Do older patients with stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer obtain survival benefits from surgery? A propensity score matching study using SEER data

BackgroundSurgical resection is the preferred treatment for Stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but one-third of patients still do not receive surgery, which might be due to the lack of robust and dedicated studies on the outcomes of surgical treatment in older patients with stage IB NSCLC. This study aims to investigate whether older patients with stage IB NSCLC benefit from surgery.MethodsData of patients with NSCLC were downloaded from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database classifications were converted from the 7th edition staging system to the 8th edition staging system, and older patients (aged ≥65 years at diagnosis) with stage IB NSCLC were included. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance the distribution proportions of clinical characteristics between the surgery and no surgery groups.ResultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching, the distribution proportions of clinical characteristics were balanced between the surgery and no surgery groups (all P > 0.05). The overall and disease-specific survival rates of patients in the surgery group were significantly higher than those of patients in the no-surgery group (both P < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that receiving surgery was a protective factor for overall survival and disease-specific survival of patients in all clinical character-related subgroups. Ultimately, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that sex, tumor size, tumor grade, and tumor classification were independent prognostic factors for overall and disease-specific survival in patients undergoing surgery.ConclusionsOlder patients with Stage IB NSCLC can benefit significantly from surgical treatment after eliminating confounding factors, which is expected to provide strong medical evidence for surgical treatment.     

Concurrent High PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Immune Cell Infiltration Predict PD-1 Blockade Efficacy in Advanced EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients

ObjectivesThe effectiveness of PD-1 blockade therapy in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. We investigated whether patient characteristics, PD-L1 expression, and immune cell (IC) status in the tumor microenvironment (TME) were associated with PD-1 blockade therapy outcomes.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with PD-1 blockade (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) between January 2016 and March 2018. The PD-L1 expression tumor proportion score (TPS) and types and distribution of ICs (CD8, PD-1, CD204, tumoral, and stromal) in the TME were analyzed.ResultsAmong 57 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade, 39 patients had sufficient tissues for analyzing the TME. The overall response rate (ORR) of PD-1 blockade was 12.3%. Only tumoral CD8 positive (CD8⁺) IC status was significantly associated with the response (median tumoral CD8⁺ICs: 299/mm² vs. 115/mm², P < .01). Among the 6 patients with concurrent high PD-L1 expression (TPS: ≥ 50%)/high tumoral CD8⁺ ICs (≥ 205/mm²), 5 (83.3%) showed a response and a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (PFS: 9.4M vs. 1.8M, P < .01). In contrast, none of the 7 patients with high PD-L1 expression/low tumoral CD8⁺ICs (<205/mm²) showed a response.ConclusionConcurrent high PD-L1 expression and high tumoral CD8⁺ ICs could predict the response and longer PFS of PD-1 blockade therapy in EGFR-mutant patients.     

Toxicity and time lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases

PurposeStereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the standard treatment for brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, mostly in combination with immunotherapy. The objective was to retrospectively evaluate the influence of the time-lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy on toxicity.Patients and methodsFrom 2016 to 2019, 59 patients treated with SRT for 103 brain metastases of NSCLC (60%) and melanoma (40%) in combination with concomitant immunotherapy (≤ 30 days) were included. The prescribed dose was 20 Gy/1f or 33 Gy/3f at the isocentre and 14 Gy or 23.1 Gy (70%) respectively at the PTV envelope (PTV = GTV + 2 mm). The mean tumour diameter was 14 mm (4–52 mm). The immunotherapies used were anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. The 103 metastases were classified into 3 groups according to the time-lapse between instatement of immunotherapy and instatement of SRT for the patient concerned: 7 (7%) in group A (≤ 7 days), 38 (37%) in group B (7 to 14 days) and 58 (56%) in group C (14 to 30 days).ResultsThe mean follow-up was 10.1 months. The median overall survival was 11.5 months for NSCLC and 12.5 months for melanoma. The percentage of local control (LC) at one year was 65.1% (93.6% for NSCLC and 26.5% for melanoma). The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of LC (P = 0.86), while the histology was (P < 0.001). The proportion of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 5.1%, and that of radionecrosis was 9.7% (among these patients, 80% were non-symptomatic): 0%, 13.1% and 8.6% for groups A, B and C respectively. The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of toxicity. Only tumour volume was a significant predictive factor (P = 0.03).ConclusionThe time lapse between immunotherapy and SRT does not influence brain toxicity. The tumour volume remains the main factor.     

An Exploration of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy and in Combination With Bevacizumab or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study

BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) has achieved modest efficacy in the late-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and drug toxicities of TAS-102 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical setting.MethodsFrom October 2020 to February 2022, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed from 2 or more lines of prior therapy and treated with TAS-102 monotherapy, in combination with bevacizumab or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were analyzed. The evaluation indicators were progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate , disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.ResultsA total of 70 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate and DCR were 1.4% and 68.6%. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI: 4.1-7.9) and 10.0 (95% CI: 8.3-11.7) months. Compared with TAS-102 monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab obtained superior DCR (75.9% vs. 50% vs. 40%, P = .047), PFS (6.3m vs. 3.0 m vs. 3.0 m, P = .041) and OS (12.0 m vs. 6.5 m vs. 6.0m, P = .013). Patients without prior regorafenib or fruquintinib therapy obtained better median PFS (6.3 vs. 4.3 m, P = .031) and OS (NR vs. 9.0 m, P = .036). Other indicators, including age, tumor site, KRAS status and use of fluoropyrimidine as last regimen before TAS-102, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.ConclusionIn real-world clinical setting, TAS-102 showed consistent clinical efficacy and manageable safety with previous prospective clinical studies. Compared with monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated better clinical efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer.     

B cell and B cell-related pathways for novel cancer treatments

B cells are recognized as the main effector cells of humoral immunity which suppress tumor progression by secreting immunoglobulins, promoting T cell response, and killing cancer cells directly. Given these properties, their anti-tumor immune response in the tumor micro-environment (TME) is of great interest. Although T cell-related immune responses have become a therapeutic target with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, not all patients benefit from these treatments. B cell and B cell-related pathways (CCL19, −21/CCR7 axis and CXCL13/CXCR5 axis) play key roles in activating immune response through humoral immunity and local immune activation via tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) formation. However they have some protumorigenic works in the TME. Thus, a better understanding of B cell and B cell-related pathways is necessary to develop effective cancer control. In this review, we summarize recent evidences regarding the roles of B cell and B cell-related pathways in the TME and immune response and discuss their potential roles for novel cancer treatment strategies.     

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the survival outcomes of patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PurposeTo determine the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary surgery on survival outcomes for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using an approach based on a meta-analysis.MethodsThe PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane library, and CNKI databases were systematically browsed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which met a set of predetermined inclusion criteria throughout January 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) were applied for the pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) values, and the pooled survival rates at 1-year and 3-year were used as the relative risk (RR). All the pooled effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.ResultsNineteen RCTs contained a total of 4372 NSCLC at I-III stages was selected for final meta-analysis. We noted NACT was significantly associated with an improvement in OS (HR: 0.87; 95%CI: 0.81–0.94; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.78–0.96; P = 0.005). Moreover, the survival rate at 1-year (RR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; P = 0.007) and 3-year (RR: 1.16; 95%CI: 1.06–1.27; P = 0.001) in the NACT group was significantly higher than the survival rate for the primary surgery group. Finally, the treatment effects of NACT versus primary surgery on survival outcomes might be different when stratified by the mean age of patients and the tumor stages.ConclusionsNACT could improve survival outcomes for patients with resectable NSCLC, suggesting its suitable future applicability for clinical practice. However, large-scale RCT should be conducted to assess the chemotherapy regimen on the prognosis of resectable NSCLC.     

Independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in 2623 patients with Non–Small cell lung cancer

Purposethis study attempts to identify the independent risk factors that can predict lymph node metastasis for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and guide doctor adoption of individualized treatment for such patients.Materials and methodsThis study was approved by the Hospital's Ethics Committee and all patients had signed informed consent forms. We retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients who had undergone surgical resection from December 2008 to December 2013.The statistical significance of evaluation variables and lymph node metastasis was determined with Pearson's Chi-square test. The risk factors of lymph node metastasis were determined through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. And for the age and tumor diameter factors, optimal cutoff points were determined with a receiver operating characteristic analysis.ResultsIn the present study, a total of 2623 patients were included in the study, and 779 patients with lymph node metastasis. Three independent risk factors were identified: age, tumor diameter and Ki-67 index. We found that <65 years of age (Adjusted-OR:1.921), ≥2.85 cm of tumor diameter (Adjusted-OR:3.141), and 5%~25% in Ki-67 group (Adjusted-OR:2.137),≥25% (Adjusted-OR:3.341) were significant. Also we found that 307 patients with lymph node metastasis and the lymph node metastasis rate was 51.0%, when the age<65 years, Ki-67 index≥25%, and the tumor diameter≥2.85 cm. On the contrary, there were only 2 patients with lymph node metastasis, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was 5.1%.ConclusionIdentifying three independent risk factors that predict lymph node metastasis in non-small cell patients, Among NSCLC patients in whom all three predictors were identified, and over a half of the patients showed lymph node metastasis.     

Prognostic factors in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer – A systematic review

AimOligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) is a disease-entity with potential for long-term remission in selected patients. Those with truly limited metastatic load (rather than occult widespread metastatic disease) may benefit from multimodality treatment including local ablative therapy of distant metastases. In this systematic review, we studied factors associated with long-term survival in patients with OMBC.MethodsEligible studies included patients with OMBC who received a combination of local and systemic therapy as multimodal approach and reported overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), or both. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the quality of each included study. Independent prognostic factors for OS and/or PFS are summarized.ResultsOf 1271 screened abstracts, 317 papers were full-text screened and twenty studies were included. Eleven of twenty studies were classified as acceptable quality. Definition of OMBC varied between studies and mostly incorporated the number and/or location of metastases. The 5-year OS ranged between 30 and 79% and 5-year PFS ranged between 25 and 57%. Twelve studies evaluated prognostic factors for OS and/or PFS in multivariable models. A solitary metastasis, >24 months interval between primary tumor and OMBC, no or limited involved axillary lymph nodes at primary diagnosis, and hormone-receptor positivity were associated with better outcome. HER2-positivity was associated with worse outcome, but only few patients received anti-HER2 therapy.ConclusionsOMBC patients with a solitary distant metastasis and >24 months disease-free interval have the best OS and may be optimal candidates to consider a multidisciplinary approach.     

Preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and clinical outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases

PurposeAccumulating evidence suggests that the inflammatory tumor microenvironment can potentiate tumor progression and metastasis. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel inflammation-based prognostic score. This study was performed to examine the associations of the preoperative CAR with clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after curative resection.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed the preoperative CAR in 184 patients who underwent curative resection for CRLM from November 2001 to January 2018 at Kumamoto University (Kumamoto, Japan). The optimal cutoff level of the preoperative CAR was determined by survival classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. We compared clinicopathological factors and prognoses between the high-CAR and low-CAR groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs), controlling for potential confounders.ResultsA higher preoperative CAR was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.003). Applying survival CART analysis, the high-CAR group comprised 33 patients (17.9%). In the multivariate analyses, a high CAR was independently associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.63–4.72; p = 0.0004) and RFS (HR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.49; p = 0.040). A high CAR was associated with a large tumor size, high serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, high intraoperative blood loss, and more postoperative complications.ConclusionA high preoperative CAR is associated with shorter OS and RFS and might serve as a prognostic marker for patients with CRLM after curative resection.     

Management of Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in an Evolving Treatment Landscape: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives of First-Line Therapies

IntroductionThe treatment landscape in locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has evolved with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first line (1L) and platinum-refractory settings and with the recent approval of avelumab as 1L maintenance therapy for patients achieving disease control with platinum-containing regimens. Oncology provider perspectives and decision-making processes regarding aUC management, especially with the integration of recently approved strategies, such as maintenance therapy, have not been well-described.Patients and MethodsQualitative interview study with US oncologists and oncology nurses in academic and community settings in August 2020. Interviews explored decision-making around aUC 1L treatment eligibility determinants and selection, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing practices, and use of maintenance therapy. Thematic analysis was used to identify drivers of 1L treatment decisions.ResultsEighteen oncologists (women, 11%; >15 years in practice, 55%; academic, 39%) and 18 oncology nurses (women, 94%; >15 years in practice, 34%; academic, 50%) participated. Providers preferred platinum-based regimens in 1L setting and reserved 1L ICI monotherapy for frail patients. Providers preferred chemotherapy followed by switch maintenance ICI, as opposed to concurrent combination chemotherapy and ICI, followed by ICI as continuation maintenance. Decision-making was driven by need to adhere to treatment decision-making guidelines, characteristics of the patient, treatment efficacy and patient preference.ConclusionProviders adhered to guidelines and level I evidence in decision-making in the aUC 1L setting. Future studies should further evaluate barriers to the adoption of standard-of-care strategies and factors impacting decision-making in the real-world setting.     

Direct surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases

IntroductionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, but there is little scientific evidence for this approach. This study aimed to study survival in patients treated with direct surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), i.e. without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Material and methodsPatients with histopathologically confirmed peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer that underwent first-time CRS-HIPEC with complete cytoreduction (CC0 or 1) at Karolinska University Hospital 2012–2019 were included. Patients with synchronous extraperitoneal metastases were excluded if not treated before end of follow-up. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. The multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, synchronous/metachronous peritoneal metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), extraperitoneal metastases and the pathological tumor (T) and lymph node (N) stage of the primary tumor.ResultsIn all, 131 patients underwent complete CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median OS and DFS were 40.3 months and 12.5 months, respectively, in patients treated with direct surgery. In the multivariable model, PCI≥16 was the only variable associated with decreased OS, whereas elevated PCI, metachronous development of peritoneal metastases and synchronous extraperitoneal metastases were associated with decreased DFS. Age was not associated with an impaired prognosis.ConclusionPatients who underwent direct surgery with CRS-HIPEC had a good prognosis, with a median OS of more than 3 years. The results from this study question the need of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all patients eligible for CRS-HIPEC.     

The Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R): Real-World Data on Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Curative Chemoradiation

IntroductionChemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care in inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, favoring concurrent (cCRT) over sequential CRT (seqCRT), with adjuvant immunotherapy in responders. Elderly and frail NSCLC patients have generally been excluded from trials in the past. In elderly patients however, the higher treatment related morbidity of cCRT, may outweigh the possible lower tumor control of seqCRT. For elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC real-world data is essential to be able to balance treatment toxicity and treatment outcome. The aim of this study is to analyze acute toxicity and 3-month mortality of curative chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC and to analyze whether cCRT for elderly stage III NSCLC patients is safe.MethodsThe Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R) is a national lung cancer audit that started in 2013 for patients treated with curative intent radiotherapy. All Dutch patients treated for stage III NSCLC between 2015 and 2018 with seqCRT or cCRT for (primary or recurrent) stage III lung cancer are included in this population-based study. Information was collected on patient, tumor- and treatment characteristics and the incidence and severity of acute non-hematological toxicity (CTCAE-4 version 4.03) and mortality within 3 months after the end of radiotherapy. To evaluate the association between prognostic factors and outcome (acute toxicity and mortality within 3 months), an univariable and multivariable analysis was performed. The definition of cCRT was:radiotherapy started within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy.ResultsOut of all 20 Dutch departments of radiation oncology, 19 centers participated in the registry. A total of 2942 NSCLC stage III patients were treated with CRT. Of these 67.2% (n = 1977) were treated with cCRT (median age 66 years) and 32.8% (n = 965) were treated with seqCRT (median age 69 years). Good performance status (WHO 0-1) was scored in 88.6% for patients treated with cCRT and in 71.0% in the patients treated with seqCRT. Acute nonhematological 3-month toxicity (CTCAE grade ≥3 or radiation pneumonitis grade ≥2) was scored in 21.9% of the patients treated with cCRT and in 17.7% of the patients treated with seqCRT. The univariable analysis for acute toxicity showed significantly increased toxicity for cCRT (P = .008), WHO ≥2 (P = .006), and TNM IIIC (P = .031). The multivariable analysis for acute toxicity was significant for cCRT (P = .015), WHO ≥2 (P = .001) and TNM IIIC (P = .016). The univariable analysis for 3-month mortality showed significance for seqCRT (P = .025), WHO ≥2 (P < .001), higher cumulative radiotherapy dose (P < .001), higher gross tumor volume total (P = .020) and male patients (p < .001). None of these variables reached significance in the multivariable analysis for 3-month mortality.ConclusionIn this national lung cancer audit of inoperable NSCLC patients, 3-month toxicity was significantly higher in patients treated with cCRT (21.9% vs. 17.7% for seqCRT) higher TNM stage IIIC, and poor performance (WHO≥2) patients.The 3-months mortality was not significantly different for tested parameters. Age was not a risk factor for acute toxicity, nor 3 months mortality.     

Hemangiosis carcinomatosa as an independent risk factor for long-term survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients

ObjectivesRecent studies have shown that blood vessel invasion (V1) influences the long-term survival of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to emphasize V1 as an independent risk factor. We evaluated the effects of V1 on the survival of NSCLC patients with UICC stages I, II, and III after surgery.MethodsThis retrospective study includes 747 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent anatomic resection and radical lymphadenectomy at our institution between January 2012 and December 2020. V1- were compared to V0-patients (no blood vessel invasion). All patients received adjuvant therapy according to European guidelines when indicated. After excluding patients with detection of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, tumor-cells at the resection margin, distant metastases and those, that received neoadjuvant therapy, 1-, 3- and 5- year survival rates were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. To proof V1 as an independent risk factor, a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed regarding age, gender, UICC-stage, lymph-node involvement, and comorbidities.ResultsA total of 461 patients (V0: 440; V1: 21) were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics did not show any significant difference. Mean age in V0-group was 65.7 ± 10.5 years and 64.1 ± 8.6 years in V1-group (p-value = 0.5). In the V0-group 54.8% were male, whereas in the V1-group this number was 66.7% (p-value = 0.37). Mean survival in V1-group was significantly shorter compared to V0-group (V1: 45.8 ± 9.3 months; V0: 81.1 ± 1.1 months; p-value<0.001). This was confirmed after applying a propensity score matched analysis (V0: 99.9 ± 4.9 months; V1: 45.8 ± 9.3 months; p-value<0.001) - V1 is a prognostic marker independent of UICC stage. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were significantly shorter for V1-patients (1-year: V0: 100%; V1: 70.6%; p-value = 0.012) (3-year: V0: 95.2%; V1: 46.2%; p-value = 0.002) (5-year: V0: 90.5%; V1: 36.4%; p-value = 0.003).ConclusionAs we have shown with our investigations, V1 has a major impact on long-term survival in NSCLC patients and furthermore, acts as an independent risk factor. Due to our small but specified sample size, our statement should be confirmed by a multicenter study. In the meantime, we suggest making the implementation of the V0/V1 specification mandatory in the tumor classification.     

Adequate Number of Lymph Nodes Sampled May Determine Appropriate Surgical Modality for Early-Stage NSCLC: A Population-Based Real-World Study

BackgroundThe standard surgical procedure for ≤ 2 cm non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including the number of lymph nodes sampled (nLN) and surgical modality, remains controversial. This study was designed to determine the optimal cohort in which sublobectomy could be an alternative to lobectomy.Materials (or Patients) and MethodsPatients from 1998 to 2017 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The optimal cutoff value of nLN was identified using a restrictive cubic spline graph (RCS). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to determine cancer-specific survival (CSS). The COX proportional hazard regression model was used to identify the influence of clinical and demographic variables on survival, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance differences in baseline characteristics. Finally, we used an external cohort from a single-center medical institution to verify the conclusions drawn from the SEER database.ResultsA total of 6150 patients were included. The sublobectomy subgroup included segmentectomy (308, 5.0%) and wedge resection (1611, 26.2%). The cutoff value for nLN was 7. In the nLN ≥7 subgroup of the PSM cohort, the CSS of segmentectomy and wedge resection was close to that of the lobectomy subgroup (P = .12), whereas in the nLN <7 subgroup, the CSS of the lobectomy subgroup was significantly higher than that of the sublobectomy with P < .001). Surgical methods, nLN, age, sex, and differentiated grade were independent predictors of CSS. External cohort validation: A total of 1106 patients from the Affiliated Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between 2013 and 2020 were included. The grouping criteria were consistent with the SEER database. In the nLN≥7 subgroup, sublobectomy had a survival outcome similar to that of lobectomy (P = .81).ConclusionSublobectomy and nLN < 7 were strongly associated with poorer CSS for early-stage NSCLC. On the premise of nLN ≥ 7, sublobectomy could provide similar survival outcomes to lobectomy for these patients.     

Association of the Time to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Initiation and Outcomes With Second Line ICI in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

BackgroundEarly progression on first-line (1L) platinum-based therapy or between therapy lines may be a surrogate of more aggressive disease and poor outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but its prognostic role regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and survival is unclear. We hypothesized that shorter time until start of second-line (2L) ICI would be associated with worse outcomes in aUC.Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study in patients with aUC treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, who received 2L ICI. Patients receiving switch maintenance ICI were excluded. We defined time to 2L ICI therapy as the time between the start of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy to the start of 2L ICI and categorized patients a priori into 1 of 3 groups: less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months. We calculated overall response rate (ORR) with 2L ICI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the start of 2L ICI. ORR was compared among the 3 groups using multivariable logistic regression, and PFS, OS using cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors.ResultsWe included 215, 215, and 219 patients in the ORR, PFS, and OS analyses, respectively, after exclusions. ORR difference did not reach statistical significance between patients with less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months to 2L ICI. However, PFS (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and OS (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.10-2.84) was shorter among those with time to 2L ICI less than 3 months compared to those who initiated 2L ICI more than 6 months.ConclusionAmong patients with aUC treated with 2L ICI, time to 2L ICI less than 3 months was associated with lower, but not significantly different ORR, but shorter PFS and OS compared to 2L ICI more than 6 months. This highlights potential cross resistance mechanisms between ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy.     

Should an elective contralateral neck dissection be performed in midline-reaching squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx?

Objectiveto compare the rate of occult contralateral neck metastases (OCNM) in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) reaching or crossing the midline and to identify risk factors for OCNM.Materials and methodswe conducted a single-center retrospective study of oral and oropharyngeal SCC with contralateral cN0 neck. The cohort was divided into a midline-reaching (MR; approaching the midline from up to 10 mm) group and a midline-crossing (MC; exceeding the midline by up to 10 mm) group. Clinical N-status was assessed by a radiologist specializing in head and neck imaging. All patients underwent contralateral elective neck dissection (END).ResultsA total of 98 patients were included in this study, 59 in the MR group and 39 in the MC group. OCNM were present in 17.3% of patients, 20.3% in the MR group and 12.8% in the MC group (p = 0.336). In multivariable analysis, MR/MC status as well as distance from the midline (in mm) were not identified as risk factors for OCNM. Conversely, oropharyngeal primary and clinical N-status above N1 were significantly associated with a higher risk of OCNM, with odds ratios (OR) of 3.98 (95% CI = 1.08–14.60; p = 0.037) and 3.41 (95% CI = 1.07–10.85; p = 0.038) respectively.Conclusionin patients with oral and oropharyngeal SCC extending close to or beyond the midline, tumor origin and clinical N-status should carry the most weight when dictating the indications for contralateral END, rather than the midline involvement in itself.     

Predictors of lung recurrence and disease-specific mortality after pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcoma

BackgroundWe identified prognostic factors in a 30-year series of STS treated at a single Institution, using an advanced statistical approach.MethodsFrom June 1988 to July 2019, 164 patients were referred to Rizzoli Orthopedic Hospital, Bologna, Italy) for STS lung metastasectomy (LMTS). The endpoints were lung metastasis recurrence (LMR) and lung metastasis-specific mortality (LMSM).The analysis included directed acyclic graphs, cubic splines, and a competing risk model in order to minimize bias.ResultsThe 10- and 15- year LMR cumulative incidence were 0.77 (0.76–0.78) whereas 10- and 15- year freedom from LMSM were 0.60 [0.51–0.70] and 0.56 [0.47–0.67], respectively. The malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) histotype (SHR 4.12 [2.05–8.27]), a disease-free interval (DFI) up to 68 months (HR from 2 [1.7–2.2] to 1.5 [1.1–1.9]) and a LM size ≥4 mm (3.1 [2.1–4.4]) predicted LMR.Myxofibrosarcoma (HR 2.52[1.64–3.86]), synovial sarcoma (2.53[1.22–5.23]), adjuvant chemotherapy (2.01[1.11–3.61]), DFI between 2 months and 20 months (HR from 1.5 [1.1–2.3] to 1.3 [1.1–1.7] and primary tumor size a primary tumor size comprised between 3.6 cm and 10 cm predicted LMSM. A sharp increase in LMSM was observed with a tumor size from ≥20 cm.ConclusionsOur analysis corrected by potential confounders allowed us to identify specific histotypes and DFI intervals as predictors of both LMR and LMSM. Tumor size adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affected LM-related survival. Our findings need to be confirmed by larger randomized studies.     

The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT in stage IIB/C melanoma patients prior to SLNB

BackgroundStage IIB/IIC (8th AJCC) melanoma patients are known to have high-risk primary tumors, however they follow the same routine to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as more low risk tumors. Guidelines are not conclusive regarding the use of preoperative imaging for these patients. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the value of ultrasound (US) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT prior to lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) and SLNB for stage IIB/C melanoma patients.MethodsFrom 2019-04 till 2020–01, all stage IIB/C melanoma patients underwent US of the regional lymph nodes and whole body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before their planned LSG and SLNB. Suspected metastases were confirmed with fine needle aspiration (FNA), prior to surgery.ResultsIn total 23 patients were screened: six had metastases detected by imaging, two by US, one by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and three were detected by both imaging modalities. All metastases were nodal and therefore treatment was altered to lymph node dissection and all but one also received adjuvant therapy. Eight (47%) of the 17 patients without macroscopic disease, still had a positive SN. Sensitivity, specificity and false negative rate for US and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were 36%, 89%, 64% and 29%, 100% and 71%, respectively.ConclusionPreoperative negative imaging does not exclude the presence of SN metastases, therefore SLNB cannot be foregone. However, US detected metastases in 22% of patients, altering their treatment, which suggests it is effective in the work-up of stage IIB/C melanoma. Staging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is not of added value prior to LSG and SLNB and should therefore not be used.     

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in Medullary thyroid carcinoma: A multi-center study

IntroductionThe lymph node ratio (LNR), which represents the proportion of metastatic lymph nodes resected, has been found to be a prognostic variable in several cancers, but data for Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) are sparse. The aim of this study was to determine the value of the LNR in predicting outcome in patients with MTC.Materials and methodsA retrospective multicenter study design of 107 patients with MTC who underwent total thyroidectomy with neck dissection between 1984 and 2016. The association of LNR with patient and tumor characteristics and prognostic factors was evaluated.ResultsStudy population consisted of 53.3% female, mean age at diagnosis was 50.3 ± 18.4 years; 16.8% had inherited MTC. LNR was positively correlated with tumor size (p = 0.018) and inversely correlated with age at diagnosis (p = 0.024). A higher LNR was associated with extrathyroidal extension (p < 0.001), multifocality (p = 0.001), bilateral tumor (p = 0.002), distant metastases (p < 0.001), and tumor recurrence (OR = 14.7, p < 0.001). LNR was also correlated to postoperative calcitonin levels (p < 0.001) and carcinoembryonic antigen (p = 0.011). LNR >0.1 was associated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients at risk: tumor larger than 20 mm at diagnosis (p = 0.013), sporadic MTC (p = 0.01), and age above 40 years at diagnosis (p = 0.004). Cox multivariate survival analysis revealed LNR as the only significant independent factor for disease free survival (p = 0.005).ConclusionsThis study showed that LNR correlates well with patient and tumor characteristics and prognostic variables. We suggest that LNR should be considered an important parameter for predicting outcome in MTC.     

Systemic Chemotherapy With or Without Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Liver Metastases From Pancreatic Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BackgroundThe significance of systemic chemotherapy (SCT) combined with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with liver metastases (PACLM) remains unclear. Based on previous studies, this single-center propensity score matching (PSM) study aimed to explore the efficacy of SCT with or without HAI for PACLM.Patient and MethodsThe PSM method was used to screen 661 cases of PACLM who received SCT at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from 2001 to 2020. According to the 1:6 ratio with PSM, 385 patients were divided into the SCT+HAI group (n = 55) and the SCT group (n = 330). After a median follow-up of 49 (range 7-153) months, overall survival (OS) and survival-related prognostic factors were analyzed.ResultsThe main baseline characteristics of the SCT+HAI group and the SCT alone group were matched appropriately (P > .05). After PSM, the median OS for patients in the 2 groups was 10.6 and 7.6 months, respectively (P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed that peritoneal metastases (P = .03), CA199 ≥ 500U/mL (P = .03), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 250U/L (P = .03) were prognostic factors of poor survival, modern SCT plus HAI (P = .04) was a protective factor.ConclusionOur findings indicated that adequate cycles of SCT+HAI result in better survival than SCT alone in patients with PACLM. Patients with peritoneal metastases, markedly elevated CA19-9 and LDH have a poorer prognosis. The conclusion has yet to be validated in randomized controlled clinical trials.