Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), which is characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction due to occlusion of the major hepatic vein and/or the inferior vena cava (IVC), is rare. Traditionally, a caval resection is advocated for these patients; however, such a manenver renders living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) impossible. We encountered BCS in 4/377 LDLT patients during a 5-year period (January 2003 to December 2007). This report examine the various surgical modifications in these 4 patients, who underwent to LDLT for BCS. Resection of right hepatic vein (RHV) with an adjacent fibrotic part of the IVC with direct anastomosis of the graft RHV to the IVC was performed in 2 patients. One patient underwent retrohepatic IVC excision and reconstruction with a cryopreserved autologous IVC graft. The fourth patient, with a preexisting mesoatrial shunt for BCS, underwent conversion of this to a RHV atrial shunt. Graft and patient survivals were 100%. There were few complications in either donors or recipients. LDLT for BCS can be performed safely with adequate venous drainage techniques and with anticoagulant therapy and good follow-up for early diagnosis and treatment of recurrence leading to excellent long-term results.     

Living donor liver transplantation for Budd–Chiari syndrome with hepatic inferior vena cava obstruction after open pericardial procedures

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) presents a unique challenge as it does not involve replacement of the hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). We report a case of successful LDLT in a patient with BCS associated with occlusion of the hepatic veins as well as the IVC. A 34-year-old woman with a history of two open pericardial procedures had decompensated liver failure and portal hypertension. Venography showed complete obstruction of the hepatic IVC and well-developed collateral vessels. We performed LDLT via sternotomy and laparotomy, with an end-to-end anastomosis between the left hepatic vein of the donor and the patient’s suprahepatic vena cava in the pericardium. The patient recovered uneventfully and has been doing well for 5 years. LDLT without caval replacement for BCS in a patient with hepatic IVC obstruction is feasible if the patient has good functional collaterals before liver transplantation.     

Living donor liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome with inferior vena cava obstruction and associated antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

BACKGROUND: Recently, the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLS) has been recognized as the cause of the Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) in adults. However, APLS-induced BCS has been seen rarely in children. The surgical strategy for BCS depends on the patency of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and on the primary disease. METHODS: A 10-year-old boy with a diagnosis of BCS complicated with IVC obstruction caused by APLS received medical treatment and radiologic intervention for 2 years. In spite of these treatments, no relief of the symptoms could be achieved. Finally, the patient underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which required cavoplasty. He has had an uneventful course since the LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: IVC-obstructed BCS associated with APLS seems to be a good indication for LDLT with cavoplasty. Because liver transplantation (LT) itself is not a cure for APLS, the risk of thrombosis cannot be eliminated entirely by LT. Although immunosuppression may influence antiphospholipid antibody production, long-term observation and life-long anticoagulant treatment is needed even after LT. J Pediatr Surg 36:659-662.     

Living donor liver transplantation with extensive caval thrombectomy for acute-on-chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome

The key consideration when performing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is careful management of a stenotic or occluded inferior vena cava (IVC), because it is not possible to replace the recipient stenotic or occluded IVC with donor IVC as in cadaver donor transplantation. We describe how we performed LDLT with extensive thrombectomy in a patient with acuteon-chronic BCS with a totally thrombosed retrohepatic IVC. The operation was successful and the patient remains well, with follow-up images showing a patent IVC and hepatic veins. To our knowledge, LDLT for a BCS patient with severe extensive caval thrombus has never been reported before. We consider that the successful outcome of this patient clearly demonstrates the feasibility of our technique of extensive thrombectomy, without a vessel graft, to manage a stenotic or occluded IVC in LDLT in patients with BCS.     

New Left Lobe Transplantation Procedure with Caval Reconstruction Using an Inverted Composite Graft for Chronic Budd-Chiari Syndrome in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation—A Case Report

When the Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) lesion extends to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or the orifices of the hepatic vein, the thickened IVC and/or hepatic vein wall must be removed and IVC reconstruction is required in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In various reports about IVC resection in LDLT for BCS, there are none about left lobe liver transplantation with reconstruction of the retrohepatic IVC (rhIVC). To overcome removal and reconstruction of the rhIVC in LDLT for BCS, we introduced a composite IVC graft that is applicable to both right and left lobe partial liver grafts for LDLT for BCS. Pathogenic IVC was removed together with the native liver between the lower edge of the right atrium and 5 cm above the renal vein junction with the use of venovenous bypass. The e-polytetrafluoroethylene graft was anastomosed to the suprarenal intact IVC. Then the native part was detached at the level of just above the renal junction. The composite graft was inverted and a half rim of the native part of the graft was anastomosed to the posterior wall of the right atrium. Next, the common venous orifice of the left lobe graft was anastomosed to the wall defect which was composed of the anterior wall of the right atrium and the distal end of the native part of the composite graft. In conclusion, our inverted composite graft technique will overcome the weak points of LDLT for BCS, such as incomplete removal of the pathogenic caval wall and reconstruction of the rhIVC.     

活体肝移植治疗布加综合征并下腔静脉狭窄

目的 报道笔者利用尸体下腔静脉（IVC）替代受体肝后IVC施行成人间活体肝移植（LDLT）治疗布加综合征（BCS）并IVC狭窄的经验。方法 1例35岁男性BCS并肝后IVC狭窄的患者，曾接受内科治疗，并于9个月前经放射介入置入金属扩张器，但症状无缓解。最终患者被施行了成人间LDLT，术中采用了尸体IVC替代受体肝后IVC进行重建。结果 患者术后过程平稳，效果满意。结论 笔者认为采用LDLT及利用尸肝IVC重建受者肝后IVC治疗BCS并肝后IVC狭窄的术式可推荐作为一种新的术式。     

Budd-Chiari综合征与直视根治术

Budd-Chiari综合征行直视根治术观察其病变并作分析。方法:在常温下血管阻断或置管转流下,经右胸作下腔静脉(IVC)切开行膜切除、血栓摘除、癌栓摘除、自体心包片腔静脉成形、心包管代血管移植等手术共70例。结果:手术死亡3例,术后67例随访5～84个月(平均45个月),B超和IVC造影显示IVC-HV通畅者64例,术后4个月IVC血栓形成1例,术后1～1.5年示IVC狭窄2例。结论:Budd-Chiari综合征用直视根治术是一种较理想的疗法。     

Outflow block secondary to stenosis of the inferior vena cava following living-donor liver transplantation?

Although it is well known that outflow block is caused by stenosis or occlusion of hepatic vein anastomoses following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there have been few reports on inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis following LDLT. In this paper, we report two cases of IVC stenosis and hepatic vein outflow block following right hepatic LDLT in the absence of stenosis of any of the anastomoses. Both patients presented with liver dysfunction, an ascitic fluid volume of approximately 2000 mL, and congestion in their biopsy specimens, and venocavography demonstrated IVC stenosis with gradients of more than 10 mmHg in patients with a dominant inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) anastomosis. After a Gianturco expandable metallic stent successfully implanted in the IVC, the patient's liver function recovered and the volume of ascitic fluid decreased. The pathogenesis of hepatic vein outflow block secondary to IVC stenosis following LDLT may involve the anastomosis with the IRHV, which is the dominant draining vein of the graft and larger than the RHV, caudal to the IVC stenosis and a significant IVC pressure gradient that results in increased IRHV pressure. In conclusion, it is important to include hepatic vein outflow block in the differential diagnosis when patients who have undergone right hepatic LDLT in which anastomosis of the large IRHV has been performed develop manifestations of liver dysfunction.     

Liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a clinical condition characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction secondary to an underlying systemic predisposition to thrombosis. METHODS: We reviewed our experience of 19 adult patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for BCS from April 1988 to May 1999 to assess their long-term outcome and specific complications related to this procedure. RESULTS: Of these patients, 13 presented with chronic and 6 with acute liver failure. At presentation predisposing factors included polycythemia rubra vera in five, an undefined myeloproliferative disorder in four, essential thrombocythemia in two, presence of lupus anticoagulant in one, antiphospholipid antibody positivity in one, post-gestational in one, oral contraceptive pill in one, and idiopathic in four. Five patients had undergone previous porto-systemic shunt. Of the 19 patients, 16 are alive at a median follow-up of 89 months (range 1-119) with 2 patients developing disease recurrence at 4 months and 7 years posttransplant, respectively. Four patients have been retransplanted: one for progressive graft dysfunction due to nodular regenerative hyperplasia secondary to azathioprine toxicity, two for hepatic artery thrombosis (one soon after and the other 47 months posttransplant), and one for recurrent BCS. Three patients have died: one from an intra-abdominal bleed secondary to acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis 8 years posttransplant, another from acute myeloid leukemia at 6 years posttransplant, and the third patient from graft failure secondary to severe rejection 1 month posttransplant. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation for BCS provides good long-term survival with acceptable morbidity. Long-term survival may be prejudiced by progression of the underlying hematological disorders.     

No-Touch En Bloc Right Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation with Inferior Vena Cava Replacement for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Close to Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava: Case Report

Current studies have shown that living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) satisfying the Milan criteria does not compromise patient survival or increase HCC recurrence compared with deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT). For patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria, however, worse outcomes are expected after LDLT than after DDLT, despite insufficient data to reach a conclusion. Regarding operative technique, LDLT might be a less optimal cancer operation for HCC located at the hepatic vein confluence and/or paracaval portion. The closeness to the wall of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) is greater than in conventional DDLT, rendering it difficult to perform a no-touch en bloc total hepatectomy. An LDLT, which must preserve the native IVC for the piggyback technique during engraftment, may lead to tumor remnants. To reduce recurrences after LDLT, we successfully performed a no-touch en bloc total hepatectomy including the retrohepatic IVC and all 3 hepatic veins. IVC replacement with an artificial vascular graft together with a modified right-lobe LDLT was performed for a patient having advanced HCC close to the hepatic vein confluence and paracaval portion. There was no artificial vascular graft-related complication, such as thrombosis or infection. Despite the limitations of LDLT, requiring the piggyback technique for graft implantation, IVC replacement using an artificial graft led us to perform a no-touch en bloc total hepatectomy as with a conventional DDLT.     

A 27-year experience with surgical treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of surgical portal decompression in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) on survival, quality of life, shunt patency, liver function, portal hemodynamics, and hepatic morphology during periods ranging from 3.5 to 27 years. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Experiments in the authors' laboratory showed that surgical portal decompression reversed the deleterious effects of BCS on the liver. This study was aimed at determining whether similar benefit could be obtained in patients with BCS. METHODS: From 1972 to 1999, the authors conducted prospective studies of the treatment of 60 patients with BCS who were divided into three groups: the first had occlusion confined to the hepatic veins treated by direct side-to-side portacaval shunt (SSPCS); the second had occlusion involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) treated by a portal decompressive procedure that bypassed the obstructed IVC; and the third group, who had advanced cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation and were referred too late for treatment by portal decompression, required orthotopic liver transplantation. RESULTS: In the 32 patients with BCS resulting from hepatic vein occlusion alone, SSPCS had a surgical death rate of 3%, and 94% of the patients were alive 3.5 to 27 years after surgery. All 31 survivors remained free of ascites and almost all had normal liver function. No patient with a patent shunt had encephalopathy. The SSPCS remained patent in all but one patient. Liver biopsies showed no evidence of congestion or necrosis, and 48% of the biopsies were diagnosed as normal. Mesoatrial shunt was performed in eight patients with BCS caused by IVC thrombosis. All patients survived surgery, but five subsequently developed thrombosis of the synthetic graft and died. Because of the poor results, mesoatrial shunt was abandoned. Instead, a high-flow combination shunt was introduced, consisting of SSPCS combined with a cavoatrial shunt (CAS) through a Gore-Tex graft. There were no surgical or long-term deaths among 10 patients who underwent combined SSPCS and CAS, and the shunts functioned effectively during 4 to 16 years of follow-up. Ten patients with advanced cirrhosis were referred too late to benefit from surgical portal decompression, and they were approved and listed for orthotopic liver transplantation. Three patients died of liver failure while awaiting a transplant, and four patients died after the transplant. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 40% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SSPCS in BCS with hepatic vein occlusion alone results in reversal of liver damage, correction of hemodynamic disturbances, prolonged survival, and good quality of life when performed early in the course of BCS. Similarly good results are obtained with combined SSPCS and CAS in patients with BCS resulting from IVC occlusion. In contrast, mesoatrial shunt has been discontinued in the authors' program because of an unacceptable incidence of graft thrombosis and death. In patients with advanced cirrhosis from long-standing, untreated BCS, orthotopic liver transplantation is the only hope of relief and results in the salvage of some patients. The key to long survival in BCS is prompt diagnosis and treatment by portal decompression.     

Novel rescue procedure for inferior vena cava reconstruction in living‐donor liver transplantation using a vascular graft recovered 25 h after donors' circulatory death and systematic review

Liver transplantation is a lifesaving treatment for patients suffering from end‐stage liver disease. Rarely, acute congestion of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is being encountered because of tumor compression. MELD allocation does not reflect severity of this condition because of lack of organ failure. Herein, a patient is being presented undergoing urgent living‐donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with IVC reconstruction for a fast‐growing hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH). IVC reconstruction using a venous graft recovered from a 25‐h after circulatory‐death prior transplantation became necessary to compensate severe venous congestion. Additionally, a systematic review of the literature searching MEDLINE/PubMed was performed. Protocol and eligibility criteria were specified in advance and registered at the PROSPERO registry (CRD42013004827). Published literature of IVC reconstruction in LDLT was selected. Two reports describing IVC reconstruction with cryopreserved IVC grafts and one IVC reconstruction using a deceased after‐circulatory‐death‐donor IVC graft were included. Follow‐up was at 12 and 13 months, respectively. Regarding the graft recovery in the setting of living‐related donation, this graft remained patent during the nine‐month follow‐up period. This is the first report on the use of a venous graft from a circulatory‐death‐donor, not eligible for whole organ recovery. We demonstrate in this study the feasibility of using a size and blood‐group‐compatible IVC graft from a cold‐stored donor, which can solve the problem of urgent IVC reconstruction in patients undergoing LDLT.     

Utilization of autologous vein graft for replacement of the inferior vena cava in living-donor liver transplantation for obliterative hepatocavopathy

Obliterative hepatocavopathy (OHC) is a subtype of Budd-Chiari syndrome in which stenosis or obstruction of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) is observed. Although IVC replacement is necessary in OHC patients, there are hardly any graft vessels available for IVC reconstruction during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Here, we describe a novel technique of IVC reconstruction using only the autologous blood vessels in an OHC patient during LDLT. In this case, sufficient drainage of the hepatic outflow and reconstruction of the venous return from the lower half of the body were simultaneously required. Therefore, we substituted the retrohepatic IVC with the suprarenal IVC of the recipient, and we reconstructed the IVC continuity by using the autologous internal jugular vein and external iliac vein. The operation was safe, and the postoperative venous drainage from the hepatic tributaries was in good condition. This procedure might be an option for IVC replacement during LDLT.     

Simultaneous hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis after living donor liver transplantation

Simultaneous hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis rarely occurs after liver transplantation. The etiology is unknown. Of 213 patients (72 children and 141 adults) that underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from January 1996 to March 2003, 4 (2%) developed simultaneous thrombosis at 3 hours to 7 days (median, 4 days) after the operation. Emergent thrombectomy was performed in three patients; the remaining patient was registered in the Japan organ transplant network. All of the patients died due to hepatic failure (range, 18 hours to 6 days after the diagnosis; median, 2 days). Portal vein, hepatic artery, and hepatic vein velocity in the liver graft were measured every 12 hours by Doppler ultrasonography for 2 weeks after liver transplantation. These parameters were stable until just before the simultaneous thrombosis. These findings indicate that protocol Doppler ultrasonography can diagnose, but not predict, this fatal complication.     

Standard hepatic vein reconstruction with patch plasty using the native portal vein in adult living donor liver transplantation

An outflow obstruction of the hepatic vein is a critical complication after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and occasionally leads to hepatic failure. Here we introduce a simple method for preventing outflow obstructions by patch plasty in adult LDLT. Between September 2001 and May 2010, 468 adult LDLT procedures were performed at Kyoto University Hospital. We harvested each recipient's portal vein (PV) from the extirpated liver for a patch. We intended to re-form several orifices of the hepatic veins into a single, large orifice. The patch was attached to the anterior wall of the re-formed orifice on the bench. After we put in the liver graft, the procedure for the hepatic vein anastomosis to the inferior vena cava was simple enough that the warm ischemia time was reduced. Three of the 468 cases were diagnosed with an outflow obstruction. All 3 cases underwent hepatic vein reconstruction without patch plasty. In contrast, none of the 159 cases that underwent LDLT with patch plasty suffered from an outflow obstruction, regardless of the liver graft type. The procedure for hepatic vein plasty using a patch from the native PV is simple and elegant and results in excellent outcomes. We propose this as the standard procedure for hepatic vein reconstruction in adult LDLT.     

改进成人间活体供肝移植的手术技术

目的研究并改进成人间活体供肝移植的手术技术。方法自2002年1月至2005年8月,施行了16例成人间活体右半供肝移植。手术中改进了技术,包括右肝静脉重建、肝中静脉分支搭桥、肝动脉搭桥及胆道吻合等。结果所有供者均无严重并发症及死亡。移植肝与受者重量比（GRWR）为0．72％～1．24％,其中9例〈1．0％,2例〈0．8％。手术除了采用移植肝的右肝静脉与受者下腔静脉（IVC）直接吻合外,5例加行右肝下静脉重建、5例取自体大隐静脉行肝中静脉分支与IVC间搭桥,保证了右肝流出道通畅。最早手术的2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,另1例发生小肝综合征,最终导致死亡。后阶段手术的14例受者均未发生小肝综合征;发生并发症5例,分别为急性排斥反应、肝动脉栓塞、胆漏、左膈下脓肿及肺部感染;1例再次肝移植后因肺部感染,多器官功能衰竭（MOF）死亡。结论活体供肝移植中采用改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道重建的方法,可有效避免发生小肝综合征。     

成人间活体肝移植的手术技术改进(附13例报告)

目的探讨成人间活体肝移植的手术技术改进.方法2005年3-6月,施行了13例成人间右半肝活体肝移植,其中1例接受了2个左半肝,另1例接受了1个活体右半肝,1个尸体左半肝,术中采用了改良的手术技术,包括右肝静脉的重建,肝中静脉分支的搭桥,肝动脉搭桥及胆道吻合的改进.结果全组供体无严重并发症及死亡,受体发生并发症4例,包括肝动脉栓塞,胆漏,右膈下脓肿及肺部感染各1例,1例再移植因术后肺部感染,导致多器官衰竭（MOF）死亡.13例中除右肝静脉与下腔静脉（IVC）直接吻合,5例加行右肝下静脉重建,另5例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥行肝中静脉分支与IVC重建,保证了右肝的流出道通畅.移植物与受体重量比（GRWR）为0.72%至1.24%,其中9例＜1.0%,2例＜0.8%,无小肝综合征发生.结论采用了改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道的充分重建可有效避免小肝综合征,从而使活体右半肝移植成为相当安全的手术.     

Living-related liver transplantation and vena cava reconstruction after total hepatectomy including the vena cava for hepatoblastoma.

BACKGROUND: In most cases of total hepatectomy (TH) required for hepatoblastoma (HB), the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) has to be removed with the native liver for complete tumor excision. Because the liver graft procured by living donation has no IVC, a reconstruction of the recipient IVC is needed. We report our experience with living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) and IVC replacement in such cases. METHODS: Between May 1998 and December 1999, four children underwent TH, including IVC and LRLT with IVC replacement for otherwise irresectable HB after chemotherapy (SIOPEL 2 and 3 protocols). IVC reconstruction used an allogenic iliac vein procured from a cadaveric donor (bank graft) in two cases and an internal jugular vein procured from the donor parent in two cases. Median age and weight at surgery were 17 months (range 10-60) and 9.6 kg (range 8.3-17.9). RESULTS: In the living donors, there were two complications of the procurement: one intra-abdominal biliary collection and one subcutaneous abscess. In all four children, complete excision of the tumor could be achieved without any intra-operative complication. One patient died 5 months after LRLT due to lung metastases. Three patients were alive and well with no evidence of tumor recurrence 13-24 months after surgery. Reconstructed IVC was patent in two patients, and asymptomatic thrombosis occurred 2 years after operation in one patient. CONCLUSION: Total hepatectomy including the retrohepatic IVC is not a technical obstacle to LRLT. Therefore, scheduled surgery, at the best time after chemotherapy, can be considered in all patients with otherwise irresectable HBs.     

Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome: outcome of endovascular management for suprahepatic venous obstruction

OBJECTIVE: Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare form of hepatic venous outflow obstruction at the suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC), the hepatic veins, or both. We assessed our 4-year experience in the management of BCS to evaluate the results of our methods of care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a nonrandomized clinical trial conducted in three teaching hospitals. Among 28 primary BCS patients, 9 remained in medical treatment only, and 19 who failed to respond to medical treatment received additional endovascular (n = 17) or surgical therapy (n = 2). Nine underwent IVC balloon angioplasty alone, 6 had angioplasty plus stents, and 2 had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) for hepatic vein lesions. One patient had a mesoatrial bypass; another had liver transplantation. Immediate response to the therapy was assessed with angiography and ultrasonography based on anatomic and/or hemodynamic correction or reduction of the lesion. Subsequent assessment of portal hypertension status was made with periodic clinical and laboratory evaluation (eg, ultrasonography, liver biopsy). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had had IVC stenosis or occlusion by focal or segmental lesion. Two patients had hepatic vein outlet obstruction. There was no evidence of coagulopathy as the pathogenesis; all were related to membranous obstruction of the vena cava. Excellent immediate response to the endovascular therapy and subsequent relief of portal hypertension were achieved in 14 patients. Four patients had restenosis or progression of the residual lesion within 2 years; three responded to repeated stenting. Primary patency was 76.5%, and primary assisted patency was 94.1%. Two patients with TIPS and two with surgical therapy maintained excellent results. The medical treatment remained effective only in a limited group of 6 (21.4%) of the 28 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In BCS, both endovascular and surgical interventions provide excellent results and potentially halt liver parenchymal deterioration caused by portal hypertension. Liver transplantation remains the ultimate solution for advanced liver failure.     

Impact of graft hepatic vein inferior vena cava reconstruction with graft venoplasty and inferior vena cava cavoplasty in living donor adult liver transplantation using a left lobe graft

BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous reconstruction is critical in living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) because outflow obstruction in small for size graft may lead to graft dysfunction or loss. We describe the usefulness of venoplasties of the graft hepatic vein (HV) and graft HV-recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction in LDALT using a left lobe graft. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent LDALT were studied. We divided the patients into following two groups: venoplasty group (n=30) and control group (n=30). For the patients with venoplasty group, venoplasty of the graft and recipient IVC cavoplasty was made to widen the orifice. Comparison examination of a background factors and postoperative bilirubin and the ascites was carried out. RESULTS: The mean graft volume standard liver volume ratio (GV/SLV) did not have the difference at 41.7% of venoplasty group, and 42.1% of control group (p=NS). The diameter of the hepatic vein in control and venoplasty group before and after venoplasty is 26.9+/-5.5, 28.2+/-2.9, and 34.1+/-3.9 mm, respectively. The diameter of the hepatic vein after venoplasty is larger than that of before venoplasty and of control (P<0.05). Mean total bilirubin level on postoperative day (POD) 7 is 13.8+/-9.3 mg/dl in control group and 7.0+/-3.3 mg/dl in venoplasty group (P<0.05). Mean amount of ascites on POD 7 and 14 are 1576+/-1113 and 1397+/-1661 cc in control group, and 736+/-416 and 550+/-385 cc in venoplasty group, respectively (P<0.05). Two-year survival rate is 75.2 % in control group and 86.6 % in venoplasty group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in LDALT using left lobe graft, HV-IVC reconstruction with graft venoplasty and IVC cavoplasty is useful not only to prevent outflow block but also to improve graft function.