三七总皂苷对顺铂肾损害大鼠肾组织差异表达蛋白质的影响

目的 探讨三七总皂苷（panax notoginsenosides,PNS）对顺铂肾损害大鼠肾组织差异表达蛋白质的影响。方法 实验大鼠随机分为正常对照组、顺铂模型组和PNS治疗组,对大鼠给药处理10 d后,检测大鼠血清尿素氮（BUN）、肌酐（Scr）和尿N-乙酰-β-氨基葡萄糖苷酶（NAG）的水平,并做肾脏病理检查;采用SELDI-TOF-MS技术筛选大鼠肾组织的差异表达蛋白质,并通过MALDI-TOF-MS/MS、Western blot实验予以鉴定。结果 顺铂模型组大鼠血清BUN、Scr和尿NAG的水平均显著高于正常对照组（P均〈0.05）。电镜下可见肾小管上皮细胞的线粒体明显损伤,说明顺铂肾损害大鼠模型制作成功。PNS干预可使大鼠血清BUN、Scr和尿NAG的水平显著低于顺铂模型组（P〈0.05）,肾小管上皮细胞的线粒体损害程度较顺铂模型组明显改善,提示PNS对其有保护作用。筛选出顺铂模型组与正常对照组肾组织差异表达的蛋白质20个,其中7个蛋白质在顺铂模型组中的表达下调2倍以上;顺铂模型组与PNS治疗组肾组织差异表达的蛋白质18个,其中11个蛋白质在PNS治疗组中的表达下调;有6个共同的差异表达蛋白质在顺铂模型组较正常对照组的表达上调或下调,在PNS治疗组可回调到接近正常对照组水平。差异表达蛋白质m/z 10815.42被鉴定为线粒体热休克蛋白,m/z 16021.67被鉴定为血红蛋白β1亚基、血红蛋白β2亚基。结论 顺铂肾损害可伴随多种蛋白质的表达变化,这些差异表达蛋白质可能与顺铂损害肾脏以及PNS的保护作用有关。通过对其分离和鉴定,进一步了解其性质,将有助于全面、系统地探讨顺铂肾损害以及PNS保护作用的机制。     

氨磷汀对顺铂肾毒性损伤的保护作用及其机制的研究

目的 观察顺铂的肾毒性损伤部位、形式与肾功能检查结果的相关性,以了解细胞凋亡的发生机制和氨磷汀的保护机制是否与肾组织Fas和FasL表达改变有关。方法 随机将大鼠分成3组,即对照组（生理盐水）、顺铂组（6mg／kg）和氨磷汀组（顺铂6mg／kg＋氨磷汀200mg／kg）,取其血清标本和肾组织,分别做血清BUN、Cr检测和肾组织病理学检查,并用原位缺口末端标记法（TUNEL）做肾组织凋亡细胞检测、Fas和FasL免疫组化染色,再用图像分析软件对其做阳性细胞计数和染色总灰度值测定。结果 顺铂组动物血清BUN、Cr值均明显高于对照组和氨磷汀保护组,3d时,差异已有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;5d时,两者差异分别为P〈0．01和P〈0．05;10d时,恢复正常。顺铂组肾小管上皮细胞坏死和凋亡均很严重,其凋亡细胞计数明显高于对照组和氨磷汀组（P值均〈0．01）,肾组织Fas和FasL表达的总灰度值,明显高于对照组和氨磷汀组（P值均〈0．01）。结论 氨磷汀对顺铂的肾毒性损伤有保护作用,其机制可能与抑制肾组织Fas和FasL的表达有关。     

Hydroxyl radical scavenger ameliorates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity by preventing oxidative stress, redox state unbalance, impairment of energetic metabolism and apoptosis in rat kidney mitochondria

Nephrotoxicity is the major dose-limiting factor of cisplatin chemotherapy. Reactive oxygen species generated in mitochondria are thought to be the main cause of cellular damage in such injury. The present study examined, in vivo, the protective potential of the hydroxyl radical scavenger dimethylthiourea (DMTU) against cisplatin-induced effects on renal mitochondrial bioenergetics, redox state and oxidative stress. Adult male Wistar rats (200 to 220 g) were divided into four groups of eight animals each. The control group was treated only with an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of saline solution (1 ml/100 g body weight). The second group was given only DMTU (500 mg/kg body weight, i.p, followed by 125 mg/Kg, i.p., twice a day until they were killed). The third group was given a single injection of cisplatin (10 mg/kg body weight, i.p.). The fourth group was given DMTU (500 mg/kg body weight, i.p.), just before the cisplatin injection (10 mg/kg body weight, i.p.), followed by injections of DMTU (125 mg/kg body weight, i.p.) twice a day until they were killed. Animals were killed 72 h after the treatment. Besides not presenting any direct effect on mitochondria, DMTU substantially inhibited cisplatin-induced mitochondrial injury and cellular death by apoptosis, suppressing the occurrence of acute renal failure. All the following cisplatin-induced effects were prevented by DMTU: (1) increased plasmatic levels of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN); (2) decreased ATP content, calcium uptake and electrochemical potential; (3) oxidation of lipids, including cardiolipin; and oxidation of proteins, including sulfhydryl, and aconitase enzyme, as well as accumulation of carbonyl proteins; (4) depletion of the antioxidant defense (NADPH and GSH) and (5) increased activity of the apoptosis executioner caspase-3. Our findings show the important role played by mitochondria and hydroxyl radicals in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, as well as the effectiveness of DMTU in preventing the renal mitochondrial damage caused by cisplatin. These results strongly suggest that protection of mitochondria by hydroxyl radical scavengers may be an interesting approach to prevent the kidney tissue damage caused by cisplatin-chemotherapy.     

Low urine osmolarity as a determinant of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

Cisplatin is widely used in the treatment of human tumors, but it is a nephrotoxic drug. Early pragmatic clinical trials have shown that cisplatin-induced renal toxicity is greatly reduced through the use of high hydration, a large NaCl supply and mannitol infusion, but the precise mechanisms of these nephroprotective measures are not fully understood. We show here an increase in the cisplatin uptake and cytotoxicity on 56/10 A1 human glomerular and HK-2 human tubular cells when the drug incubation was performed in a hypotonic phosphate-buffered saline solution or in human urine ("drag in" transport hypothesis). When 4 mg/kg cisplatin was intraperitoneally injected in rats in 20 ml of a hypotonic 4 g/l NaCl solution, the platinum accumulation increased in both the cortex and papilla but not in the subcutaneously grafted colon tumors when compared to rats injected with cisplatin in normal or hyperosmotic solutions (9 and 14 g/l NaCl, respectively). The urea and creatinine blood levels were significantly increased, and more apoptotic cells were detected by the caspase-3 cleavage and TUNEL assays in the tubular cells of rats treated with cisplatin in a hypotonic solution compared to animals that received normal or hypertonic solutions. Osmolarity was sometimes low in urine from patients receiving an intravenous hydration for a cisplatin treatment or from healthy volunteers who were given an oral hydration with a 50 g/l glucose solution. Our results show that low urine osmolarity could be a major determinant in the increase of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and justify the widely used concurrent infusion of osmotically active substances during intravenous hydration.     

Direct amifostine effect on renal tubule cells in rats.

Clinical trials indicate that amifostine offers protection against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear whether a direct pharmacological t on renal tubular cells is involved. We investigated the effect of amifostine pretreatment on the tubular apparatus and evaluated its nephroprotective potential. A total of 32 rats were treated by i.p. administration of 0.9% saline solution (group 1), 5 mg/kg cisplatin (group 2), 25 mg/kg amifostine (group 3), and 25 mg/kg amifostine followed by 5 mg/kg cisplatin (group 4) after 30 min. We recorded elevation of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) in 24 h pooled urine as a specific marker for tubular lesions, renal leakage of magnesium as an unspecific nephrotoxicity marker, and survival over a 10-day observation period. A significant (P < 0.002) increase in urinary NAG after treatment was documented only in cisplatin-treated group 2 [day 2 (mean+/-SE), 93+/-2.1 units/gram creatinine; day 4, 70.6+/-16 units/gram creatinine; normalization at day 8]. Treatment with amifostine before cisplatin administration resulted in a slight urinary NAG leakage (day 2, 2.8+/-1.8 units/gram creatinine; day 4, 13.8+/-13 units/gram creatinine; normalization at day 6). No increase in urinary enzyme levels was seen in the other groups, and there were no significant differences in urinary magnesium between all groups. Four of eight rats in the cisplatin-treated group and one of eight rats in the amifostine plus cisplatin-treated group died.     

Sunitinib improves chemotherapeutic efficacy and ameliorates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in experimental animals

Purpose

Therapeutic inhibition of angiogenesis has a benefit in the treatment of neoplastic diseases. Cisplatin is a widely used anti-cancer agent; however, it has serious side effects on non-tumor cells and causes nephrotoxicity due to its reactive oxygen species?Cmediated effect. Thus, a combination between cisplatin and angiogenesis inhibitors may be useful in cancer treatment. In the present study, the effect of sunitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, on the antitumor activity as well as the nephrotoxic side effect of cisplatin was examined.

Methods

The antitumor activity was evaluated both in vitro using cultured Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells and in vivo using a mouse model of solid tumor. In addition, the effect of cisplatin and/or sunitinib on the angiogenic marker, VEGF, was examined. Nephrotoxicity was induced in rats by single i.p. injection of cisplatin (6?mg/kg).

Results

Sunitinib significantly potentiated the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin in vitro and in vivo. The nephrotoxicity of cisplatin was evidenced by decrease in the body weight, increase in kidney/body weight ratio and decrease in the percent survival of rats. The toxicity was also confirmed biochemically by measuring some kidney function parameters and oxidative stress markers. Sunitinib significantly decreased cisplatin-induced changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine clearance and micro total protein in urine, renal malondialdehyde levels and reduced glutathione contents. In addition, sunitinib effectively blunted cisplatin-induced proximal and distal tubules necrosis.

Conclusion

The potential for sunitinib to ameliorate the cisplatin-evoked toxicity as well as to improve the chemotherapeutic effect could have beneficial implications for patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.     

Effects of the diuretics mannitol or acetazolamide on nephrotoxicity and physiological disposition of cisplatin in rats

Summary The anticancer drug cisplatin has been known to produce severe renal lesions characterized by high levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), toxic nephrosis, and platinum (Pt) retention in the kidney. The effect of IV pretreatment with acetazolamide (ACZ) 30 min before or mannitol (MAN) immediately prior to IP administration of 5 mg/kg cisplatin on Pt excretion, tissue distribution, and nephrotoxicity was investigated in male F344 rats.ACZ pretreatment reduced the cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, as indicated by only a slight elevation of BUN, a milder histopathologic lesion, and a more rapid recovery of renal function and structure. Although MAN-pretreated animals exhibited similar changes in BUN to ACZ-pretreated animals, the renal damage was similar to that seen in aninals treated with cisplatin alone. A reduction of kidney Pt content was observed with both diuretics, although there was significantly less retention after ACZ pretreatment.The diuretic ACZ was more effective than MAN in reducing the renal lesions induced by cisplatin and it might be clinically useful in preventing cisplatin nephrotoxicity.     

WR2721 as a modulator of cisplatin-and carboplatin-induced side effects in comparison with other chemoprotective agents: a molecular approach

Cisplatin is an active cytostatic that became successful in the treatment of several types of solid tumours after its nephrotoxic potential was controlled by hydration and diuresis. Thiol compounds were tested to reduce further cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Thiosulphate is rapidly excreted by the kidneys and protects against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity by inactivating reactive platinum species in the kidney. Due to inactivation of cisplatin in the circulation, thiosulphate also interferes with its antitumour activity. Therefore, it is mainly used in two-route schedules, whereby cisplatin is delivered locally to the tumour (i.p. or i.a.) while systemic (i.v.) thiosulphate protects the kidneys. Diethyldithiocarbamate was shown to protect against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in several animal models by reversing cellular damage. However, in the clinic it has been less successful, partly due to its central nervous system toxicity. The endogenous thiol compounds glutathione and metallothionein have been shown to reduce cisplatin-induced toxicity both in animal models and in clinical trials. However, the results are rather preliminary and a reduction in therapeutic efficacy may be expected, for both glutathione and metallothionein have been reported to be involved in platinum resistance. The thioether methionine has been shown to reduce cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in animal models but it has not yet been tested in the clinic. Cisplatin-induced acute emesis can be sufficiently controlled with a new class of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5HT₃)-receptor blockers, but delayed emesis remains a problem. High-dose cisplatin regimens with protection of the kidneys induces ototoxicity, peripheral neuropathy and myelotoxicity, which become doselimiting. Neurotoxicity was partly reversed by the neurogenerative agent ORG2766, but this agent does not reduce other cisplatin-induced toxicities. Therefore, an agent capable of protecting multiple non-tumour tissues is needed. Carboplatin is a second-generation analogue of cisplatin with less nephro-, neuro-and ototoxicity. Carboplatin is at least as active as cisplatin at its maximum tolerated dose, which is defined by its myelotoxicity. Protection from carboplatin-induced myelotoxicity may be controlled by autologous bone marrow transplantation and/or hematopoietic growth factor infusions. High-dose carboplatin schedules may cause nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity. Again, the protection of multiple non-tumour tissues is needed. WR2721 appears to be such a modulating agent capable of protecting multiple non-tumour tissues. It was shown to be preferentially metabolized and taken up as the thiol metabolite WR1065 by non-tumour tissues as compared with *hypoxic) solid tumours. It was shown to protect mice from cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and from cisplatin-and carboplatin-induced myelotoxicity without interfering with the antitumour activity. The first clinical studies suggest the same selective protection of multiple non-tumour tissues from cisplatin-induced toxicity. This could be explained by a strong prevention (not reversal) of cisplatin-induced cellular damage by WR1065, whereas WR2721 or its main metabolites will hardly inactivate the intact platinum-based drug in the circulation.     

Experimental study of the protective effect of glutathione against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

Glutathione (GSH) is the most important intracellular thiol-compound which participates in the detoxification mechanisms of the cell. Its high affinity to react with platinum complexes would give rise to lower or non-toxic metabolites and prevent cisplatin nephrotoxicity. In order to determine if GSH can protect against cisplatin-induced renal toxicity, 120 female Wistar rats received LD-100 or LD-50 of cisplatin with or without GSH, at two different dose levels and by two different routes. Biochemical and histological changes as survival was observed in each group. The administration of GSH did not modify cisplatin LD-100. When cisplatin LD-50 was used, a significant improvement in the survival rate was observed in the group which received GSH as chemoprotector (100% vs 40%). The average values of urea and creatinine were significantly lower in the group treated with GSH (115 vs 370 mg/dl and 1.07 vs 4.02 mg/dl respectively). The degree of the tissue injury was also lower in the GSH group. The administration of GSH prior to cisplatin reduces its nephrotoxicity in this animal model. Further clinical trials are necessary to verify this protective effect when cisplatin is used as a cyclic administration and at different dose levels.     

Saline,mannitol, and furosemide hydration in acute cisplatin nephrotoxicity: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine which hydration (saline, saline + mannitol, or saline + furosemide) is associated with least cisplatin nephrotoxicity. METHODS: We randomized 49 women who received cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) into one of the three hydration arms. The 24-h creatinine clearance was measured before and on day 6 after cisplatin infusion. The patients of each arm received 2 l of saline hydration. In the saline + furosemide arm, 40 mg of furosemide was given after hydration. In the saline + mannitol arm, 50 g of mannitol was mixed with the cisplatin. RESULTS: For the first cycle of chemotherapy, 15 women were randomized to saline, 17 to saline + furosemide, and 17 to saline + mannitol. For each group, the creatinine clearances before cisplatin infusion were (means+/-SD, milliliters per minute) 84.5+/-26.8, 82.5+/-24.0 and 87.4+/-25.6, and after cisplatin infusion were 79.1+/-31.9, 68.7+/-21.5, and 56.4+/-22.9, respectively. The decreases in creatinine clearance were similar between the saline group and the saline + furosemide group ( P=0.66), but different between the saline + mannitol group and the saline group ( P=0.02) or the saline + furosemide group ( P=0.02). As each woman received multiple courses of cisplatin, 15 who received saline contributed 41 paired datasets, 17 who received saline + furosemide contributed 49 paired datasets, and 17 who received saline + mannitol contributed 36 paired datasets showed similar patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Hydration with saline or saline + furosemide appears to be associated with less cisplatin nephrotoxicity than saline + mannitol.     

Moderate renal dysfunction may not require a cisplatin dose reduction: a retrospective study of cancer patients with renal impairment

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the tolerability of cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with moderate renal dysfunction.

Methods

To investigate the relationship between CDDP dose and nephrotoxicity, a retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with a creatinine clearance (Ccr) of 30–60 mL/min. Subjects were classified into three groups according to the CDDP dose, as determined by the physician, and the nephrotoxicity among these groups was compared. Additionally, we investigated the correlation coefficients between maximum serum creatinine (Scr) level or minimum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and baseline Ccr.

Results

Fifty-six patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 13 patients received 30–40 mg/m² CDDP (group I), 18 patients received 40–70 mg/m² (group II), and 25 patients received 70–80 mg/m² (group III). No significant difference in nephrotoxicity was observed (median Scr 1.53, 1.61, and 1.53 mg/dL, respectively), and no correlation was observed between baseline Ccr and maximum Scr (r = 0.004, p = 0.979) or minimum eGFR (r = 0.21, p = 0.119). Only two patients (3.5 %) experienced grade 3 or 4 Scr elevation—one patient with a Ccr of 52.6 mL/min received 60 mg/m² CDDP, and the other patient with a Ccr of 52.1 mL/min received 70 mg/m² of CDDP. Hemodialysis was not observed.

Conclusion

CDDP was tolerated at doses of 35–80 mg/m² among patients with moderate renal impairment. Empiric dose reduction might create a risk of under-treatment.     

Mechanistic study of BNP7787-mediated cisplatin nephroprotection: modulation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

Purpose

The mechanisms for cisplatin-induced renal cell injury have been the focus of intense investigation for many years with a view to provide a more effective and convenient form of nephroprotection. BNP7787 (disodium 2,2′-dithio-bis ethane sulfonate; dimesna, Tavocept?), is a water-soluble disulfide investigational new drug that is undergoing clinical development for the prevention and mitigation of clinically important chemotherapy-induced toxicities associated with platinum-type chemotherapeutic agents. We hypothesized that part of BNP7787’s mechanism of action (MOA) pertaining to the potential prevention of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity involves the inhibition of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) activity, mediated by BNP7787-derived mesna–disulfide heteroconjugates that contain a terminal gamma-glutamate moiety [e.g., mesna–glutathione (MSSGlutathione) and mesna–cysteinyl-glutamate (MSSCE)].

Methods

Inhibition studies were conducted on human and porcine GGT to determine the effect of mesna–disulfide heteroconjugates on the enzyme’s activity in vitro. These studies utilized a fluorimetric assay that monitored the hydrolysis of l-gamma-glutamyl-7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin (GG-AFC) to AFC.

Results

Mesna–disulfide heteroconjugates that contained gamma-glutamyl moieties were potent inhibitors of human and porcine GGT. An in situ-generated mesna–cisplatin conjugate was not a substrate for GGT.

Conclusions

The GGT xenobiotic metabolism pathway is postulated to be a major toxification pathway for cisplatin nephrotoxicity, and BNP7787 may play a novel and critical therapeutic role in the modulation of GGT activity. We further postulate that there are two general mechanisms for BNP7787-mediated nephroprotection against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity involving this pathway. First, the active BNP7787 pharmacophore, mesna, produces an inactive mesna–cisplatin conjugate that is not a substrate for the GGT toxification pathway (GGT xenobiotic metabolism pathway) and, second, BNP7787-derived mesna–disulfide heteroconjugates may serve as selective, potent inhibitors of GGT, possibly resulting in nephroprotection by a novel means.     

Mechanistic study of BNP7787-mediated cisplatin nephroprotection: modulation of human aminopeptidase N

Purpose

Previous studies from our laboratory have identified a role for gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) in BNP7787 (disodium 2,2??-dithio-bis ethane sulfonate, dimesna, Tavocept?)-mediated cisplatin nephroprotection. Dekant has proposed that gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), aminopeptidase N (APN) and cysteine-conjugate-??-lyase (CCBL) comprise a multi-enzyme pathway that acts on xenobiotic-glutathione conjugates converting them to nephrotoxic metabolites. We report modulation of APN activity within this pathway by BNP7787-derived mesna-disulfide heteroconjugates.

Methods

A fluorimetric assay was used to determine the effect of BNP7787, BNP7787-derived mesna-disulfide heteroconjugates, and the BNP7787 metabolite, mesna (sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate), on the initial velocity and overall progress curve of the human APN reaction in vitro.

Results

Neither BNP7787 nor mesna-cysteinyl-glutamate inhibited human APN. Select BNP7787-derived mesna-disulfide heteroconjugates (mesna-cysteine, mesna-glutathione, mesna-cysteinyl-glycine) and high concentrations of mesna inhibited APN activity. Allosteric effects on the enzyme progress curve outside of the linear initial velocity region were observed for mesna-cysteinyl-glycine, mesna-glutathione and mesna-cysteinyl-glutamate and appeared to be a function of having both mesna and di- or tri-peptide functionalities in one molecule. In?situ-generated mesna-cisplatin conjugates were not a substrate for human APN.

Conclusions

BNP7787-mediated prevention or mitigation of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity may involve APN inhibition by certain BNP7787-derived mesna-disulfide heteroconjugates and appears correlated to the presence of a glycinate moiety and/or an anionic group. Two general mechanisms for BNP7787-mediated nephroprotection of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity involving the GGT, APN and CCBL nephrotoxigenic pathway are proposed which acting in a concerted and/or synergistic manner, and thereby prevent or mitigate cisplatin-induced renal toxicity.     

Studies on adequate intervals of cisplatin administration to ameliorate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

Experimental studies were designed in order to ameliorate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Cisplatin was injected intravenously into DS mice at a dose of 5.0 mg/kg. Plasma platinum levels declined in a biphasic fashion and were undetectable after 5 days post-infusion. Renal platinum levels decreased in the same manner as the plasma levels and revealed detectable plateau levels 5 days after single injection. Cisplatin was administer once a week for 3 consecutive weeks; serial plasma and renal platinum levels and BUN were measured 7 days after each injection. The results showed that there was no significant change in the levels of plasma platinum and BUN but that the renal platinum levels increased progressively (1.6 +/- 0.3, 3.1 +/- 0.4, 4.8 +/- 2.7 micrograms/g wet wt.). After another 6 successive weeks of cisplatin administration, 55% of mice died. The renal platinum levels and BUN of the survivors were highly increased. The renal tissue revealed histologically acute renal failure. However the renal concentration of platinum was decreased to a low level of 1.1 +/- 0.4 micrograms/g wet wt. 4 weeks after the third injection. These results suggested that cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity could be ameliorated by adequate intervals of cisplatin administration.     

灯盏花素对顺铂肾损害的防治及抗氧化的实验

目的观察灯盏花素对小鼠顺铂（cisplatin,DDP）肾损害的防治及抗氧化作用,探究其可能的作用机制。方法以 DDP 8 mg/kg单次腹腔注射制备小鼠肾脏损害模型,再以不同剂量的灯盏花素灌胃,1次/天,连续给药7 d后采样,观察肾脏结构变化,检测血清中肌酐（Scr）、尿素氮（BUN）、丙二醛（MDA）含量及超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性,肾皮质 SOD 及 MDA 的变化。 结果灯盏花素可明显改善顺铂肾损害的小鼠肾脏结构,降低血清Scr、BUN及肾皮质 MDA含量（P<0.05,P<0.01）,而 SOD 活性明显升高（P<0.05）。 结论灯盏花素可明显减轻顺铂引起的肾毒性,其机制可能与抑制顺铂肾损害所致血液和肾皮质脂质过氧化反应增强有关。     

Inhibition of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats by buthionine sulfoximine,a glutathione synthesis inhibitor

Summary DL-Buthionine-(S, R)-sulfoximine (BSO), a glutathione-depleting agent, was found to diminish the nephrotoxic effect of cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum). Pretreatment of rats with BSO (4 mmol/kg s. c.) 2 h prior to cisplatin, either as a single dose of 5 mg/kg or at a daily dose of 2.5 mg/kg for 3 consecutive days, resulted in diminished elevations of plasma BUN concentration and decreased cisplatin-induced inhibition of renal -glutamylcysteine synthetase and -glutamyl transpeptidase activity measured 6 days following treatment. Administration of BSO prior to cisplatin at 7.5 mg/kg did not significantly alter the effect of cisplatin on either BUN concentration or enzyme activity. The influence of BSO pretreatment on the antitumor activity of cisplatin was studied using implantation of a murine bladder cancer (MBT-2) in C3H mice. Pretreatment of mice with BSO (5 mmol/kg) did not influence cisplatin antitumor efficacy.     

Glutathione administration against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity does not modify its cytotoxic activity

Glutathione (GSH) is an intracellular thiol compound which has been shown to protect against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, in animal models and clinical trials. In order to determine whether GSH interferes with cisplatin activity, the lymphoma L5178Y was implanted in 50 DBA/2 mice, and then they were treated with cisplatin with or without previous GSH. Two similar experiments were carried out with three different groups: Group 1: Control group without cisplatin; Group 2: Treatment with cisplatin without GSH, and Group 3: GSH administration prior to cisplatin. Tumor area and survival have been considered as parameters to measure the activity of cisplatin. The average Values of tumor areas in the mice pretreated with GSH were not significantly different from those corresponding to the group treated with cisplatin alone. Sixty days survival was 55% and 73% in the groups pretreated with GSH and with cisplatin alone respectively, the difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, GSH administration prior to cisplatin does not modify its cytotoxic activity.