Combination ACE inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor antagonist therapy in diabetic nephropathy

The benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (i) therapy in diabetic glomerulosclerosis is thought to be largely the result of attenuation of angiotensin II (AngII) effects on blood pressure, glomerular hemodynamics and hypertrophy, and tissue fibrosis. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of AngII receptor antagonist therapy to ACEi therapy in diabetic nephropathy results in attenuation of AngII effects beyond that achieved by ACEi therapy alone. Seven patients were studied as inpatients on the General Clinical Research Center each for 3 consecutive weeks as follows: week 1, the patients' usual regimen which included daily oral moderate to high dose ACEi therapy; week 2, the patients' usual regimen plus oral losartan (an antagonist (a) of the angiotensin type 1 receptor, AT1) 50 mg (n = 3) or 100 mg (n = 4) daily; week 3, return to the patients' usual regimen. Diet, physical activity, and blood glucose were held as constant as possible during the three weeks of daily testing. We found that plasma renin levels increased significantly during combination therapy and then returned to baseline values with discontinuation of AT1a therapy: mean baseline renin values (week 1) 3.0 ng/ml/min +/- 1.1 SE, mean renin values during combination therapy (week 2) 7.0 ng/ml/min +/- 3.2 (p = 0.0078 by Wilcoxon rank sum test), mean renin values after discontinuation of AT1a therapy (week 3) 3.9 ng/ml/min +/- 2.0 (NS compared to baseline values). In addition, 2 patients developed transient hypotension when losartan therapy was initiated. During this short-term study, 24-hour proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum potassium, and plasma aldosterone were not changed significantly by combination therapy. We conclude that in patients with diabetic nephropathy addition of AT1a therapy to ACEi therapy attenuates AngII effects better than ACEi therapy alone. We suggest that combination therapy for the management of diabetic glomerulosclerosis merits further investigation.     

ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist attenuates diabetic neuropathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

ACE inhibition and/or blocking of the angiotensin II receptor are recognized as first-line treatment for nephropathy and cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. However, little information is available about the potential benefits of these drugs on diabetic neuropathy. We examined vascular and neural activity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats that were treated for 12 weeks with enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, or L-158809, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. A prevention protocol (group 1) as well as three intervention protocols (treatment was initiated after 4, 8, or 12 weeks of diabetes [groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively]) were used. Endoneurial blood flow and motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) were impaired in all groups of untreated diabetic rats. In group 1, treatment of diabetic rats with enalapril or L-158809 partially prevented the diabetes-induced decrease in endoneurial blood flow and MNCV. In groups 2-4, intervention with enalapril was more effective in reversing the diabetes-induced impairment in endoneurial blood flow and MNCV than L-158809. The superoxide level in the aorta and epineurial arterioles of diabetic rats was increased. Treatment of diabetic rats with enalapril or L-158809 reduced the superoxide level in the aorta in all groups but was less effective in epineurial arterioles. Acetylcholine and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) cause vasodilation in epineurial arterioles of the sciatic nerve, which was impaired by diabetes. Treatment of diabetic rats (all groups) with enalapril or L-158809 completely prevented/reversed the diabetes-induced impairment in CGRP-mediated vascular relaxation. Treatment with enalapril or L-158809 was also effective in improving impaired acetylcholine-mediated vasodilation, but the efficacy was diminished from groups 1 to 4. These studies suggest that ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers may be effective treatments for diabetes and vascular and neural dysfunction. However, the efficacy of these treatments may be dependent on when the treatment is initiated.     

The effect of withdrawal of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers prior to coronary angiography on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy

Background

The effect of continuing or discontinuing chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy prior to coronary angiography on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is not clear. We undertook a randomized trial to evaluate the effect of withdrawing ACEIs or ARBs 24 h prior to coronary angiography on the incidence of CIN associated with coronary angiography.

Methods

A total of 220 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3–4 (glomerular filtration rate 15–60 ml/min/1.73 m²) on ACEI or ARB therapy were randomized before angiography to either ACEI/ARB continuation group or discontinuation group. A third group of patients with CKD stages 3–4 but not on angiotensin blockade therapy were also followed. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of CIN defined by a rise in serum creatinine by 25% or 0.5 mg/dl (44 μmol/l) from baseline.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of CIN between the three groups (P = 0.66). The incidences were 6.2%, 3.7%, and 6.3% for the continuation, discontinuation, and angiotensin blockade naïve group, respectively. There was also no significant difference found between the groups in mean serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate values at baseline and post contrast administration.

Conclusion

Withholding ACEIs and ARBs 24 h before coronary angiography does not appear to influence the incidence of CIN in stable patients with CKD stages 3–4.     

The association between angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use during postischemic acute transplant failure and renal allograft survival

BACKGROUND: Postischemic acute renal transplant failure occurs in approximately one fourth of all dead donor transplantations. Uncertainty exists regarding the putative association between the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and kidney transplant graft survival in patients with delayed allograft function. METHODS: We conducted an open cohort study of all 436 patients who experienced an acute renal transplant failure out of all 2,031 subjects who received their first kidney transplant at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2003. Actual and functional graft survival was compared between users and nonusers of ACEI/ARB using exposure propensity score models and time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: Ten-year actual graft survival averaged 44% in the ACEI/ARB group, but only 32% in patients without ACEI/ARB (P=0.002). The hazard ratio of actual graft failure was 0.58 (95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.80, P=0.002) for ACEI/ARB users compared with nonconsumers. Seventy-one percent of subjects with ACEI/ARB had a functional graft at 10 years versus 64% of ACEI/ARB nonusers (P=0.027). The hazard ratio of functional graft loss was 0.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.91, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Use of ACEI/ARB in patients experiencing delayed allograft function was associated with longer actual and functional transplant survival.     

Successful treatment of combination therapy using an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker in a patient with IgA nephropathy

A 24-year-old Japanese woman with IgA nephropathy was admitted to our hospital due to the development of proteinuria and pretibial edema while on glucocorticoids and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme(ACE) inhibitor. She had been on both medications for more than 2 years. Urinary protein excretion was 2.53 g/day and renal function laboratory data were within the normal range. Plasma aldosterone concentration was high at 248 pg/ml, with normal plasma renin activity. The renal biopsy specimens showed prominent glomerular hypertrophy. Four weeks after the addition of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker(ARB), urinary protein excretion was remarkably reduced to 0.6 g/day without adversely affecting blood pressure. During the treatment period, proteinuria was maintained at less than 0.6 g/day and renal function remained normal. We propose that glomerular hypertension caused by insufficient suppression of the renin-angiotensin system was an essential factor underlying the increased urinary protein excretion in this patient. Combination therapy of an ARB and an ACE inhibitor appears to have a beneficial effect in patients with IgA nephropathy patients with persistent glomerular hypertension.     

缬沙坦与贝那普利联用治疗移植肾慢性损伤的远期效果

目的 探讨血管紧张素受体拮抗剂缬沙坦与血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂贝那普利联合应用治疗肾移植患者移植肾慢性损伤的远期效果. 方法非糖尿病患者肾移植术后尿蛋白＞0.5g/d或SCr＞177 mmol/L(＞2 mg/d)32例,随机分2组:①治疗组23例.男9例,女14例.平均40岁.病理诊断慢性移植物肾病(CAN)13例、环孢素中毒3例、肾小球疾病7例.②对照组9例.男4例,女5例.平均35岁.CAN 6例、环孢素中毒1例、肾小球疾病2例.治疗组给予缬沙坦(80mg/d)与贝那普利(20 mg,2次/d)联合治疗3年,对照组未进行此项处理.比较2组患者治疗前后SCr、24 h尿蛋白变化及移植肾生存时间.结果 随访3年后,治疗组SCr为(252.2±117.9)mmol/L,对照组为(375.3±203.0)mmol/L,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).治疗组CAN患者SCr为(282.4±147.3)mmol/L,对照组为(528.7±107.8)mmol/L,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).治疗组24 h尿蛋白为(1.0±0.6)g,对照组为(1.3±0.7)g,组问差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).移植肾存活时间治疗组76个月,对照组为71个月,组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 缬沙坦与贝那普利联合应用可保护移植肾功能,对蛋白尿及移植肾远期存活的影响有待进一步观察.     

ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in dialysed patients and erythropoietin resistance

BACKGROUND: To examine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with a state of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) resistance in hemodialyzed patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study involving all dialysis facilities in French-speaking Switzerland. All patients treated with rHuEPO in March 2001 were included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected in 515 patients treated with chronic hemodialysis (HD) and rHuEPO. Patients were classified into five groups according to their antihypertensive treatment. The main outcomes of the study were the mean rHuEPO dosage and the prevalence of erythropoietin EPO resistance among the groups. Erythropoietin resistance was defined as a weekly rHuEPO dosage >300 units/kg/wk. RESULTS: The mean rHuEPO dosage and the prevalence of EPO resistance were similar in patients treated with ACEIs (n = 138, mean EPO dosage 109 units/kg/wk, EPO resistance 12%), ARBs (n = 59, mean EPO dosage 120 units/kg/wk, EPO resistance 7%), both (n = 10, mean EPO dosage 109 units/kg/wk, EPO resistance 10%), other drugs (n = 137, mean EPO dosage 110 units/kg/wk, EPO resistance 10%) and no antihypertensive treatment (n = 171, mean EPO dosage 90 units/kg/wk, EPO resistance 9%). Differences were not statistically significant. Patients with rHuEPO resistance were characterized by a higher frequency of hospitalization and a more pronounced inflammatory state. There was no difference in the use of ACEIs and ARBs between patients with and without EPO resistance (37 vs. 41%, ns). CONCLUSIONS: Neither the use of ACEIs nor ARBs is associated with a state of rHuEPO resistance among hemodialyzed patients.     

Intraoperative angioedema induced by angiotensin II receptor blocker: a case report

Background

Angiotensin II receptor blockers are a class of antihypertensive agent that is developed to exclude the adverse effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. However, as angiotensin II receptor blockers have begun to be more widely prescribed, cases of angiotensin II receptor blocker-induced angioedema have been reported. Rare cases of angioedema following surgery in patients using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have been published.

Case presentation

A 38-year-old man with past history of hypertension was admitted for an elective lumbosacral spine surgery. He had been taking Valsartan 160 mg a day for the past 4 years.At the end of the surgical procedure and turning the patient into supine position, we noticed severe swelling in the neck and the face with.an edematous tongue, floor of the mouth, glottis, and supraglottic areas. A diagnosis of drug induced angioedema was made and intravenous dexamethasone, diphenhydramine and ranitidine were given. The patient remained intubated and was transferred to the intensive care unit. The valsartan was suspected to be the precipitating factor for the angioedema and was therefore discontinued.The swelling started to regress after 2 h, and resolved completely by the third day.

Conclusion

The precise mechanism of angiotensin II receptor blocker-induced angioedema is still unknown and should be thoroughly investigated. This report demonstrates a unique case of intraoperative angiotensin II receptor blocker-induced angioedema. Potential differential diagnoses of postoperative facial edema are discussed in detail, including the prolonged prone positioning for posterior spine surgery. Anesthesiologists should be aware of such rare, but potentially dangerous, perioperative adverse reaction that can occur with angiotensin II receptor blockers use.

     

ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in IgA nephropathy with mild proteinuria: the ACEARB study

Few studies have investigated IgA nephropathy patients presenting with 'favorable' clinical features at onset, such as normal renal function, proteinuria<1 g/24 hours and the absence of hypertension, and no controlled clinical trials have tested the effects of treatment in such patients who may nevertheless develop end-stage renal disease. It is therefore important to find a well-tolerated and economic therapy capable of decreasing their risk of high proteinuria and blood pressure levels. The aim of this multicenter open-label randomized clinical trial is to test whether blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) decreases the risk of progression in patients aged 3-60 years with biopsy-proven benign IgA glomerulonephritis, proteinuria levels of 0.3-0.9 g/24 hours, and normal renal function and blood pressure. The RAS is blocked by first using a single drug class (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker), and then combining the 2 classes as soon as the 1-drug blockade has become ineffective. We plan to enroll 378 patients over the next 3 years and randomize them to receive ramipril 5 mg/day (3 mg/m2 in children) (group A), irbesartan 300 mg/day (175 mg/m 2 in children) (group B) or supportive therapy (group C); if an increase in proteinuria of at least 50% from baseline is detected after 6 months of treatment, the other RAS inhibitor will be added. The observation period will be at least 5 years (except in the case of the development of the primary end point).     

Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy in non-diabetic elderly patients with renal impairment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Metabolic syndrome (MS) as a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has not been studied. The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of MS on the development of CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 219 non-diabetic patients with reduced kidney function and age >or=60 years were divided into two groups (MS, n = 107 and non-MS, n = 112). CIN was defined as an increase of >or=25% in creatinine over the baseline value within 48 h of angiography. RESULTS: CIN occurred in 14% of the MS group and 3.6% of the non-MS group (p = 0.006). Serum creatinine increased from 1.06 +/- 0.17 to 1.12 +/- 0.27 mg/dl in the MS group and from 1.03 +/- 0.17 to 1.09 +/- 0.23 mg/dl in the non-MS group (p < 0.001). MS was a risk indicator of CIN [odds ratio (OR) 4.26; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.19-15.25; p = 0.026). Impaired fasting glucose (OR 4.72; 95% CI 1.53-14.56; p = 0.007), high triglyceride (OR 4.06; 95% CI 1.22-13.44; p = 0.022), and multivessel involvement (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.07-9.82; p = 0.038) in the MS group were predictors of CIN. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that patients with MS are at risk of developing CIN.     

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor but not angiotensin receptor blockade or statin ameliorates murine adriamycin nephropathy

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and statins have renoprotective effects. We studied the cellular mechanisms for this effect in adriamycin-treated mice receiving captopril, losartan, simvastatin, or their combinations. The mice developed albuminuria, renal insufficiency, and parenchymal inflammation/fibrosis accompanied by overexpression of intrarenal converting enzyme and angiotensin II. Only captopril consistently improved these abnormalities and reduced the cortical expression of several proinflammatory and profibrotic factors including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). These effects were independent of blood pressure, accompanied by increased urine N-acetylseryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (Ac-SDKP) levels, and the restoration of renal angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II to baseline levels. Losartan or simvastatin alone or together had no effect, and their addition to captopril did not enhance protection. In vitro, angiotensin II stimulated TGF-beta in renal tubular cells via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Captopril or Ac-SDKP suppressed angiotensin II-induced MAPK activation and TGF-beta secretion. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition confers renoprotection in adriamycin nephropathy by reducing intrarenal angiotensin II and augmenting Ac-SDKP expression that together attenuate MAPK signaling and its downstream proinflammatory and fibrogenic properties. The addition of receptor blocker and/or statin failed to potentiate such effects.     

Effect of preoperative angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use on the frequency of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a cohort study from the atrial fibrillation suppression trials II and III.

BACKGROUND: Two recent meta-analyses demonstrated that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce the risk of developing new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) by nearly 50%. However, the ability of ACEIs or ARBs to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery has not been adequately evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the impact of preoperative ACEI or ARB use on the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valvular surgery from the (atrial fibrillation suppression trials II and III (AFIST II and III) randomized, controlled trials were evaluated in this cohort evaluation. Data in respect to patient demographics, surgical characteristics, medication utilization and the incidence of POAF (defined as AF lasting at least 5 min in duration documented by telemetry) were all uniformly and prospectively collected as part of AFIST II and III. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 338 patients were evaluated of which 175 (51.8%) received an ACEI or ARB preoperatively and 163 (48.2%) did not. The study population was 65.7+/-9.1 years of age, 77.8% were male, 11.2% underwent valve surgery, 3.6% had prior AF, 10.1% had heart failure and 84.0 and 37.9% received postoperative beta-blockade and prophylactic amiodarone, respectively. In total, 110 (32.5%) patients developed POAF. Upon multivariate logistic regression, the preoperative use of an ACEI or ARB was not found to be associated with a statistically significant reduction in POAF (adjusted odds ratio; 0.71, 95% CIs 0.42-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative ACEI or ARB use reduced the odds of developing POAF by 29%, this association with not found to be statistically significant. A study with approximately 600 subjects would be needed to discern if ACEIs or ARBs truly impact POAF.     

Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy

Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. This study tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-I) and an Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to either drug alone in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). A randomized double-blind crossover trial was performed with 8-wk treatment with placebo, 20 mg of benazepril once daily, 80 mg of valsartan once daily, and the combination of 20 mg of benazepril and 80 mg of valsartan. Twenty type I diabetic patients with DN were included. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-h BP, and GFR were measured. Eighteen patients completed the study. Placebo values were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 701 (490 to 1002) mg/24 h; BP [mean (SEM)], 144 (4)/79 (2) mmHg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 82 (7) ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Treatment with benazepril, valsartan, or dual blockade significantly reduced albuminuria and BP compared with placebo. Benazepril and valsartan were equally effective. Dual blockade induced an additional reduction in albuminuria of 43 % (29 to 54 %) compared with any type of monotherapy, and a reduction in systolic BP of 6 (0 to 13) mmHg and 7 (1 to 14) mmHg (versus benazepril and valsartan, respectively) and a reduction of 7 (4 to 10) mmHg diastolic compared with both monotherapies. GFR was reversibly reduced on dual blockade compared with monotherapy and placebo. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, dual blockade of the RAS may offer additional renal and cardiovascular protection in type I diabetic patients with DN.     

Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II receptor antagonist

Type 2 diabetes is an ever-growing problem worldwide. Approximately 40% of the patients with type 2 diabetes will develop diabetic kidney disease. In the United States, diabetes has become the most common single cause of endstage renal disease defined by the need for dialysis or transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy have a dramatically increased cardiovascular risk. The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial was designed to determine whether the use of irbesartan or a calcium channel blocker would provide protection against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes beyond that attributable to the lowering of blood pressure. In that study, 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to irbesartan 300 mg/day or amlodipine 10 mg/day, or placebo. All patients randomized in this trial had more than 900 mg of protein in their urine and serum creatinines between 1.0 mg/dl and 3.0 mg/dl. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mmHg or less in all groups. The primary outcome was time to a combined endpoint of doubling of their baseline serum creatinine concentration, the development of endstage renal disease, or death from any cause. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite endpoint that was 20% lower than that in the placebo group (P = 0.02) and 23% lower than that in the amlodipine group (P = 0.006). The risk of doubling of the serum creatinine concentration was 33% lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group (P = 0.003) and 37% lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group (P < 0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of endstage renal disease that was 23% lower than that in both other groups. These differences were not accounted for by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. Proteinuria was reduced on average by 33% in the irbesartan group as compared with 6% in the amlodipine group and 10% in the placebo group. The angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan was shown to be effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. In a study done in patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy as manifested by microalbuminuria, 590 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg/day or irbesartan 300 mg/day and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome in that trial was the time to the onset of diabetic nephropathy, defined by persistent albuminuria in overnight specimens, with a urinary albumin excretion rate that was more than 200 mg/min or at least 30% higher than the baseline level. The irbesartan 150 mg/day group demonstrated a 39% relative risk reduction versus the control group in the development of overt proteinuria. The irbesartan 300 mg/day group demonstrated a highly significant 70% risk reduction versus the control group (P < 0.001). The albumin excretion rate was reduced in the two irbesartan groups throughout the study (−11% and −38% at 24 months compared with baseline in the irbesartan 150-mg and 300-mg groups, respectively). The albumin excretion rate remained unchanged in the control group. Irbesartan was demonstrated in the above study to be renoprotective, independent of its blood pressure-lowering effect, in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Thus, irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, was demonstrated to be significantly renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes with either early nephropathy (microalbuminuria) or late nephropathy (proteinuria). The renoprotective effects of irbesartan were above and beyond the effects irbesartan had on systemic blood pressure. Patients with type 2 diabetes and either early or late diabetic nephropathy should be treated with the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan. Received: October 18, 2002 / Accepted: December 17, 2002 Correspondence to:E.J. Lewis     

对比剂肾病的预防及危险分层的研究进展

随着对比剂的广泛应用,对比剂肾病（CIN）发病率逐年增高。根据CIN的危险因素进行危险分层,合理使用对比剂能够有效预防CIN的发生。本文就CIN的预防及危险分层方面的研究进展进行综述。     

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan attenuates graft vasculopathy

OBJECTIVE: Transplant arteriosclerosis remains the major cause of graft failure after cardiac transplantation, although recent progress in immunosuppressive therapy has dramatically improved short-term survival of recipient. We investigated the effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R) blocker candesartan on the development of transplant arteriosclerosis in a murine model of cardiac transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hearts from DBA/2 (H-2(d)) mice were heterotopically transplanted into B10.D2 (H-2(d)) mice. Recipients were treated with oral administration of candesartan (1 mg/kg per day) or vehicle. Allografts were analyzed at 14 or 30 days after transplantation. RESULTS: Candesartan significantly reduced the development of coronary arteriosclerosis (intima/media ratio: 0.86 +/- 0.09 versus 0.57 +/- 0.10, P < 0.05), without affecting the degree of parenchymal rejection at 30 days. There was no significant difference in the expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines at 14 days. Candesartan significantly reduced the number of peripheral mononuclear cells that differentiated into smooth muscle-like cells in the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor BB (27.1 +/- 3.1 versus 17.3 +/- 1.8 cells/HPF, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II may play a role in the pathogenesis of transplant arteriosclerosis. Blockade of AT(1)R might be effective as a prophylactic therapy for transplant arteriosclerosis along with conventional immunosuppressive drugs.     

Long-term beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for patients with advanced immunoglobulin A nephropathy and impaired renal function

Background  

There are few reports analyzing the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on the long-term renal survival of advanced immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients.