High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20-year experience.

Retrospective analysis was performed on 1022 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix who were treated with high-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary irradiation at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Angawa, Chiba-shi, Japan, from 1968 to 1982 in comparison with low-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy. The patient population consisted of 147 patients with Stage I disease, 256 patients with Stage II disease, 515 patients with Stage III disease, and 104 patients with Stage IV disease. Absolute 5-year survival rates for Stages Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIb, IVa, and IVb disease were 88.1%, 76.9%, 67.0%, 52.2%, 24.1%, and 13.3%, respectively. The rates of severe complication of Grades 3 and 4 were 4.1% for the rectosigmoid colon, 1.2% for the bladder, and 1.1% for the small intestine. In the case of Stage I to II disease, the optimal dose from intracavitary sources was suggested to be 2900 cGy +/- 200 cGy at point A, with 4 to 5 fractions of 600 to 700 cGy delivered over 4 to 5 weeks. These results suggested that high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy provided clinical results comparable to those of a low-dose-rate technique.     

Clinical results of radiation therapy for stage I esophageal cancer: a single institutional experience

From 1992 through 2001, 29 patients with stage I esophageal cancer were treated with radiation therapy. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Seventeen patients were treated with radiotherapy alone, and 12 were treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Most of the chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Twelve patients were treated with intracavitary irradiation (low-dose rate: 6, high-dose rate: 6) after external radiotherapy. Median fraction and total doses of external radiotherapy given were 2.0 Gy and 60.6 Gy, respectively. Median doses of intracavitary irradiation were 18 Gy/6 fractions in low-dose-rate brachytherapy and 13.5 Gy/4.5 fractions in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The 5-year overall survival rate was 62%. The 5-year local control rate was 44%. Of the 29 patients, 9 had in-field recurrence in the esophagus and 1 had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Of 9 patients with in-field local recurrence, 1 also developed mediastinal lymph node metastases and 1 had distant metastasis. Radiation therapy is an effective treatment modality for stage I esophageal cancer.     

Radiation therapy of esophageal cancer: role of high dose rate brachytherapy.

Fifty untreated cases of squamous cell carcinoma arising from the middle one-third of the esophagus, with no apparent extraesophageal spread on a computed tomography (CT) scan and with a Karnofsky performance status of over 70, were treated by external beam irradiation to a dose of 3500 cGy/15 fractions/3 weeks. Twenty-five patients (Group A) received treatment with further external beam irradiation to a dose of 2000 cGy/10 fractions/2 weeks. Another group of 25 patients (Group B) received treatment with high dose rate intracavitary irradiation to a dose of 1200 cGy delivered in two sessions of 600 cGy each a week apart. All patients were assessed symptomatically, endoscopically, and radiologically every 3 months. There was marked difference at the end of 1 year in relief of dysphagia (37.5% in Group A vs. 70.6% in Group B), local control (25% in group A vs. 70.6% in group B) although the results were statistically insignificant (p greater than 0.05) and actuarial survival (44% in group A vs. 78% in group B) which was, however, significant statistically (z = 2.83). The cumulative radiation effect (CRE) by external beam irradiation was 1729 reu and by external beam and intracavitary irradiation 1741 reu, but the biological dose effect was better with external beam and intracavitary irradiation. Eight percent of patients treated by external beam and intracavitary irradiation had strictures in contrast to 4% treated by external beam irradiation alone. Moderate doses of external beam and intracavitary irradiation can give a better local response than external beam irradiation alone for the same biological dose in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.     

Radiotherapy alone for medically inoperable carcinoma of the cervix: stage IA and carcinoma in situ

The objective of this study was to define the role of radiotherapy alone for medically inoperable patients with Carcinoma in Situ (CIS) and Stage IA carcinoma of the uterine cervix. At the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Radiation Oncology Center from January 1959 through December 1986 21 patients with CIS and 34 with Stage IA were treated. All patients had histologically proven disease. The average age was 56 years for CIS and 51 years for Stage IA patients. Therapy for patients with CIS consisted of a single intracavitary insertion with a uterine tandem and colpostats. The average radiation doses were 4612 cGy to point A, 9541 cGy to the surface of the cervix, and 5123 milligram-hours (mgh). Radiotherapy for Stage IA tumors was delivered with intracavitary irradiation alone in 13 (average doses were 5571 cGy to point A, 10,430 cGy vaginal surface dose, and 6488 mgh). The other 21 patients were treated with external beam and intracavitary irradiation. The average whole pelvis dose was 1443 cGy with an additional 2354 cGy boost to the parametria with a midline stepwedge shield. The average intracavitary doses were 5200 cGy to point A, 10234 cGy to the vaginal surface, and 6293 mgh. None of the patients with CIS developed recurrent disease and none had severe sequelae of therapy. Only one patient with Stage IA developed recurrent disease in the pelvis. None developed metastatic disease. The severe complication rate was 5.9% (2/34) for Stage IA and only occurred in those receiving intracavitary irradiation and external beam irradiation. We conclude that irradiation consisting of intracavitary implants alone is excellent treatment for patients with medically inoperable Stage IA and CIS of the cervix.     

Analysis of pelvic tumor control and impact on survival in carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiation therapy alone

A total of 1054 patients with histologically confirmed invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated with radiation therapy alone between 1959 and 1982. All patients are available for a minimum of 3 years follow-up. Radiation therapy consisted of external irradiation to the whole pelvis (1000-2000 cGy) and parametria (for a total of 4000-6000 cGy) combined with two intracavitary radioactive source insertions (6000-7500 cGy to point A). Patients with Stage IIB, III, and IVA have been consistently treated with somewhat higher doses of external irradiation and intracavitary insertions. A small group of 54 patients with Stage IIB or IIIB had pelvic lymphadenectomy following the irradiation (1960-1964). There was a strong correlation between the tumor regression within 30 days from completion of radiotherapy and the incidence of pelvic recurrences or distant metastases for each of the anatomical stages. The 10-year survival rate for Stage IB was 76%, Stage IIA 60%, Stage IIB 45%, and Stage III 25%. Many of the deaths were due to intercurrent disease. Thus, the 10-year tumor-free survival was 80% for Stage IB, 60% for Stages IIA and IIB and 35% for Stage III. In Stage IB total doses of 6000 cGy or higher to point A resulted in 94% pelvic tumor control. In Stage IIA, the pelvic tumor control was 87% with doses of 6000 cGy to point A or higher. However, in Stage IIB the pelvic tumor control was 58% with doses below 6000 cGy, 78% with 6001-7500 cGy and 82% with higher doses. In Stage IIIB the pelvic tumor control was 42% with doses below 6000 cGy, 57% with 6001-7500 cGy and 68% with higher doses. Tumor control in the pelvis was correlated with the following 5 year survivals: Stage IB-95% (353 patients); Stage IIA-84% (116 patients); Stage IIB-84% (308 patients); Stage IIIB-74% (245 patients). The 5-year survival for patients that recurred in the pelvis was 30% for Stage IB, about 15% for Stages IIA-B and only 5% in Stage III. Patients with tumor control in the pelvis had a significantly lower incidence of distant metastases than patients who initially failed in the pelvis (9.3% vs. 58.6% in Stage IB, 21.6% vs 52.6% in Stage IIA, 19.8% vs 16.7% in Stage IIB, and 31.2% vs 50% in Stage III). In Stage IIB the figures were 19.8% and 16.7% because the initial pelvic recurrence was frequently concurrent with distant metastases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The importance of brachytherapy technique in the management of primary carcinoma of the vagina.

This retrospective analysis of 49 cases of primary carcinoma of the vagina treated with radiation therapy alone from 1970-1988 examines the results of treatment with an emphasis on the importance of brachytherapy technique. Thirty-six patients were treated with combined external beam radiation and brachytherapy, 11 patients were treated with external beam alone, and two patients were treated with brachytherapy alone. Brachytherapy techniques used included intracavitary implants, temporary Ir-192 interstitial implants, and permanent I-125 interstitial implants. Intracavitary therapy included the use of a fractionated high dose rate intravaginal cylinder, tandem and ovoids, and a low dose rate intravaginal cylinder. The 5-year actuarial survival was 44% for Stage I (six patients), 48% for Stage II (27 patients), 40% for Stage III (10 patients), and 0% for Stage IVa and IVb (six patients). There was a significant increase in the 5-year actuarial survival for those patients who had brachytherapy as part of their treatment compared to those patients treated with external beam alone (50% vs. 9%) (p < .001). For Stages II and III, there was a trend toward improved actuarial and crude disease free survival with the use of a temporary Ir-192 interstitial implant as part of the treatment compared to the use of intracavitary brachytherapy as part of the treatment (80% vs. 45%) (p = 0.25) and (75% vs. 44%) (p = 0.08), respectively. Brachytherapy plays an important role in the management of primary vaginal cancer. A temporary interstitial implant should be used over an intracavitary form of therapy for more invasive disease.     

Vaginal recurrences of endometrial carcinoma: the prognostic value of staging by a primary vaginal carcinoma system

Fifty-five of 1716 women with endometrial carcinoma seen consecutively at three institutions prior to 1986 were found to have an isolated post-hysterectomy vaginal recurrence. Their therapy included external radiation therapy (RT) and brachytherapy for 26 women, external RT alone for 17, brachytherapy only for 4, and no RT for 8. Combined external RT/brachytherapy doses ranged from 2000 to 10,000 cGy with a median of 6000 cGy. The 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates are 48% and 31% for the entire group, and the 3- and 5-year pelvic control rates are 52% and 42%. The 5-year survival and pelvic control rates for those who received greater than or equal to 6000 cGy in total RT dose are 47% and 68%, compared with 12% and 10% for those receiving less than 6000 cGy (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004). For patients receiving their second RT course, the 5-year survival rate is 16%, compared with 48% for those not previously irradiated. The Perez modification of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for primary vaginal carcinoma was applied to each recurrence. There were 15 Stage I cases (vaginal mucosa), 32 Stage II cases divided between 15 Stage IIA (subvaginal infiltration) and 17 in Stage IIB (parametrial infiltration), and 8 Stage III cases (pelvic wall involvement). The 3-year actuarial survival and pelvic control rates using this staging system are: Stage I: 85%/100%; Stage II: 41%/43%, Stage IIA: 59%/53%, Stage IIB: 26%/35%; Stage III: 13%/0%. These outcome endpoints are significantly better for Stage I than Stage II patients (p = 0.01 & 0.0004) and for Stages I and IIA compared to Stages IIB and III (p = 0.0005 & 0.002). The pre-treatment variables of age, interval since hysterectomy, initial stage, and location did not predict for survival, but a higher rate of pelvic control was observed for apical than for suburethral recurrences (56% vs. 20%). Grade III histology was highly correlated with poor survival (p = 0.0006). This vaginal carcinoma staging system appears to have value in predicting treatment outcome for patients with post-hysterectomy vaginal recurrences.     

Intracavitary radiation in the treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma: A comparison of high dose rate vs. low dose rate brachytherapy

Twenty-two patients were irradiated using two different dose schedules of intracavitary irradiation for palliation of locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus. Irradiation was given solely with either manually afterloaded low/Intermediate dose Cesium-137 (LDR) or high dose rate Iridium-192 (HDR) delivered via remote afterloader. This study was designed to test the effectiveness of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in the relief of dysphagia and the maintenance of esophageal patency and to compare with our previous experiences with LDR intracavitary brachytherapy. Accelerated treatments were especially suited for patients with poor physical condition or short life expectancy unlikely to complete a full course of external beam irradiation without treatment interruption. Two thousand cGY in three fractions of LDR was compared with 1,250 cGY in one fraction HDR with essentially equal results. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Factors affecting long-term outcome of irradiation in carcinoma of the vagina

OBJECTIVE: This report evaluates prognostic and technical factors affecting outcome of patients with primary carcinoma of the vagina treated with definitive radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on records of 212 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the vagina treated with irradiation. RESULTS: Tumor stage was the most significant prognostic factor; actuarial 10-year disease-free survival was 94% for Stage 0 (20 patients), 80% for Stage I (59 patients), 55% for Stage IIA (63 patients), 35% for Stage IIB (34 patients), 38% for Stage III (20 patients), and 0% for Stage IV (15 patients). All in situ lesions except one were controlled with intracavitary therapy. Of the patients with Stage I disease, 86% showed no evidence of vaginal or pelvic recurrence; most of them received interstitial or intracavitary therapy or both, and the addition of external-beam irradiation did not significantly increase survival or tumor control. In Stage IIA (paravaginal extension) and IIB (parametrial involvement) 66% and 56% of the tumors, respectively, were controlled with a combination of brachytherapy and external-beam irradiation; 13 of 20 (65%) Stage III tumors were controlled in the pelvis. Four patients with Stage IV disease (27%) had no recurrence in the pelvis. The total incidence of distant metastases was 13% in Stage I, 30% in Stage IIA, 52% in Stage IIB, 50% in Stage III, and 47% in Stage IV. The dose of irradiation delivered to the primary tumor or the parametrial extension was of relative importance in achieving successful results. In patients with Stage I disease, brachytherapy alone achieved the same local tumor control (80-100%) as in patients receiving external pelvic irradiation (78-100%) as well. In Stage II and III there was a trend toward better tumor control (57-80%) with combined external irradiation and brachytherapy than with the latter alone (33-50%) (p = 0.42). The incidence of grade 2-3 complications (12%) correlated with the stage of the tumor and type of treatment given. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for patients with vaginal carcinoma, particularly Stage I. More effective irradiation techniques, including optimization of dose distribution combining external irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy in tumors beyond Stage I, are necessary to enhance locoregional tumor control. The high incidence of distant metastases emphasizes the need for earlier diagnosis and effective systemic cytotoxic agents to improve survival in these patients.     

External radiation therapy of stage I cancer of the endometrium: a need for reappraisal of this adjunctive modality

One hundred and eighty-five patients with Stage I cancer of the endometrium were irradiated preoperatively. All were irradiated to the whole pelvis by external beam only using supermegavoltage apparati. The total mid-pelvis dose ranged from 4500 cGy/5 weeks to 5500 cGy/6 1/2 weeks. Surgery followed usually in 6 weeks. Complications were minimal. Disease-free survival at Stage IA was 92.4% 5-year, 87.7% 10-year; Stage IB was 83.5% 5-year, 74.6% 10-year. Prognosis was related to stage, grade, depth of myometrial penetration, the presence of "residual" tumor at hysterectomy. External beam preoperative irradiation is recommended for all Stage I patients; Stage IB with higher grade pathology should have intracavitary irradiation supplemental to the external irradiation.     

Patterns of radiotherapy practice for patients with squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: patterns of care study

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of research findings and evolving technology on the patterns of radiotherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-two radiation therapy facilities participated in the study after having been selected from a random sample, proportionally stratified according to practice type, of all United States facilities. Each facility submitted a list of patients treated during 1992-1994 with radiation for squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Cases for review were randomly selected from each institution after excluding those of patients who had distant metastases or initial hysterectomy. A total of 471 patients' records were reviewed in the treating institutions to obtain information about patients' characteristics, diagnostic evaluation, tumor extent, treatment approach, and radiotherapy techniques. RESULTS: Of the 61 facilities that treated eligible cases of intact cervical cancer during the 3-year survey period, 35 (57%) treated fewer than three eligible patients per year. Thirty-four (83%) of 41 non-academic facilities vs. 1 (5%) of 20 academic facilities treated fewer than three patients per year. FIGO stages were I, II, III, and IV in 32%, 40%, 24%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) was the most common method of lymph node evaluation, but surgical evaluation, which was performed in 76 (16%) patients, had increased from previous surveys. Fields were designed using a dedicated simulator in 95% of patients; a dedicated CT unit was used for treatment planning in 119 (30%) cases. External beam irradiation was most often given using a four-field technique at 180 cGy per day on a 10-20 MV linear accelerator. The average daily fraction size had decreased from previous surveys, and 13% of patients were treated with daily doses of 170 cGy or less. Most patients were treated with a combination of external beam and low dose-rate (LDR) intracavitary irradiation. Of 425 patients who had treatment with curative intent that included brachytherapy, 362 (85%) had LDR brachytherapy, 45 (11%) had high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, 3 had a combination of HDR and LDR, and 15 had incomplete information about the brachytherapy dose-rate. Forty-six (23%) of 197 patients with Stages I-IIA disease were treated with radiation followed by extrafascial hysterectomy. Of 111 patients treated with curative intent for Stage III-IV disease, 72 (65%) had a combination of external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy, 22 (20%) had external beam plus interstitial brachytherapy, and 17 (15%) were treated with external beam irradiation only. For patients who completed treatment with curative intent and did not have adjuvant hysterectomy or HDR brachytherapy, the median total dose at point A was 82.5 Gy. For all patients who completed treatment with radiation alone, the median total duration of treatment was 63 days; more than 70 days were taken to complete treatment in 33% of cases. Twenty-nine percent of patients received chemotherapy, usually concurrent with their radiation therapy. Only 27% of these patients were on investigational protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Greater participation in well-designed prospective trials might help clinicians address important clinical questions and reduce current inconsistencies in the use of adjuvant treatments. Radiation oncologists should take steps to avoid unnecessary treatment protraction and to improve patient compliance. Future studies will be needed to determine whether the small number of cases being treated in most nonacademic facilities will influence the outcome for patients with invasive cervical carcinoma.     

Adjuvant external beam therapy for pathologic stage I and occult stage II endometrial carcinoma

Eighty-six patients with pathologic Stage I or occult Stage II carcinoma of the endometrium and myometrial invasion and/or Grade 2 or Grade 3 histologic condition received whole-pelvis external radiation therapy (RT) after extrafascial total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Twenty-one patients received 4250 cGy in 25 daily fractions for 5 weeks (Group 1), 28 received 4500 cGy in 25 daily fractions for 5 weeks (Group 2), and 37 received 5100 cGy in 30 daily fractions for 6 weeks (Group 3). Seventeen patients had intravaginal brachytherapy after whole-pelvis RT. Local recurrence developed in two patients (2.3%) (one in Group 1 and one in Group 2). Statistical analysis showed that the depth of myometrial invasion significantly influenced survival (P = 0.016). Tumor grade, pathologic stage, whole-pelvis radiation dose, and the use of brachytherapy did not influence survival. Complications occurred in 9.5% of patients in Group 1, 24.7% in Group 2, and 40.5% in Group 3. Three patients who received brachytherapy had rectal injuries. The authors conclude that 4250 cGy in 25 fractions for 5 weeks of whole-pelvis RT appears to induce fewer complications than higher doses, and may be sufficient to prevent local recurrence in most patients who require adjuvant RT. A clinical trial is needed to determine the optimum dose-time-fractionation regimen.     

Definitive irradiation in carcinoma of the vagina: long-term evaluation of results

A retrospective analysis of 165 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the vagina is reported. Actuarial disease-free 10-year survival was: Stage 0 (16 patients)--94%, Stage I (50 patients)--75%, Stage IIA (49 patients)--55%, Stage IIB (26 patients)--43%, Stage III (16 patients)--32%, Stage IV (8 patients)--0%. All but one of the in situ lesions were controlled with intracavitary therapy. Of the patients with Stage I disease, 86% showed no evidence of vaginal or pelvic recurrence. Most of them received interstitial or intracavitary therapy or both; the addition of external beam irradiation did not significantly increase survival or tumor control. In Stage IIA (paravaginal extension) 61% of the tumors were controlled with a combination of brachytherapy and external beam irradiation. Ten of 16 Stage III tumors were controlled in the pelvis. Two of the patients with Stage IV disease had no recurrence in the pelvis with relatively high doses of irradiation. The total incidence of distant metastases was 16% in Stage I, 30.6% in Stage IIA, 46.1% in Stage IIB, 62% in Stage III, and 50% in Stage IV. The dose of irradiation delivered to the primary tumor or the parametrial extension was critical in achieving successful results. The incidence of grade 2-3 complications (12%) is correlated with the stage of the tumor and type of treatment given. More effective irradiation techniques including the optimization of dose distribution by judicious combination of external irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy will be necessary to enhance loco-regional tumor control. The high incidence of distant metastases underscores the need for earlier diagnosis and effective systemic cytotoxic agents if survival is to be significantly improved in these patients.     

Prognostic assessment of tumor regression after external irradiation for cervical cancer.

From February 1980 to December 1986, 428 cases of cervical cancer in Stage I through IVA were given curative radiation therapy at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei. All of them received external irradiation and intracavitary brachytherapy. The degree of tumor regression was assessed immediately before the first intracavitary brachytherapy treatment. Patients were classified at this time as having (a) no gross residual tumor, or (b) gross residual tumor. Factors found to be associated with tumor regression by logistic regression analysis were stage, age and hemoglobin level. Patients with advanced cancer (Stage III, IVA), young age (less than 40 years), and low hemoglobin level (less than 10 g/dl) had a low incidence of no gross residual tumor. Five-year survival rate was 77% in patients with no gross residual tumor and 31% in patients with gross residual tumor (p less than 0.001). This significant difference held true even when one compared these two groups stage for stage; the difference was 77% versus 41% (p less than 0.001) in Stage II and 72% versus 28% (p less than 0.001) in Stage III. The local relapse rate was 59% in the gross residual tumor groups, significantly greater (p less than 0.001) than the 12% found in the no gross residual tumor group. It was concluded that patients whose tumors did not regress after external pelvic irradiation tended to recur after intracavitary brachytherapy, most often locally. This would justify a more aggressive treatment to improve local tumor control in this subset of high risk patients.     

Influence of preoperative irradiation on failures of endometrial carcinoma with high risk of lymph node metastasis

From 1965-1980, 80 patients with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium, FIGO-AJC Stage I, Grade 3 and Stage II received preoperative radiation therapy. Thirty-three patients had Stage I, Grade 3 and 47 had Stage II. All patients were treated with preoperative radiation therapy (intracavitary application, external pelvic irradiation or both) followed by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. They were followed from 3-18 years (median, 6.2 years) after the completion of treatment and none was lost to follow-up. Overall 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was 75%. Preoperative external whole pelvic plus intracavitary irradiation gave the best 5-year survival of 83%; there were no failures after 20 months. In comparison to this group, survival for the intracavitary alone group was 64% at 5 years and 54% at 8 years. The 5-year survival of Stage II was 81% compared to 66% of the Stage I, Grade 3 group. Prognostic variables were analyzed and showed that the residual tumor in the specimen at the time of surgery after the preoperative irradiation was significantly correlated to a worse prognosis: patients who were found to have no residual tumor had a 5-year survival rate of 96% compared to 65% of those who were found to have residual tumor (p less than 0.01). Age, stage, methods of preoperative irradiation, dose of external pelvic irradiation or intracavitary application were not statistically significant prognostic factors. The grade of the tumor was suggestive as a prognostic variable. The most common failure site was the para-aortic lymph nodes independent of treatment methods and stage. Four patients developed complications possibly related to the radiation therapy. Our study suggests that preoperative external and intracavitary irradiation reduces the frequency of residual microscopic carcinoma and improves survival for patients with Stage I, Grade 3 and Stage II carcinoma of the endometrium.     

High dose rate afterloading intracavitary therapy in carcinoma of the cervix

From January 1984 through December 1986, 87 patients with previously untreated carcinoma of the cervix received external beam pelvic irradiation and high dose rate intracavitary therapy (HDRT). There were 18 Stage IIA patients, 39 Stage IIB, and 30 Stage IIIB. The median age was 60 years and the median follow-up time was 42 months for patients at risk. Radiotherapy consisted of external megavoltage irradiation to the whole pelvis (median dose 4600 cGy) combined with one (6 patients), two (51 patients), or three (30 patients) HDRT insertions. A high dose rate remote afterloading unit with 60Co sources was used to deliver the HDRT. The prescribed dose to point A was between 800 and 1000 cGy per treatment. The dose rate at point A initially was approximately 150 cGy/min and dropped to approximately 100 cGy/min during the duration of the study. Treatments with multiple fractions were given at weekly intervals. The overall actuarial survival at 5 years was 88% for Stage IIA, 64% for Stage IIB and 32% for Stage IIIB patients. Pelvic recurrence remained the major cause of failure. Grade III and IV late complications included proctitis and bowel obstruction in six patients each. We conclude that HDRT results are similar to those obtained with conventional low dose rate intracavitary systems. HDRT is cost effective and minimizes exposure to personnel. Several questions, such as the total number of insertions required, dose per HDRT insertion, and optimal HDRT insertion schedule remain unanswered and further experience is needed to better clarify these issues.     

Intracavitary irradiation for carcinoma of the urinary bladder: rationale, technique, and preliminary results

Twelve patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder have been treated employing a combination of external beam radiation (4000 to 5040 cGy/4 to 5.5 weeks) supplemented by intracavitary irradiation (1500 to 3000 cGy mucosal dose) using a triple lumen balloon catheter containing a central 137Cs source. The rationale, patient selection, and preliminary results are reported, and the technique of the intracavitary brachytherapy is described.     

High dose-rate afterloading in the treatment of cervical cancer of the uterus

From January 1981 to December 1983, 380 patients with cervical carcinoma of uterus were treated with high dose-rate intracavitary afterloading therapy (Ralstron-20B) and 60Co external irradiation. All of these cases have been followed over 3-5 years. The 5-year survival rates for Stages I, II, III, and IV were 100%, 81.5%, 73.9%, and 0% respectively. The over all 5-year survival rate was 79.1%. The results were comparable to that of conventional radium therapy in 1980 (5-year survival rate for radium group: Stage I 50%, Stage II 72.2%, Stage III 52.2%, Stage IV 0%). The moderate and severe rectal reactions in this series were 11.8% and 1.6% (radium group moderate 6.0%, severe 2.2%), which were higher than that of radium group. The incidence of bladder reaction was 7.1%. The problems of high dose-rate intracavitary therapy and the combination therapy with intracavitary and external irradiation are discussed in this paper.     

Radiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma: role of high-dose-rate intracavitary irradiation

A total of 119 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who were seen during a 10-year period were analyzed retrospectively in terms of survival rate and local control rate in relation to treatment method and disease stage. All patients were treated with radiotherapy alone: 43 patients were treated with external irradiation plus high-dose-rate intracavitary irradiation (Group 1), 46 with external irradiation only, to 50 Gy or more (Group 2), and 30 with external irradiation to less than 50 Gy (Group 3). All patients of Group 3 died within 8 months (mean 3.5 months) after the initiation of radiotherapy. In Group 1, the 2-year survival rate was 27.9% for the patients in all disease stages and 44.0% for those in Stage 1 and Stage 2 in contrast to Group 2, with a 2-year survival rate of 4.3% for the patients in all stages and 9.1% for those in Stage 1 and 2. The local control rate was 62.8% in Group 1, significantly higher than 19.6% in Group 2. It is concluded that high-dose-rate intracavitary irradiation following external irradiation is an effective treatment modality for esophageal carcinoma, especially in a limited stage.     

CT与食管癌腔内照射的预后

 目的：探讨食管癌外侵程度与腔内照射关系,以及对病人预后的影响。方法：1993年10月~1994年3月,23例中晚期食管癌病人接受外照射加腔内治疗,先常规外照射3800cGy/19次,然后行Ir192腔内照射。结果：13例生存1年以上,10例生存不满1年,这两组病人的病变长度、CT最大外侵程度、管腔直径、生存期的平均值分别为6.2cm,11.5mm、6.3mm、15.7个月和8.0cm、19.8mm、8.3mm、7.6个月。结论：食管癌病变长度小于5.0cm,CT最大外侵不超过15mm,管腔直径介于5~6mm之间,可能是腔内照射最好适应症。