AIB1、HER - 2 表达与乳腺癌他莫西芬耐药的关系

目的：探讨HER-2和AIB1在ER阳性乳腺癌他莫西芬耐药中的作用.方法：选择复发转移后接受他莫西芬治疗的女性乳腺癌患者70例,采用免疫组化SP法检测的乳腺癌组织中HER-2和AIB1的表达,分析二者与他莫西芬疗效的关系.结果：他莫西芬治疗总有效率42.9%.HER-2（＋）组治疗有效率28.6%,HER-2（-）组治疗有效率52.4%,有统计学差异（P=0.041）.AIB1（＋）组治疗有效率28.6%,AIB1（-）组治疗有效率64.3%,有统计学差异（P=0.003）.他莫西芬在HER-2（＋）AIB1（＋）、HER-2（-）AIB1（＋）、HER-2（＋）AIB1（-）、HER-2（-）AIB1（-）四组中的治疗有效率分别为27.3%、30.0%、33.3%、72.7%,有显著差异（P=0.008）.结论：HER-2和AIB1的表达均与乳腺癌他莫西芬治疗疗效有关,二者共表达提示他莫西芬耐药.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the estrogen receptor modulator amplified in breast cancer (AIB1) for predicting clinical outcome after adjuvant tamoxifen in breast cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the estrogen receptor (ER) modulator Amplified In Breast cancer-1 (AIB1) have been reported to be of importance for the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We have analyzed AIB1 and EGFR by immunohistochemistry in primary breast cancers (n = 297) arranged in a tissue microarray in order to predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for two years. High expression of AIB1 was associated with DNA-nondiploidy, high S-phase fraction, HER2 amplification, and short term (相似文献   

贵州省720例乳腺癌HER-2的表达情况及抗HER-2治疗的回顾性分析

背景与目的：乳腺癌是严重威胁女性生命的恶性肿瘤之一,在我国汉族与其他少数民族乳腺癌的发病率及其HER-2基因表达差异成为学者关注的问题。该研究旨在分析贵州省乳腺癌HER-2基因表达的民族差异性,评价应用曲妥珠单抗行分子靶向治疗的临床疗效,探讨多种临床因素对贵州省乳腺癌患者生存预后的影响。方法：回顾性分析2007年1月—2013年12月在贵州医科大学附属肿瘤医院接受治疗的720例女性乳腺癌患者的随访情况,采用SPSS 17.0中的Kaplan-Meier法对患者进行生存分析,统计患者无病生存期(disease free survival,DFS)及总生存期(overall survival,OS),采用Log-rank检验进行因素间比较。采用Cox回归模式进行多因素检验,分析乳腺癌的独立预后因素。结果：入组的720例患者中,HER-2阴性表达520例(72.2%),HER-2阳性表达200例(27.8%)。200例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者中,汉族177例(177/645,27.4%),少数民族23例(23/75,30.7%)。200例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者中,行抗HER-2治疗37例(18.5%),未行抗HER-2治疗163例(81.5%),可分为治疗组及对照组。统计分析显示,治疗组与对照组的DFS和OS差异均有统计学意义(P=0.041和0.022)。Cox回归分析提示,雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)和Ki-67是入组乳腺癌患者的独立预后因素(P=0.03和0.016),孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR和HER-2不是独立预后因素(P均>0.05);其中汉族乳腺癌患者的ER和Ki-67是独立预后因素(P=0.018和0.031),PR和HER-2不是独立预后因素(P均>0.05);少数民族乳腺癌患者的ER、PR、HER-2和Ki-67均不是独立的预后因素(P均>0.05)。结论：HER-2基因阳性表达不具有民族差异性。HER-2阳性患者应用曲妥珠单抗行抗HER-2治疗可明显改善预后,延长DFS及OS,但目前贵州省行抗HER-2治疗人群不足20%。本研究初步提示ER、Ki-67作为乳腺癌独立的预后因素具有民族差异性的趋势。     

绝经前乳腺癌患者肿瘤组织中AIB-1蛋白表达与他莫昔芬耐药关系的研究

探讨绝经前乳腺癌患者肿瘤组织中AIB-1蛋白表达与他莫昔芬耐药关系。方法:选取2004年1月至2004年12月河北医科大学第四医院外一科手术切除并经病理证实、且随访资料完整的绝经前女性原发性乳腺癌206例,按照免疫组化检测结果分成:ER+/PR+且接受他莫昔芬治疗组（Tamoxifen group,T组）,ER-PR-的非内分泌治疗组（Contol group,C组）;T组及C组均按AIB-1及Her-2表达状态分为不同亚组。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析各组别无病生存（disease-free survival,DFS）及总生存（overall survival,OS）时间。结果:术后随访30～84个月,中位时间65个月,58例患者出现局部复发或远位转移,5年DFS为71.84%（148/206）;死亡36例,5年OS为82.52%（170/206）。随着组织学分级、腋淋巴结阳性及Her-2蛋白表达的增高,AIB-1蛋白呈现高表达（χ2=12.573,P=0.002;χ2=7.939,P=0.005;χ2=4.502,P=0.036）;分层分析中,T组AIB-1及Her-2均高表达亚组的DFS和OS低于其他亚组,且有统计学差异（χ2=5.900,P=0.002;χ2=4.533,P=0.049）;该亚组患者的生存曲线明显低于其他亚组患者（Log-rank检验,χ2=8.903,P=0.005;χ2=9.405,P=0.004）。结论:AIB-1蛋白高表达常常伴随着不良的临床生物学行为和预后,AIB-1蛋白高表达、同时伴有Her-2高表达的绝经前乳腺癌患者对他莫昔芬治疗耐药,提示AIB-1的表达可以作为预测他莫昔芬耐药的因子。      

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) tumor expression in predicting the response to epirubicin and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with breast cancer enrolled in a single institution trial of primary anthracycline and tamoxifen therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of HIF-1alpha was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 187 patients with T(2-4) N(0-1) breast cancer enrolled in a randomized trial comparing four cycles of single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin + tamoxifen as primary systemic treatment. All patients postoperatively received four cycles of the four weekly i.v. CMF regimen (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil). Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumors also underwent 5 years of treatment with adjuvant tamoxifen. Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) was also scored as a marker of HIF activity. RESULTS: Overall response to therapy progressively decreased with increasing tumor HIF-1alpha (P < 0.05), and HIF-1alpha was an independent predictor of response (P < 0.048). HIF-1alpha expression was also associated with a significantly shorter DFS (P < 0.02) in all patients and in ER-positive but not in ER-negative patients. Furthermore, CAIX positivity conferred a significantly shorter DFS (P = 0.02) compared with CAIX-negative tumors in patients with HIF-1alpha-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: HIF-1alpha expression in patients with breast cancer is a marker of poor therapy response and outcome, especially in ER-positive patients. The combination of two hypoxia markers has greater utility than assessing just one, and patients with hypoxia markers in their tumors may be suitable for administration of drugs that reduce HIF-1alpha expression and increase oxygen delivery to the tumor bed before starting neoadjuvant therapies.     

雌激素诱导蛋白pS2表达与ER阳性原发乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗疗效的关系

目的:探讨雌激素诱导蛋白pS2的表达与乳腺癌临床参数和辅助三苯氧胺TAM治疗疗效的关系,明确pS2对辅助内分泌治疗的指导地位。方法:采用免疫组化S蛳P法检测81例ER阳性原发乳腺癌的石蜡切片pS2的表达, 统计学分析其与预后的关系。结果:原发乳腺癌pS2的阳性表达率为66.7 %,其表达与手术年龄(P=0.037)、月经状态(P=0.016)、肿瘤大小(P=0.029)、PR表达情况(P<0.001)密切相关,年龄小于50岁、绝经前、小肿瘤、PR阳性的患者pS2阳性率高。单因素分析和多因素分析均表明pS2是预测OS的独立预后因子。同时pS2对DFS也具有独立预后价值(P=0.023)。结论:pS2是预测ER阳性乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗疗效的独立指标。     

Clinical outcome of adjuvant endocrine treatment according to PR and HER-2 status in early breast cancer.

Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)- and/or HER-2 overexpressing breast carcinomas may derive lower benefit from endocrine treatment. We examined retrospectively data from 972 breast cancer patients who received tamoxifen (725), tamoxifen + Gn-RH analogs (127) and aromatase inhibitors (120) as adjuvant treatments. ER+/PR- versus ER+/PR+ tumours were characterised by larger size (P = 0.001), higher tumour grade (P = 0.001), higher Ki-67 expression (P = 0.001) and lower mean ER (P = 0.000) and HER-2 expression (P = 0.000). At univariate analysis, tumour grading [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.4-11.1; P = 0.007], nodal status (HR = 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-5.7; P = 0.000), tumour diameter (HR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.7-4.7; P = 0.000) lack of PR expression (HR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.4; P = 0.002) and HER-2 overexpression (HR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.5; P = 0.03), as well as Ki 67 expression (HR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.7; P = 0.04) were associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS). At the multivariate analysis, nodal status (HR = 3.6; 95% CI 1.9-6.8; P = 0.0001), lack of PR expression (HR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.0; P = 0.003) and tumour diameter (HR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-3.8; P = 0.018) retained their prognostic significance, whereas HER-2 overexpression was associated with a trend towards shorter DFS that was of borderline statistical significance (HR = 2.0; 95 % CI 1.0-3.9; P = 0.05). Our data suggest that lack of PR expression and HER-2 overexpression are both associated with aggressive tumour features, but the prognostic information of PR status on the risk of recurrence in endocrine-treated breast cancer patients is stronger.     

Measuring IGF-1, ER-α and EGFR expression can predict tamoxifen-resistance in ER-positive breast cancer

In vitro studies have suggested that tamoxifen resistance may be due to altered expression and downstream signalling of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor (IGF-1l), oestrogen receptor-alpha (ERα), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER-2. We investigated which gene expressions could predict tamoxifen resistant breast cancer. Expression of IGF-1R, IGF-1 ligand (IGF-1), ERα, EGFR and HER-2 in 91 ER-positive breast cancer tumours were measured using real-time PCR and correlated with clinical outcome. The tamoxifen resistant group (n=20) consisted of: i) tumours which were resistant to neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and ii) tumours which were excised from patients who later developed recurrence or metastasis during adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. These were compared with tamoxifen sensitive tumours which were surgical excision specimens from patients who did not develop recurrence/metastasis during adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Tumours with higher IGF-1 ligand and ERα expression took longer to develop tamoxifen resistance. Tamoxifen resistant tumours had lower IGF-1 and ERα expression compared to tamoxifen-sensitive tumours. IGF-1 expression strongly correlated with ERα expression in the tamoxifen sensitive group only. ERα inversely correlated with EGFR expression in the tamoxifen resistant group only. We conclude that IGF-1 ligand and ERα expression in breast carcinomas can be measured to predict tamoxifen resistance. Measuring ERα expression using RT-PCR may be more sensitive than immunohistochemistry in determining anti-oestrogen sensitivity.     

Her-2/neu overexpression and response to oophorectomy plus tamoxifen adjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive premenopausal women with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Studies evaluating the relationship of HER-2/neu breast tumor status and response to adjuvant endocrine therapy have reached conflicting conclusions about resistance of HER-2/neu-positive tumors to this treatment. We studied 282 patients participating in a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen or observation who had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and whose tumors were evaluated for HER-2/neu overexpression by immunohistochemistry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan-Meier disease-free and overall survival estimate methods were used. RESULTS: HER-2/neu overexpression was a negative prognostic factor for overall survival. In univariate analyses, in HER-2/neu-positive patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant endocrine therapy was 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.89); for HER-2/neu-negative patients, the corresponding HR for DFS was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.71). The overall survival (OS) data were HR=0.26 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.92) and HR=0.68 (95% CI, 0.32 to 1.42) for HER-2/neu-positive and HER-2/neu-negative patients, respectively. In multivariate models, the P values for tests of interaction of HER-2/neu status and response to adjuvant endocrine therapy were 0.18 and 0.07 for DFS and OS, respectively. Kaplan-Meier DFS and OS curves and 3-year DFS estimates were consistent in showing greater benefit to the HER-2/neu-positive subgroup given adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: HER-2/neu overexpression does not adversely and may favorably influence response to adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen treatment in patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors.     

Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Expression of ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 (epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2/neu) in breast cancer may cause tamoxifen resistance, but not all studies concur. Additionally, the relationship between ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 expression and response to selective aromatase inhibitors is unknown. A neoadjuvant study for primary breast cancer that randomized treatment between letrozole and tamoxifen provided a context within which these issues could be addressed prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with estrogen- and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PgR+) primary breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to 4 months of neoadjuvant letrozole 2.5 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily in a double-blinded study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER and PgR was conducted on pretreatment biopsies and assessed by the Allred score. ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 IHC were assessed by intensity and completeness of membranous staining according to published criteria. RESULTS: For study biopsy-confirmed ER+ and/or PgR+ cases that received letrozole, 60% responded and 48% underwent successful breast-conserving surgery. The response to tamoxifen was inferior (41%, P =.004), and fewer patients underwent breast conservation (36%, P =.036). Differences in response rates between letrozole and tamoxifen were most marked for tumors that were positive for ErbB-1 and/or ErbB-2 and ER (88% v 21%, P =.0004). CONCLUSION: ER+, ErbB-1+, and/or ErbB-2+ primary breast cancer responded well to letrozole, but responses to tamoxifen were infrequent. This suggests that ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 signaling through ER is ligand-dependent and that the growth-promoting effects of these receptor tyrosine kinases on ER+ breast cancer can be inhibited by potent estrogen deprivation therapy.     

Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND: HER-2/neu, which encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, is amplified and overexpressed in 20%-25% of human breast cancers. Such tumors are often resistant to hormone therapy. Despite a general inverse association between HER-2/neu amplification/overexpression and estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) expression, a fraction of patients are both HER-2/neu- and hormone receptor (HR)-positive. The efficacy of hormone therapy in this group is currently a matter of debate. To better understand the relationship between HER-2/neu positivity and HR expression, we analyzed HER-2/neu, ER, and PR as continuous variables in breast cancer cell lines and two cohorts of primary breast cancer patients. METHODS: HER-2/neu and ER/PR expression was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA), respectively, in 14 human breast cancer cell lines, some of which had been transfected with the HER-2/neu gene. For the clinical study population, HER-2/neu protein levels were assessed by ELISA (cohort A, n = 665), and HER-2/neu gene copy number was determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (cohort B, n = 894). ER/PR expression was analyzed by EIA (cohort A) or radioligand binding (cohort B). Associations between HER-2/neu and ER/PR expression were analyzed using Spearman's rho correlation and the chi-square test, and absolute levels were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: HR-positive human breast cancer cell lines transfected with the HER-2/neu gene expressed statistically significantly lower levels of ER and PR than parental lines. In the clinical cohorts, levels of HER-2/neu overexpression and gene amplification were inversely correlated with ER/PR levels (Cohort A [n = 112]: for ER, r = -0.34, P<.001; for PR, r = -0.24, P =.010. Cohort B [n = 188]: for ER, r = -0.39, P<.001; for PR, r = -0.26, P<.001). Among patients with HR-positive tumors, HER-2/neu-positive tumors had statistically significantly lower ER/PR levels than HER-2/neu-negative ones (Cohort A: for ER, median = 25 fmol/mg [interquartile range [IQR] = 13-78] versus median = 38.5 fmol/mg [IQR = 17-99] and P =.031; for PR, median = 35 fmol/mg [IQR = 12-119] versus median = 88.5 fmol/mg [IQR = 22-236] and P<.001. Cohort B: for ER, median = 44 fmol/mg [IQR = 13-156] versus median = 92 fmol/mg [IQR = 35-235] and P<.001; for PR, median = 36 fmol/mg [IQR = 13-108] versus median = 84 fmol/mg [IQR = 24-250] and P<.001). Patients with higher levels of HER-2/neu overexpression or amplification had statistically significantly lower levels of ER/PR than patients with lower levels of HER-2/neu overexpression or amplification. CONCLUSION: Because absolute HR levels are strongly related to response to hormone therapy in primary and advanced breast cancer, reduced ER/PR expression may be one mechanism to explain the relative resistance of HER-2/neu-positive:HR-positive tumors to hormone therapy.     

HER-2 amplification, HER-1 expression, and tamoxifen response in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a southwest oncology group study.

PURPOSE: Preclinical data indicate that expression of the ErbB family of receptors, such as HER-2 and HER-1 (EGFR) may be involved in endocrine resistance. Evidence of resistance from clinical studies has been inconsistent. The present study examined whether HER-2 gene amplification or HER-1 expression predicted response to tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and forty nine patients had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and received daily tamoxifen as initial therapy for advanced disease. HER-2 gene amplification, detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and HER-1 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemistry, was determined on 136 and 204 patients, respectively. RESULTS: HER-2 amplification was correlated with lower ER (P = 0.02), HER-1 positivity (P = 0.004), and HER-2 protein overexpression (P < 0.00001). The response rate was 56% for HER-2 non-amplified versus 47% for HER-2 amplified tumors (P = 0.38), and 58% for HER-1-negative versus 36% for HER-1-positive (P = 0.05). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7 months for non-amplified HER-2 tumors and 5 months (P = 0.007) for amplified HER-2 tumors, and there was a trend toward a better overall survival (OS) in patients with non-amplified HER-2 tumors (median 31 versus 25 months, respectively, P = 0.07). For positive versus negative HER-1 tumors, TTF was 4 versus 8 months (P = 0.08) and median survival was 24 versus 31 months (P = 0.41). Combining HER-1 expression and HER-2 gene status, patients with both negative HER-1 expression and non-amplified HER-2 had longer TTF (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.03) than if either were positive. In multivariate analysis, HER-2 was not an independent factor for TTF and OS, although HER-1 was significant for TTF only (P 相似文献   

Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen for lymph node-negative breast cancer: updated findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Previously reported information from B-14, a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, demonstrated that patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and negative axillary lymph nodes experienced a prolonged benefit from 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. When these women were rerandomized to receive either placebo or more prolonged tamoxifen therapy, they obtained no additional advantage from tamoxifen through 4 years of follow-up. Because the optimal duration of tamoxifen administration continues to be controversial and because there have been 3 more years of follow-up and a substantial increase in the number of events since our last report, an update of the B-14 study is appropriate. METHODS: Patients (n = 1172) who had completed 5 years of tamoxifen therapy and who were disease free were rerandomized to receive placebo (n = 579) or tamoxifen (n = 593). Survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; the differences between the treatment groups were assessed by the log-rank test. Relative risks of failure (with 95% confidence intervals) were determined by the Cox proportional hazards model. P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Through 7 years after reassignment of tamoxifen-treated patients to either placebo or continued tamoxifen therapy, a slight advantage was observed in patients who discontinued tamoxifen relative to those who continued to receive it: DFS = 82% versus 78% (P =.03), RFS = 94% versus 92% (P =.13), and survival = 94% versus 91% (P =.07), respectively. The lack of benefit from additional tamoxifen therapy was independent of age or other characteristics. CONCLUSION: Through 7 years of follow-up after rerandomization, there continues to be no additional benefit from tamoxifen administered beyond 5 years in women with ER-positive breast cancer and negative axillary lymph nodes.     

Estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) level but not its ER beta cx variant helps to predict tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer.

The antiestrogen tamoxifen, a major endocrine therapy of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, is nevertheless inefficient in 30 to 40% of cases for unknown reasons. We retrospectively studied 50 ER-positive primary breast carcinomas. All of the patients had received tamoxifen as the only adjuvant therapy. They were divided into two groups depending on whether they relapsed within 5 years (16 tamoxifen-resistant cases) or did not relapse within 5 years (34 tamoxifen-sensitive cases). The expression of total ER beta protein, and of ER beta cx protein, was estimated anonymously in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sections, by using specific antibodies and quantifiying nuclear immunostaining with a computer image analyzer. All of the tumors were found to be HER-2/neu-negative by immunohistochemistry. Univariate analysis showed that Scarff-Bloom-Richardsson grade modified by Elston (SBR grade; P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.042), and MIB-1 proliferation index (P = 0.02) were significantly higher in tamoxifen-resistant tumors. A low level of total ER beta, whether in percentage of positive cells or in quantitative immunocytochemical (QIC) score, was also associated with tamoxifen resistance (P = 0.004). ER beta cx expression and lymph node status were similar between the two groups. The expression of ER beta in the total population was positively correlated with ER beta cx (r = 0.63, P < 0.001), and was independent of the other parameters. In a multivariate analysis, ER beta expression was the most important variable (P = 0.001), followed by SBR grade (I+II versus III; P = 0.008), and MIB-1 (P = 0.016). To conclude, tamoxifen resistance is associated with classical variables of aggressive tumors (high SBR grade, proliferation index, and tumor size) but not with node invasiveness. Low ER beta level is an additional independent marker, better than ER alpha level, to predict tamoxifen resistance.     

ER和Ki-67对63例局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的观察

通过回顾性分析局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效进而明确生物标志物对疗效和预后的判断意义。方法:分析2006年1月至2007年12月间63例接受新辅助化疗局部晚期乳腺癌患者,免疫组化法检测ER、HER-2、Ki-67表达情况,术后均接受辅助放疗,并根据激素受体情况选择内分泌治疗。结果:全部患者新辅助化疗有效率达93.6%,不良反应可以耐受。生物标志物表达差异与疗效无明显的相关性,中位随访42个月后,单因素分析显示术前Ki-67≥30%、化疗前与术后ER（-）及术后HER-2（++～+++）是局部晚期乳腺癌无病生存率的不良预后因素。多因素回归分析显示治疗前ER（-）和术后HER-2（++～+++）是对无病生存率有独立影响的不良预后因素（P<0.05）。结论:治疗前ER（-）是局部晚期乳腺癌最重要的不良预后因素,化疗前测定的Ki-67指数和ER表达情况更能反应肿瘤的恶性程度。      

HER-2 amplification impedes the antiproliferative effects of hormone therapy in estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer.

In experimental models, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) amplification leads to estrogen independence and tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human breast cancer cells. Some but not all reports suggest an association between HER-2 positivity and hormone independence in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the antiproliferative effects of endocrine therapy in HER-2-positive/ER-positive primary human breast cancer. The effect on proliferation (Ki67) of hormone therapy was assessed at 2 weeks and/or 12 weeks in biopsies from 115 primary breast cancers with ER-positive tumors. The patients took part in one of 3 neoadjuvant trials of hormonal therapy with a SERM (tamoxifen or idoxifene) or an aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole or vorozole). HER-2 status was assessed by immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Fifteen patients were defined as HER-2 positive by both immunohistochemistry and FISH, with the remaining 100 patients HER-2 negative. Geometric mean Ki67 levels were substantially higher in HER-2-positive than HER-2-negative tumors (27.7% versus 11.5%, respectively; P = 0.003). In HER-2-negative patients, Ki67 was reduced by 62 and 71% at 2 and 12 weeks, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both), but HER-2-positive patients showed no significant fall. The proportional change in Ki67 was significantly different between HER-2-positive and -negative patients (P = 0.014 at 2 weeks; P = 0.047 at 12 weeks). Mean ER levels were lower in the HER-2-positive patients (P = 0.06) but the change in Ki67 was impeded even in those with high ER. Apoptotic index was reduced by 30% at 2 weeks in the HER-2-negative group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in apoptotic index between the groups. It is concluded that ER-positive/HER-2-positive primary breast carcinomas show an impeded antiproliferative response to endocrine therapy that nonetheless may vary between individual treatments. This together with high baseline proliferation is likely to translate to poor clinical response.     

Role of adjuvant endocrine therapy in early-stage breast cancer

The value of adjuvant endocrine therapy in saving lives of women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) early-stage breast cancer cannot be disputed. Tamoxifen has proven to be effective in improving relapse-free and overall survival in both pre- and postmenopausal women with ER(+) early-stage breast cancer. In the meta-analysis of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, the proportional reduction in recurrence and mortality for 5 years of tamoxifen therapy was 50% and 28% respectively for patients with ER(+) tumors. These reductions in recurrence and mortality were similar in both lymph node-negative (N(-)) and lymph node-positive (N(+)) patients and translate to an absolute improvement in 10-year survival of approximately 11% in N(+) patients and 6% in N(-) patients. Current data suggest that about 5 years of tamoxifen therapy is the optimal duration of treatment. For women with ER(-)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR(-)) tumors, tamoxifen does not lower the risk of distant metastases or improve survival. In ER(+) patients, the addition of tamoxifen to chemotherapy further lowers the risk of recurrence by about 30% to 40% when compared to chemotherapy alone. In premenopausal women with ER(+) breast cancer, ovarian ablation has proven to be as effective as chemotherapy in improving both relapse-free and overall survival and the potential additive role of ovarian ablation to chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen is presently being explored in clinical trials. The combination of tamoxifen and ovarian ablation is currently being tested and may be superior to tamoxifen alone. In addition, newer, more effective, and less toxic aromatase inhibitors are also being evaluated in clinical trials in the adjuvant setting and have great promise. "Pure" antiestrogens or selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) will be studied in adjuvant clinical trials in the near future. Recent data also suggest that molecular markers such as HER-2/neu may predict the response to endocrine therapy, and other predictive factors are currently being evaluated. Lastly, there is renewed interest in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, a treatment option that may select those patients with early-stage breast cancer most likely to benefit from endocrine therapy.     

HER-2 expression and cell proliferation: prognostic markers in patients with node-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the clinical relevance of HER-2 expression, widely investigated in breast cancer but with contradictory results, in the largest case series of node-negative breast cancer patients investigated to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pure prognostic value of HER-2 expression was investigated in 529 patients treated with locoregional therapy alone until early relapse. Proliferative activity was evaluated as [3H]thymidine labeling index and HER-2 expression by immunohistochemistry. All biologic determinations were conducted within the context of an intra- and interlaboratory National Quality Control Program. RESULTS: HER-2 expression was not related to relapse-free survival in the overall series but was a significant discriminant of prognosis in the subgroup of patients with rapidly proliferating tumors. Six-year rate of relapse was 40% for patients with highly (> or =30%) positive tumors and 26% for those with weakly HER-2-expressing tumors (P =.039). CONCLUSION: HER-2 expression in association with proliferative activity identifies a subgroup of node-negative breast cancer patients with the worst prognosis, who are candidates for specific intensive adjuvant therapy.