PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在尿路上皮癌治疗中的研究进展

近年来,随着人们对肿瘤免疫生物学认识的不断深入,针对免疫检查点抑制的系统免疫疗法在尿路上皮癌领域得到了广泛的探索和临床应用。程序性细胞死亡受体1(programmed death 1,PD-1)及其配体(programmed death ligand 1,PD-L1)是机体免疫活性的重要负性调节因子,可防止正常组织和自身免疫功能的破坏。迄今为止,美国食品和药物管理局(Food and Drug Administration,FDA)已批准了可阻断PD-1(Pembrolizumab和Nivolumab)或PD-L1(Atezolizumab、Durvalumab和Avelumab)的五种免疫检查点抑制剂,根据在相关临床试验中观察到的持久的治疗反应和可控的安全性,用于局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的一线或二线治疗。本文就PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在尿路上皮癌中的研究进展作一综述。     

Combination Treatment of the Oral CHK1 Inhibitor,SRA737, and Low-Dose Gemcitabine Enhances the Effect of Programmed Death Ligand 1 Blockade by Modulating the Immune Microenvironment in SCLC

IntroductionDespite the enthusiasm surrounding cancer immunotherapy, most SCLC patients show very modest response to immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy treatment. Therefore, there is growing interest in combining immune checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy and other treatments to enhance immune checkpoint blockade efficacy. Based on favorable clinical trial results, chemotherapy and immunotherapy combinations have been recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for frontline treatment for SCLC.Methods and ResultsHere, we show that combined treatment of SRA737, an oral CHK1 inhibitor, and anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) leads to an antitumor response in multiple cancer models, including SCLC. We further show that combining low, non-cytotoxic doses of gemcitabine with SRA737 + anti–PD-L1/anti–PD-1 significantly increased antitumorigenic CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, dendritic cells, and M1 macrophage populations in an SCLC model. This regimen also led to a significant decrease in immunosuppressive M2 macrophage and myeloid-derived suppressor cell populations, as well as an increase in the expression of the type I interferon beta 1 gene, IFNβ, and chemokines, CCL5 and CXCL10.ConclusionsGiven that anti–PD-L1/anti–PD-1 drugs have recently been approved as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of SCLC, and that the SRA737 + low dose gemcitabine regimen is currently in clinical trials for SCLC and other malignancies, our preclinical data provide a strong rational for combining this regimen with inhibitors of the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway.     

The Significance of the PD-L1 Expression in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Trenchant Double Swords as Predictive and Prognostic Markers

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death due to cancer worldwide. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have been the standard treatment for lung cancer, and targeted molecular therapy has greatly improved the clinical course of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring driver mutations, such as in epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase genes. Despite advances in such therapies, the prognosis of patients with NSCLC without driver oncogene mutations remains poor. Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has recently been shown to improve the survival in advanced NSCLC. The PD-L1 expression on the surface of tumor cells has emerged as a potential biomarker for predicting responses to immunotherapy and prognosis after surgery in NSCLC. However, the utility of PD-L1 expression as a predictive and prognostic biomarker remains controversial because of the existence of various PD-L1 antibodies, scoring systems, and positivity cutoffs. In this review, we summarize the data from representative clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC and previous reports on the association between PD-L1 expression and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Furthermore, we discuss the future perspectives of immunotherapy and immune checkpoint factors.     

Association of Tumor Mutational Burden With DNA Repair Mutations and Response to Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PurposeTo examine clinical predictors of tumor mutational burden (TMB), to explore the association between TMB and DNA repair mutations, and to analyze TMB as a biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade in non–small-cell lung cancer.Patients and MethodsTMB scores were determined retrospectively for 72 consecutive patients at our institution with next-generation sequencing comprehensive genomic profiling testing by Foundation Medicine. TMB scores were correlated with a number of clinical variables and presence of DNA repair mutations. Thirty-four patients were treated with anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies, and survival analyses based on TMB score were performed. In addition, tissue immunohistochemical analysis was performed for a subset of patients.ResultsHistory of smoking, but not other clinical variables, including prior treatment lines, stage of disease, and number of metastatic sites, predicted higher TMB score. Higher TMB score was significantly associated with greater number of DNA repair mutations. In the subset of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade, higher TMB score significantly predicted overall survival, but not progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.10, P = .003; hazard ratio 1.1, P = .84, respectively). In a small subset of patients, PD-1/PD-L1 staining did not independently predict progression-free survival or overall survival.ConclusionTissue TMB was significantly associated with smoking history and number of DNA repair mutations. TMB is a promising biomarker for response to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, with higher TMB score predicting longer overall survival.     

Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in non–small cell lung cancer

The last decade has witnessed rapid advances in the discovery and development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer medicine, particularly drugs targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The proven antitumor efficacy coupled with low rates of drug-related toxicities observed, albeit idiosyncratic, with these novel immunotherapeutics have led to the registration of multiple PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, in second-line advanced NSCLC, whereas durvalumab and avelumab are in late-phase clinical testing. Moreover, pembrolizumab has shown a survival advantage in the first-line setting; however, nivolumab failed to show a survival benefit possibly relating to patient selection based on PD-L1 expression. Current patient selection is based on PD-L1 expression, using the relevant companion diagnostic test, where patients with strong PD-L1 expression being more likely to respond to these novel agents. Ongoing clinical research focuses on the development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant NSCLC. There is also much interest in using these drugs as a therapeutic backbone for rational combinations with other treatment modalities including cytotoxic chemotherapies in the first-line NSCLC, other immunotherapies such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 antagonists, molecularly targeted agents including EGFR and ALK inhibitors, and radiotherapy. Concurrent treatment with radiotherapy is of particular interest owing to the potential for the abscopal effect, using radiotherapy to facilitate systemic treatment.     

Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies

Immune checkpoint antibodies that augment the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathway have demonstrated antitumor activity across multiple malignancies, and gained recent regulatory approval as single-agent therapy for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma and nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Knowledge of toxicities associated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, as well as effective management algorithms for these toxicities, is pivotal in order to optimize clinical efficacy and safety. In this article, we review selected published and presented clinical studies investigating single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and trials of combination approaches with other standard anticancer therapies, in multiple tumor types. We summarize the key adverse events reported in these studies and their management algorithms.     

Systemic Analysis and Review of Nivolumab-ipilimumab Combination as a Rescue Strategy for Renal Cell Carcinoma After Treatment With Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy

Nivolumab-ipilimumab has become the standard of care in the frontline setting for intermediate-/poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This regimen is associated with survival improvement but significant toxicity. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) monotherapy may provide response and offers a better safety profile. In this context, nivolumab-ipilimumab has been postulated as a rescue treatment after anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Recent retrospective data has shown positive results, and several nonrandomized clinical trials (NRCTs) have evaluated this strategy. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of available NRCTs to clarify the efficacy and safety of salvage nivolumab-ipilimumab in mRCC after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of salvage nivolumab-ipilimumab after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with mRCC. Only phase II NRCTs were available for the analysis. The pooled effect of single proportions with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the measure of effect (overall response rate [ORR] and incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events). Four studies accounting for 237 patients were included. All patients received prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The pooled ORR of salvage nivolumab-ipilimumab after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 failure was 10.0% (95% CI, 6%-14%; I² = 41%; P = .17). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 27.0% (95% CI, 20%-35%; I² = 0%; P = .56). The results of this analysis suggest that the use of salvage nivolumab-ipilimumab in mRCC after prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 has limited activity with a 10% ORR, and a non-negligible toxicity with 1 of 4 patients developing grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events.     

免疫检查点抑制剂在淋巴瘤中的研究进展

肿瘤细胞利用免疫检查点通路来逃避宿主免疫系统并抑制免疫细胞功能.癌细胞表达程序性细胞死亡蛋白配体1/2(programmed death-ligand 1/2,PD-L1/PD-L2)与细胞毒性 T 细胞上存在的程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1(programmed cell death protein-1,PD-1)结合,触发...     

Combination Therapy of Radiotherapy and Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment in Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Mini-review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are a standard pharmacologic therapy for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Substantial data have accumulated in recent years showing that radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy is more effective than monotherapy alone. Preclinical studies have shown that PD-L1 expression is upregulated on tumor cells after radiotherapy, resulting in the synergistically enhanced antitumor effect of irradiation and PD-L1 blockade. In the clinical setting, patients receiving radiotherapy before anti-PD-1 treatment have had a significantly better prognosis than those who have not undergone radiotherapy. In the present report, we reviewed previous studies of the combination of radiotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for NSCLC. In addition, we report our case of a patient whose PD-L1 expression gradually increased in brain metastases from NSCLC after repeated radiotherapy. In the perspectives portion, we focused on the questions of how to integrate radiotherapy into anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent regimens and described several ongoing clinical trials.     

How to make the best use of immunotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Antibodies that target programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand [programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] have become a mainstay of first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable genetic alterations. In this review, we summarize results from recent clinical trials that have evaluated the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab and the anti-PD-L1 antibodies atezolizumab and durvalumab as first-line treatment as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, other immunotherapies, and antiangiogenesis agents. We discuss factors that may influence treatment selection, including patient baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, tumor histology, and biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden. While immunotherapy has become a central component of first-line treatment of most patients with advanced NSCLC, important questions remain about how treatment should be managed for individual patients.     

Stromal PD-L1–Positive Regulatory T cells and PD-1–Positive CD8-Positive T cells Define the Response of Different Subsets of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Immunotherapy

Introduction

Inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) by using an immune checkpoint inhibitor has emerged as a promising immunotherapy for NSCLC. The correlation of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells with treatment outcomes has been reported in many pivotal trials; however, the relationship remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that those patients with both high density of PD-1–positive CD8 and PD-L1–positive CD4-positive CD25-positive (PD-1^hi PD-L1^hi) regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a better response to PD1/PD-L1 blockade.

PD-1/PD-L1信号通路在子宫内膜癌中的研究进展

子宫内膜癌作为女性生殖系统三大恶性肿瘤之一,早期治疗方法包括手术、放疗、化疗和内分泌治疗。晚期患者易发生转移或复发,预后较差。近年来靶向免疫检查点治疗成为肿瘤治疗的新热点,其中程序性死亡受体1/程序性死亡配体1(PD-1/PD-L1)在临床实验中显示出了较好的疗效和耐受性,本文将对PD-1/PD-L1信号通路相关的生物学基础,作用机制,其在子宫内膜癌及肿瘤微环境中表达及临床应用进行综述。     

Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibition is a new standard of targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and is represented in various combinations with and without chemotherapy in every therapy line within clinical trials. In advanced adenocarcinoma of GC, gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) and esophageal cancer (EC), the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy in first-line therapy improves overall survival (OS) in PD-L1 (programmed cell death protein 1)-positive patients with approval in Europe (PD-L1 CPS (combined positivity score) ≥ 5), USA and Taiwan (CHECKMATE-649) and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for GEJC and EC in Europe (CPS ≥ 10) and the USA (KEYNOTE-590). Furthermore, pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy show clear benefits in OS and are approved as first-line treatment of Her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2)-positive tumors in the USA (KEYNOTE-811). Nivolumab demonstrates superior OS regardless of PD-L1 expression in third-line therapy with approval in Japan (ATTRACTION-02) and pembrolizumab prolonged the duration of response in PD-L1 positive patients with approval in the USA in PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 patients (KEYNOTE-059). This review reflects the rationale and current results of phase II and III clinical trials investigating various immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-L1/1 and CTLA (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen)-4 in combination with and without chemotherapy and Her2-targeted therapy in GC.     

PD-L1 Expression of Lung Cancer Cells,Unlike Infiltrating Immune Cells,Is Stable and Unaffected by Therapy During Brain Metastasis

BackgroundApproximately 50% of brain metastases originate from non–small-cell lung cancer. The median survival of patients with brain metastases is 1 month without treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic strategies, such as those targeting the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) axis, are promising in patients with advanced systemic disease but are often preferentially administered to patients with tumors showing PD-L1 positivity.Patients and MethodsSurgically resected paired primary lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastasis samples of 61 patients were analyzed. We compared the paired samples regarding the amount of peritumoral and stromal mononuclear infiltration, PD-L1 expression of tumor and immune cells, and PD-1 expression of immune cells. We investigated the effect of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and steroid therapy on PD-L1 expression in brain metastases.ResultsThere was significant positive correlation regarding the PD-L1 expression of tumor cells between the paired primary lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastatic samples with the use of different cutoff levels (1%, 5%, 50%). We found no impact of chemotherapy or steroid therapy on the changes of PD-L1 expression of tumor cells between the 2 sites. There is no or only limited concordance of the proportion of PD-1– or PD-L1–positive tumor-associated immune cells between the paired tumor samples, which suggests that brain metastases develop their own immune environment.ConclusionWe observed a strong correlation of PD-L1 positive tumor cells between primary lung adenocarcinoma cases and their corresponding brain metastases, which is not significantly influenced by chemotherapy or steroid therapy.     

Correlation of PD-L1 Expression with Tumor Mutation Burden and Gene Signatures for Prognosis in Early-Stage Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma

Objectives

Anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy has demonstrated success in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Recently, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade also has demonstrated interesting results in small trials of neoadjuvant treatment in stage IB to IIIA NSCLC. In addition, several clinical trials using anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable stage NSCLC are ongoing. However, few analyses of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy–related biomarkers in early-stage squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCLC) have been reported. In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 protein expression, tumor mutation burden, and expression of an immune gene signature in early-stage SqCLC, providing data for identifying the potential role for patients with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 treatment in early-stage SqCLC.

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在前列腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展

前列腺癌（prostate cancer,PCa）发病率呈逐年上升趋势,前列腺癌免疫治疗已成为继外科、放疗、化疗之后的第四种治疗方法。作为当今肿瘤免疫治疗领域最具有研究前景的免疫检查点抑制剂中的程序性死亡受体-1（programmed cell death-1,PD-1）/程序性死亡配体-1（programmed cell death-ligand1,PD-L1）抑制剂,通过阻断PD-1与其配体PD-L1结合,从而终止T细胞的负性调控信号,使T细胞的活性恢复,进而逆转肿瘤免疫逃逸机制,恢复自身免疫应答,最后起到抑制和杀伤肿瘤的作用。本文就目前应用于前列腺癌临床试验的PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的现况和临床疗效研究进展进行综述。      

Combination Strategies on the Basis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

The era of immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies in the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is coming. Because of the lack of the definite biomarkers to select the optimal responders, only approximately 20% of patients with advanced NSCLC would respond to single checkpoint inhibitors-based immunotherapy. Moreover, primary or acquired resistance to conventional therapies is inevitable in most cases. Thus, combinations are pushed to move forward to be an alternative strategy and surely, it would be a future direction. Combination approaches on the basis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are currently designed to re-energize the immune system with complementary/synergetic mechanisms and could achieve durable antineoplastic effects in NSCLC. Herein, we highlight the potential combinations on the basis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in NSCLC, with other immunotherapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy in this current review.     

免疫检查点抑制剂一线治疗晚期NSCLC的现状与展望

随着程序性凋亡因子1受体(programmed death-1,PD-1)及其配体(PD-L1)抑制剂单药治疗在晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的二线和一线治疗中相继取得突破性进展,晚期NSCLC的诊治策略正在逐渐发生演变和优化.免疫联合治疗扩大受益人群、提高疗效,目前已经在一线治疗领域取得初步结果,有多项Ⅲ期随机对照研究正在进行中.本文将对免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期NSCLC一线治疗中的现状和前景进行综述.