MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of screening magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of synchronous contralateral breast cancer in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and July 2001, 182 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (after either core or excisional biopsy with positive or close margins of resection) underwent bilateral contrast material-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with a dedicated bilateral breast multicoil array. The contralateral breast was imaged for cancer screening. Family history of breast cancer, index cancer histology, breast density, and age at diagnosis of first breast cancer were assessed as potential risk factors for synchronous contralateral breast cancer. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8.2%) had a suspicious enhancing lesion depicted in the contralateral breast. Seven patients (3.8%) had malignant results: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four, invasive ductal carcinoma with DCIS in two, and invasive ductal carcinoma in one. Eight patients (4.4%) had benign results: fibrocystic changes in four, atypical ductal hyperplasia in two, atypical lobular hyperplasia and focal lobular carcinoma in situ in one, and ductal hyperplasia in one. Six patients with negative MR findings underwent prophylactic mastectomy; no malignancy was found. No significant differences were noted among patients with true-positive (n = 7), false-positive (n = 8), or negative (n = 167) MR findings with regard to family history of breast cancer (P <.27), index cancer histology (P <.19), breast density (P <.34), or age at diagnosis of first breast cancer (P <.10). CONCLUSION: The preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of using MR imaging of the breast in a screening role, specifically to evaluate the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer to detect mammographically and clinically occult synchronous breast cancer.     

MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience

PURPOSE: To perform magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-compatible vacuum-assisted 9-gauge core-needle biopsy of suspicious enhancing breast lesions identified at MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board granted exempt status for this HIPAA-compliant study and waived the requirement for informed consent. The MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle biopsy findings of 85 lesions in 75 patients aged 31-89 years were retrospectively reviewed. The biopsies were performed as part of the patients' clinical care with a Food and Drug Administration-approved biopsy system and not within a research protocol. All included patients had received a diagnosis of malignant, benign, or high-risk (for cancer) breast tissue at core-needle biopsy and had undergone subsequent surgery or follow-up imaging. MR imaging-guided biopsy results were compared with final histopathologic or follow-up imaging findings. RESULTS: At MR imaging-guided core-needle biopsy, malignancy was identified in 52 (61%) lesions: 35 invasive cancers and 17 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. Four (24%) of the 17 DCIS lesions were upgraded to invasive cancer at excisional biopsy or mastectomy. A high-risk lesion (ie, atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or radial scar) was identified in 18 (21%) cases. Two (25%) of eight atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions were upgraded to DCIS at excision. No malignancy was found in the atypical lobular hyperplasia (n = 2), lobular carcinoma in situ (n = 5), or radial scar (n = 3) lesions. Fifteen (18%) lesions were found to be benign lesions of unknown type at excision or mastectomy. For 13 of these 15 lesions, the benign results were concordant with the imaging findings. Both (two of 86, 2%) discordant cases represented false-negative lesions. The remaining 13 benign lesions were validated at excisional biopsy (n = 9) or follow-up imaging (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Initial experience revealed MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy to be a reasonable alternative to MR imaging-guided wire localization of suspicious lesions identified at MR imaging only, on the basis of published information regarding the latter.     

乳腺MRI在X线检查乳腺阴性腋淋巴结转移癌阳性患者中的应用价值

目的 探讨乳腺MR检查对临床乳腺触诊和X线检查均为阴性的腋淋巴结转移癌患者寻找其乳腺内原发病灶的应用价值.方法 分析33例以腋淋巴结转移癌为首诊表现(临床乳腺触诊和X线检查均为阴性)患者的乳腺MR影像资料,依据美国放射学会的乳腺影像报告和数据系统MRI标准对所有病变进行分析,并将MRI诊断结果与病理进行对照.结果 33例腋淋巴结转移癌患者中,30例临床行乳腺根治术,其中17例经病理证实为乳腺癌,乳腺MRI检出其中的16例,包括10例肿块性病变和6例非肿块性病变,肿块性病变直径0.5～2.6 cm(平均1.5 cm),直径≤1.5 cm者6例;非肿块性病变包括4例导管性强化和2例段性强化;另1例病理切片发现乳腺癌但乳腺MRI为阴性.其余13例行乳腺根治术患者病理检查未发现乳腺癌灶,其中9例乳腺MRI亦呈阴性表现,另4例MRI提示可疑癌灶.余3例临床未行手术治疗的患者,乳腺MRI亦为阴性.以病理诊断为金标准,MR检出乳腺原发癌灶的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为94.1%、69.2%和83.3%.结论 相对于一般乳腺癌而言,隐匿性乳腺癌MRI表现更以小灶性的肿块性病变和导管或段性强化的非肿块性病变为常见表现类型.乳腺MR检查对隐匿性乳腺癌的检出具有较高的敏感度和准确度,应作为这类患者的常规检查手段.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the role of breast MRI in detecting the primary malignancy in patients presenting solely with axillary lymph node metastases. Methods Thirty-three patients with axillary lynph node metastases but negative findings on either physical examination or mammography underwent breast MRI to identify occult breast carcinoma. MRI of the breast was assessed according to BI-RADS criteria. The pathologic diagnosis was made according to the standard criteria by the WHO Classification of Tumor. Results Among 33 patients presenting solely with axillary metastases, 30 patients underwent modified radical mastectomy. Primary breast carcinoma was proven in 17 patients. MRI detected lesions in 16 patients, including 10 masses and 6 non-mass lesions. Size of the masses ranged from 0. 5 to 2. 6 cm (mean 1.5 cm). Six lesions were smaller than 1.5 cm in size. Non-mass lesions showed ductal enhancement in 4 cases and segmental enhancement in 2 cases. One patient with tumor detected by histopathology showed no abnormal enhancement on MRI. No tumor was found at mastectomy in the other 13 womeu, and negative MR findings were revealed in 9. Four cases with suspicious enhancement on MRI had no corresponding primary foci on pathology. Three patients didn't undergo surgical procedure. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of the primary malignancy were 94. 1%,69. 2%, and 83.3%, respectively. Conclusions Small size of mass and ductal or segmental enhancement of non-mass lesion were common MR features of occult malignancy. MRI showed high sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosing occult breast carcinoma. Breast MRI should be taken in search of occult malignancy in patients with axillary metastases.     

乳腺MRI在X线检查乳腺阴性腋淋巴结转移癌阳性患者中的应用价值

目的 探讨乳腺MR检查对临床乳腺触诊和X线检查均为阴性的腋淋巴结转移癌患者寻找其乳腺内原发病灶的应用价值.方法 分析33例以腋淋巴结转移癌为首诊表现(临床乳腺触诊和X线检查均为阴性)患者的乳腺MR影像资料,依据美国放射学会的乳腺影像报告和数据系统MRI标准对所有病变进行分析,并将MRI诊断结果与病理进行对照.结果 33例腋淋巴结转移癌患者中,30例临床行乳腺根治术,其中17例经病理证实为乳腺癌,乳腺MRI检出其中的16例,包括10例肿块性病变和6例非肿块性病变,肿块性病变直径0.5～2.6 cm(平均1.5 cm),直径≤1.5 cm者6例;非肿块性病变包括4例导管性强化和2例段性强化;另1例病理切片发现乳腺癌但乳腺MRI为阴性.其余13例行乳腺根治术患者病理检查未发现乳腺癌灶,其中9例乳腺MRI亦呈阴性表现,另4例MRI提示可疑癌灶.余3例临床未行手术治疗的患者,乳腺MRI亦为阴性.以病理诊断为金标准,MR检出乳腺原发癌灶的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为94.1%、69.2%和83.3%.结论 相对于一般乳腺癌而言,隐匿性乳腺癌MRI表现更以小灶性的肿块性病变和导管或段性强化的非肿块性病变为常见表现类型.乳腺MR检查对隐匿性乳腺癌的检出具有较高的敏感度和准确度,应作为这类患者的常规检查手段.     

乳腺MRI在X线检查乳腺阴性腋淋巴结转移癌阳性患者中的应用价值

目的 探讨乳腺MR检查对临床乳腺触诊和X线检查均为阴性的腋淋巴结转移癌患者寻找其乳腺内原发病灶的应用价值.方法 分析33例以腋淋巴结转移癌为首诊表现(临床乳腺触诊和X线检查均为阴性)患者的乳腺MR影像资料,依据美国放射学会的乳腺影像报告和数据系统MRI标准对所有病变进行分析,并将MRI诊断结果与病理进行对照.结果 33例腋淋巴结转移癌患者中,30例临床行乳腺根治术,其中17例经病理证实为乳腺癌,乳腺MRI检出其中的16例,包括10例肿块性病变和6例非肿块性病变,肿块性病变直径0.5～2.6 cm(平均1.5 cm),直径≤1.5 cm者6例;非肿块性病变包括4例导管性强化和2例段性强化;另1例病理切片发现乳腺癌但乳腺MRI为阴性.其余13例行乳腺根治术患者病理检查未发现乳腺癌灶,其中9例乳腺MRI亦呈阴性表现,另4例MRI提示可疑癌灶.余3例临床未行手术治疗的患者,乳腺MRI亦为阴性.以病理诊断为金标准,MR检出乳腺原发癌灶的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为94.1%、69.2%和83.3%.结论 相对于一般乳腺癌而言,隐匿性乳腺癌MRI表现更以小灶性的肿块性病变和导管或段性强化的非肿块性病变为常见表现类型.乳腺MR检查对隐匿性乳腺癌的检出具有较高的敏感度和准确度,应作为这类患者的常规检查手段.     

MR imaging-guided sonography followed by fine-needle aspiration cytology in occult carcinoma of the breast

OBJECTIVE: In patients with axillary metastases as clinical evidence of possible occult breast cancer, a combined approach of MR imaging, sonography, and aspiration biopsy cytology was evaluated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one women with metastatic adenocarcinoma in their axillary lymph nodes originating from an unknown primary site underwent MR imaging of the breast because physical examination and mammography findings were normal. Twenty of the 31 women had no history of malignancy, 10 had been previously treated for contralateral breast cancer, and one patient had nodal metastases in the contralateral axilla at the time breast cancer was detected. When a contrast-enhancing lesion was revealed on MR imaging of the breast, sonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology were also performed. RESULTS: MR imaging revealed the primary breast cancer in eight (40%) of the 20 patients without a history of malignancy. MR imaging of the breast revealed a second primary cancer in three (27%) of the 11 patients with previous or simultaneous breast cancer. All lesions were identified with sonography and verified by cytology and histology. CONCLUSION: In women with axillary lymph node metastases from adenocarcinoma, MR imaging of the breast should be added to clinical examination and mammography before defining the breast cancer as occult. The combined approach of MR imaging, sonography, and aspiration fine-needle cytology is a good alternative to the MR imaging-guided biopsy.     

Breast MRI for evaluating patients with metastatic axillary lymph node and initially negative mammography and sonography.

OBJECTIVE: We wanted to investigate the ability of breast MR imaging to identify the primary malignancy in patients with axillary lymph node metastases and initially negative mammography and sonography, and we correlated those results with the conventional imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2001 to April 2006, 12 patients with axillary lymph node metastases and initially negative mammography and sonography underwent breast MR imaging to identify occult breast carcinoma. We analyzed the findings of the MR imaging, the MR-correlated mammography and the second-look sonography. We followed up both the MR-positive and MR-negative patients. RESULTS: MR imaging detected occult breast carcinoma in 10 of 12 (83%) patients. Two MR-negative patients were free of carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast during their follow-up period (39 and 44 months, respectively). In nine out of 10 patients, the MR-correlated mammography and second-look sonography localized lesions that were not detected on the initial exam. All the non-MR-correlated sonographic abnormalities were benign. CONCLUSION: Breast MR imaging can identify otherwise occult breast cancer in patients with metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Localization of the lesions through MR-correlated mammography and second-look sonography is practically feasible in most cases.     

Value of combined FDG PET and MR imaging in the evaluation of suspected recurrent local-regional breast cancer: preliminary experience

PURPOSE: To assess the performance and potential clinical effects of combined 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the axilla and brachial plexus in patients suspected of having local-regional breast cancer metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper-body FDG PET and axillary and supraclavicular MR imaging were performed in 10 patients (age range, 45-71 years) with clinical findings suggestive of breast cancer metastases. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Imaging findings were correlated with clinical data and follow-up findings in all patients. Surgical findings were available in four patients. RESULTS: Nine patients had local-regional breast cancer metastases. MR imaging was diagnostic for tumor in five patients and was indeterminate in four patients with axillary or chest wall metastases. With FDG PET, metastatic tumor was positively identified in all nine patients. MR imaging was useful for determining the relationship of metastatic tumor to axillary and supraclavicular neurovascular structures. FDG PET helped confirm metastases in patients with indeterminate MR imaging findings and depicted unsuspected metastases outside the axilla. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and FDG PET are complementary in detecting and characterizing local-regional breast cancer metastases. Combined FDG PET and MR imaging provide useful treatment-planning data for patients clinically suspected of having recurrent axillary or supraclavicular breast cancer.     

False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors

In this study we analyze MR-negative malignant lesions of the breast. A total of 204 patients with palpable and/or mammographic lesions were studied. The MR technique consisted of the turbo FLASH and MP-RAGE subtraction techniques. All patients underwent surgical biopsy and/or mastectomy and all specimens were examined by the correlative radiologic-histologic mapping technique. A total of 208 lesions were evaluated; 145 turned out to be malignant and 63 proved to be benign. Six malignant lesions were misinterpreted as benign on MR imaging; thus, suspicious contrast enhancement was present in 96 % of the lesions detected by mammography, US, or clinical examination. Especially 4 of the 17 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions were misinterpreted (23.5 %). Despite optimal technique, 6 malignant lesions were not identified by MR imaging. The highest prevalence of these MR occult lesions was in the group of DCIS. Although MR imaging has an important role in the evaluation of breast lesions and, primarily, in ruling out malignancy, one should be aware of the fact that false-negative MR findings do occur. Received 8 July 1996; Revision received 7 October 1996; Accepted 6 February 1997     

Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach

PURPOSE: To determine if magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can help determine the therapeutic approach in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast was performed in 463 patients with probably benign lesions (n = 63), suspicious lesions (n = 230), or lesions highly suggestive of malignancy (n = 170) per established clinical, mammographic, and/or ultrasonographic (US) criteria. T1-weighted fast low-angle shot MR imaging was performed before and after administration of gadopenetetate dimeglumine. MR imaging findings were correlated with other imaging results and histopathologic findings. Special attention was paid to multifocality and multicentricity. RESULTS: Histopathologic analysis revealed 143 benign and 405 malignant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 58%, 76%, and 62% for clinical examination; 86%, 32%, and 72% for conventional mammography; 75%, 80%, and 76% for US; and 93%, 65%, and 85% for contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Multifocality in 30 of 42 patients, multicentricity in 24 of 50 patients, and additional contralateral carcinomas in 15 of 19 patients were depicted with MR imaging alone. Due to the MR imaging findings, therapy was changed correctly in 66 patients (14.3%); unnecessary open biopsy was performed in 16 patients (3.5%). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast is highly sensitive for invasive breast cancer. MR imaging may reveal unsuspected multifocal, multicentric, or contralateral breast carcinoma and result in therapy changes.     

Mammography in women with axillary lymphadenopathy and normal breasts on physical examination: value in detecting occult breast carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of mammography in detecting occult carcinoma in patients with axillary adenopathy and normal breasts on physical examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We analyzed the results of mammography performed in 17 patients; all women had palpable axillary lymphadenopathy of unknown origin and all had normal breasts on physical examination. RESULTS. In 10 of the 17 patients, mammographic findings were abnormal. The mammographic finding of axillary adenopathy in seven patients was inconsequential because the nodes were evident on physical examination. Three patients had abnormal mammographic findings that were potentially significant, including one with a poorly defined mass suggestive of breast carcinoma, one with a subcutaneous nodule, and one with parenchymal breast edema. Two of 17 patients had an occult breast cancer. In only one of the patients was the cancer detected on mammography. The other patient had undergone prior left mastectomy and was thought to have metastases to the right axilla from the contralateral breast. Mammographic findings in this latter patient were normal. CONCLUSION. While occult breast carcinoma was relatively common in our series (two of 17 patients), the ability to detect the tumor with mammography was disappointing (one of two patients). This may be explained by the fact that one postmastectomy patient with occult carcinoma had metastatic disease to the contralateral axilla and a normal remaining breast, which was pathologically confirmed at mastectomy. Our experience suggests that mammography is valuable in patients with normal breasts on physical examination who have primary carcinoma involving ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. The procedure should be included in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with axillary adenopathy in order to detect the unusual case of occult breast carcinoma.     

Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess mammography, high-frequency-transducer ultrasonography (US), and color Doppler US for the initial and subsequent evaluation of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of clinical records between January 1989 and December 2003 of women with breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy was performed after waiver of informed consent was obtained. The study was approved by an institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. Mammograms and sonograms were reviewed by two mammographers using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) mammographic and US lexicon. US assessment of the regional lymph node basins, including the axillary, infraclavicular, internal mammary, and supraclavicular regions, was documented. US was used to evaluate response to therapy in the breast and the regional lymph nodes in women who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-three women with 24 cancers that were imaged prior to surgery with mammography (n = 3), US (n = 4), or mammography and US (n = 17) were included in the study. The histologic diagnosis of the primary tumor was invasive ductal cancer in 22 lesions, and the diagnosis was invasive carcinoma in the two other cancers. The median age in this study was 34 years (range, 24-45 years). Of the 20 women who underwent preoperative mammography, findings were positive for malignancy in 18 of 20 (90%) cancers despite dense breast parenchymal patterns (BI-RADS types 3 and 4). A mass in all 21 cancers (100%) was depicted in the 20 women who underwent breast and nodal US. US correctly depicted axillary metastasis in 15 of 18 women who underwent US nodal assessment. Of the 12 patients who were evaluated for response to chemotherapy, US demonstrated complete response in two patients, partial response in three, stable findings in one, and progression of disease in six. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is mammographically evident despite dense parenchymal background. US, when performed, demonstrates all masses and provides information regarding response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Extrahepatic abdominal imaging in patients with malignancy: comparison of MR imaging and helical CT, with subsequent surgical correlation

PURPOSE: To compare state-of-the-art magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with single-phase helical computed tomography (CT) in abdominal screening for extrahepatic disease in patients with proved malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with known malignancy underwent abdominal contrast material-enhanced helical CT and MR imaging from 1994 through 1997. Prospective interpretations of CT scans and MR images were used to assess each modality's sensitivity in depicting malignant extrahepatic tumor at 17 anatomic sites. Imaging findings were compared with surgical results in all patients. RESULTS: Helical CT depicted 101 (66%) of 154 surgically confirmed extrahepatic tumor sites; MR imaging depicted 139 (90%) (P < .001). MR imaging depicted tumor in more patients at 11 of the 17 anatomic sites; at six sites, MR imaging and helical CT were equivalent. MR imaging showed significantly greater depiction of extrahepatic tumor for the peritoneum (P < .05), bowel (P < .01), and mesentery (P < .05). False-negative interpretations would have altered patient care had the extrahepatic tumor remained undetected in 13 patients for helical CT and in six patients for MR imaging. CONCLUSION: State-of-the-art MR imaging can be used for effective abdominal screening for extrahepatic tumor in patients with malignancy. Compared with single-phase helical CT, MR imaging depicted more sites of extrahepatic tumor and was particularly advantageous for the peritoneum, mesentery, and bowel.     

Chest wall recurrence of breast cancer detected by scintimammography

A case of chest wall recurrence of breast cancer detected by scintimammography is presented. A 63-year-old woman who had a right mastectomy for breast carcinoma 24 years earlier was evaluated for left axillary adenopathy. Although it was suspected that a second primary malignancy had developed in the left breast, results of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging of that breast were negative. Scintimammography performed with Tc-99m sestamibi confirmed a normal left breast but revealed a lesion in the right chest wall at the site of the previous mastectomy. This was surgically confirmed as recurrent breast carcinoma, which subsequently altered patient management.     

Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cancer yield, frequency of use, and follow-up compliance of breast MR examinations assessed as "probably benign." MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our MR database of 809 consecutive examinations between January 2003 and June 2004. We identified all examinations that ultimately received an MR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 3 assessment and recommendation for a short-interval follow-up MR with or without an antecedent targeted ultrasound. The clinical indication for breast MR, date of the follow-up examination, follow-up assessment, and any pathology findings through June 2005 were collected from clinical records and radiology and pathology reports. Frequency of BI-RADS 3 use, follow-up compliance, and cancer yield were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 160 out of 809 (20%) examinations comprise the study population. A total of 100 out of 160 (63%) women returned for the recommended follow-up MR, in which three out of 100 (3%) were upgraded to BI-RADS 4 with biopsy recommended. One patient underwent biopsy and the result was benign. A total of seven out of 160 (4%) underwent mastectomy in lieu of MR for known cancer elsewhere in the breast. One out of seven mastectomy specimens contained malignancy that corresponded to the probably benign finding, resulting in a cancer yield of one out of 160 (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that follow-up MR is a valid alternative to biopsy for MR BI-RADS 3 lesions.     

Extrahepatic abdominal imaging in patients with malignancy: comparison of MR imaging and helical CT in 164 patients

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using currently available techniques with contrast-enhanced single-phase helical computed tomography (CT) in depicting extrahepatic disease in patients with malignancy. At two institutions, 164 patients with known or suspected malignancy underwent abdominal imaging with contrast-enhanced helical CT and MR imaging. The prospective interpretations of the CT scans and MR examinations were used to assess the sensitivity of each imaging test in detecting benign and malignant extrahepatic disease at 17 anatomic sites. Imaging findings were compared with results of surgery in 57 patients and with the combined results of image-guided biopsy, follow-up cross-sectional imaging studies, other concurrent imaging tests, and clinical follow-up. For the 164 patients, helical CT scans depicted 221 of 316 (70%) sites of proven extrahepatic tumor compared with 288 sites (91%) (P < 0.0001) for MR imaging. For the 57 patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy, helical CT scans depicted 101 of 154 (66%) findings of surgically confirmed extrahepatic tumor compared with MR imaging, which depicted 139 sites (90%) (P < 0.0001). Anatomic sites at which MR imaging showed a significantly greater detection of extrahepatic tumor included the peritoneum, bowel, and vascular and osseous structures. For depiction of benign extrahepatic disease, there was no significant difference between helical CT and MR imaging. MR imaging, using currently available T1-weighted, RARE T2-weighted, and gadolinium-enhanced imaging, is effective in depicting extrahepatic disease in patients with malignancy. Compared with single-phase helical CT scanning, MR imaging shows an advantage in depicting tumor involving the peritoneum, omentum, bowel, and osseous and vascular structures.     

MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with nipple discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1992 and December 1998, 23 patients with nipple discharge underwent contrast material-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Mammographic findings were negative in 22 of 23 patients and revealed asymmetry in one patient. Galactography was attempted in two patients, with negative findings in one patient and no success in the other. Fifteen of 23 patients underwent excisional biopsy-seven of 15 with MR imaging-guided localization, and one of 15 with mammographic localization. Eight of 23 patients were followed up clinically (range, 7-24 months; mean, 20 months). RESULTS: In 11 of the 15 (73%) patients who underwent excisional biopsy, MR imaging findings correlated with histopathologic findings. MR imaging demonstrated four of six benign papillomas and one of two fibroadenomas as circumscribed, enhancing subareolar masses. Findings of one MR imaging examination were negative, and benign tissue was found at excisional biopsy. MR imaging findings were suspicious in six of the seven patients with excisional biopsy findings of malignancy (regional enhancement [n = 2], ductal enhancement [n = 2], peripherally enhancing mass [n = 1], and spiculated mass [n = 1]). In one of the seven patients, a benign-appearing intraductal mass was identified at MR imaging; excisional biopsy revealed a benign papilloma with an adjacent focus of DCIS. CONCLUSION: MR imaging can help identify both benign and malignant causes of nipple discharge. It potentially offers a noninvasive alternative to galactography.     

COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Axillary and Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Current or Prior Breast Cancer and Other Malignancies: Cross-Sectional Imaging Findings on MRI,CT, and PET-CT

Breast radiologists are increasingly seeing patients with axillary adenopathy related to COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccination can cause levels I–III axillary as well as cervical lymphadenopathy. Appropriate management of vaccine-related adenopathy may vary depending on clinical context. In patients with current or past history of malignancy, vaccine-related adenopathy can be indistinguishable from nodal metastasis. This article presents imaging findings of oncology patients with adenopathy seen in the axilla or neck on cross-sectional imaging (breast MRI, CT, or PET-CT) after COVID-19 vaccination. Management approach and rationale is discussed, along with consideration on strategies to minimize false positives in vaccinated cancer patients. Time interval between vaccination and adenopathy seen on breast MRI, CT, or PET-CT is also reported.     

Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the frequency and significance of foci of enhancement having no corresponding mammographic or clinical abnormality that are encountered on MR imaging of the breast performed to evaluate mammograms with equivocal findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports from MR examinations of 103 patients who underwent MR imaging of the breast to evaluate questionable mammographic findings were retrospectively reviewed. We identified cases that had focal enhancing lesions without a corresponding mammographic or palpable abnormality. Clinical history, mammograms, MR images, and follow-up information were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients, 30 (29%) had incidental foci of enhancement. These women were significantly younger, more often premenopausal, and more likely to have dense breasts than those who did not have incidental foci. Tissue confirmation of the incidental foci was available for seven patients, mammographic follow-up was available for a mean interval of 22 months for 22 patients, and no follow-up was available for one. Cancer at the incidental sites was diagnosed in one of the 30 patients with multiple foci. She was also shown to have cancer at the site originally questioned mammographically (index site). None of the remaining patients has had a diagnosis of malignancy at the incidental sites. CONCLUSION: Incidental enhancing foci are common in women undergoing breast MR imaging for questionable findings on mammography, occurring in 29% of our patients. Our results suggest that unless malignancy is diagnosed elsewhere in the breast, these incidental foci are unlikely to be malignant.     

Unilateral axillary Adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccine

With the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval and rollout of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, it is important for radiologists to consider recent COVID-19 vaccination history as a possible differential diagnosis for patients with unilateral axillary adenopathy. Hyperplastic axillary nodes can be seen on sonography after any vaccination but are more common after a vaccine that evokes a strong immune response, such as the COVID-19 vaccine. As the differential of unilateral axillary adenopathy includes breast malignancy, it is crucial to both thoroughly evaluate the breast for primary malignancy and to elicit history of recent vaccination. As COVID-19 vaccines will soon be available to a larger patient population, radiologists should be familiar with the imaging features of COVID-19 vaccine induced hyperplastic adenopathy and its inclusion in a differential for unilateral axillary adenopathy. Short-term follow-up for unilateral axillary adenopathy in the setting of recent COVID-19 vaccination is an appropriate recommendation, in lieu of immediately performing potentially unnecessary and costly axillary lymph node biopsies.