Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: does age alone influence outcomes?

HYPOTHESIS: Outcome differences in octogenarians vs patients younger than 80 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery can be analyzed to isolate the effect of age alone on morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Eight-year hospitalization cohort study. Physicians, nurses, and perfusionists prospectively collected data on 225 variables. SETTING: Community hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 7726 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery between October 1, 1993, and February 28, 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: There were 9 main outcomes of interest: mortality, length of hospital stay, gastrointestinal tract complications, neurologic complications, pulmonary complications, renal complications, return to intensive care unit, intraoperative complications, and reoperation to treat bleeding. We controlled for 16 potential confounding variables to isolate outcome differences according to age. RESULTS: Of 7726 patients who fit the inclusion criteria, 522 were octogenarians. Compared with nonoctogenarians, octogenarians had a significantly higher New York Heart Association functional classification, higher incidence of hypertension, and underwent a greater number of coronary artery bypass grafting plus valve surgical procedures (P<.05). They also had significantly lower body surface area, fewer total number of grafts used, less history of tobacco use, and less abnormal left ventricular hypertrophy, and there were fewer nonwhite patients and fewer men. At multivariate analysis, octogenarians had a higher risk for death (relative risk [RR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.83), longer hospital stay (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04), more neurologic complications (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.26-1.67), and were more likely to undergo a reoperation to treat bleeding (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-1.72). Univariate analyses revealed no difference between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians for diabetes mellitus, urgency of procedure, prior myocardial infarction, time since last myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pump time. CONCLUSIONS: Age alone has been shown to influence outcomes after cardiac bypass or valve surgery. Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery have more comorbidities and higher mortality even after controlling for 16 potential confounding variables, compared with nonoctogenarians.     

Carotid surgery in octogenarians: why not?

The latest studies have clearly demonstrated the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy. However, most of these studies excluded patients over the age of 80. Some authors question the efficacy of and indication for endarterectomy in octogenarians. We therefore compared our results for endarterectomies on patients aged under and over 80. The author reviewed 475 carotid endarterectomies that he himself performed between July 1, 1990 and February 28, 2001; 72 of these procedures were carried out on 65 patients (15%) aged 80 and over. Both perioperative neurological events and mortality were studied. The outcome of carotid endarterectomy in both patient population groups was comparable; more than 70% of octogenarians were still alive 4 years later the same indications for carotid endarterectomy should therefore be applied to octogenarians.     

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Does increased age indicate “high risk?”

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is proven to be the most effective treatment for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of 50% or greater and asymptomatic carotid stenosis of 60% or greater. Although the prevalence of carotid artery disease increases with age, most prospective and randomized trials have excluded patients older than 80 years, implying that they are either at higher procedural risk or have decreased life expectancy. Since advanced age (>/=80 years) has been viewed as a "high-risk" indicator for CEA, age >/=80 years has been used as an indication for alternative treatment. The study was conducted to determine if age >/=80 years is related to increased morbidity, mortality, and length of stay in patients undergoing CEA. METHODS: In the 12-year period from 1993 to 2004, 2217 CEAs were performed in 1961 patients. Three hundred sixty procedures were performed in 334 patients >/=80 years. Demographics, presentation, risk factors, operative outcome, and survival were analyzed. Contemporary literature was reviewed and the results summarized. RESULTS: In patients aged >/=80 years, compared with their younger cohort, there was no difference in stroke (1.1% vs 0.8%, P = .333) but there was a higher operative mortality (1.9% vs 0.8%, P = .053). The combined stroke/death rate was higher in octogenarians (3.1% vs 1.5%, P = .041). This difference was due to the greater stroke/death rate in symptomatic octogenarians vs asymptomatic octogenarians (6.0% vs 0.9%, P = .007). The average postoperative length of stay was 3.2 +/- 4.8 days for octogenarians compared with 2.4 +/- 3.5 days for their younger counterparts ( P < .001). Thirty-seven percent of the octogenarians were discharged on the first postoperative day vs 51% ( P < .001), whereas 13% remained hospitalized beyond 5 days vs 8% ( P = .003). Although Kaplan-Meier survival curves show a higher mortality in octogenarians, survival after CEA approaches that of the overall population. A summary of the contemporary literature of CEA in 2204 patients >/=80 shows an operative stroke rate of 2.23% and death rate of 1.28%, with a combined stroke/death rate of 3.51%. CONCLUSION: CEA is a safe and effective procedure in the octogenarian. The combined stroke/death rate is increased in patients aged >/=80, indicating increased risk, predominantly in symptomatic patients. Although CEA risk in octogenarians is higher compared with a younger cohort, outcomes remain within acceptable national guidelines and within outcome measures known to confer benefit compared with best medical care. Therefore, the term "high risk" should not be arbitrarily applied to patients reaching the 80-year threshold. This is confirmed by the contemporary literature.     

How safe is open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery for octogenarians in New Zealand?

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an important cause of mortality for the aged, a group that has been denied surgery in the past for fear of peri‐operative mortality. Is this attitude still justified? Methods: Analysis of prospectively gathered data from a vascular database. Results: 10.9% of all open AAA operations were in patients older than 79 years with an 8% mortality cate compared to 3% for younger patients. For fit elderly patients with ASA scores less than 3, mortality was just under 4%. Renal failure and wound dehiscence were more common in the elderly. Conclusion: When endovascular repair is not possible in a fit elderly patient, open surgery can be performed with acceptable results.     

Major abdominal surgery and postoperative pain control: are protocols enough?

Suitable postoperative pain control (POPC) requires both the application of appropriate pain therapy and the continuous supervision of its therapeutic effects. In our hospital, POPC was, until recently, limited to the first 48 postoperative hours. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess, the evolution of POPC at the end of the first postoperative 48 hours among major abdominal surgery patients using the Acute Pain Service (APS) database. Further we sought to establish the indications to extend POPC to the entire postoperative period. Regardless of the type of protocol applied after surgery, 79.6% of cases showed pain control was still needed after the 48(th) hour. In about half of the cases, POPC was perpetuated with only the drug category or by dosage modifications, while in roughly one third of the cases we adopted both drug and administration route changes. These changes were made by the APS after a thorough evaluation of the patients' conditions and needs in terms of analgesia. Interestingly, in approximately 5% of cases the surgeon decided to interrupt pain therapy. When applying evidence-based guideline protocols, organizational issues are important as well as a better definition of the APS role in POPC, at least from the timing point of view.     

Does previous abdominal surgery affect the course and outcomes of laparoscopic bariatric surgery?

Background

Global experiences in general surgery suggest that previous abdominal surgery may negatively influence different aspects of perioperative care. As the incidence of bariatric procedures has recently increased, it is essential to assess such correlations in bariatric surgery.

Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: can elderly patients benefit? Quality of life after cardiac surgery

Background. Increasing numbers of the very old are presenting for cardiac surgical procedures. There is little information about quality of life after hospital discharge in this group.

Methods. From March 1995 to February 1997, 127 patients older than 80 years at operation (mean age, 83 ± 2.5 years; range, 80 to 92 years) were entered into the cardiac surgery database and analyzed retrospectively. The RAND SF-36 Health Survey and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire were used to assess quality of life by telephone interview (mean follow-up, 15.7 ± 6.9 months). No patient was lost to follow-up.

Results. Operations included coronary artery bypass grafting (65.4%), coronary artery bypass grafting plus valve replacement (15.8%), and isolated valve replacement (14.2%). Preoperatively, 63.8% were in New York Heart Association class IV. Thirty-day mortality was 7.9%, and actuarial survival was 83% (70% confidence interval, 79% to 87%) at 1 year and 80% (70% confidence interval, 75% to 85%) at 2 years. Preoperative renal failure significantly increased the risk of early death (relative risk, 3.96) as did urgent or emergent operation (relative risk, 6.70). In addition, cerebrovascular disease (relative risk, 3.54) and prolonged ventilation (relative risk, 3.82) were risk factors for late death. Ninety-five patients (92.2%) were in New York Heart Association class I or II at follow-up. Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores for anginal frequency (92.3 ± 18.9), stability (94.4 ± 16.5), and exertional capacity (86.8 ± 25.1) indicated good relief of symptoms. SF-36 scores were equal to or better than those for the general population of age greater than 65 years. Of the survivors, 83.7% were living in their own home, 74.8% rated their health as good or excellent, and 82.5% would undergo operation again in retrospect.

Conclusion. Octogenarians can undergo cardiac surgical procedures at a reasonable risk and show remarkable improvement in their symptoms. Elderly patients benefit from improved functional status and quality of life.     

Prolapse surgery in octogenarians: are we pushing the limits too far?

Purpose

To report our experience with pelvic reconstructive surgery with transobturator mesh implants in elderly women.

Materials and methods

A total of 32 women aged >75 years with pelvic organ prolapse receiving anterior and/or posterior repair using transobturator mesh implants were included. Concomitant mid-urethral sling procedure was performed in 78 % women. Postoperative outcome data and quality-of-life measurements were recorded prospectively. Patients were followed for up to 24 months.

Results

Mean age at surgery was 82.8 ± 3.1 years. A total of 15 anterior repairs, 8 posterior repairs, and 9 posterior and anterior repairs were performed using transobturator mesh implants. Concomitant synthetic mid-urethral transobturator sling procedure was performed in 25 women (78 %). Mean operating time was 47.2 ± 22.3 min, and the mean hospitalization period was 5.9 ± 1.6 days. There were no systemic complications related to anesthesia or surgery. Two patients required intraoperative bladder suturing due to iatrogenic bladder lesion. There were no rectal injuries, no bleeding necessitating transfusion, voiding dysfunction, or erosions of synthetic implants. Pelvic floor testing at 24 months postoperatively showed 15 % of the patients presenting with stage II vaginal wall prolapse. Further, quality-of-life parameters, as measured by SF-36 questionnaire, were improved compared to baseline values.

Conclusions

Pelvic reconstructive surgery in elderly women is safe and enhances the quality of life. However, special caution should be paid to risks and benefits of such surgery in this patient population.     

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: does age at the time of surgery affect outcome?

HYPOTHESIS: Functional outcome and quality of life in older patients (>55 years) undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis have been incompletely studied. Our aim was to update our understanding on how the age of the patient at the time of surgery influences functional outcome and quality of life after IPAA. METHODS: From January 1, 1981, to December 31, 2000, two thousand two patients who underwent IPAA were studied. Patients were grouped by age at operation: 45 years or younger (n = 1688), between 46 and 55 years (n = 249), and older than 55 years (n = 65). Mean age was 33.5 years. Postoperative complications, function, and quality of life were assessed with a questionnaire administered annually. RESULTS: Follow-up for patients older than 55 years was a mean +/- SD of 8.1 +/- 4.8 years. Overall, follow-up was a mean of 10.1 +/- 5.7 years. The pouch failure rate for patients older than 55 years was 1.6% at 10 years. No statistically significant difference in pouch failure between age groups was observed. Overall, frequent daytime and nighttime incontinence, respectively, occurred in 5.6% and 13.3% of the patients at 10 years. Incontinence was more common in older patients (P = .002 at 3 years). Quality of life as assessed by social activities, work, travel, sexual activity, family relationships, and sports and recreation was not significantly different among age groups. Most patients felt that their condition had improved or that they had no restrictions after IPAA. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications after surgery seem to be unrelated to age at the time of surgery. Although incontinence may occur more frequently in older patients, IPAA does not adversely affect quality of life in patients older than 55 years.     

Is aortic surgery using hypothermic circulatory arrest in octogenarians justifiable?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to analyze the risk of mortality and neurological complications after aortic surgery requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) in octogenarians. METHODS: All patients of >80 years at the time of aortic surgery requiring HCA since 1988 were examined. Of 51 patients, 23 were male; the median age was 83. Twenty-six (51%) had proximal repair; the arch was replaced in eight (16%), and 17 (33%) had descending aorta repair. Eleven (22%) were emergencies. Multivariate analysis was carried out to determine the risk factors for in-hospital mortality and/or stroke (adverse outcome) using variables with P<0.1 after univariate analysis. RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 16%. Five patients suffered strokes (9.8%): only one survived >6 months, and three died before discharge. The overall adverse outcome was 22%, but elective operation was associated with much better results, with an adverse outcome of only 3.6% after operations via a median sternotomy. Adverse outcome was strikingly higher with more distal resections via a left thoracotomy: 47 vs. 8.8% for ascending aorta/arch resections (P=0.003). Emergency operation via a lateral thoracotomy was associated with a prohibitively high adverse outcome. Twenty-nine patients (73%) had temporary neurological dysfunction (TND). Multivariate analysis revealed emergency operation (P=0.01; odds ratio (OR), 10.6) and operations via a lateral thoracotomy (P=0.008; OR, 11) as independent preoperative predictors of adverse outcome. The overall survival was 66% at 2 years and 39% at 5 years, compared with 85 and 52% among age- and sex-matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic surgery utilizing HCA in octogenarians can be performed with an acceptable risk of mortality and stroke. From the evidence in this study, it seems that elective aneurysm repair via a median sternotomy can be undertaken for the usual indications, even in octogenarians. However, the enhanced vulnerability of the brain in the elderly is reflected by a high early mortality following stroke, and a high incidence of TND. Emergency operations increase the possibility of adverse outcome dramatically, and patients who require a lateral thoracotomy are at significantly higher risk than those operated via a median sternotomy.