亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效观察

目的探讨亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤病人的方法、注意事项及治疗效果。方法将重型颅脑损伤病人（GCS≤8分）80例随机分成亚低温治疗组和对照组各40例,对照组按常规治疗,实验组常规治疗基础上于伤后24 h内接受亚低温治疗,直肠温度控制在32~35℃,维持亚低温7~14 d;2组病人均通过生命征监护,颅内压、电解质及血气分析监测。结果与对照组相比,亚低温治疗组病人伤后高颅压、高体温很快得到控制,而生命体征、血气及电解质2组变化不大。结论亚低温疗法能减轻颅脑损伤后脑水肿、降低颅内压和改善预后,疗效确切,安全有效,可降低病死率,提高生存质量。     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效观察

我院自1998年至今采用亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤病人62例,目的在于掌握治疗方法及进一步研究亚低温的临床疗效。     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床疗效观察

目的探讨亚低温疗法在颅脑损伤治疗中的作用。方法73例颅脑损伤患者分为①亚低温组：31例，均于伤后24h内接受亚低温治疗，直肠温度控制在32～34℃，维持3～7d；②常规治疗组：42例，其他治疗同亚低温组，根据GOS预后评估系统评估两组患者疗效。结果与常规治疗组相比，亚低温组患者伤后早期颅内压显著下降（P〈0．05）；生命体征、血气及电解质无显著性差异（P〈0．05）；无严重并发症，死亡率降低，恢复良好，预后显著改善。结论亚低温疗法能减轻颅脑损伤后脑水肿，降低颅内压，伤后24h内接受亚低温治疗，疗效确切，可降低颅脑损伤患者的死亡率，提高其生存质量。     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床疗效观察

目的 观察亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的治疗效果.方法 2010-02-01-2012-08-01我院共收治重型颅脑损伤患者124例,运用数字表法将上述研究对象进行分组,对照组62例患者运用常规方式治疗;观察组62例运用亚低温治疗,即患者受伤后24 h内进行亚低温治疗,其直肠温度32～35℃,脑温度33～35℃,持续时间为1～7 d,对比上述2组患者的临床疗效.结果 观察组患者的临床治疗总有效率为96.77%,明显优于对照组87.10%,差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 重型颅脑损伤患者运用亚低温方式进行治疗有助于降低患者的病死率,并减少治疗并发症,对提高患者的预后和生存质量均具有积极意义,值得推广.     

早期应用亚低温联合纳洛酮治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效观察

目的探讨早期应用亚低温联合纳洛酮治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床效果。方法选取2006-12—2011-12在我院接受治疗的重型颅脑损伤患者(GCS计分≤8分)120例,随机分为治疗组和对照组各60例。对照组常规治疗,治疗组在常规治疗的基础上加用亚低温与纳洛酮进行联合治疗。结果治疗组的治疗效果明显优于对照组,治疗组的病死率20.0%,与对照组的31.7%相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后的第7、21天,治疗组GCS评分均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后3个月GOS评定,治疗组生存质量明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论早期给予患者亚低温与纳洛酮联合治疗重型颅脑损伤,能降低病死率,有效改善患者的GCS评分,加快恢复进程,提高患者的生存质量。     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的护理

目的 探讨亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的护理措施.方法 对30例重型颅脑损伤病人于病后2～24h进行亚低温治疗,通过冰毯冰帽综合治疗仪、冬眠药物及降低环境温度三种方法联合应用,使病人体温每小时降0.5℃～1.5℃,维持肛温32℃～34℃,使用3～7d,并配合有效护理措施.结果 应用亚低温治疗病人均得到满意治疗效果,其中恢复良好17例,轻残8例,重残2例,植物状态0例,死亡3例.与常规组疗效相比差异显著(U=1.99,P<0.05).结论 对重型颅脑损伤病人采用亚低温治疗能显著降低脑组织耗氧量,减轻脑水肿,降低颅内压,促进神经功能恢复,提高生存率,降低死亡率.     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤的效果观察

目的观察亚低温对重型颅脑损伤（sTBI）患者的治疗效果。方法36例sTBI患者（Gcs≤8分）随机分为对照组和亚低温组,每组18例。伤后0、1、3、7、14、21d各行一次头颅CT检查,手术后病人均持续监测颅内压7d。对照组维持正常体温,亚低温组人院后在4．8h内将肛温降至33℃左右,并维持3～5d。比较两组颅内压、伤灶脑水肿体积变化和预后不良（GOS〈3分）率。结果在伤后第7天,对照组和亚低温组颅内压分别为（3．15±0．24）kPa和（1．78±0．24）kPa;在伤后第14天,对照组和亚低温组伤灶脑水肿体积分别为（140．90±22．95）cm^3和（81．72±15．95）cm^3;伤后1周内患者清醒率对照组和亚低温组分别为22．2％（4／18）和55．6％（10／18）;伤后3年随防时,预后不良率对照组为55．6％（10／18）,亚低温组为22．2％（4／18）。上述指标两组比较均相差显著（P〈0．05）。结论亚低温治疗法能减轻颅脑损伤患者的脑水肿,稳定其颅内压、缩短其昏迷时间,从而改善其远期预后。     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

目的 通过比较重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗组与常温治疗组的预后来证实亚低温治疗的脑保护作用. 方法 选取重型颅脑损伤患者76例(GCS≤8分),分为亚低温治疗组(36例)和常温治疗组(40例).常温治疗组患者应用脱水降颅压、营养神经、止血、抑制胃酸分泌、营养支持等常规治疗.亚低温治疗组患者除常规治疗外,合并应用冰毯实行亚低温治疗(患者躺在冰毯垫上,通过体表散热使中心体温和脑温降至所需温度,通常为32～34℃,并根据病情需要维持3～14 d).结果亚低温治疗组患者预后优于常温组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论 亚低温治疗对重型颅脑损伤患者具有脑保护作用,能提高临床疗效,值得推广应用.     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的体会

目的观察亚低温在重型颅脑损伤患者治疗中的作用。方法重型颅脑损伤患者40例,采用亚低温技术治疗。结果40例病人死亡4例,生存率90%,其中24例病人预后良好,生活可基本自理。结论通过对重型颅脑损伤病人预亚低温治疗,对提高患者生存率及预后有积极意义。     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤患者亚低温治疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the prognoses of patients with severe brain injury receiving mild hypothermia and normothermia interventions and evaluate the brain protective effect of mild hypothermia. Methods Seventy-six patients with severe head injury (Glaseow Coma Score≤8) were divided into mild hypothermia group (36 cases) and normothermia group (40 cases). The patients in the normothermia group were managed with measures for reducing the intracranial pressure and controlling the hemorrhage and gastric acid, with also administration of neurotrophic treatment and nutritional support. In addition to these conventional interventions, the patients in mild hypothermia group received mild hypothermia treatment administered using a water blanket to reduce the core body temperature and brain temperature to 32-34℃, which was maintained for 3-14 days as needed. Results The patients receiving mild hypothermia therapy had significantly improved prognosis in comparison with those in normothermia group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mild hypothermia treatment has brain protective effect and improves the prognosis of patients with severe brain injury.     

重型颅脑损伤的亚低温治疗

目的分析92例重型颅脑损伤(GCS≤8分)病人的亚低温治疗体会。方法对我科1998年3月至2002年12月亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤病人进行回顾性分析。结果92例重型颅脑损伤病人存活66例,死亡26例;其中恢复良好60例,中、重残疾6例。无植物生存。结论临床应用亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤病人,能显著改善重型颅脑损伤病人的预后。     

亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤33个观察

本文报道我院自１９９８年５月至１９９９年４月使用医用冰毯配合冬眠药物治疗重型离损伤３３例,疗效良好１５例（４５．４％）,死亡１１例（３３．３％）,较接近有关作者 ３０例的结果,提示在常规治疗前提下辅以亚低温冬眠疗法,有利于死亡率降低,生存质量提高。