Analgesic actions of dynorphin A(1–13) antiserum in the rat brain stem

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of dynorphin A(1–13) antiserum when microinjected into an active hyperalgesic region within the rat brain stem. When administered within the dorsal posterior mesencephalic tegmentum (DPMT) of intact conscious rats, dynorphin A(1–13) antiserum produced rapid onset and persistent prolongation of a low intensity thermally evoked tail avoidance response (LITETAR). These analgesic actions of the dynorphin A(1–13) antiserum appeared to be dose dependent. These studies support previous hypotheses about the existence of tonically active brain stem opioid hyperalgesic processes. Further, the results provide indirect evidence for a potential role of brain stem dynorphin(s) in facilitating pain.     

The colocalization of substance P and prodynorphin immunoreactivity in neurons of the medial preoptic area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial nucleus of the amygdala of the Syrian hamster

To determine the extent of colocalization of substance P (SP) and prodynorphin peptides within neurons of the medial nucleus of the amygdala (AMe), medial bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTm) and medial preoptic area (MPOA), we incubated colchicine-treated Syrian hamster brain tissue in an antiserum mixture containing rat anti-SP antibody combined with 1 of 3 rabbit antibodies against prodynorphin peptides: anti-dynorphin A(1-17), anti-dynorphin B(1-13) or anti-C-peptide. This was followed by incubation in a secondary antiserum mixture containing fluorescein-labelled anti-rabbit and rhodamine-labelled anti-rat antibodies. Sections were viewed with an epifluorescence microscope using blue light excitation for fluorescein and green light excitation for rhodamine. Colocalization of SP and prodynorphin labelling was observed in neurons of the caudal parts of AMe, BNSTm and MPOA, areas which are essential for male mating behavior. The colocalization was most extensive in the dorsolateral part of the caudal MPOA, the caudodorsal part of the BNSTm, and in the posterodorsal subdivision of AMe. Although all 3 dynorphin peptides coexisted with SP in these areas, dynorphin B did so less than C-peptide, and dynorphin A less than dynorphin B.     

Prodynorphin peptide distribution in the forebrain of the Syrian hamster and rat: a comparative study with antisera against dynorphin A, dynorphin B, and the C-terminus of the prodynorphin precursor molecule

The neuroanatomical distribution of the prodynorphin precursor molecule in the forebrain of the male Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) has been studied with a novel antiserum directed against the C-terminus of the leumorphin [dynorphin B (1-29)] peptide product. C-peptide staining in sections from colchicine-treated hamsters is compared to staining in sections from untreated animals. In addition, the pattern of C-peptide immunostaining in hamster brain is compared to that in the rat brain. Finally, the C-peptide immunolabeling patterns in hamsters and rats are compared to those obtained with antisera to dynorphin A (1-17) and dynorphin B (1-13). Areas of heaviest prodynorphin immunoreactivity in the hamster include the hippocampal formation, lateral septum, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial preoptic area, medial and central amygdaloid nuclei, ventral pallidum, substantia nigra, and numerous hypothalamic nuclei. Although this C-peptide staining pattern is similar to dynorphin staining reported previously in the rat, several species differences are apparent. Whereas moderate dentate gyrus granule cell staining and no CA4 cell staining have been reported in the rat hippocampal formation, intense immunostaining in the dentate gyrus and CA4 cell labeling are observed in the hamster. In addition, the medial preoptic area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and medial nucleus of the amygdala stain lightly for prodynorphin-containing fibers and cells in the rat, compared to heavy cell and fiber staining in the hamster in all three of these regions. In the rat there is no differential staining between tissues processed with the C-peptide, dynorphin A, and dynorphin B antisera, but numerous areas of the hamster brain show striking differences. In most hamster brain areas containing prodynorphin peptides, the C-peptide antiserum immunolabels more cells and fibers than the dynorphin B antiserum, which in turn labels more cells and fibers than dynorphin A antiserum. However, exceptions to this hierarchy of staining intensity are found in the lateral hypothalamus, substantia nigra, arcuate nucleus, and habenula. The differences in staining patterns between rat and hamster are greatest when C-peptide antiserum is used; apparent species differences are present, though less pronounced, in dynorphin B- and dynorphin A-immunostained material.     

Rostral and caudal ventricular infusion of antibodies to dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-8): effects on electrically-elicited feeding in the rat

Lateral ventricular injection of antibodies to dynorphin A(1-13) was previously shown to elevate lateral hypothalamic stimulation frequency threshold for eliciting feeding behavior. The antibodies utilized in that study cross-react completely with dynorphin A(1-17) and, to a lesser extent, dynorphin A(1-8). In the present study, highly specific antibodies to dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-8) were infused into the lateral ventricle and mesopontine aqueduct to determine which biologically active dynorphin A fragment mediates feeding and at what level of the CNS this activity is likely to occur. Both antibodies were found to elevate the feeding threshold. Dynorphin A(1-8) antibodies were effective at both injection sites while dynorphin A(1-17) antibodies were only effective at the lateral ventricular site. These findings suggest that feeding-related dynorphin A(1-17) activity may occur predominantly within the forebrain, while dynorphin A(1-8) activity occurs within the brainstem. Only the dynorphin A(1-8) antibodies, infused into the aqueduct, produced a naloxone-like pattern of progressive elevation in serially determined thresholds; this pattern was previously interpreted to reflect a reduction in consummatory reward. Dynorphin A(1-8) activity within some brainstem structure(s) may therefore contribute prominently to the opioid mechanism whose mediation of the hedonic response to food was previously inferred from naloxone antagonism.     

Dynorphin-mediated antinociceptive effects of L-arginine and SIN-1 (an NO donor) in mice

The antinociceptive response of mice to the amino acid L-arginine (L-ARG) has been attributed to either an opioid mechanism or a non-opioid but nitric oxide (NO)-dependent mechanism. Earlier it was reported that the mechanism of nitrous oxide-induced antinociception involved opioid components and was also dependent on brain NO. This study was designed to determine whether the antinociceptive effects of L-ARG and the NO donor 3-morpholinosydnoimine (SIN-1) might be mediated by brain mechanisms similar to those that are responsible for nitrous oxide (N(2)O) antinociception. L-ARG and SIN-1 were administered to mice intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.), and antinociception was assessed using the acetic acid abdominal constriction test. Both L-ARG and SIN-1 caused dose-related antinociceptive effects that were blocked by naloxone and norbinaltorphimine. The antinociceptive effects of both SIN-1 and L-ARG were also blocked to a greater extent by i.c.v. administration of a rabbit antiserum against rat dynorphin 1-13 than an antiserum against methionine-enkephalin, suggesting that the SIN-1 and L-ARG effects may be related to stimulated release of dynorphin. The antinociceptive effect of L-ARG was antagonized by an inhibitor of neuoronal NO synthase enzyme, indicating that L-ARG had to be converted to NO for its antinociceptive action. These findings indicate that the mechanisms of antinociceptive action of L-ARG and SIN-1 are both mediated by dynorphin and dependent on NO.     

Immunocytochemical evidence for the presence of met-enkephalin and leu-enkephalin distinct neurons in the brain of the elasmobranch fish Scyliorhinus canicula

Immunohistochemical methods have been used to investigate the distribution of various opioid peptides derived from mammalian proenkephalin in the central nervous system of Scyliorhinus canicula. The results indicate that both Leu- and Met-enkephalin-immunoreactive peptides are present in the dogfish brain. In contrast, enkephalin forms similar to Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe or Met-enkephalin-Arg-Gly-Leu, and mammalian α-neo-endorphin, dynorphin A (1–8), dynorphin A (1–13), and dynorphin A (1–17) were not detected. Met- and Leu-enkephalin immunoreactivities were found in distinct neurons of the telencephalon and hypothalamus. In particular, cell bodies reacting only with the Met-enkephalin antiserum were localized in the preoptic nucleus and in the suprachiasmatic region of the hypothalamus. Conversely, cell bodies reacting only with the Leu-enkephalin antiserum were localized in the pallium and the nucleus lobi lateralis hypothalami. Several areas of the telencephalon and diencephalon exhibited both Met- and Leu-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity, but the two immunoreactive peptides were clearly contained in distinct perikarya. The overall distribution of Met-enkephalin-immunoreactive elements in the dogfish brain exhibited similarities to the distribution of proenkephalin-derived peptides previously reported for the brain of tetrapods. The fact that Met- and Leu-enkephalin-like peptides were detected in distinct neurons, together with the absence of dynorphin-related peptides, suggests the existence of a novel Leu-enkephalin-containing precursor in the dogfish brain. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Characterization of big dynorphins from rat brain and spinal cord

To examine the processing of products of the dynorphin gene in the central nervous system, immunoreactive (ir) dynorphin (Dyn) A, Dyn B, Dyn A-(1-8), alpha- and beta-neo-endorphin (alpha- and beta-Neo) in rat brain and spinal cord were measured, using specific antisera after gel filtration and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Three peaks of Mr about 8, 4, and 2 kDa for ir-Dyn A and ir-Dyn B, and one peak of Mr less than 2 kDa for ir-Dyn A-(1-8), ir-alpha-, and ir-beta-Neo were found both in the brain and in the spinal cord. The 8 kDa peak was recognized by Dyn A and Dyn B antisera and, after hydrolysis by proline-specific endopeptidase, by beta-Neo antiserum. The 8 kDa peak was recognized by a monoclonal antibody against the amino terminal sequence Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe of all opioid peptides and by an antiserum directed toward the carboxyl terminus of Dyn B, indicating that it contains, from the amino terminal tyrosine of neo-endorphin to the carboxyl-terminal threonine of Dyn B, all 3 opioid peptide regions in the prodynorphin. By means of proline-specific endopeptidase hydrolysis, we also found a big dynorphin precursor (Mr approximately equal to 26 kDa) in both brain and spinal cord.     

A specific radioimmunoassay for the opioid peptide dynorphin B in neural tissues

Dynorphin-32 was recently isolated from porcine pituitary and shown to consist of dynorphin A (the originally isolated dynorphin heptadecapeptide) at the amino terminus, followed by Lys-Arg (a putative signal for proteolytic cleavage) and then a tridecapeptide, dynorphin B, at the carboxyl terminus. Dynorphin B, like dynorphin A, contains leucine enkephalin. The present report describes and validates a radioimmunoassay for dynorphin B using an antiserum, “13S”, that does not crossreact with other known opioid peptides. Immunoreactive dynorphin B was estimated in rat and porcine neural tissues and found to be 2–3 fold higher than reported values for dynorphin A. Distribution based on tissue concentration was similar to that of dynorphin A, with very high concentrations in neurointermediate pituitary. Small quantities of antiserum “13S” are available to investigators upon request.     

Structure-activity analysis of dynorphin A toxicity in spinal cord neurons: intrinsic neurotoxicity of dynorphin A and its carboxyl-terminal, nonopioid metabolites

Dynorphin A [dynorphin A (1-17)] is an endogenous opioid peptide that is antinociceptive at physiological concentrations. Levels of dynorphin A increase markedly following spinal cord trauma and may contribute to secondary neurodegeneration. Both kappa opioid and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists can modulate the effects of dynorphin, suggesting that dynorphin is acting through kappa opioid and/or NMDA receptor types. Despite these findings, few studies have critically examined the mechanisms of dynorphin A neurotoxicity at the cellular level. To better understand how dynorphin affects cell viability, structure-activity studies were performed examining the effects of dynorphin A and dynorphin A-derived peptide fragments on the survival of mouse spinal cord neurons coexpressing kappa opioid and NMDA receptors in vitro. Time-lapse photography was used to repeatedly follow the same neurons before and during experimental treatments. Dynorphin A caused significant neuronal losses that were dependent on concentration (> or = 1 microM) and duration of exposure. Moreover, exposure to an equimolar concentration of dynorphin A fragments (100 microM) also caused a significant loss of neurons. The rank order of toxicity was dynorphin A (1-17) > dynorphin A (1-13) congruent with dynorphin A (2-13) congruent with dynorphin A (13-17) (least toxic) > dynorphin A (1-5) ([Leu(5)]-enkephalin) or dynorphin A (1-11). Dynorphin A (1-5) or dynorphin A (1-11) did not cause neuronal losses even following 96 h of continuous exposure, while dynorphin A (3-13), dynorphin A (6-17), and dynorphin A (13-17) were neurotoxic. The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine) (10 microM) significantly attenuated the neurotoxic effects of dynorphin A and/or dynorphin-derived fragments except dynorphin A (13-17), suggesting that the neurotoxic effects of dynorphin were largely mediated by NMDA receptors. Thus, toxicity resides in the carboxyl-terminal portion of dynorphin A and this minimally includes dynorphin A (3-13) and (13-17). Our findings suggest that dynorphin A and/or its metabolites may contribute significantly to neurodegeneration during spinal cord injury and that alterations in dynorphin A biosynthesis, metabolism, and/or degradation may be important in determining injury outcome.     

Effects of antibodies to dynorphin A and beta-endorphin on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation in ad libitum fed and food-deprived rats

Many laboratories have reported that systemically administered naloxone has little or no effect on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LH ICSS). In the present study, lateral ventricular infusion of beta-endorphin antiserum and a high dose of naloxone (100 micrograms) produced small but significant increases in stimulation frequency threshold for LH ICSS. beta-Endorphin activity, mediated by a non-mu (e.g. delta or epsilon) receptor, may therefore be involved in the reinforcement of self-stimulation behavior. When rats are deprived of food for 24 h, LH ICSS thresholds decline. Under this condition, systemic naloxone elevates the LH ICSS threshold, often returning it to the pre-deprivation level. In the present study, lateral ventricular infusion of dynorphin A(1-13) antiserum similarly reversed the threshold-lowering effect of food deprivation. The effects of systemic naloxone and intraventricular dynorphin A antiserum on LH ICSS, which are specific to food-deprived animals, may be related to previous findings that these two treatments elevate LH stimulation threshold for eliciting feeding behavior. Results of the ICSS and stimulation-induced feeding studies suggest a model for the mediation of incentive stimuli by dynorphin A activity that is afferent to LH 'reward' neurons and positively gated by 'hunger'. An hypothesized role for 'hunger'-gated dynorphin A release in potentiating the hedonic response to alimentary stimuli and drugs of abuse is discussed.     

Involvement of tachykinin NK1 receptors in nociceptin-induced hyperalgesia in mice.

Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nociceptin at small doses (3.0 and 30.0 fmol) produced a significant hyperalgesic response as assayed by the tail-flick test. This hyperalgesic effect peaked at 15 min following i.t. administration of nociceptin (3.0 fmol) and returned to control level within 30 min. Hyperalgesia elicited by nociceptin was inhibited dose-dependently by i.t. co-administration of tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists, CP-99,994 and sendide. A significant antagonistic effect of [D-Phe7, D-His9] substance P (6-11), a selective antagonist for substance P, was observed against the nociceptin-induced hyperalgesia. Pretreatment with i.t. substance P antiserum and i.t. capsaicin resulted in a complete block of the reduced threshold produced by nociceptin. The NK2 receptor antagonist, MEN-10,376 and pretreatment with neurokinin A antiserum did not alter the behavioural effect of nociceptin. The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, dizocilpine (MK-801) and D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV), and L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, failed to inhibit nociceptin-induced hyperalgesia. The results obtained suggest that the hyperalgesic effect of nociceptin may be mediated through tachykinin NK1 receptors in the spinal cord.     

Dynorphin A (2-13) improves mecamylamine-induced learning impairment accompanied by reversal of reductions in acetylcholine release in rats

Accumulating evidence indicates that the endogenous opioid peptides dynorphin A (1-17) and synthetic dynorphin A (1-13) interact not only with opioid receptors but also with as yet poorly characterized non-opioid binding sites. Dynorphin A (1-13) improved impairments of learning and memory via not only kappa-opioid receptor-mediated, but also 'non-opioid' mechanisms. In the present study, the effects of des-tyrosine(1) dynorphin A (2-13) as a non-opioid metabolite of dynorphin A, and dynorphin A (1-13) on mecamylamine-induced impairment of the acquisition of learning in rats were investigated using a step-through type passive avoidance task. Further, hippocampal acetylcholine release was examined using in vivo microdialysis. Mecamylamine significantly shortened the step-through latency when given 30 min before the acquisition trial. Not only dynorphin A (1-13) but also dynorphin A (2-13) attenuated the mecamylamine-induced impairment of the acquisition of learning. The effect of dynorphin A (2-13) was not blocked by pre-treatment with nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), a selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist. Dynorphin A (2-13) completely abolished the decrease in the extracellular acetylcholine concentration induced by mecamylamine and this effect was not blocked by nor-BNI. Taken together with our previous findings, the present results may indicate that dynorphin A (2-13) improves impairment of learning and/or memory in 'non-opioid' mechanisms and dynorphin A (1-13) ameliorates impairment of the acquisition of learning via not only kappa-opioid receptor-mediated mechanisms but also 'non-opioid' mechanisms, by regulating the release of extracellular acetylcholine.     

Opioid and nonopioid mechanisms may contribute to dynorphin's pathophysiological actions in spinal cord injury

It has been suggested that the opioid dynorphin, an endogenous agonist for kappa-opiate receptors, contributes to secondary tissue damage after spinal cord injury. To evaluate this hypothesis further, effects of intrathecally administered dynorphin (Dyn) A-(1-17), dynorphin antiserum, or the kappa-selective opiate antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) were studied in rats subjected to standardized impact trauma to the thoracic spinal cord. Effects of intrathecal Dyn A-(1-17) were also compared to those of Dyn A-(2-17), which is inactive at opiate receptors, in uninjured and injured animals. Both Dyn A-(1-17) and Dyn A-(2-17) produced motor dysfunction in uninjured rats, but Dyn A-(1-17) was approximately 2.5 times more potent. At lower doses of Dyn A-(1-17), paraparesis was markedly attenuated by nor-BNI; nor-BNI was less effective at higher doses of Dyn A-(1-17) and did not modify the motor dysfunction produced by Dyn A-(2-17). Treatment with dynorphin antiserum significantly improved outcome after trauma as compared to control treatment with normal rabbit serum or leucine-enkephalin antiserum. Dyn A-(1-17), but not Dyn A-(2-17) at similar doses, exacerbated neurological dysfunction after spinal cord injury. Pretreatment with nor-BNI attenuated neurological dysfunction after traumatic spinal cord injury to a similar degree in rats administered saline or Dyn A-(1-17). These observations support the hypothesis that dynorphin contributes to certain pathophysiological changes after traumatic spinal cord injury through both opiate-receptor (kappa-receptor)-mediated and nonopioid mechanisms.     

Participation of opiate receptors located in the nucleus tractus solitarii in the hypotension induced by alpha-methyldopa

The local administration of the opiate receptor antagonist, naltrexone, into the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) inhibited the hypotension induced by systemically injected alpha-methyldopa in conscious rats. In addition, the local injection into the NTS of a beta-endorphin antiserum but not of antisera against [Met5]enkephalin and dynorphin A(1-13) prevented the alpha-methyldopa-induced hypotension. These results suggest a role of opiate receptors in the NTS, or in a closely located medullary site, in the centrally mediated hypotension induced by alpha-methyldopa.     

Dynorphin A(1-13) modulates apomorphine-induced behaviors using multidimensional behavioral analyses in the mouse

The effects of intracerebroventricular injection of dynorphin A(1-13) on apomorphine-induced behavioral changes were investigated in the mouse using multidimensional behavioral analyses based upon a capacitance system. Although lower doses (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg) of apomorphine were without marked effects on behaviors, a 0.56 mg/kg dose of the drug evoked a significant increase in rearing behaviors. Furthermore 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg doses of apomorphine produced a marked increment in linear locomotion, circling and rearing. Dynorphin A(1-13) (3.0 or 10.0 microgram) itself had no effects on behaviors. The apomorphine (0.56 and 1.0 mg/kg)-induced increase in rearing behaviors was clearly inhibited by treatment with dynorphin A(1-13) (3.0 and 10.0 microgram). Simultaneously, the marked increases in linear locomotion and circling were displayed by apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg) plus dynorphin A(1-13) (10.0 microgram). The effects of dynorphin A(1-13) (10.0 microgram) on the apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg)-induced increase in rearing were entirely reversed by the opioid antagonist Mr2266. These results suggest that the antagonistic effects of dynorphin A(1-13) on the apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg)-induced increase in rearing are mediated via opioid receptors, possibly K-sites.     

Antibodies to dynorphin A(1-13) but not beta-endorphin inhibit electrically elicited feeding in the rat

Highly specific antibodies to dynorphin A(1-13), infused into the lateral ventricle, elevated brain stimulation threshold for eliciting feeding behavior. Antibodies to beta-endorphin had little or no effect. Temporal analysis of the anorectic action indicated a striking similarity to the effect of systemically administered naloxone. These findings suggest that central dynorphin is involved in the control of ingestive behavior and that the anorectic action of naloxone may result from antagonism of dynorphinergic transmission.     

Intrathecal dynorphin A administration causes pressor responses in rats associated with an increased resistance to spinal cord blood flow

Hemodynamic responses (blood pressure, as well as cardiac output (CO), peripheral and CNS blood flow changes measured via radioactive microspheres) were analyzed in anesthetized rats 2 min following intrathecal (IT) administration (10 microliters) of either 5-ion control solution or 20 nmol of dynorphin A(1-13) into the lower thoracic space (T10-T12). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) significantly increased within 2 min following IT dynorphin A(1-13) due to rise in total peripheral resistance, whereas CO significantly declined. Two minutes post-IT-dynorphin A(1-13) administration spinal cord blood flow also significantly decreased for 2 cm anterior and 1 cm posterior from the tip of the spinal catheter, which reflected a significant elevation in tissue flow resistance of spinal cord vessels in spite of the reduction of CO. As well, tissue blood flow resistance was also increased at this time in the kidneys and adrenal glands. The results indicate that within 2 min after intrathecal dynorphin A(1-13) administration an acute increase in blood flow resistance of spinal cord vessels around the tip of the spinal catheter occurs, at a time when the animal is also hypertensive. It is suggested that the associated pressor response may, in part, be caused by dynorphin A evoking localized ischemia.     

Modulation of central nervous system actions of corticotropin-releasing factor by dynorphin-related peptides

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and dynorphin-related peptides are co-localized within a subset of hypothalamic neurons suggesting the possibility of their co-release. Therefore, studies were performed in conscious unrestrained rats to examine whether dynorphin-related peptides modify the central nervous system (CNS) actions of CRF on sympathetic nervous activity and cardiovascular function. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of dynorphin A1-8 (0.1 and 1.0 nmol) did not alter arterial pressure (AP) or heart rate (HR). I.c.v. injection of dynorphin A1-13 (0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol) produced transient elevations of HR but did not significantly affect AP. I.c.v. administration of dynorphin A1-17 (0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol) elicited delayed (10-15 min) and transient elevations of AP and HR. CRF (0.15 nmol, i.c.v.) produced immediate and sustained elevations of AP, HR and plasma catecholamine levels. Upon simultaneous administration, 0.1 nmol of dynorphin A1-17, but not 0.1 nmol of dynorphin A1-8 or dynorphin A1-13, markedly attenuated CRF-induced elevations of AP, HR, and plasma catecholamine levels. The results suggest that selected dynorphin-related peptides may modify the CNS actions of CRF.     

Dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and spinal opioid antinociceptive tolerance.

The nonopioid actions of spinal dynorphin may promote aspects of abnormal pain after nerve injury. Mechanistic similarities have been suggested between opioid tolerance and neuropathic pain. Here, the hypothesis that spinal dynorphin might mediate effects of sustained spinal opioids was explored. Possible abnormal pain and spinal antinociceptive tolerance were evaluated after intrathecal administration of [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO), an opioid mu agonist. Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws (during the DAMGO infusion) and a decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids (tolerance), signs also characteristic of nerve injury. Spinal DAMGO elicited an increase in lumbar dynorphin content and a decrease in the mu receptor immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn, signs also seen in the postnerve-injury state. Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum blocked tactile allodynia and reversed thermal hyperalgesia to above baseline levels (i.e., antinociception). Spinal dynorphin antiserum, but not control serum, also reestablished the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal morphine. Neither dynorphin antiserum nor control serum administration altered baseline non-noxious or noxious thresholds or affected the intrathecal morphine antinociceptive response in saline-infused rats. These data suggest that spinal dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and acts to reduce the antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids (i.e., tolerance). The data also identify a possible mechanism for previously unexplained clinical observations and offer a novel approach for the development of strategies that could improve the long-term use of opioids for pain.     

Dynorphin A (1-13) neurotoxicity in vitro: opioid and non-opioid mechanisms in mouse spinal cord neurons

Dynorphin A is an endogenous opioid peptide that preferentially activates kappa-opioid receptors and is antinociceptive at physiological concentrations. Levels of dynorphin A and a major metabolite, dynorphin A (1-13), increase significantly following spinal cord trauma and reportedly contribute to neurodegeneration associated with secondary injury. Interestingly, both kappa-opioid and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists can modulate dynorphin toxicity, suggesting that dynorphin is acting (directly or indirectly) through kappa-opioid and/or NMDA receptor types. Despite these findings, few studies have systematically explored dynorphin toxicity at the cellular level in defined populations of neurons coexpressing kappa-opioid and NMDA receptors. To address this question, we isolated populations of neurons enriched in both kappa-opioid and NMDA receptors from embryonic mouse spinal cord and examined the effects of dynorphin A (1-13) on intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and neuronal survival in vitro. Time-lapse photography was used to repeatedly follow the same neurons before and during experimental treatments. At micromolar concentrations, dynorphin A (1-13) elevated [Ca2+]i and caused a significant loss of neurons. The excitotoxic effects were prevented by MK-801 (Dizocilpine) (10 microM), 2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid (100 microM), or 7-chlorokynurenic acid (100 microM)--suggesting that dynorphin A (1-13) was acting (directly or indirectly) through NMDA receptors. In contrast, cotreatment with (-)-naloxone (3 microM), or the more selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (3 microM), exacerbated dynorphin A (1-13)-induced neuronal loss; however, cell losses were not enhanced by the inactive stereoisomer (+)-naloxone (3 microM). Neuronal losses were not seen with exposure to the opioid antagonists alone (10 microM). Thus, opioid receptor blockade significantly increased toxicity, but only in the presence of excitotoxic levels of dynorphin. This provided indirect evidence that dynorphin also stimulates kappa-opioid receptors and suggests that kappa receptor activation may be moderately neuroprotective in the presence of an excitotoxic insult. Our findings suggest that dynorphin A (1-13) can have paradoxical effects on neuronal viability through both opioid and non-opioid (glutamatergic) receptor-mediated actions. Therefore, dynorphin A potentially modulates secondary neurodegeneration in the spinal cord through complex interactions involving multiple receptors and signaling pathways.