Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.

Images of a phantom obtained with computed radiography and standard screen-film imaging were compared to evaluate observer threshold perception performance with a modified contrast-detail technique. Optimum exposure necessary for performance with the imaging plate technique to match that with screen-film techniques was determined, as was comparative performance with variation in kilovoltages, plate type, spatial enhancement, and hard-copy interpolation method. It was found that computed radiography necessitates about 75%-100% more exposure than screen-film radiography to optimally match performance with Ortho-C film with Lanex regular or medium screens (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for detection of objects 0.05-2.0 cm in diameter. However, only minimal loss of detection performance (approximately 10% overall) was experienced if standard screen-film exposures were used with computed radiography. Little change in observer performance was found with variation in plate type, spatial enhancement, or method of hard-copy interpolation. However, perception performance with computed radiographic images was better at lower kilovoltages.     

Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging

To investigate radiologists' performance at interpreting digital radiographic images, we compared the detectability of pneumothoraces on computed radiographic chest images with 0.2-mm pixel size (2.5 Ip/mm) with their detectability on matched conventional screen-film images (5 Ip/mm). Eight radiologists reviewed 50 computed and 50 screen-film chest radiographs from 25 patients with pneumothoraces and 25 patients with other (or no) abnormalities. Four of the readers who best detected pneumothoraces on screen-film examinations performed worse when interpreting computed radiographic studies; the other four readers detected pneumothoraces similarly with both techniques. No relationship was found between the size of a pneumothorax and its likelihood of detection by either technique. These results raise concerns about implementing computed radiography for comprehensive chest imaging.     

Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography

OBJECTIVES: To compare the image quality of panoramic radiographs obtained with storage phosphor plate and screen-film systems. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs were taken in 60 patients both with film and with a storage phosphor plate system (30 with DenOptix (Dentsply/Gendex) and 30 with Digora PCT). The images were obtained with either the Cranex Tome or the Scanora multimodal X-ray unit. The screen-film combination was Lanex medium/Curix Ortho HT-G. The digital images were displayed as 8-bit images with a 300 dpi resolution on a 19" monitor and the film images were placed on a light box adjacent to the screen. Ten observers evaluated diagnostic image quality by means of visual grading analysis of different anatomical structures. The structures were scored as being visualized much better (5), better (4), equal (3), worse (2) or much worse (1) in the digital images than in the film images. The mean number of patients receiving the different scores was calculated. Statistical methods used were Wilcoxon sign rank test and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: On average, visualization was equal in 19 of the 30 patients imaged using Digora PCT; in 10 it was worse. The corresponding values for DenOptix were 20 and 9. The difference between the film-based and the digital images was small but statistically significant (P<0.0001). The difference between the two image plate systems was not statistically significant (P>/=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that digital panoramic radiographs are equivalent to film-based images for most purposes.     

Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and Cobb angle measurements obtained with a digital scanning method of scoliosis radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple images were reconstructed into one image at a workstation. A low-dose alternative was to use digital pulsed fluoroscopy. Dose measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson phantom. At the same time, kerma area-product values were recorded. A Monte Carlo dose calculation also was performed. Image quality was evaluated with a contrast-detail phantom and visual grading system. Angle measurements were evaluated with an angle phantom and measurements obtained on patient images. RESULTS: The effective radiation dose was 0.087 mSv for screen-film imaging, 0.16 mSv for digital exposure imaging, and 0.017 mSv for digital fluoroscopy; the corresponding kerma area-product values were 0.43, 0.87, and 0.097 Gy. cm(2), respectively. The image quality of the digital exposure and screen-film images was about equal at visual grading, whereas fluoroscopy had lower image quality. The angle phantom had lower angle values with digital fluoroscopy, although the difference in measured angles was less than 0.5 degrees. The patient images showed no difference in angles. CONCLUSION: The described digital scanning method has acceptable image quality and adequate accuracy in angle measurements. The radiation dose required for digital exposure imaging is higher than that required for screen-film imaging, but that required for digital fluoroscopy is much lower.     

Excretory urography using computed radiography

A computed radiographic system for generating digital film images was evaluated in the performance of excretory urography. Three experienced radiologists reviewed digital and conventional screen-film urograms for 100 patients in a prospective study to evaluate the clinical utility of the digital system. Results indicate no difference between digital and screen-film urograms in diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, or receiver-operating-characteristic curves for differentiating normal from abnormal studies. Readers' performances in making specific diagnoses were also the same with both techniques.     

Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of an active-matrix flat-panel x-ray detector for reduced-dose imaging of simulated arthritic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A digital x-ray detector based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon technology with a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, matrix of 3,000 x 3,000 pixels, pixel size of 143 micrometer, and digital output of 14 bits was used. State-of-the-art screen-film radiographs were compared with digital images obtained at doses equivalent to those obtained with system speeds of 400, 560, and 800. The phantom was composed of a human hand skeleton on an acrylic plate with drilled holes simulating bone erosions of different diameters and depths. Results of four independent observers were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector resulted in better diagnostic performance than did the screen-film combination, with the dose being the same for both modalities (P <.05). For digital images obtained at reduced doses, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: The improved diagnostic performance with digital radiographs obtained with the cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector suggests that this detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction for specific diagnostic tasks, without loss of diagnostic accuracy.     

Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of full-field slot-scan charge-coupled device (CCD)-based digital radiography in the detection of simulated chest diseases in clinical conditions versus that of two screen-film techniques: advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) and Bucky radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated nodules and interstitial nodular and interstitial linear lesions were attached onto an anthropomorphic chest phantom. One hundred sixty-eight lesions were distributed over 25 configurations. A posteroanterior chest radiograph of each configuration was obtained with each technique. The images were presented to six observers. Each lesion was assigned one of two outcome scores: "detected" or "not detected." False-positive readings were evaluated. Differences between the imaging methods were analyzed by using a semiparametric logistic regression model. RESULTS: For simulated nodules and interstitial linear disease, no statistically significant difference was found in diagnostic performance between CCD digital radiography and AMBER. The detection of simulated interstitial nodular disease was better with CCD digital radiography than with AMBER: Sensitivity was 71% (77 of 108 interstitial nodular lesions) with CCD digital radiography but was 56% (60 of 108 lesions) with AMBER (P =.041). Better results for the detection of all lesion types in the mediastinum were observed with CCD digital radiography than with Bucky screen-film radiography: Sensitivity was 45% (227 of 504 total simulated lesions) with CCD digital radiography but was 24% (119 of 504 lesions) with Bucky radiography (P <.001). There were fewer false-positive observations with CCD digital radiography (35 [5.7%] of 609 observations) than with Bucky radiography (47 [9.5%] of 497 observations; P =.012). CONCLUSION: Differences were in favor of the full-field slot-scan CCD digital radiographic technique. This technique provides a digital alternative to AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography.     

Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) were compared in 30 patients with histologically proved bladder cancer. MR imaging was accurate in depicting the presence or absence of extravesical spread in 22 patients (accuracy, 73%; sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 62%), and CT was accurate in 24 patients (accuracy, 80%; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 62%). The MR examinations of two patients were of undiagnostic quality and therefore considered to be technical failures. Each technique resulted in five false-positive and one false-negative examination for the diagnosis of extravesical tumor spread. In 28 patients the integrity of the bladder wall was assessed with MR imaging. In 22 patients the bladder wall was disrupted, and 18 of these patients had deep muscle invasion. In six patients the bladder wall was intact, and none of these patients had evidence of deep muscle invasion at pathologic examination. In this study MR imaging was slightly inferior to CT in the delineation of invasive tumors beyond the bladder wall. However, if one excludes from analysis the two patients with undiagnostic studies, there is no significant difference in accuracy between the two techniques.     

Interactive magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) with adaptive averaging

PURPOSE: To implement and evaluate a technique for adaptively averaging 2D magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) images obtained using an interactive imaging system with a view to improving image quality at reduced fields of view (FOVs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images were obtained using an interactive implementation of a single-shot half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) technique. Software was developed for adaptively averaging images, and an evaluation was performed in a phantom and a cohort of 10 patients referred for standard MRC. Adaptively averaged and standard single-shot MRC images were evaluated with respect to their ability to demonstrate the common bile duct and main left and right intrahepatic duct branches. RESULTS: In all patient studies there was no difference in the ability of either the adaptive technique or the standard single-shot method to demonstrate the common bile duct and the main left and right intrahepatic duct branches. However, in seven of the 10 patient studies the adaptive technique provided better visualization of the peripheral bile duct system (P = 0.035; sign test). There was no difference in the diagnostic confidence of the two techniques (P = 0.32, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Adaptive averaging of MRC images obtained using an interactive imaging paradigm significantly improves visualization of peripheral intrahepatic ducts.     

Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality and performance of a chest digital radiography system and to compare this with the image quality and performance of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography (AMBER) and Bucky screen-film radiography systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chest digital radiography system is a digital charge-coupled device (CCD) chest imaging unit that uses slot-scan technology. A contrast-detail test object was used in combination with a phantom that simulates the primary and scatter transmission for the lungs and mediastinum. Twelve phantom images were obtained with each modality (ie, CCD digital radiography and AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography) and were judged by six observers. CCD digital radiography soft-copy reading was compared with AMBER hard-copy reading. To measure image quality, contrast-detail curves were constructed from the observer data. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For the lung configuration, contrast-detail curves showed lower threshold depth for hard-copy images obtained with CCD digital radiography than for those obtained with Bucky screen-film radiography. For hard-copy images, the difference between contrast-detail curves for CCD digital radiography and those for Bucky screen-film radiography was statistically significant (P < .006). No significant difference was found between CCD digital radiography and AMBER for hard-copy images obtained in either the lung or mediastinum configuration. For the lung configuration, a lower threshold depth was observed for CCD digital radiography soft-copy reading than for AMBER hard-copy reading, with significantly different contrast-detail curves for CCD digital radiography soft copy and AMBER hard copy (P < .006). No significant difference was found between either system for the mediastinum configuration. CONCLUSION: Contrast-detail curves indicate that image quality for the CCD chest system provides a digital alternative to AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography.     

MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: value of axial three-dimensional Fourier transformation GRASS images.

Axial MR images of 40 knees in 37 patients with clinically suspected meniscal tears were obtained by using a three-dimensional (3-D) Fourier transform, gradient-refocused acquisition in the steady state (GRASS) pulse sequence. All knees also were examined in both coronal and sagittal planes with a two-dimensional (2-D) Fourier transform, spin-echo pulse sequence for T1-weighted images and a multiplanar GRASS pulse sequence for T2*-weighted images (conventional 2-D pulse sequences). Arthroscopic confirmation was available in all cases and was used as the gold standard. In these 40 knees, 32 of 33 meniscal tears and 45 of 47 normal menisci were correctly identified with axial 3-D imaging, yielding a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 96%. Conversely, the sensitivity was 82% and the specificity was 100% for the 2-D technique in the diagnosis of meniscal tears. A combination of both techniques yielded 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% accuracy in the evaluation of the menisci. Seven discrepancies between the findings of the two techniques were found in the evaluation of 33 arthroscopically proved torn menisci; six of the seven represented false-negative 2-D images and one was a false-negative axial 3-D image. Of 47 normal menisci, only two false-positives occurred with axial 3-D imaging and none with 2-D imaging. Despite the lack of a statistically significant difference, these preliminary findings suggest that the sensitivity in the diagnosis of meniscal tears can be improved by adding thin-sliced axial images with the 3-D GRASS pulse sequence to conventional 2-D imaging.     

Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate image quality and dose for abdominal imaging techniques that could be used as part of a computed tomographic (CT) urographic examination: screen-film (S-F) radiography or computed radiography (CR), performed with moving and stationary grids, and CT scanned projection radiography (CT SPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An image quality phantom underwent imaging with moving and stationary grids with both a clinical S-F combination and CR plate. CT SPR was performed with six CT scanners at various milliampere second and kilovolt peak settings. Entrance skin exposure (ESE); spatial, contrast, and temporal resolutions; geometric accuracy; and artifacts were assessed. RESULTS: S-F or CR images, with either grid, provided image quality equivalent to that with the clinical standard, S-F with a moving grid. ESE values for both S-F and CR were 435 mR (112.2 microC/kg [1 mR = 0.258 microC/kg]) with a moving grid and 226 mR (58.3 microC/kg) with a stationary grid. All CT SPR images provided inferior spatial resolution compared with S-F or CR images. High-contrast objects generated substantial artifacts on CT SPR images. Compared with S-F, CR and CT SPR provided improved resolution of small low-contrast objects. The contrast between iodine and soft-tissue-mimicking structures on CT SPR images acquired at 80 kVp was twice that at 120 kVp. CT SPR images with acceptable noise levels required a midline ESE value of approximately 300 mR (77.4 microC/kg) at 80 kVp. CONCLUSION: S-F and CR provided better spatial resolution than did CT SPR. However, CT SPR provided improved low-contrast resolution compared with S-F, at exposures comparable to those used for S-F or CR.     

Image content extraction: application to MR images of the brain.

A system for automatically extracting image content features was developed that combines registration to a labeled atlas with natural language processing of free-text radiology reports. The system was then tested with T1-weighted, spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies of the brain performed in nine patients. The locations of 599 structures were visually assessed by an experienced radiologist and compared with the locations indicated by automated output. The in-plane accuracy of the contours was subjectively evaluated as either good, moderate, or poor. The criterion for classifying a structure as correctly located was that 90% or more of all the images containing the structure had to be correctly identified. For 98% of the structures, the images identified by the automated algorithm agreed with those identified by the radiologist, and in 83% of cases, image contours showed a good in-plane overlap. The results of this validation study demonstrate that this combination of registration and natural language processing is accurate in identifying relevant images from brain MR imaging studies. However, the range of applicability of this technique has yet to be determined by applying the technique to a large number of studies.     

Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: To compare the radiation doses received by patients during bedside chest radiography when a computed radiography system was used and when a 400-speed screen-film system was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed whereby all patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit were randomly assigned at admission to have all radiographic chest images obtained with either computed or conventional screen-film radiography. Doses were measured for 1 year, during which 269 patients underwent imaging. For these patients, surface entry doses were measured by means of individual thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the skin at the center of the radiation beam. In addition, data were collected relating to the patient and examination characteristics, as well as to repeat examinations. Effective doses were calculated. RESULTS: The patients in the two arms of the study were well matched. The surface entry doses were higher in the computed radiography group (median, 0.21 mGy for computed radiography and 0.16 mGy for conventional radiography), and the effective doses were also higher (median, 0.036 mSv for computed radiography and 0.027 mSv for conventional radiography). Fewer examinations were repeated when computed radiography was used. CONCLUSION: When computed radiography was used, patient doses increased. The speed of this computed radiography system, which uses phosphor plate imaging, equates approximately to a 300-speed screen-film system.     

Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs. screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics

The imaging performance of a recently developed digital flat-panel detector system was compared with conventional screen-film imaging in an observer preference study. In total, 34 image pairs of various regions of the skeleton were obtained in 24 patients; 30 image pairs were included in the study. The conventional images were acquired with 250- and 400-speed screen-film combinations, using the standard technique of our department. Within hours, the digital images were obtained using identical exposure parameters. The digital system employed a large-area (43x43 cm) flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon (Trixell Pixium 4600), integrated in a Bucky table. Six radiologists independently evaluated the image pairs with respect to image latitude, soft tissue rendition, rendition of the periosteal and enosteal border of cortical bone, rendition of cancellous bone and the visibility of potentially present pathological changes, using a subjective five-point scale. The digital images were rated significantly (p=0.001) better than the screen-film images with respect to soft tissue rendition and image latitude. Also the rendition of the cancellous bone and the periosteal and enosteal border of the cortical bone was rated significantly (p=0.05) better for the flat-panel detector. The visibility of pathological lesions was equivalent; only large-area sclerotic lesions (n=2) were seen superiorly on screen-film images. The new digital flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon appears to be at least equivalent to conventional screen-film combinations for skeletal examinations, and in most respects even superior.     

Preoperative sizing of meniscal allografts in meniscus transplantation

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging techniques in preoperative sizing for allograft meniscus transplantation. Twelve cadaveric knee specimens underwent sequential radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging scans, and arthrotomy. Meniscus dimensions were measured in multiple planes for the purpose of determining accuracy of imaging studies in comparison with actual meniscus dimensions. Overall, magnetic resonance imaging proved only slightly more accurate than conventional radiography. The mean difference between magnetic resonance imaging measurements and actual meniscus dimensions was 2.25 +/- 2.04 mm. The mean difference between radiographic measurements and actual meniscus dimensions was 2.35 +/- 1.79 mm. Neither imaging technique was accurate for measuring individual meniscus dimensions, with only 35% of images measuring within 2 mm of actual meniscus dimensions. Using less stringent criteria for accuracy (within 5 mm), radiography and magnetic resonance imaging were 79% and 83% reliable, respectively. Failure to obtain true anteroposterior or lateral images (15 degrees of external and internal rotation) increased measurement inaccuracy. Intraobserver agreement was significantly higher for magnetic resonance imaging than for radiography. Further research into the development of alternative techniques for more reliable meniscus sizing and better understanding of the tolerance for meniscus size mismatch is necessary.     

Response of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy: assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy

In 15 osteosarcomas and six Ewing sarcomas, response to preoperative chemotherapy was assessed with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging without and with gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) enhancement and with dynamic Gd-DTPA studies, and the results were compared with the scintigraphic findings. All studies were obtained prior to and following preoperative chemotherapy. Static MR imaging was of little value for assessment of response; reduction in signal intensity within soft-tissue masses on the T2-weighted spin-echo images indicated response with a sufficient degree of accuracy (71%) but low sensitivity, whereas an increase in signal intensity after Gd-DTPA administration indicated zones of viable tissue with low specificity. With three-phase skeletal scintigraphy, the findings in the perfusion and blood-pool phases were of no value, whereas the findings in the osseous phase allowed the prediction of response with an accuracy of 73.7%. Of all techniques employed, dynamic MR imaging had the highest degree of accuracy (85.7%) and was superior to scintigraphy, particularly in patients who were receiving intraarterial chemotherapy.     

Computed radiography versus screen-film radiography: detection of pulmonary edema in a rabbit model that simulates neonatal pulmonary infiltrates.

PURPOSE: To determine if computed radiography is equivalent to screen-film radiography in depicting pulmonary edema and to determine if radiation exposure can be reduced with computed radiography while maintaining equivalent diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary edema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oleic acid was intravenously injected into three rabbits at each of four doses: 0, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 mL/kg. Two hours later, chest computed radiographs and screen-film radiographs were obtained at 60 kVp and 1.1 mAs. Additional computed radiographs were obtained after reducing milliampere seconds or by reducing milliampere seconds and increasing the kilovolt peak, which reduced bone marrow exposure by up to 20%. The presence of pulmonary opacities, "truth," was established by the wet-dry weight ratio and by chest computed tomography (CT). The radiographs were masked and randomized. Four observers rated the images for the presence of parenchymal opacities with a dichotomous score and judged the quality of the radiographs on a scale from 1 (worst) to 6 (best). Cochran Q tests and McNemar tests were used to analyze the differences in paired comparisons. Image quality was evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between truth and observer ability to detect opacity for either modality or for any exposure (P > .05). There was no significant difference between computed radiography and screen-film radiography for image quality (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Computed radiography is equivalent to screen-film radiography in the detection of pulmonary edema. Radiation exposure reduction of 20% can be achieved without affecting pulmonary edema detection or image quality.     

Screen-film mammography versus xeromammography in the detection of breast cancer

There are two common methods of obtaining high-quality screening mammography: screen-film mammography (more simply, mammography) using a dedicated unit, and xeromammography. We studied the accuracy of the two techniques in detecting breast cancer by a retrospective study, analysing accuracy of interpretation in cases where both mammography and xeromammography were performed. Seventy-six patients were considered with 86 biopsies and mammograms resulting in detection of 32 cancers and 54 benign lesions. There was no difference in accuracy of interpretation between mammography and xeromammography. The sensitivities were: mammography 0.91, xeromammography 0.88. The specificities were: mammography 0.63, xeromammography 0.75. We conclude that both modalities are comparable in detecting cancer when optimal technique and experienced personnel are used.     

Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR.

PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to assess the value of three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR sequences relative to contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR imaging in the diagnosis of carotid cavernous fistula (CCF).METHODSSeventeen patients with 19 angiographically proved CCFs had contrast-enhanced CT, spin-echo MR imaging, and 3-D FISP imaging. Three observers assessed these imaging studies as well as those of 43 control sides in a blinded manner for the presence or absence of CCF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic utility of each imaging technique. In a nonblinded study, contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images were also evaluated.RESULTSHigher diagnostic accuracy was obtained with 3-D FISP sequences, as the shunt flow within the cavernous sinus was well seen. Sensitivity of 3-D FISP images was 83% and specificity was 100% in the blinded study. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the diagnostic performance of observers was found to be better with the 3-D FISP images than with the spin-echo MR images. Although there were no significant difference between 3-D FISP and contrast-enhanced CT, higher diagnostic performance was obtained with 3-D FISP images. In three CCFs without anterior drainage, a diagnosis was made only from the 3-D FISP images. The contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images were not helpful, since the cavernous sinuses enhanced.CONCLUSIONThree-dimensional FISP imaging is superior to spin-echo MR imaging and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of CCF. Contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images are not helpful for the evaluation of CCF.