Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Long-Term Therapy of Antitachycardia Pacing for Supraventricular Tachycardia

Long-term antitachycardia pacing therapy with the InterTach 262-12 and 262-16 was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients (mean age 50 +/- 13 years) with recurrent, drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 20 patients, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in ten patients, and a reentrant tachycardia due to Mahaim fibers in one patient. During follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months, 250 persistent tachycardia episodes occurred in 22 patients. By adjusting detection and termination mode, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia could be controlled in 19 of 32 patients (60%) by antitachycardia pacing alone. Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy was required in ten of 32 patients (30%). During follow-up antitachycardia pacing became ineffective in three patients (10%). Thus, chronic antitachycardia pacing proved to be safe and effective in selected patients with drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia and could significantly improve quality of life by rapid termination of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia episodes.     

''Long-Term Results of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia

Between 1979 and 1984 the Cybertach-60, (Intermedics, Inc. Model 262-01), a programmable, automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients who had drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The patients have been followed for a total of 64-108 (mean 84 months). All patients were symptomatic and had failed two or more drugs and six patients had required prior DC cardioversion. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia was atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry in six patients, AV reentry in four patients, and atrial tachycardia in one patient. Preoperatively all patients had reliable termination of the tachycardia without induction of atrial fibrillation by pacing methods available to Cybertach-60. Postimplant, Cybertach-60 reliably terminated all episodes of tachycardia without ancillary drug therapy. Nevertheless, at long-term follow-up antitachycardia pacing was effective and safe in the minority (36%), with only four patients out of eleven still using a pacemaker for supraventricular tachycardia. One of these four patients required additional drug therapy. In one of the patients, the Cybertach-60 was replaced after 78 months by a more advanced device, (Intertach, Intermedics, Inc.) because of a depleted Cybertach-60 battery. In seven patients who no longer use antitachycardia pacing for termination of tachycardia, one patient developed atrial fibrillation during tachycardia termination (at 58 months postimplant). Three patients experienced induction of tachycardia or atrial fibrillation by the pacemaker due to undersensing of sinus P waves (at 36, 48, and 51 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical Experience with a New Software-Based Antitachycardia Pacemaker for Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.     

Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implanted Pacing Cardioverter Defibrillators

Eighty-six patients were treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) because of sustained ventricalar tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). In 27 patients an epicardial system was used, in 59 patients a transvenous system with a subcutaneous patch electrode was implanted. During a mean follow-up time of 17 ± 9 months, inappropriate activations of the ICD due to supraventricular tachycardia were documented by Holter monitoring in 14 patients (16%). In 8 patients paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in 2 patients chronic AF, in 1 patient atrial flutter, and in 3 patients sinus tachycardia triggered antitachycardia pacing functions (12 patients) or internal defibrillation (2 patients). In 3 patients (5%) VT was induced by inappropriate antitachycardia pacing. In an additional 18 patients (21%) inappropriate activation of antitachycardia functions due to atrial tachyarrhythmias were suspected based on telemetry readouts or the patient's history. Inappropriate activation of ICD therapy triggered by intermittent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias is common. Further improvements of detection algorithms for supraventricular tachycardia are required in future device generations.     

Programmable External Automatic Antitachycardia Pacing as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

The efficacy and safety of external programmable automatic antitachycardia pacemakers (ATPs) used in the critical care setting for recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was evaluated. Ten patients who had failed a mean of 4.0 +/- 1.4 antiarrhythmic medications (range 2-7) and who had previously required electrical cardioversion for VT were enrolled. Prior to ATP use, successful overdrive pacing termination of VT was demonstrated in all patients. Intertach (Intermedics, Inc.; n = 9) and Orthocor II (Cordis, Inc.; n = 1) ATPs were attached to temporary bipolar transvenous or epicardial pacing leads. Mean patient age was 66.4 +/- 11.5 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 22 +/- 7.5%. At the time of initial ATP use, mean VT cycle length was 347 +/- 88 msec (range 280-550 msec). A burst scanning antitachycardia pacing algorithm was used in each patient; one patient was also treated with a fixed rate burst adapted to VT cycle length. The duration of ATP use ranged from 2-25 days (median 5), successfully terminating greater than 3,369 VT episodes (median 3, range 0 to greater than 3,103 episodes per-patient). Two episodes of ATP induced rate acceleration occurred, each successfully terminated by the ATP. Only two patients required external cardioversion during ATP use, one for primary ventricular fibrillation and one for rapid polymorphic VT associated with antiarrhythmic drug withdrawal. ATPs also provided antibradycardia pacing and allowed for serial programmed ventricular stimulation. No complications were associated with transvenous catheter or ATP use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated with Automatic Scanning Antitachycardia Pacemaker

The long-term efficacy of an automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was evaluated in 13 patients with supraventricular tachycardia and in two patients with ventricular tachycardia. Patients were followed for 4–53 months (median 16). The concertina scanning mode with 2–7 extrastimuli proved to be effective in all patients but one. During follow-up, two patients had to be reoperated due to sensing problems. Atrial flutter was induced during scanning in one patient, termination mode was triggered by sinus tachycardia in one patient despite beta blocker therapy, and in one patient after cessation of beta blocker treatment. The pacemaker did not induce any serious arrhythmias and no sudden deaths occurred. Seven patients were given beta blockers, one patient with ventricular tachycardia was additionally administered amiodarone. In conclusion, the PASAR 4171 (Telectronics, Englewood, CO, USA) automatic scanning pacemaker is an alternative or adjunctive means to chronic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with supraventricular tachycardia, but further versatility with regard to sensitivity, refractory period, and tachycardia recognition is required to eliminate the shortcomings observed, including the need for additional beta blocker therapy.     

Implantable Pacers for Tachycardia Termination: Stimulation Techniques and Long-Term Efficacy

The long-term efficacy of pacing for termination o/supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was reviewed. Increasingly complex and sophisticated antitachycardia pacing stimulation patterns have evolved, and are outlined. Although excellent results are reported with simple patterns, it may be that the more complex algorithms increase the percentage o/tachycardia patients who may be candidates for implantation of a device. In the papers reviewed, there were 460 patients, 268 with SVT, and 192 with VT. Results were judged to be good-excellent in 96.5% of both VT and SVT groups.     

High incidence of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies in children and adolescents with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Appropriate and inappropriate therapies of implantable cardioverter defibrillators have a major impact on morbidity and quality of life in ICD recipients, but have not been systematically studied in children and young adults during long-term follow-up. ICD implantation was performed in 20 patients at the mean age of 16 +/- 6 years, 11 of which had prior surgical repair of a congenital heart defect, 9 patients had other cardiac diseases. Implant indications were aborted sudden cardiac death in six patients, recurrent ventricular tachycardia in 9 patient, and syncope in 5 patients. Epicardial implantation was performed in 6 and transvenous implantation in 14 patients. Incidence, reasons and predictors (age, gender, repaired congenital heart disease, history of supraventricular tachycardia, and epicardial electrode system) of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies were analyzed during a mean follow-up period of 51 +/- 31 months range 18-132 months. There were a total 239 ICD therapies in 17 patients (85%) with a therapy rate of 2.8 per patient-years of follow-up. 127 (53%) ICD therapies in 15 (75%) patients were catagorized as appropriate and 112 (47%) therapies in 10 (50%) patients as inappropriate, with a rate of 1.5 appropriate and 1.3 inappropriate ICD therapies per patient-years of follow-up. Time to first appropriate therapy was 16 +/- 18 months. Appropriate therapies were caused by ventricular fibrillation in 29 and ventricular tachycardia in 98 episodes. Termination was successful by antitachycardia pacing in 4 (3%) and by shock therapy in 123 episodes (97%). Time to first inappropriate therapy was 16 +/- 17 months. Inappropriate therapies were caused by supraventricular tachycardia in 77 (69%), T wave oversensing in 19 (17%), and electrode defect in 16 episodes (14%). It caused shocks in 87 (78%) and only antitachycardia pacing in 25 episodes (22%). No clinical variable could be identified as predictor of either appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapies. There is a high rate of ICD therapies in young ICD recipients, the majority of which occur during early follow-up. The rate of inappropriate therapies is as high as 47% and is caused by supraventricular tachycardia and electrode complications in the majority of cases. Prospective trials are required to establish preventative strategies of ICD therapies in this young patient population.     

Ventricular Pacing Induced Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Appropriately timed noncompetitive ventricular pacing potentially may initiate ventricular tachycardia in patients prone to these arrhythmias. The combination of bradycardia pacing and stored electrograms in a currently available cardioverter defibrillator provides an opportunity to evaluate the occurrence of such pacing induced ventricular tachycardia. During a surveillance period of 18.7 ± 11.4 months, stored electrograms documented 302 episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 77 patients. Five patients (6.5%) demonstrated 25 episodes (1–16 per patient) of ventricular tachycardia that were immediately preceded by an appropriately paced ventricular beat (8.3% of all episodes of ventricular tachycardia). All five patients had prior myocardial infarctions and a history of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia occurring both spontaneously and in response to programmed electrical stimulation. Antitachycardia pacing terminated pacing induced ventricular tachycardia in 22 episodes; in one episode antitachycardia pacing accelerated ventricular tachycardia. In two cases shock therapy was aborted for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. We conclude that, in selected postinfarction patients with recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, appropriately timed ventricular pacing may induce ventricular tachycardia.     

Comparison of Clinical Benefits and Outcome in Patients with Programmable and Nonprogrammable Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Technological advances in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have provided a variety of programmable parameters and antitachycardia therapies whose utility and impact on clinical outcome is presently unknown. ICDs have capabilities for cardioversion defibrillation alone (first generation ICDs), or in conjunction with demand ventricular pacing (second generation ICDs), or with demand pacing and antitachycardia pacing (third generation ICDs). We examined the pattern of antitachycardia therapy use and long-term survival in 110 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Group I included 62 patients with nonprogrammable first generation ICDs that delivered committed shock therapy after ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection based on electrogram rate and/or morphology was satisfied. Group II included 48 patients with multiprogrammable ICDs (including second and third generation ICDs) that had programmable tachyarrhythmia detection based on rate and tachycardia confirmation prior to delivery of electrical treatment with either programmable shocks and/or, as in the third generation ICDs, antitachycardia pacing. Incidence and patterns of antitachycardia therapy use and long-term survival were compared in the two groups. The incidence of appropriate shocks in patients who completed 1 year of follow-up was significantly greater in group I (30 of 43 patients = 70% vs 11 of 26 patients = 42%; P less than 0.05). In the total follow-up period, a significantly larger proportion of group I patients as compared to group II patients used the shock therapies (46 of 62 patients = 74% vs 25 of 48 patients = 52%; P less than 0.01), with the majority doing so within the first year of implantation (96% and 92%, respectively). Although the frequency of antitachycardia therapy activation was similar, the number of shocks delivered per patient was lower in group II, particularly in the initial 3 months of follow-up (P = 0.06). No clinical variable aided in identifying users from nonusers of antitachycardia therapy. Arrhythmic mortality was virtually eliminated in both groups. Two-year actuarial cardiac survival in the two groups was similar (group I = 78% vs group II = 84%; P greater than 0.2). Survival from cardiac mortality in users and nonusers of antitachycardia therapies was also similar in both groups (P greater than 0.2) and in the total patient group (P greater than 0.2). We conclude that programmable ICDs continue to confer advantages in prevention of sudden death that were observed with nonprogrammable ICDs and can be expected to improve patient tolerance and physician acceptance of device therapy for VT/VF.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Patients with Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia:

Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that patients with coronary disease, reduced left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) have improved survival with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, presumably secondary to effective termination of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, stored intracardiac electrograms were not always available and specific arrhythmias leading to ICD therapy were not always known. We examined the occurrence of ICD events in 51 consecutive patients who match the described patient profile to determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy. ICD detections were noted in 18 (35%) patients during a median follow-up period of 13.1 months. Appropriate therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 11 (22%) patients, with appropriate shocks in 8 (16%) patients and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in 4 (8%) patients. The time to first appropriate therapy occurred at a mean of 17 +/- 12 months (median 18 months, range 3-36 months). Inappropriate therapy occurred in 5 (10%) patients with inappropriate shocks in 4 patients and inappropriate ATP in 2 patients. Inappropriate therapy was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in 4 patients and for T wave oversensing in 1 patient. The reason for shock therapy was unknown in 1 patient (2%) due to ICD malfunction. The mean arrhythmia rate leading to appropriate therapy for VT/VF was 232 +/- 72 beats/min (range 181-400 beats/min), and the mean rate leading to inappropriate therapy for SVT was 168 +/- 10 beats/min (range 160-180 beats/min). Patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic NSVT commonly receive appropriate defibrillator therapy. These results support the need for ICD implantation for primary prevention, with attention to careful programming of the detection rate to prevent inappropriate therapy.     

The Impact of Antitachycardia Pacing with Defibrillation

Chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be reproducibly terminated by programmed endocardiaJ right ventricular stimulation. However, antitachycardia pacing can be associated with possible acceleration of VT, while frequent episodes of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The combined use of antitachycardia pacing and the AICD (automatic implantable cardioverier defibrillator) was evaluated in 6 out of 51 patients (age 57 ± 11 years) in whom the AICD had been implanted because of recurrent VT. In each instance VT could be terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. The interactive mode of VT termination by a pacemaker (Tachylog) as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar, ventricular inhibited (VVI) device with antitachycardia burst stimulation capability, allowing two to five stimuli at intervals of 260–300 ms and one or two interventions. During follow-up of 47 ± 24 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 50–505 times per patient. When burst stimulation accelerated VT, termination was achieved by AICD discharge. Thus, drug resistant VT can be terminated by antitachycardia pacing to avoid patient discomfort. In the event of tachycardia acceleration, VT was terminated by the AICD. A universal pacemaker-defibrillafor should combine antibradycardia and antitachycardia pacing with back-up cardioversion defibrillation.     

Holter Documented Sudden Death in a Patient with an Implanted Defibrillator

A 68-year-old man with recurrent attacks of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) received a pacer cardioverter defibrillator featuring antitachycardia pacing and cardioversion/defibrillation. Over 300 episodes of VT were successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing. During Holter monitoring the patient experienced supraventricular tachycardia with delivery of multiple antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion, and defibrillation therapies ending with the death of the patient. The following factors played a role in the unfortunate outcome of this patient: 1. triggering of VT therapy by an unexpected high sinus rate; 2. atrial fibrillation induced by cardioversion therapy; 3. a gradual and continuous increase in rate during atrial fibrillation possibly caused by repeated VT and ventricular fibrillation therapies and/or by a thrombus, found at autopsy, in a bypass graft; and 4. the limited ability of presently available defibrillators to distinguish between ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.     

Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Chagas' heart disease patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias

A total of 46 consecutive Chagas' disease patients had an automatic cardioverter defibrillator implanted at our institution from October 1998 to January 2004. A retrospective longitudinal study was carried out to identity type of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias as well as type of therapy delivered. Of these, 41 (91%) had been recovered from cardiac arrest. Five (15%) of 33 patients in whom echocardiography was done had no left ventricular function. Antiarrhythmic therapy was delivered to 37 (80%) patients during postimplant follow-up. Thirty-one of 37 (84%) patients received both shock and antitachycardia pacing, five (13%) only antitachycardia pacing, and one (3%) patient only shock. Median time to first shock was 16 days, varying from 1 to 576 days. Ventricular fibrillation was the cause of first shock in 12 patients (32%), ventricular tachycardia in 11 (29%), and ventricular tachycardia not responding to antitachycardia pacing degenerating into ventricular fibrillation in nine (24%). Five patients with ventricular tachycardia were treated with antitachycardia pacing. Probability of freedom from device discharged was 47% at 90 days, 34% at 180 days, and 9% at 360 days in the postimplant follow-up. Thus, patients with chronic Chagas' heart disease recovered from cardiac arrest have a peculiar arrhythmogenic profile characterized by a high frequency of ventricular fibrillation and no left ventricular systolic dysfunction and a short period of time for first shock.     

Ventricular Tachycardia Induced Cardiomyopathy: Improvement with Radiofrequency Ablation

Cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure due to ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia is a well-recognized phenomenon. The mechanism of such Cardiomyopathy is not clear. Ablation of the supraventricular tachycardia focus, either surgically or electrically, has been reported to result in the resolution of the left ventricular dysfunction. Similarly, the treatment of ventricular tachycardia with surgery or antitachycardia pacing has also been reported to result in improved ventricular systolic function. We present here a case of improvement in left ventricular systolic function after successful radiofrequency ablation of the ventricular tachycardia focus in the right ventricular outflow tract. We postulate that Cardiomyopathy was due to the incessant or frequent ventricular tachycardia. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case being reported.     

Combination of Antitachycardia Pacemaker and Automatic Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator for Ventricular Tachycardia

Antitachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with the possibility of fibrillating the heart; on the other hand, the frequency of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (AICD). To contribute to the further development of a universal pacemaker, we evaluated the combined use of the antitachycardia pacemaker ("tachylog") and the AICD in five patients with recurrent VT. In the automatic mode, the "tachylog" worked as a bipolar VVI pacemaker. For antitachycardia pacing, a burst of rapid ventricular pacing was delivered at about 80% of the cycle length. During a follow-up period of 5 +/- 2 months (range, 3 to 8) two to 291 successful interventions of antitachycardia pacing were counted from diagnostic data which had been collected by the pulse generator during the course of treatment. When the antitachycardia pacemaker failed to terminate VT, the AICD was activated. In the individual case, between 0 and 41 discharges of the AICD were delivered. The high pulse energy of the AICD did not damage the antitachycardia pacemaker; no interference of the two devices was observed. Future antitachycardia systems should be more flexible with regard to detection and termination modes, combining antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation.     

Long-Term Efficacy of an Antitachycardia Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Combination

Antitachycardia pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were implanted in 14 patients to control recurrent hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia (VT), All patients underwent extensive preimplant testing in the elecrrophysiology laboratory documenting that in each patient at least 50 episodes of VT could be reliably terminated by an external model of the antitachycardia pacemaker. The burst scanning mode of anfitachycardia pacing was used in all patients. ICDs were implanted solely as a back up should acceleration of VT occur, and all had high nonprogrammable rate cutoffs (mean 191 ± 12 beats/min). During a mean follow-up of 25 ± 6 months, 6,029 episodes of VT were treated in the 14 patients. Only 103 ICD discharges were required (approximately one discharge per 60 episodes of VT). Ten of the 14 patients received discharges from their ICDs. No deaths have occurred. All devices remain active and in the automatic mode. Thus, an antitachycardia pacemaker and ICD combination can safely and effectively terminate VT in highly selected patients who are subjected to extensive preimplant testing. In such patients, the vast majority of episodes of VT can be terminated with antitachycardia pacing, and only rarely is a discharge required from the ICD.     

Permanent Antitachycardia Pacemaker Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

This article describes our experience with an antitachycardia pacemaker alone (N = 3) or in combination with an automatic implontoble cardioverter defibrillator (AICD, N = 8) in the treatment of ventricular tochycardia. EJeven patients (mean ejection fraction 31%, mean oge 67 years) received an antitachycardia pacemaker. Nine had their units programmed for automatic antitachycardia pacing, one unit was programmed to automatic antitachycardia pacing by magnet activation only, and one to tachycardia detection and bradycardia support. Of the nine patients with automatic antitachycardia pacing, seven received appropriate and successful pace termination of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia at up to 120 times per month. Eight of these nine have had AICD implantations as well. There were no operative complications. Over a mean (± SD) follow-up of 12.1 ± 9.3 months (range 3–29 months), there have been two deaths, both due to heart failure. There have been four AICD discharges in three patients. Two units discharged in a clinically appropriate setting. The other two units, both with rate cutoffs <200 beats/min, were inadvertently triggered by the antitachycardia pacemaker and/or the underlying rate. In addition to the careful selection of the defibrillator rate cutoff, adverse device-device interactions were avoided by careful intraoperative lead positioning, and the disabling of bradycardia pacing when not needed or contraindicated. Antitachycardia pacing, with the safety provided by the AICD, is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory ventricular tachycardia.     

Effect of Atrial Pacing on the Frequency of Tachycardia in Patients with Recurrent Junctional Tachycardia

In order to assess whether atrial pacing reduced the frequency of tachycardia in patients with recurrent junctional tachycardias, ten patients with recurrent junctional tachycardias with atrial Intertach antitachycardia pacemakers in situ were paced in a random order in atrial demand mode at 50 ppm (AAI 50), 80 ppm (AAI 80), and 100 ppm (AAI 100) for a period of up to 1 month. The numbers of tachycardias detected by the pacemaker over this period were recorded and compared with the number seen when unpaced (000). Correct arrhythmia detection by the pacemaker was confirmed by Holter monitoring. The number of tachycardias in 000 was 44.7 +/- 19.8 (mean +/- SEM). No significant reduction in tachycardia frequency was seen in any pacing mode. Back-up atrial pacing at 50 ppm tended to reduce the frequency of tachycardias (32.3 +/- 12.8 tachycardias; P = 0.06). The higher pacing rates increased the number of tachycardias (AAI 80; 57.1 +/- 24.6 tachycardias, P = 0.20: AAI 100; 81.8 +/- 30.2 tachycardias; P = 0.31). Symptoms increased with each pacing mode and palpitations were statistically more severe in AAI 100 mode. Four patients had disabling symptoms at this rate and had to drop out. Atrial back-up pacing may be of use in some patients with junctional tachycardia, but overdrive pacing is not helpful.