辛伐他汀联合依折麦布治疗急性冠脉综合征的疗效

目的:探讨在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中使用辛伐他汀联合依折麦布的有效性及安全性。方法:从我院2012年5月到2013年5月选择ACS合并低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)100mg/dl患者共124例,随机均分为瑞舒伐他汀组(瑞舒伐他汀20mg/d)和联合治疗组(40mg/d辛伐他汀加10mg/d依折麦布),治疗1个月,主要观察两组血脂水平及不良反应的发生率。结果:治疗1个月后,两组LDL-C、总胆固醇(TC)以及甘油三酯(TG)水平均较治疗前显著降低,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平显著升高(P均0.01),联合治疗组的上述血脂水平均与瑞舒伐他汀组无显著差异(P0.05),但是联合治疗组肌痛发生率要显著低于瑞舒伐他汀组(4.8%比17.7%,P=0.023),其他不良反应事件无显著差异(P均0.05)。结论:在急性冠脉综合征患者中使用辛伐他汀加依折麦布是有效的及安全的,值得推广。     

依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀在急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后的应用效果

目的 探讨依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)术后的应用效果。方法 选择2018年9月至2019年4月收治的ACS患者70例为研究对象,均于急诊行PCI术治疗。将纳入的研究对象随机分为对照组和观察组,每组35例。对照组患者PCI术后行瑞舒伐他汀治疗,观察组患者给予依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀治疗,两组均治疗12个月。比较两组患者治疗前后的血清总胆固醇、三酰甘油、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、内皮素-1、脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A₂(Lp-PLA₂)水平;比较两组患者治疗12个月后的冠脉支架内再狭窄率、治疗期间不良反应发生情况,以及随访1年期间心血管不良事件的发生情况。结果 治疗12个月后,观察组患者的血清总胆固醇、三酰甘油、LDL-C、内皮素-1、Lp-PLA₂水平均低于对照组(均P<0.05);两组患者的血清HDL-C水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者治疗12个月后的冠脉支架内再狭窄率(5.71%)低于对照组(22.86%)(P...     

急性冠状动脉综合征患者应用依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀治疗的临床研究

目的:观察依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者血脂及心脏事件的影响,并对其安全性评价。方法:回顾性分析北京安贞医院2010年1月至2010年12月间,住院的ACS患者236例,其中应用依折麦布(10 mg/d)联合阿托伐他汀(10 mg/d)治疗的患者81例(A组),应用阿托伐他汀(20 mg/d)治疗的患者155例(B组),治疗8 w后,比较两组患者治疗前后hs-CRP、LDL-C、TC、TG及HDL-C的变化,心脏事件以及不良反应发生率。结果:两组患者基线资料、治疗期间腹胀等不良反应及病死率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗8w后,A组hs-CRP、LDL-C、TC值、再发心绞痛及再发心肌梗死比例显著低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对ACS患者联合应用阿托伐他汀与依折麦布显著降低hs-CRP、LDL-C、TC水平及心脏事件发生率,且不增加不良反应,安全有效。     

阿托伐他汀联合依折麦布治疗急性冠状动脉综合征临床观察

目的观察联合应用阿托伐他汀和依折麦布治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效。方法 306例急性冠状动脉综合征患者随机分为他汀常规剂量组(n=98,阿托伐他汀20 mg/d),他汀加倍剂量组(n=103,阿托伐他汀40 mg/d),联合治疗组(n=105,阿托伐他汀20 mg/d+依折麦布组10 mg/d)。治疗前和治疗24周后检测患者血清总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLC)、甘油三酯(TG)水平,并观察各治疗组不良反应和心血管事件的发生情况。结果经24周治疗后,各组TC、TG、LDLC低于治疗前,联合治疗组治疗后TC(2.51±0.51 mmol/L比3.22±0.53 mmol/L和3.10±0.63 mmol/L,P0.05)、LDLC(1.58±0.27 mmol/L比2.11±0.33 mmol/L和2.01±0.31mmol/L,P0.05)、TG(1.12±0.30 mmol/L比1.67±0.39 mmol/L和1.53±0.27 mmol/L,P0.05)下降较他汀常规剂量组、他汀加倍剂量组更明显。联合治疗组LDLC降低达标率(69.5%)明显优于他汀常规剂量组(43.9%)和他汀加倍剂量组(48.5%,P0.05)。联合治疗组不良反应发生率较他汀加倍剂量组低(P0.05),心血管事件(再发心绞痛、急性心肌梗死)发生率也低于其他两组(P0.05)。结论应用阿托伐他汀联合依折麦布治疗急性冠状动脉综合征较单用阿托伐他汀能更显著改善血脂水平,减少心血管事件,并具有良好的安全性。     

糖尿病高脂血症行依折麦布与瑞舒伐他汀联合治疗的疗效评价

选取54例血糖控制良好的糖尿病合并高脂血症患者,随机分为两组。对照组26例,给予瑞舒伐他10mg,每日1次;治疗组28例,给依折麦布与瑞舒伐他汀各10mg,每日1次。以总胆固醇（TC）、三酰甘油（TG）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL—C）和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL—C）为参数,3个月后比较两组治疗前后血脂谱水平。结果：两组的总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇均较治疗前有显著下降（P〈0．05）,且治疗组较对照组明显（P〈0．01）,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇较治疗前显著升高（P〈0．05）。治疗组各项指标变化与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀较单用瑞舒伐他汀能更有效地改善糖尿病患者的血脂谱,是一种理想的降脂方案。     

瑞舒伐他汀联合依折麦布治疗老年糖尿病并发高脂血症的临床疗效

目的探讨瑞舒伐他汀与依折麦布联合治疗在老年糖尿病(DM)并发高脂血症中的临床疗效。方法选取该院2013年7月至2015年2月收治的老年DM并发高脂血症患者76例,按随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组。对照组采用瑞舒伐他汀治疗,观察患者采用瑞舒伐他汀与依折麦布联合治疗,对比两组患者临床治疗效果。结果观察组患者临床治疗有效率高于对照组;观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);且观察组患者治疗后血清总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白(LGL-C)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)等血脂指标改善情况明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论瑞舒伐他汀与依折麦布联合治疗在老年DM并发高脂血症患者中的应用效果显著,可进行临床推广。     

依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀对急性冠状动脉综合征患者血脂及血管内皮功能的影响

目的　对比观察急性冠状动脉综合征患者单用阿托伐他汀、合用依折麦布加阿托伐他汀时血清总胆固醇（TC）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDLC）、内皮素1（ET-1）、一氧化氮（NO）水平的变化,探讨依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀调脂及血管内皮保护功能的疗效及安全性。方法　2011年6月至2011年12月连续入选125例急性冠状动脉综合征患者,随机分为阿托伐他汀组（每晚口服阿托伐他汀20　mg）和联合组（每晚口服阿托伐他汀20　mg和依折麦布10　mg）,服药12周后比较治疗前及治疗12周时TC、LDLC、ET-1、NO的变化。结果　（1）两组治疗12周后与治疗前比较,TC、LDLC、ET-1明显降低,NO明显升高;联合组较阿托伐他汀组TC、LDLC、ET-1降低更明显,NO升高更明显（TC：3.20±0.55　mmol/L比4.28±0.59　mmol/L,P<0.01;LDLC：1.92±0.33　mmol/L比2.63±0.53　mmol/L,P<0.01;ET-1：3.88±1.15　ng/L比4.49±0.85　ng/L,P<0.05;NO：80.39±7.87　μmol/L比72.18±12.16　μmol/L,P<0.05）,联合组比阿托伐他汀组进一步降低TC　17.5%、LDLC　17.4%、ET-1　10.4%,进一步升高NO　14.2%;（2）以LDLC＜2.60　mmol/L为达标标准,阿托伐他汀组达标率为47.6%,联合组达标率为81.8%;（3）治疗期间两组均有2例服药2周左右出现肝酶升高超过3倍,因此退出试验。结论　急性冠状动脉综合征患者阿托伐他汀联用依折麦布有更好的调脂及血管内皮保护作用,且毒副反应少,安全性好。     

依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀钙治疗老年冠心病合并高脂血症的疗效观察

目的探讨依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀钙治疗老年冠心病合并高脂血症的临床疗效。方法选取64例老年冠心病合并高脂血症患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组。对照组仅给予瑞舒伐他汀钙,治疗组采用依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀钙治疗,比较两组的临床疗效、血脂水平及主要心脏不良事件。结果对照组总有效率为75.0%,治疗组总有效率为87.5%,治疗组疗效明显优于对照组（P〈0.05）。治疗组在胆固醇（TC）、三酰甘油（TG）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）及主要心脏不良事件发生率明显下降,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）明显升高,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论采用依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀钙治疗老年冠心病合并高脂血症可降低主要心脏不良事件发生率,提高疗效。     

依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀在2型糖尿病合并高脂血症患者中的疗效

目的比较使用瑞舒伐他汀联合依折麦布和加大他汀剂量治疗他汀降脂治疗不能达标的2型糖尿病患者的疗效。方法入选2012年9月至2013年9月于辽宁省朝阳市第二医院心内科就诊的2型糖尿病患者同时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)100 mg/d L,服用瑞舒伐他汀(2.5 mg/d)12周后仍LDL-C80 mg/d L86例,其中男性58例,女性28例,平均年龄为(64.76±11.3)岁。随机分为瑞舒伐他汀+依折麦布组(43例)和瑞舒伐他汀组(43例)。瑞舒伐他汀+依折麦布组在常规治疗基础上每天服用2.5 mg瑞舒伐他汀加10mg依折麦布;瑞舒伐他汀组在常规治疗基础上每天服用10 mg瑞舒伐他汀,均连续治疗12周。主要观察治疗前后血脂水平、肌酸激酶、肝功能、血糖及胰岛素等的变化。结果与本组基线水平比较,两组治疗后LDL-C、三酰甘油(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)下降,LDL-C80 mg/d L、LDL-C100 mg/d L比例增加,差异具有统计学意义(P均0.05)。与瑞舒伐他汀组治疗后比较,瑞舒伐他汀+依折麦布组治疗后LDL-C[(90±18)mg/d L vs.(72±15)mg/d L]、TG[(122±12)mg/d L vs.(103±13)mg/d L]、TC[(146±13)mg/d L vs.(138±16)mg/d L]下降,差异具有统计学意义(P均0.05)。瑞舒伐他汀+依折麦布组较瑞舒伐他汀组LDL-C80 mg/d L、LDL-C100 mg/d L比例增加,差异具有统计学意义(P均0.05)。两组治疗前、治疗后谷草转氨酶、谷丙转氨酶、胃肠道不良反应比较,差异无统计学意义(P均0.05)。结论他汀治疗后血脂不达标的2型糖尿病患者,使用瑞舒伐他汀联用依折麦布效果优于单用瑞舒伐他汀加强治疗。     

阿托伐他汀联合应用依折麦布的临床观察

目的探讨阿托伐他汀联合应用依折麦布治疗严重高胆固醇血症患者的降脂疗效。方法42例严重高胆固醇血症患者用阿托伐他汀（20mg／d）治疗后,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL—C）未达标的患者联合应用依折麦布（10mg／d）,观察治疗12周后的血脂水平,并观察对天冬氨酸转氨酶（AST）、丙氨酸转氨酶（ALT）和肌酸激酶（cK）的影响。结果服用阿托伐他汀后,全部患者的总胆固醇（TC）、LDL—C和甘油三酯（TG）均明显降低,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL—C）明显上升,与用药前比较P〈0．01。联用依折麦布后,TC、LDL—C、TG进一步下降,与用药前比较P〈0．01,HDL—C虽有变化,但差异无统计学意义。治疗前后AST、ALT和CK均无明显变化。结论阿托伐他汀联合应用依折麦布对高胆固醇血症患者有更好的降脂效果,并提高降脂达标率。     

Effect of rosuvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia

Rosuvastatin is a new, synthetic, orally active statin, with marked low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering activity. We conducted 2 dose-ranging studies. In the first study, after a 6-week dietary run-in, 142 moderately hypercholesterolemic patients were randomized equally to receive double-blind placebo or rosuvastatin 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg or open-label atorvastatin 10 or 80 mg once daily for 6 weeks; in the second study, conducted to extend the rosuvastatin dose range, 64 patients were randomized to double-blind, once-daily placebo or rosuvastatin 40 or 80 mg (1:1:2 ratio) for 6 weeks. Data from both studies were combined for analysis of lipid effects. No statistical comparison of atorvastatin arms with placebo or rosuvastatin was performed. Rosuvastatin was associated with highly significant dose-dependent reductions in LDL cholesterol compared with placebo (p <0.001); decreases ranged from 34% (1 mg) to 65% (80 mg). Linear regression analysis indicated an additional 4.5% LDL cholesterol reduction for each doubling of the rosuvastatin dose. Across the dose range, approximately 90% of LDL cholesterol reduction occurred within the first 2 weeks of treatment. Significant, dose-dependent reductions in total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B with rosuvastatin were also observed (p <0.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increases and triglyceride reductions were consistently observed and statistically significant at some dose levels. All lipid ratios were significantly reduced at all rosuvastatin dose levels (p <0.001). Adverse events were similar across placebo and active treatments. No significant increases in alanine aminotransferase or creatine kinase were seen in any patient. Over 6 weeks, rosuvastatin produced large, rapid, dose-dependent LDL cholesterol reductions and was well tolerated in hypercholesterolemic patients.     

Comparison of effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with type IIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 52 centers in North America to compare the effects of the new, highly effective statin, rosuvastatin, with atorvastatin and placebo in hypercholesterolemic patients. After a 6-week dietary run-in, 516 patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or =4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dl) and < 6.47 mmol/L (250 mg/dl) and triglycerides < or =4.52 mmol/L (400 mg/dl) were randomized to 12 weeks of once-daily placebo (n = 132), rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 128), rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 129), or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 127). The primary efficacy end point was percent change in LDL cholesterol. Secondary efficacy variables were achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II), ATP III, and European Atherosclerosis Society LDL cholesterol goals and percent change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein A-I. Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg compared with atorvastatin 10 mg were associated with greater LDL cholesterol reductions (-40% and -43% vs 35%; p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively) and HDL cholesterol increases (13% and 12% vs 8%, p <0.01 and p <0.05, respectively). Total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B reductions and apolipoprotein A-I increases were also greater with rosuvastatin; triglyceride reductions were similar. Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg were associated with improved achievement in ATP II (84% in both rosuvastatin groups vs 73%) and ATP III (84% and 82% vs 72%) LDL cholesterol goals, and rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin in achieving European Atherosclerosis Society LDL cholesterol goals. Both treatments were well tolerated.     

Effects of maximal doses of atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin on small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

Maximal doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are highly effective in lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels; however, rosuvastatin has been shown to be significantly more effective than atorvastatin in lowering LDL cholesterol and in increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and its subclasses. Our purpose in this post hoc subanalysis of an open-label study was to compare the effects of daily oral doses of rosuvastatin 40 mg with atorvastatin 80 mg over a 6-week period on direct LDL cholesterol and small dense LDL (sdLDL) cholesterol in 271 hyperlipidemic men and women versus baseline values. Rosuvastatin was significantly (p<0.01) more effective than atorvastatin in decreasing sdLDL cholesterol (-53% vs -46%), direct LDL cholesterol (-52% vs -50%), total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio (-46% vs -39%), and non-HDL cholesterol (-51% vs -48%), The magnitude of these differences was modest, and the 2 statins caused similar decreases in triglyceride levels (-24% and -26%). In conclusion, our data indicate that the 2 statins, given at their maximal doses, significantly and beneficially alter the entire spectrum of lipoprotein particles, but that rosuvastatin is significantly more effective than atorvastatin in lowering direct LDL cholesterol and sdLDL cholesterol.     

The effect of early statin treatment on inflammation and cardiac events in acute coronary syndrome patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

We investigated the effects of atorvastatin on inflammation and cardiac events during the inpatient period and initial 6-month follow-up in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with low low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level. One hundred and twelve consecutive ACS patients with LDL cholesterol less than 100 mg/dl were included in the study (mean 78.2 ± 12.3 mg/dl). While 70 randomly selected patients received a dose of 40 mg atorvastatin within the first 24 h on top of their standard treatment as the atorvastatin group, the remaining 42 patients considered as the control group were given the standard treatment only, i.e., without any lipid-lowering drug therapy. Lipid profile, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and plasma amyloid A (SAA) levels were measured in all patients within the first 24 h of chest pain, on the 5th day, and in the 6th month. During the inpatient period and subsequent 6-month follow-up, all episodes of angina, reinfarction, revascularization, heart failure, rehospitalization, cardiac mortality, and total number of cardiac events were recorded. In the atorvastatin group, hsCRP and SAA values on the 5th day and in the 6th month compared to the first 24 h were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.0001). Mean LDL cholesterol level was significantly decreased in the atorvastatin group (55.7 ± 17.7 mg/dl), but there was no significant change in the control group at the 6th month. The frequency of heart failure during the inpatient period and angina, unstable angina pectoris, heart failure, and revascularization in the first 6 months were also significantly reduced in the atorvastatin group. Atorvastatin started in the first 24 h reduces inflammation and improves the prognosis during both the inpatient period and the first 6 months of clinical follow-up in ACS patients with low LDL cholesterol levels.     

Prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with documented coronary heart disease or risk equivalent and controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Current guidelines identify low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as the primary target for cardiovascular prevention but also recognize low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol as an important secondary target. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of low HDL cholesterol in a contemporary ambulatory high-risk population across various LDL cholesterol levels, including patients taking statins. Screening of 44,052 electronic medical records from a primary care practice identified 1,512 high-risk patients with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents. Low HDL cholesterol (< or =40 mg/dl in men, < or =50 mg/dl in women) was present in 66% of the 1,512 patients. Low HDL cholesterol was prevalent across all LDL cholesterol levels but most prevalent in patients with LDL cholesterol < or =70 mg/dl (79% vs 66% in those with LDL cholesterol 71 to 100 mg/dl and 64% in patients with LDL cholesterol >100 mg/dl, p <0.01). Low HDL cholesterol was equally and highly prevalent in patients taking statins (67%) and those not taking statins (64%) (p = NS). HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels correlated poorly (R(2) = 0.01), and this was unaffected by gender or statin treatment. In conclusion, in high-risk patients with CHD or CHD risk equivalents, low HDL cholesterol levels remain prevalent despite statin treatment and the achievement of aggressive LDL cholesterol goals.     

Impact of statin therapy on coronary intervention for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome with decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with statins are well established. This study investigated the effects of statins on patients who presented with low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, were diagnosed with non-ST elevation ACS, and subsequently underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). METHODS: From 2000 to 2003, 87 patients(mean age 68 +/- 10 years, 69 males, 18 females) underwent PCI because of non-ST elevation ACS, and had low LDL cholesterol on presentation. These patients were divided into two groups: those who had been taking statins (S-group, n = 46), and those not taking statins, or controls (C-group, n = 41). Only patients whose LDL cholesterol was < 100 mg/dl at admission (average: 82 +/- 12 mg/dl) were included in the study. Troponin-T (TnT), creatine kinase (CK), CK-MB, and high-sense C reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured before and 6 hr after PCI. The two groups were evaluated at 6 months clinical follow-up. RESULTS: There was no difference in these markers before PCI in both groups. TnT and CK-MB in the S-group at 6 hr post-PCI were significantly decreased compared to those of the C-group (0.45 +/- 1.34 vs 1.40 +/- 2.37 ng/ml, respectively, for TnT, p = 0.04; 17.2 +/- 45.5 vs 81.3 +/- 157.2 IU/l, respectively, for CK-MB, p = 0.02). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and target lesion revascularization were evaluated after 6 months. There was no difference in MACE between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Statin treatment before PCI in patients with non-ST elevation ACS demonstrated beneficial effects such as less myocardial damage, even though both groups presented with low LDL cholesterol levels. However, no significant effect on MACE was seen at 6 months after PCI.