Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 125, neuron specific enolase, and squamous cell antigen level determinations in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge the role of tumor marker determination in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions has not been established definitively. The current article reports the results of a study of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell antigen (SCC), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions of diverse etiologies. METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients with pleural effusions (43 malignant, 47 tuberculous, 32 miscellaneous benign, and 24 paramalignant) were studied prospectively. Levels of CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CEA, NSE, and SCC were measured by radioimmunoassay in the pleural fluid in all patients and in the serum in 118 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the serum and pleural fluid levels of tumor markers with the exception of CA 125, which was higher in the pleural fluid. With maximum specificity, the highest sensitivity in the diagnosis of pleural malignancy was obtained with a combination of CYFRA 21-1 (with a cutoff value of 150 U/L), CEA (with a cutoff value of 40 ng/mL), and CA 125 (with a cutoff value of 1000 ng/mL) in pleural fluid. NSE and SCC added no diagnostic value. The simultaneous use of tumor markers and cytology in pleural fluid increased the sensitivity from 55.8% to 81%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a combination of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, and CA 125 in the pleural fluid can be a useful addition to pleural cytology in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.     

Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of six tumor markers in patients with pleural effusion. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and total sialic acid (TSA) were assayed in 74 patients with pleural effusions (44 malignant and 30 benign). All tumor markers except TSA and NSE were increased in both serum and pleural fluid of patients with malignant diseases. Using the cut-off values 3 ng/ml, 14 U/ml, 5 U/ml, 8 ng/ml and 70 mg/dl for pleural fluid CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1 and TSA, respectively, the sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of these tumor markers were as follows: CEA; 52/77, CA 15-3; 80/93, CA 19-9; 36/83, CYFRA 21-1; 91/90, TSA; 80/67, for differentiating malignant effusions from benign. When CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 combined, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100 and 83%, respectively). Classifying the malignant effusions as bronchial carcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma, CEA was shown to have the highest sensitivity and specificity (88 and 90%, respectively) while the combination of CEA with other tumor markers increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. According to our results, tumor markers are not suitable for the differential diagnosis of malignancy.     

血清五种肿瘤标志物联合检测在肺癌诊断中的意义

目的 联合检测CEA、CA-125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和SCC等5种血清肿瘤标志物水平,探讨其在肺癌临床诊断中的意义。方法 采集112例肺癌患者血清样本,其中48例肺腺癌,33例肺鳞状细胞癌和31例小细胞肺癌;同时采集32例良性患者血清样本为对照组,所有诊断均有组织学证实。用电化学发光法检测血清的CEA、CA-125、CYFRA21-1、NSE水平,用微粒子酶联免疫发光法检测SCC水平。计算灵敏度、特异度和阳性预测值。结果 血清CEA、CA-125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和SCC单项检测的灵敏度为54.46%、67.86%、39.29%、38.39%和28.57%,特异度为93.75%、96.88%、93.75%、87.50%和96.88%。血清五项肿瘤标志物联合检测阳性预测值为92.17%,联合检测灵敏度和特异度分别为94.64%和71.87%。结论 血清CEA、CA-125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和SCC水平联合检测对于肺癌的诊断有临床价值,且联合检测可以提高肺癌诊断的敏感性,提高肺癌的检出率。     

肿瘤标志物联合检测在良恶性胸腔积液鉴别诊断中的价值

 目的　探讨胸腔积液4种肿瘤标志物联合检测在良恶性胸腔积液鉴别诊断中的价值。方法　采用电化学发光免疫法检测126例胸腔积液患者（其中恶性组52例,良性组74例）癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原125（CA125）、糖类抗原15-3（CA15-3）和细胞角蛋白片段19（CYFRA21-1）水平, 并计算上述指标单独和与CEA联合检测在诊断中的敏感度、特异度、准确度和约登指数（YI）。结果　恶性组4种肿瘤标志物水平均明显高于良性组（P＜0.01）。单项检测各种肿瘤标志物的敏感度以CA125最高（90.4 %）,特异度以CYFRA21-1最高（79.7 %）,诊断准确度以CEA和CYFRA21-1最高（71.4 %）,YI以CEA最高（0.41）。联合检测较单项检测敏感度、准确度和YI明显提高,其中CEA、CYFRA21-1和CA15-3三项联合效果最好,敏感度为92.3 %,特异度为78.4 %,准确度为84.1 %,YI值最高为0.71。四项联合敏感度为94.2 %,特异度为75.7 %,准确度为83.3 %,YI值为0.70,与三项联合结果相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论　单项检测的诊断价值有限,CEA、CYFRA21-1和CA15-3三项联合效果最好、最经济,可指导患者恰当选择进一步的侵入性检查手段。     

DNA倍体联合肿瘤标志物检测在胸腔积液诊断中的应用

目的探讨DNA倍体分析联合肿瘤标志物在良、恶性胸腔积液诊断中的价值。方法将108例胸腔积液分为恶性组（68例）和良性组（40例）。除常规细胞学检查外,以流式细胞术（flowcytometry,FCM）检测患者胸腔积液中的DNA倍体,采用化学发光法测定胸腔积液中CEA、CA199、NSE、CYFRA211、SCC、CA125等肿瘤标志物含量。比较DNA倍体联合肿瘤标志物诊断与细胞学诊断的优劣。结果DNA倍体诊断恶性胸腔积液的敏感性、特异性分别为70．6％、95．0％,Youden’s指数为0．656,敏感度稍高于细胞学诊断的65．1％,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。除NSE外,其他5种肿瘤标志物在恶性胸腔积液中浓度均高于良性,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。CYFRA211、CEA、CAl99、CAl25、SCC、NSE的AUC分别为：0．893,0．828,0．759,0．691,0．524及0．490;COV分别为：149．2ng／mL,53．6ng／mL,78．2IU／mL,1559．0IU／mL,48．72ng／mL及78．3ng／mL;敏感性分别为：44．1％,44．1％,35．3％,29．4％,13．2％,5．9％,特异性均为100％。4种肿瘤标志物联合检测＋DNA倍体检测的敏感性为88．2％（60／68）,特异性95％,显著高于细胞学诊断。结论DNA倍体联合CEA、CA199、CYFRA211和CA125检测诊断恶性胸腔积液有较高敏感性,具有定量、快速、价廉、易标准化的特点,且操作简单。     

胸水和血清CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和Pro-GRP联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值

目的:探讨联合检测肺癌胸水和血清中癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原125(CA125)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、神经原特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和胃泌素释放肽前体(Pro-GRP)5 种肿瘤标志物水平在肺癌临床诊断中的应用价值,以期提高鉴别良恶性胸水的能力。方法:用电化学发光法检测93例肺癌患者和54例肺炎性疾病患者的血清及胸水标本CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和Pro-GRP水平。结果:癌性胸水组中CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和Pro-GRP 5种肿瘤标志物平均水平与炎性胸水组比较,差别均有统计学意义(P<0.05);癌性胸水组中CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125的含量远远高于炎性胸水组（20~600倍）(P<0.01)。肺癌胸水组中CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和Pro-GRP 5种肿瘤标志物水平与肺癌血清组比较,差别均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。肺癌胸水组中CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125的含量远远高于肺癌血清组（7~80倍）(P<0.01),相比与正常对照组更是有200倍以上的增高(P<0.01),因此胸水中CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125百倍左右的升高提示恶性肿瘤的存在。将93例癌性胸水和血清分为腺癌、鳞癌和小细胞癌。腺癌、鳞癌和小细胞癌胸水组中CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和Pro-GRP 5种肿瘤标志物含量明显高于炎性胸水组(P<0.01);腺癌胸水组中CEA含量明显高于鳞癌和小细胞癌(P<0.01);鳞癌胸水组中CYFRA21-1含量明显高于腺癌和小细胞癌(P<0.01);小细胞癌胸水组中NSE和Pro-GRP含量明显高于腺癌和鳞癌(P<0.01)。CA125含量在胸水组中腺癌、鳞癌含量明显高于小细胞癌(P<0.01)。5 种标志物单项及联合检测的灵敏度肺癌胸水组均高于肺癌血清组,肺癌胸水中5项联合检测后灵敏度可达99.11%。结论:肺癌组胸水中CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1、NSE和Pro-GRP 5种肿瘤标志物联合检测有利于良恶性胸水的鉴别诊断,联合检测可以提高肺癌诊断的灵敏度,当肿瘤标志物显著升高时,CEA可作为肺腺癌的肿瘤标志物;CYFRA21-1可作为肺鳞癌的肿瘤标志物;NSE和Pro-GRP可作为小细胞癌的肿瘤标志物;CA125可作为非小细胞肺癌的肿瘤标志物。     

Evaluation of pleural CYFRA 21-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.

CYFRA 21-1 assay, measuring cytokeratin 19 fragments, was compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay, as an addition to cytological analysis for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. Both markers were determined with commercial enzyme immunoassays in pleural fluid from 196 patients. Cytological analysis and/or pleural biopsy confirmed the malignant origin of the effusion in 99 patients (76 carcinomas, nine pleural mesotheliomas and 14 non-epithelial malignancies). Effusions were confirmed as benign in 97 patients (33 cardiac failures, 39 infectious diseases--including 12 tuberculosis-- and 25 miscellaneous effusions). Both markers were significantly higher in malignant than in benign effusions. All the patients with non-epithelial malignancies presented CYFRA and CEA values lower than the 95% diagnostic specificity thresholds (100 and 6 ng ml(-1) respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity in the group of carcinomas and mesotheliomas was similar for CYFRA (58.8%) and CEA (64.7%). However, CEA had a significantly higher sensitivity in carcinomas (72.4% vs 55.3%), while CYFRA had a clearly higher sensitivity in mesotheliomas (89.9% vs 0%). Interestingly, 12 out of the 16 malignant effusions with a negative cytology were CEA and/or CYFRA positive. Regarding their high diagnostic sensitivity and their complementarity, CEA and CYFRA appear to be very useful for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions when cytology is negative.     

New approaches in the diagnostic procedure of malignant pleural effusions

The content of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (Ca 19-9), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (Ca 15-3) and the expression of LewisY related carbohydrate antigens in benign and malignant pleural effusion were determined. These included 35 malignant pleural effusions: 13 breast cancers, 12 lung cancers (6 squamous cell carcinomas, 5 adenocarcinomas and 1 microcytoma), 2 mesotheliomas, 1 epithelioma, 1 kidney cancer, 1 hepatocarcinoma, 1 colon carcinoma, 3 lymphomas, 1 osteosarcoma and 9 benign pleural effusions. We showed that pleural fluid content of CEA, Ca 19-9 and Ca 15-3 were higher in malignant than in benign effusions. However CEA levels in squamous lung cancers were very high in both serum and pleural fluids whereas its levels were only slightly above the cut-off in breast cancers and in lung adenocarcinomas. Serum and pleural fluid Ca 15-3 values were higher in breast and in lung cancers with the highest values in the patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, the LewisY related carbohydrate antigens, evaluated by the reactivity of the cell extracts to MAb B3, were expressed only in breast cancers. These data suggest that pleural fluid content of CEA, and Ca 15-3 associated with the immunoblotting of cell extracts with MAb B3 appear to be very useful to improve the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.     

检测肿瘤标志物ProGRP、NSE、CYFRA21-1、CEA对胸腔积液鉴别诊断价值的研究

背景与目的 恶性胸腔积液多由肺癌引起，肿瘤标志物检测对其鉴别诊断有一定临床价值。本研究的目的是探讨血清及胸腔积液胃泌素前体释放肽片断31—98（ProGRP）、神经元烯醇化酶（NSE）、细胞角蛋白19（cYFRA21—1）和癌胚抗原（CEA）单项或联合检测对肺癌所致恶性胸腔积液鉴别诊断与组织学分型的临床价值。方法 将肺癌所致的恶性胸腔积液患者按原发肿瘤类型分为小细胞肺癌（SCLC）组、肺腺癌组及肺鳞癌组，同时以良性胸腔积液组、健康对照组作为对照。评估胸腔积液ProGRP、NSE、CYFRA21—1和CEA单项及联合检测对各组恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值。结果 血清及胸腔积液ProGRP、NSE、CYFRA21—1、CEA在各恶性胸腔积液组的水平均明显高于对照组（P〈0．01）。SCLC组检测胸腔积液ProGRP的Youden指数和诊断准确性最高；肺腺癌和肺鳞癌组则以胸腔积液CEA＋CYFRA21—1联合检测（按平行试验）的Youden指数及诊断准确性最高。结论胸腔积液肿瘤标志物系列（ProGRP、NSE、CYFRA21—1、CEA）检查对恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断与组织学分型有很大的临床价值。胸腔积液ProGRP为SCLC所致恶性胸腔积液的最佳肿瘤标志物；胸腔积液cEA＋cYFRA21—1联合检测（按平行试验）为肺腺癌、肺鳞癌所致恶性胸腔积液较好的辅助诊断指标。     

肿瘤标志物对癌性胸腔积液诊断的价值

目的探讨肿瘤标志物在癌性胸腔积液诊断中的价值。方法应用免疫放射分析法对108例癌性胸腔积液和90例良性胸腔积液的CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE和CA153含量进行检测,并对结果进行比较分析。结果癌性胸腔积液中四种肿瘤标志物指标明显高于良性组(P<0.01),四项联检后的敏感性、特异性及准确性明显升高。结论肿瘤标志物CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE和CA153四项联检在癌性胸腔积液的诊断中具有明确的意义。     

胸水CA125、CA199、CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1、CA72-4对原发性肺癌的诊断价值

目的探讨胸水中糖链抗原125（CA125）、糖链抗原199（CA199）、癌胚抗原（CEA）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21—1）和糖链抗原72-4（CA72-4）在原发性肺癌并胸腔积液的诊断和鉴别诊断、病理分型中的价值。方法采用电化学免疫荧光发光法同时检测90例原发性肺癌并胸腔积液患者（恶性胸腔积液组）和64例良性胸腔积液患者（良性胸腔积液组）胸水中CA125、CA199、CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1和CA72-4水平。结果恶性胸腔积液组各胸水肿瘤标志物水平均高于良性胸腔积液组（P〈0．05）,其中CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE分别对腺癌、鳞癌、小细胞肺癌最敏感。联合检测以CEA＋NSE＋CYFRA21-1最优,可使敏感性达98．9％,阴性预测值至96．6％,准确性提高至76．0％。结论胸水肿瘤标志物在原发性肺癌的诊断中价值较高,其中CEA的诊断价值最大,联合检测诊断准确性优于单项检测。     

Tumor markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, SCC and NSE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer as an aid in histological diagnosis and prognosis. Comparison with the main clinical and pathological prognostic factors.

CEA, CA 125, SCC, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE were prospectively studied in 211 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and compared with clinical parameters (age, sex, Karnofsky Index, symptoms and smoking status), histopathological parameters (stage, histology, tumor size and nodal involvement), biological parameters (LDH and albumin) and the therapy used (surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy). Tumor marker sensitivity was CYFRA 21-1: 76%, CA 125: 55%, CEA: 52%, SCC: 33% and NSE: 22%. One of the tumor markers was abnormally high in 87% of the patients with locoregional disease and in 100% of the patients with metastases. Except for NSE, all tumor markers showed a clear relationship with tumor stage and histology and therefore enabled a better histological diagnosis. Abnormal CEA serum levels were mainly found in adenocarcinomas, CA 125 in large-cell lung cancers (LCLC) and adenocarcinomas and SCC in squamous tumors. Eighty-five percent of the patients with SCC levels >2 ng/ml had squamous tumors. Likewise, CA 125 levels <60 U/ml or CEA <10 ng/ml excluded adenocarcinoma or LCLC with a probability of 82 and 91%, respectively.     

六种肿瘤标志物在肺癌胸腔积液中的诊断价值

目的通过对胸腔积液和血清中6种肿瘤标志物的检测及胸腔积液脱落细胞学检查,探讨各指标在肺癌胸腔积液中的诊断价值。方法应用化学发光法和酶联免疫分析法测定50例肺癌和30例肺良性疾病患者的胸腔积液和血清中的癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原19—9（CA19—9）、鳞状细胞癌抗原（SCC）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21—1）、胃泌素前体释放肽（ProGRP）水平,同时对胸腔积液标本进行脱落细胞学检查,并根据受试者工作特性曲线（ROC）建立合理的临床判断临界值。结果肺癌患者胸腔积液中6种肿瘤标志物水平均高于肺良性疾病者,其中CEA、CA19-9、CYFRA21—1、ProGRP水平显著高于肺良性疾病组（P〈0．05）。胸腔积液CEA、血清CYFRA21—1及CEA含量在胸腔积液与血清中的比值（P／S）在各组中的ROC曲线下面积最大。结论胸腔积液CEA、血清CYFRA21—1及CEA的P／S值在鉴别良、恶性胸腔积液中有一定的辅助诊断价值,胸腔积液CEA的诊断价值最大。     

Diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CA 125 assays in pleural effusions: analysis of 116 cases and review of the literature

Levels of tumor markers in pleural effusions may help to establish the diagnosis of pleural malignancy, but the precise diagnostic value of each marker remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of five common pleural fluid tumor markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA) 21-1, cancer antigen (CA) 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125, and to review the literature from the past 15 years. Pleural fluid samples were collected prospectively from 116 patients and assayed for CEA, CYFRA 21-1, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125 levels. A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature from the past 15 years was also done. Effusions were classified as benign or malignant on the basis of their definitive pathologic or cytologic diagnoses. The levels of all pleural tumor markers were statistically significantly higher in the malignant group than in the benign group. The marker with the highest accuracy was CEA (85.3%); CA 15-3, CYFRA 21-1, and CA 19-9 had similar accuracies (75.2%, 72.4%, and 71.5%, respectively), and CA 125 had the lowest accuracy (40.5%). On univariate analysis, tumor-marker combinations did not result in a greater accuracy than that of CEA alone. On multivariate logistic regression, CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 were significant predictors of malignancy. Among the nine reports in the literature comparing 11 different tumor markers, CEA, CA 15-3, and CYFRA 21-1 yielded the best results. We conclude that pleural fluid analysis should include CEA for the diagnosis of malignancy. CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 may serve as alternative options.     

Diagnostic value of tumor markers for differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions of Iranian patients

In order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of tumor markers in differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions, we carried out a prospective study in a group of Iranian people. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) were assayed prospectively in patients with pleural effusion (40 malignant and 37 benign). The highest sensitivity was obtained with a combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3 and CEA in pleural fluid (80%), also with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3, NSE and CEA in pleural fluid (80%). The highest specificity was obtained with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3 and NSE in pleural fluid (100%), and also with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3, NSE and CEA in pleural fluid (100%).     

血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中的应用价值*

目的:探讨SCC 、NSE、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 四项肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值。方法:采用化学发光法对肺癌组132 例、肺良性疾病组48例和正常对照组92例的血清SCC 、NSE 、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 四项肿瘤标志物进行检测及统计学分析。结果:NSE 、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 在肺癌组显著高于肺良性疾病组和正常对照组,SCC 肺癌组高于正常对照组,CEA 和CYFRA21-1肺良性疾病组显著高于正常对照组。CEA 在肺腺癌中的水平较高,NSE 在小细胞肺癌中的水平较高,而SCC 、CYFRA21-1 在肺鳞癌中的水平较高。单项肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中敏感性:NSE>CEA>CYFRA 21-1>SCC;在腺癌中CEA 敏感性最高（58.8%）,鳞癌中CYFRA21-1 敏感性最高（71.4%）,小细胞肺癌中NSE 敏感性最高（50.0%）。 NSE 、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 的ROC 曲线下面积分别为0.928 ± 0.034、0.957 ± 0.026、0.964 ± 0.023,显示诊断准确性较高。SCC 曲线下面积虽然大于0.5,但差异无统计学意义。肿瘤标志物联合检测,可以提高诊断试验的敏感性,在肺癌诊断中NSE 、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 组合敏感性最高（75.6%）,特异性也较好（90.7%）;腺癌诊断中SCC 、NSE 、CEA 组合敏感性最高（73.5%）,鳞癌诊断中NSE 、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 组合敏感性最高（75.8%）,小细胞肺癌中SCC 、NSE 、CYFRA21-1 组合敏感性最高（75.0%）。 结论:SCC 、NSE 、CEA 、CYFRA21-1 对肺癌的诊断均有一定意义,不同病理类型各有特点,选择合适的组合有利于对肺癌的鉴别诊断。      

肿瘤标志物CYFRA21-1、SCC、CEA、NSE、CA125检验在肺癌诊断中的价值

目的:分析肿瘤标志物细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21-1）、鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原（SCC）、癌胚抗原（CEA）、神经特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）以及糖类癌抗原125（CA125）检验在肺癌诊断中的临床应用价值。方法:将2015年11月至2016年11月于我院收治的74例肺癌患者（肺癌组）、74例肺良性肿瘤患者（良性肿瘤组）作为研究对象,同期选择74例到院体检的健康人群作为健康组。三组患者均在空腹状态下抽取4.0 ml静脉血,离心处理后进行实验室检验。对比三组患者中CYFRA21-1、SCC、CEA、NSE以及CA125水平的变化情况。结果:肺癌组的CYFRA21-1、SCC、CEA、NSE以及CA125水平均高于健康组和良性肿瘤组（P<0.05）。非小细胞肺癌患者的CYFRA21-1、SCC、CEA以及CA125水平均高于小细胞肺癌患者。小细胞肺癌患者的NSE水平显著高于非小细胞肺癌患者（P<0.05）。结论:肺癌患者的CYFRA21-1、SCC、CEA、NSE以及CA125水平将会显著增高,通过联合检测CYFRA21-1、SCC、CEA、NSE以及CA125能够在一定程度上提高肺癌疾病的诊断准确率,对于肺癌疾病的临床诊断和筛查具有十分重要的作用。     

Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of tumor markers in fluid and serum and their ratio in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions.

We evaluated the diagnostic utility of simultaneous determination of 5 tumor markers, CEA, CA 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1), in fluid and serum from 101 patients, 52 with pleural effusion (22 malignant) and 49 patients with ascites (14 malignant). Tumor marker concentrations in fluid from patients with malignant effusions were significantly higher than those obtained in benign fluids or serum. However, there are two types of tumor markers: those released/secreted by normal mesothelia such as CA 125 and cytokeratin 19 (higher levels in benign fluids than in serum) and non-released/secreted tumor markers (low concentrations in benign fluids) such as CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3. The fluid/serum (F/S) ratio showed better sensitivity with maximum specificity than a single determination in fluid for CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 19-9, but not for CA 125 and CYFRA. The combination of a F/S ratio greater than 1.2 and a cut-off of 5 ng/ml for CEA, 30 U/ml for CA 15-3 and 37 U/ml for CA 19-9 showed sensitivities of 58, 57 and 44%, respectively, and a specificity of 100%, with a combined sensitivity of 82% for overall effusions and 79% for fluids with negative cytology with a specificity of 100%. In conclusion, the use of the F/S ratio in nonsecreted tumor markers such as CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 improve the sensitivity and specificity and allow standardization of the cut-off.     

胸水中CEA CYFRA21-1 NSE和LDH对肺癌的临床诊断

目的:探讨CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE、LDH水平对癌性胸水的诊断价值。方法:采用电化学发光方法检测胸水中的CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE,采用酶法检测LDH。结果:恶性胸水的CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE、LDH水平明显高于良性胸水(P<0.01),肺腺癌CEA明显高于鳞癌和小细胞肺癌(P<0.01),肺鳞癌CYFRA21-1水平明显高于腺癌(P<0.05)和小细胞肺癌(P<0.01),小细胞肺癌NSE明显高于鳞癌(P<0.01)。4项标志物联合检测的敏感性、准确性均比单项检测高。结论:联合检测胸水中的CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE和LDH对肺癌的诊断具有重要的临床意义。     

DNA倍体联合肿瘤标志物在恶性胸腔积液初筛中的临床价值

目的:探讨DNA倍体联合肿瘤标志物检验恶性胸腔积液的临床价值.方法:70例胸腔积液患者,分为恶性组、良性组.采用全自动细胞分析仪对胸腔积液进行DNA倍体分析,并同时检测NSE、CYFRA21-1、CEA、CA199、SF.结果:恶性胸腔积液中DNA倍体和各肿瘤标志物(NSE、CYFRA21-1、CEA、CA199、SF)的灵敏度分别为80.00%、45.83%、76.67%、60.00%、26.67%、72.00%,特异性分别为82.50%、88.24%、70.97%、95.00%、100.00%、55.17%,准确性分别为82.43%、70.68%、73.77%、80.00%、68.11%、63.64%.组合模型中以DNA倍体串联CEA,DNA倍体并联铁蛋白诊断价值较高.结论:使用DNA细胞全自动检测分析仪对恶性胸腔积液进行DNA倍体测量具有很高的阳性率、灵敏度,如果联合胸腔积液肿瘤标志物中的CEA或SF可提高其临床诊断价值.