Development of treatment strategies in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (take home messages)

In the last decade combined modality treatment approaches contributed to the progress of therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. With this management strategies younger patients (<70 years) with locally advanced disease and a good performance status (ECOG 0,1) have survival benefits compared to sole locoregional treatment. Further development of these treatment concepts is warranted. To adopt optimal tailored therapy to prognostic consistent patient groups exact staging of disease is mandatory. Moreover, refinements of the staging system would be helpful to identify in defined anatomical stages, patient subgroups who will benefit from systemic treatment options different from chemotherapy (i.e. tyrosine kinase-inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor family, anti-angiogenic treatment). The current status of developing treatment strategies in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is discussed.     

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): from bench to bedside

Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. For patients with early resectable disease, surgical resection or transplantation is considered a potentially curative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); on the other hand, for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, treatment is essentially palliative and prior to the approval of sorafenib, there was no globally approved systemic treatment for patients presenting with unresectable or metastatic HCC. Sorafenib is the only systemic treatment to demonstrate a statistically significant but modest overall survival benefit in a large phase III trial. Thus, novel systemic approaches represent a high unmet medical need in advanced HCC. In this review article, we will try to take a journey through the history of systemic therapeutic options for HCC passing through the current standard options and exploring the potential new systemic options for this disease.     

Contrasting Some Differences in Managing Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between the East and the West

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide, although its aetiologies vary significantly between the East and the West. About a half of HCC cases present with advanced unresectable HCC at the time of diagnosis, leading to a worse prognosis. Over the past 20 years, the treatment paradigm for advanced unresectable HCC has shifted from an entirely palliative approach to a multidisciplinary treatment, with continuous reassessment and possible repeat treatment attributed to the advent of novel and improved local, regional and systemic therapeutic options, contributed by both the East and the West. An individualised treatment plan should be determined for each patient, as there can be substantial differences in the decision-making and treatment response to the same treatment for different patients and different patient populations. This review provides a summary of the recent advances in management and compares Eastern and Western strategies for HCC.     

Indonesian consensus on systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly cancer with a rising incidence in the last 20 years. Most patients are diagnosed late when curative treatment is no longer feasible. With the background of chronic liver disease in most patients, the management of HCC becomes more complicated, in which well-preserved liver function is a prerequisite for locoregional or systemic therapies. In 2008, sorafenib became the first systemic agent proven to provide survival benefit for patients with advanced-stage HCC. For nearly a decade, no treatment has succeeded in providing better results than sorafenib. However, numerous advances in systemic therapies have emerged in the last 5 years to fulfill the unmet needs of effective therapeutic options. Several agents have been approved for clinical use after positive results in phase III clinical trials, including lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and lastly immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor. With various options available, knowledge on the clinical evidence of each drug, their safety profile, as well as the patient characteristics and preferences become mandatory in clinical decision making. The objective of this consensus is to help clinicians, health-care workers, and policy makers in providing best clinical care for HCC patients.     

Early diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: From bench to bedside

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The prognosis of patients with HCC remains poor largely due to the late diagnosis and lack of effective treatments. Despite being widely used, alpha-fetoprotein serology and ultrasonography have limited diagnostic performance for early-stage HCC. The emergence of omics strategies has contributed to significant advances in the development of non-invasive biomarkers for the early diagnosis of HCC including proteins, metabolites, circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, and circulating non-coding ribonucleic acid. Early diagnosis is beneficial to patients as it increases the proportion who can be treated with curative treatment, thus prolonging survival outcomes. Currently, multiple clinical trials involving locoregional, systemic therapies, and combinations of these modalities are changing therapeutic strategies for different stage HCC. Success in several preclinical trials that involve immunotherapeutic innovations has created the potential to complement and enforce other treatment strategies in the future. This review summarizes the most recent advances in non-invasive early molecular detection, current therapy strategies, and potential immunotherapeutic innovations of HCC.     

Technology insight: Image-guided therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma--intra-arterial and ablative techniques

Locoregional techniques have become the mainstay of therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Such image-guided interventions include catheter-based approaches (transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 radiotherapy) and locoregional ablative techniques, either chemical (percutaneous ethanol injection), or thermal (radiofrequency ablation, laser ablation, microwave ablation and cryoablation). These therapies are mainly utilized for palliation, but have also been used with curative intent. In selected cases, percutaneous interventional treatments have shown good results (5-year survival 40-50%), but, even when chosen as first-line treatment, have not been able to achieve the response rates and outcomes achieved by surgical options (resection or transplantation). New promising image-guided therapies are continuously emerging, as we attempt to improve tumor targeting, minimize hepatic toxicity and ultimately improve quality of life and survival of patients with HCC. With new technologies in imaging and drug delivery becoming available, it is likely that, in the future, patients with HCC will be best treated by a multidisciplinary team approach, utilizing a combination of techniques to improve patient survival. This review outlines the current status of the most commonly used image-guided locoregional interventions in the treatment of patients with HCC, and describes recent research and advances related to image-guided interventions for liver cancer.     

Treatment of intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the clinic: how can outcomes be improved?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex condition associated with a poor prognosis. Treatment outcomes are affected by multiple variables, including liver function, performance status of the patient, and tumor stage, making a multidisciplinary approach to treatment essential for optimal patient management. Only ～30% of patients are eligible for curative therapies (surgery or ablation); palliative treatments include transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib. Treatment choice is guided by staging systems and treatment guidelines, although numerous systems exist and treatment guidelines vary by region. The current standard of care for patients unsuitable for potentially curative therapy is locoregional therapy with TACE. This treatment is associated with survival benefits, but there is no consensus regarding the optimum treatment/retreatment strategy. For patients with more advanced disease or who have failed locoregional therapy, sorafenib is the standard of care. Sorafenib is a targeted agent with proven survival benefits as monotherapy in these patients, and ongoing studies will clarify its role in combination with other agents and in patients with impaired liver function. Although other novel agents and therapeutic approaches are emerging, such as radioembolization and various targeted agents, further suitably designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing these agents with the standard of care are needed. In addition to RCTs, the collection of real-life data will also be important to allow physicians to make fully informed treatment decisions. The Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib (GIDEON) study is a global, noninterventional study of patients with unresectable HCC receiving sorafenib. The aim of that study is to compile a large robust database to evaluate local, regional, and global factors influencing the management of patients with HCC. It is hoped that findings from the GIDEON study along with phase III RCT data will lead to better outcomes for patients with intermediate-advanced HCC.     

Systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular cancer: new hope on the horizon

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the world. The majority of the patients present at an advanced or incurable stage where neither locoregional treatment nor combination treatment of locoregional treatment and systemic therapies is feasible. For decades sorafenib was the only treatment option available for advanced HCC. However, with the advent of new and more effective therapies recently, the overall prognosis of advanced HCC has improved significantly.

Areas covered: This review summarises the current systemic treatment options available and future prospects in the management of advanced HCC where patients are not suitable for locoregional treatment.

Expert opinion: New effective targeted therapeutics have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for advanced HCC. The incorporation of sequential therapy including sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line treatment and immunotherapy, regorafenib or cabozantinib as second-line treatment have significantly improved outcomes for patients with advanced HCC. Further development of novel combinations of these new agents and predictive/prognostic biomarkers are being explored. Efforts should also be made to tailor treatment to individual patients based on etiology, clinical and molecular factors.     

Novel molecular targets in hepatocellular carcinoma

Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer and cancer-related deaths. The therapeutic efficacy of locoregional and systemic treatment in patients with advanced HCC remains low, which results in a poor prognosis. The development of sorafenib for the treatment of HCC has resulted in a new era of molecular targeted therapy for this disease. However, the median overall survival was reported to be barely higher in the sorafenib treatment group than in the control group. Hence, in this review we describe the importance of developing more effective targeted therapies for the management of advanced HCC. Recent investigations of molecular signaling pathways in several cancers have provided some insights into developing molecular therapies that target critical members of these signaling pathways. Proteins involved in the Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways, Polo-like kinase 1, arginine, histone deacetylases and Glypican-3 can be potential targets in the treatment of HCC. Monotherapy has limited therapeutic efficacy due to the development of inhibitory feedback mechanisms and induction of chemoresistance. Thus, emphasis is now on the development of personalized and combination molecular targeted therapies that can serve as ideal therapeutic strategies for improved management of HCC.     

From molecular biology to targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: the future is now

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized as a highly chemoresistant cancer with no effective systemic therapy. Despite surgical or locoregional therapies, prognosis remains poor because of high tumor recurrence or tumor progression, and currently there are no well-established effective adjuvant therapies. The molecular biology of carcinogenesis and tumor progression of HCC has been increasingly understood with intense research in recent years. Several important intracellular signaling pathways such as the Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk pathway and PI3k/Akt/mTOR pathway have been recognized, and the role of several growth factors and angiogenic factors such as EGF and VEGF has been confirmed. Effective agents targeting these molecular abnormalities have been developed and widely tested in preclinical studies of HCC cell lines or xenograft models. Several agents have entered clinical trials in HCC patients, and recent data indicated that a multikinase inhibitor targeting Ras kinase and VEGFR-2, sorafenib, is effective in prolonging survival of patients with advanced HCC. The management of advanced HCC is entering the era of molecular targeting therapy, which is of particular significance for HCC in view of the lack of existing effective systemic therapy for this cancer.     

Long-term survival after radical operations for cancer treatment-induced sarcomas: how two survivors invite reflection on oncologic treatment concepts

Extent and radicality of surgical oncologic treatment has changed in the past 30 years. Two patients with node-positive breast cancer are presented, who underwent (total or radical) mastectomy with lymphadenectomy and postoperative radiation 24 and 40 years ago. A radiation-associated sarcoma of the parascapular soft tissue developed in one patient 9 years after treatment; the other one sought treatment for a lymphedema-associated Stewart-Treves lymphangiosarcoma 16 years after initial therapy. Both patients underwent a forequarter amputation for their treatment-associated high-grade sarcoma. Both are currently alive and cancer-free 15 and 24 years after amputation. These reports remind us that radical locoregional treatment can cure some solid cancers in the absence of systemic therapy; that such extensive treatment may induce significant disability or secondary malignancies long-term; that even advanced treatment-associated sarcomas can be cured with aggressive resection; that today's multimodality therapy approaches and appropriate patient selection have rendered such extensive locoregional treatment for many tumors obsolete or unnecessary; and that if no effective alternative treatment exists and organ or limb preservation is not feasible, an aggressive resection approach for high-grade cancer should not be discounted unless systemic failure is certain or imminent.     

Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy: A New Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), for which locoregional treatment is not an option, is a candidate for palliative systemic therapy, but an accepted chemotherapy regimen does not exist. We have conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analyses to quantify the benefits of oxaliplatin (OXA)-based chemotherapy in advanced HCC in patients not exposed to sorafenib. Studies that enrolled advanced HCC patients treated with first-line OXA-based chemotherapy were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE. A systematic review was conducted to calculate the pooled response rate and 95% confidence interval. The pooled median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, weighted on the number of patients of each selected trials, were also calculated. We tested for significant heterogeneity by Cochran's chi-squared test and I-square index. Thirteen studies were included in this review, with a total of 800 patients analysed. The pooled response rate was 16.8%. The median PFS and overall survival were 4.2 and 9.3 months, respectively, with a 1 year overall survival of 37%. The weighted median PFS/overall survival and response rate were 4.5/11 months and 20% in Western patients. Conversely, in Asiatic studies, the median PFS/overall survival and response rate were 2.43/6.47 months and 13.2%, respectively. OXA-based chemotherapy is effective in advanced HCC and represents a viable option in these patients. A head to head comparison with sorafenib or a second-line agent should be verified in prospective trials.     

Successful palliation of stenosing anorectal melanoma by intratumoral injections with natural interferon-beta

Anorectal malignant melanoma is an uncommon tumour. Unlike for cutaneous melanoma, there are few guidelines for its optimal management. In particular, very few palliative treatment strategies have been described for patients with advanced disease. We report on an 80 year old patient with locally advanced anorectal melanoma nearly completely blocking the anal orifice and disseminated metastases. Complete regression of the primary tumour and partial remission of the metastases was achieved with intratumoral injections of natural interferon-beta and systemic administration of dacarbazine. The quality of life in this patient was improved markedly by providing relief from severe rectal pain and bleeding. We propose that conservative treatment strategies such as intratumoral injections with interferon-beta should be considered as a palliative treatment option for stenosing anorectal melanoma before an abdominoperineal resection is recommended.     

Immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical trials to real-world data and future advances

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. HCC is an inflammation-associated immunogenic cancer that frequently arises in chronically inflamed livers. Advanced HCC is managed with systemic therapies; the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib has been used in 1^st-line setting since 2007. Immunotherapies have emerged as promising treatments across solid tumors including HCC for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are licensed in 1^st- and 2^nd-line treatment setting. The treatment field of advanced HCC is continuously evolving. Several clinical trials are investigating novel ICI candidates as well as new ICI regimens in combination with other therapeutic modalities including systemic agents, such as other ICIs, TKIs, and anti-angiogenics. Novel immunotherapies including adoptive cell transfer, vaccine-based approaches, and virotherapy are also being brought to the fore. Yet, despite advances, several challenges persist. Lack of real-world data on the use of immunotherapy for advanced HCC in patients outside of clinical trials constitutes a main limitation hindering the breadth of application and generalizability of data to this larger and more diverse patient cohort. Consequently, issues encountered in real-world practice include patient ineligibly for immunotherapy because of contraindications, comorbidities, or poor performance status; lack of response, efficacy, and safety data; and cost-effectiveness. Further real-world data from high-quality large prospective cohort studies of immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC is mandated to aid evidence-based clinical decision-making. This review provides a critical and comprehensive overview of clinical trials and real-world data of immunotherapy for HCC, with a focus on ICIs, as well as novel immunotherapy strategies underway.     

Treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Aim: Liver transplantation (LT) is a curative treatment for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the recurrence rate after LT is about 10–20%, with a dismal prognosis. Little data exist as to the natural history, treatment outcome and optimal treatment of recurrent HCC after LT. We reviewed various treatment modalities given to patients with recurrent HCC after LT. Methods: Among 132 patients who underwent LT for localized HCC, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of 39 of the 132 patients who developed recurrent HCC after LT. We analyzed the clinical outcome of various treatment modalities and treatment‐related adverse events. Results: A total of 39 (29%) of the original 132 patients had recurrent HCC, most recurrences (82%) having occurred within 1 year after LT and involved extrahepatic lesions. Only seven patients had recurrent disease limited to the liver. The median overall survival from the initial treatment of all relapsed patients was 6.9 months. There were various initial treatment modalities, namely palliative systemic chemotherapy, trans‐catheter arterial chemo‐embolization/infusion (TACE/I), radiation therapy (RT), surgical resection and no treatment. The median overall survival was 9.5 months for first‐line chemotherapy, including those who had prior local therapy, 6.3 months TACE/I and 6.9 months for RT. Conclusion: Various clinical approaches have been used to treat patients with recurrent HCC after LT in a clinical setting. More effective strategies and clinical guidelines for recurrent HCC following LT must be established.     

Immunonkologie von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren

Treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is nowadays multidisciplinary. Therapeutic concepts include modern surgical and radiation techniques as well as systemic therapies. However, the prognosis of these patients is still poor for all stages. In the recurrent or metastatic situation after definitive therapy, there is an indication for palliative systemic treatment, whereby classical platinum-based chemotherapy and the monoclonal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab are established, and immunotherapy (IO) has recently been proven a potent treatment option. In this review, the results of trials relevant for approval of checkpoint inhibitors in the palliative setting after platinum failure, as well as ongoing trials evaluating their impact as first-line treatment, in combination with definitive or adjuvant radiation, preoperatively in resectable head and neck cancers, or in combination with other IO therapeutics shall be discussed.     

Molecularly targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in 2012: current status and future perspectives

Improving the overall survival for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires development of effective systemic therapy. Despite the successful approval and extensive application of sorafenib, the prognosis for patients with advanced HCC remains poor and the benefits with sorafenib are modest. In the past few years, there have been renewed and continued interests and active research in developing other molecularly targeted agents in HCC. While the initial efforts are focusing on anti-angiogenic therapy, other agents targeting the epidermal growth factor-receptor, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met among others have entered HCC clinical trials. Combining different molecularly targeted agents or combining targeted agents with chemotherapy represent other strategies under investigation. This review will attempt to summarize the current status of other molecularly targeted agents or regimens beyond sorafenib under development in advanced HCC and the future perspectives.     

肝细胞癌切除术标准及其临床意义*

目的:阐述肝细胞癌（肝癌）切除术标准,为把握手术指征、指导治疗、提高疗效提供依据。方法:使用CNKI、NCBI生物信息学数据库,以“肝切除/liver resection 、肝癌/hepatocellular carcinoma（HCC ）”为关键词,检索已发表的文章,排除重复研究和与本研究无关文献后精选纳入分析。总结肝切除标准分类,陈述其关键因素和争议焦点,比较不同标准肝切除患者预后,讨论预后差异的可能原因。结果:HCC 切除术标准的主流分法为二分法,即根治性和姑息性切除,其关键因素包括外科、肿瘤及随访因素,肝切缘大小是否影响根治效果曾是外科因素中争论热点。近年,随着肿瘤分子生物学技术的进步,学者们对HCC 切除术标准的分法有所改变,在三分法（病理根治、临床根治和姑息切除）基础上提出HCC 切除术五分法,将病理根治划分为绝对根治（无潜在转移）和相对根治（有潜在转移）,临床根治划分为有反应切除（短期内相关指标下降,如甲胎蛋白）、无反应切除（指标持续异常）和姑息性切除。根治性切除患者预后好于姑息性切除。研究显示,肝切除促进肿瘤侵袭转移潜能可能与HCC 早期播散有关,也可能与术后残余HCC 生物学特性改变相关,目前缺乏有效的干预措施。结论:根治性肝切除是目前公认的治疗HCC 患者最有效的方法之一;确定HCC 切除术标准有利于总结、分析临床资料,也有利于评估患者预后,对选择有效的治疗策略具有重要的临床意义。      

Management of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

Sorafenib (Nexavar?, Bayer), a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was the first systemic agent that demonstrated a significant improvement in the overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and well-preserved liver function. This drug is now recommended in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma as first-line therapy and for patients not suitable for locoregional treatment. This brief article, produced by a multidisciplinary panel including specialists in gastroenterology and oncology, provides an overview of the major issues related to systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib, including staging and prognostic strategies, assessment of liver disease and its complications, and efficacy and safety of this molecule. Particular emphasis is given on how to improve tolerability of sorafenib in difficult-to-treat patients.     

Management of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer

The locoregional recurrence of breast cancer is not a sign of distant metastases, and a substantial proportion of cases are cured by salvage therapy. Patients with locoregional recurrence should not be treated with palliative intent as if they have visceral metastases. The recommended treatment for ipsilateral breast recurrence after breast conservative therapy is a mastectomy. For patients who suffer from isolated chest wall recurrence after mastectomy, a surgical approach is recommended. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered for patients with unresectable disease in order to render the disease resectable. For patients with isolated chest wall recurrence who have received no prior radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy involving the chest wall and regional lymph nodes is recommended. Patients with isolated axillary lymph node recurrence should be treated with axillary dissection or resection. Although the effectiveness of systemic therapy for patients with locoregional recurrence is unclear, there is a trend toward treating patients with supraclavicular lymph node recurrence with radiotherapy plus systemic therapy. Pain relief and the eradication of other distressing symptoms resulting from inoperable disease are achieved in two-thirds to three-quarters of patients by radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. New anti-cancer agents and molecular target therapies should be evaluated with the objective of improving the treatment outcome of patients with locoregional recurrence. A combination of approaches is required for treatment of patients with locoregional recurrence, and a multidisciplinary tumor board should be organized at each institute.