Impact of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma

Bevacizumab is frequently used in patients with progressive glioblastoma raising questions regarding frequency of treatments, dosage, duration of therapy and the possibility of tapering and discontinuation for selected patient groups. We retrospectively assessed the safety and outcome of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy for reasons other than disease progression and toxicity in 19 patients with progressive glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab for at least 6 months. In 10 of the 19 patients tapering bevacizumab resulted in complete discontinuation and reinitiation after disease progression during halted treatment. As a comparison group 33 patients with bevacizumab for at least 6 months continuously dosed at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks were selected. Age and Karnofsky performance status at start of bevacizumab were similar in both groups. Influenced by the selection process, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in the group receiving a tapered and discontinued bevacizumab regimen (PFS 22.7 versus 11.2 months, HR 0.33, p-value?=?0.01; OS 29.9 versus 15.5 months, HR 0.22, p-value?=?0.001) with a median time of discontinuation of 4.5 months (range: 1.9–44.2 months). Stable disease or partial response according to RANO at ≥3 months was achieved in 89?% of patients with reinitiated bevacizumab therapy after discontinuation. These data indicate that tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy for other reasons than progression is feasible without an increased risk for tumor rebound or unresponsiveness to reinitiated bevacizumab therapy.     

A randomized phase II trial of standard dose bevacizumab versus low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine (CCNU) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

Antiangiogenic therapy can rapidly reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema but high doses of bevacizumab may induce selective pressure to promote resistance. This trial evaluated the efficacy of low dose bevacizumab in combination with lomustine (CCNU) compared to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients (N?=?71) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg) or low dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) in combination with lomustine (90 mg/m²). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on a blinded, independent radiographic assessment of post-contrast T1-weighted and non-contrast T2/FLAIR weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RANO criteria. For 69 evaluable patients, median PFS was not significantly longer in the low dose bevacizumab?+?lomustine arm (4.34 months, CI 2.96–8.34) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (4.11 months, CI 2.69–5.55, p?=?0.19). In patients with first recurrence, there was a trend towards longer median PFS time in the low dose bevacizumab?+?lomustine arm (4.96 months, CI 4.17–13.44) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (3.22 months CI 2.5–6.01, p?=?0.08). The combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine was not superior to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Although the study was not designed to exclusively evaluate patients at first recurrence, a strong trend towards improved PFS was seen in that subgroup for the combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine. Further studies are needed to better identify such subgroups that may most benefit from the combination treatment.     

Correlation between arterial spin-labeling perfusion and histopathological vascular density of pediatric intracranial tumors

A single institution retrospective evaluation of nivolumab following disease progression on bevacizumab in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with an objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). There is no accepted therapy for recurrent GBM after failure of bevacizumab. 16 adults, ages 52–72 years (median 62), with recurrent GBM were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, and post-radiotherapy temozolomide. Bevacizumab (with or without lomustine) was administered to all patients at first recurrence. Patients were treated with nivolumab only (3 mg/kg) once every 2 weeks at second recurrence. One cycle of nivolumab was defined as 2 treatments. Neurological evaluation was performed bi-weekly and neuroradiographic assessment every 4 weeks. A total of 37 treatment cycles (median 2) were administered of nivolumab in which there were 14 Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) and Grade 3 AEs in two patients. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were seen. Following 1 month of nivolumab, seven patients demonstrated progressive disease and discontinued therapy. No patient demonstrated a response though nine patients demonstrated neuroradiographic stable response. Survival in the entire cohort ranged from 2 to 6 months with a median of 3.5 months (CI 2.8, 4.2). Median and 6-month PFS at 6 months was 2.0 months (range 1–5 months; CI 1.3, 2.7) and 0% respectively. Nivolumab salvage therapy demonstrated no survival advantage in patients with recurrent bevacizumab refractory GBM emphasizing a continued unmet need in neuro-oncology.     

Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, increases survival when combined with irinotecan-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This randomized, phase II trial compared bevacizumab plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV) versus placebo plus FU/LV as first-line therapy in patients considered nonoptimal candidates for first-line irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had metastatic CRC and one of the following characteristics: age > or = 65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 or 2, serum albumin < or = 3.5 g/dL, or prior abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to FU/LV/placebo (n = 105) or FU/LV/bevacizumab (n = 104). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, response rate, response duration, and quality of life. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Median survival was 16.6 months for the FU/LV/bevacizumab group and 12.9 months for the FU/LV/placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; P = .16). Median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (FU/LV/bevacizumab) and 5.5 months (FU/LV/placebo); hazard ratio was 0.50; P = .0002. Response rates were 26.0% (FU/LV/bevacizumab) and 15.2% (FU/LV/placebo) (P = .055); duration of response was 9.2 months (FU/LV/bevacizumab) and 6.8 months (FU/LV/placebo); hazard ratio was 0.42; P = .088. Grade 3 hypertension was more common with bevacizumab treatment (16% v 3%) but was controlled with oral medication and did not cause study drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Addition of bevacizumab to FU/LV as first-line therapy in CRC patients who were not considered optimal candidates for first-line irinotecan treatment provided clinically significant patient benefit, including statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival.     

Bevacizumab and fotemustine for recurrent glioblastoma: a phase II study of AINO (Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology)

The optimal combination of bevacizumab with cytotoxic or cytostatic drugs in recurrent glioblastoma is unknown. We performed a phase 2 trial of combined bevacizumab and fotemustine for patients with glioblastoma at first relapse after radiotherapy and temozolomide. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate based on RANO criteria and toxicity. Fifty-four patients with recurrent GBM were enrolled. The authors observed a 6-month PFS rate of 42.6 % (95 % CI 29.3–55.2) and a median PFS of 5.2 months (95 % CI 3.8–6.6). The median OS was 9.1 months (95 % CI 7.3–10.3). Twenty-eight patients (52 %) had a radiographic response, and a significant neurological improvement with steroid reduction was observed in 25/42 symptomatic patients (60 %). MGMT promoter methylation was significantly associated with improved PFS in univariate analysis. Most unifocal tumors at baseline had a focal enhancing progression (76 %), while the diffuse non-enhancing progression accounted for 9.5 %. Response or survival were not associated with any pattern of progression. Survival after failure of treatment was short. Twelve out of 54 patients (22 %) discontinued fotemustine for grade 3/4 myelotoxicity, while 4/54 (7.4 %) discontinued bevacizumab. This study failed to demonstrate a superiority of the combination of bevacizumab and fotemustine over either bevacizumab or fotemustine alone as historical controls. Future studies should explore alternative regimens of combination of the two drugs.     

Limited impact of prognostic factors in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with a bevacizumab-based regimen

Bevacizumab has demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. However, the impact of prognostic factors associated with recurrent glioblastoma treated with cytotoxic agents has not been determined in patients treated with bevacizumab. To analyze the prognostic factors and clinical benefits of bevacizumab and irinotecan treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. This monocentric study retrospectively analyzed all patients with recurrent glioblastoma who were treated with at least one cycle of bevacizumab and irinotecan at our institution from April 2007 to May 2010. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) from the initiation of bevacizumab administration. Among the 100 patients that were identified (M/F: 65/35), the median age was 57.9 years (range: 18–76). Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was <70 in 44 patients and ≥70 in 56 patients; 83 % of the patients were on steroids. The median tumor area was 2012 mm². The median progression free survival was 3.9 months (CI 95 %: 3.4–4.3). The median OS was 6.5 months (CI 95 %: 5.6–7.4). Multivariate analysis revealed that OS was affected by KPS (p = 0.024), but not by gender, age, steroid treatment, number of previous lines of treatment, tumor size, or time from initial diagnosis. KPS was improved in 30 patients, including 14/44 patients with an initial KPS <70. The median duration of maintained functional independence (KPS ≥70) was 3.75 months (CI 95 %: 2.9–4.6). The median OS from initial diagnosis was 18.9 months (CI 95 %: 17.5–20.3). In patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab, KPS was revealed as the only factor to impact OS. The clinical benefits associated with this regimen appear valuable. A positive impact of bevacizumab administration on OS of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is suggested.     

Retrospective analysis of 24 recurrent glioblastoma after chemoradiation and treated with nitrosoureas or irinotecan and bevacizumab

Despite progress in the initial management of glioblastoma (GB), the vast majority of patients will experience recurrence within 2-3 years. The medical treatment of these recurrences is being modified by the use of antiangiogenic therapies. Twenty-four patients, who relapsed from GB after chemoradiation followed by adjuvant temozolomide in Rennes, were treated by conventional chemotherapy (nitrosourea) or by the combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab. In this retrospective analysis, overall survival from diagnosis of recurrence was significantly longer in patients treated with the combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan than with nitrosourea (5 months versus 11.5 months). The combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab appeared to provide clinical benefit to patients with recurrent GB.     

Rechallenge treatment with a platinum-based regimen in patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Among patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), those who relapse?>?90 days after first-line chemotherapy are classified sensitive relapse. Rechallenge with a first-line platinum-based regimen has been used in sensitive relapsed SCLC patients, but its importance is not known. We evaluated the outcome of rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy for sensitive relapse patients. We reviewed consecutive patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC who received second-line chemotherapy between January 1999 and December 2016. We evaluated the treatment outcomes of platinum-based rechallenge and non-rechallenge regimens for second-line chemotherapy in sensitive relapse patients. Of 245 patients, 81 sensitive relapse patients received second-line chemotherapy. Sixty-seven patients (82.7%) were treated with rechallenging platinum-based regimens (“rechallenge group”) and 14 patients (17.3%) were treated with other regimens (“non-rechallenge group”) as second-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months in the rechallenge group and 3.5 months in the non-rechallenge group, and median survival time was 10.8 and 8.2 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in PFS or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Sub-analyses of patients who received chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment showed that the rechallenge group had longer PFS than that of the non-rechallenge group (median 5.4 vs. 3.6 months, p?=?0.0038), and the rechallenge group had a tendency to have longer OS than non-rechallenge group. These data suggest that rechallenge treatment with a platinum-based regimen could be second-line chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, especially those treated with chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus capecitabine and irinotecan regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer

Recent phase III trials have proven the fact that adding bevacizumab to irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) should be preferred as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). But, since the data regarding bevacizumab administered together with capecitabin, an oral fluoropyrimidine, and irinotecan in patients with mCRC is limited, we aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with capecitabine plus irinotecan (BEV-CAPIRI) regimen in mCRC patients. Records of patients treated with BEV-CAPIRI regimen between January 2005 and March 2008 were reviewed. Efficacy data regarding response rates (RR) as well as safety data were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were done by using the Kaplan–Meier method. A total number of 53 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were treated with BEV-CAPIRI regimen. The median age of this population was 57.3 ± 11.5 (range 29–78). The treatment was well tolerated. The RR was 43.3%, while 30.1% of the patients achieved stable disease (SD). Median PFS and OS were 12.6 ± 1.4 and 20.6 ± 1.7 months, respectively. However, median OS was 21.3 months for male and 14.6 months for female patients. In addition, median OS and PFS was 25.3 months and 16.2 months for the patients who received BEV-CAPIRI as first-line treatment, respectively, and for the other patients it was 15.2 months and 10.2 months, respectively. In conclusion, BEV-CAPIRI is an effective and well-tolerated alternative regimen for mCRC, leading to disease control in a vast majority of patients with mCRC.     

Phase II study of MEDI-575, an anti-platelet-derived growth factor-α antibody,in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

MEDI-575, an immunoglobulin G2κ monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to platelet-derived growth factor-α receptor (PDGFR-α) with high specificity. This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of MEDI-575 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Adults with first recurrence of glioblastoma following surgery, temozolomide, and radiation received MEDI-575 25 mg/kg intravenously over 60 min every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Six-month progression-free survival rate (PFS-6) was the primary end point; secondary measures included response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. PDGFR-α expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Fifty-six patients were enrolled; median age was 56.5 years (range 23–79), 66?% were male, and 66?% were aged ≥65 years. PFS-6 was 15.4?% [90?% confidence interval (CI) 8.1–24.9]. No complete or partial responses were observed; 23 (41.1?%) patients had stable disease as best response. Median PFS was 1.4 months (90?% CI 1.4, 1.8); median OS was 9.7 months (90?% CI 6.5, 11.8). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (16?%), nausea (13?%), and fatigue (13?%). Twelve (21?%) patients reported grade ≥3 AEs, with hydrocephalus (n?=?3), dysphagia (n?=?2), and convulsion (n?=?2) reported in more than 1 patient. Two patients had treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs of decreased lymphocyte count and asthenia (n?=?1 each). Seven patients (13?%) discontinued MEDI-575 owing to AEs. Labeling of PDGFRα in glioblastoma cells and tumor-associated stromal cells was highly variable, with no correlation with PFS. MEDI-575, although well tolerated, had limited clinical activity in recurrent glioblastoma.     

Phase II open-label study of nintedanib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) is a small, orally available, triple angiokinase inhibitor in phase III development (various indications) that targets VEGFR 1–3, FGFR 1–3, and PDGFR-α/β. This open-label, uncontrolled, phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who had previously failed radiotherapy plus temozolomide as first-line therapy (STUPP), or the same regimen with subsequent bevacizumab-based therapy as second-line treatment (BEV). Patients with a performance status of 0–1, histologically proven GBM, and measurable disease (by RANO) were enrolled. Nintedanib was given orally at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (bid), with magnetic resonance imaging undertaken every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The study was stopped prematurely following a preplanned futility analysis after inclusion of 13 patients in the STUPP arm and 12 in the BEV arm. Best response was stable disease (SD) in three patients (12 %); all other patients progressed within the first four 28-day cycles. One patient in the BEV arm has had SD for 17+ months. Median progression-free survival was 1 month and median overall survival was 6 months. Nintedanib had an acceptable safety profile, with no CTCAE grade 3–4 adverse events. Common adverse events were CTCAE grade 1–2 fatigue, loss of appetite, diarrhea, and nausea. Single-agent nintedanib (200 mg bid) demonstrated limited, but clinically non-relevant antitumor activity in patients with recurrent GBM who had failed 1–2 prior lines of therapy.     

Procarbazine, carmustine, and vincristine (PBV) for chemotherapy pre-treated patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a single-institution analysis

In newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme, surgery, combined radio and chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide is the standard of care. Therapy for recurrent glioblastoma is less well established and comprises re-operation, re-irradiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, inhibition of neoangiogenesis, and others. In this observational study we recorded the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of procarbazine, carmustine, and vincristine (PBV) for 69 patients with recurrent and/or progressive glioblastoma after surgery, concomitant radio and/or chemotherapy, and adjuvant first-line temozolomide therapy. Of 41 patients evaluable for response by MRI, partial response was observed for one, minor response for three, stable disease for at least 6 weeks for ten, and immediate progression for 27. Median PFS was 15 weeks, and PFS-6 was 21 % for 57 patients who could be followed; 12 other patients were lost to follow-up after application of the first PBV cycle. Grade III or IV leucopenia and/or grade III or IV thrombocytopenia were seen in 26 % and 26 % of cycles, respectively. Haematological complications led to interruption of treatment for four (7 %) patients. Non-haematological toxicity was moderate. Salvage PBV therapy in recurrent and/or progressive glioblastoma, pre-treated with temozolomide-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, is of limited efficacy with a small number of long-term survivors, but is hampered by relevant myelotoxicity.     

Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab combination therapy in Chinese population with advanced non-squamous NSCLC: data of subgroup analyses from MO19390 (SAiL) study

Background

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody with high antitumor activity against malignant diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of first-line bevacizumab combination therapy in advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). SAiL (MO19390), an open-label, multicenter, single-arm study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based treatment in clinical practice. This report presents the results of a subgroup analysis of Chinese patients enrolled in SAiL.

Methods

Chemo-naive Chinese patients with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent NSCLC were randomized to receive Bev 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus carboplatin + paclitaxel for maximum of six cycles, followed by single-agent bevacizumab until disease progression. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included time to progression and overall survival.

Results

The Chinese intent-to-treat (ITT) population consists of 198 Chinese patients, among whom 107 (54 %) were non-smokers and 90 (45.5 %) were female. The median cycle of bevacizumab administration was 10 and median duration of bevacizumab treatment was 29.5 weeks. Only eight cases of severe adverse events were observed in the study, which were deemed to be related to bevacizumab. The incidence of AEs over grade 3 in Chinese ITT patients was generally low (<9 %). No new safety signals were reported. Objective response rate in 195 evaluable Chinese patients was 68.8 %, including four complete responses (2.1 %). Time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival were 8.8 and 18.5 months, respectively.

Conclusions

The safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based treatment in Chinese population with advanced NS-NSCLC are consistent with those in previous studies as well as in Asian subgroup population from SAiL study. No new safety signals were reported.     

Phase I trial of dose-escalating metronomic temozolomide plus bevacizumab and bortezomib for patients with recurrent glioblastoma

The average survival time for patients with recurrent glioblastoma is between 5 and 9 months. Phase I and II trials have shown a modest survival benefit with combination temozolomide and other chemotherapeutics. We conducted a phase I trial of dose-escalating temozolomide with bevacizumab and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib for patients with recurrent disease. Three groups of three patients were scheduled to receive daily doses of temozolomide at 25, 50, and 75 mg/m². Fixed doses of bortezomib and bevacizumab were given at standard intervals. Patients were monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide with this regimen. No DLT were seen in the first two groups (25 and 50 mg/m² temozolomide). One patient in the 75 mg/m² group experienced a grade 4 elevation of ALT and three more patients were accrued for a total of six patients at that dose level. No other DLT occurred, thus making 75 mg/m² the MTD. Progression-free survival was 3.27 months for all patients and mean overall survival was 20.75 months. The MTD of temozolomide was 75 mg/m² in combination with bevacizumab and bortezomib for recurrent glioblastoma. Only one patient experienced a severe (Grade 4) elevation of ALT. This study will provide the framework for further studies to elicit effectiveness and better determine a safety profile for this drug combination.     

Intra-arterial carboplatin as a salvage strategy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

The first-line treatment of glioblastoma typically consists of a maximal surgical resection, followed by a combination of radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide. There is however no consensus regarding optimal therapeutic approaches at relapse. The following phase II study explored the therapeutic gain obtained when exposing these patients to a combination of intra-arterially administered carboplatin and melphalan at first or second relapse as a salvage treatment in recurrent glioblastoma. Fifty-one consecutive patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were accrued and offered this treatment at first or second relapse. A Karnofsky score of ≥60 was required, and when appropriate, patients were first reoperated prior to accrual. Patients enrolled were treated every 4 weeks (1 cycle) for up to 12 cycles. Progression was evaluated by Macdonald criteria. Primary end point surrogates were overall survival from diagnosis and study entry. Median survival from diagnosis and study entry was 23 and 11 months, respectively. The median time to progression was 5.2 months. All patients enrolled were treated for a minimum of 2 cycles. Hematologic toxicity was manageable, with an 8 % of grade II neutropenia, 12 % of grade II thrombocytopenia and 7 % of grade III thrombocytopenia. This therapeutic strategy represents an adequate option in the second-line treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The adjunction of an osmotic permeabilization could be considered to further expand delivery, and hopefully improve survival in these patients.     

Re-irradiation with and without bevacizumab as salvage therapy for recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas

The optimal treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas is unknown and a standard of care does not exist. Re-irradiation with concomitant bevacizumab represents an option. Retrospectively, we analyzed a cohort of heavily pretreated patients (n = 14) with relapsing HGGs who underwent re-irradiation with conventional 3D-conformal or intensified modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Ten of them received re-irradiation in combination with bevacizumab. The study population consisted of eight GBMs and six anaplastic gliomas. All patients had previously undergone irradiation for first-line therapy, including seven patients with radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. Patients without contraindications started with two infusions of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg of body weight every other week) prior to re-irradiation and continued through re-irradiation until progression. The median patient age was 45 years with a median Karnofsky performance scale of 70. The median dose of re-irradiation was 41.6 Gy [39–55 Gy]. The median physical cumulative radiation dose was 101.6 Gy [65–110.4 Gy]. The median PFS from re-irradiation was 5.1 months [1.6–17.4] based on clinical and RANO criteria. Median OS from re-irradiation was 9.0 months [6.4–17.8]. We detected radionecrosis due to advanced imaging in one patient. Other toxicities were expected and attributable well known side effects of bevacizumab. This retrospective study provides additional feasibility and safety data of conventional 3D-conformal re-irradiation and IMRT in combination with bevacizumab in relapsing high-grade gliomas.     

FDG-PET predicts survival in recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan

Prognosis of recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) is poor, although bevacizumab has been documented in that context. This study aimed to determine the independent prognostic value of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of recurrent HGG after combined treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan, compared with other documented prognostic variables. Twenty-five adult patients with histologically proven HGG were included at recurrence. Brain FDG-PET imaging was performed within 6 weeks of starting chemotherapy with bevacizumab and irinotecan. Response based on MRI was assessed every 2 months according to revised assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Median PFS and OS were 4 months (range, 0.9-10.4 months) and 7.2 months (range, 1.2-41.7 months), respectively. At 6 months, PFS and OS rate were 16.0% and 72.0%. FDG uptake was the most powerful predictor of both PFS and OS, using either univariate or multivariate analysis, among all variables tested: histological grade, Karnofsky performance status, steroid intake, and number of previous treatments. Moreover, FDG uptake was also prognostic of response to bevacizumab-based therapy. This study provides the first evidence that pretreatment FDG-PET can serve as an imaging biomarker in recurrent HGG for predicting survival following anti-angiogenic therapy with bevacizumab.     

Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND:

The authors performed a phase 2 trial of combined protracted daily temozolomide and biweekly bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who had previously received radiation therapy and temozolomide.

METHODS:

There was no limit on the number of previous disease progressions or previous regimens allowed. Thirty‐two adult patients were enrolled. Patients received temozolomide 50 mg/m² daily and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days. Patients underwent physical examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks.

RESULTS:

The authors observed a 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) rate of 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6%‐33.7%) and a median PFS of 15.8 weeks. The median overall survival (OS) was 37 weeks, the 6‐month OS rate was 62.5% (95% CI, 43.5%‐76.7%), and the 12‐month OS rate was 31.3% (95% CI, 16.4%‐47.3%). Nine patients (28%) had a radiographic response, and 7 patients (22%) had disease progression within the first 8 weeks of treatment. Patterns of progression were available for 21 patients. The authors observed that 52% of patients (n = 11) progressed locally, 38% (n = 8) progressed with a diffuse pattern, and 10% (n = 2) progressed at a distant site. Two patients discontinued therapy secondary to toxicity (prolonged thrombocytopenia and grade 4 pancreatitis). One patient experienced grade 5 pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current study demonstrated that a regimen of combined daily temozolomide and biweekly bevacizumab had some activity and was well tolerated. However, the results obtained in this study were inferior to those observed in studies of bevacizumab monotherapy and of combined irinotecan and bevacizumab therapy. The current patient population was more heterogeneous and was pretreated more heavily than patients in previous studies. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Combined salvage therapies for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: evaluation of an interdisciplinary treatment algorithm

Glioblastoma multiforme patients presenting with recurrence following multimodality therapy have limited palliative treatment options when the major modalities of therapy including surgery, radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have been exhausted. The authors introduce a clinical and radiological indication-solving algorithm and provide outcome rates of a glioblastoma recurrence cohort. Sixty six consecutive adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent a combined scheme of salvage treatments consisting of reoperation, high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and chemotherapy were included in this prospective study and were compared to a historical control group of 24 recurrent glioblastoma patients who have been treated with intensive temozolomide chemotherapy as the only treatment modality. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 28–36 months). Median survival was 9 months for the entire cohort after salvage treatment and can be translated into a 3-month improvement in survival compared to the control group of patients with glioblastoma recurrence treated with temozolomide alone (P = 0.043). Toxicity and adverse events of reoperation, HDR brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy were quite favourable compared to intensive temomozolomide chemotherapy as the only treatment. Our experience suggests that a combined salvage treatment plan appears to be both feasible and effective and can be considered in selected patients affected by recurrent high grade gliomas. The authors’ clinical and radiological indication-solving algorithm may assist in providing the best possible salvage treatment for this difficult population.     

Postoperative seizures in meningioma patients: improving patient selection for antiepileptic drug therapy

The diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM) often carries a dismal prognosis, with a median survival of 14.6 months. A particular challenge is the diagnosis of GBM in the elderly population (age?>?75 years), who have significant comorbidities, present with worse functional status, and are at higher risk with surgical treatments. We sought to evaluate the impact of current GBM treatment, specifically in the elderly population. The authors undertook a retrospective review of all patients aged 75 or older who underwent treatment for GBM from 1997 to 2016. Patient outcomes were evaluated with regards to demographics, surgical variables, postoperative treatment, and complications. A total of 82 patients (mean age 80.5?±?3.8 years) were seen. Most patients presented with confusion (57.3%) and associated comorbidities, and prior anticoagulation use was common in this age group. Extent of resection (EOR) included no surgery (9.8%), biopsy (22.0%), subtotal resection (40.2%), and gross-total resection (23.2%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy included temozolomide (36.1%), radiation (52.5%), and bevacizumab (11.9%). A mean overall survival of 6.3?±?1.2 months was observed. There were 34 complications in 23 patients. Improved survival was seen with increased EOR only for patients without postoperative complications. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that complications (HR?=?5.43, 95% CI 1.73, 17.04, p?=?0.004) predicted poor outcome. Long-term survivors (>?12 months survival) and short-term survivors had similar median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (80 vs. 80, p?=?0.43), but long-term survivors had unchanged postoperative KPS (80 vs. 60, p?=?0.02) and no complications (0/9 vs. 23/72, p?=?0.04). The benefit of glioblastoma treatment in our series was limited by the postoperative complications and KPS. Presence of a complication served as an independent risk factor for worsened overall survival in this age group. It is likely that decreased patient function limits postoperative adjuvant therapy and predisposes to higher morbidity especially in this age group.