A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: A comparison with posteroanterior spine,hip and total-body DXA

We report a study to assess whether supine lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the lumbar spine provide better data for monitoring response to treatment than alternative measurement sites such as the posteroanterior (PA) spine, hip and total body. The study population was 152 women enrolled in a placebo-controlled clinical trial of cyclical etidronate therapy. All subjects were 1–10 years after the menopause with bone mineral density (BMD) between 0 and –2 SD of age-matched normal women. Paired PA and lateral spine, left hip and total-body DXA scans were performed at baseline, 1 year and 2 years on a Hologic QDR-2000. One hundred and thirty-one subjects completed the study. Mean percentage change from baseline at 2 years in the treated (n=61) and control (n=70) groups was calculated for vertebral body, width-adjusted (WA) vertebral body, mid-vertebral body and WA mid-vertebral body BMD measurements on the lateral scans and compared with the percentage changes in PA spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle and total-body BMD. The long-term precision for each BMD measurement site was obtained by linear regression analysis in subjects taking placebo. Overall treatment effect, defined as the difference in the percentage change in BMD in the two treatment groups at 2 years, was divided by long-term precision to give an index of the ability of each site to monitor response to treatment. Results (and standard errors) normalized to the ratio of treatment effect/precision for PA spine BMD were as follows: PA spine, 1.00; vertebral body, 0.89 (0.14); WA vertebral body, 0.78 (0.14); mid-vertebral body, 0.65 (0.14); WA mid-vertebral body, 0.60 (0.13); femoral neck, 0.35 (0.15); trochanter, 0.45 (0.15); Ward's triangle, 0.59 (0.22); total body, 0.52 (0.19). Although treatment effect was larger for lateral than for PA spine BMD, this advantage was offset by the greater precision errors. PA spine BMD remains the optimum measurement for longitudinal studies in recently postmenopausal women.     

Bone density interpretation and relevance in Caucasian children aged 9-17 years of age: insights from a population-based fracture study.

The interpretation of bone density measurement in children is difficult due to a number of factors including rapid change in body size and uncertain clinical significance of bone density in children. This study asked two questions. (1) Is there a preferred bone density measurement site or type for fracture risk in children? (2) What is the best way to interpret bone density in children? This population-based case control study included 321 upper limb fracture cases and 321 class- and sex- matched randomly selected controls. Bone density at the hip, spine, and total body (including the arm) was measured by a Hologic QDR2000 densitometer (Waltham, MA) and examined as bone area (BA), bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), and BMC/lean mass (BMCLM). The only dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) variables that were consistently associated with fracture risk in both boys and girls were spine BMD and BMAD for total upper limb fractures, and spine and hip BMAD for wrist and forearm fractures. No significant associations were observed for BA and BMCLM and inconsistent associations for BMC and other BMD sites. Five-yr fracture risk varied from 15–24% depending on site and gender in a child with a Z-score of -3. In the controls, all DXA variables were associated with age, height, and weight, but the weakest associations were with BMAD. In conclusion, in this study the spine BMAD had the strongest and most consistent association with upper limb fracture risk in children. The associations with age and body size imply that age specific Z-scores will be the most convenient for interpretation of DXA measures in children. Five-yr wrist and forearm fracture risk has potential as a clinical endpoint of immediate relevance.     

Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume

Biomechanical studies of the thoracic spine often scan cadaveric segments by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to obtain measures of bone mass. Only one study has reported the accuracy of lateral scans of thoracic vertebral bodies. The accuracy of DXA scans of thoracic spine segments and of anterior-posterior (AP) thoracic scans has not been investigated. We have examined the accuracy of AP and lateral thoracic DXA scans by comparison with ash weight, the gold-standard for measuring bone mineral content (BMC). We have also compared three methods of estimating volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) with a novel standard–ash weight (g)/bone volume (cm³) as measured by computed tomography (CT). Twelve T5–T8 spine segments were scanned with DXA (AP and lateral) and CT. The T6 vertebrae were excised, the posterior elements removed and then the vertebral bodies were ashed in a muffle furnace. We proposed a new method of estimating vBMD and compared it with two previously published methods. BMC values from lateral DXA scans displayed the strongest correlation with ash weight (r=0.99) and were on average 12.8% higher (p<0.001). As expected, BMC (AP or lateral) was more strongly correlated with ash weight than areal bone mineral density (aBMD; AP: r=0.54, or lateral: r=0.71) or estimated vBMD. Estimates of vBMD with either of the three methods were strongly and similarly correlated with volumetric BMD calculated by dividing ash weight by CT-derived volume. These data suggest that readily available DXA scanning is an appropriate surrogate measure for thoracic spine bone mineral and that the lateral scan might be the scan method of choice.     

The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual X-ray absorptiometry

New developments in dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allow the performance of high precision anteroposterior (AP) and lateral scans of spinal bone mineral density (BMD, units: g/cm²) without the patient moving from the supine position. Data from both projections may be combined to give an estimate of the true volumetric bone mineral density (VBMD, units: g/cm³) of the lumbar vertebral bodies. This report presents a cadaver study designed to validate DXA measurements of volumetric bone density. Sections of whole lumbar spine were scanned in AP and lateral projections in a water tank to simulate soft tissue. Individual vertebrae were then divided to separate the vertebral body from the neural arch, and vertebral body volume was measured using the displacement of sand. The bone mineral content (BMC) of vertebral bodies and neural arches was measured by ashing at 250°C for 60 hours followed by 500°C for a further 24 hours. The results showed that DXA scanning systematically underestimated ashing data by 14% for AP BMC, 33% for vertebral body BMC, 23% for vertebral body volume, and 12% for VBMD. Despite these significant systematic errors, the DXA measurements and ashing values were highly correlated (r=0.979-0.992). The results suggested that after allowing for the systematic errors, lateral DXA parameters related closely to true BMC, volume, and VBMD.     

Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women

The aim of this study was to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy people and examine the influence of age, anthropometry, and postmenopause on calculated bone mineral apparent density (BMAD). The study included 541 healthy subjects (249 men and 292 women), aged 20 to 79 years. Anthropometric measurements included height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Bone mineral content (BMC) and areal BMD were measured at the lumbar spine and proximal femur, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The calculation of volumetric density relied on the formula BMAD=BMD/BA (where BA = bone area). Association between densitometric parameters and age, height, weight, and postmenopause was analyzed with multiple regression. BMC and BMD decreased with age, especially in postmenopausal women. The average annual bone loss in spine was 0.2% in both sexes, whereas femur loss was 0.5% in men and 0.3% in women. Bone area slightly increased with age in both sexes, and BMD loss after the age of 50 could be attributed to bone area increase. To minimize the effect of bone size on bone density, volumetric density and areal density were regressed to age, anthropometry, and postmenopause. Age and postmenopause were significantly associated with BMD and BMAD in the spine and femur. Furthermore, BMD showed a stronger association with height and weight than BMAD, in both regions. Weaker association of body height and weight with BMAD than with BMD suggests that BMD depends on the bone size and body size and that the different BMDs could be the consequence of the difference in those parameters.     

Bone mineral density by age, gender, pubertal stages, and socioeconomic status in healthy Lebanese children and adolescents

Gender, ethnicity, and lifestyle factors affect bone mass acquisition during childhood, thus the need for age- and sex-adjusted Z scores using ethnic-specific data for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. This study aimed at establishing normative data for BMD in healthy Lebanese children and adolescents. Three hundred sixty-three healthy children aged 10 to 17 years (mean+/-SD: 13.1+/-2.0) were studied. BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), and lean mass were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a Hologic 4500A device, and apparent volumetric BMD (BMAD) of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck were calculated. BMD, BMC, and BMAD were expressed by age groups and Tanner stages for boys and girls separately. There was a significant effect of age and puberty on all bone parameters, except at the femoral neck BMAD in boys. BMC and BMD were higher at cortical sites in boys, including subtotal body and hip; whereas, in girls, it was higher at a site more enriched in trabecular bone, namely the lumbar spine. At several skeletal sites, girls had significantly higher BMD adjusted for lean mass than boys. By the end of puberty, adolescents had a mean BMD that was 43-66% higher at the lumbar spine and 25-41% higher at cortical sites than pre-pubertal children, depending on the gender. Mean BMD values in the study group were significantly lower (P<0.01) than Western normative values, with Z scores ranging between -0.2 and -1.1. In both genders, children of lower socioeconomic status tended to have lower BMD than those from a higher socioeconomic background. This study allows additional insight into gender dimorphism in mineral accretion during puberty. It also provides a valuable reference database for the assessment of BMD in children with pubertal or growth disorders who are of Middle Eastern origin.     

How Often Does Lateral Spine DXA Detect Low Bone Mass in Patients with Both Normal PA Spine and Hip?

The clinical utility of lateral bone mineral density (BMD) measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis remains controversial. Since both posterior-anterior (PA) spine and hip scans are universally performed, the true clinical utility of lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) should lie in its ability to detect low bone mass independent of both PA spine and hip. We examined lateral, PA and hip BMDs in 2134 referred Caucasian females aged 25-89 using the Hologic 2000. Compared only to PA scans, the additional percentages of women with very low BMD (T-score below -2.5 utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] III normative database) on lateral were 7.3, 16.4, 28.2, 33.7, and 26.2% for age groups 25-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89, respectively. When the results from both PA and total hip measurements were combined, lower but still significant percentages were found: 5.4, 14.9, 24.4, 26.6, and 17.8% for age groups 25-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89, respectively. Utilizing the original Hologic normative database, the additional yield in women with a nonosteoporotic PA spine and femoral neck was quite low: 4.6, 8.5, 13.3, 10.0, and 2.5% for women age 25-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89, respectively. Thus, the lateral scans now add more additional patients into the very low BMD category. Whether the relationship to future fracture risk of low BMD and T-scores on lateral is similar to that of PA spine remains to be established.     

Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts

Lumbar spine geometry, density and indices of bone strength were assessed relative to menarche status, using artistic gymnastics exposure during growth as a model of mechanical loading. Paired posteroanterior (pa) and supine lateral (lat) DXA scans of L3 for 114 females (60 ex/gymnasts and 54 non-gymnasts) yielded output for comparison of paired (palat) versus standard pa and lat outcomes. BMC, areal BMD, vertebral body dimensions, bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), axial compressive strength (IBS) and a fracture risk index were evaluated, modeling vertebral body geometry as an ellipsoid cylinder. Two-factor ANCOVA tested statistical effects of gymnastic exposure, menarche status and their interaction, adjusting for age and height as appropriate. Compared to non-gymnasts, ex/gymnasts exhibited greater paBMD, paBMC, paWidth, pa Cross-sectional area (CSA), paVolume, latBMD, latBMAD, palatCSA and palatIBS (p<0.05). Non-gymnasts exhibited greater latDepth/paWidth, latBMC/paBMC, latVHeight, latArea and Fracture Risk Index. Using ellipsoid vertebral geometric models, no significant differences were detected for pa or palat BMAD. In contrast, cuboid model results (Carter et al., 1992) suggested erroneous ex/gymnast paBMAD advantages, resulting from invalid assumptions of proportional variation in linear skeletal dimensions. Gymnastic exposure was associated with shorter, wider vertebral bodies, yielding greater axial compressive strength and lower fracture risk, despite no BMAD advantage. Our results suggest the importance of plane-specific vertebral geometric adaptation to mechanical loading during growth. Paired scan output provides a more accurate assessment of this adaptation than pa or lat plane scans alone.     

Measurement of spinal bone mineral density on a Hologic Discovery DXA scanner with and without leg elevation.

Although it is generally recommended that patients keep their hips flexed by 90 degrees during the measurement of spinal bone mineral density (BMD), there is no uniform agreement among the manufacturers of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners regarding the positioning of legs while scanning the spine. We measured spinal BMD in 54 postmenopausal women, from L1 to L4 in posterior-anterior projection, using a Hologic Discovery scanner, first with their legs elevated as recommended by the manufacturer and then with their legs flat on the scanning table. Differences of bone mineral content (BMC), area of the region of interest (ROI), BMD, and T-score of the total spine between the 2 scans were compared. The mean (SD) age of the women was 54.3 yr (15 yr). Between the 2 scans, BMC, area of the ROI, BMD, and T-scores showed high correlations (r=0.98, 0.94, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively). BMC and the area of the ROI changed significantly between the 2 scans, but the changes of BMD and T-scores were not significant. The percentage changes of BMC and the area of the ROI were similar (2.6% and 2.4%, respectively), whereas T-scores showed no change and change of BMD was only 0.6%. The absolute difference in BMD between the 2 scans was only 0.005 (p=0.09). When spinal BMD was measured with their legs elevated, 31 women were found to have osteoporosis and further 13 were found to have osteopenia. When spinal BMD was measured with their legs flat, 32 women were found to have osteoporosis and further 12 were found to have osteopenia. In conclusion, no clinically or statistically significant difference in the total spinal BMD was found when the BMD in a group of women was measured on a Hologic Discovery DXA scanner with their legs positioned flat.     

Bone mineral density in prepubertal obese and control children: relation to body weight,lean mass,and fat mass

The aim of the study was to determine the influence of obesity on bone status in prepubertal children. This study included 20 obese prepubertal children (10.7 +/- 1.2 years old) and 23 maturation-matched controls (10.9 +/- 1.1 years old). Bone mineral area, bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and calculation of bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) at the whole body and lumbar spine (L1-L4) and body composition (lean mass and fat mass) were assessed by DXA. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus were measured with a BUA imaging device. Expressed as crude values, DXA measurements of BMD at all bone sites and BUA (69.30 versus 59.63 dB/MHz, P < 0.01) were higher in obese children. After adjustment for body weight and lean mass, obese children displayed lower values of whole-body BMD (0.88 versus 0.96 g/cm2, P < 0.05) and BMC (1190.98 versus 1510.24 g, P < 0.01) in comparison to controls. When results were adjusted for fat mass, there was no statistical difference between obese and control children for DXA and ultrasound results. Moreover, whole-body BMAD was lower (0.086 versus 0.099 g/cm3, P < 0.0001), whereas lumbar spine BMAD was greater (0.117 versus 0.100 g/cm3, P < 0.001) in obese children. Thus, it was observed that, in obese children, cortical and trabecular bone displayed different adaptation patterns to their higher body weight. Cortical bone seems to enhance both size and BMC and trabecular bone to enhance BMC. Finally, considering total body weight and lean mass of obese children, these skeletal responses were not sufficient to compensate for the excess load on the whole body.     

Interpretation of calcaneus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the assessment of osteopenia and fracture risk.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus is useful in assessing bone mass and fracture risk at other skeletal sites. However, DXA yields an areal bone mineral density (BMD) that depends on both bone apparent density and bone size, potentially complicating interpretation of the DXA results. Information that is more complete may be obtained from DXA exams by using a volumetric density in addition to BMD in clinical applications. In this paper, we develop a simple methodology for determining a volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) of the calcaneus. For the whole calcaneus, BMAD = (BMC)/ADXA3/2, where BMC and ADXA are, respectively, the bone mineral content and projected area measured by DXA. We found that ADXA3/2 was proportional to the calcaneus volume with a proportionality constant of 1.82 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- SE). Consequently, consistent with theoretical predictions, BMAD was proportional to the true volumetric apparent density (rho) of the bone according to the relationship rho = 1.82 BMAD. Also consistent with theoretical predictions, we found that BMD varied in proportion to rho V1/3, where V is the bone volume. We propose that the volumetric apparent density, estimated at the calcaneus, provides additional information that may aid in the diagnosis of osteopenia. Areal BMD or BMD2 may allow estimation of the load required to fracture a bone. Fracture risk depends on the loading applied to a bone in relation to the bone's failure load. When DXA is used to assess osteopenia and fracture risk in patients, it may be useful to recognize the separate and combined effects of applied loading, bone apparent density, and bone size.     

New or worsening lumbar spine vertebral fractures increase lumbar spine bone mineral density and falsely suggest improved skeletal status.

Changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) are determined by follow-up dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessments. Inclusion of new or worsening vertebral fractures in follow-up measurements may increase BMD. To test this hypothesis, we examined pooled data from the placebo groups of two clinical trials that involved postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DXA measurements of lumbar spine BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), and area were obtained at baseline and at two years in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Trial and at baseline and study endpoint in the Fracture Prevention Trial. In these trials, fractured vertebrae identified by expert radiologists during posterioranterior (PA) spine DXA assessment were excluded from the BMD assessment. Lateral spine radiographs were graded using a semi-quantitative (SQ) scale. Most new or worsening vertebral fractures (84%) diagnosed from lateral spine radiographs were not identified by PA spine DXA. While the follow-up BMD of vertebrae without new or worsening fractures did not change significantly, each unit increase in SQ grade was associated with an approximate 7.0% increase in the BMD of affected vertebrae (p < 0.001). Increases in BMD were highly correlated with increases in BMC (r = 0.87, p < 0.001). Inclusion of new or worsening vertebral fractures increased PA spine BMD measurements at follow-up, with the impact being related to the magnitude of change in SQ score. It is difficult to reliably identify vertebral fractures from PA spine DXA assessments. Inclusion of new or worsening vertebral fractures in follow-up DXA measurements may falsely suggest an improvement in spine BMD. Our suggestion is to perform lateral spine imaging concurrently with any assessment of PA spine BMD in patients who, in the opinion of the health care provider, may have vertebral fractures.     

Femur neck bone mineral density and fracture risk by age,sex, and race or Hispanic origin in older US adults from NHANES III

Summary

We provide the first reference values for bone mineral content and bone mineral density according to age and sex in Iranian children and adolescents. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was high, and levels of physical activity were low in our sample. Multiple regression analyses showed age, BMI, and Tanner stage to be the main indicators of bone mineral apparent density.

Purpose

Normal bone structure is formed in childhood and adolescence. The potential determinants which interact with genetic factors to influence bone density include gender, nutritional, lifestyle, and hormonal factors. This study aimed to evaluate bone mineral content (BMC) and the bone mineral density (BMD) and factors that may interfere with it in Iranian children.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 476 healthy Iranian children and adolescents (235 girls and 241 boys) aged 9–18 years old participated. BMC and BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using a Hologic Discovery device, and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck were calculated.

Results

We present percentile curves by age derived separately for BMC, BMD, and BMAD of the lumbar spine, left femoral neck, and total body excluding the head for boys and girls. Maximum accretion of BMC and BMD was observed at ages of 11–13 years (girls) and 12–15 years (boys).The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was high and physical activity was low in our participants. However, in multiple regression analyses, age, BMI, and Tanner stage were the main indicators of BMD and BMAD

Conclusion

These normative data aid in the evaluation of bone density in Iranian children and adolescents. Further research to evaluate the evolution of BMD in Iranian children and adolescents is needed to identify the reasons for significant differences in bone density values between Iranian populations and their Western counterparts.     

Bone mineral density and prevalent vertebral fractures in men and women

To test the hypothesis that the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and estimated volumetric BMD and prevalent vertebral fractures differs in men and women, we studied 317 Caucasian men and 2,067 Caucasian women (average age 73 years). A total of 43 (14%) men and 386 (19%) women had a vertebral fracture identified on lateral spine radiographs using vertebral morphometry. Hip and spine areal BMD was about 1/3 standard deviation lower among men and women with a vertebral fracture. A 0.10 g/cm² decrease in areal BMD was associated with 30–40% increased odds of having a fracture in men and 60–70% increased likelihood in women. Low bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) was also associated with 40–50% increased odds of a vertebral fracture in both genders. The probability of a man having a fracture was observed at higher absolute areal BMD values than observed for women (P=values for interaction of BMD × gender: trochanter, P=0.05; femoral neck, P=0.10; total hip, P=0.09). In contrast, the probability of fracture was similar in men and women across the range of estimated volumetric BMD (BMAD). In conclusion, low BMD and low BMAD are associated with increased odds of vertebral fracture in both men and women. Measures of bone mass that partially correct for gender differences in bone size may yield universal estimates of fracture risk. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation.     

Adaptation of the Carter method to adjust lumbar spine bone mineral content for age and body size: application to children who were born preterm.

In adults, the Carter method allows the separation of the lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC) into its constituents; bone volume (BV) and volumetric density (bone mineral apparent density [BMAD]). However, this method is not widely used in pediatric studies and does not account for the effects of body habitus on bone mass. The aims of this study were to modify the Carter method for use in children by developing an approach that adjusts separately for age and body height, and to test whether lumbar spine bone mass is normal in children born who were born preterm. Twenty-five preterm-born children were matched to a term-born child. Lumbar spine bone mass was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The BV and BMAD were calculated. Z-scores based on age and height were calculated. The preterm group had reduced absolute height, weight, BMC, BV, and BMAD, and reduced height, weight, and BMC for their age. The BMC was appropriate for height. The BV was appropriate for age. The BMAD was reduced for age but appropriate for height. In preterm children, the major abnormality at the lumbar spine is a decrease in volumetric density; however, this decrease is proportional with their reduced stature, and we speculate that there is no reduction in the strength of the lumbar spine.     

Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT

Significant relationships exist between areal bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone strength. However, the predictive validity of BMD for osteoporotic vertebral fractures remains suboptimal. The diagnostic sensitivity of DXA in the lumbar spine may be improved by assessing BMD from lateral-projection scans, as these might better approximate the objective of measuring the trabecular-rich bone in the vertebral body, compared to the commonly-used posterior-anterior (PA) projections. Nowadays, X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) allows non-destructive three-dimensional structural characterization of entire bone segments at high resolution. In this study, human lumbar cadaver spines were examined ex situ by DXA in lateral and PA projections, as well as by μCT, with the aims (1) to investigate the ability of bone quantity measurements obtained by DXA in the lateral projection and in the PA projection, to predict variations in bone quantity measurements obtained by μCT, and (2) to assess their respective capabilities to predict whole vertebral body strength, determined experimentally. Human cadaver spines were scanned by DXA in PA projections and lateral projections. Bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD for L2 and L3 vertebrae were determined. The L2 and L3 vertebrae were then dissected and entirely scanned by μCT. Total bone volume (BV(tot)=cortical+trabecular), trabecular bone volume (BV), and trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were calculated over the entire vertebrae. The vertebral bodies were then mechanically tested to failure in compression, to determine ultimate load. The variables BV(tot), BV, and BV/TV measured by μCT were better predicted by BMC and BMD measured by lateral-projection DXA, with higher R(2) values and smaller standard errors of the estimate (R(2)=0.65-0.90, SEE=11%-18%), compared to PA-projection DXA (R(2)=0.33-0.53, SEE=22%-34%). The best predictors of ultimate load were BV(tot) and BV assessed by μCT (R(2)=0.88 and R(2)=0.81, respectively), and BMC and BMD from lateral-projection DXA (R(2)=0.82 and R(2)=0.70, respectively). Conversely, BMC and BMD from PA-projection DXA were lower predictors of ultimate load (R(2)=0.49 and R(2)=0.37, respectively). This ex vivo study highlights greater capabilities of lateral-projection DXA to predict variations in vertebral body bone quantity as measured by μCT, and to predict vertebral strength as assessed experimentally, compared to PA-projection DXA. This provides basis for further exploring the clinical application of lateral-projection DXA analysis.     

Bone mass and density in preadolescent boys with and without Down syndrome

Summary

Preadolescent boys with Down syndrome at 7–10 years of age have lower bone mass and density in the pelvis than age-matched children without Down syndrome. However, bone mass and density of total body less head and lumbar spine are not different between these two groups.

Introduction

This study aimed to assess bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) in preadolescent boys with and without Down syndrome (DS) at 7–10 years of age.

Methods

Eleven preadolescent boys with DS and eleven age-matched children without DS participated in this study. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMC and BMD in whole body and lumbar spine. Both BMC and BMD of total body less head (TBLH) and lumbar spine (vertebrae L2–L4) were compared between the two groups, with and without adjusting for physical characteristics such as bone area, body height, and total lean mass. Two bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) variables were calculated to estimate volumetric BMD in the lumbar spine.

Results

Both BMC and BMD in the pelvis were lower in the DS group, after adjusting for physical characteristics. However, with and without adjusting for physical characteristics, the two groups were not different in BMC and BMD of the arms, legs, and TBLH from the whole body scan and in BMC, BMD, and BMAD of the lumbar spine from the lumbar spine scan.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that the pelvis may be the first site to show the significant difference in BMC and BMD between preadolescent boys with and without DS. It also suggests that significantly lower BMC and BMD in whole body and lumbar spine, which is usually observed in young adults with DS, may not occur before adolescence.     

Effect of bone area on spine density in Chinese men and women in Taiwan

Areal bone mineral density (BMD), the quotient of bone mineral content (BMC) divided by the projectional bone area (BA), measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA), is the most common parameter used today to evaluate spinal osteoporosis. To evaluate whether gender, age, weight, and height can determine spinal BA, and to compare BA and analyze its effects on spinal density in the two genders, we measured BA and BMC, and calculated areal BMD, and the bone mineral apparent density (BMAD = BMD/√BA) of the L-2 to L-4 vertebrate of 604 female and 223 male Chinese volunteers from 20 to 70 years of age using a Norland XR-26 DXA. Standardized for height and weight, BA showed a relatively large variation and a significant increase with increasing age in both genders. On the other hand, BMC stayed unchanged in men > 50 years of age and decreased with aging in postmenopausal women. Younger men (< 51 years) had a much larger mean BA (by 15.5%) and larger mean BMC (only 10%) than that of age-matched women. As a result, younger men had a slightly and significantly lower areal BMD (by 7.1%) and a much lower BMAD (by 16%) (p < 0.0001 for both) than premenopausal women of similar age. Men had higher areal BMD and BMAD values than age-matched women only after age 50 years. Although taller body height, heavier weight, and increasing age were associated with a larger BA, these factors could not explain most of the interindividual variations in BA in both genders. Thus anteroposterior BA of lumbar vertebrate measured with DXA seems to affect the areal BMD and BMAD readings in the two genders. The larger BA caused a low BMAD and probably underestimated the true volumetric spine density in men.     

Bone mineral density of proximal femur and spine in Korean children between 2 and 18 years of age

Ethnic factors affect bone mass acquisition during childhood. The aim of our study was to establish normative data for bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy Korean children and adolescents, using 446 lumbar spine scans (224 males and 222 females) and 364 proximal femur scans (181 males and 183 females) of healthy children between ages 2 and 18 years measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using Hologic QDR Discovery A 2004. There was an increase in both BMC and BMD during early childhood, acceleration during the adolescence spurt, and a slower increase later. Until 11 years of age, both male and female BMC and BMD were not statistically different. There was a rapid increase in both BMC and BMD in females earlier than in males, and later males caught up with the females and overshot the female values. When compared with Canadian children, BMD and BMC of total proximal femur was found to be more and BMD and BMC of total lumbar spine to be less at some ages. Tanner's stage was significantly associated with BMD and BMC of spine and proximal femur in males and BMC of spine in females in the first three Tanner's stages. Height, body weight, fat content, and body mass index influenced BMC and BMD at different sites by variable amount. Hence, the values presented in this study should be used as reference values in Korean children and adolescents.     

Whole body bone mass and body composition in a girl with achondroplasia, at ages 9 through 12.

A 9-yr-old white female with achondroplasia was one of a group of 773 children who were recruited for a study of the accumulation of whole body skeletal mass during four annual measurements. Measurements of bone, fat, and lean mass were obtained with a Hologic 1000W instrument. The following variables are used to compare the subject with the 130 healthy white girls who participated in the study: bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD). Ratios of BMC to weight or BMC to height, and BMD to weight or height, were also calculated. We found that the BMC of the subject was lower when compared to the reference group, but the ratios of BMC to weight or BMC to height were similar in both. BMD was also lower in the patient, but, when expressed in relation to height and weight, the ratios were similar or slightly higher in the case. BMAD was higher in the subject with achondroplasia at all ages. The subject had a lower percentage fat and higher percentage lean mass than the reference children. We conclude that the accumulation of bone mass in this subject with achondroplasia is appropriate for her reduced body size.