Phase II study of preoperative sequential FEC and docetaxel predicts of pathological response and disease free survival

Purpose This multicenter phase II study examined the impact of pathological effect on survival after preoperative chemotherapy in Japanese women with early stage breast cancer. Patients and methods Prior to surgery, patients received four cycles of FEC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) q3w) followed by four cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) q3w). Primary endpoint was 3 year disease free survival (DFS) stratified by the absence or presence of Quasi-pCR (QpCR; absence of invasive tumor or only focal residual tumor cells). Secondary endpoints were predictors for QpCR, clinical response, breast conservation rate, and safety. Results Between June 2002 and June 2004, 202 women were enrolled. Among 191 assessable patients, 25% achieved QpCR. With 40 months median follow-up, 3 year DFS was estimated at 91% for all patients. 3 year DFS for patients with QpCR was 98% vs. 89% without QpCR (hazard ratio 0.38 [95% Confidence Interval 0.09-0.84], P = 0.0134). HER2 status and response to FEC were independent predictors of QpCR. The overall clinical response was 75%; 85% of patients achieved breast conservation. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the most common adverse event, observed in 44% and 35% of patients during FEC and docetaxel, respectively. Treatment related side effects were manageable; there were no treatment related fatalities. Conclusion FEC followed by docetaxel is an active and manageable preoperative regimen for women with early stage breast cancer. QpCR following preoperative chemotherapy predicts favorable DFS. HER2 overexpression and clinical response to FEC predict QpCR.     

The feasibility of FEC (75) as adjuvant chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients

Recently, high-dose FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) has been increasingly used in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Japan. However, the safety and tolerability of high-dose FEC are not well evaluated in Japanese breast cancer patients. We studied the feasibility of FEC (75) (fluorouracil: 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin: 75 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide:500 mg/m(2), q 3 w, 6 cycles) as adjuvant chemotherapy for 59 primary breast cancer patients. Out of these patients, 56 (94.9%) finished 6 cycles-FEC. The mean epirubicin dose received was 431.7 mg/m(2) (95.9% of the intended dose of 450 mg/m(2)). Forty-five (76.2%) of 59 patients experienced neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, while the rates of febrile neutropenia (grade 3) and infection (grade 2) were 3.4% and 10.2%, respectively. Anemia (88.2%), fatigue (42.4%), nausea (40.6%), liver dysfunction (40.7%), and vomiting (18.7%) occurred, however most of them were mild and categorized into grade 1 or 2. No patients developed any cardiac failure symptoms. This study shows FEC (75) is well tolerable as adjuvant chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients.     

Clinical Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Vinorelbine/Epirubicin (NE) with Fluorouracil/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide (FEC)

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of a combination of vinorelbine and epirubicin (NE) with fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) as a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods: Breast cancer patients were treated postoperatively in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Institute from 1997 to 2006 with either the NE regimen (vinorelbine 40mg/m2 iv on day 1 and day 8, epirubicin 50mg/m2 iv on day 1 and day 2, and a cycle repeated every 21-28 days for totally 4-6 cycles) or the FEC regimen (5-Fu 500mg/m2 iv gtt on day 1, epirubicin 50mg/m2 iv on day 1 and day 2, CTX 500mg/m2 iv on day 1 and a cycle repeated every 21-28 days for totally 4-6 cycles). Toxicity was evaluated after each cycle of chemotherapy. Results: Main side effects in both NE and FEC groups were neutropenia and gastrointestinal syndrome, with a 5 year survival rate of 87.9% in the NE and 85.2% in the FEC group. Conclusions: NE regimen is safe with good long-term survival rate, and thus could be recommended as a postoperative chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer.     

Prognostic value of Bcl‐2 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy

We have analyzed the predictive/prognostic value of Bcl‐2 protein in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One hundred and ten patients were submitted to two different chemotherapeutic regimens: a) 5‐fluorouracil, adriamycin or epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC/FEC) during 2–6 cycles before surgery and 3 or 4 additional cycles of FAC/FEC after surgery (n=40) and b) doxorubicin (D) 75mg/m2 or epirubicin (E) 120mg/m2 during 4 cycles before surgery, and 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5‐fluorouracil (CMF) after surgery (n=70). Bcl‐2 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemistry, did not change significantly after chemotherapy and was not related to clinical/pathological response. In FAC/FEC group, Bcl‐2 positive expression after chemotherapy correlated with better disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.008 and P=0.001). In D/E group, Bcl‐2 also correlated with better DFS and OS (P=0.03 and P=0.054) in the post‐chemotherapy biopsies. An unusual nuclear localization of Bax was observed in some biopsies, but this localization did not correlate with the tumor response or outcome of the patients. We found that a high Bcl‐2 expression had no predictive value but had prognostic value in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy.     

Taxane and Anthracycline Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer : Institutional Experience

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the response rates (clinical and pathological ) with docetaxeland epirubicin combination chemotherapy and its effect on outcome. Materials and Methods: We retrospectivelyanalysed locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients who received NACT from January 2008 to December2012 in our tertiary care centre. LABC constituted 37% of all breast cancer cases and 120 patients fulfilled theeligibility criteria. The regimens used for NACT were, six cycles of DEC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 on Day 1, 3 weekly) and a sequential regimen (4 cycles of FEC, 5-flurouracil600 mg/m², epirubicin 75 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel 85 mg/m2).Results: The median age was 47 years (range 23-72). Ninety six ( 80 %) had T4 disease and 90% had clinicallypalpable lymph nodes at diagnosis. The median size of primary tumor at presentation was 5.9 cm. Hormonereceptor positivity was seen in 55% and HER2/neu positivity, in 25%. Triple negative breast cancers constituted25 % of the cases. The overall clinical response rate ( complete or partial ) was 85% and pathological completeresponses were obtained in 15%. Four cases defaulted, 5 patients died of treatment related toxicity and 15%developed febrile neutropenia on DEC. The median duration of follow up was 22 months. The median time torelapse was 20 months and the 3 year relapse free and overall survival rates were 50% and 70% respectively.Conclusions: LABC constituted 37% of all breast cancer cases at our institute. With NACT, pCR was seenin 15% of the cases. Sequential chemotherapy was better tolerated than concurrent anthracyline and taxanechemotherapy with a similar pCR.     

Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The French Adjuvant Study Group 05 (FASG-05) showed that fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, and epirubicin 100 mg/m2 (FEC 100) was superior to the same regimen with epirubicin 50 mg/m2 (FEC 50) in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. We report 10-year data on efficacy, and long-term side effects for FASG-05. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 565 patients to treatment with FEC 50 or FEC 100 after surgery. Postmenopausal patients also received tamoxifen for 3 years, and almost all patients (96%) also received radiotherapy. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 110 months. The 10-year DFS was 45.3% (95% CI, 41.9% to 48.7%) with FEC 50 and 50.7% (95% CI, 47.3% to 54.1%) with FEC 100 (Wilcoxon P = .036; log-rank P = .08). The 10-year OS was 50.0% (95% CI, 46.7% to 53.3%) with FEC 50 and 54.8% (95% CI, 51.3% to 58.3%) with FEC 100 (Wilcoxon P = .038; log-rank P = .05). Delayed cardiac toxicity (before relapse) occurred in four patients (1.5%) in the FEC 50 arm and three patients (1.1%) in the FEC 100 arm. Cardiac toxicity after relapse occurred in six (4.3%) and five (4.1%) patients treated with FEC 50 and FEC 100, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with adjuvant FEC 100 demonstrated superior DFS and OS versus FEC 50 at 10 years of follow-up. This survival advantage was not offset by long-term complications such as cardiac toxicity and second malignancy. Given the risk-benefit ratio, FEC 100 is a more optimal regimen for long-term survival in patients with poor prognosis.     

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant trastuzumab combined with paclitaxel and epirubicin: a retrospective review of the M. D. Anderson experience

BACKGROUND: A previously published prospective randomized phase 3 trial showed that administration of 24 weeks of primary systemic chemotherapy (PST) with paclitaxel and FEC(75) (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) concurrently with trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer resulted in a 60% pathologic complete response rate (PCR) with no associated severe cardiac toxicity. The purpose of this study was to review the efficacy and safety of a similar regimen outside the setting of a clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (defined as either immunohistochemical 3+ or fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive) that had received 24 weeks of neoadjuvant trastuzumab concurrently with taxane and anthracycline-based chemotherapy between 2004 and 2006 were included in the analysis. PST chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 12 weeks followed by 4 cycles of FEC(75) (500 mg/m(2), 75 mg/m(2), and 500 mg/m(2), respectively). RESULTS: Forty patients were identified. The median age was 48 years (range, 29-81). In all, 60% of patients had stage III disease and 4 had inflammatory breast cancer. The PCR rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5%-70.7%). At a median follow-up of 19 months. 5 patients had a recurrence, of which 4 did not achieve a PCR. No severe cardiac events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Stage II and III HER2-positive breast cancer patients achieved a high rate of PCR with trastuzumab given concurrently with paclitaxel and FEC(75) chemotherapy. No severe cardiac events were observed with the regimen. The data concur with the results of a previously published trial.     

Equalization of spread of breast cancer chemotherapy regimen at general hospitals--with EC and FEC regimens

We investigated the differences in safety and management of adverse events of chemotherapy among three hospitals, Sakai Municipal Hospital, Takarazuka Municipal Hospital and National Hospital Organization Osaka-minami Medical Center. The main purpose of this study was to equalize the spread of breast cancer chemotherapy regimen. The following three regimens were evaluated; epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) /cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) (EC75), epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) /cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) /5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) (FEC75) and epirubicin (100 mg/m(2)) / cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) /5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) (FEC100). Sixty-three patients were evaluated. We studied the level of myelosuppression after each regimen. As a result, there was no significant difference in neutrocyte counts at nadir after chemotherapy among hospitals and regimens. However, the values tended to be ranked EC75>FEC75>FEC100. In addition, we examined the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) according to the multi- national association for supportive care in cancer (MASCC) scoring system. Almost all patients (61/63) were in the low risk group of FN, and only two patients had developed FN. At one hospital, patients receiving chemotherapy were prescribed ciprofloxacin tablets prophylactically for prexia over 38 deg C, and the patients learned from it. Thus, no marked difference in the safety (side effects such as myelosuppression) was recognized. However, management of side effects was different among these hospitals. In conclusion, it is very important to provide patients with adequate information on side effects.     

Epirubicin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for poor prognosis, node-negative breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 03 trial

We evaluated the contribution of an epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) in poor prognosis, node-negative breast cancer (BC) patients. Poor prognostic factors were defined as: pathologic tumor size >or= 4 cm, estrogen-receptor negative, and progesterone-receptor negative. Scarff-Bloom Richardson grade 2 tumors must have two of these factors, and only one in case of grade 3. Between 1988 and 1994, 328 patients were randomized to receive either no systemic treatment (control, n = 161), or fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), 6 cycles every 21 days (FEC50, n = 167), without any hormonal treatment. The median follow up was 114 months. The 10-year DFS rates were 64 and 71%, respectively (p = 0.23). In the Cox regression model, independent prognostic factors of relapse were the number of nodes examined < 10 (p = 0.002), BCS (p = 0.01), and premenopausal status (p = 0.04). In this model, the relative risk of relapse was 1.46 (CI95 %: 1.05-1.87) in favor of FEC50. In patients who underwent BCS, 21 % developed a local relapse (24 versus 18 %, respectively). The 10-year local DFS was 70.5 and 79.3 %, respectively (p = 0.27). The 10-year overall survival was not different (74.1 versus 70.7 %, p = 0.82). After 10 years of follow-up, the FEC50 regimen reduced the risk of relapse in poor-prognosis node-negative BC patients. The incidence of local relapse was high, and probably related to inclusion criteria. Epirubicin was probably underdosed in such patients, and ongoing studies using 100 mg/m(2) of epirubicin will give us the answer in a near future.     

Randomized trial comparing six versus three cycles of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 01 trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the duration and dose intensity of epirubicin-based regimens in premenopausal patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1986 and 1990, 621 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil (Roche SA, Basel, Switzerland) 500 mg/m2, epirubicin (Pharmacia SA, Milan, Italy) 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide (Asta Medica AG, Frankfurt, Germany) 500 mg/m2 every 21 days (FEC 50) for six cycles (6 FEC 50); FEC 50 for three cycles (3 FEC 50); or the same regimen with epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (FEC 75) for three cycles (3 FEC 75). All patients in the three arms received chest wall irradiation at the end of the third cycle. RESULTS: After a 131-month median follow-up, the 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 53.4%, 42.5%, and 43.6% (P =.05) in the three arms, respectively. Pairwise comparisons demonstrate that 6 FEC 50 was superior both to 3 FEC 50 (P =.02) and to 3 FEC 75 (P =.05). The 10-year overall survival (OS) for the 6 FEC 50 arm was 64.3%, for the 3 FEC 50 arm it was 56.6%, and for the 3 FEC 75 arm, it was 59.7% (P =.25), respectively. Pairwise comparisons demonstrate that 6 FEC 50 was more effective than 3 FEC 50 (P =.10). Cox regression analysis demonstrates that OS was significantly better in the 6 FEC 50 than in the 3 FEC 50 arm (P =.046). No severe infections (grade 3 to 4), acute cardiac toxicity, or deaths from toxicity have been observed. Only five patients developed delayed cardiac dysfunctions, and three patients developed acute myeloblastic leukemia. CONCLUSION: After a long-term follow-up in an adjuvant setting, the benefit of six cycles of FEC 50 compared with three cycles, whatever the dose, is highly significant in terms of DFS. As regards OS, the group receiving six cycles of FEC 50 has significantly better results than the group receiving three cycles of FEC 50.     

Randomised trial: survival benefit and safety of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer

We evaluated the survival benefit, safety, feasibility, and tolerability of dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel for women with node-positive primary breast cancer. Randomised patients (n=216) received DD or conventional-schedule (CS) chemotherapy. Dose-dense regimen patients (n=108) received epirubicin 90 mg m-2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg m-2 in four 14-day cycles, then cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2, methotrexate 40 mg m-2, and fluorouracil 600 mg m-2 (CMF 600/40/600) in three 14-day cycles, plus filgrastim 5 microg kg day-1 as growth support in every cycle. Conventional-schedule regimen patients (n=108) received epirubicin 90 mg m-2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2 in four 21-day cycles, then CMF 600/40/600 in three 21-day cycles, plus filgrastim if required. After a median follow-up of 38.4 months, 71 patients (33%) relapsed or died: DD, 33 patients (15 deaths); CS, 38 patients (22 deaths). Dose dense showed a trend for improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Four-year rates of DFS and OS were 64 and 85% for DD, and 58 and 75% for CS. All seven cycles were administered to 208 patients (96%). Rates of cycle delay, discontinuation, dose reduction, and adverse events were similar in both groups. Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin/paclitaxel then CMF, supported by filgrastim, is safe and improves survival for patients with node-positive breast cancer.     

GC方案与FEC方案新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌患者的疗效比较

背景与目的:新辅助化疗已成为乳腺癌综合治疗的一个重要手段,但新辅助化疗尚无统一的标准方案.目前,表阿霉素(epirubicin,EPI)联合氟尿嘧啶(5-fluorouracil,5-FU)和环磷酰胺(cyclophosphamide,CTX)的FEC方案,是最为常用的化疗方案;吉西他滨(gemcitabine)作为新兴的化疗药物,其与顺铂(cisplatin)联合的GC方案治疗乳腺癌国内较少报道.本研究旨在分析和比较GC方案与FEC方案新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌的疗效和不良反应.方法:2003年3月至2005年9月,对62例Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者予以术前两个周期的GC方案或FEC方案治疗,3周为1个周期,两个周期结束后评价其疗效和不良反应.GC方案:吉西他滨1 000 mg/m2,第1、8天;顺铂75 mg/m2,第2天,静脉注射.FEC方案:5-FU500 mg/m2,第1、8天,持续4 h静脉滴注;EPI 50 mg/m2,第1天,静脉注射;CTX 500 mg/m2,第1、8天,静脉注射.结果:GC组的总有效率为63.6%(14/22),其中临床完全缓解(clinical complete remission,cCR)4例,临床部分缓解(clinical partial remission,cPR)10例,病情稳定(stabledisease,SD)7例,病理学完全缓解(pathologic completeremission,pCR)2例.FEC方案组的总有效率为72.5%(29/40),cCR 9例,pCR 5例,cPR 20例,SD 9例.GC组白细胞减少较多见(18/22),FEC组贫血多见(29/40),两组比较均有显著性差异(P＜0.05);胃肠道反应程度两组相似;GC组脱发发生率较FEC组多见(5/22,4/40),但均为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度;GC组1例发生口腔粘膜炎;两组均未见肾毒性、神经毒性,且无死亡相关病例.结论:两种新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌疗效和不良反应相当,均能较好耐受.FEC方案疗效略好于GC方案.     

Less efficacy with alternating regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II node-positive breast cancer: results at 8 years (Pronacam 85).

A randomized trial to compare adjuvant treatment with an alternating regimen with conventional chemotherapy was performed. A total of 589 node-positive patients were included and stratified according to number of positive nodes (N1-3 and N > 4) and menopausal status. Premenopausal N1-3 patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) or CMF/4''-epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (EC), post-menopausal N1-3 patients to fluorouracil, 4 epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) or CMF/EC and pre- and post-menopausal patients with N > or = 4 to fluorouracil, 4'' epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, prednisone (FECMP) or CMF/EC. In premenopausal patients, CMF was superior to CMF/EC in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (65% vs 45%, P = 0.0149) and survival (72.3% vs 50.2%, P = 0.0220) whereas, for N > or = 4 patients, differences between FECMP and CMF/EC did not achieve statistical significance (DFS 35% vs 26.2%; survival 50% vs 38.1%, P = NS). For post-menopausal patients, FEC was superior to CMF/EC in DFS (58.6% vs 36.8%, P = 0.0215) and survival (66.2% vs 46%, P = 0.0155). In post-menopausal patients with N > 4, differences favouring CMF/EC were significant in DFS (40.4% vs 22%, P = 0.0371) but not in survival (47.4% vs 32.2%, P = 0.1185). Alternating regimens did not offer better results in premenopausal and post-menopausal N1-3 patients. Results regarding post-menopausal N > 4 women require further confirmation.     

Complete hormonal blockade versus epirubicin-based chemotherapy in premenopausal, one to three node-positive, and hormone-receptor positive, early breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 06 randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine optimal adjuvant therapy between complete hormonal blockade in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer and one to three positive nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomised 333 patients to receive either LHRH agonist (triptorelin 3.75 mg i.m., monthly) plus tamoxifen 30 mg/day for 3 years (TAM-LHRHa, n=164), or fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 21 days for six cycles, without any hormonal treatment (FEC50, n=169). RESULTS: The 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 76% with TAM-LHRHa, and 72% with FEC50 (P=0.13). The 7-year overall survival (OS) was 91% and 88%, respectively (P=0.20). The multivariate analysis confirmed that both treatments were not different for DFS and OS (P=0.83 and P=0.41, respectively). Amenorrhoea occurred in 64% of patients treated with FEC50; it was temporary in 58% of cases after hormonotherapy and in 31% after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In intermediate-risk breast cancer, complete hormonal blockade and chemotherapy provided similar outcomes. Hormonal treatment is an alternative to chemotherapy in hormone-sensitive patients, considering the preference of patients in terms of quality of life.     

Randomized,controlled, multicenter phase III trial of standard-dose fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC), compared with time-intensive FEC (FEC-G) and mitoxantrone-methotrexate-mitomycin C (MMM-G) in metastatic breast carcinoma

The purpose of this multicenter phase III trial was to assess the impact of a time-intensification of FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and MMM (mitoxantrone, methotrexate, mitomycin C) regimens, supported by lenograstim (G-CSF) on the objective response rate, time to progression and survival of patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic breast cancer (mbc). Women with mbc were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard-dose FEC (all doses in mg/m2): arm A (500, 75, 500 every 21 days), or time-intensified FEC-G: arm B (500, 75, 500 every 14 days), or time-intensified MMM-G: arm C (mitoxantrone 10, methotrexate 35 every 14 days and mitomycin C 10 every 28 days), both with support of lenograstim (G-CSF 150 microg/m2/day s.c. for 10 days). All study treatments were administered for six cycles. Eligible female patients were in the 31-70 year range with histologically proven mbc, and measurable or evaluable disease. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. The overall response rate (CR + PR, intent-to-treat analysis) was significantly improved in the time-intensified FEC-G regimen (69%) in comparison with standard-dose FEC (41%), p=0.002. Time-intensified MMM-G (51%) did not lead to a significant improvement in the response rate. The percentage of complete responses was significantly higher in the FEC-G arm as compared to standard-dose FEC (17% vs. 4.7%; p=0.002). The median duration was longer in the intensified-dose arms without, however, achieving a statistically significant improvement. The median time to progression (TTP), and the median survival time did not differ between the three treatment arms. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the standard FEC regimen-treated patients. Thrombocytopenia was significantly higher (p<0.001) in both intensified regimens. Alopecia and mucositis were significantly more frequent in both anthracycline-containing regimens (p=0.003). Other hematological and non hematological toxicities were similar in the 3 treatment arms. The increase of dose-intensity of both FEC and MMM regimens improved activity, but not efficacy as compared to standard FEC regimen in our group of chemotherapy-naive, metastatic breast cancer patients.     

A phase II study on the safety and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer

The incorporation of a taxane into an anthracycline-containing regimen in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer is a promising approach. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of four cycles of FEC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 70 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, every 3 weeks) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) in the adjuvant treatment of node-positive and other high-risk breast cancer patients. A total of 88 female patients were enrolled. Mean age (+/- SD) of the patients was 47 +/- 10 (min: 24; max: 71). The patients were followed for a median of 48 months (min: 20; max: 64). The most common side effects were nausea-vomiting (grade I-II: 91%; grade III: 2%), as well as hematological toxicity (grade I-II: 70%; grade III: 3%). Although all patients experienced some degree of toxicity, it was severe enough to be classified as grade III or IV in only 10 (11%) of the cases. Of note, six (8%) patients had grade I and only one (1%) had grade II cardiotoxicity. No grade III or IV cardiotoxicity was observed. The full eight cycles of study treatment could be administered to 75 patients (85%). Side effects necessitated the reduction of the doses of FEC and paclitaxel in one (1%) and three patients (3%), respectively. Median overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) have not yet been reached. Five-year OS and DFS have been estimated to be 78% and 61%, respectively. We conclude that FEC followed by paclitaxel is a well-tolerated and feasible regimen in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Its efficacity is comparable with other commonly used regimens and merits evaluation in a phase III study.     

Secondary leukemia after epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients: 16 years experience of the French Adjuvant Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among eight French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 3653 patients were assessable: 2603 received epirubicin; 682 received hormonotherapy; and 368 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 85% of cases (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50, 75 or 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, three or six cycles). Epirubicin cumulative dose was <300 mg/m2 in 1045 patients; 300-600 mg/m2 in 1187; and > or =600 mg/m2 in 286, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. The median follow-up was 104 months. RESULTS: Eight cases of leukemia occurred in epirubicin-exposed patients and one in non-exposed patients. After 9 years, the risk of developing a leukemia was 0.34% (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.57) in epirubicin-exposed patients. In patients receiving chemotherapy, leukemia subtypes were: AML2 (two), AML3 (one), AML4 (three) and ALL (two). None of the classically recognized risk factors was significantly correlated with the occurrence of a leukemia. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the dose, the incidence of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy was low. After a long follow-up, the benefit/risk ratio for early breast cancer patients remained in favor of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: eight cases (0.31%) occurred, and in some of them, treatment causality could be debatable.     

Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and either epirubicin or mitoxantrone: a comparative randomized multicenter study in metastatic breast carcinoma

From February 1987 to January 1989, 60 patients with advanced breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized and studied, with 31 treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and 29 patients with fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide (FNC). Doses were 500 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, and 50 mg/m2 epirubicin2 or 10 mg/m mitoxantrone, i.v. Day 1 every 3 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment patient characteristics between the groups. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for response (29 in the FEC arm and 27 in the FNC arm). The response rates were 48.2% for the FEC group (complete response (CR) 10.3% and partial response (PR) 37.9%) and 40.7% for the FNC group (CR 3.7% and PR 37%) (not significantly different, NS). The median response duration was 247 and 267 days, respectively (NS), the median time to progression and time to treatment failure was 244 and 155.5 days for the FEC group and 86 and 98 days for the FNC group, respectively (NS). The incidence of nausea/vomiting was 87.1% in the FEC group and 79.3% in the FNC group, with comparable severity. Alopecia occurred in 80.6% of FEC patients and 44.8% of FNC patients (p less than 0.05). The incidences and degrees of severity of leukopenia, anemia, and cardiotoxicity were comparable in the two treatment groups. Efficacy and toxicity of the two regimens were quite similar. FNC can improve the quality of life of patients by providing significantly less alopecia.     

Long-term cardiac follow-up in relapse-free patients after six courses of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, with either 50 or 100 mg of epirubicin, as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: French adjuvant study group.

PURPOSE To evaluate long-term cardiac function in patients without disease who had received six cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (FEC 50) or the same regimen with epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) (FEC 100) as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer in the French Adjuvant Study Group-05 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifty patients (FEC 50, n = 65; FEC 100, n = 85) who were without disease and who gave their informed consent were enrolled for long-term cardiac assessment. The assessment included cardiac events occurring after the end of chemotherapy, vital signs, concomitant disease, ECG, isotopic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and echographic parameters. Abnormal files were blindly reviewed by cardiologists and oncologists. Results The median follow-up time was 102 months. After FEC 100, LVEF was less than 50% in five patients (radioisotopic method), and two patients experienced congestive heart failure (CHF) that was possibly related to treatment. Asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) was experienced in 18 patients after FEC 100 and in one patient after FEC 50. In these patients, treatment causality was probable in eight patients. Two additional years after this assessment, all 18 patients were still asymptomatic. CONCLUSION After more than 8 years of follow-up, the cardiac toxicity observed after adjuvant treatment with FEC 100 comprised two cases of well-controlled CHF and 18 cases of asymptomatic LVD. In the majority of women with primary breast cancer, the benefits of treatment with FEC 100 in terms of disease-free and overall survival outweigh the risks, and cardiac risk factors should be carefully evaluated in patient selection.     

Gemcitabine, epirubicin, and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a Central European Cooperative Oncology Group International, multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this phase III trial were to compare the time to progressive disease (TtPD), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, and toxicity of gemcitabine, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (GET) versus fluorouracil (FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients aged 18 to 75 years with stage IV and measurable MBC were enrolled and randomly assigned to either gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2), days 1 and 4), epirubicin (90 mg/m(2), day 1), and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), day 1) or FU (500 mg/m(2), day 1), epirubicin (90 mg/m(2), day 1), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2), day 1). Both regimens were administered every 21 days for a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: Between October 1999 and November 2002, 259 patients (GET, n = 124; FEC, n = 135) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were well balanced across treatment arms. After a median of 20.4 months of follow-up, median TtPD was 9.1 months and 9.0 months in the GET and FEC arms, respectively (P = .557). The ORR was 62.3% in the GET arm (n = 114) and 51.2% in the FEC arm (n = 129; P = .093). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, stomatitis, neurosensory toxicity, and allergy, occurred significantly more often in the GET arm. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in terms of TtPD and ORR were observed between the two treatment arms. Treatment-related toxicity was higher in the GET arm.