Empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected infection in granulocytopenic cancer patients: a comparison between the combination of moxalactam plus amikacin and ticarcillin plus amikacin

Moxalactam is a new cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity which includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa in addition to Klebsiella species Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. Moxalactam was combined with amikacin (M + A) compared to ticarcillin plus amikacin (T + A) in a prospective, randomized double-blind trial of empiric therapy for febrile episodes among granulocytopenic cancer patients. One hundred and ninety-one epidoses were evaluated; T + A, 93 episodes and M + A, 98 episodes. Median granulocyte count of initiation of therapy was less than 100/microliters. Overall response rates were good. In the T + A group, 21 of 29 (72 percent) microbiologically documented infections, including seven of 14 (50 percent) bacteremias, and 24 of 27 (89 percent) clinically documented infections improved. In the M + A group, 20 of 28 (71 percent) microbiologically documented infections, including 11 of 18 (61 percent) bacteremias, and 25 of 25 (96 percent) clinically documented infections resolved. Adverse effects were minimal and equivalent in both groups. Hypokalemia (decrease in serum potassium of greater than 11 mEq/liter from baseline) occurred in 14 of the 93 episodes in the T + A group and in 10 of the 98 episodes in the M + A group with decline in mean serum potassium level of 0.5 and 0.4 mEq/liter respectively. Nephrotoxicity (increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.04 mg/dl) occurred in only one patient in the T + A group and in two patients in the M + A group. Moxalactam plus amikacin has a broader in vitro spectrum, is as effective, and is no more toxic than ticarcillin plus amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.     

Randomized trial of empiric antibiotic therapy with ticarcillin in combination with gentamicin, amikacin or netilmicin in febrile patients with granulocytopenia and cancer.

A randomized trial of ticarcillin plus gentamicin (group 1), ticarcillin plus amikacin (group 2) and ticarcillin plus netilmicin (group 3) as empiric antibiotic therapy in patients with granulocytopenia and cancer was carried out at the Baltimore Cancer Research Center. The response rate for all infections was 97 per cent in group 1, 91 per cent in group 2 and 95 per cent in group 3. Patients with bacteremias showed improvement in 93 per cent (group 1), 78 per cent (group 2) and 82 per cent (group 3) of cases. All failures were among patients with gram-negative bacteremias. Both antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteremic organism and granulocyte recovery correlated with patient improvement. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were rare and were not significantly different in three groups of patients. Therefore, ticarcillin plus gentamicin, ticarcillin plus amikacin and ticarcillin plus netilmicin appear to be equally efficacious and minimally toxic in this patient population. Excellent over-all results can be expected with these combinations provided the etiologic agent is susceptible.     

Moxalactam plus piperacillin versus moxalactam plus amikacin in febrile granulocytopenic patients

In a prospective randomized trial, febrile granulocytopenic patients received either moxalactam plus piperacillin or moxalactam plus amikacin as initial empiric antimicrobial therapy. Most patients were also given prophylactic vitamin K. The overall response rates for the two regimens were similar (105 of 136, or 77 percent, for moxalactam plus piperacillin versus 107 of 136, or 79 percent, for moxalactam plus amikacin). For Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, the response rate was better in patients receiving moxalactam plus amikacin (seven of nine versus one of five, p = 0.06); two patients treated with moxalactam plus piperacillin experienced relapse of P. aeruginosa bacteremia in association with the emergence of beta-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. On the other hand, bacteremic enterococcal superinfections occurred in seven patients receiving moxalactam plus amikacin but in none given moxalactam plus piperacillin (p = 0.02). Serious side-effects were minimal with both regimens, and nephrotoxicity was less common in patients receiving moxalactam plus piperacillin (two of 136 versus six of 136, p = 0.28). There was no antibiotic-related hemorrhage. These results suggest that the overall efficacy and toxicity of moxalactam plus piperacillin and moxalactam plus amikacin are similar. Moxalactam/piperacillin therapy may be limited in certain patients by the emergence of beta-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa, whereas enterococcal superinfections may complicate moxalactam/amikacin therapy.     

Empiric antibiotic and antifungal therapy for cancer patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia

Since early diagnosis of even a disseminated fungal infection is difficult and treatment often ineffective in a patient with persistent granulocytopenia, we have prospectively evaluated continued antibiotic therapy and early empiric antifungal therapy in patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia. Between November 1975 and December 1979, all patients with fever (oral temperature >38 °C three times per 24 hours or >38.5 °C once) plus granulocytopenia (polymorphonuclear leukocytes < 500/mm³), were evaluated and began an empiric antibiotic regimen consisting of Keflin^®, gentamicin and carbenicillin (KGC). Of the 652 episodes of fever and granulocytopenia (in 271 patients), initial evaluation failed to define an infectious etiology in 323 (49.5 percent). In 50 of the patients in whom initial evaluation did not demonstrate an infectious etiology, fever and granulocytopenia continued after seven days of therapy with KGC, without evidence for the etiology of their persistent fever. These patients were randomized to either discontinue receiving KGC (Group 1); continue receiving KGC (Group 2); continue receiving KGC with the addition of empiric amphotericin B (Group 3). The duration of granulocytopenia was comparable in the three groups (median 24 days, range 8 to 51 days). Clinically or microbiologically demonstrable infections occurred in nine of 16 patients who discontinued the KGC regimen (Group 1) (six also experienced shock, p < 0.01) compared with six of 16 patients who continued the KGC regimen (Group 2) (five in whom fungal infection developed), and in two of 18 patients who continued the KGC regimen plus amphotericin B (Group 3). The incidence of infections was less for patients receiving KGC plus amphotericin B than for patients who discontinued the KGC regimen (p = 0.013).Empiric amphotericin B therapy was also evaluated for its effectiveness in patients whose initial evaluation revealed an infectious etiology with fungal colonization throughout their alimentary tract but in whom fever and granulocytopenia remained despite at least seven days of therapy with appropriate antibiotics. In addition, the postmortem records of all patients dying between 1970 and 1979 were reviewed to ascertain the cause of death and the type of antimicrobial therapy received prior to death. Only one death due to fungal invasion occurred, when therapy with amphotericin B was instituted after one week of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.Collectively, these data suggest that continuing antibiotic therapy reduces early bacterial infections in patients with persistent fever and granulocytopenia and that empiric antifungal therapy also appears necessary to prevent fungal superinfections and to control clinically undetected fungal invasion.     

Aztreonam therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer

Combinations of aztreonam/vancomycin, aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin, and moxalactam/ticarcillin were compared in a prospective randomized trial as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Vancomycin was added to aztreonam to provide coverage against gram-positive organisms. Of 535 febrile episodes included in the study, 455 were evaluable. The aztreonam/vancomycin and aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin combinations were both more effective than the moxalactam/ticarcillin combination in a total of 244 episodes of documented infection. The difference was due to the fact that both aztreonam-containing combinations were more effective than the moxalactam/ticarcillin combination in documented gram-positive infections. The three regimens were equally effective in 67 documented infections due to a single gram-negative bacterial species. (The response rates were 87, 86 and 94 percent for the aztreonam/vancomycin, aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin, and moxalactam/ticarcillin combinations, respectively.) Aztreonam was effective as the single active antibiotic in the treatment of gram-negative infections in neutropenic patients; however, it must be used in combination with another antibiotic to provide gram-positive coverage.     

Empiric therapy for infections in patients with granulocytopenia. Continuous v interrupted infusion of tobramycin plus cefamandole

A combination of tobramycin sulfate and cefamandole nafate was used as initial empiric therapy for the treatment of 71 evaluable febrile (temperature greater than 38.5 degrees C) episodes in 64 (neutrophils, less than 1,000/microL) adult patients with cancer and granulocytopenia. Carbenicillin sodium or ticarcillin disodium was substituted for cefamandole in patients with Pseudomonas infections and in patients in whom the initial regimen was unsuccessful. Twenty-nine episodes were randomized to receive tobramycin by continuous infusion, while 42 were randomized to receive tobramycin by interrupted infusion. Twenty-seven (79%) of the 34 documented infections responded to the initial empiric antibiotic combination, ten (83%) of 12 being given continuous infusion and 17 (77%) of 22 being given interrupted infusion of tobramycin. Nephrotoxic reaction occurred in 7% of patients treated with continuous infusion and 15% treated with interrupted infusion, mostly patients older than 60 years. Tobramycin, by either continuous or interrupted infusion, plus cefamandole is safe and efficacious empiric therapy for infections in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia.     

Can antibacterial therapy be discontinued in persistently febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients?

It has been suggested that empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics, instituted for fever in the presence of granulocytopenia, should continue to be administered, even when infection is not demonstrable, to those patients who remain persistently febrile and granulocytopenic. Therefore, the consequences of discontinuing antibiotics when the presence of infection is doubted in this setting were evaluated. In 16 (3.7 percent) of 429 episodes of fever and granulocytopenia for which empiric antibiotic therapy was instituted, after approximately four days, persistence of both fever and granulocytopenia was found, and yet infection was prospectively classified at that time as "doubtful." The initial empiric antibiotic regimen was therefore discontinued after a mean of 4.8 (median 5.0) days. Discontinuation of antibiotics proved appropriate for half of the patients; eight patients received no systemic therapeutic antibiotics with no evidence of infection during a period of at least two weeks. The other eight patients had antibacterial antibiotics reinstituted within a mean of 2.4 days; six infections were subsequently demonstrable. Six of these eight patients also required or were believed to require antifungal therapy with intravenous amphotericin B for presumed fungal infections. Patients with relapsed leukemia or lymphoma and those with a likelihood of continued profound granulocytopenia (counts below 100/microliters) or both were the ones who tended to require reinstitution of antibiotics. Discontinuation of antibiotics when infection was considered doubtful despite persistence of both fever and granulocytopenia was, therefore, successful in eight of 16 patients. Reinstitution of antibiotics was required in the eight remaining patients. No definite rule appears to be applicable to all patients.     

Empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Randomized prospective comparison of amikacin plus piperacillin with or without parenteral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole

Summary In a prospective randomized trial parenteral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole was added to amikacin plus piperacillin in order to compare triple-drug antibiotic combination with a standard regimen as empiric therapy of fever in patients with granulocytopenia. One hundred and sixty-one episodes were evaluated; 74 episodes with amikacin plus piperacillin and 87 episodes with amikacin plus piperacillin plus trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole. The overall response to therapy (63% vs. 84%) as well as the response of microbiologically documented infections (60% vs. 82%) was significantly better in patients treated with the triple-drug combination (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences in response to antibiotics at different infection sites or with regard to any single pathogen was found between the two groups. Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole seemed to be responsible for additional toxicity (nausea and vomiting) when added to amikacin plus piperacillin, but these side-effects were clearly related to the rate of infusion of trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole. The findings of this study support the use of a three-drug versus a two-drug combination as empiric antibiotic regimen in febrile granulocytopenic patients.

---

Empirische antimikrobielle Therapie bei granulozytopenischen Patienten mit Fieber. Randomisierte, prospektive Vergleichsstudie zur Therapie mit Amikacin plus Piperacillin mit oder ohne Zusatz von parenteralem Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazol

Zusammenfassung In einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie wurde die Kombination Amikacin plus Piperacillin plus Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazol mit der Standard-Zweierkombination Amikacin-Piperacillin in der empirischen Behandlung von Fieberschüben bei granulozytopenischen Patienten verglichen. 161 Fieberepisoden wurden ausgewertet, davon waren 74 mit Amikacin plus Piperacillin und 87 mit Amikacin plus Piperacillin plus Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazol behandelt worden. Bei Patienten, die die Antibiotika-Dreierkombination erhalten hatten, war der Gesamt-Therapieerfolg wie auch das Ansprechen mikrobiologisch nachgewiesener Infektionen mit 84% bzw. 82% signifikant besser als bei Patienten, die nur Amikacin-Piperacillin erhalten hatten, mit Ansprechraten von 63% bzw. 60% (p < 0,05). Bei Auswertung der Ansprechraten nach Infektionslokalisation oder Erregern fanden sich hingegen keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Gruppen. Die Zugabe von Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazol zu Amikacin-Piperacillin verstärkte offensichtlich die Toxizität der Antibiotikatherapie mit vermehrtem Auftreten von Übelkeit und Erbrechen, doch standen diese Nebenwirkungen eindeutig in Beziehung zur Infusionsgeschwindigkeit von Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazol. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie sprechen für die Verwendung einer Kombination von drei Antibiotika anstelle einer Zweierkombination in der empirischen Therapie von Fieberschüben bei granulozytopenischen Patienten.

     

Piperacillin plus amikacin therapy v carbenicillin plus amikacin therapy in febrile, granulocytopenic patients

In a prospective randomized trial, febrile, granulocytopenic patients received either piperacillin sodium plus amikacin sulfate or carbenicillin disodium plus amikacin as initial empiric antimicrobial therapy. Although significantly more gram-negative aerobic bacilli isolated from initial cultures were susceptible to piperacillin than to carbenicillin (54 of 58 v 30 of 58), the overall response rates for the two regimens were similar (113 of 143 or 79% for piperacillin plus amikacin and 116 of 154 or 75% for carbenicillin plus amikacin). Piperacillin plus amikacin was associated with less hypokalemia (26 of 143 v 56 of 154). Nephrotoxicity, which was minimal with both regimens, developed less frequently in patients receiving carbenicillin plus amikacin (12 of 143 v two of 154). These results suggest that the overall efficacy of piperacillin plus amikacin is similar to carbenicillin plus amikacin and that piperacillin plus amikacin may be associated with less hypokalemia but more nephrotoxicity.     

Empiric therapy with aztreonam for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies

Combination of aztreonam/amikacin/ticarcillin (AAT) and latamoxef/amikacin/ticarcillin (LAT) were compared in a prospective randomized trial of empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Low dose amphotericin B was also added to each regimen from the beginning. Of 45 evaluable episodes, 23 were treated with AAT and 22 with LAT. The response rates were 61 percent for AAT and 50 percent for LAT, statistically not significant. There was one infection-related death among patients assigned to AAT therapy and also one among those assigned to LAT therapy. Dose escalation of amphotericin B seemed to be effective for those patients who did not improve with initial therapy.     

A multicenter comparative trial of tobramycin and ticarcillin vs moxalactam and ticarcillin in febrile neutropenic patients

During a multicenter prospective randomized trial in febrile neutropenic patients (neutrophil count, less than 1,000/cu mm), 103 episodes were treated with tobramycin sulfate plus ticarcillin disodium (TT) while 117 were treated with moxalactam plus ticarcillin disodium (MT). The majority of patients had an underlying diagnosis of leukemia (60%) and most (62.8%) had granulocyte counts of less than 100/cu mm at the start of therapy. The response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 38 of 60 (55.1%) for TT and 38 of 64 (59.4%) for MT. The MT regimen appeared to be more effective for gram-positive infections (56% vs 33%) while TT appeared more effective for gram-negative infections (64% vs 40%). Nephrotoxicity attributable to study drugs occurred in only 2.3% of cases (one on each treatment arm). Prolongation of the prothrombin time was observed in only six of 78 (7.7%) in the TT arm as compared with 39 of 103 (38%) in the MT arm. Neither regimen was adequate for the unusually high frequency of gram-positive pathogens seen during this study.     

Ceftazidime and amikacin as empiric treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients in Saudi Arabia.

Sixty-four consecutive febrile episodes in 50 consecutive patients with malignancy and neutropenia were empirically treated with a combination of ceftazidime and amikacin. Of 52 analysable episodes, the response rate was 59.6% overall and 26.3% of episodes with microbiologically documented infections with septicaemia. Infection-related death occurred in 10 patients (19.2% of episodes). The response rates were similar in patients with acute leukaemia or other malignancies. Poor response is attributed to increased frequency of infections with Gram-positive and fungal organisms. A modified empiric regimen including cover for Gram-positive and fungal organisms is suggested in similar patient populations.     

肿瘤患者粒细胞缺乏症并感染的经验性抗生素治疗回顾性分析

目的　总结肿瘤患者粒细胞缺乏症并感染的经验性抗生素治疗的临床经验。方法　回顾性分析 119例肿瘤患者 2 4 8例次的临床资料 ,观察头孢哌酮 (CFP)、氧哌嗪青霉素 (PPC)、头孢他定 (CTZ)、亚胺培南 (IMP)与丁胺卡那霉素 (AMK)分别组成BA、PA、CA、TA方案的疗效及副作用。结果　BA、PA、CA、TA方案分别治疗 10 3、87、35和 2 3例次 ,治疗的中位时间为 7～ 8d ,有效率分别为 6 3%、4 8%、6 8%和 74 % ,PA方案明显为低 (P <0 0 5 )。治疗无效者调整治疗 :改用CA或TA方案加减去甲万古霉素 (NVC)及抗真菌治疗 ;总有效率分别为 88%、83%、86 %和 91%。最常见副作用为胃肠功能紊乱 ,腹泻为 12 % ,皮疹和肝转氨酶轻度升高分别为 4 % ;2例NVC和AMK治疗者出现明显的听力下降和肾脏毒性。结论　BA、CA、TA方案具有相似的疗效 ,可作为一线经验性治疗方案。经验性治疗无效者 ,应改用具有更高抗菌活性的方案或尽早采用NCV和 (或 )抗霉菌治疗     

Ceftazidime plus teicoplanin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in cancer patients with granulocytopenia

S ummary In a prospective randomized study, 100 episodes of fever (>38°C) and granulocytopenia (<1000/μ1) in cancer patients were empirically treated with ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) plus teicoplanin (400 mg every 8 h on day 1: 400 mg every day thereafter) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) plus amikacin (500 mg every 8 h).
Bacteraemia. clinically documented infection and possible infection were documented in seven. 11 and 19 patients treated with ceftazidime plus teicoplanin and in 11, four and 17 patients treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin. Overall, the response rate was similar in the two groups of patients as was the need for treatment modifications and the rate of death.
For documented Gram-positive bacteraemia, the response rate was 2/5 patients treated with ceftazidime plus teicoplanin and 2/7 with ceftazidime plus amikacin: for documented Gram-negative bacteraemia. the response rate was 1/2 and 3/4 patients respectively. No breakthrough bacteraemia was observed. Tolerance was excellent. although renal toxicity (elevation of serum creatinine) was observed in three patients treated with ceftazidime plus teicoplanin and in none allocated to ceftazidime plus amikacin.     

Duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in granulocytopenic patients with cancer.

Early initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy in febrile cancer patients has become established practice, but the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy when no infectious source can be identified is unknown. The complications of broad-spectrum antibiotics argue for brief treatment, but the risk of an inadequately treated infection in the granulocytopenic patient favors longer therapy. We prospectively studied 306 episodes of fever and granulocytopenia in 143 patients with leukemia or solid tumor (age one to 33 years) with respect to the duration of empiric antibiotic treatment. Eligible patients (fever > 38 °C three times/24 hours or > 38.5 °C once, plus polymorphonuclear leukocytes < 500/mm³) had an extensive diagnostic evaluation, including at least two preantibiotic blood cultures, and therapy was then started with a broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen— Keflin^®, gentamicin and carbenicillin (KGC). Initial evaluation failed to identify an infectious etiology for the fever in 142 of 306 (46 per cent) episodes. Fifty-six of 142 (39 per cent) of these fevers of unknown origin were associated with persistent granulocytopenia for more than seven days; in 33 of these, defervescence occurred while the patients received KGC. After seven days of empiric KGC therapy, the 33 patients with fevers of unknown origin who had become afebrile with empiric antibiotics but whose polymorphonuclear leukocytes remained less than 500/mm³ were randomized to either continue or discontinue ($\text{d}\text{c}$) to receive KGC. The patients who continued to receive KGC until their polymorphonuclear leukocytes were more than 500/mm³ had no infectious sequelae. However, in seven of 17 (41 per cent) of the patients randomized to $\text{d}\text{c}$ KGC infectious sequelae developed (p = 0.007) within a median of two days of discontinuing KGC (two with fever which again responded to KGC therapy, and five with a documented infection [two ultimately fatal]). In none of the patients did a resistant microbial flora or superinfection develop. These data suggest that the patient with a fever of unknown origin who becomes afebrile during empiric antibiotic therapy may profit from continued therapy while granulocytopenia persists.     

Empiric use of vancomycin during prolonged treatment-induced granulocytopenia. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with acute leukemia

Because gram-positive infections cause morbidity following intensive antileukemic chemotherapy, the effects of vancomycin versus placebo were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 60 adult patients with acute leukemia and first infectious fever during prolonged (mean of 32 days) granulocytopenia. Gram-positive sepsis was associated with first fever in 17 (28 percent) of the 60 patients. None of 31 patients randomly assigned to receive vancomycin demonstrated gram-positive infection, whereas 16 of 22 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo subsequently had gram-positive infection (seven had sepsis, and nine had local infections; p less than 0.005). All patients with gram-positive infection were then given vancomycin, and all showed prompt clinical responses. The predominant gram-positive organism causing infection was beta-lactam-resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (19 of 44 isolates). Patients randomly assigned to receive vancomycin had more rapid resolution of first infectious fever and fewer total febrile days during the granulocytopenic course than did patients randomly assigned to receive placebo. Although vancomycin had no effect on the presence or absence of documented fungal infection, patients treated with vancomycin received empiric amphotericin B for recurrent or persistent fever later (mean of 14 days after initial antibiotic coverage was begun) than did patients receiving placebo (mean of 9.9 days; p less than 0.005), and thus received fewer total days of empiric amphotericin B therapy (mean of 16.3 days) than did patients given placebo (mean of 24.6 days; p less than 0.01). These data demonstrate that empiric use of vancomycin reduces the morbidity of gram-positive infections following intensive antileukemic therapy and decreases the need for empiric use of toxic amphotericin B.     

Infections in 92 splenectomized patients with Hodgkin's disease. A clinical review.

Infections that occurrred in 92 previously untreated patients with Hodgkin's disease were reviewed from the time of laprotomy and splenectomy. Pneumonias occurred in nine patients with urinary tract infections in twelve during the immediate postoperative period. Severe bacterial infections did not occur in any patients during initial radiation therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy (stages I through IIIA), initial intensive chemotherapy (stages IIIB and IV) or during remission. Severe infections occurred in eight profoundly granulocytopenic patients with recurrent Hodgkin's disease. Streptococcus (Diplococcus) pneumoniae and Hemophilus spp infections were distinctly uncommon during the remission period. Herpes zoster, however, was very common developing in 22 of 92 (24 per cent) patients. Predisposing factors to herpes zoster included sex (female more than male), therapy (radiation plus chemotherapy more than chemotherapy alone), and age (less than 30 years of age more often than 30 to 50 years of age). Severe infection was uncommon in these patients except in ascociation with specific predisposing factors such as the immediate postoperative state of prolonged granulocytopenia associated with recurrent Hodgkin's disease or its therapy. Splenectomy per se did not affect either the incidence or the severity of infection during this period of 12+ months of observations per patient.     

Amikacin plus piperacillin versus ceftazidime as initial therapy in granulocytopenic patients with presumed bacteremia

69 febrile granulocytopenic episodes without an initial focus of infection were assessed for empiric treatment either with high-dose amikacin plus piperacillin or ceftazidime. 90% of patients in each group survived the granulocytopenic episode; 15 (44 +/- 17%) episodes treated with the combination and 23 (66 +/- 16%) given ceftazidime responded without any modification of initial therapy and half defervesced within 72 h. Persistent fever was the most frequent reason for altering treatment which was done empirically in 90% of cases, but two-thirds of patients required further treatment modification. An infectious focus mainly involving the lung developed during granulocytopenia in 21 patients (30%), of which 17 occurred during antimicrobial therapy. Only 1 infection was shown to be due to bacteria, while 7 were due to fungi. Amikacin levels were similar to those expected following a normal dose (mean peak of 34.7 and mean trough of 12.6 mg/l). Therapy with the combination resulted in a higher serum creatinine (p less than 0.001) and a lower potassium level (p less than 0.001) in comparison with monotherapy. Potassium supplementation was required in 45 +/- 17% of patients given the combination compared with only 4 +/- 7% of those treated with ceftazidime. While both regimens appeared to be equally effective as initial therapy, the need for modification was high in both patient groups. Monotherapy being both simpler to administer and less toxic seems therefore to be the logical choice although the period of empiric therapy must be fully exploited in order to improve diagnosis and therefore antimicrobial management.     

A pilot study of piperacillin and ciprofloxacin as initial therapy for fever in severely neutropenic leukemia patients.

We studied the efficacy of piperacillin and ciprofloxacin as initial parenteral therapy in 41 adult patients with leukemia who developed 47 febrile episodes during severe neutropenia following chemotherapy. 40 patients (98%) survived their febrile episode(s), whereas 1 patient died of infection. When assessed at 72 h after initiation of treatment (early evaluation), 24/47 episodes (51%) had been successfully treated. These 24 favourable responses were seen in 15/24 (63%) microbiologically documented infections and 9/19 (47%) fever of unknown origin (FUO). At the resolution of fever (late evaluation) 46 episodes were evaluable, and 28 (61%) had responded successfully to piperacillin and ciprofloxacin. Successful treatment was most frequently observed in microbiologically defined infections, 18/23 (78%). Three of 5 (60%) Gram-positive, 11/12 (92%) Gram-negative and 1 of 2 mixed bacteremias were successfully treated. In contrast, only 10/19 (53%) FUO and none of 4 clinically defined infections had responded. Thus, this pilot study indicates that piperacillin and ciprofloxacin may be a safe and effective combination for the treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic leukemia patients, which merits further investigation in randomized trials.     

Improved prognosis for granulocytopenic patients with gram-negative bacteremia

The grave prognosis associated with gram-negative bacteremia occurring in granulocytopenic patients with cancer suggests that granulocyte transfusions are frequently indicated. We have evaluated 67 episodes of gram-negative bacteremia, studied in four consecutive antibiotic trials, in order to correlate prognostic determinants of recovery. These patients had a median absolute granulocyte count of 100/μl at the time of bacteremia. Empiric antibiotic regimens were begun at the first evidence of suspected infection. Granulocyte transfusions were employed only as clinically indicated by inadequate patient response to antibiotic therapy. Among the 29 patients who had an increase in their granulocyte count of ?100/μl over the subsequent 14 days, 27 (93 per cent) recovered whereas among 38 patients who had no appreciable increase in their granulocyte count, 21 (55 per cent) improved (p = 0.006). In this latter group of patients with no granulocyte recovery, the susceptibility of the pathogen(s) to the initial empiric antibiotic regimen was of major importance. None of four patients responded when the pathogen was resistant to both antibiotics initially utilized, six of 14 (44 per cent) patients responded when there was susceptibility to one antibiotic, and 15 of 20 (75 per cent) patients responded when there was susceptibility to both antibiotics (p < 0.025). We conclude that patients with gramnegative bacteremia and persistent granulocytopenia will often respond to antimicrobial therapy alone provided the initial choice of empiric antibiotics is appropriate and that their use is instituted promptly. Granulocyte transfusions need not be added unless clinical evaluation indicates inadequate response.