Sex-specific effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain

OBJECTIVE: Considerable research indicates that both high levels of anxiety and female sex are associated with increased sensitivity to experimental pain and greater experience of clinical pain. In general, however, previous research has not investigated the joint effects of sex and anxiety on pain responses. A single previous laboratory-based study indicated that anxiety was inversely related to pain thresholds among men but not among women. The present study examined the relation between pain-related anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain in a sex-dependent manner. DESIGN AND SETTING: A total of 215 (114 women, 101 men) chronic pain patients referred to a multidisciplinary treatment center completed questionnaires assessing anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain. RESULTS: Results generally supported the previous laboratory-based finding indicating that an inverse relation between anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain was present only among male patients. Although male patients with high pain-related anxiety reported greater pain severity, greater interference of pain, and lower levels of daily activity than male patients with low anxiety, this effect was not present among female patients. Moreover, the effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain were not attributable to either hypervigilance or use of passive coping strategies. Potential explanations and implications for the present findings are discussed.     

Sex differences in responses to epidural steroid injection for low back pain.

Sex differences in clinical and experimental pain responses have been widely reported; however, few studies have examined sex differences in outcomes from interventional pain treatment and the predictors thereof. The aims of this study were to examine sex differences in (1) the acute pain produced by epidural steroid injections (ESIs), (2) clinical improvements in pain and pain-related psychological distress and disability after ESIs, and (3) predictors of the clinical response to ESIs. A total of 57 patients (37 menopausal women and 20 men), seen in the pain clinic of a regional medical center for ESI therapy, participated. Patients rated the painfulness of the ESI procedure itself. Also, clinical pain, depression, and disability were assessed before treatment and at 2 weeks and 2 months after the ESIs. Participants also were queried about their expectations of successful pain relief, coping strategies, and pain-related anxiety, which were examined as predictors of treatment outcome. Men reported significantly greater pain intensity and unpleasantness than women for the first injection only. All groups showed significant reductions in clinical pain, depression, and disability at 2 weeks compared to baseline, but minimal change occurred between 2 weeks and 2 months past baseline. No sex differences in the magnitude of treatment response emerged; however, specific dimensions of pain coping were associated with treatment responses in a sex-dependent manner. These findings suggest that the determinants of ESI pain and treatment outcome might differ across sex. PERSPECTIVE: Sex-related influences on pain responses have been widely reported, but few studies have explored sex-dependent predictors of treatment response. These findings indicate that pain coping was differentially associated with outcomes after ESI in women versus men.     

Effects of gender and acute dental pain on thermal pain responses.

OBJECTIVE: Considerable research suggests that females exhibit greater sensitivity to laboratory pain procedures than do males; however, whether the presence of acute clinical pain influences this sex difference in pain sensitivity has not been investigated. The present experiment investigated the effects of sex and acute dental pain on laboratory pain responses. DESIGN: Thermal pain onset and tolerance were determined in 46 dental patients (15 male, 31 female) experiencing pain due to acute irreversible pulpitis and in 33 healthy controls (13 male, 20 female). In addition, measures of mood and coping were obtained in all participants. All subjects participated in two experimental sessions. The first session took place immediately before the patients underwent endodontic treatment for relief of pulpal pain. The second session took place approximately 1-2 weeks later, when pulpitis patients were pain free after treatment. During each session, thermal pain onset and tolerance were assessed with a 1-cm2 contact thermode applied to the right volar forearm using an ascending method of limits. RESULTS: During both sessions, thermal pain onset and tolerance were lower in control females than in control males; however, male and female pulpitis patients did not differ in their thermal pain responses during either session. Pulpitis patients also showed greater affective distress than controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the sex difference in thermal pain sensitivity frequently reported in pain-free subjects appears to be absent in patients presenting with acute dental pain. However, this effect cannot be explained solely based on the presence of clinical pain because the effect on pain threshold and tolerance persisted into session 2, when pulpitis patients were pain free. Potential explanations for these results are discussed.     

Sex differences in the associations among psychological factors and pain report: a novel psychophysical study of patients with chronic low back pain.

Previous studies have consistently suggested that there are sex differences in pain report, but there is no consensus regarding sex differences in the associations among psychological factors and pain report. This cross-sectional study used a novel, clinically relevant, psychophysical pain-induction technique to examine sex differences between sensory and affective pain report and sex differences in the association of depression, pain related anxiety, and catastrophizing with pain report. Patients with chronic low back pain (N = 53) were recruited from an outpatient spine clinic, and those consenting completed self-report measures of pain-related anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, and pain. A measure of induced low back pain was obtained by having study participants perform a protocol on the MedXtrade mark Low-Back Exercise Apparatus. Our results indicated that no sex differences were detected in psychological factors and self-reported or induced low back pain. However, the relationships between pain related anxiety and self-report of low back pain (z = 2.51, P < .05) and between pain-related anxiety and induced low back pain (z = 3.00, P < .05) were significantly stronger in men than women. These findings suggest that anxiety was linked to self-reported and induced low back pain for men, but not for women. PERSPECTIVE: Results of this study suggest that pain-related anxiety has a stronger association with psychophysical and clinical reports of low back pain for men.     

The relationship of sex and clinical pain to experimental pain responses

Considerable research indicates increased experience of clinical pain among females relative to males, and females also demonstrate enhanced responses to experimentally-induced pain. However, previous research has not investigated the relationship between clinical and experimental pain responses in healthy females and males. This experiment examined recent clinical pain as well as thermal pain thresholds and tolerances in 209 (117 female, 92 male) healthy young adults. All subjects completed questionnaires concerning pain-related symptoms over the previous month and subsequently underwent thermal pain assessment. Females reported a larger number of pain sites and greater health care utilization over the month preceding the experimental session, and females also exhibited greater sensitivity to thermal stimuli. In addition, females above the median on the number of pain episodes demonstrated greater thermal pain sensitivity compared to females below the median, but thermal pain responses did not differ as a function of clinical pain among males. The differences remained significant after correcting for psychological variables including hypervigilance and sex role expectancies. These results indicate that experimental pain responses may be more clinically relevant for females than males. Potential explanations and implications for this pattern of results are discussed.     

Somatic focus/awareness: Relationship to negative affect and pain in chronic pain patients

Somatic focus refers to the tendency to notice and report physical symptoms, and has been investigated in relation to chronically painful conditions. This study investigated the relationship between somatic focus, as measured by the Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL), negative affect and pain. A secondary purpose of the present study was to examine sex differences in these relationships. Participants included 280 chronic pain patients (69.6% females, 88.9% Caucasian), who completed a battery of self‐report measures on somatic focus, pain, negative affect, coping, and dysfunction. Results for the overall sample revealed that the PILL shares considerable variance with measures of negative affect, particularly with the physiological components of anxiety and depression. When the results were analyzed separately for male and female patients, it was found that several components of negative affect and cognitive factors play a stronger role in predicting somatic focus among men compared to women. Additional analyses then examined whether somatic focus was predictive of male and female patients’ pain reports. Results indicated that somatic focus explained a small, but unique amount of variance in female patients’ pain reports, which differed from the relationship observed among male patients.     

Sex, gender, and pain: Women and men really are different

Sex-related differences in the experience of both clinical and experimentally induced pain have been widely reported. Specifically, females are at greater risk for developing several chronic pain disorders, and women exhibit greater sensitivity to noxious stimuli in the laboratory compared with men. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for these sex differences. Psychosocial factors such as sex role beliefs, pain coping strategies, mood, and pain-related expectancies may underlie these effects. In addition, there is evidence that familial factors can alter pain responses, and these intergenerational influences may differ as a function of sex. Sex hormones are also known to affect pain responses, which may mediate the sex differences. Although the magnitude of these effects has not been well characterized, there are potentially important practical implications of sex differences in pain responses. These implications are discussed, and directions for future research are delineated.     

Adolescent chronic pain: patterns and predictors of emotional distress in adolescents with chronic pain and their parents

Adolescents with chronic pain also report severe disability and emotional distress. A clinical sample of 80 adolescents and accompanying parents were investigated to first measure the extent of distress, and second to investigate the relationships between adolescent distress, parental distress and adolescent coping. Measures of pain intensity, anxiety, depression, disability and coping were obtained from adolescents. Parents completed measures including their own anxiety, depression and parenting stress. Overall, adolescents reported high levels of disability, depression and anxiety, and parents reported high levels of depression, anxiety and parenting stress. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the best predictors of adolescent emotional distress were the extent to which the adolescents catastrophize and seek social support to cope with the pain. There were no clear predictors of parental anxiety or depression but the specific pattern of parenting stress was best predicted by the younger age of the adolescent, the greater the chronicity of the problem, and the greater the extent of adolescent depression. These findings suggest that emotional coping is a critical variable in the distress associated with adolescent chronic pain. It is argued that adolescent emotional coping may best be understood within a relational context of seeking emotional support.     

Sex and age differences in coping styles among children with chronic pain

The purpose of this study was to examine sex and age differences in coping strategies among pediatric patients with chronic pain. Sex differences are reported in the adult pain and coping literatures, but little attention has been given to possible distinctions in coping styles in the pediatric chronic pain population. Investigating pain coping skills at an early age may provide clinicians with a better understanding of the evolution of characteristic coping styles and identify areas for intervention. Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), pain coping strategies (Pain Coping Questionnaire), and coping efficacy were assessed in children (ages 8-12 years) and adolescents (ages 13-18 years), presenting to a pediatric chronic pain clinic (n=272). Significant sex differences in coping strategies were found. After controlling for pain intensity, girls used social support seeking more than boys, while boys used more behavioral distraction techniques. Adolescents engaged in more positive self-statements (a cognitive strategy) than children. Both boys and girls showed a trend toward pain coping efficacy being negatively correlated with average pain intensity. For girls, pain coping efficacy was also significantly negatively correlated with internalizing/catastrophizing. However, no sex or age differences in coping efficacy were found. This study demonstrates the early emergence of sex- and aged-based preferences in coping strategies among children and adolescents with chronic pain. The findings establish a basis for further research on early social influences in the development of pain coping styles in males and females. Implications for further clinical research in this area are discussed.     

Spousal responses are differentially associated with clinical variables in women and men with chronic pain

OBJECTIVES: Spousal responses have been related to clinical variables in patients with chronic pain. For example, solicitous responses from spouses have been associated with greater levels of pain and disability among patients with chronic pain. However, few investigators have determined whether spousal solicitousness produces different effects in women versus men with chronic pain. The present study examined pain reports, medication use, psychosocial factors, functional measures, and pain tolerance in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Subjects included 114 female and 213 male chronic pain patients, who described their spouses as either high or low in solicitousness on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Measures of pain severity, affective distress, physical function, medication use, and pain tolerance were examined in women and men with high versus low scores on spousal solicitousness. RESULTS: Among males only, high spousal solicitousness was associated with greater numerical ratings of pain and greater self-reported disability compared with patients with low solicitous spouses. Among females only, the high spousal solicitousness patients showed lower pain tolerance, greater pain-related interference, poorer performance on functional tasks (eg, timed walking, lifting, and carrying tasks), and greater use of opioid medications. In both women and men, spousal solicitousness was associated with higher scores on the MPI pain severity scale. DISCUSSION: These results extend previous findings demonstrating a relationship between spousal responses and patients' adjustment to pain; however, the pattern of these effects appears to be moderated by the sex of the patient. Implications for assessment and treatment of chronic pain are discussed.     

Spinal cord injury pain: the influence of psychologic factors and impact on quality of life

OBJECTIVES: To examine chronic pain prevalence in a spinal cord injury (SCI) population, and to determine the influence of psychologic factors on SCI pain and impact of SCI pain on quality of life. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-five persons with SCI were asked to participate in the study. Demographic, SCI, and pain characteristics were obtained. The Chronic Pain Grade, anger items of the Profile of Mood States, Illness Cognition Questionnaire, Pain Coping and Cognition List, and Patient Health Questionnaire were used. General health and well-being were assessed with 0-10 scales. The influence of psychologic factors was assessed with regression analyses controlling for person and injury characteristics and pain intensity. RESULTS: Response rate was 49%. SCI pain prevalence was high (77.1%). More internal pain control and coping, less catastrophizing, higher level of lesion, and nontraumatic SCI cause were associated with less pain intensity. More pain was associated with higher pain-related disability. Lower catastrophizing was related to better health. Less SCI helplessness and catastrophizing, greater SCI acceptance and lower anger levels were related to higher well-being. Higher levels of SCI helplessness, catastrophizing, and anger were related to higher depression levels. Pain intensity showed no independent relationships with health, well-being, and depression in the regression analyses. DISCUSSION: Chronic SCI pain and quality of life were both largely associated with several psychologic factors of which pain catastrophizing and SCI helplessness were most important. Psychologic intervention programs may be useful for persons suffering from chronic SCI pain to improve their quality of life.     

Gender,coping and the perception of pain

Research consistently indicates that gender differences exist in pain perception, with females typically reporting more negative responses to pain than males. It also seems as if males and females use and benefit from different coping strategies when under stress; females seem to prefer emotion-focused coping, whereas males prefer sensory-focused coping. Unfortunately, experimental research that examines such differences in the context of pain has not yet been adequately investigated. The aim of the current study was, therefore, to determine whether gender differences would be found in the effect that sensory-focused and emotion-focused coping instructions have on cold pressor pain experiences. Participants consisted of 24 male and 26 female healthy adults, all of whom reported no current pain. A consistent pattern of effects was found, over both behavioural and self-report measures of pain. Compared to females, males exhibited less negative pain responses when focusing on the sensory component of pain (i.e. increased threshold, tolerance and lower sensory pain). Furthermore, compared to sensory focusing, emotional focusing was found to increase the affective pain experience of females. Together these results confirm that important differences exist between men and women in the effects pain coping instructions have on the experience of pain. The implications of such findings for research and practice are discussed.     

Coping strategies of patients with lung cancer-related pain.

Previous findings in patients with nonmalignant pain indicate a relationship between pain coping strategies and psychological factors. Although coping strategies have been explored in patients with cancer pain, relationships with such factors have not been reported. We wished to examine relationships between selected pain and psychological variables and the use of pain coping strategies. Forty-five patients with pain related to lung cancer indicated how they expressed their pain to others and completed the McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale of pain intensity, and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Forty-two percent of the patients reported that they tried not to let others know they had pain, and 40% indicated they told others when they had pain. Preferences for not telling others was associated with more frequent pain coping attempts for all CSQ subscales but those of catastrophizing and reinterpreting pain sensation. State anxiety demonstrated positive correlation with catastrophizing coping strategies (r = 0.48) and negative correlation with ability to control (r = -0.50) and decrease (r = -0.50) pain. The number of pain sites was correlated with coping self-statements (r = 0.34). Pain intensity and state anxiety demonstrated similar relationships. Pain quality as measured with the MPQ demonstrated moderately strong correlation with diverting attention, praying and hoping, catastrophizing, and increased activity. Interventions aimed at reinforcing or expanding a patient's pain coping repertoire should be developed with consideration given to the patient's anxiety level, pain intensity, pain quality, and pain expression preference.     

Pain tolerance as a predictor of outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: differential effects as a function of sex

Sex-related differences in the experience of clinical and experimental pain have been widely reported. Females are at elevated risk for developing several chronic pain conditions and women demonstrate greater sensitivity to noxious stimulation in the laboratory. However, relationships between responses to experimental noxious stimuli and the experience of clinical pain have not been well characterized. One previous study of healthy adults indicated that pain threshold and tolerance were associated with clinical pain among women but not men (i.e. females with lower pain threshold and tolerance reported more clinical pain). In the present investigation, relationships between pain tolerance and outcomes of treatment for chronic pain were evaluated in a sex-dependent manner. Ischemic pain tolerance was assessed prior to treatment in 171 chronic pain patients completing a pain management program. Outcomes were measured as changes in pain severity, affect, and pain-related disability. Over the course of treatment, women demonstrated greater improvement in pain-related disability while men showed more reduction in pain. Ischemic pain tolerance was related to outcome in a sex-specific fashion. Women with higher pain tolerances showed greater improvement in pain, more reduction in pain-related interference, and more increases in activity level than women with lower pain tolerances. In contrast, pain tolerance was not associated with positive treatment outcomes among men. These results indicate that experimental pain responses may be most clinically relevant for women, and that sex differences may exist in the determinants of pain-treatment outcomes.     

Gender differences in pain and depressive tendency among Chinese elders with knee osteoarthritis

The purpose of this study was to explore gender differences in pain experiences, pain control beliefs, pain coping strategies, and depressive tendency among Chinese elderly with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Participants (N=199) were drawn from a previous convenience sample of outpatients with OA in Taiwan. Results indicated female elders tended to report higher scores on least pain, current pain and overall pain intensity than male elders (all p<0.01). Female elders also reported significantly greater pain disturbance than males across each item and for the overall score, except for walking. Males and females did not differ significantly in scores for pain control beliefs or for either pharmacological or non-pharmacological coping strategies. In addition, female elders tended to have greater depressive tendency than males. Results of regression analyses suggest that depressive tendency was a mediator of gender in predicting overall pain intensity and pain disturbance. In summary, this sample of elders showed gender differences in depressive tendency and some pain experiences but not in pain control beliefs and coping strategies. These results suggest that health care providers should be cautious about using gender differences to explain pain experiences among Chinese elders. In addition, health care providers may decrease these female patients' pain intensity and pain disturbance by treating depressive symptoms.     

Gender differences in post-operative pain and patient controlled analgesia use among adolescent surgical patients

The aim of this study was to explore gender differences in anticipatory emotional distress, coping strategies, post-operative pain perception, and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use among adolescent surgical patients. One hundred and two 12-18-year-old adolescents undergoing surgeries with overnight hospital stay were recruited. Participants completed pre-operative measures of anxiety and anticipated pain. Post-operatively, they reported on coping skills, post-operative anxiety, and pain. Data on PCA use were recorded from medical records. Girls reported higher levels of pre-operative state anxiety and anticipated more pain. After surgery, girls and boys differed on their lowest daily pain ratings and average daily pain ratings, with girls reporting more pain in both cases. Reports of highest daily pain were similar across genders. Gender was found to moderate the relationship between anticipatory distress and post-operative pain, such that higher anticipatory distress before surgery predicted more post-operative pain for girls, but not for boys. Patterns of PCA use did not vary by gender on post-operative days 0 or 1. Findings suggest that adolescent boys' and girls' pain experiences are different in several important respects, although somewhat less divergent than has been reported in samples of adult males and females. Results have implications for the development of targeted intervention strategies to help adolescents cope effectively with acute post-operative pain.     

Sex Differences in Pain and Psychological Functioning in Persons With Limb Loss

Sex differences in pain are frequently reported in the literature. However, less is known about possible sex differences in the experience of pain secondary to a disability. The current study explored these issues in persons with limb loss (n = 335, 72% men) who were recruited as part of a postal survey. Participants provided ratings of phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), and general pain intensity. Participants also completed measures of pain-related interference, catastrophizing, coping, and beliefs. Results indicated that a greater proportion of males than females (86% vs 77%, respectively) reported the presence of PLP; however, this difference was no longer prominent when cause of limb loss was controlled. No sex differences were found in the presence of RLP, or in average intensity ratings of PLP or RLP. In contrast, females reported greater overall average pain intensity and interference than males. Females also endorsed significantly greater catastrophizing, use of certain pain-coping strategies, and beliefs related to several aspects of pain. This study did not find prominent sex differences in pain specific to limb loss. However, several sex differences in the overall biopsychosocial experience of pain did emerge that are consistent with the broader literature.PerspectiveThe current study contributes to the literature on sex differences in the experience of pain. Although males and females with limb loss did not significantly differ in their disability-specific pain, sex differences in their broader experience of pain were significant and are worthy of future clinical and empirical attention.     

Sex differences in adolescent chronic pain and pain-related coping

Sex differences exist in pain and the strategies used to cope with pain. Although it is has been proposed that such differences become apparent around puberty, somewhat surprisingly very little research has specifically investigated sex as a moderator of pain within adolescents. The primary aim of the current study was to investigate sex differences in pain and coping within a group of 46 male and 115 female adolescent chronic pain sufferers. All were aged between 11 and 19 years and had been referred to the Pain Management Unit at the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, United Kingdom. Patients completed a battery of measures including pain experiences and a pain coping questionnaire. No sex differences were found in pain chronicity, although males and females did differ in self-reported pain experiences (females reported higher pain). Sex differences were also found in coping behaviours. Females used more social support, positive statements and internalizing/catastrophizing, whereas males reported engaging in more behavioural distraction. Of these strategies internalizing/catastrophizing was found to mediate the relationship between sex and pain. This suggests that not only do sex differences exist in the pain experiences and pain-coping strategies of adolescents with chronic pain, but that internalizing/catastrophizing may be an important mechanism in understanding such differences. More research examining potential sex differences in children and adolescents is recommended.     

Heart rate mediation of sex differences in pain tolerance in children

Despite evidence supporting the existence of important sex-related differences in pain, the mechanisms underpinning such differences are not well understood. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between sex and pubertal differences in autonomic arousal and pain tolerance to laboratory pain stimuli in healthy children. We tested the following specific hypotheses: (1) females would have greater autonomic arousal and less pain tolerance than males, and (2) this sex difference in pain tolerance would be mediated by autonomic arousal. Participants were 244 healthy children (50.8% female, mean age 12.73+/-2.98 years, range 8-18 years). Separate 4-trial blocks of cutaneous pressure and thermal pain stimuli were presented in counterbalanced order. Heart rate (HR) was recorded during 2-3 min periods preceding each block and a 1-min period between trials. Results indicated lower tolerance in females for cutaneous pressure, but not thermal pain, compared to males. In addition, pre-trial HR was greater for females than males. Mediation analyses suggested that sex differences in pressure pain tolerance were accounted for by sex differences in pre-trial HR. There were also significant effects for puberty, but these did not vary by sex. Overall, early pubertal children had greater pre-trial HR and less pain tolerance than those in late puberty for both cutaneous pressure and thermal pain across sex. These results suggest that autonomic arousal may be a mediator of sex-related differences in pain responses in children.     

Fear of movement (kinesiophobia), pain, and psychopathology in patients with sickle cell disease

OBJECTIVES: Fear of movement (ie, kinesiophobia) has emerged as a significant predictor of pain-related outcomes including disability and psychologic distress across various types of pain (eg, back pain, headache, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome). However, no research has examined the prevalence of kinesiophobia in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of kinesiophobia reported by African American men and women with SCD and to determine whether kinesiophobia is related to pain and psychologic distress in this population. METHODS: Sixty-seven men and women with SCD recruited from a comprehensive sickle cell treatment program in a large academic medical center completed questionnaires that assess fear of movement, pain and pain interference, and psychologic distress. RESULTS: Participants reported levels of kinesiophobia (M=30.48, SD=7.55) that were comparable to those obtained for patients with low back pain and fibromyalgia. Although pain levels did not differ by sex, men reported greater kinesiophobia than women (P=0.02). As hypothesized, higher levels of kinesiophobia were associated with greater psychologic distress, particularly Phobic Anxiety (r=0.35), Psychoticism (r=0.29), Somatization (r=0.45), Anxiety (r=0.35), Obsessive-compulsive (r=0.34), Interpersonal Sensitivity (r=0.25), Depression (r=0.29), and all 3 summary indices of the SCL-90-R (all Ps<0.05). DISCUSSION: Although and historically, pain associated with SCD has not been considered in the context of fear of movement, findings suggest that both kinesiophobia and sex are relevant constructs for consideration in understanding pain-related outcomes in SCD. Though our results require replication, this study suggests that greater kinesiophobia is associated with greater pain and psychologic distress.