Cancer risks in women with 2 breast or ovarian cancers: clues to genetic cancer susceptibility.

Women diagnosed with 2 cancers of the breast and/or ovary are at higher risk of developing subsequent cancers. Using registrations from the Thames Cancer Registry, we quantified the risks at different cancer sites. Increased risks were found for cancers that are part of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour spectrum: oropharyngeal cancer, malignant melanoma of the skin (BRCA2) and colon cancer (BRCA1). We also found significantly increased risks of myeloid leukaemia (probably due to radiotherapy) and of cancer of the corpus uteri (which may be due to hormonal factors).     

MAP3K1及LSP1基因单核苷酸多态与中国北方汉族绝经前妇女乳腺癌风险相关性

目的:探讨MAP3K1及LSP1基因单核苷酸多态与中国北方汉族绝经前妇女乳腺癌风险的关系。方法:采用多重单碱基延伸单核苷酸多态性分型技术(Snapshot)分析方法,检测280例绝经前乳腺癌患者和287例绝经前正常对照者MAP3K1基因rs889312和LSP1基因rs3817198多态性位点基因型,并比较不同基因型与乳腺癌风险的关系。结果:MAP3K1基因rs889312和LSP1基因rs3817198多态性位点基因型频率在乳腺癌和对照样本之间未存在显著差异(P=0.937、P=0.323)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,对于MAP3K1的rs889312位点,与AA携带者相比,AC携带者、CC携带者和AC+CC基因型携带者与乳腺癌的患病危险无关(OR=0.814,95%CI=0.537-1.236,P=0.335;OR=0.999,95%CI=0.627-1.594,P=0.998;OR=0.876,95%CI=0.591-1.298,P=0.509);对于LSP1的rs3817198位点,与TT携带者相比,CT携带者、CC携带者和CT+CC基因型携带者与乳腺癌的患病危险无关(OR=0.832,95%CI=0.565-1.223,P=0.349;OR=0.651,95%CI=0.108-3.936,P=0.640;OR=0.839,95%CI=0.573-1.229,P=0.369)。结论:上述两个基因MAP3K1和LSP1位点多态性与中国北方汉族绝经前妇女乳腺癌易感性之间无明显相关性。     

Novel breast cancer risk alleles and endometrial cancer risk

Genome-wide association studies have identified several novel risk alleles for breast cancer. We hypothesized that genetic variants that are associated with breast cancer, a hormone-related disease, would also be associated with endometrial cancer, another hormone-related disease. We conducted a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study and the Women's Health Study to investigate the associations between these 7 newly identified risk alleles for breast cancer and endometrial cancer risk using 692 invasive endometrial cancer cases and 1,723 matched controls. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the risk of endometrial cancer. In contrast to the breast cancer findings, we did not observe an increased risk of endometrial cancer. We observed an inverse association among rs2981582 (FGFR2) variant carriers [OR= 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.95)]. We also observed a nonsignificant inverse association with rs889312 (MAP3K1) variant carriers [OR = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.68-1.05)] and rs1219648 (FGFR2) variant carriers [OR= 0.86 (95% CI: 0.69-1.06) and endometrial cancer risk. We did not observe associations with the other single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and endometrial cancer risk. Replication studies investigating these polymorphisms and endometrial cancer risk are warranted. However, our findings do suggest the potential importance of biological differences between endometrial and breast cancer with respect to the genes identified in the scans. The molecular mechanisms underlying these differences remain to be defined.     

Genetic susceptibility and gastric cancer risk

The aim of the present paper is to review and evaluate, in a comprehensive manner, the most recent published evidence on the contribution of genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer risk in humans. We have identified all studies available in MEDLINE published up to October 2001. Only studies carried out in humans and comparing gastric cancer cases with at least 1 standard control group were included in the analysis. We were able to find 31 articles based on 25 case-control studies carried out in Caucasian, Asian and African populations. Most of the studies assess the effect of genes involved in detoxifying pathways (n = 12) and inflammatory responses (n = 7). The most widely studied is the GSTM1 null polymorphism. Only a very few studies have evaluated the risk of gastric cancer associated with genes acting on mucosa protection, oxidative damage and DNA repair. The most consistent results are the increased gastric cancer risk associated with IL1B and NAT1 variants, which may account for up to 48% of attributable risk of gastric cancer. Only polymorphisms at HLA-DQ, TNF and CYP2E genes may confer some protective effect against gastric cancer. The most important limitations that preclude definitive conclusions are (i) the lack of appropriate control of potential sources of bias (only 5 population-based studies have been published so far); (ii) the low number of cases analyzed (14 studies included fewer than 99 cases); and (iii) the low number of studies (n = 3) offering concomitant analysis of genetic susceptibility and exposure to relevant cofactors (Helicobacter pylori infection, diet and smoking). We conclude that the scientific data on the role of genetic factors in gastric cancer risk are promising. The lack of association reported so far should be considered with caution due to significant limitations in study design. Cohort studies taking into account simultaneously the different genetic and environmental factors potentially involved in gastric tumorigenesis are needed to ascertain not only the relative contribution of these factors to tumor development but also the contribution of their putative interactions.     

Validating genetic risk associations for ovarian cancer through the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

The search for genetic variants associated with ovarian cancer risk has focused on pathways including sex steroid hormones, DNA repair, and cell cycle control. The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) identified 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes in these pathways, which had been genotyped by Consortium members and a pooled analysis of these data was conducted. Three of the 10 SNPs showed evidence of an association with ovarian cancer at P⩽0.10 in a log-additive model: rs2740574 in CYP3A4 (P=0.011), rs1805386 in LIG4 (P=0.007), and rs3218536 in XRCC2 (P=0.095). Additional genotyping in other OCAC studies was undertaken and only the variant in CYP3A4, rs2740574, continued to show an association in the replication data among homozygous carriers: OR_{homozygous(hom)}=2.50 (95% CI 0.54-11.57, P=0.24) with 1406 cases and 2827 controls. Overall, in the combined data the odds ratio was 2.81 among carriers of two copies of the minor allele (95% CI 1.20–6.56, P=0.017, p_het across studies=0.42) with 1969 cases and 3491 controls. There was no association among heterozygous carriers. CYP3A4 encodes a key enzyme in oestrogen metabolism and our finding between rs2740574 and risk of ovarian cancer suggests that this pathway may be involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Additional follow-up is warranted.     

MAP3K1基因rs16886165位点多态性与乳腺癌分子亚型遗传易感性的关系

目的 作为一种高度异质性的恶性肿瘤,乳腺癌不同分子亚型临床特征、形态学表现和复发转移机制各异,但尚无MAP3K1基因多态性与乳腺癌亚型遗传易感性的研究报道.本研究拟深入探讨MAP3K1基因rs16886165位点T→G多态性与中国南方汉族女性散发性乳腺癌及其4种分子亚型易感性的关系.方法 应用MassARRAY(R)-IPLEX 单核苷酸多态性(single nucleotide polymorphism,SNP)分型技术对2009-04-20-2014-07-20来自南方医科大学南方医院(149例)、广州军区总医院(190例)、南昌大学第一附属医院(100例)、重庆市肿瘤医院(170例)的609例南方汉族女性乳腺癌患者和635名(南方医科大学南方医院333名,广州军区总医院55名,南昌大学第一附属医院90名,重庆市肿瘤医院157名)同期健康女性MAP3K1基因rs16886165位点进行基因分型;SNPStats在线分析软件比较两组在等位基因和基因型分布频率上的差异,非条件Logistic回归评价多态性位点与乳腺癌易感性的相关性;根据雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)、孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)和人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor-2,HER2)的免疫组化结果,将病例分为Luminal A、Luminal B、HER2富集型和三阴型,并进行分层分析.结果 Recessive 模型(与T/T+T/G相比)结果提示,MAP3K1基因rs16886165位点G/G基因型与乳腺癌的易感性升高存在统计学关联(OR=1.45,95％CI:1.01～2.08);但分层分析结果显示,rs16886165位点多态性仅与Luminal B型乳腺癌的易感性存在统计学关联,无论是Co-dominant模型中与T/T基因型相比(ORG/G=2.10,95％CI:1.18～3.73),还是Recessive 模型中与T/T+T/G相比(ORG/G=1.98,95％CI:1.14～3.46),携带G/G基因型患者发生Luminal-B型乳腺癌的风险均显著增加.结论 MAP3K1基因rs16886165位点纯合基因型(G/G)与南方汉族女性散发性乳腺癌中的Luminal-B亚型易感性相关.     

Association of gBRCA1/2 mutation locations with ovarian cancer risk in Japanese patients from the CHARLOTTE study

Whether germline (g) breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations are located within or outside the ovarian cancer cluster region (OCCR) (1380‐4062 bp for gBRCA1, and between 3249‐5681 bp and 6645‐7471 bp for gBRCA2) may influence risk variations for ovarian cancers. This ad hoc analysis of the CHARLOTTE epidemiological study in Japan assessed the distribution of gBRCA1/2 mutations in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, and investigated an association between gBRCA1/2 mutation locations and ovarian cancer risk. Differences in patient background and clinical characteristics in subgroups stratified by gBRCA1/2 mutation locations were also evaluated. We analyzed the data of 93 patients (14.7%) from the CHARLOTTE study who were positive for gBRCA1/2 mutations. After excluding 16 cases with L63X founder mutation, 28 (65.1%) of gBRCA1 mutations were within the OCCR. Of 30 gBRCA2 mutations, 15 (50.0%) were within the OCCR. Of 27 patients (one patient excluded for unknown family history) with gBRCA1 mutations located in the OCCR, 11 (40.7%) had a family history of ovarian cancer; the proportion of patients with a family history of ovarian cancer and gBRCA1 mutations outside the OCCR was lower (13.3%). Sixty percent of patients with gBRCA1 mutations outside the OCCR had a family history of breast cancer; the proportion of patients with a family history of breast cancer and gBRCA1 mutations within the OCCR was relatively lower (33.3%). Understanding the mutation locations may contribute to more accurate risk assessments of susceptible individuals and early detection of ovarian cancer among gBRCA mutation carriers.     

BRCA2 Arg372Hispolymorphism and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

The BRCA2 372 HH genotype defined by the BRCA2 N372H nonconservative amino acid substitution polymorphism was recently reported to be associated with a small increased risk of breast cancer. We investigated whether this polymorphism was associated with ovarian cancer risk by conducting British and Australian case-control comparisons in parallel, including a total sample of 1,121 ovarian cancer cases and 2,643 controls. There was no difference in genotype frequency between control groups from the 2 studies (p = 0.9). The HH genotype was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer in both studies, and the risk estimate for the pooled studies was 1.36 (95% CI 1.04-1.77, p = 0.03). There was also a suggestion that this risk may be greater for ovarian cancers of the serous subtype for both studies, with an OR (95% CI) of 1.66 (1.17-2.54) for the 2 studies combined (p = 0.005). The BRCA2 372 HH genotype appears to be associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer of a similar magnitude to that reported for breast cancer.     

Breast cancer predisposing alleles in Poland

Summary Mutant alleles of several genes in the DNA repair pathway have been found to predispose women to breast cancer. From a public health perspective, the importance of a given allele in a population is determined by the frequency of the allele and by the relative risk of breast cancer that it confers. In Poland founder alleles of the BRCA1, CHEK2 and NBS1 genes have been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, but the relative contribution of each of these alleles to the overall breast cancer burden has not yet been determined. We screened 2012 unselected cases of breast cancer and 4000 population controls for 7 different mutations in these genes. Overall, a mutation was found in 12% of the cases and in 6% of the controls. Mutations in BRCA1 and CHEK2 contributed in approximately equal measure to the burden of breast cancer in Poland. A BRCA1 mutation was present in 3% of the cases. The missense BRCA1 mutation C61G was associated with a higher odds ratio for breast cancer (OR=15) than were either of the truncating BRCA1 mutations 4153delA (OR=2.0) and 5382insC (OR=6.2). In contrast, a higher odds ratio was seen for truncating CHEK2 mutations (OR=2.1) than for the missense mutation I157T (OR=1.4). This study suggests that cancer risks may be specific for particular alleles of a susceptibility gene and that these different risks should be taken into account by genetic counselors.     

Factors influencing ovulation and the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

The role of the lifetime number of ovulatory cycles has not been evaluated in the context of BRCA‐associated ovarian cancer. Thus, we conducted a matched case–control study to evaluate the relationship between the cumulative number of ovulatory cycles (and contributing components) and risk of developing ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers (1,329 cases and 5,267 controls). Information regarding reproductive and hormonal factors was collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate all associations. We observed a 45% reduction in the risk of developing ovarian cancer among women in the lowest vs. highest quartile of ovulatory cycles (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.41–0.75, p = 0.0001). Breastfeeding for more than 12 months was associated with a 38% (95% CI 0.48–0.79) and 50% (95% CI 0.29–0.84) reduction in risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. For oral contraceptive use, maximum benefit was seen with five or more years of use among BRCA1 mutation carriers (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40–0.63) and three or more years for BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.22–0.83). Increasing parity was associated with a significant inverse trend among BRCA1 (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.79–0.96; p‐trend = 0.005) but not BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81–1.19; p‐trend = 0.85). A later age at menopause was associated with an increased risk in women with a BRCA1 mutation (OR trend = 1.18; 95% CI 1.03–1.35; p = 0.02). These findings support an important role of breastfeeding and oral contraceptive use for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer among women carrying BRCA mutations.     

Women at risk of ovarian cancer: attitudes towards and expectations of the familial ovarian cancer clinic

Familial ovarian cancer clinics are a recent development and little is known about the characteristics of women who attend. One hundred and ninety-seven women with a family history of ovarian cancer completed a questionnaire prior to their initial attendance at the Familial Ovarian Cancer Clinic in Edinburgh. Issues relating to screening procedures were the most commonly cited barriers to attendance, with a proportion finding gynaecological examination embarrassing (17.0%) or uncomfortable (18.0%). Expectations of the clinic were high in terms of access to resources and information. The vast majority of women would prefer to have regular screening (94.7%) and genetic testing (93.2%) if it were available. Attitudes to prophylactic surgery and chemoprevention were more diverse, but would be considered by 54.3% and 43.9% of respondents respectively. Although the current screening procedure for ovarian cancer is of unproven efficacy, a high proportion of women believed in its ability to reduce mortality (77.9%) and to detect tumours at an early stage (65.8%). There was a trend for women to believe this more strongly at follow-up. This study highlights the need to make women more aware of the limitations of current ovarian cancer screening techniques, particularly where the alternative management strategy of prophylactic surgery might otherwise be dismissed.     

Oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk among carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations

Women with mutations of the genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives protect against ovarian cancer in general, but it is not known whether they protect against the disease in carriers of these mutations. We obtained self-reported lifetime histories of oral contraceptive use from 451 women who carried mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios associated with oral contraceptive use, comparing the histories of 147 women with ovarian cancer (cases) to those of 304 women without ovarian cancer (controls) who were matched to cases on year of birth, country of residence and gene (BRCA1 vs BRCA2). Reference ages for controls had to exceed the ages at diagnosis of their matched cases. After adjusting for parity, the odds-ratio for ovarian cancer associated with use of oral contraceptives for at least 1 year was 0.85 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.53-1.36). The risk decreased by 5% (1-9%) with each year of use (P for trend=0.01). Use for 6 or more years was associated with an odds-ratio of 0.62 (0.35-1.09). These data support the hypothesis that long-term oral contraceptive use reduces the risk of ovarian cancer among women who carry mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients from China: ethnic‐related mutations in BRCA1 associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer

BRCA1/2 are cancer predisposition genes involved in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Mutation carriers display an increased sensitivity to inhibitors of poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP). Despite a number of small‐size hospital‐based studies being previously reported, there is not yet, to our knowledge, precise data of BRCA1/2 mutations among Chinese ovarian cancer patients. We performed a multicenter cohort study including 916 unselected consecutive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients from eastern China to screen for BRCA1/2 mutations using the next‐generation sequencing approach. A total of 153 EOC patients were found to carry pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA1/2, accounting for an overall mutation incidence of 16.7% with the predominance in BRCA1 (13.1%) compared with BRCA2 (3.9%). We identified 53 novel pathogenic mutations, among which the c.283_286delCTTG and the c.4573C > T of BRCA1 were both found in two unrelated patients. More importantly, the most common mutation found in this study, c.5470_5477del8 was most likely to be Chinese population‐related without an apparent founder origin. This hot‐spot mutation was presumably associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Taken together, germline BRCA1/2 mutations were common in Chinese EOC patients with distinct mutational spectrum compared to Western populations. Our study contributes to the current understanding of BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence worldwide. We recommend BRCA1/2 genetic testing to all Chinese women diagnosed with EOC to identify HBOC families, to provide genetic counseling and clinical management for at‐risk relatives. Mutation carriers may also benefit from PARP‐targeted therapies.     

HLA-class II haplotype associations with ovarian cancer

The development of cancer is a multistep process that is characterized by the accumulation of genetic alterations in cells and changed cellular interactions with the surrounding healthy tissues. The human immune system is believed to be intrinsically involved in this process. The correlation of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class I and II haplotypes with tumorigenesis is documented in a variety of tumors. However, few data exist on the possible association of specific HLA-class II alleles or haplotypes with ovarian cancer. In our sample of 52 Caucasian patients with primary ovarian carcinoma and 239 female healthy local controls, we observed a significantly increased incidence of the HLA-class II haplotypes DRB1*0301 - DQA1*0501 - DQB1*0201 (p < 0.001) and DRB1*1001 - DQA1*0101 - DQB1*0501 (p < 0.001) in the patients. Our data suggest that HLA-class II loci or individual HLA-class II haplotypes may be involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.     

Thyroid cancer GWAS identifies 10q26.12 and 6q14.1 as novel susceptibility loci and reveals genetic heterogeneity among populations

Thyroid cancer is the most heritable cancer of all those not displaying typical Mendelian inheritance. However, most of the genetic factors that would explain the high heritability remain unknown. Our aim was to identify additional common genetic variants associated with susceptibility to this disease. In order to do so, we performed a genome‐wide association study in a series of 398 cases and 502 controls from Spain, followed by a replication in four well‐defined Southern European case‐control collections contributing a total of 1,422 cases and 1,908 controls. The association between the variation at the 9q22 locus near FOXE1 and thyroid cancer risk was consistent across all series, with several SNPs identified (rs7028661: OR = 1.64, p = 1.0 × 10^?22, rs7037324: OR = 1.54, p = 1.2 × 10^?17). Moreover, the rare alleles of three SNPs (rs2997312, rs10788123 and rs1254167) at 10q26.12 showed suggestive evidence of association with higher risk of the disease (OR = 1.35, p = 1.2 × 10^?04, OR = 1.26, p = 5.2 × 10^?04 and OR = 1.38, p = 5.9 × 10^?05, respectively). Finally, the rare allele of rs4075570 at 6q14.1 conferred protection in the series studied (OR = 0.82, p = 2.0 × 10^?04). This study suggests that heterogeneity in genetic susceptibility between populations is a key feature to take into account when exploring genetic risk factors related to this disease.     

BRCA1 mutation testing for Japanese patients with ovarian cancer in breast cancer screening

From February 1996 to April 1998, 2967 women received screening for breast cancer in the gynecologic ambulatory practice of the Hokkaido University Hospital. In 116 Japanese women with epithelial ovarian cancer, mutation analysis of BRCA1 exon 11 in genomic DNA was performed by the stop codon (SC) assay and DNA sequence analysis. Clinicopathological factors were also investigated in these patients. The aim of this study was to examine the advantages of performing BRCA1 mutation testing for ovarian cancer patients during breast cancer screening. We achieved a high detection rate (6.0) of patients with germline mutations in BRCA1. The high frequencies of breast ovarian cancer syndrome, serous adenocarcinoma, high histological grades, advanced FIGO stages, and breast cancer as double cancer were found to be characteristic of ovarian cancer with germline mutations in BRCA1. These characteristics may assist physicians in selecting BRCA1 mutation testing for ovarian cancer patients. The mean age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer was 51.0 and 51.2 years in the groups with and without mutation, respectively, and no difference was found in age at diagnosis. All of the nine living female mutation carriers were offered the options of increased surveillance or prophylactic surgery, and all chose the former. We have performed breast cancer screening and/or ovarian cancer screening every 6 months for these carriers. This may allow another advantage in establishing a relationship of mutual trust with a patient from a series of responsible follow-ups.     

Improved survival in BRCA2 carriers with ovarian cancer

Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate survival of ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations compared to those without mutations in a population-based sample of incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases. Methods Follow-up for vital status was performed on a population-based sample of 232 women with incident epithelial ovarian cancer recruited between December 13, 2000 and September 30, 2003 in the Tampa Bay area. Survival analysis using Cox regression was performed on (1) all 232 cases and (2) the 209 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases. Results of the two analyses were similar, thus data involving the 209 invasive epithelial cancer cases are presented, as this was judged to be more clinically relevant. Results In the multivariate analysis, BRCA status and stage were statistically significant, and were adjusted for in the survival analysis model. The Kaplan–Meier method estimated expected survival at 4 years of 83% of BRCA2 carriers compared to 37% of BRCA1 carriers and 12% of non-carriers. There was a statistically significant difference between BRCA2 carriers and non-carriers (p = 0.013). No statistically significant survival differences were seen for BRCA1 carriers when compared with either BRCA2 carriers or non-carriers. Conclusion These data suggest that BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer may have better survival than BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers. The etiology of this possible survival advantage is currently unknown. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to clarify their etiology and clinical significance. Article precis Based on a population-based sample of 232 ovarian cancer patients, BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer may have better survival than BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers.     

FGFR3基因单核苷酸多态与绝经前乳腺癌易感性的关联研究

目的 探讨FGFR3基因单核苷酸多态(SNPs)与女性绝经前乳腺癌的风险关系。方法 采用多重单碱基延伸SNP分型技术(Snapshot)检测FGFR3基因的rs2234909和rs3135848的SNP基因型在绝经前乳腺癌患者和绝经前正常女性人群中的频率,并分析不同SNP基因型与绝经前乳腺癌发病的风险关系。结果 FGFR3基因rs2234909和rs3135848的SNP基因型的频率在乳腺癌与对照组间无统计学差异(P＞0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,对于rs2234909位点,相比较于TT基因型,TC和TC+CC基因型和乳腺癌的发病风险无显著相关性(OR=1.035,95% CI:0.680~1.575,P=0.874;OR=0.985,95% CI:0.638~1.521,P=0.945);对于rs3135848位点,相比较于TT基因型,TC、CC和TC+CC基因型与乳腺癌的发病风险无关(OR=1.177,95% CI:0.846~1.636,P=0.333;OR=0.948,95% CI:0.287~3.137,P=0.931;OR=1.162,95% CI:0.548~1.112,P=0.360)。rs2234909位点突变的乳腺癌患者与未突变者相比,组织学分级(显性模型:P=0.032;共显性模型:P=0.024)以及Ki67指数(显性模型:P=0.056;共显性模型:P=0.044)显著增高;rs3135848位点突变及两位点均突变与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征无显著相关性(P＞0.05)。结论 FGFR3基因的rs2234909和rs3135848两位点基因多态性与乳腺癌易感性无明显相关性;而rs2234909位点突变在绝经前乳腺癌患者中与组织学分级和Ki67指数呈正相关,可能提示预后不良。     

Cancer risk perceptions and distress among women attending a familial ovarian cancer clinic

Of 230 women referred to a familial ovarian cancer clinic, 196 (85%) completed a questionnaire before they attended. The data collected included pre-counselling risk perceptions and an assessment of distress. Respondents were more likely to underestimate (44%) than overestimate (19%) their risk. Those with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) were particularly likely to underestimate their ovarian cancer risk. The variables assessed in this study - sociodemographic, family history, distress, anxiety proneness, coping style and beliefs about health control - explained little of the observed variation in accuracy of risk perception. On the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) 30% of the sample obtained scores above the cut-off (>/= 6) recommended for screening for 'case-level' psychological distress. Women exhibiting case-level distress were more likely to overestimate their risk (OR = 2.3). On univariate analysis low internal locus of control was associated with 'case-level' distress (P = 0.008). On multiple regression the best predictors of 'caseness' were high-trait anxiety, being a graduate and inaccurate risk perception. There was no difference in the level of distress shown by women with HBOC vs. those with a history of ovarian cancer only. Implications of these findings for the counselling needs of the women are discussed. The effectiveness of the clinic in improving the accuracy of risk perceptions and relieving distress is being assessed.