Effective use of combination lipid therapy

Despite the benefits of statin therapy, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol management remains suboptimal and many patients do not achieve their recommended target goals. The aim of combination lipid drug therapy in high-risk patients is to achieve LDL cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol goals with a minimum of serious adverse effects. Although statins are the drug of first choice, statin monotherapy may be limited by intolerance of dose escalation or failure to attain non-HDL cholesterol goals in those with mixed hyperlipidemia. Statins plus bile acid resins or ezetimibe can achieve greater than 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol, with little or no increase in adverse effects. Fibrates, niacin, and omega-3 fatty acids, when added to statins, can reduce triglycerides, increase HDL cholesterol, and reduce non-HDL cholesterol to a greater extent than statin monotherapy. The safety profile of combination lipid therapy is acceptable if the global coronary heart disease risk of the patient is high, thus producing a favorable risk to benefit ratio. Careful surveillance of hepatic transaminases, avoidance of gemfibrozil in statin-fibrate combinations, and awareness of statin-concomitant drug interactions is key to safe and efficacious use of combination lipid drug therapy.     

Comparative effects on lipid levels of combination therapy with a statin and extended-release niacin or ezetimibe versus a statin alone (the COMPELL study)

International guidelines recommend lower target cholesterol levels and treatment of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated triglycerides for patients at moderately high to high coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Combination therapy is often required to achieve multiple lipid treatment goals, and > or =50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is needed in some patients to achieve aggressive LDL-C targets. In this context, we evaluated comparative effects on lipid levels of combination therapy at low to moderate doses with a statin plus extended-release niacin (niacin ER), a statin plus ezetimibe, and a highly potent statin alone. This was an open-label, multicenter, 12-week study in 292 patients (50% women) who qualified for drug therapy based on number of CHD risk factors. Patients were randomized to four parallel arms, titrated from low to moderate or high doses: atorvastatin/niacin ER, rosuvastatin/niacin ER, simvastatin/ezetimibe, or rosuvastatin alone. Baseline mean values were, for LDL-C 197 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L), HDL-C 49 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L), triglycerides 168 mg/dL (1.9 mmol/L). There were no significant differences among treatment groups in the change from baseline in LDL-C at pre-specified timepoints during treatment. All groups lowered LDL-C by approximately 50% or more (range -49 to -57%), achieving mean levels of 82-98 mg/dL (2.1-2.5 mmol/L). Changes in non-HDL-C (range -46 to -55%) mirrored those for LDL-C and did not differ among treatment groups. Statin/niacin ER combination regimens also increased HDL-C and large HDL (HDL2) and lowered triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) significantly more than other regimens. No drug-related myopathy or hepatotoxicity was observed. In this study, low to moderate dose combination therapy with a statin and niacin ER provided broad control of lipids and lipoproteins independently associated with CHD.     

The role of ezetimibe in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: Where do we stand after ARBITER 6-HALTS

Ezetimibe, a selective inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption, rapidly became one of the most widely drugs in the US following its approval by the FDA in 2002. Due to its capacity to significantly lower LDL-C with few side effects, ezetimibe has been very useful in enabling patients who were statin intolerant to reach their recommended therapeutic goal for LDL-C. In addition, ezetimibe also reduces non-HDL-C and raises HDL-C, further enhancing its effectiveness in clinical practice. A significant preponderance of evidence supports the reduction of LDL-C and non-HDL-C as the most effective therapy to prevent or reverse atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However 3 recent clinical trials, ENHANCE, SEAS, and ARBITER 6-HALTS have raised questions about the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and have led to a re-examination of its clinical use as a drug for managing lipid risk factors to prevent or manage ASCVD. An in-depth analysis of these three trials reveals methodological deficiencies and concerns with the statistical methods used which significantly diminish their indictment of the clinical utility of ezetimibe. In contrast, The SANDS trial has confirmed the effectiveness of ezetimibe in managing both LDL-C and non-HDL-C, and also demonstrated this drug’s ability to improve carotid atherosclerosis by producing regression of CIMT. One of the important conclusions of the SANDS Trail is that ezetimibe remains an effective adjunctive medication for use in patients who do not reach their LDL-C goals on statin monotherapy. However, as a significant residual risk for ASCVD remains even after aggressive goals for LDL-C and non-HDL-C are reached, current treatment strategies should emphasize managing of all cardiac risk factors and increasing HDL in addition to the attainment and maintenance of recommended goals for LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Hence, ezetimibe should be considered as an important component of broad-spectrum management of lipid risk factors with therapy that includes statins, niacin, bile acid sequestrants, fibrates and Omega 3 fatty acids in appropriate combinations in addition to therapeutic life change.     

Comparison of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin in achieving cholesterol goals and improving plasma lipids in hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without the metabolic syndrome in the MERCURY I trial

AIM: The metabolic syndrome (MS) increases the risk of coronary heart disease, yet few data are available on the effects of statin treatment in improving lipid measures in patients with the syndrome. This analysis compares the effects of statin therapy on plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement and lipid levels in hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without the MS. METHODS: The Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin TherapY I (MERCURY I) trial compared rosuvastatin 10 mg with atorvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg and pravastatin 40 mg over 8 weeks in patients with coronary or other atherosclerotic diseases or diabetes who had fasting levels of LDL-C of >or=2.99 mmol/l and triglycerides of <4.52 mmol/l. Modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) criteria for the MS were met by 1342 (43%) of 3140 patients. RESULTS: LDL-C goal achievement rates and reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were similar in patients with and without the MS within statin treatment groups; triglycerides were reduced more and HDL-C tended to be increased more in patients with the MS, as expected. Treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective in allowing patients with and without the MS to reach European and ATP III LDL-C goals, compared to atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg and pravastatin 40 mg (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons); consistently produced greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol and non-HDL-C, compared to these treatments; and produced similar or greater reductions in triglycerides and increases in HDL-C, compared to the other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy is effective in allowing LDL-C goal achievement and improving the lipid profile in hypercholesterolaemic high-risk patients with the MS. Rosuvastatin 10 mg presents significant advantages in goal achievement and lipid lowering over other statins at commonly used doses in patients both with and without the MS.     

The benefit of fibrates in the treatment of 'bad HDL-C responders to statins'

BACKGROUND: Lowering high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary aim in the prevention of cardiac events. However, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are also associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. Some patients have lower HDL-C during statin treatment than before the treatment. These patients were first described in 2002 as 'bad HDL-C responders to statins'. The aim of this study was to describe the benefit of fibrates in monotherapy for these patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of lipid levels, cardiovascular disease and risk factors in outpatients treated for dyslipidemia. For this study we analyzed the lipid levels, drug treatment and medical history for 14 patients with low HDL-C (<40 mg/dl) during statin treatment and ever treated with fibrates. RESULTS: Total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C were respectively 8% and 6% higher with fibrates compared to statins. Mean HDL-C was 49% higher during fibrate treatment and TC to HDL-C and LDL-C to HDL-C were respectively 26% and 27% lower with fibrates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low levels of HDL-C during statin treatment had far better levels for HDL-C, TC to HDL-C and LDL-C to HDL-C with fibrates in monotherapy. For bad HDL-C responders to statins with low or normal LDL-C treatment with fibrates instead of statins should be considered. For those with high LDL-C fibrates should be added to statins. A randomized double-blind crossover trial with simvastatin and fenofibrate has been initiated to corroborate these findings.     

Managing diabetic dyslipidemia: Beyond statin therapy

Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus. The lipid profile of type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by increased triglycerides (TGs), decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), increased very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs), and small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles, the combination of which is highly atherogenic. In diabetic patients, current treatment guidelines target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤ 100 mg/dL with statins. In patients with elevated TGs, non-HDL-C is considered a secondary target of therapy. Despite the use of statin therapy in diabetes, a significant number of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD) events still occur, indicating the need to target other modifiable risk factors for CHD, including high TGs and low HDL-C.     

Hochdosierte Statintherapie für kardiovaskuläre Risikopatienten

Lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins decreases cardiovascular risk; therefore LDL-C is the primary target in lipid therapy. The amount of risk reduction is the greater, the lower the LDL-C values achieved by statin therapy are. Current guidelines therefore require an LDL-C as low as < 70 mg/dl in patients who are at a very high risk of cardiovascular events. This stringent treatment goal depending on the baseline LDL-C values typically can only be obtained with higher doses of potent statins. Randomised trials demonstrate the efficacy of high-dose therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day with regard to the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients after acute coronary syndromes (PROVE-IT TIMI 22 trial), in patients with stable coronary artery disease (TNT trial), and in patients after stroke or TIA (SPARCL trial). Moreover, potent statin treatment reduces the progression of coronary atherosclerosis (REVERSAL and ASTEROID trials). Furthermore, large meta-analyses of the efficacy of high-dose statin therapy confirm its safety; in particular, muscle-related adverse events are not more frequent than with standard statin doses. It is recommended that evidence-based statin doses be used in clinical practice; the dosages used in clinical trials should be given rather than titrating patients to LDL-C targets by increasing statin doses in a stepwise manner. Whether the strong LDL-C lowering combination of simvastatin plus ezetimibe will reduce cardiovascular events over and above simvastatin monotherapy is currently being tested in the ongoing IMPROVE-IT trial. Importantly, despite the large body of evidence in favour of high-dose statin therapy for patients at high cardiovascular risk, high-dose statin therapy is still underused and LDL-C goals are still not met in the majority of these patients.     

Residual risk in statin-treated patients: Future therapeutic options

Statin therapy for aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, even on maximal statin therapy, high-risk patients have substantial residual risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Certain subgroups, such as individuals with diabetes mellitus, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), metabolic syndrome, or other comorbidities, have a particularly high residual risk. Patients at high risk for future CHD events often require multiple aggressive risk-reduction therapies (eg, antiplatelet agents, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blockade, cholesterol and/or diabetes management, and lifestyle interventions) to further lower their overall cardiovascular risk. For cholesterol management, combination therapy may be required to attain optimal levels of LDL-C, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C.     

Managing the residual cardiovascular disease risk associated with HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in statin-treated patients: A clinical update

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant cause of death in Europe. In addition to patients with proven CVD, those with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at a particularly high-risk of CVD and associated mortality. Treatment for dyslipidaemia, a principal risk factor for CVD, remains a healthcare priority; evidence supports the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as the primary objective of dyslipidaemia management.While statins are the treatment of choice for lowering LDL-C in the majority of patients, including those with T2D, many patients retain a high CVD risk despite achieving the recommended LDL-C targets with statins. This ‘residual risk’ is mainly due to elevated triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. Following statin therapy optimisation additional pharmacotherapy should be considered as part of a multifaceted approach to risk reduction. Fibrates (especially fenofibrate) are the principal agents recommended for add-on therapy to treat elevated TG or low HDL-C levels. Currently, the strongest evidence of benefit is for the addition of fenofibrate to statin treatment in high-risk patients with T2D and dyslipidaemia. An alternative approach is the addition of agents to reduce LDL-C beyond the levels attainable with statin monotherapy.Here, addition of fibrates and niacin to statin therapy is discussed, and novel approaches being developed for HDL-C and TG management, including cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, Apo A-1 analogues, mipomersen, lomitapide and monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9, are reviewed.     

Low HDL-C: a secondary target of dyslipidemia therapy

Current guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) focus on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as the primary target of lipid-modifying therapy. However, there is increasing interest in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as a secondary target of therapy. A wealth of epidemiologic data demonstrate that low levels of HDL-C are associated with an increased risk of CHD events, and data from large-scale clinical trials with statins and fibrates indicate that observed clinical benefits are related, at least in part, to improvements in HDL-C levels. Raising HDL-C levels with therapeutic lifestyle changes and pharmacologic intervention might afford opportunities to further reduce the risk of CHD beyond LDL-C lowering. Statins are first-line pharmacotherapy for dyslipidemia and can also improve HDL-C levels, although the extent to which they modify HDL-C varies. Combining a fibrate or niacin with statin therapy raises HDL-C more than a statin alone but might be associated with reduced tolerability and increased adverse reactions. Several new therapeutic approaches to raising HDL-C are in development, including an HDL mimetic and inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Although lowering LDL-C remains the primary target of lipid-modifying therapy, dyslipidemia therapies that are efficacious for both LDL-C reduction and raising HDL-C might offer further improvements in CHD risk reduction.     

Optimal treatment of dyslipidemia in high-risk patients: intensive statin treatment or combination therapy?

A recent update to the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines suggests low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals of <70 mg/dL in very-high-risk patients and <100 mg/dL in high-risk patients. Currently available 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are not equal in their ability to lower LDL-C, and it is unlikely that the substantial LDL-C reductions that are often needed in high-risk persons can be achieved with starting doses of some of the older statins. Possible alternatives in such cases include the use of high-dose statin therapy, a more efficacious statin, or combination therapy. Recent clinical data have demonstrated a greater likelihood of coronary heart disease event reduction with aggressive statin therapy that lowers LDL-C in a robust fashion (>30%-40%) than with moderate therapy. Until data from ongoing trials of combination therapy are available, however, monotherapy with a potent statin should be initiated to lower LDL-C. Nonetheless, for residual elevation in triglycerides and/or reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, adding a second agent (eg, fenofibrate, niacin) is a reasonable option.     

Relative atherogenicity and predictive value of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for coronary heart disease

Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-established atherogenic factor for coronary heart disease, it does not completely represent the risk associated with atherogenic lipoproteins in the presence of high triglyceride (TG) levels. Constituent lipoproteins constituting non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) include atherogenic TG-rich lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester-enriched remnants of TG-rich lipoproteins, and lipoprotein(a). Recent observational and intervention studies suggest that the predictive value of non-HDL-C for cardiovascular risk and mortality is better than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and that non-HDL-C correlates highly with plasma apolipoprotein B levels. Currently, the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines identify non-HDL-C as a secondary target of therapy in patients with TG elevation (> or =200 mg/dl) after the attainment of LDL-C target goals. In patients with coronary heart disease or coronary heart disease risk equivalents, an optional non-HDL-C goal is <100 mg/dl. To achieve the non-HDL-C goal, statin therapy may be intensified or combined with ezetimibe, niacin, a fibrate, or omega-3 fatty acids. In conclusion, non-HDL-C remains an important target of therapy for patients with elevated TGs, although its widespread adoption has yet to gain a foothold among health care professionals treating patients with dyslipidemia.     

Cholesterol absorption inhibitors: defining new options in lipid management

Although many studies have documented that reduction of plasma cholesterol levels decreases the risk of coronary artery disease, it remains the most common cause of death in the Western world. Current therapeutic options are effective in lowering cholesterol, especially in clinical trials, but clinical application is not optimized for many reasons. Dietary restriction for long-term management of hypercholesterolemia is helpful but usually insufficient to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to goal levels. Powerful drugs are available, but these are often insufficient to meet the clinical demands for cholesterol-lowering therapy. Phytosterols and phytostanols have been partially effective by providing some inhibition of absorption of cholesterol. Compounds that specifically and more effectively block intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol should provide a significant new agent for altering lipoprotein concentrations favorably. Ezetimibe is the first of this class of compounds that act at the gut epithelium to reduce cholesterol absorption in the milligram dose range markedly. Clinical studies indicate that ezetimibe effectively decreases LDL-C by 15 to 20% as monotherapy, with a favorable safety profile. Moreover, results from preliminary clinical trials indicate that ezetimibe given concomitantly with a statin provides additive efficacy. The combination represents a new approach to lipid management, achieving greater LDL-C and triglyceride reductions and greater improvements in HDL-C than statin monotherapy. This could offer another important option in clinical practice for management of hypercholesterolemic patients.     

Ezetimibe: A First‐in‐Class,Novel Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor

Significant numbers of patients at risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) fail to reach National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)‐designated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) goals in spite of the wide range of currently available treatments, including combination therapies. Ezetimibe, the first in a class of novel cholesterol absorption inhibitors, demonstrated lipid‐lowering and antiatherosclerotic activity in experimental and clinical hypercholesterolemia. Studies in hypercholesterolemic dogs showed that ezetimibe coadministered with statins caused greater lipid‐lowering effects compared to either drug alone. These effects were confirmed in clinical studies of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia where initiation of treatment with ezetimibe plus a statin, or addition of ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy, produced significant incremental reductions in LDL‐C, as well as incremental increases in high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) and reductions in triglyceride levels. Combination therapy also significantly increased the number of patients attaining LDL‐C goal at the end of treatment, compared to statin monotherapy. In studies using simvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin, addition of ezetimibe to low dose statin was as effective as a 2‐ to 3‐fold upward titration of the corresponding statin dose. Ezetimibe‐statin combination therapy provided similar improvements in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, as well as with heterozygous and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Ezetimibe monotherapy effectively reduced plasma campesterol and sitosterol in patients with homozygous sitosterolemia. Clinical studies showed that ezetimibe was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to placebo when administered as monotherapy and comparable to statin alone when coadministered with a statin. These data provide strong evidence that, through their complementary lipid‐lowering mechanisms, ezetimibe coadministered with a statin offers an effective combination treatment option for patients with hypercholesterolemia, including those with genetically inherited disease.     

Do people with diabetes need statins?

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to increase rapidly. Persons with diabetes face a 2-fold greater absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than those without diabetes. Many diabetic patients die before reaching the hospital after a cardiovascular event. Use of statin therapy for intensive control of diabetic dyslipidemia has produced relative reductions in CVD risk of about 25% in randomized, controlled clinical trials. This is true even though low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the primary target of statin therapy, might not be markedly elevated in diabetic patients. Most patients with diabetes or diabetes plus established CVD warrant intensive statin therapy. Statin therapy has the ability to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals recommended in treatment guidelines. Alone or in combination with an additional lipid-lowering drug, statins may also improve triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol abnormalities in patients with diabetes.     

Management of dyslipidemia in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cardiovascular disease is a major complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and this is partly due to associated abnormalities of plasma lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Although glycemic control improves plasma lipoprotein abnormalities and may have an independent benefit on cardiovascular risk reduction, the magnitude of this benefit is less than cholesterol lowering therapy. Current treatment guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in people with type 2 diabetes are based on the results of cardiovascular outcome clinical trials. Primary emphasis of treatment should be on lowering LDL-C to < 100 mg/dl with statins. If cardiovascular disease is present, then high dose statins should be used, and an optional LDL-C goal < 70 is recommended. If triglycerides are > 200 mg/dl, then a secondary goal is to lower non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dl (< 100 mg/dl if cardiovascular disease is present) is recommended. Low HDL-C levels are common in type 2 diabetes but are not currently recommended as a target for treatment because of the lack of definitive cardiovascular outcome studies supporting this goal, and because of the difficulty in raising HDL-C. The additional benefit of combination therapy with fibrates, ezetimibe or niacin added to a statin on cardiovascular risk is uncertain pending the results of on-going cardiovascular outcome studies.     

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: why lower is better

Recent comparative trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) suggest that lower is better and that reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to below 100 mg/dL can provide additional clinical benefit. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) contains more atherogenic cholesterol than LDL-C and is considered a more accurate measurement of the total amount of atherogenic particles in the circulation. Therefore, the principle that "lower is better" may also apply to lowering levels of non-HDL-C. In persons with high triglycerides (200-499 mg/dL), LDL-C remains the primary target of therapy, but non-HDL-C is an important secondary therapeutic target. Non-HDL-C is strongly correlated with small dense LDL as well as apolipoprotein B, an established predictor of cardiovascular disease risk. Current evidence indicates that statins not only rapidly and dramatically reduce LDL-C, but also have a similar effect on non-HDL-C, and that the greater the reduction in LDL-C, the greater will be the reduction in non-HDL-C.     

Achieving optimum lipid-lowering goals in patients with vascular disease

Individuals with established cardiovascular disease are at high risk for serious adverse ischemic events. Fortunately, effective control of serum cholesterol levels, especially low-density lipoprotein (LDL), can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. To achieve these benefits, the evidence-based National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines recommend an LDL goal of less than 100 mg/dL with a secondary non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) goal of less than 130 mg/dL. The more aggressive optional goals are an LDL less than 70 mg/dL and a non-HDL of less than 100 mg/dL. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) exert potent LDL-lowering as well as pleiotropic effects, and these agents have consistently reduced cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction in trials of secondary prevention. Should a statin drug alone fail to achieve the goal due to resistance or patient intolerance, combination drug therapy can be used. Combination therapy may also help achieve secondary goals for the reduction of non-HDL cholesterol levels.     

Serum lipid comparison in patients treated by statins or fibrates: existence of bad HDL-C responders to statins

INTRODUCTION: Major cardiac events are strongly associated with high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The HDL-C target level (40 mg/dl) is often not achieved with statins. The aim of this study was to compare the proportions of patients achieving the HDL-C target levels after one year of treatment with statins or fibrates. Furthermore, a subgroup with low HDL-C levels during statin treatment was investigated and suggestions are made for a better management of these patients. METHODS: A survey of lipid levels, cardiovascular disease and risk factors in 120 outpatients treated with a statin or a fibrate for hyperlipidaemia (total cholesterol (TC) > 250 mg/dl or triglycerides (TG) > 200 mg/dl after diet). After one year of treatment the proportions of patients achieving the target levels for TC, LDL-C, HDL-C,TG,TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C are compared for statins and fibrates. RESULTS: The proportions of patients achieving the target lipid levels with statins or fibrates are comparable except for HDL-C. Compared to the baseline, the proportion of patients achieving the HDL-C target level of 40 mg/dl increases only by 8.3% for statins and by 42.9% for fibrates. In total, 38.5% of the statin group had low HDL-C-levels after one year of treatment. Among these patients, eight were treated with a fibrate before the statin and six were treated with a fibrate afterwards. In those 14 patients, mean HDL-C increased during fibrate treatment by 48.5% and TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C decreased by 25.7 and 26.5%, respectively as compared with statins. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low levels of HDL-C during statin treatment had far better levels of HDL-C, TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C with fibrates. A randomised double-blind crossover trial with simvastatin and fenofibrate has been initiated to corroborate these findings.     

Pharmacotherapy of Dyslipidemia

Reducing elevated levels of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly reduces the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) events and mortality in hypercholesterolemic patients. CHD risk reduction is proportional to LDL-C reduction. Despite this knowledge, many physicians are not applying existing treatment guidelines to the extent required to achieve target LDL-C levels. Target LDL-C levels are not achievable for most patients without drug therapy. Based on their lipid-lowering abilities, safety, and tolerability profiles, the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are the first-line pharmacotherapeutic agents for hypercholesterolemia. The ability of statins to reduce CHD events and total mortality in primary- and secondary-prevention patients also supports this assertion. For combined dyslipidemia, statin monotherapy is a reasonable initial approach in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia because statins effectively lower both LDL-C and triglycerides. Fibrates or niacin are effective therapies for severe hypertriglyceridemia. Resins are moderately effective in isolated hypercholesterolemia, and are a useful alternative to statins in pregnant women or patients with liver disease. For severe hyperlipidemia that does not respond to single drug therapy, combination drug therapy may be required. This article reviews the various manifestations of dyslipidemia and assesses the most efficacious treatments.