Effect of pre-repetfusion portal venous blood flush on early liver transplant function

Abstract  Portal venous blood for rinsing out the University of Wisconsin solution (UWs) has the advantages of being a physiological fluid, removing acidotic mesenteric venous blood and perhaps resulting in more stable haemodynamic parameters during reperfusion. A group of 209 consecutive adult OLTs carried out between July 1993 and February 1995 were studied prospectively. The UWs was flushed out with 500 ml portal blood in 95 OLTs (group 1) and with 1.0 L 0.5 % dextrose at 37° C in 114 OLTs (group 2). The median day 1 and peak day 1–5 AST levels were significantly elevated in the 5 % dextrose group: median 755 (118–11090) vs. 546 (121–6150) IU/l ( P = 0.007, Wilcoxon); and median 1095 (159–11090) vs. 744 (157–7870) IU/I ( p = 0.008, Wilcoxon), respectively. A median of 5 (0–27) units of blood were transfused in group 1 compared to 4 (0–54) units in group 2 (n.s.). There was no difference in peak bilirubin, lowest day 1–5 PT levels, primary nonfunction, median ITU stay, total inpatient stay and 1-month graft survival between the two groups (89 % vs. 88 %). Pre-reperfusion blood flush may be associated with less hepatocellular damage, without significant additional blood usage.     

A comparative prospective study of two available solutions for kidney and liver preservation

BACKGROUND: Viaspan (University of Wisconsin [UW]) solution is the gold standard for abdominal organ preservation. Celsior (CEL) is an extracellular-type, low-potassium, low-viscosity solution, initially used for heart and lung preservation. We have performed a prospective multicenter study to compare the role of these cold-storage solutions on kidney and liver recovery after transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 15, 2000 to December 31, 2001, 441 (172 CEL and 269 UW) renal transplants (RT) and 175 (79 CEL and 96 UW) liver transplants (LT) were included in the study. RESULTS: Perfusate volume used was significantly lower in the UW group, being 4,732 +/- 796 mL versus 5,826 + 834 mL in the CEL group (P < 0.001). In LT, median total bilirubin serum levels were significantly higher at 5 and 7 posttransplant days in the UW group (90.6 and 92.3 micromol/L, respectively) as compared with CEL (51.3 and 63.4 micromol/L, respectively). After LT, primary nonfunction (PNF) rates in the CEL and UW groups were 3.8% and 4.2% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 83.3% versus 85.4% (P = NS) and 89.9% versus 90.6% (P = NS). After RT, delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 23.2% and 22.7% (P = NS), respectively; PNF rates were 1.9% and 1.7% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 92.3% versus 94.2% (P = NS) and 99.4% versus 97.7% (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: CEL solution was shown to be as effective as UW in both liver and kidney preservation. In LT patients, biliary function recovery is significantly better in the CEL group. CEL solution represents an efficacious option in multiorgan harvesting.     

Celsior Versus University of Wisconsin Preserving Solutions for Liver Transplantation: Postreperfusion Syndrome and Outcome of a 5-Year Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background

Celsior solution (CS) is a high-sodium, low-potassium, low-viscosity extracellular solution that has been used for liver graft preservation in recent years, although experience with it is still limited. We performed an open-label randomized active-controlled trial comparing CS with the University of Wisconsin solution (UW) for liver transplantation (LT), with a follow-up period of 5?years.

Methods

Adult transplant recipients (n?=?102) were prospectively randomized to receive either CS (n?=?51) or UW (n?=?51). The two groups were comparable with respect to donor and recipient characteristics. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS). Secondary outcome measures included primary nonfunction (PNF) or primary dysfunction (PDF), liver retransplantation, and graft and patient survival. Other secondary outcome measures were days in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the rates of acute rejection, chronic rejection, infectious complications, postoperative reoperations, and vascular and biliary complications.

Results

In all, 14 posttransplant variables revealed no significant differences between the groups. There were no cases of PNF or PDF. The incidence of PRS was 5.9% in the CS group and 21.6% in the UW group (P?=?0.041). After reperfusion, CS revealed greater control of serum potassium (P?=?0.015), magnesium levels (P?=?0.005), and plasma glucose (P?=?0.042) than UW. Respective patient survivals at 3, 12, and 60?months were 95.7, 87.2, and 82.0% for the CS group and 95.7, 83.3, and 66.6% for the UW group (P?=?0.123).

Conclusions

While retaining the same degree of safety and effectiveness as UW for LT, CS may yield postliver graft reperfusion benefits, as shown in this study by a significant reduction in the incidence of PRS and greater metabolic control.     

A multicenter pilot prospective study comparing Celsior and University of Wisconsin preserving solutions for use in liver transplantation

Primary dysfunction (PDF) still occurs after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Celsior solution (CS) might offer some advantages over the conventional University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for organ preservation, but to date, this has not been prospectively evaluated in the context of OLT. In this prospective, randomized, multicenter, pilot study, 215 potential liver donors were enrolled and randomized. In 42 cases, the livers were unsuitable for transplantation; therefore, 173 randomized livers ultimately were implanted after perfusion and cold preservation with CS (n = 83) or UW solution (n = 90). In accord with the indications of the CS manufacturing company, total CS infusion volume was 90 mL/kg, greater than that of UW solution (60 mL/kg). The main aim of the study is to compare the prevalence of PDF between the two groups. Donor and recipient variables were similar in the two groups. Episodes of PDF were numerically lower in the CS (2.4%) than UW group (7.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant. There was a trend toward a lesser need for early re-OLT (<30 days) in the CS group (P = .0507), but again, no statistically significant difference emerged. Overall and time-differentiated postoperative deaths also were similar. One-year actuarial patient (UW, 89% v CS, 87%) and graft (UW, 83% v CS, 85%) survival rates were similar. In conclusion, CS was similar to UW solution as a preservation solution in the clinical setting of OLT at the infusion volumes described, although some theoretical advantages of CS composition suggest that CS might prove a valid alternative to UW preservation solution in multiorgan harvesting, including the liver. A study on a larger patient basis is needed. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:814-821.)     

Comparison of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions in cold preservation of liver from octogenarian donors

BACKGROUND: Celsior (CS) has recently been proposed as a cold storage solution for thoracic and abdominal organs. We compared University of Wisconsin (UW) and CS solutions for the preservation of livers from old donors, with regard to initial function as well as short- and long-term graft and patient survival. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study from 1998 to 2002 includes 30 livers from octogenarian donors preserved in CS (n = 15) or UW (n = 15) solution prior to transplantation. Donor and recipient clinical and laboratory parameters as well as liver biopsy results were evaluated in all cases. RESULTS: The distribution of the main donor variables as well as recipient characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean cold ischemia time was 421 minutes in the CS group and 474 minutes in the UW group. Mild steatosis was present in 8 cases in the CS group and 7 cases in the UW group. No primary graft dysfunction or arterial or biliary complications were noted. There was 1 acute rejection episode in the CS group and 4 in the UW group. Late postoperative deaths were observed only in the UW group (ie, 7 of 15). Actuarial graft survival was 100% in the CS group vs 86.7% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 52.5% in the UW group (P =.007) at 12 months. Patient survival was 100% in the CS group vs 93.3% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 59.3% in the UW group (P =.01) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both CS and UW solutions effectively protect livers obtained from donors >80 years of age during the early postoperative course but the CS group had better long-term results.     

Comparative study between living and cadaveric donors in pediatric liver transplantation

We examined whether the results in living-related hepatic transplantation (LRLT) are better than those from a cadaveric donor (CDLT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The last 27 consecutive LRLT, performed from 1998 to 2005, were compared with 27 CDLT matched for age, weight, date, and diagnosis. Grafts in LRLT group were left lateral segment (n = 22), left lobe (n = 3), and right lobe (n = 2). In the CDLT group, the grafts were split in situ (n = 10), hepatic reduction (n = 9) and whole liver (n = 8). We analyzed the actuarial survivals (grafts and children), retransplantation, primary nonfunction, initial graft malfunction (liver enzymes >2000 U/L), surgical complications, rejection, and resource consumption. RESULTS: Patient survivals at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were 100%, 96%, and 96% in LRLT and 100%, 100%, and 100% in CDLT (P = NS). Graft survivals were 93%, 89%, and 89% versus 96%, 96%, and 96%, respectively (P = NS). Complications were biliary complications (LRLT, 25% vs CDLT, 3%; P = .021); portal vein thrombosis (LRLT, 7% vs CDLT, 3%; NS), and hepatic artery thrombosis (LRLT, 0% vs CDLT, 3%; NS). The overall incidence of acute rejection was slightly higher (NS) in LRLT (LRLT, 18% vs CDLT, 11%; NS). Liver enzyme levels were higher in the CDLT group, but initial malfunction rate was not statistically different. Regarding resource consumption: blood product needs were higher in LRLT (P < .05) and hospital stay and ICU stay were longer, although not significantly, among LRLT. CONCLUSIONS: The results in LRLT among children are similar to those obtained in CDLT. We found a trend towards less initial graft malfunction in LRLT. Blood product needs were higher in LRLT. Hospital and ICU stay were longer, but not significantly different in LRLT. The benefits of LRLT are saving a scarce resource: a cadaveric donor liver graft.     

Comparison of UW solution and Euro-Collins solutions for cold preservation of human liver grafts

University of Wisconsin solution, a new organ preservation medium, is reported to extend the period of cold storage. In order to evaluate the efficacy of UW solution in human liver preservation we compared 58 donor liver grafts preserved in Euro-Collins (EC) solution. All livers were harvested in a similar manner. Donor and recipient characteristics in the two groups were comparable. The mean preservation time of the UW solution was 11.5 +/- 4.2 hr (range 3-20 hr), significantly longer than the EC mean preservation time of 4.9 +/- 1.6 hr (2-9.6 hr) (P = 0.0001). Evaluation of mean postoperative liver function tests and coagulation factors on days 1-7 showed no statistical difference between the two groups. There was one primary graft nonfunction in the EC group and none with the UW organs. Hepatic artery thrombosis was similar in each group. The incidence of early retransplantation was similar. Three-month graft survival was 81% in the UW group vs. 73% in the EC group. Patient survival at three months was 87% with the UW organs and 84% with the EC organs. We conclude that cold storage of liver grafts in the UW solution has allowed for significantly longer preservation, permitting transplantation to be performed under semielective conditions and procurement of organs from much further distances. Grafts stored in UW solution perform as well as those stored in Euro-Collins, with no significant difference in liver function abnormalities postoperatively.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: A safe and effective preservation solution is a precondition for successful orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study compared University of Wisconsin (UW) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solutions in OLT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 137 primary cadaveric. OLT performed between January 2003 and December 2006 at our institution. Sixty-eight grafts were harvested using UW and 69 using HTK. Recipients were managed similarly in regard to operative techniques and immunosuppression. We collected donor data including serum transaminases, serum sodium, ICU stay and assessed macroscopic liver quality. Recipient serum transaminases were collected on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, and 30. We compared biliary and vascular complications, as well as patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: Mean serum bilirubin levels were slightly higher in the HTK group at 1,7,14, and 30 days after transplantation, whereas transaminases were higher in the UW group. Primary nonfunction occurred in 1 patient in each group. Retransplantation was performed in 5 patients in the UW and in 9 patients in the HTK group. Biliary complication rates were similar in the UW and HTK groups (22% and 17%, respectively). Six arterial complications occurred in the HTK (8.7%) and 2 in the UW group (2.9%; P < .05). Mean follow-up was 25 months. Graft survival at 1, 12, and 36 months was 90%, 78%, and 75% versus 90%, 71%, and 71% in the UW versus HTK groups, respectively. One-, 12-, and 36-month patient survival rates were 93%, 78%, and 75% versus 93%, 78%, and 78% in the UW versus HTK groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in graft and patient survivals between the 2 groups. Whereas the biliary complication rates were comparable in both groups, the arterial complications were clearly higher in the UW group (8.7% vs 2.9%; P < .05%). UW and HTK solutions seemed to be equally safe and effective in the preservation of liver grafts. The high incidence of arterial complications in the UW group requires further prospective studies.     

Celsior Versus Wisconsin Solution in Pancreas Transplantation

Celsior solution (CS), which has recently become available, that might theoretically offer a new means for improving graft preservation quality. The present prospective, randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of CS compared with University of Wisconsin (UW) for pancreas allografts. Between January 2001 and January 2007, 88 patients underwent pancreatic transplantation, including the last 30 consecutive simultaneous pancreas kidney patients who were randomly assigned to either CS or UW. There was no case of graft thrombosis in either group. There were 2 cases of pancreatitis in the UW group compared with 1 in the CS group. No case of primary nonfunction occurred in either group. There were 2 cases of early duodenal stump fistulae in the CS group that required transplantectomy, whereas this complication was not observed in the UW group. Relaparotomy in the UW group was required in 3 cases due to infection and treated by close drainage that which, progressed to fatal sepsis in 1 patient. In the UW group with 6 months of follow-up, there were 12 patients insulin free. In the CS group, 6 patients underwent relaparotomy, 3 for transplantectomy and the others for intra-abdominal infection, which was fatal in 2 cases. In the CS group with 6 months of follow-up, there were 10 patients insulin free. Two patients died with functioning grafts. These results provided indirect evidence that CS solution is at least as safe as UW to mitigate postreperfusion graft edema and pancreatitis, as well as graft thrombosis.     

The impact of donor chemical overdose on the outcome of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: To overcome the critical shortage of liver grafts, many centers have been widening the acceptance criteria for liver donation. Use of liver grafts from victims who have suffered chemical overdose (COD) may be one option that could help to expand the donor pool. However, this practice has been poorly documented. METHODS: Of 1,195 orthotopic liver transplantations performed at our institution between June 1994 and March 2001, 22 involved livers (1.8%) were retrieved from COD donors. Donor and recipient characteristics and posttransplantation outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The main chemicals causing brain death of the donor were carbon monoxide (n=4), cocaine (n=4), tricyclic antidepressants (n=3), 3,4-methylenedioxy- methamphetamine (n=2), opiates (n=2), aspirin (n=1), gamma hydroxybutyrate (n=1), heroin (n=1), insulin (n=1), verapamil (n=1), barbiturate (n=1), and brompheniramine/phenylpropanolamine (n=1). Primary nonfunction developed in one patient who had received a liver from an 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-intoxicated donor. Another patient died of fungal meningitis 10 days after transplantation with a functioning graft. The remaining 20 patients experienced acceptable early graft function, as demonstrated by initial mean peak values of bilirubin (4.8 mg/dL), aspartate aminotransferase (624 U/L), and alanine aminotransferase (730 U/L). One-year graft survival rate estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory outcomes of graft function were achieved in orthotopic liver transplantations from COD donors. The cautious use of liver grafts from selected COD donors may be a worthwhile method of increasing the availability of scarce donor organs.     

大鼠肝脏保存中不同器官保存液对肝细胞凋亡的影响

目的 研究３种目前国内常用的器官保存液对供肝细胞凋亡的影响。方法 分别用ＵＷ液、ＨＣ－Ａ液和ＷＭＯ－１号液灌洗并保存大鼠肝脏,于保存后０、１２、２４ｈ用原位末端标记法检测供肝细胞凋亡情况,并将保存２４ｈ的肝及行大鼠原位全肝移植,观察受者的３ｄ存活率。结果 ３种保存液保存的肝脏均在保存１２ｈ时出现细胞凋亡,ＨＣ－Ａ液级瑟ＷＭＯ－１号液组的凋亡指数（ＡＩ）高于ＵＷ液组（Ｐ〈０．００１）,而ＨＣ－Ａ液组     

Liver Transplantation Using University of Wisconsin or Celsior Preserving Solutions in the Portal Vein and Euro-Collins in the Aorta

Introduction

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is today the gold standard treatment of the end-stage liver disease. Different solutions are used for graft preservation. Our objective was to compare the results of cadaveric donor OLT, preserved with the University of Wisconsin (UW) or Celsior solutions in the portal vein and Euro-Collins in the aorta.

Methods

We evaluated retrospectively 72 OLT recipients, including 36 with UW solution (group UW) and 36 with Celsior (group CS). Donors were perfused in situ with 1000 mL UW or Celsior in the portal vein of and 3000 mL of Euro-Collins in the aortia and on the back table managed with 500 mL UW or Celsior in the portal vein, 250 mL in the hepatic artery, and 250 mL in the biliary duct. We evaluated the following variables: donor characteristics, recipient features, intraoperative details, reperfusion injury, and steatosis via a biopsy after reperfusion. We noted grafts with primary nonfunction (PNF), initial poor function (IPF), rejection episodes, biliary duct complications, hepatic artery complications, re-OLT, and recipient death in the first year after OLT.

Results

The average age was 33.6 years in the UW group versus 41 years in the CS group (P = .048). There was a longer duration of surgery in the UW group (P = .001). The other recipient characteristics, ischemia-reperfusion injury, steatosis, PNF, IPF, rejection, re-OLT, and recipient survival were not different. Stenosis of the biliary duct occured in 3 (8.3%) cases in the UW group and 8 (22.2%) in the CS (P = .19) with hepatic artery thrombosis in 4 (11.1%) CS versus none in the UW group (P = .11).

Conclusion

Cadaveric donor OLT showed similar results with organs preserved with UW or Celsior in the portal vein and Euro-Collins in the aorta.     

Influence of high donor serum sodium levels on early postoperative graft function in human liver transplantation: effect of correction of donor hypernatremia.

Donor hypernatremia was reported to cause postoperative graft dysfunction in human orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the effects of the correction of donor hypernatremia before organ procurement have not been confirmed. The aim of this study is to determine whether donor hypernatremia is associated with early graft dysfunction after OLT and to determine the effect of the correction of donor hypernatremia. One hundred eighty-one consecutive OLTs performed between May 1997 and July 1998 were entered onto this study. The cases were divided into three groups according to the donor serum sodium concentration: group A, serum sodium of 155 mEq/L or less before organ procurement (n = 118); group B, peak sodium greater than 155 mEq/L and final sodium 155 mEq/L or less (n = 36); and group C, final sodium greater than 155 mEq/L (n = 27). Graft survival within 90 days after OLT and early postoperative graft function were analyzed. There were no significant differences in donor and recipient variables among the three groups. The frequencies of graft loss were 15 of 118 grafts (12.7%) in group A, 4 of 36 grafts (11.1%) in group B, and 9 of 27 grafts (33.3%; P <.05 v groups A and B) in group C. The liver enzyme values in groups B and C were significantly greater than those in group A postoperatively. The prothrombin times of group C were significantly longer than those of group A for the first 4 postoperative days. Recipients of hepatic allografts from donors with uncorrected hypernatremia had a significantly greater incidence of graft loss compared with recipients of hepatic allografts from normonatremic donors. However, the differences in graft survival were abrogated by the correction of donor hypernatremia before procurement.     

Comparative evaluation of Celsior solution versus Viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model.

BACKGROUND: In a pig liver transplantation model, we compared the effects of Celsior solution (CS), an extracellular preservation solution, with Viaspan (University of Wisconsin solution, UW) on graft function and animal survival. METHODS: Pig livers were flushed with either CS or UW solution and cold-stored for 12 hr (group 1) or for 8 to 10 hr (group 2). Grafts were transplanted orthotopically. Intrahepatic reduced and oxidized glutathione and adenine nucleotides were evaluated 1 hr after reperfusion. Liver function of transplanted animals was monitored for up to 6 days by serum transaminases, total bilirubin, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, and prothrombin levels. RESULTS: In group 1, all animals died within 24 hr after reperfusion regardless of the preservation solution used. In group 2, no significant difference was seen in survival between the CS (72%) and the UW (67%) groups 6 days after transplantation, and there were no statistically significant differences in the biochemical data. There were no differences in histological evaluation of the livers at the time of death or killing of the animals between the CS and UW groups. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this pilot study, CS is equivalent to UW in terms of graft function and animal survival.     

University of Wisconsin solution versus Celsior solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the safety and efficacy of University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and Celsior solution (C) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A retrospective review of 154 PTx performed over a 61-month period included 77 grafts preserved with UW and 77 with C. The two groups were comparable for both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 624 minutes (range 360 to 945 minutes) for UW versus 672 minutes (range 415 to 1005 minutes) for C (P = NS), no primary endocrine nonfunction occurred. Delayed endocrine function was diagnosed in two grafts in the UW group (2.6%) versus none in the C group (P = NS). After a minimum follow-up of 4 months (mean 26.5 +/- 15.2 months), 22 recipients (UW = 11 vs C = 11; P = NS) required relaparotomy. Overall, 18 pancreata were lost due to either patient death with functioning graft (UW = 4 vs C = 1; P = NS) or graft loss due to other reasons (UW = 8 vs C = 5; P = NS). Actuarial 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 93.5% and 86.8% for UW compared with 98.7% and 98.7% for C (P = .04). Actuarial graft survival rates at the same times were 88.3% and 75.0% for UW compared with 90.4% and 90.4% for C (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and C show similar safety and efficacy profiles for PTx.     

Organ preservation with histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation: an update of the indiana university experience

In May 2003, University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced with Histidine-Tryptophan Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution as the preservation fluid for abdominal organ procurements in our center. Herein we have reported our updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation. Between May 2003 and October 2006, 152 pancreas transplantations were performed in which 146 used HTK. The procedures were as follows: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 85; 55%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 41; 30%), and solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 20; 15%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction (PNF), and 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival. Patient demographics are as follows: age (36 +/- 12 years), gender (males, 89: females, 57), race (white, 135; African American, 11). Mean flush volume was 3.8 +/- 1 L. The mean cold ischemia time was 8 +/- 3 hours. Mean warm ischemia time was 48 +/- 23 minutes. There were no cases of PNF in this cohort. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survival rates were 99% and 95%, respectively. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals rates were 95% and 93%, respectively. There were 10 grafts lost with 7 vascular complications (6 venous and 1 arterial thrombosis). There were 2 cases of chronic rejection and 1 graft lost to noncompliance. These statistics compare favorably with International Pancreas Transplant Registry reported 1-year survival for pancreas allografts. All other patients were insulin independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation to those of a historical UW cohort. Within this range of cold ischemia times, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

Follow-up experience using histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

In May 2003, at Indiana University, the standard cold preservation solution University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced by histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution. Earlier, we presented our initial experience with HTK in pancreas preservation with an analysis of the first 10 pancreas transplants. Here we report updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation over the past 18 months. Between May 2003 and March 2005, a total of 87 pancreas transplants were performed with 78 of these organs utilizing HTK. Seventy five patients received 78 organ transplants. Surgical procedures performed were: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 50, 64%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 19, 24%), solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 9, 12%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction and 30-day graft and patient survivals, and compared to the UW cohort from our original report. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Mean follow-up time is 12 +/- 6 months. The mean cold ischemia time was 9 +/- 3 hours. There were no cases of primary graft nonfunction. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survivals were 99% and 93%. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals were 96% and 93%. There were five grafts lost, including three within the first month (two venous and one arterial thrombosis). There was one case of chronic rejection and one noncompliance. All other patients were insulin-independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. Within this range of cold ischemia time, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

External Biliary Fistula in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

During orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), various situations may occur in which biliary reconstruction is neither technically feasible nor recommended. One bridge to a delayed anastomosis can be an external biliary fistula (EBF). This procedure allows the surgeon to execute hemostatic maneuvers, such as abdominal packing; therefore, biliary reconstruction can be subsequently performed in a bloodless operative field without edematous tissues. EBF can be made by placing in the donor biliary tract a cannula that is fixed to the bile duct using 2-0 silk ties and secured outside the abdominal wall. The biliary anastomosis will be performed within 2 days after the OLT. The aim of this study was to examine the safety of EBF in terms of the incidence of biliary complications compared with a direct anastomosis. Among 1634 adult OLTs performed in 17 years in our center, 1322 were carried out with termino-terminal hepaticocholedochostomy (HC-TT); two with side-to-side hepaticocholedochostomy; 208 with hepaticojejunostomy (HJ); 31 with EBF and delayed HC-TT, and 71 with EBF and delayed HJ. Biliary complication rates in the EBF group were 24.5%, including 23.9% in the delayed HJ and 25.8% in the delayed HC-TT. Biliary complication incidence among all OLTs was 24.6% (P = NS). No complications related to the procedure were observed. Therefore, EBF is a safe technique without a higher biliary complication rate. It may be useful when a direct biliary anastomosis is dangerous.     

The impact of extended preservation on clinical liver transplantation

The introduction of UW solution into clinical transplantation has permitted extended cold storage preservation of the liver. Over a 46-month period, we have performed 308 orthotopic liver transplants (266 primary, 42 retransplants) in 266 recipients. Our experience is divided into cold-storage preservation in Eurocollins (163 transplants in 140 recipients) and UW (145 transplants in 131 recipients) solutions. Donor and recipient factors were comparable between the two groups. The use of UW solution has permitted an increase in the mean preservation time from 5.2 +/- 1.0 [EC] to 12.8 +/- 4.3 [UW] hr (P less than 0.001). The mean total operating time was reduced but intraoperative blood loss was unchanged with UW preservation. The number of transplants performed during the daytime hours has increased dramatically (21.5% [EC] vs. 71% [UW], P less than 0.001). The incidence of primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, 1-month graft survival, and early retransplantation were similar in the 2 groups. Initial allograft function as determined by bile production, histology, and clinical assessment were likewise similar. Mean serum bilirubin, transaminase, and prothrombin levels were virtually identical by 5 days posttransplant. The enhanced margin of safety afforded by extended preservation has increased the capability for distant organ procurement and sharing, minimized organ wastage, and improved the efficiency of organ retrieval. With the relaxation of logistical constraints, our rate of liver import has nearly doubled (20.9% [EC] vs. 39.3% [UW], P less than 0.001). Extended preservation has permitted the development of reduced-size liver grafting (n = 12), resulting in a significant reduction in the number of deaths occurring while awaiting transplantation. Therefore, we advocate the use of UW solution with selective extension of preservation based not only on donor and recipient factors but also on manpower, resource, and logistical considerations.     

A comparison of cold storage solutions for pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation

BACKGROUND: Several solutions are used to preserve the pancreas prior to islet isolation. This study sought to assess whether the type of solution had an impact on the isolation outcome. METHODS: We reviewed data from 125 islet isolation procedures performed from January 2002 to January 2005. Pancreata were preserved in University of Wisconsin (UW) (n = 101), Celsior (CS) (n = 19), or IGL-1 (n = 5) solutions. Islet isolation results and transplantation rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: UW, CS, and IGL-1 groups were similar according to donor's age, weight, and body mass index. Weight of undigested pancreas was 20 +/- 13.1, 21.4 +/- 15.7, and 17.4 +/- 8.7 g for UW, CS, and IGL-1, respectively (P > .2). Final total number of IEQ was 267,000 +/- 132,000, 277,000 +/- 155,000, and 311,000 +/- 163,000, respectively (P > .4). Success rate (defined as >250,000 IEQ) was 55.5%, 52.9%, and 60% for UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 (P > .9); the transplantation rate was 42.2% for UW, 36.8% for Celsior, and 80% for IGL-1 preservation (P > .2). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 solutions demonstrated similar islet isolation results. The new IGL-1 solution appears promising.