局部灌注沙培林和羟基喜树碱治疗恶性胸腔积液

[目的]观察沙培林(0K-432)和羟基喜树碱(HCPT)治疗恶性胸腔积液的近期临床疗效。[方法]对62例恶性胸腔积液患者采用胸腔置入贝朗可分裂中心静脉管持续引流，胸腔积液排放完后，给予沙培林5KE胸腔内注入，dl，HCPT30mg胸腔内注入，d2，每周2次，观察临床疗效与不良反应。[结果]沙培林与HCPT联合治疗恶性胸腔积液总有效率为88．7％，主要不良反应为发热和骨髓抑制。[结论]胸穿置管引流局部灌注沙培林和羟基喜树碱治疗恶性胸积液有较好的近期临床疗效，毒副反应可以耐受。     

沙培林与顺铂治疗恶性心包积液的近期疗效

［目的］观察沙培林(OK-４３２)及顺铂治疗恶性心包积液的近期疗效和耐受性。［方法］５６例中等及大量恶性心包积液患者心包穿刺置管引流后腔内随机分组注射，沙培林组(生理盐水２０ml＋OK-４３２２KE＋地塞米松１０mg／次)３０例，顺铂组(生理盐水４０ml＋顺铂５０mg～６０mg／次)２６例，腔内用药最多重复３次。［结果］沙培林组有效率为９３．３％。主要不良反应为发热；顺铂组有效率为６５．４％，主要不良反应为骨髓抑制及胃肠道反应，两组有效率及不良反应均有显著差异(P＜０．０５)。［结论］沙培林治疗恶性心包积液沙培林有效率高，不良反应小，患者耐受性好，值得临床推广应用。     

胸壁、纵隔（050791～050800）

川芎嗪对胸部肿瘤放射治疗后肺损伤的干预作用；小切口下缝合器在胸部肿瘤外科中的应用；胸腹腔置微管引流并药物注入治疗恶性胸腹水；微创中心静脉导管留置治疗恶性胸腔积液34例观察；沙培林联合丝裂霉素一次性治疗恶性胸腔积液；胸部肿瘤切除术后并发心房纤颤42例分析；     

沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床研究

观察沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效及副作用。对 30例恶性胸腔积液患者应用沙培林腔内给药治疗 ,B超检查 ,观察效果。有效率达 66 7% ,不良反应主要是胸痛和发热。沙培林是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效药物之一。     

顺铂联合沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液临床观察

目的　探讨顺铂联合沙培林胸腔内局部应用治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。方法　 5 2例恶性肿瘤合并胸腔积液患者分为顺铂 沙培林组和顺铂组 ,采取胸腔内局部用药。结果　顺铂 沙培林组对恶性胸腔积液的有效率为 88 9% ,明显高于顺铂组有效率 (P <0 0 1)。结论　顺铂联合沙培林胸腔内部应用是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效方法。     

康莱特联合沙培林治疗老年恶性胸腔积液的临床观察

目的 观察康莱特联合沙培林治疗老年恶性胸腔积液的近期疗效、生活质量提高情况.方法 56例诊断为肺癌恶性胸腔积液的老年患者随机分组,治疗组28例应用康莱特的同时给予沙培林胸腔灌注治疗,对照组28例仅用沙培林胸腔灌注治疗,4周后观察疗效.结果 有效率(CR PR)治疗组为89.3%,对照组为85.7%,治疗组疾病控制率高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义,而治疗组较对照组的生活质量明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P相似文献   

顺铂联合甘露聚糖肽与联合OK-432胸腔注射治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床分析

[目的]对比观察中心静脉导管胸腔引流并顺铂联合甘露聚糖肽（多抗）或OK-432（沙培林）治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效和毒副反应。[方法]99例恶性胸腔积液病人，随机分为2组：甘露聚糖肽组（A组）53例，OK432组（B组）46例。行中心静脉导管胸腔引流术，A组胸腔注射甘露聚糖肽和顺铂，B组胸腔注射0K432和顺铂。两组均每周重复，连续2～4周。[结果]A组RR43例（81．1％）。B组RR39例（84．8％），两组有效率无统计学差异（P=0．631）。A组有3例（5．7％）病人发热，B组有24例（52．2％）病人发热（P〈0．001）。[结论]中心静脉导管胸腔引流并顺铂联合甘露聚糖肽或OK432治疗恶性胸腔积液均较安全且方便，临床疗效相似，但沙培林组发热的发生率远高于甘露聚糖肽组。     

沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床研究

观察沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效及副作用。对30例恶性胸腔积液患者应用沙培林腔内给药治疗，B超检查，观察效果。有效率达66．7％，不良反应主要是胸痛和发热。沙培林是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效药物之一。     

沙培林治疗36例恶性胸腔积液临床疗效观察

目的 :观察沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。方法 :经B超定位并行胸穿抽取胸腔积液 ,2周内隔日 1次注入不同剂量的沙培林。结果 :36例患者有效率 91 7% ,中位缓解期 8 5个月 ,中位生存期 11个月。主要毒副反应为不同程度发热。结论 :沙培林能有效治疗恶性胸腔积液     

顺铂联合沙培林治疗恶性胸腔积液临床观察

目的 探讨顺铂联合沙培林胸腔内局部应用治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效。方法 52例恶性肿瘤合并胸腔积液患分为顺铂＋沙培林组和顺铂组，采取胸腔内局部用药。结果 顺铂＋沙培林组对恶性胸腔积液的有效率为88．9％，明显高于顺铂组有效率（P＜0．01）。结论 顺铂联合沙培林胸腔内部应用是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效方法。     

供体淋巴细胞注射治疗恶性浆膜腔积液的临床研究

 目的 观察供体淋巴细胞注射治疗恶性浆膜腔积液的疗效及毒副作用。方法 首先最大限度地排净浆膜腔积液，然后将采集的供体淋巴细胞经穿刺直接注入浆膜腔内。结果 9例恶性浆膜腔积液患者中，显效5例，部分有效4例，总有效率100 %。主要不良反应为发热和胸痛。结论 供体淋巴细胞注射治疗恶性浆膜腔积液的疗效肯定，不良反应轻。     

Intrathoracic infusion with a combination of low-dose minocycline, OK-432 and cisplatin for malignant pleural effusion

We investigated the effectiveness and complications of intrathoracic infusion with a combination of cisplatin, OK-432, and minocycline for malignant pleural effusion. All patients were hospitalized with chest tube drainage of pleural effusion until the daily drainage volume was less than 100 ml. Twenty-five mg of minocycline, 1 to 3 KE of OK-432, and 5 to 10 mg of cisplatin were instilled into the pleural space. The administration was repeated until drainage effusion disappeared. Therapeutic effect was evaluated according to the following criteria: (1) excellent, no fluid reaccumulation for at least 4 weeks as determined by chest radiogram and clinical evaluation; (2) effective, fluid reaccumulation less than 50% of original effusion with no need of thoracentesis for symptomatic relief within 4 weeks after treatment; and (3) failure, reaccumulation of more than 50% of the original effusion requiring thoracentesis to relieve symptoms within 4 weeks of treatment. Twelve patients with malignant effusion received the combination treatment; 11 patients had primary lung cancer and one had metastatic lung tumor from cancer of the rectum. In all cases, the histology or cytology revealed adenocarcinoma. Eleven of the 12 patients had an excellent response with relief of clinical symptoms. The remaining case failed to show any improvement. Complications such as local pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were mild and transient. We conclude that combination administration of low-dose minocycline, OK-432, and cisplatin into the thoracic cavity for malignant effusion is an effective alternative treatment with the potential for improvement of the general condition and reduced morbidity.     

Comparison of OK-432 and mitomycin C pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer. A randomized trial.

A prospective randomized study to compare the effectiveness of pleurodesis by two new sclerosing agents: OK-432 and mitomycin C were conducted in 53 patients with malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer. None of the patients received concomitant systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy during the study. After complete drainage of pleural fluid, the patients were allocated randomly to receive 10 Klinische Einheit units of OK-432 or 8 mg of mitomycin C by intrapleural injection at weekly intervals. The treatment was terminated if the pleural effusion disappeared or the patients had received four consecutive procedures. There were 26 patients who received pleurodesis with OK-432 and 27, with mitomycin C. Patient characteristics in the two treatment groups (age, sex, histologic type, performance status, and prior treatment before pleurodesis) were compatible. These results showed that pleurodesis with OK-432 achieved a higher complete response rate (73%) than that of mitomycin C (41%). The rates of objective treatment response (complete response plus partial response) were comparable in both groups (88% for OK-432 and 67% for mitomycin C). The average number of intrapleural injections needed to achieve complete response was fewer in the OK-432 group (1.9 +/- 0.9) than in mitomycin C group (2.8 +/- 0.9). There was no significant difference in the median survival of the patients who received pleurodesis with OK-432 (5.8 months) or mitomycin C (5.1 months). However, the effusion-free period in the OK-432 group was significantly longer than that in the mitomycin C group (7.0 months versus 1.5 months). Patients who underwent OK-432 pleurodesis had a higher complication rate (80%) than did those in the mitomycin C group (30%). Transient febrile reaction was the most common reaction encountered. The immunologic study in OK-432 group showed an increase in peripheral leukocyte count and decrease in the OKT4/OKT8 ratio. The mitomycin C group had a mild reduction in peripheral blood leukocyte count and no significant change in the OKT4/OKT8 ratio. It was concluded that pleurodesis with OK-432 is an effective alternative treatment for malignant effusion in patients with lung cancer.     

沙培林联合羟基喜树碱腔内给药治疗恶性胸腔积液

目的：为观察沙培林联合羟基喜树碱腔内给药治疗恶腔积液患的治疗。方法：60例恶性胸腔积液患采用胸腔穿刺，使用比利时生产的贝朗可分裂中心静脉导管置入胸腔、接负压瓶持续闭式引流排胸液。并随机分成两组，治疗组采用沙培林联合羟基喜树碱治疗（30例），第一周2次，每隔3天一次，由引流管注入生理盐40ml加羟基喜树碱30mg，第2周连续3天注入沙培林5KE/次、10KE/次、10KE/次，对照组单用羟基喜树碱治疗（30例），每一周2次，每隔3天一次，由引流管注入生理盐水40ml加羟基喜树碱30mg。结果：治疗组有效率90%[CR11例（37%） PR16例（53%）]，对照组有效率67%[CR8例（27%） PR12例（40例）]。经论：沙培林联合羟基喜树碱腔内注射治疗恶性胸腔积液优于单用羟基喜树碱，而胸腔穿刺置管引流创伤轻微，无倒流污染，引流通畅彻底，避免胸膜多房性包裹粘连的形成以至带来后续治疗困难，可防止医源性感染及气胸等并发症。     

香菇多糖联合顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液

目的：观察香菇多糖联合顺铂胸腔灌注与单用顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效性和安全性。方法：收治恶性胸腔积液患者７３例,香菇多糖联合顺铂组（Ａ组）３８例,单用顺铂组（Ｂ组）３５例。用一次性中心静脉导管行胸腔置管和闭式引流胸液,Ａ组胸腔给药：香菇多糖４ｍｇ＋生理盐水２０ｍｌ,顺铂４０ｍｇ／ｍ２＋生理盐水５０ｍｌ;Ｂ组胸腔给药：顺铂４０ｍｇ／ｍ２＋生理盐水５０ｍｌ。结果：Ａ组患者总有效率和生活质量改善率均优于Ｂ组（Ｐ＜０.０５）,两组毒副反应相近。结论：胸腔闭式引流后灌注香菇多糖联用顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效优于单用顺铂,且毒副反应轻微。     

紫杉醇局部注射治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床观察

目的：观察胸腔内注射紫杉醇治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效与毒副反应。方法：经病理组织学或胸水细胞学确诊为恶性胸腔积液的患者３９例,分为紫杉醇（ＰＴＸ）组１９例,胸腔内注射生理盐水５０ｍｌ＋ＰＴＸ１２０ｍｇ＋地塞米松１０ｍｇ;顺铂（ＰＤＤ）组２０例,胸腔内注射生理盐水５０ｍｌ＋ＰＤＤ６０ｍｇ＋地塞米松１０ｍｇ。均为每周１次,共２次。观察疗效与毒副反应。结果：ＰＴＸ组与ＰＤＤ组总有效率（ＣＲ＋ＰＲ）分别为７８.９％与６０.０％,差异有显著性（Ｐ＜０.０５）;治疗后毒副反应,出现发热、胸痛以ＰＴＸ组明显（Ｐ＜０.０５）,而血液学毒性两组比较无差异（Ｐ＞０.０５）。结论：紫杉醇胸腔内注射治疗恶性胸腔积液疗效显著,毒副反应能耐受,但能否作为一线用药,还有待进一步探讨。     

A preliminary report on the treatment of pleural carcinomatosis with SMANCS

To clarify the effect of SMANCS on malignant pleural carcinomatosis, seven patients with malignant pleural effusion were treated with SMANCS administered via an intracavitary route. Five patients showed improvement after one or two injections of SMANCS into the thoracic cavity, although 2 patients needed further therapy with the immunopotentiating agent picibanil (OK-432). No serious adverse effects were observed. This simple therapeutic tactic with SMANCS may be effective in cases of malignant pleural carcinomatosis.     

亚砷酸胸腔注射治疗恶性胸腔积液

目的:评价亚砷酸胸腔注射治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床价值。方法:恶性胸腔积液患者68例,均经细胞学和病理学确诊,随机分为治疗组和对照组:在胸膜腔积液充分引流后,治疗组36例,胸膜腔内注射亚砷酸10mg~20mg,每天或隔日1次,连续3次;对照组32例,胸膜腔内注射博莱霉素30mg/m2,7天1次,共1~2次。观察疗效、毒副反应、生活质量。结果:治疗组CR10例(28%),PR16例(44%),总有效率为26/36(72%);对照组CR8例(36%),PR13例(45%),总有效率为21/32(65%),两组有效率差异无显著性(P>0.05)。治疗组注药后胸痛反应明显低于对照组(P<0.05),胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制、发热反应两组间无明显差异(P>0.05)。治疗后两组KPS评分均有增加,治疗前后比较有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论:亚砷酸胸腔注射治疗恶性胸腔积液是一种有效、安全的方法。     

体腔热灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腹腔积液临床研究

目的：研究体腔热灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腹腔积液的疗效与不良反应。方法：67例恶性胸腹腔积液患者分为治疗组（35例）和对照组（32例）。胸腹腔穿刺行闭式引流干净胸腹腔积液后,治疗组给予5-氟尿嘧啶1000mg加上43℃-45℃的生理盐水,胸腔积液患者需2000ml-2500ml生理盐水;腹腔积液患者需2500ml-3000 ml生理盐水,以HGGZ-102体腔热灌注治疗系统注入胸腹腔,使进入胸腹腔的液体温度维持在41℃-43℃,循环2h;对照组给予生理盐水100ml＋5-氟尿嘧啶1000mg胸腹腔注入。两组均每周灌注1次,连续灌注3周,评定疗效。结果：治疗组有效率88.6%,Karnofsky评分增加率85.7%;对照组有效率62.5%,Karnofsky评分增加率59.4%。治疗组胸腹腔积液控制率、Karnofsky评分增加率均优于对照组（P〈0.05）。两组不良反应无明显差异。两组生存期无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。结论：体腔热灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腹水近期疗效好且安全。