Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of medical abortions with mifepristone and misoprostol following the approval of medical abortion in Israel. METHODS: A retrospective review of 377 consecutive medical records at an ambulatory care unit of a university medical centre was performed, screening all women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Transvaginal ultrasonographic study and serum beta hCG measurement were performed 14-20 days after the procedure. The clinical outcome was defined as complete expulsion of intrauterine contents with (failed group) or without (successful group) surgical intervention. RESULTS: Surgical intervention was performed in 7.4% of patients. Residual products of conception were confirmed in 89%. Older age, previous spontaneous abortions, multigravidity, and earlier follow-up visit were independently associated with unsuccessful medical abortion. Significant differences were found in mean serum beta hCG and mean endometrial thickness in the successful versus failed procedure groups. CONCLUSIONS: Medical termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol is >90% effective. High risk group for failure of the procedure can be characterised. An algorithm of follow up using follow-up visit date, serum beta hCG and sonographic endometrial stripe is suggested to define high risk patients for failed medical abortion.     

延长米非司酮配伍米索前列醇序贯用药时间预防流产后出血的 …

目的 探讨米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止早孕的最佳剂量方案,以预防流产后出血,方法 对１６１２例妊娠≤４９天,要求药物终止妊娠的妇女,按２：１随机分为观察组,对照组。观察组１１８例,米非司酮首次剂量５０ｍｇ,继后每１２ｈ１次,每次２５ｍｇ（共６ｄ）,总剂量３００ｍｇ,于用药第３天晨加用米索前列醇６００μｇ,第４￣６天晨各加服２００μｇ,总量１２００μｇ。对照组４９４例,米非司酮首次剂量５０ｍｇ,继后第     

Management of missed abortion: comparison of medical treatment with either mifepristone + misoprostol or misoprostol alone with surgical evacuation. A multi-center trial in Copenhagen county,Denmark

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two different medical treatment regimens: mifepristone 600 mg orally + misoprostol 0.4 mg vaginally (Mf + Ms) or misoprostol 0.4 mg vaginally (Ms) with conventional surgical evacuation (SE) in women with missed abortion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective crossover study with alternating regimens every 4 months. The three university clinics of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Gentofte, Herlev and Glostrup of Copenhagen County. During the period October 1999 to October 2000, 176 women with missed abortion accepted to participate in the study. RESULTS: The proportion of women who needed surgical evacuation after medical treatment, number of women who needed re-evacuation after primary surgical evacuation, duration of vaginal bleeding, treated infections, need of analgesics, and the subjective experiences from the participating women. Fifty-four, 73 and 49 patients were randomized to Mf + Ms, Ms and SE, respectively. Within 1 week, complete expulsion occurred in 40 (74%), 52 (71%), 47 (96%) of the three arms, respectively. Duration of bleeding was 6.9, 7.1 and 2.5 days in the three arms, respectively (p < 0.01). Women with an initial plasma chorionic gonadotrophine (p-hCG) between 2000 and 20 000 IU/l and a gestational age less than 75 days had a significantly better response to the medical treatment than those not fulfilling these two criteria. Initial p-progesterone did not correlate with success of medical treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of women who needed surgical evacuation after medical treatment, and the number of women who needed re-evacuation after primary surgical evacuation, duration of vaginal bleeding, treated infections, the need of analgesics, and subjective experiences from participating women. CONCLUSION: Vaginal misoprostol 0.4-0.6 mg is effective in most patients with missed abortion. Pre-treatment with the antiprogesterone mifepristone does not increase the success rate. The selection of women with missed abortion for medical treatment based on gestational age and initial p-hCG level may increase the success of medical treatment significantly.     

Medical termination of pregnancy at 63 to 83 days gestation

Objective To assess the efficacy of a medical regimen for the termination of pregnancy within the gestational age range of 63 to 83 days.
Design Prospective observational study.
Setting Gynaecology department within a district general hospital.
Population Women attending t0068e pregnancy advisory clinic between June 1996 and December 1997.
Methods The medical regimen used was mifepristone 200 mg orally followed after 36 to 48 h by misoprostol 800 μg administered vaginally.
Main outcome measures The success rate of the medical termination of pregnancy regimen, where success was defined as achieving complete abortion without the need for secondary intervention by either surgical or repeat medical means.
Results Primary medical termination of pregnancy was chosen by 253 (80.8%) of the 313 women and was successful in 239 (94.5%). Repeat medical treatment achieved completion of the abortion in a further three women (1.2%) and surgical evacuation of the uterus was required in 10 (4.0%). One woman declined further intervention after failed medical treatment but subsequently miscarried.
Conclusions The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is effective for the termination of pregnancy for gestations of 63 to 83 days.     

Medical termination of pregnancy at 63 to 83 days gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a medical regimen for the termination of pregnancy within the gestational age range of 63 to 83 days. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Gynaecology department within a district general hospital. POPULATION: Women attending the pregnancy advisory clinic between June 1996 and December 1997. METHODS: The medical regimen used was mifepristone 200 mg orally followed after 36 to 48 h by misoprostol 800 microg administered vaginally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The success rate of the medical termination of pregnancy regimen, where success was defined as achieving complete abortion without the need for secondary intervention by either surgical or repeat medical means. RESULTS: Primary medical termination of pregnancy was chosen by 253 (80.8%) of the 313 women and was successful in 239 (94.5%). Repeat medical treatment achieved completion of the abortion in a further three women (1.2%) and surgical evacuation of the uterus was required in 10 (4.0%). One woman declined further intervention after failed medical treatment but subsequently miscarried. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is effective for the termination of pregnancy for gestations of 63 to 83 days.     

A comparison of 600 and 200 mg mifepristone prior to second trimester abortion with the prostaglandin misoprostol

Objective To compare the use of 600 and 200 mg mifepristone prior to second trimester termination of pregnancy with the prostaglandin misoprostol.
Design A randomised study. Setting A Scottish teaching hospital.
Participants Seventy women undergoing legal induced abortion between 13 and 20 weeks of gestation.
Intervention Administration of either 600 or 200 mg mifepristone 36 to 48 hours prior to prostaglandin.
Main outcome measure Induction-abortion interval.
Results The geometric mean induction abortion interval was 6.9 (95 % CI 5.8–8.4) h and 6.9 (95 % CI 5.8–8.2) h in the 600 and 200 mg groups, respectively (no significant difference). The median dose of misoprostol was 1600 pg (three doses) in each group. Analgesic requirements and prostaglandin-related side effects were similar between groups. Overall, 11-4% of women required surgical evacuation of the uterus as a result of retained placenta.
Conclusions The dose of mifepristone used in second trimester abortion can be reduced from 600 to 200 mg.     

Regimens of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse effects and acceptability of the three most common misoprostol regimens used with mifepristone for medical abortion. DESIGN: Randomised nonblinded trial. SETTING: Three clinics associated with major research universities in Canada; two in major urban areas and one in a periurban area. POPULATION: Women of reproductive age. METHODS: Consenting women presenting for abortion services with gestations less than 56 days and who met inclusion criteria were given 200 mg mifepristone orally and then randomised into three misoprostol study groups: (group I) 400 micrograms of oral misoprostol, (group II) 600 micrograms of oral misoprostol, and (group III) 800 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol. Misoprostol was self-administered at home 24-48 hours following mifepristone, and participants were instructed to take a second similar misoprostol dose at 24 hours after the initial dose if bleeding was less than a normal menstrual period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful abortion without surgery was 94.1%, with no significant differences across the three study groups (94.7% in group I, 93.4% in group II, and 94.3% in group III; P= 0.975). RESULTS: Efficacy and adverse effects did not differ significantly across the three study groups. Pain increased significantly across the study and the gestational age groups and was associated with lower acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a range of safe and effective options for early medical abortion with mifepristone including a choice between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol.     

Randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of same-day administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy with the standard 36 to 48 hour protocol

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol 6 hours later compared with the standard 36- to 48-hour regimen for medical termination of pregnancy. DESIGN: Single centre, two arm, parallel, open randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Medical termination service at a teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Four hundred and fifty women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy at up to 63 days of gestation. METHODS: Eligible women were randomised to receive mifepristone 200 mg orally followed by vaginal misoprostol 800 micrograms either 6 hours (n=225) or 36-48 hours (n=225) later. All participants were invited to attend for a follow-up pelvic ultrasound scan within 7 days following the misoprostol administration. For those women in whom products of conception remained at the follow-up ultrasound scan, expectant management ensued with weekly follow-up ultrasound scans until the termination was complete. They could elect to undergo an evacuation of uterus at any stage following the scan. Those women with a nonviable gestation sac at the follow-up scan were offered a further dose of vaginal misoprostol 800 micrograms or suction termination of pregnancy. Women with a continuing pregnancy were managed with surgical termination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Successful medical abortion defined as no requirement for medical or surgical intervention beyond the initial dose of misoprostol. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five women (79%) in the 6-hour group and 197 women (92%) in the 36- to 48-hour group had a successful termination at first follow-up ultrasound or presumed on the basis of other considerations (those not seen for ultrasound but deemed successful by negative pregnancy test, products passed on ward or long-term assessment of notes). Twenty-two women (10%) in the 6-hour regimen required up to three further ultrasound scans after 7 days following the mifepristone administration in order to ensure that the termination process was complete. None of these women required a suction evacuation of uterus. In the 36- to 48-hour regimen, ten (5%) women had up to two further ultrasound scans to confirm a complete termination without the need for a surgical evacuation of uterus. Therefore, the overall successful termination rate in the 6-hour regimen was 89% (187/210) compared with 96% (207/215) in the 36- to 48-hour regimen (relative risk=0.92, 95% CI 0.84-0.98). Repeat administration of misoprostol or surgical treatment was required in 23 women (11%) in the 6-hour group and 8 women (4%) in the 36- to 48-hour group. A viable pregnancy was found in five women (2%) in the 6-hour group and in three women (1%) in the 36- to 48-hour group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral mifepristone 200 mg followed by vaginal misoprostol 800 micrograms after 6 hours is not as effective at achieving a complete abortion compared with the 36- to 48-hour protocol.     

Early pregnancy termination with intravaginally administered sodium chloride solution-moistened misoprostol tablets: historical comparison with mifepristone and oral misoprostol

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the abortifacient effect of intravaginally administered moistened misoprostol tablets with that of the combination regimen of mifepristone and oral misoprostol. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred women at 相似文献   

Medical abortion in the first trimester

Pregnancy can be terminated safely by inducing abortion medically at any stage of gestation. Antagonists such as mifepristone block the action of progesterone and hence result in uterine contractions and increase the sensitivity of the uterus to prostaglandins. In the last 15 years the combination of a single dose of mifepristone (600 mg) followed 48 hours later with a suitable prostaglandin (1 mg gemeprost vaginal pessary or 400 microg oral misoprostol) has been licensed in most countries in Europe and the USA for induction of abortion in the early weeks of pregnancy. The safety and efficacy of these methods is comparable to vacuum aspiration at the same gestation. The complete abortion rate is related to the type and dose of prostaglandin, the route of administration as well as the gestation and parity. Published data suggest that the dose of mifepristone can be reduced from 600 mg to 200 mg without loss of efficacy. Although misoprostol tablets are formulated for oral use, extensive clinical experience has demonstrated vaginal administration is more effective and is associated with fewer side-effects. Successful abortion using medical methods requires a well organized service which includes referral without delay and a robust system of follow up to identify failures. The failure rate as reflected by the number of women who require surgical intervention falls with increasing experience. In those countries where medical abortion has been freely available for about 10 years, such as France, Scotland and Sweden, about 60-70% of eligible women elect for this method.     

First trimester abortion with mifepristone and three doses of sublingual misoprostol: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a medical abortion regimen with multiple doses of sublingual misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone. METHODS: The regimen was designed on the basis of pharmacokinetics of various routes of administration of misoprostol. Forty women < or = 8 weeks' gestation were given mifepristone 200 mg orally, followed 24 h later by three doses of misoprostol 200 microgm sublingually 6 h apart. They were followed up on day 3 and day 14 with transvaginal ultrasound. Pain and bleeding were assessed using a visual analogue scale and acceptability, by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Abortion outcome was assessed in terms of onset of pain and vaginal bleeding, time of expulsion of products and duration of vaginal bleeding. Seventy-five per cent of women experienced pain within 2 h after first dose of misoprostol. Bleeding began at a mean of 1.41 h after pain and expulsion at a mean of 6.1 h after first dose of misoprostol. Complete expulsion was confirmed in all women (100%) by ultrasound on day 14. The longest duration of bleeding was 12 days (mean 7.2 days) with 87.5% bleeding for < 10 days. Acceptability was 100% but 70% perceived pain to be moderate and 67.5% bleeding to be light or slightly more than menses. CONCLUSIONS: Medical abortion using three doses of sublingual misoprostol administered 24 h after mifepristone appears to be the most appropriate in terms of pharmacokinetics of the drugs. This pilot study associates the regimen with a short abortion process, which appears to be safe, highly efficacious and acceptable.     

Early pregnancy termination with intravaginally administered sodium chloride solution–moistened misoprostol tablets: Historical comparison with mifepristone and oral misoprostol

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the abortifacient effect of intravaginally administered moistened misoprostol tablets with that of the combination regimen of mifepristone and oral misoprostol. Study Design: One hundred women at ≤56 days’ gestation received 800 μg misoprostol intravaginally in the form of sodium chloride solution–moistened tablets. The dose was repeated 24 hours later if a gestational sac persisted on ultrasonographic examination. These 100 subjects (group 1) were then matched with 100 subjects who had received 600 mg mifepristone followed by 400 μg misoprostol orally as part of a large multicenter American trial (group 2). Subjects were monitored for abortion success, adverse side effects, and bleeding characteristics. Abortion failure was defined as persistence of an intrauterine sac or the need to perform a surgical evacuation of the uterus for hemorrhage, for incomplete abortion, or at the subject’s request. Results: In 88 of the 100 women in group 1 and 94 of the 100 women in group 2, abortion occurred and a surgical procedure was not required. Abortion rates were not influenced by gestational age in either group. Prostaglandin-related side effects of fever and chills, vomiting, diarrhea, and uterine pain were all significantly higher in group 1. Excessive uterine bleeding was uncommon in both groups, and no subjects received blood transfusions. Conclusion: The abortion rate with intravaginally administered moistened misoprostol tablets is similar to that with the combination of mifepristone and oral misoprostol. However, intravaginal administration of misoprostol is associated with significantly more prostaglandin-related side effects. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1386-91.)     

Are two doses of misoprostol after mifepristone for early abortion better than one?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if a repeat dose of misoprostol following mifepristone or a single dose of misoprostol increases the efficacy of medical termination of pregnancy. DESIGN: Randomised, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: K.E.M. Hospital, Pune, India, and the Health Centre, Larsen and Toubro Limited, Mumbai, India. SAMPLE: A total of 300 women seeking an abortion with amenorrhoea of 8 weeks or less. Methods Women were randomised to receive one or two doses of 400 microgram oral misoprostol at the clinic 48 hours after administration of 200 mg mifepristone. Main outcome measure Complete abortion without surgical intervention. Results The repeat administration of misoprostol 400 microgram improved the complete abortion rate from 86 to 92% and significantly reduced the rate of continuing pregnancy from 7 to 1%. Almost all the women who were administered the additional dose of misoprostol were either very satisfied (58%) or satisfied (37%) with the method. Conclusion While an additional oral dose of 400 microgram misoprostol did not significantly increase the rate of complete abortion without surgical intervention, the additional dose did significantly reduce the rate of continuing pregnancies without compromising the acceptability and ease of use of the method.     

Mifepristone 100 mg in abortion regimens

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical efficacy of mifepristone 100 mg followed 2 days later by misoprostol 400 microg orally or 800 microg vaginally in women at up to 49 days' gestation. METHODS: Eighty participants received mifepristone 100 mg and then were randomized to misoprostol, administered 48 hours later, at a dose of 400 microg orally (group 1) or 800 microg vaginally (group 2). Women returned for follow-up evaluations 24 +/- 1 hour after using the misoprostol and then 2-3 weeks later. If abortion still had not occurred and the pregnancy was nonviable, the subject returned again after an additional 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after receiving misoprostol, 34 (85%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71%, 94%) of the 40 women in group 1 and 38 (95%; 95% CI 85%, 99%) of the 40 women in group 2 had complete abortions. Overall, complete abortion without surgical intervention occurred in 34 women in group 1 (85%; 95% CI 71%, 94%) and 40 women in group 2 (100%; 95% CI 91%, 100%; P =.03). Four women in group 1 required suction aspiration for continuing pregnancy at the second follow-up, compared with none in group 2 (P =.12). Side effects occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Low-dose mifepristone (100 mg) combined with vaginal misoprostol 800 microg may be an effective alternative to regimens using 200 or 600 mg of mifepristone with misoprostol.     

Simultaneous use of mifepristone and misoprostol for early pregnancy termination

ObjectiveSimultaneous mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol 800 μg produces a complete abortion rate of approximately 90% at up to 63 days of gestation. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of concurrent administration of mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol 600 μg with respect to early medical abortion.Materials and MethodsA total of 254 women with undesired pregnancies of less than 49 days of gestation were enrolled. All women received oral mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol 600 μg concurrently. Follow-up assessment by transvaginal ultrasonography was performed 3 days and 2 weeks after treatment.ResultsEfficacy outcome was analyzed for 242 women (95.3%) after excluding 12 individuals lost to follow-up. The complete abortion rate was 92.6%. The mean induction to abortion interval was about 5.8 hours. The mean bleeding duration was about 12.6 days. The women indicated that the side effects were tolerable and 90% of them said that their experience was satisfactory.ConclusionConcurrent administration of oral mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol 600 μg is an efficacious regimen for medical abortion of pregnancies up to 49 days of gestation.     

Mifepristone followed in 24 hours to 48 hours by misoprostol for late first-trimester abortion

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol for the termination of pregnancies in the late first trimester. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 321 women seeking termination of pregnancy with gestations from 64 days to 84 days (+/-3 days) by vaginal ultrasonography. Women were enrolled at three sites: University of Rochester Reproductive Health Program in Rochester, New York; Hung Vuong Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; and K.E.M. Hospital in Pune, India. Eligible women received 800 mcg of misoprostol vaginally between 24 hours and 48 hours after administration of 200 mg mifepristone. Two additional doses of 400 mcg of misoprostol were administered either orally or vaginally as needed every 3 hours for a maximum of two additional doses (total 1,600 mcg). The primary study outcome measure was complete abortion without surgical intervention. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of women who completed the study successfully terminated their pregnancies. Most women were either satisfied (64.8%) or very satisfied (28.6%) with their experience. Ninety-four percent of women reported that they would recommend the procedure to a friend. Most women (90.4%) also agreed they would request a medical abortion if they required another abortion at this gestational age. CONCLUSION: Medical abortion is acceptable and effective in the late first trimester and offers women an acceptable alternative to surgical abortion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

Mifepristone and misoprostol and methotrexate/misoprostol in clinical practice for abortion

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, side-effect profile, and follow-up rates in women who obtain a medical abortion in a nonresearch setting. STUDY DESIGN: From December 1, 2000, to June 30, 2001, we prospectively followed 218 women who had been evaluated in our private office for medical abortion. Women received either mifepristone 200 mg orally followed 1 to 2 days later by self-administered misoprostol 800 microg vaginally or methotrexate 50 mg/m(2) intramuscularly followed 3 to 7 days later by self-administered misoprostol 800 microg vaginally. RESULTS: Of the 174 women who had a medical abortion, 148 women (85%) chose mifepristone/misoprostol, and 26 women (15%) chose methotrexate/misoprostol. In women up to 49 days of gestation, complete abortion occurred by the first follow-up visit in 82 of 86 women (95%; 95% CI, 89-99) and in 21 of 25 women (84%; 95% CI, 64-95) women, respectively. In women who used mifepristone/misoprostol from 50 to 63 days of gestation, complete abortions occurred in 56 of 59 women (95%; 95% CI, 86-99) women. Four women (2%; 95% CI, 1-6) were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Medical abortion with mifepristone/misoprostol and with methotrexate/misoprostol can be provided in a nonresearch setting with efficacy similar to that reported in the medical literature for research protocols.     

Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the acceptability of suction curettage abortion with that of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in American women. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective, serially enrolled, cohort analysis. The study population consisted of 152 subjects receiving mifepristone and misoprostol and 174 subjects undergoing suction curettage abortion aged > or =18 years with intrauterine pregnancies of up to 63 days' estimated gestation. Questionnaires regarding expectations and experiences were administered before the abortion and at the 2-week follow-up visit. RESULTS: Subjects undergoing medical abortions reported significantly greater satisfaction than those undergoing surgical abortions (mean rank, 121 vs 149; P <.01) but were no more likely to recommend the method they had just experienced to a friend (97% vs 93.3%). If a future abortion was required, however, 41.7% of subjects undergoing surgical abortions indicated they would opt for a medical abortion, whereas only 8.6% of subjects receiving medical abortions would choose a surgical abortion (P <.001). Failure of the abortion decreased satisfaction in the medical group and increased the likelihood of choosing a surgical abortion for a subsequent procedure (P <.001). Surgical subjects who experienced more anxiety than expected during the abortion were more likely to choose a medical procedure for a subsequent abortion (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Women receiving mifepristone and misoprostol were more satisfied with their method and more likely to choose the same method again than were subjects undergoing surgical abortion. Failure of a medical abortion and increased anxiety during surgical abortion were associated with preference for the alternative technique in a future procedure.     

Medical abortion from 12 through 14 weeks' gestation: a retrospective study with 126 patients

Objective

To assess the efficacy of medical abortion performed according to a single protocol from 12 through 14 weeks.

Study design

Retrospective observational study of medical abortions from 12 through 14 weeks performed from January 2007 through March 2009. The protocol combined 600 mg de mifepristone orally, followed 48 h later by 400 μg of misoprostol, administered orally, and repeated after 3 h, four times a day (during two days), if patient did not begin to abort. Outcome measures were the abortion rate, the rate of complication, the rate of manual uterine revision or vacuum aspiration, the time of expulsion and the misoprostol dose.

Results

The study included 126 medical abortions. The abortion rate was 98% and the secondary manual revision or vacuum aspiration rate was 41%. The mean time to expulsion was 10.4 (± 8.8) h, and the mean misoprostol dose 1040 (± 420) μg. Higher parity was significantly correlated with shorter time to expulsion (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Medical abortion was consistently effective from 12 through 14 weeks but with high rate of secondary manual revision or vacuum aspiration.     

Second trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly or death: comparing mifepristone/misoprostol to gemeprost

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of changing the regimen for second trimester induction of labour from gemeprost to mifepristone/misoprostol. DESIGN and SETTING: A retrospective study at a university teaching hospital over the 5-year period 1993-1997. SUBJECTS, METHODS and REGIMENS: 68 patients, 34 in the gemeprost group and 34 in the mifepristone/misoprostol group. The gemeprost group received 1mg vaginally every 3h to a maximum of five doses. The mifepristone/misoprostol group were pre-treated with 600 mg mifepristone orally followed by 800 microg misoprostol vaginally and then 400 microg orally every 3h to a maximum of four oral doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Induction to abortion interval; delivery within 24h. RESULTS: The mifepristone/misoprostol group had a lower induction to abortion interval compared to the gemeprost group (median 8.9h versus 19.8h, respectively, p<0.01). The mifepristone/misoprostol regimen was more successful than the gemeprost regimen; 94% versus 68%, respectively, aborted without extra medical or surgical intervention, p=0.02. There were no significant differences in side effects, analgesia requirements or complications between the two groups. Three patients with previous Caesarean sections had a ruptured uterus; two from the gemeprost group and one from the mifepristone/misoprostol group. CONCLUSIONS: The new mifepristone/misoprostol regimen was more effective in second trimester induction of labour. Induction of labour with misoprostol or gemeprost should be used with care in patients with a previous Caesarean section.