were prospectively enrolled. The patients underwent radiographic assessment (Gastrografin gastrograms) 3 hr after gastrostomy placement. Contrast extravasation was not documented in any patient. Aside from one patient who aspirated the contrast solution after the radiologic study, all others (96%) were successfully fed on the day the gastrostomy buttons were placed. In this prospective study of patients with newly placed OSB gastrostomy devices, early initiation of feeding was feasible and safe. In a fashion similar to their tube-style counterparts, button gastrostomy devices provide adequate apposition between the stomach and abdominal wall immediately after their initial placement.     

Single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement

AIM: To investigate whether single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is safe and to compare the complications of PEG with those reported in the literature. METHODS: Patients who underwent PEG placement between June 2001 and August 2011 at the Baskent University Alanya Teaching and Research Center were evaluated retrospectively. Patients whose PEG was placed for the first time by a single endoscopist were enrolled in the study. PEG was performed using the pull method. All of the patients were evaluated for their indications for PEG, major and minor complications resulting from PEG, nutritional status, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the use of antibiotic treatment or antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PEG. Comorbidities, rates, time and reasons for mortality were also evaluated. The reasons for PEG removal and PEG duration were also investigated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent the PEG procedure for the first time during this study. Eight patients who underwent PEG placement by 2 endoscopists were not enrolled in the study. A total of 54 patients were investigated. The patients’ mean age was 69.9 years. The most common indication for PEG was cerebral infarct, which occurred in approximately two-thirds of the patients. The mean albumin level was 3.04 ± 0.7 g/dL, and 76.2% of the patients’ albumin levels were below the normal values. The mean CRP level was high in 90.6% of patients prior to the procedure. Approximately two-thirds of the patients received antibiotics for either prophylaxis or treatment for infections prior to the PEG procedure. Mortality was not related to the procedure in any of the patients. Buried bumper syndrome was the only major complication, and it occurred in the third year. In such case, the PEG was removed and a new PEG tube was placed via surgery. Eight patients (15.1%) experienced minor complications, 6 (11.1%) of which were wound infections. All wound infections except one recovered with antibiotic treatment. Two patients had bleeding from the P     

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy:Indications,technique,complications and management

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)is the preferred route of feeding and nutritional support in patients with a functional gastrointestinal system who require long-term enteral nutrition.Besides its wellknown advantages over parenteral nutrition,PEG offers superior access to the gastrointestinal system over surgical methods.Considering that nowadays PEG tube placement is one of the most common endoscopic procedures performed worldwide,knowing its indications and contraindications is of paramount importance in current medicine.PEG tubes are sometimes placed inappropriately in patients unable to tolerate adequate oral intake because of incorrect and unrealistic understanding of their indications and what they can accomplish.Broadly,the two main indications of PEG tube placement are enteral feeding and stomach decompression.On the other hand,distal enteral obstruction,severe uncorrectable coagulopathy and hemodynamic instability constitute the main absolute contraindications for PEG tube placement in hospitalized patients.Although generally considered to be a safe procedure,there is the potential for both minor and major complications.Awareness of these potential complications,as well as understanding routine aftercare of the catheter,can improve the quality of care for patients with a PEG tube.These complications can generally be classified into three major categories:endoscopic technical difficulties,PEG procedure-related complications and late complications associated with PEG tube use and wound care.In this review we describe a variety of minor and major tube-related complications as well as strategies for their management and avoidance.Different methods of percutaneous PEG tube placement into the stomach have been described in the literature with the"pull"technique being the most common method.In the last section of this review,the reader is presented with a brief discussion of these procedures,techniques and related issues.Despite the mentioned PEG tube placement complications,this procedure has gained worldwide popularity as a safe enteral access for nutrition in patients with a functional gastrointestinal system.     

Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is the preferred method for long-term enteral feeding of patients who are unable to take food by mouth. Despite the widespread acceptance of the procedure, no large-scale study of the long-term outcomes of patients receiving PEG tubes has been reported. The objective of this study was to determine the survival of patients in whom PEG tubes are placed. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data obtained from two computerized databases. SETTING: Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. PATIENTS: Seven thousand three hundred sixty-nine patients who received a PEG tube in fiscal years 1990 through 1992. RESULTS: For the 7,369 patients, the mean age was 68.1 years and 98.6% were men. PEG tubes were most commonly placed in patients with cerebrovascular disease (18.9%), other organic neurologic disease (28.6%), or head and neck cancer (15.7%). Although the complication rate of the procedure itself was low (4%), because of the severity of their underlying disease, 1,732 patients (23.5%) died during the hospitalization in which the PEG tube was placed. The median survival of the full cohort was 7.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the widespread placement of PEG tubes in severely ill patients, half of whom are in the terminal phase of their illness. Further study is needed to determine whether these patients benefit from PEG tube placement in terms of their quality of life and survival. From the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Field Program, and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex. Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Houston Field Program. Presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, New Orleans, La., May 15–18, 1994.     

DPEJ placement in cases of PEG insertion failure

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: PEG placement is routinely used for enteral feeding; in some cases PEG is not feasible or indicated due to technical difficulties, such as gastric herniation, organ interposition, or presence of gastroparesis. In these cases, surgical gastrostomy or jejunostomy are possible alternatives; more recently, direct percutaneous jejunostomy (DPEJ) has been proposed to avoid surgical intervention. The aim of the study was to evaluate the necessity, technical feasibility and outcome of DPEJ in a group of patients consecutively proposed for PEG placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In each patient proposed for PEG placement, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, and then a pull traction removal gastrostomy tube (18-20 F) was inserted. When PEG was not feasible or contraindicated, a variable stiffness pediatric videocolonscope was used to reach the jejunum: then DPEJ was performed with the same technique and materials as PEG. In both groups enteral feeding was started 24h after the endoscopic procedure, using an enteral feeding pump and the same nutritional schedules. RESULTS: In a 1-year period 90 patients were proposed for PEG placement; PEG could not be performed for technical reasons in 8 (gastric herniation in 1; organ interposition in 7) and gastroparesis in 1. In one patient both PEG and DPEJ were not feasible for organ interposition. The duration of the endoscopic procedure was slightly longer in DPEJ (mean 20 min versus 15 min). No complications related to the endoscopic procedure were observed in both DPEJ and PEG patients. No nutritional complication were observed in the DPEJ group. CONCLUSION: In our experience, PEG was not feasible or contraindicated in about 10% of patients proposed for. In these patients, DPEJ was placed: the procedure resulted to be feasible and safe with the use of a pediatric videocolonscope to easily reach the jejunum. The insertion of DPEJ did not change the nutritional management of enteral feeding. However, long-term effects or complications remain to be evaluated in larger studies.     

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy sites infected by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on outcome

BACKGROUND: The impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) sites on morbidity and mortality is uncertain. AIM: We investigated the impact of known prior MRSA colonization on the incidence of symptomatic PEG site wound infection and mortality. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had PEG tubes inserted recently at our hospital were identified. The presence or absence of MRSA colonization before PEG placement was noted. Patients were observed for wound infection, and swabs were taken from the site if there was clinical infection. Mortality within 30 days of PEG placement was determined. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients underwent PEG placement; 23 (28%) of these patients had known MRSA colonization before PEG placement. Of these, 13 (57%) developed symptomatic MRSA infection of the PEG site. The remaining 60 patients (72%) had no known prior MRSA colonization. In these patients, 9 (15%) developed symptomatic MRSA infection of the PEG site. The overall incidence of wound infection was 37% (31) of the total undergoing PEG placement, of whom 71% (22) had developed MRSA infection. The mortality of those with symptomatic MRSA infection of the PEG site was 9% (2/22), whereas the mortality from non-MRSA-infected PEGs was 20% (12/61). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior MRSA colonization had a significantly higher risk of developing symptomatic MRSA infection of the PEG site. However, there was still a significant risk (15%) of developing MRSA infection of the PEG site for patients with no known prior MRSA infection. MRSA infection of the PEG site did not affect mortality.     

Advances in Enteral Nutrition Techniques

The increasing use of enteral nutrition in hospitals has led to an expanded role for the gastroenterologist and surgeon in providing enteral access. New concepts in immunonutrition and gut support in critically ill patients have popularized early postoperative feeding. There is an ongoing need to update physicians on the diverse enteral access techniques now available. In addition to standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) techniques, this review focuses on reflux prevention through double-lumen feeding-suction tubes, and describes the use of steerable catheters for rapid insertion of nasojejunal and PEJ tubes without endoscopy. Low-profile "button"-type devices, one-step button placement, replacement gastrostomy devices, and special enteral techniques for patients with cancer are also reviewed.     

Skin-level gastrostomy -- long-term results from a prospective trial in gastric and jejunal application

OBJECTIVE: The usefulness of skin-level gastrostomy tubes (button systems) for maintaining nutrition support after primary insertion of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is widely accepted. After first promising experiences with newly developed skin-level gastrostomy system (Freka-Button Gastrostomy) the safety and long-term stability of this new tube was not defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cohort study we prospectively evaluated from 2.1998 until 12.2001 for ease of use, complications, time to failure and long-term follow-up of 61 Freka button gastrostomies inserted in 50 patients (mean age 57.6 years, range 6 - 78 years, 44 men, 6 women). Mean time after primary PEG placement was 6.3 months (range 1 - 30 months). RESULTS: Correct application of all buttons (48 gastric, 2 jejunal) was easy and fast (median time 11 minutes) to perform. In 56 % we used a new Seldinger guide wire technique to improve stomal passage. Within the first ten days and during long-term follow-up (median 248, range 2 - 593 days) no major complication was seen. 11 systems had to be replaced mainly due to balloon failure (median 352, range 186 - 593 days). The total observation time were 15,128 days with a system failure rate of 0.26 per year. CONCLUSION: The Freka-button systems provides an easy-to-use, safe, and feasible alternative for long-term use of skin-level gastrostomy. First jejunal application of this new device was promising but needs further evaluation.     

Risk Factors for Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Background

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a commonly performed procedure for patients with severe dysphagia leading to malnutrition. Improved knowledge of risk factors for PEG-related complications might decrease patient discomfort and healthcare costs.

Aim

The aim of the present study was to investigate factors associated with complications after PEG.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for all patients referred for PEG placement from December 2002 to December 2012 in single-tertiary care center. PEG-related complications and risk factors were evaluated through chart reviews, endoscopic reports, and endoscopic and radiologic images.

Results

Among a total of 245 consecutive individuals (146 male, mean age 59.2 ± 12.6 years) enrolled, 43 major complications had developed. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with an internal bolster of a PEG tube in the upper body of stomach were at significant risk for early [OR 6.127 (95 % CI 1.447–26.046)] and late complications [OR 6.710 (95 % CI 1.692–26.603)]. Abnormal leukocyte counts [OR 3.198 (95 % CI 1.174–8.716)], stroke as an indication for PEG [OR 3.047 (95 % CI 1.174–8.882)], and PEG tube placement by an inexperienced endoscopist [OR 3.401 (95 % CI 1.073–10.779)] were significantly associated with early complications.

Conclusions

A PEG tube should not be inserted into the upper body of stomach to reduce complication risk, and PEG procedures should be performed by skilled endoscopists to prevent early complications. An abnormal leukocyte count can be a predictor of early complication, and care is needed when PEG is performed for patients with stroke.     

Long-term follow-up of consequences of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in nursing home patients

PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tubes are frequently placed in nursing home patients. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the long-term changes in functional and nutritional statuses, tube-related complications, and factors influencing survival in 46 nursing home residents, mean age 73.6 years (range 19–96). Functional status was evaluated by a standard rehabilitation medicine scale. Nutritional status was evaluated by serum albumin and cholesterol concentrations and by weight. PEG-related complications requiring hospitalization or emergency room or clinic evaluations were noted. Additionally, changes in resuscitation status were noted. The predominant indication for PEG placement was dementia (52%). At PEG placement, 48% of patients had total functional impairment. Regardless of the severity of impairment, no patient's functional status improved after PEG. Nutritional status did not improve significantly. Mortality approached 50% and 60% at 12 and 18 months, respectively, and was significantly related to age, resuscitation status, and serum albumin concentration. All patients under 40 years of age at PEG survived, in contrast to 41.3% of patients over 40 years of age (P<0.001). Sixty-three percent of patients who were full code at PEG placement survived, in contrast to 10% of no code patients (P<0.001). Albumin 3.5 g/dl at PEG or thereafter was associated with improved survival (P<0.001) as compared to albumin <3.5 g/dl. PEG-related complications occurred in 34.7% of patients, and the first occurred four months after PEG. We conclude that realistic expectations of what PEG can accomplish be a factor in the decision to place a PEG tube in nursing home patients.     

Should single-stage PEG buttons become the procedure of choice for PEG placement in children?

BACKGROUND: Single-stage PEG buttons (PEG-B) allow initial placement of a skin-level gastrostomy device for children who require enteral access. They offer significant advantages over traditionally placed PEG tubes (PEG-T) but have not been widely accepted into practice. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with PEG-Bs compared with PEG-Ts. HYPOTHESIS: PEG-B shares a similar safety profile with PEG-T but delays the need for an initial device change well beyond the change that usually occurs at 6 to 8 weeks after PEG-T placement. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. PATIENTS: All children undergoing both PEG procedures and attending our clinic from 1997 to 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Age, sex, weight, indications, postoperative complications, interval until first tube change and first tube change complications. RESULTS: Totals of 145 and 93 patients were identified in the PEG-B and PEG-T groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in the 2 groups with respect to age, weight, indications, and postoperative complications. The interval until first tube change, however, was significantly longer in the PEG-B group (314 days) than in the PEG-T (78 days) (P < .0001). In addition, the PEG-B was found to be as safe as the PEG-T for small infants who weighed less than 5 kg. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-B placement should be considered as the procedure of choice over PEG-T placement for children. It offers similar safety profiles, even for small patients and a significantly longer interval until first device change.     

The role of endoscopically placed feeding or decompression tubes

The minimally invasive nature of endoscopically placed gastrostomy tubes makes them a viable consideration in palliative care. Complications related to the procedure appear to correlate with age and underlying comorbidities.However, in many instances, the scientific basis for establishing benefit or harm from tube placement is methodologically inadequate. Decisions must be preceded by a discussion of the value and potential risk of artificial nutrition in a particular setting, respecting the wishes and beliefs of each patient and his or her family. The decision to use PEG placement for any reason should be consistent with legal and ethical principles, reflect patient autonomy over any other consideration (including beneficence), and arise from a clear determination of the goals of care (and whether the PEG placement will truly help meet those goals). Whenever possible, further studies with better design are needed to evaluate whether the use of PEG truly affects quality of life and patient outcome in palliative care. PEG tubes for decompression are placed successfully most of the time. Symptom relief occurs usually within 7 days of the procedure. Overall, the morbidity related to the PEG procedure for decompression is only slightly higher than when the same technique is used for nutritional purposes. The appropriate timing for PEG tube placement for nutritional support and for decompression throughout the course of disease progression may be difficult to determine and yet may be a factor in its overall efficiency. Only minor modifications of the basic technique used for PEG placement for nutritional purposes are required to adapt the technique to a variety of other applications in palliative care.     

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy with Jejunal Extension: A New Technique

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG) with jejunal extensions are placed in patients at risk for aspiration of gastric contents. Current methods used are difficult and often ineffective in preventing aspiration, and frequently result in substantial morbidity and mortality. In this study, a new method of jejunal extension from a PEG was evaluated with regard to efficacy and prevention of aspiration of gastric contents while providing adequate enteral nutrition. Twelve patients with recent aspiration pneumonitis underwent PEG placement with a jejunal extension by this new method. The technique was accomplished rapidly and without difficulty in an average time of 26.2 min (range 17-31 min). In all instances, the jejunal extension remained functional for the first 8 wk after placement, and there were no instances of aspiration of gastric contents while nutritional requirements were met. None of the patients died from complications of the procedure. The method described was effective in preventing aspiration of gastric contents, was easily performed, and was associated with minimal complications.     

胃镜辅助放置鼻胃管和空肠营养管

目的:探讨胃镜下放置鼻胃管和空肠营养管建立肠内营养途径的方法.方法:11例鼻胃管,其中8例患者在胃镜下用异物钳钳夹鼻胃管推送胃镜将其送至胃腔,3例在胃镜下放入导丝,通过导丝放入鼻胃管.46例空肠营养管,在胃镜下用异物钳钳夹胃腔内空肠营养管,推送胃镜将其送至Treitz韧带以下.结果:胃镜下11例鼻胃管全部放置成功.通过改良胃镜直接置管方法,空肠营养管放置成功率例为100%,其中鼻肠管29例,三腔鼻肠管17例.鼻肠管弯曲,折回,打圈7例,后退鼻肠管头端重新放置成功,退出胃镜后鼻肠管脱出3例,改进方法后,2例2次,1例3次放置成功.1例胰腺炎置管后血淀粉酶增高.结论:对常规放置困难的鼻胃管,胃镜下放置简单可行.改良方法后可一次使空肠营养管头端到达空肠,此方法副作用小,成功率高,操作技术简单安全.